7 Amendments of Răzvan POPA related to 2018/0203(COD)
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In order to ensure mutual recognition of digital evidence such evidence taken in a Member State in accordance with its law should not be denied recognition as evidence in other Member States only because of its digital nature.Does not affect the English version.)
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Modern communications technology, in particular videoconferencing which is an important means to simplify and accelerate the taking of evidence, is currently not used to its full potential. Where evidence is to be taken by hearing a person domiciled in another Member State as witness, party or expert, the court should take that evidence directly via videoconference or other available communications technologies, if available to the respective courts, and where it deems the use of such technology appropriate on account of the specific circumstances of the case.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Requests and communications pursuant to this Regulation shall be transmitted through a decentralised IT system composed of national IT systems interconnected by a communication infrastructure and enabling the secure and reliable cross-border exchange of information between the national IT systems.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. If transmission in accordance with paragraph 1 is not possible due to an unforeseen and exceptional disruption of the decentralised IT system or where such transmission is not possible in other exceptional cases, transmission shall be carried out by the swiftest possible means, which that the requested Member State has indicated it canto be acceptable.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
Article 17a – paragraph 1
Article 17a – paragraph 1
1. Where evidence is to be taken by hearing a person domiciled in another Member State as witness, party or expert and the court does not request the competent court of another Member State to take evidence in accordance with Article 1(1)(a), the court shall take evidence directly in accordance with Article 17 via videoconference or other available communications technologies, if available to the respective courts, and where it deems the use of such technology appropriate on account of the specific circumstances of the case.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
Article 17a – paragraph 2
Article 17a – paragraph 2
2. Where a request for direct taking of evidence via videoconference or using other available communication technologies is made, the hearing shall be held in the premises of a court. The requesting court and the central body or the competent authority referred to in Article 3(3) or the court on whose premises the hearing is to be held shall agree on the practical arrangements for the videoconference.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
Article 17a – paragraph 3
Article 17a – paragraph 3
3. Where evidence is taken by videoconference or other available communications technologies: