7 Amendments of Evelyne GEBHARDT related to 2020/2073(INL)
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Acknowledges that real time blocking of websites affects the fundamental rights of internet users and service providers; stresses, in this regard, that blocking injunctions must be subject to the principle of proportionality and strike a fair balance between the protection of intellectual property on the one hand, the freedom of expression and information, the freedom to conduct business, as well as the fundamental rights to privacy and to data protection on the other;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that real-time blocking may render large quantities of information on the internet inaccessible and must therefore be limited to cases where the unlawfulness of the specific broadcast has been established beyond doubt by an independent judicial body;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Stresses that the fundamental rights of individuals and consumers and service providers, including the rights to freedom of expression, privacy and protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business and the right to an effective remedy, cannot be undermined by the enforcement of copyright of sports events’ organisers;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 1 – indent 5
Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 1 – indent 5
- to explore the possibilities of harmoniseing the use of swift and adaptable blocking procedures in the event of repeated violations already established allowing for court-ordered real-time blocking of access to illegal online transmissions of live sport events , based on the model of “live” blocking orders and “dynamic injunctions”;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 1 – indent 7
Annex I – part 1 – paragraph 1 – indent 7
- to ensure that the measures to be proposed are proportionate and keep the right balance between the need for the enforcement measures to be efficient and the need to protect third party rights, including service providers, fans and consumers whose fundamental rights to freedom of expression and information, privacy and protection of personal data, the right to conduct a business and the right to an effective remedy, cannot be undermined by the enforcement of copyright of sport events’ organisers;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2
- allow for real-time take down procedures targeting illegal live sport content, provided that a competent judicial body establishes that there are no doubts about the ownership of the right concerned and the fact that the transmission was not authorised;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
Annex I – part 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 3
- ensure that the measures to be taken by intermediaries are effective, justified, proportionate, adequate, taking into account the seriousness and the scale of the infringement, as well as the seriousness of the interference with fundamental rights of service providers and internet users, whilst fully respecting the principles of the Directive on electronic commerce and the future Digital Services Act; make sure, for example, that the blocking of access to, or removal of, illegal content does not require the general monitoring of content, the blocking of entire IP addresses under which different domains can be hosted, or the blocking of an entire platform containing services that are legal, which would be disproportionate, unless the proportion of illegal services on a specific server demonstrates that the availability of legal services is only incidental;