8 Amendments of Markus FERBER related to 2015/2106(INI)
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that a sound and robust CMU has to acknowledge the interdependencies with other financial sectors and has to be based on well-established existing structures; stresses the need for a holistic view of EU financial services regulation; stresses the need for a framework for the third country regime;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that consumer protection does not necessarily entail large volumes of information and that the focus should rather be on the quality and comprehensibility of information; is concerned that the multiplicity of customer information might not ultimately serve real customer needs; points to the necessity of a European initiative for more and better financial education;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes the achievements in establishing a banking union; stresses that the next step has to be its full implementation, including full capitalisation of national Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) and the Single Resolution Fund (SRF); emphasises the aim of avoiding moral hazard and ensuring that risk-takers bear the costs when their risks materialisthe principle of liability remains a guiding theme;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses that, in the interest of good regulation, particularly in the case of the banking union there is a need first of all to look carefully at how measures such as the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive work in practice before introducing new measures into the debate;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Stresses the importance of rapidly implementing measures already adopted, such as the introduction of SME growth markets by Directive 2014/65/EU, since these measures accompany the objectives of the Capital Market Union;
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Highlights the need for better quality and cross-sectoral co-ordination in the Commission’s or the ESAs’ drafts and drafting processes, encompassing timing, prioritisation and the avoidance of overlaps, as well as any duplication of the basic act in delegated acts;
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Regrets that in the past the supervisory authorities, in drawing up implementing acts, have not always adhered to the mandate set out by the European legislature;
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Emphasises that an early legal review by the Commission should not reduce either the transparency of the process vis- à-vis Parliament or Parliament’s right of consultation; requests that during the drafting process the ESAs provide Parliament with provisional draftsregularly, comprehensively and without delay with interim information on the progress of the work;