BETA

Activities of Heinz KINDERMANN

Plenary speeches (40)

EC-Denmark/Greenland fisheries agreement
2016/11/22
Additives in animal nutrition
2016/11/22
Reform of the common agricultural policy
2016/11/22
European aquaculture
2016/11/22
Fisheries
2016/11/22
Additives in animal nutrition
2016/11/22
Common fisheries policy (CFP)
2016/11/22
Foot-and-mouth disease in South Korea
2016/11/22
Green Paper on consumer protection/Contamination of food by nitrofen
2016/11/22
Vote (continuation)
2016/11/22
Foodstuffs
2016/11/22
Fishing fleets
2016/11/22
Circulation of compound feedingstuffs
2016/11/22
Protection of animals during transport
2016/11/22
Community fisheries (1997-2001)
2016/11/22
Classical swine fever
2016/11/22
Protection of pigs
2016/11/22
Animal by-products
2016/11/22
Animal welfare
2016/11/22
Animal feedingstuffs/Vegetable proteins
2016/11/22
Common fisheries policy
2016/11/22
BSE and general ban on animal meal in feedingstuffs
2016/11/22
Compound feedingstuffs
2016/11/22
Beef and beef products
2016/11/22
Identification, registration and labelling of beef
2016/11/22
Additives in feedingstuffs
2016/11/22
Bovine animals and beef: identification, registration and labelling
2016/11/22
BST
2016/11/22
Fisheries
2016/11/22
Baltic Sea cod (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0134(CNS)
Expenditure in the veterinary field (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0098(CNS)
Circulation of compound feedingstuffs (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2006/0117(COD)
Decision on urgent procedure
2016/11/22
EU forestry strategy (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/2054(INI)
Common organisation of the market in sugar – Support schemes for farmers (sugar) – Restructuring the sugar industry (continuation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2005/0118(CNS)
Fisheries control programmes – Community sanctions in the fisheries sector
2016/11/22
Fishery resources in the Baltic Sea, the Belts and the Sound
2016/11/22
European Union general budget for 2006
2016/11/22
Transfers of vessels to countries hit by the tsunami in 2004
2016/11/22
Fisheries Control Agency
2016/11/22

Reports (15)

Report on the proposal for a Council Directive laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens kept in various systems of rearing - Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development PDF (72 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 1998/0092(CNS)
Documents: PDF(72 KB)
Report on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on amending Council Directive 97/12/EC of 17 March 1997 amending and updating Directive 64/432/EEC on health problems affecting inta-Community trade in bovine animals and swine - Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development PDF (11 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 1998/0194(CNS)
Documents: PDF(11 KB)
Report on industrial fisheries - Committee on Fisheries PDF (45 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 1997/2218(INI)
Documents: PDF(45 KB)
Report on the proposal for a Council Regulation on the conclusion of the Protocol establishing, for the period 1 July 1997 to 30 June 2000, the fishing rights and financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea on fishing off the coast of Equatorial Guinea - Committee on Fisheries PDF (54 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 1997/0268(CNS)
Documents: PDF(54 KB)
Report on the proposal for a Council Regulation introducing arrangements for the management of fishing effort in the Baltic Sea - Committee on Fisheries PDF (24 KB)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 1996/0244(CNS)
Documents: PDF(24 KB)
Report on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending for the fourth time Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 laying down criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and for processing and marketing of its products - Committee on Fisheries
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 1996/0124(CNS)
Rapport sur la proposition de règlement du Conseil fixant certaines mesures de contrôle applicables aux activités de pêche exercées dans les eaux de la mer Baltique, des Belts et de l'Øresund - commission de la pêche FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 1995/0223(CNS)
Report on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down measures concerning incidental catches of cetaceans in fisheries and amending Regulation (EC) No 88/98 - Committee on Fisheries PDF (179 KB) DOC (97 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PECH
Dossiers: 2003/0163(CNS)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(97 KB)
Report on the proposal for Council Directive amending Directive 88/407/EEC laying down the animal health requirements applicable to intra-Communit trade in and imports of semen of domestic animals of the bovine species - Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development PDF (250 KB) DOC (102 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AGRI
Dossiers: 2002/0229(CNS)
Documents: PDF(250 KB) DOC(102 KB)
Report on the Annual Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the results of the multi-annual guidance programmes for the fishing fleets at the end of 2000 - Committee on Fisheries PDF (119 KB) DOC (52 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PECH
Dossiers: 2002/2006(COS)
Documents: PDF(119 KB) DOC(52 KB)
Report on the proposal for a Council Regulation laying down the animal-health rules governing the production, placing on the market and importation of products of animal origin intended for human consumption - Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development PDF (268 KB) DOC (166 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AGRI
Dossiers: 2000/0181(CNS)
Documents: PDF(268 KB) DOC(166 KB)
REPORT on the adoption of a European Cormorant Management Plan to minimise the increasing impact of cormorants on fish stocks, fishing and aquaculture PDF (154 KB) DOC (81 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PECH
Dossiers: 2008/2177(INI)
Documents: PDF(154 KB) DOC(81 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive on animal health requirements for aquaculture animals and products thereof, and on the prevention and control of certain diseases in aquatic animals PDF (300 KB) DOC (281 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PECH
Dossiers: 2005/0153(CNS)
Documents: PDF(300 KB) DOC(281 KB)
REPORT Report on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 90/424/EEC on expenditure in the veterinary field PDF (143 KB) DOC (96 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: PECH
Dossiers: 2005/0154(CNS)
Documents: PDF(143 KB) DOC(96 KB)
REPORT on the implementation of a European Union forestry strategy PDF (223 KB) DOC (153 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: AGRI
Dossiers: 2005/2054(INI)
Documents: PDF(223 KB) DOC(153 KB)

Amendments (54)

Amendment 62 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point 24 a (new)
(24a) "Recreational fisheries" means non-commercial fishing activities exploiting living aquatic resources for recreation or sport;
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 64 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point 24 b (new)
(24b) "Recreational fisheries sectors" means a) “Recreational Angling” – also named “sportfishing” (rod and line fishing) – and which takes place from boat, shore or by wading out. Tournament or competition angling is a sub-segment of recreational angling. b) “Other Recreational Fishing”means fishing which takes place from boat, shore or by wading out from shore. Gears are various forms of active or passive/stationary nets, longlines and hand-held lines, traps and pots;
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 67 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point 24 c (new)
(24c) ‘Subsistence fisheries’ means fishing for aquatic animals that contribute substantially to meeting an individual’s or family’s nutritional needs.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 174 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1
1. Recreational fisheries on a vessel in Community waters on a stock subject to a multiannual plan shall be subject to an authorisation for that vessel issued by the flag Member StateFishing mortality in recreational fisheries and subsistence fisheries shall, if necessary, be taken into account in the stock assessments as part of or along with the “natural mortality” before the setting and distribution of the commercial TACs and Quotas.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 178 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Released fish in recreational fisheries shall not be counted as mortality.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 180 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2
2. Catches in recreational fisheries on stocks subject to a multiannual plan shall be registered by the flag Member State.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 187 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3
3. Catches of species subject to a multiannual plan by recreational fisheries shall be counted against the relevant quotas of the flag Member State. The Member States concerned shallan establish a share from suchtheir quotas to be used exclusively for the purpose of recreational fisheries.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 191 #

2008/0216(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The provisions in this Article shall be implemented within two years of the date of entry into force of this regulation.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 163 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) live non-human vertebrate animals, including independently feeding larval forms and embryonic or foetal forms as from the last third of their normal development;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 169 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) live invertebrate animals, including independently feeding larval forms, of those species listed in Annex I.;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 175 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Where an internationally accepted and validated method of testing not involving the use of animals exists and may be used in placestead of a procedure, Member States shall ensure that the alternative method is used. Pursuant to this Directive, testing methods which involve the use of human embryonic and foetal cells shall not be regarded as alternatives.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 187 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. the protection of human health in the context of workers' or consumers' exposure to chemicals;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 198 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the procedure has one of the purposes referred to in points (2)(a1), (2), (3) or (5) of Article 5;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 199 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) as far as possible, the animals used should be bred specifically for testing purposes;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 203 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase
1. NGiven their particularly high level of neurophysiological sensitivity and cognitive development, non-human primates shall not be used in procedures, with the exception of those procedures meeting the following conditions:
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 204 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the procedure has one of the purposes referred to in points (1), (2)(a), (3) and is undertaken with a view to the avoidance, prevention, diagnosis or treatment of life- threatening or debilitating clinical conditions in human beings or the purpose referred to in pointor (5) of Article 5;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 208 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) there i applicant provides a scientific justification that the purpose of the procedure cannot be achieved by the use of other species than non-human primates.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 216 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
However, as from the dates set out in Annex III, Member States shall ensure that non-human primates listed in that Annex may only be used in procedures where they are the offspring of non- human primates which have been bred in captivity.deleted
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 226 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that a procedure is not carried out if another scientifically satisfactory method or testing strategy of obtaining the result sought, not entailing the use of an animal, is recognised by Community legislation. In the absence of such a method, a procedure may not be carried out if a scientifically satisfactory method or testing strategy for obtaining the result sought, including computer supported, in vitro and other methodologies, not entailing the use of an animal, is reasonably and practicably available.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 240 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the procedures which are classified as "severe" are not performed ifnd which are likely to prolong the pain, suffering or distress is likely to be prolongedare performed only if it has been scientifically proven that the testing purpose cannot be achieved in another way and a positive ethical assessment has been carried out.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 248 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase
1. Member States shall ensure that an animal already used in a procedure, when a different animal on which no procedures hasve previously been carried out could also be used, may be re-used in asubsequent unconnected new procedures only when all of the following conditions are met:it is established that it serves the principles of avoiding, reducing and refining animal experiments.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 252 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the previous procedure was classified as 'up to mild';deleted
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 255 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) it is demonstrated that its general state of health and well-being has been fully restordeleted;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 256 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the distress suffered by the animal in the course of a new procedure is less than the distress suffered in the course of the previous procedure or less than the distress which would be suffered by a new animal;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 257 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the further procedure is classified as 'up to mild' or 'non-recovery'.deleted
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 262 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the competent authority, on the basis of scientific justification, may allow re-use of an animal as long as the animal is not used more than once after having undergone a procedure entailing severe pain, distress or equivalent suffering and the further procedure is classified as 'up to mild' or as 'non-recovery'.deleted
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 264 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. A procedure shall be deemed to end when no further observations are to be made for that procedure or, as regards new genetically modified animal lines, when lack of adverse effects to animals can be scientifically demonstratthe second breeding generation is reached.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 271 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. All authorisations of persons shall be granted for a limited period of time, not exceeding five years. Member States shall ensure that the renewal of an authorisation of persons is only granted on the basis of demonstration of the requisite competence.deleted
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 277 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that each breeding, supplying and user establishment sets up a permanentnames a qualified person who is responsible for ethical review body.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 304 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 35 – paragraph 2a (new)
2a. Member States may permit exceptions from the authorisation requirement for projects required by law.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 307 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 36 –paragraph 1 – point ca (new)
(ca) a scientifically justified statement that the research project is indispensable and ethically defensible and that the purposes of the project cannot be achieved using other methods or procedures.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 313 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory sentence
1. The ethical evaluationBefore authorisation is granted, it shall be verifyied that the project as described and scientifically justified by the applicant meets the following criteria:
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 317 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b
(fb) the purposes of the project justify the use of animals and cannot be achieved through other methods or procedures;
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 318 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point c
(gc) the project is designed so as to enable procedures to be carried out win the most humane andaximum respect for animal welfare and in the most environmentally sensitive manner.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 322 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 3 – introductory sentence
3. The competent authority carrying out the ethical evaluation shall consider corresponding expertsise in particular in the following areas:
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 324 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. Ethical evaluation shall be performed in a transparent manner, by integrating the opinion of independent partiesby integrating independent expertise whilst safeguarding intellectual property and confidential information.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 332 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 38 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) whether there are elements that may contribute to the further implementation of the requirement of replacement, reduction and refinement.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 346 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 41 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may allow the authorisation of multiple projects when those projects are required by law, or when standardised procedures are applied, the ethical assessment of which has already produced a positive result.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 356 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the decision to grant an authorisation is taken and communicated to the user establishment at the latest within 360 days from the submission of the application. Should the Member State fail to take a decision within that period, the authorisation shall be deemed to have been granted, where the project concerned involves only procedures classified as "up to mild" and non-human primates are not used. In all other cases, no such presumption shall apply.
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 360 #

2008/0211(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 43 – paragraph 2
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, in exceptional circumstances and where the project is non-routine, multi-disciplinary and innovative, the decision to grant an authorisation shall be taken and communicated to the user establishment within 60 days from the submission of the application.deleted
2009/03/16
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 13 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Citation 1
– Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 3708 thereof,
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 14 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 2
(2) The objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) as defined in Article 33(1) of the Treaty include stabilising the markets as well as ensuring that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. Over the years the food distribution plans implemented under the scheme have successfully underpinned the fulfilment of both objectives and, byhelped to reducinge the food insecurity of the most deprived persons in the Community, have proven to be an essential tool contributing to guarantee broad availabi. However, the predominant use of foods purchased on the market in recent times means that these distribution plans have evolved from an agricultural politcy of food within the Community while reducing the intervention stockstool into a social policy tool.
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 16 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 4
(4) The successive enlargements of the Community have increased the potential number of beneficiaries of food aid schemes in the Community. At the same time rising food prices have negatively affected the food security of the most deprived persons and increased the cost of providing the food aid. As a result, the importancuse of the scheme originally set up under Regulation (EEC) No 3730/87 hwas grown, over the years. It is therefore essential to continue the scheme at Community level and further adapt it to changing market developments, more and more clearly at odds with the legal basis chosen (Article 37 of the Treaty).
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 19 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 5
(5) The current food distribution scheme relies on the distribution of products from Community intervention stocks supplemented, on a temporary basis, by purchases on the market. However, successive reforms of the CAP and favourable developments of producer prices have resulted in a progressive reduction in intervention stocks, as well as the range of products available. Consequently, market purchases should also be made a permanent source of supply for the scheme to complement intervention stocks, where suitable intervention stocks are not availableThe subsequent practice that emerged of keeping the scheme supplied mainly through market purchases is not covered by the legal basis (Article 37 of the Treaty).
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 22 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 6
(6) A Community scheme cannot constitute the sole response to the growing needs for food aid in the Community. National policies implemented by public administrations and the mobilisation of civil society are equ, above ally, necessary to provide food security for the most deprived. Since the Treaty contains no special provisions for powers to adopt appropriate measures to provide food security for the most deprived, the necessary measure should be taken on the basis of Article 308 of the Treaty. A Community scheme with a strong cohesive element might, however, serve as a model for the distribution of food to the most deprived, help create synergies and encourage public and private initiatives aimed at increasing the food security of persons in need. Furthermore, given the geographical dispersion of the reduced available intervention stocks in the Member States, it can contribute to their best use. The Community scheme should therefore also be without prejudice to any such national policies.
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 24 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 7
(7) In order to fully benefit from the cohesive dimension of the Community scheme and reinforce the synergies thereby created, and in order to ensure proper planning, provision should be made for Member States to co-finance the food distribution programme. Maximum Community co-financing rates should be provided for and the Community financial contribution should be added to the list of measures eligible for financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) set out in Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. Higher co-financing rates should apply in the first years of application of the revised scheme in order to ensure the continued high take-up of funds, the gradual phase in of co-financing, to allow for a smooth transition and to avoid the risk of discontinuation of the scheme due to a possible lack of resources.
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 26 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1
Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
"(g) the Community's financial contribution up to EUR 307 million to food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community provided for in Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007."
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 27 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 2 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
(1) Products in intervention stocks shall be made available or food products shall be purchased on the market so that food products may be distributed to the most deprived persons in the Community through organisations designated by Member States. Food products may also be purchased on the market. The proportion of food products purchased on the market should not exceed the proportion of products from intervention stocks.
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 40 #

2008/0183(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 2 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007
Article 27 – paragraph 7
The Community co-financing rate shall not exceed: (a) for the three-year plan starting on 1 January 2010, 75% of the eligible costs, or 85% of the eligible costs in the Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund for the period 2007-2013, as listed in Annex I to Commission Decision 2006/596/EC*; (b) for subsequent three year plans, 50% of the eligible costs, or 75% of the eligible costs in the Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund in a given year, as listed in Annex I to Decision 2006/596/EC and in subsequent decisions.
2009/01/29
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 42 #

2008/0105(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 3
Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005
Article 16 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Member States may base their choice on the indicative list of types of operations set out in Annex II of this Regulation and/or any other types of operations, including those in the area of inland fisheries, provided that those operations are linked to the priorities referred to in the first subparagraph and are aimed at achieving the potential effects specified in Annex II.
2008/09/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 54 #

2008/0105(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005
Article 36 – point a)
(4a) The introduction to Article 36(a) is replaced by the following: "(a) measures targeting the sustainable use of agricultural land, including inland fisheries, through:"
2008/09/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 344 #

2008/0103(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a ) By derogation from paragraph 2, a Member State or region may decide for a given calendar year to lower the reductions resulting from paragraph 2 by an amount corresponding to the wages paid to employees liable for social security contributions on each farm in the calendar year in question. The Member States or regions shall be permitted to base this amount on a standardised value.
2008/09/02
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 20 #

2007/0223(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. TIn the case of tuna fishing, transhipments between third country fishing vessels or between the latter and vessels flying the flag of a Member State shall be prohibited in Community waters and shall take place only in port, in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.
2008/04/24
Committee: PECH
Amendment 21 #

2007/0223(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Vessels flying the flag of a Member State shall not be authorised to tranship at sea tuna catches from third country fishing vessels outside Community waters.
2008/04/24
Committee: PECH