16 Amendments of Jakop G. DALUNDE related to 2016/0047(NLE)
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point - 1 a (new)
Article 1 – point - 1 a (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4
Article 4
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point -1 b (new)
Article 1 – point -1 b (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point -1 c (new)
Article 1 – point -1 c (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
(-1c) Article 8 paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: " Research and technological development (RTD) shall aim to improve steel production processes with a view to enhancing product quality and increasing productivity. Reducing emissions, energy consumption and the environmental impact as well as enhancing the use of raw materials and the conservation of resources shall form an integral part of the improvements sought in ground-breaking technologies. Research projects shall address one or more of the following areas:" (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)Or. en
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
They shall be active in the field concerned and be aware of the industrial priorities and environmental impacts.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 2
Article 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. Within each Advisory Group, the Commission shall aim at ensuring, as far as possible,ensure a high level of expertise, as well as a balanced representation of relevant areas of expertise and, areas of interest (economic and non-economic ones), including civil society groups and a balanced representation of gender and geographical origin, taking into account the specific tasks of the Advisory Groups, the type of expertise required and the outcome of the experts' selection procedure.;
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 2
Article 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Asks the Commission to assess the development of an allowance system that supports underrepresented groups from civil society, such as environmental non- governmental organisations, for a fully effective participation in the expert group.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Members of the Technical Groups shall be selected from experts with competence in research strategy, management or, social or environmental impact and production in the areas referred to in Sections 3 and 4 of Chapter II and who have responded to public call for applications.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
They shall be active in the field concerned and have responsibility for research strategy, management or, social or environmental impact and production in the related sectors.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 3– subparagraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 3– subparagraph 1
Within each Technical Group, the Commission shall aim at ensuringe a high level of professional expertise, and as far as possible,expertise, as well as a balanced representation of relevant areas of expertise, areas of interest (economic and non-economic ones), including civil society groups and a balanced representation of gender and geographical origin, taking into account the specific tasks of the TechnicalAdvisory Groups, the type of expertise required and the outcome of the experts' selection procedure.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall ensure that rules and procedures are in place in order to properly avoid and manage conflicts of interests of members of the Technical Groups entrusted with the assessment of a specific project, including through the implementation of a complaints mechanism. These procedures shall also ensure equal treatment and fairness throughout the whole monitoring process of projects.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 –– point 3
Article 1 –– point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the Commission to provide the maximum transparency possible, including publication of the agenda, background documents, voting records and detailed minutes, including dissenting opinions in line with the recommendation of the European Ombudsman;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 8 a (new)
Article 1 – point 8 a (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 1
Article 38 – paragraph 1
(8a) Article 38, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: 1. The Commission shall carry out a monitoring exercise of the Research Programme, including an assessment of the expected benefits. A report on that exercise shall be issued by the end of 2013, and thereafter every seven years7. These reports shall be made public on the Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS) or corresponding website. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)Or. en
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 8 b (new)
Article 1 – point 8 b (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 2
(8b) Article 38, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: 2. The Commission shall assess the Research Programme on completion of the projects financed during everythe ongoing period of seven years. The benefits of the RTD to society and to the relevant sectors shall also be assessed. The assessment report shall be published. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)Or. en
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 8 c (new)
Article 1 – point 8 c (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 3
Article 38 – paragraph 3
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 9
Article 1 – point 9
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 39
Article 39
For the appointment of independent and highly qualified experts referred to in Article 18, Article 28(2) and Article 38, the provisions set out in Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 (*) shall apply by analogy. Additionally, for expert groups as a whole, the Commission Decision C(2016)3301 final of 30.5.2016 establishing horizontal rules on the creation and operation of Commission expert groups, without prejudice to the results of the European Parliament resolution 2015/2319(INI) on Control of the Register and composition of the Commission`s expert groups.