8 Amendments of Evelyne GEBHARDT related to 2020/2015(INI)
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas AI technologies may render the traceability and application of IPRs to AI-generated output difficult thus hindering the fair remuneration of human creators whose original work is used to power such technologies;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of protecting IPRs, including trade secrets, in any regulatory framework for AI, in particular as regards any detailed requirements for the narrow set of applications deemed ‘high-risk’; stresses, however, that the protection of intellectual property and trade secrets must always be reconciled with other fundamental rights and freedoms, in particular the right to freedom of expression and freedom of the press; urges, therefore, that the necessary protection be given to whistleblowers and investigative journalists uncovering AI- related irregularities with significant social and macro-economic implications;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas AI-generated output including but not limited to synthetic content can enable novel artistic genres and create various commercial opportunities in the creative industries;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas AI technologies are heavily dependent on data, a blanket term for information falling into a range of categories that requires protection and tailored governance; whereas increased access to certain data and databases in the European Union will play a crucial role in advancing the development of European AI; whereas specific rules regarding governance and transparency of data used in developing, deploying, training and using of AI technologies is needed to increase the quality of data throughout the entire lifecycle of an AI-enabled system;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that creating an environment conducive to creativity and innovation by encouraging the use of AI technologies by creators must not come at the expense of the interests of human creators whose copyright work may be used during the developing, deploying, training and using of AI-enabled systems; recommends that efforts to encourage the use of AI technologies must be limited to those who comply with the Union’s ethical principles and the relevant regulatory framework underpinning the development, deployment and use of AI;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Takes the view that consideration must be given to protecting technical and artistic creations generated by AI, in order to encourage this form of creation; considers that for AI-generated content derivative of underlying data protected by copyright ,authorisation of the copyright holders is required unless otherwise permitted by regulatory exceptions; considers that certain works generated by AI can be regarded as equivalent to intellectual works and could therefore be protected by copyright; recommends that ownership of rights be assigned to the person who prepares and publishes a work lawfully, provided that the technology designer has not expressly reserved the right to use the work in that way;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Highlights that establishing a legal requirement to maintain an auditable record of data used throughout the lifecycle of AI-enabled technologies upon a developer, deployer or user of such technologies will enable a more precise tracing process and ensure that AI- generated output containing or deriving from protected copyright respects the rights of copyrights holders;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Recommends this legal requirement be extended to cover data containing or deriving from images and/or video containing biometric data of any individuals to ensure that the right to privacy is respected; stresses that such a legal requirement is central to enabling the establishment of a legal framework which encourages non-discriminatory and trustworthy AI-generated output with respect to third party rights of privacy and copyright;