BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

9 Amendments of Evelyne GEBHARDT related to 2015/2089(INI)

Amendment 14 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the principle of subsidiarity is an essential element and must represent the starting poimust be an important element for policy formulation;
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 20 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the deadlines involved in the subsidiarity mechanism are too short to ensure that parliaments always have time to consider in detail aspects of implementation or other practical matters; considers, therefore, that parliaments should be afforded more time to respond; considers, as well, that a stronger ‘red card’ procedure should be introduced, allowing proposals to be rejected on grounds of lack of conformity with subsidiarity;deleted
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 27 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that, where the need for European regulation can be demonstrated, the institutions should jointly undertake to ensure thatShall ensure that European regulation complies with the principles of proportionality, as well as the principles of simplicity, transparency, coherence and respect for fundamental rights, are reflected in the drafting of the relevant legislation;
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 33 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that single market legislation should be to the benefit of the creation of sustainable, high-quality jobs, competitiveness, innovation and growth, and views effective impact assessments as an important tool for informing policymakers on how best to design regulationregulation might be designed in order to achieve these aims and their single market objectives; also stresses that every impact assessment must aim to evaluate the social, economic and environmental consequences of a legislative proposal;
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Points out that the impact assessment accompanying a proposal should be seen as a ‘living document’ that is kept up to date and that corresponds to the choices made by the co-legislators at the various stages of negotiations before the final political decision is taken;deleted
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates its position that consultation processes should be opened up and expanded to include submissions on draft impact assessments; believes this is equally important for secondary legislation, which is of great consequence for the implementation of single marketregulation and which therefore requires greater transparency and scrutiny;deleted
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 59 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Considers consultation to be an ongoing process rather than an occasional exercise; reiterates, in this regard, its calls on the Commission to consider the establishment of a Stakeholder Forum;deleted
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 105 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Notes that the cumulative cost of regulation often represent barriers for participants in the single market, particularly for SMEs; welcomes, therefore, the commitment by the Commission to examine this issue; underlines, however, that any such analysis should only address economic factors and should not be equated with a broader impact assessment, which includes assessments of other elements;
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 110 #
Evelyne GEBHARDT
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Notes that legislation, once adopted, remains largely static and that incentives to respond to, and repeal, outdated legislation are often lacking, while consumer issues and market problems rise and fall as conditions change; considers, therefore, that sunset clauses should be used more often, whereby the institutions could commit to keep legislation up to date and in place only where necessary; views safeguards as a necessary means of ensuring that essential legislation does not lapse;deleted
2015/06/10
Committee: IMCO
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation