BETA

7 Amendments of Evelyne GEBHARDT related to 2011/2024(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 19 February 2009 on the creation of a European professional card for service providers,
2011/09/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas ensuring that the system for the recognition of professional qualifications is designed in the best possible way is a prerequisite for enabling everyone to fully enjoy the benefits of freedom of movement;
2011/09/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas most professional groups should be able to obtain a European professional card, in order to facilitate mobility;
2011/09/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the introduction of a European professional card could simplify and speed up the process for recognising professional qualifications;
2011/09/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that Member States should regulate professions in a more proportionate manner, with a view to reducing the total number of regulated professions in the EU, setting aside the healthcare sector;
2011/09/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that the concept of a voluntary Professional Card, which must be linked to an electronic database such as the IMI, could be a useful tool to aid mobility for somealls on the European Commission to develop a concept for a European professionsal card; stresses that any card introduced must meet specific conditions and that thesafeguards necessary safeguards must be establishedin this connection should be discussed, taking account of existing instruments, such as the IMI;
2011/09/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission, prior to the introduction of any card, to provide evidence, through a thorough impact assessment, of the possible added value for the recognition process, beyond that provided by an enhanced IMI, of a voluntary card for certain professionals and competent authorities; argues that the impact assessment must address the concerns raised in the consultation and by numerous other stakeholders, assess the merits of an ‘e-card’, provide a cost- benefit analysis, specify its potential features and explain exactly how data protection and consumer safety would be ensured;deleted
2011/09/22
Committee: IMCO