BETA

9 Amendments of Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN related to 2016/0359(COD)

Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 a (new)
(34a) Workers and their representatives should be provided with all the documents and information regarding the proposed restructuring plan in order to allow them to undertake an in-depth assessment of the various scenarios. Furthermore, workers and their representatives should be allowed active involvement in all the consultation and approval phases for the definition of the plan and should be guaranteed access to expert advice in connection with the restructuring.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) A full discharge or the end of disqualification after a short period of time are not appropriate in all circumstances, even after carrying out an insolvency procedure, for instance in cases where the debtor is dishonest or has acted in bad faith. Member States should provide clear guidance to judicial or administrative authorities on how to assess the honesty of the entrepreneur. For example, in establishing whether the debtor was dishonest, judicial or administrative authorities may take into account circumstances such as the nature and extent of the debts, the time when these were incurred, the efforts of the debtor to meet the debts and comply with legal obligations including public licensing requirements and proper bookkeeping, and actions on his or her part to frustrate recourse by creditors. Disqualification orders may last longer or indefinitely in situations where the entrepreneur exercises certain professions which are considered sensitive in the Member States or where he or she was convicted for criminal activities. In such cases it would be possible for entrepreneurs to benefit from a discharge of debt, but still be disqualified for a longer period of time or indefinitely from exercising a particular profession.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) 'class formation' means the grouping of affected creditors and equity holders in a restructuring plan in such a way as to reflect the rights and seniority of the affected claims and interests, taking into account possible pre-existing entitlements, liens or inter-creditor agreements, and their treatment under the restructuring plan. For the purpose of adopting a restructuring plan, creditors should be divided into different classes of creditors, where, as a minimum, secured and unsecured claims should be treated in distinct classes, whilst workers should constitute a separate privileged class;
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure that workers’ representatives can communicate concerns to debtors and entrepreneurs about the situation of the business. Member States shall also ensure that workers’ representatives are in a position to have recourse to an independent expert of their choice and are given access to relevant, up-to-date, clear and user-friendly information regarding the situation of the business and the different restructuring strategies being envisaged, including a transfer to worker ownership;
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f – point iii a (new)
(iiia) all organisational aspects and possible consequences on employment levels, emanating from the restructuring plan, including the impact on subsidiaries and subcontractors, on working conditions and remuneration of workers;
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall ensure that, if the plan includes decisions likely to lead to substantial changes in work organisation or in contractual relations, workers who are affected by the restructuring plan shall have the right to vote on it and their approval shall be compulsory for confirmation of the plan.
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to have due regard to the interests of creditors, workers and other stakeholders;
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
(1) The period of time after which over-indebted entrepreneurs may be fully discharged from their debts shall be no longer than threfive years starting from:
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By way of derogation from Articles 19, 20 and 21, Member States mayshall maintain or introduce provisions restricting access to discharge or laying down longer periods for obtaining a full discharge or longer disqualification periods in certain well-defined circumstances and where such limitations are justified by a general interest, in particular where:
2017/11/16
Committee: JURI