3 Amendments of Gérard DEPREZ related to 2015/2121(BUD)
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Asks the Commission to carry out, in the context of the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework, an evaluation, as precisely as possible, of the needs of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund until 2020; asks the Commission to make a proposal for an adequate increase and, as it occurs, an adjusted distribution of funding between the different programs and methods of implementation of the Fund, following the revision of the financial perspectives;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Expresses its intention to modify the budget nomenclature of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund in the interests of transparency and better control of the allocation of the annual appropriations between programs and means of implementation of the fund, as specified in Regulation (EU) No 516/20141 ; ____________ 1In accordance with Regulation No (EU) No 516/2014, the amount of global resources allocated to the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund for 2014- 2020 is EUR 3 137 million. This amount is allocated as follows: a.EUR 2 392 million for national programs (Article 19); b.EUR 360 million for specific actions listed in Annex II (Article 16), the resettlement programs (Article 17), the transfers (Article 18); c.EUR 385 million for the action of the Union (Article 20), emergency aid (Article 21), the European Migration Network (Article 22), technical assistance (Article 23). The current budget nomenclature doesn't correspond in any way to this allocation.)
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the relevant agencies should not be subject to reduction or redeployment of staff; stresses that, given the large number of arrivals on the Union’s southern shores and the increasing role EASO has to play in the management of the asylum, in particular its support for Members States in the programme of resettlement and relocation, the proposal to increase EASO staff by only 4 is clearly insufficient;