BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

17 Amendments of Edward CZESAK related to 2016/0014(COD)

Amendment 468 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
[...]deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 729 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall establish a national fee structure to cover the costs for theirissuing type-approval certificates and market surveillance activities as well as for the type-approval testing and conformity of production testing and inspections carried out by the technical services they have designated.
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 737 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Those national fees shall be levied on the manufacturers who have applied for type-approval in the Member State concerned. Fees shall not be levied directly by technical services.
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 748 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
3. The national fee structure shall also cover the costs for the compliance verification inspections and tests carried out by the Commission in accordance with Article 9. These contributions shall constitute external assigned revenues for the general budget of the European Union, according to Art. 21(4) of the Financial Regulation26 . __________________ 26 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2015 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1–96).deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 773 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. TNational type-approvals for vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units shall be issued for a limited period of 5 years without the possibility of prolongation. The expiry date shall be indicated in the type-approval certificate. After the expiry of the type- approval certificate, it may be renewed upon application by the manufacturer and only where the approval authority has verified that the type of vehicle, system, component and separate technical unit complies with all the requirements of the relevant regulatory acts for new vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units of that type.
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 782 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Upon reception of the notification made by the manufacturer, the approval authority that granted the EU type- approval shall communicate without delay to the approval authorities of the other Member States and the Commission all relevant information for the making available on the market, registering or entering into service of vehicles, where appropriate.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 785 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
That communication shall specify the date of production and the vehicle identification number ('VIN'), as defined in Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EU) 19/201127, of the last vehicle produced. __________________ 27 concerning type-approval requirements for the manufacturer’s statutory plate and for the vehicle identification number of motor vehicles and their trailers and implementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor (OJ L 8, 12.1.2011, p. 1).deleted Commission Regulation (EU) 19/2011
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 805 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 4
4. OnlyThe number of end-of-series vehicles with a valid certifimay not exceed 10%, in the catse of conformity that has remained valid for at least three months after its date of issue, but for which the type-approval has become invalid pursuantM1 category vehicles, or 30%, in the case of vehicles belonging to other categories, of the number of vehicles registered in the two point (a) of Article 33(2), may be made available on the market, registered or entered into service in the Unionreceding years or 100 vehicles of each type per Member State, whichever is greater.
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 936 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 8
8. The type-approval authority shall be peer-reviewed by two type-approval authorities of other Member States every two years. The Member States shall draw up the annual plan for the peer-review, ensuring an appropriate rotation in respect of reviewing and reviewed type-approval authorities, and submit it to the Commission. The peer-review shall include an on-site visit to a technical service under the responsibility of the reviewed authority. The Commission may participate in the review and decide on its participation on the basis of a risk assessment analysis.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 954 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 9
9. The outcome of the peer-review shall be communicated to all Member States and to the Commission and a summary of the outcome shall be made publicly available. It shall be discussed by the Forum established in Article 10 on the basis of an assessment of this outcome carried out by the Commission and issue recommendations.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 961 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 10
10. The Member States shall provide information to the Commission and the other Member States on how it has addressed the recommendations in the peer-review report.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 997 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Representatives of the type-approval authorities of at least two other Member States shall, in coordination with the type- approval authority of the Member State in which the applicant technical service is established, and together with a representative of the Commission, form a joint assessment team and participate in the assessment of the applicant technical service, including the on-site assessment. The designating type-approval authority of the Member State where the applicant technical service is established shall give those representatives timely access to the documents necessary to assess the applicant technical service.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1004 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2
2. The joint assessment team shall raise findings regarding non-compliance of the applicant technical service with the requirements set out in Articles 72 to 76, in Articles 84 and 85 and in Appendix 2 to Annex V during the assessment process. These findings shall be discussed between the designating approval authority and the joint assessment team with a view to finding common agreement with respect to the assessment of the application.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1006 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 3
3. The joint assessment team shall produce within 45 days after the on-site assessment a report setting out the extent to which the applicant complies with the requirements set out in in Articles 72 to 76, in Articles 84 and 85 and in Appendix 2 to Annex V of this Regulation.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1008 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 4
4. This report shall contain a summary of identified non-compliances. Divergent opinions between members of the joint assessment team shall be reflected in the report, together with a recommendation whether the applicant could be designated as technical service.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1009 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 5
5. The Member States shall notify to the Commission the names of the representatives of the type-approval authority to call upon for each joint assessment.deleted
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 1104 #
Edward CZESAK
Proposal for a regulation
Article 90
1. by the Commission referred to in Article 9(1) and (4), or Article 54(1) reveals non- compliance of the vehicle, system, component, separate technical unit with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, the Commission may impose administrative fines upon the concerned economic operator for the infringement of this Regulation. The administrative fines provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In particular the fines shall be proportionate to the number of non-compliant vehicles registered in the Union market, or the number of non-compliant systems, components or separate technical unit made available on the Union market. The administrative fines imposed by the Commission shall not be in addition to the penalties imposed by the Member States in accordance with Article 89 for the same infringement and shall not exceed EUR 30 000 per non-compliant vehicle, system, component or separate technical unit. 2. delegated acts in accordance with Article 88 to lay down the methods for the calculation and collection of the administrative fines referred to in paragraph 1. 3. fines shall be considered as revenue for the general budget of the European Union.Article 90 deleted Administrative fines Where the compliance verification The Commission may adopt The amounts of administrative
2016/10/18
Committee: IMCO
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation