2 Amendments of Gérard ONESTA related to 2009/2006(BUD)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. In this context, takes note ofthat at its meeting on 1 April 2009, the Bureau unanimously approved the re- structuring plan for DG INLO in relation to the maintenance and management of the Parliament's buildings and the creation of specialised central services to improve the quality of budgetary control and of public procurement procedures; acknowledges that Parliament has no choice but to entrust maintenance tasks to external suppliers; underlines that the fundamental choice to be made, also from a budgetary point of view, relates to the level of property expertise a political body such as the Parliament needs to have in- house and which tasks should be entrusted to external suppliers; asks its Bureau to carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of different options before any final decision is takenso as to ensure that the maintenance tasks entrusted to external suppliers will be properly defined and their performance adequately controlled; in this context, notes that the single external report cited deals mainly with building security issues and would prefer to see further background and justifications concerning the other aspects of management and maintenance, maintenance and management issues and how they can be improved;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers essential that the medium to long-term building strategy plan is presented in good time before the first reading in the autumn in order to be able to make the budgetary decisions; cannot agree to any buildings reserve at this stage of the budget procedurasks for further information concerning the amount requested as a reserve and deletes the corresponding appropriations until such details have been given;