BETA

5 Amendments of Markus FERBER related to 2016/2224(INI)

Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas some Member States already have experience with central repositories for reporting actual or possible breaches of financial prudential rules;
2017/07/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to present horizoanalyse the experience that has been gained in some Member States with central legislation to protect whistle- blowers as soon as possiblerepositories for reporting breaches of regulatory provisions and to derive best- practice recommendations from that analysis;
2017/07/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Points out the need to ensure that whistle-blowers are able to report not only illegal activities but also wrongdoing and any information in the public interestonly;
2017/07/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Argues that whistle-blowers should be free to report both internally, within the workplace, and externally, and should be protected regardless of their choice of reporting channelreport possible breaches of statutory provisions to the relevant central repositories;
2017/07/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that whistle-blowers should not bear the burden of proof when it comes to demonstrating that they acted in good faith, as what matters is whether the information disclosed is in the public interest, or exposes wrongdoing and other misconduct;deleted
2017/07/19
Committee: ECON