BETA

Activities of Lieve WIERINCK related to 2018/0172(COD)

Plenary speeches (1)

Reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (debate) NL
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0172(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment
2016/11/22
Committee: ECON
Dossiers: 2018/0172(COD)
Documents: PDF(521 KB) DOC(163 KB)

Amendments (17)

Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Marine litter is of a transboundary nature and is recognized as a global problem. Successful prevention and management of plastic waste is most effective through international cooperation and when using a scientific, evidence-based approach. Reducing marine litter is a key action for the achievement of United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14 which calls to conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development.36 The Union must play its part in tackling marine litter and aim to be a standard setter for the world. In this context, the Union is working with partners in many international fora such as G20, G7 and United Nations to promote concerted action. This initiative is part of the Union efforts in this regard. _________________ 36 The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 25 September 2015.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
(3) Marine litter is of a transboundary nature and is recognized as a global problem. Reducing marine litter is a key action for the achievement of United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14 which calls to conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development.36 The Union must play its part in tackling marine litter and aim to be a standard setter for the world. In this context, the Union is workingshould enforce its collaboration with partners in many international fora such as G20, G7 and United Nations to promote concerted action. This initiative is part of the Union efforts in this regardto reduce waste for a sustainable and circular economy. _________________ 36 The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 25 September 2015.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Certain single-use plastic products end up in the environment as a result of inappropriate disposal through sewers or other inappropriate release into the environment. Therefore, single-use plastic products that are frequently disposed of through sewers otherwise inappropriately disposed of should be subject to marking requirements. The marking should inform consumers about appropriate waste disposal options and/or waste disposal options to be avoided and/or about the negative environmental impacts of litter as a result of inappropriate disposal. The Commission should be empowered to establish a harmonised format for the marking and when doing so should, where appropriate, test the perception of the proposed marking with representative groups of consumers to ensure that it is effective and clearly understandable, while taking into account existing sectorial voluntary agreements that were adopted for this purpose.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15 a (new)
(15 a) A uniform implementation of extended producer responsibility measures shall be ensured, in order to avoid distortions of competition in the internal market.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15 b (new)
(15 b) Economic incentives can influence consumer choice, encourage or discourage specific consumer habits and can thus be used as an effective upstream tool for reducing the impact of certain plastics on the environment.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) Pursuant to paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201648 , the Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Directive. That evaluation should be based on experience gathered and data collected during the implementation of this Directive and data collected under Directive 2008/56/EC or Directive 2008/98/EC. The evaluation should provide the basis for an assessment of possible further measures and an assessment whether, in view of monitoring of marine litter in the Union, the Annex listing single-use plastic products needs to be reviewed. The evaluation should also consider whether scientific and technical progress that has taken place in the meantime, including the development of biodegradable materials and the development of criteria or a standard for biodegradability of plastics in the marine environment, as foreseen in the European Plastics Strategy, allows the setting of a standard for biodegradation of certain single-use plastic products in the marine environment. That standard would include a standard to test if, as a result of physical and biological decomposition in the marine environment, plastics would fully decompose into carbon dioxide (CO2), biomass and water within a timescale short enough for the plastics not to be harmful for marine life and not lead to an accumulation of plastics in the environment. If that is the case, single-use plastic products that meet such a standard could be exempted from the prohibition on placing on the market. While the European Strategy for Plastics already envisages action in this area, it also recognises the challenges in relation to determining a regulatory framework for plastics with biodegradable properties due to different marine conditions across seas. Furthermore, the assessment shall evaluate the impact of the additional administrative burden and compliance costs, on sectors most affected by this Directive, with a specific focus on SME's. _________________ 48 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
The objective of this Directive is to strengthen the Union's leading role in preventing and reduceing the impact of certain plastic products on the environment, in particular the aquatic environment, and on human health as well as to promote the transition to a circular economy with innovative business models, products and materials, thus also contributing to the efficient functioning of the internal market.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to achieve a significant reduction in the consumption of the single-use plastic products listed in Part A of the Annex on their territory by … [sixfour years after the end-date for transposition of this Directive].
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Those measures may include national consumption reduction targets, measures ensuring that reusable and recyclable alternatives to those products are made available at the point of sale to the final consumer, economic instruments, providing for economic incentives or disincentives, such as ensuring that single- use plastic products are not provided free of charge at the point of sale to the final consumer. Those measures may vary depending on the environmental impact of the products referred to in the first subparagraph.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission mayshall adopt an implementing act laying down the methodology for the calculation and verification of the significant reduction in the consumption of the single-use plastic products referred to in paragraph 1. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 16(2).
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The Commission shall publish guidelines on the implementation of any measures, including the distribution of costs, regarding the extended producer responsibility, in accordance with this Article.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. The competent authority shall ensure that the costs on the producers related to the extended producer responsibility shall be proportionate and communicated to those entities affected, on a regular basis and in an accessible, transparent manner.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) establish separate collection targets for relevant extended producer responsibility schemes., or
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) establish any proven garbage collection system that they consider will achieve the targets.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Directive by … [sixfive years after the end-date for transposition of this Directive]. The evaluation shall be based on the information available in accordance with Article 13. Member States shall provide the Commission with any additional information necessary for the purposes of the evaluation and the preparation of the report referred to in paragraph 2.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(c a) the economic impact on the sectors affected is proportionate and in line with projections;
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c b (new)
(c b) the implementation of this Directive has in any way negatively impacted the competitiveness of the sectors that are most affected by this proposal, compared to their non-EU based competitors.
2018/09/06
Committee: ECON