BETA

12 Amendments of Markus FERBER related to 2021/0343(COD)

Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Article 12a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 provides that global systemically important institution (G-SII) groups with a resolution strategy under which more than one group entity might be resolved (Multiple Point of Entry (MPE) resolution strategy) are to calculate their risk-based requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities under the theoretical assumption that only one entity of the group would be resolved, with the losses and recapitalisation needs of any subsidiaries of that group being transferred to the resolution entity (Single Point of Entry (SPE) resolution strategy). In line with the TLAC standard, that calculation should take into account all third-country entities belonging to a G-SII that would be resolution entities were they established in the Union, that is, entities which, according to the decision of the third- country resolution authority, are planned to enter into third-country resolution proceedings in case of failure.
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) According to Article 72e(4), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, resolution authorities may permit a G-SII with an MPE resolution strategy to deduct certain holdings of own funds and eligible liabilities instruments of its subsidiaries that do not belong to the same resolution group by deducting a lower, adjusted amount specified by the resolution authority. Article 72e(4), second subparagraph, of that Regulation requires that in such cases, the difference between the adjusted amount and the original amount is deducted from the loss absorbing and recapitalisation capacity of the subsidiaries concerned. In line with the TLAC standard, that approach should take into account the risk-based and non-risk- based requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities of the subsidiary concerned. Furthermore, that approach should be applicable to all third-country subsidiaries belonging to that G-SII, as long as those subsidiaries are subject to a local resolution regime that is equivalent to internationally agreed standardsaccording to the relevant EU resolution authority is materially at least fully equivalent to internationally agreed standards, more specifically the Financial Stability Board’s ‘Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions’1a and the TLAC standard, and where the third-country resolution authorities have issued decisions that the third-country subsidiaries of that G-SII are planned to enter into third-country resolution proceedings in case of failure. __________________ 1aFinancial Stability Board, Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions, 15.10.2014.
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The indirect subscription of internal MREL eligible instruments should ensure that, when a subsidiary reaches the point of non-viability, losses are effectively passed on to, and the subsidiary concerned is recapitalised by, the resolution entity. Those losses should thus not be absorbed by the intermediate parent, which should become a mere vehicle to pass through those losses to the resolution entity. Consequently, and to ensure that the outcome of the indirect subscription is equivalent to that of a full direct subscription, as envisaged under the mandate set out in Article 45f(6) of Directive 2014/59/EU, the deducted exposures should receive a 0 % risk weight for the calculation of the total risk exposure amount and be excluded from the calculation of the total exposure measure. This treatment of not applying risk weights and excluding those exposures from the total exposure measure should strictly be limited to exposures that are deducted in accordance to Article 72e(5), first subparagraph, for the sake of operationalising the approach of indirect subscription of internal MREL eligible instruments.
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The templates for the public disclosure of harmonised information on the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities and on the requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities for material subsidiaries of non- EU G-SIIs set out in Commission Implementing Regulation(EU) 2021/7631a should be amended to reflect the new deduction regime for internal MREL eligible instruments. The disclosure templates should also be amended to include the total risk exposure amount and the total exposure measure that intermediate entities would have if they did not exclude the exposures deducted under that new deduction regime. __________________ 1a Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/763 of 23 April 2021 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (OJ L 168,12.5.2021, p. 1).
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) To ensure that institutions have sufficient time to implement the dedicated treatment for the indirect subscription of instruments eligible for internal MREL, including the new deduction regime, the provisions laying down that treatment should become applicable six months after the entry into force of this Regulation. and that markets can digest additional issuances of internal MREL eligible resources, where needed, the provisions laying down that treatment should become applicable on 1 January 2024, in line with the deadline for compliance with the final MREL requirements.
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 72 e – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
4. Where an EU parent institution or a parent institution in a Member State that is subject to Article 92a has direct, indirect or synthetic holdings of own funds instruments or eligible liabilities instruments of one or more subsidiaries which are resolution entities or which are third-country entities planned to enter into third-country resolution proceedings in case of failure which do not belong to the same resolution group as that parent institution, the resolution authority of that parent institution, after duly considering the opinion of the resolution authorities or relevant third-country authorities of any subsidiaries concerned, may permit the parent institution to deduct such holdings by deducting a lower amount specified by the resolution authority of that parent institution. That adjusted amount shall be at least equal to the amount (m) calculated as follows:
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 72 e – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 9
ri = the ratio applicable to subsidiary i at the level of its resolution group in accordance with Article 92a(1), point (a), of this Regulation and Article 45c(3), first subparagraph, point (a), of Directive 2014/59/EU or, for third-country subsidiaries, an materially at least fully equivalent resolution requirement applicable to subsidiary i in the third country where it has its head office, insofar as that requirement is met with instruments that would be considered own funds or eligible liabilities under this Regulation;
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 72 e – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 11
wi = the ratio applicable to subsidiary i at the level of its resolution group in accordance with Article 92a(1), point (b), of this Regulation and of Article 45c(3), first subparagraph, point (b), of Directive 2014/59/EU or, for third-country subsidiaries, an materially at least fully equivalent resolution requirement applicable to subsidiary i in the third country where it has its head office, insofar as that requirement is met with instruments that would be considered own funds or eligible liabilities under this Regulation;
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 113 – paragraph 1
1. To calculate risk-weighted exposure amounts, risk weights shall be applied to all exposures, unless the exposure amounts are deducted from own funds or subject to the treatment set out in Article 72e(5), first subparagraph, in accordance with the provisions of Section 2. The application of risk weights shall be based on the exposure class to which the exposure is assigned and, to the extent specified in Section 2, its credit quality. Credit quality may be determined by reference to the credit assessments of ECAIs or the credit assessments of export credit agencies in accordance with Section 3.;
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 151 – paragraph 1
1. The risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit risk for exposures belonging to one of the exposure classes referred to in Article 147(2), points (a) to (e) and point (g), shall, unless the exposure amounts are deducted from own funds or subject to the treatment set out in Article 72e(5), first subparagraph, be calculated in accordance with Sub-section 2.;
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(q) the exposure amounts that are subject to the treatment set out in Article 72e(5), first subparagraph.
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
However, Article 1, point (3), point (5)(b), and points (7), (8) and (9) and Article 2 shall apply from [OP please insert the date = 6 months after date of entry into force]1 January 2024.
2022/01/12
Committee: ECON