BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

16 Amendments of Jakop G. DALUNDE related to 2016/0047(NLE)

Amendment 28 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
"(g) (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)(-1) in Article 3 paragraph 1, point g is deleted oil shales;" Or. en
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 30 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point - 1 a (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4
Improving the competitive position(-1a) Article 4 is replaced by the following: Support the restructuring process of Ccommunity coal 1. Research projects shall aim to reduce the total costs of mining production, improve the quality of the products and reducesocial impact of the restructuring of the coal industry and the closure of coal mines in Europe and improve the quality of people in the regions hit by the costrisis of using coalthe coal sector. Research projects shall encompass the entire coal production chain as follows: (a) modern techniques for surveying deposits; (b) integrateindustry restructuring process as follows: (a) Investigation of the necessary comprehensive policy approach in climate, employment, training, social and mine planningdustrial policy for a just transition; (cb) highly efficient, largely auEvaluation of existing and possibly new financial support possibilities to mated excavation and new and existing mining technologies corresponding to the geological characteristics of European hard coal deposits; (d) appropriate support technologies; (e) transport systems; (f) communication and information, transmission, monitoring and process control systems; (g) oriented to the needs of the consumer markets; (h) (i) 2. Research projects shall also aim to achieve scientific and technological progress with a view to gaining a better understanding of the behaviour and control of deposits in relation to rock pressure, gas emissions, the risk of explosion, ventilation and all other factors affecting mining operations. Research projects with these objectives shall present the prospect of results applicable in the short or medium term to a substantial part of Community production. 3. Preference shall be given to projects that promote at least one of the following: (a) integration of individual techniques in systems and methods and the development of integrated mining methods; (b) substantial reduction of production costs; (c) benefits in terms of mine safety and the environment. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)nage labour market transitions, such as a European Fund for a just transition; (c) Special impact analysis of the particular, social, employment and economic challenges brought about by geographic concentrations in numerous regions throughout Europe; (d) Mapping of best practices in social dialogue, workers participation and accompanying measures for the transformation of the labour market and the employment structure in the region, e.g. via targeted agencies specialising on new employment opportunities, training and re-training; (e) Analysis of impact on vulnerable communities, including mitigation efforts to reduce the social and economic costs of transition and involve affected communities and the mining companies based on whole cost accounting including societal cost; power supply services, coal preparation techniques, coal conversion; coal combustion. 2. Research projects shall also aim to map best practices and achieve progress on the process to return to ecological balance and productive use of coal mines, once their mining use is finished. Research projects shall ensure effective rehabilitation of sites characterised by substantial land-use intervention, accumulation of rock and soil slag heaps and lower groundwater levels: (a) Decommissioning of above-ground facilities, buildings and equipment, including the demolition of power plants and mining machinery, and removal of associated waste. (b) Re-cultivation of the land to productive use, such as agriculture and forestry. (c) Remediation of contaminated sites. (d) Development of a self-regulating, water balance, including restoration of ground water to original levels; flooding of surface-mining depressions; and remediation of water quality. (e) Assurance of geotechnical and public safety, e.g. securing open pits and making above-ground land formations stable from landslides. (f) Creation of a master plan for future regional use of former mining activities. 3. Preference shall be given to projects that promote at least one of the following: (a) A n integrated approach to industrial restructuring, socially just labour market transition and environmental rehabilitation; (b) Substantial reduction of costs and environmental benefits for rehabilitation activities; (c) A regional concept for future economic development and the creation of green jobs with an adapted transformation of the employment structure;" Or. en
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 37 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point -1 b (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
"(a) a reduction in emissions from coal utilisation, including capture and storage of CO (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)(-1b) Article 6 paragraph 2, point a is replaced by the following; "(a) a reduction in emissions from coal utilisation;" Or. en
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 43 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point -1 c (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1
(-1c) Article 8 paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: " Research and technological development (RTD) shall aim to improve steel production processes with a view to enhancing product quality and increasing productivity. Reducing emissions, energy consumption and the environmental impact as well as enhancing the use of raw materials and the conservation of resources shall form an integral part of the improvements sought in ground-breaking technologies. Research projects shall address one or more of the following areas:" (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)Or. en
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 57 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
They shall be active in the field concerned and be aware of the industrial priorities and environmental impacts.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 60 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. Within each Advisory Group, the Commission shall aim at ensuring, as far as possible,ensure a high level of expertise, as well as a balanced representation of relevant areas of expertise and, areas of interest (economic and non-economic ones), including civil society groups and a balanced representation of gender and geographical origin, taking into account the specific tasks of the Advisory Groups, the type of expertise required and the outcome of the experts' selection procedure.;
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 61 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 22 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Asks the Commission to assess the development of an allowance system that supports underrepresented groups from civil society, such as environmental non- governmental organisations, for a fully effective participation in the expert group.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 66 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Members of the Technical Groups shall be selected from experts with competence in research strategy, management or, social or environmental impact and production in the areas referred to in Sections 3 and 4 of Chapter II and who have responded to public call for applications.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 69 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
They shall be active in the field concerned and have responsibility for research strategy, management or, social or environmental impact and production in the related sectors.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 70 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 3– subparagraph 1
Within each Technical Group, the Commission shall aim at ensuringe a high level of professional expertise, and as far as possible,expertise, as well as a balanced representation of relevant areas of expertise, areas of interest (economic and non-economic ones), including civil society groups and a balanced representation of gender and geographical origin, taking into account the specific tasks of the TechnicalAdvisory Groups, the type of expertise required and the outcome of the experts' selection procedure.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 72 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall ensure that rules and procedures are in place in order to properly avoid and manage conflicts of interests of members of the Technical Groups entrusted with the assessment of a specific project, including through the implementation of a complaints mechanism. These procedures shall also ensure equal treatment and fairness throughout the whole monitoring process of projects.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 73 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 –– point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the Commission to provide the maximum transparency possible, including publication of the agenda, background documents, voting records and detailed minutes, including dissenting opinions in line with the recommendation of the European Ombudsman;
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 79 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 8 a (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 1
(8a) Article 38, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: 1. The Commission shall carry out a monitoring exercise of the Research Programme, including an assessment of the expected benefits. A report on that exercise shall be issued by the end of 2013, and thereafter every seven years7. These reports shall be made public on the Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS) or corresponding website. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)Or. en
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 80 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 8 b (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 2
(8b) Article 38, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: 2. The Commission shall assess the Research Programme on completion of the projects financed during everythe ongoing period of seven years. The benefits of the RTD to society and to the relevant sectors shall also be assessed. The assessment report shall be published. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)Or. en
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 81 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 8 c (new)
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 38 – paragraph 3
3. In carrying out the monitoring and assessment referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall be assisted by panels of highly qualified experts appointed by the Commission." (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008D0376&from=EN)(8c) Article 38, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: 3. In the light of the recently ratified and now applicable Paris Agreement, a conveyance of the remainder of the fund to the follower of the Horizon 2020 programme shall be envisaged, especially regarding the necessary funding volumes of projects mentioned in Article 8 of the present Decision." Or. en
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 82 #
Jakop G. DALUNDE
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – point 9
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 39
For the appointment of independent and highly qualified experts referred to in Article 18, Article 28(2) and Article 38, the provisions set out in Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 (*) shall apply by analogy. Additionally, for expert groups as a whole, the Commission Decision C(2016)3301 final of 30.5.2016 establishing horizontal rules on the creation and operation of Commission expert groups, without prejudice to the results of the European Parliament resolution 2015/2319(INI) on Control of the Register and composition of the Commission`s expert groups.
2016/10/27
Committee: ITRE
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation