182 Amendments of Aleksander GABELIC
Amendment 3 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
Amendment 4 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
– having regard to the declaration of 10 April 2018 by 221 EU Member States and Norway on the establishment of a European Blockchain Partnership8 , after which five more Member States have joined the Partnership, adding up to the current number of 27 signatory countries, _________________ 8 https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single- market/en/news/european-countries-join- blockchain-partnership
Amendment 5 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission's launch of the EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum on 1 February 20182a, _________________ 2a http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP- 18-521_en.htm
Amendment 19 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas blockchain can improve transparency and traceability throughout the supply chain, streamline customs checks and regulatory compliance, reduce transaction costs, and strengthen the immutability and security of data, and could function as a tool to combat corruption;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas blockchain in the area of international trade is still evolving and therefore needs an innovation-friendly, enabling and encouraging approach that provides legal certainty, while at the same time promoting consumer, investor and environmental protection, increasing the social value of the technology, reducing the digital divide and improving the digital skills of citizens;
Amendment 28 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses regret that EU FTAs are underutilisednot fully utilised and supports analysis of technical solutions that may increase FTA utilisation and exports; notes that exporters could upload all their documents to a public authority application underpinned by blockchain, and instantly prove their compliance with preferential treatment granted by the FTA;
Amendment 34 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that blockchain has the potential to support the trade and sustainable development agenda by providing trust in the provenance of raw materials and goods; stresses the increasing demand from consumers who want to know where goods are coming from and know the conditions under which the goods were produced; stresses that blockchain could contribute to the sustainability work of companies and promote responsible business conduct;
Amendment 38 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that blockchain could contribute to improved consumer protection through encouraging more transparent and traceable value chains, which may contribute to detect fraud, promote verifiability and transparency for goods protected by intellectual property rights, and combat trade in counterfeited goods;
Amendment 41 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that MRAs of AEOs enable businesses to diversify their supply chains; feelbelieves that blockchain offers the potential to reduce the uncertainty associated with implementing MRAs of AEOs, through a seamless exchange of data;
Amendment 48 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the adoption of blockchain technologies throughout the supply chain can increase the volume of global trade, and can lead to increased consumer protection and confidence in digital trade;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises cross-border data flows as an integral functionnecessary for international trade and the design of blockchain architecture; recognises the growing importance of cross-border data flows both within the EU and globally;
Amendment 80 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Highlights the benefits blockchain could bring to SMEs by allowing peer-to- peer communication, collaboration tools and payments, increasing the ease of doing business; recognises the need for ensuring that the development of blockchain in international trade is SME inclusive;
Amendment 82 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Subheading 5
Interoperability and, scalability and interactions with related technologies
Amendment 84 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Considers the possible interactions of blockchain technologies with other innovations in particular, for international trade, with the Internet of Things in developing sensors for transported goods; underlines the need to analyse the risks and opportunities connected with its developments;
Amendment 91 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to follow developments in the area of blockchain, in particular the ongoing pilots/initiatives in the international supply chain and external aspects of customs; invites the Commission to produce a strategy document on adopting blockchain technologies in trade and supply chain management;
Amendment 94 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Commission to further analyse the practical uses of blockchain in international trade; believes that uncertainty regarding juridical and governance aspects of blockchain is an important concern; encourages further analysis of these issues through policy labs and through inclusive platforms for dialogue and exchange of practices; encourages the Commission and national competent authorities to build up technical and juridical expertise in the area of blockchain in international trade;
Amendment 97 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Calls on the Commission to engage in, support and promote research in the area of blockchain in international trade, in this regard, recalls the Parliament’s position on the importance of promoting female participation in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) and of closing gender gaps in access to and in the use of new technologies; demands that the gender perspective is incorporated in all digital initiatives, ensuring that that the ongoing digital transformation also becomes a driving force for gender equality, which is essential for Europe's long-term growth and prosperity;
Amendment 98 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Calls on the Commission to raise awareness about blockchain and its potential in international trade, to undertake initiatives for information spreading, education of citizens, and competence building regarding blockchain technology, and to address the problem of the digital gap between Member States; calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop and pursue digital skills training and retraining strategies in order to ensure society’s active and inclusive participation in changes coming from the digital transformation;
Amendment 100 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to develop a set of guiding principles tailored to industry to provide a level of certainty that encourages the use of blockchain and innovation in this areafor blockchain application in international trade, in order to provide the industry, including SMEs, with a sufficient level of certainty that encourages the use of blockchain while still promoting innovation; believes that such guidelines should promote blockchain in suitable areas that may benefit from the technology;
Amendment 106 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Commission to examine ways in which blockchain could support trade and sustainable development; recalls the Parliament’s position that measures flanking an EU digital trade strategy should be fully in line with and contribute to the realisation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG5 on gender equality and women empowerment;
Amendment 108 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to assess the optimality of blockchain architecture that keeps private data off the chain; recognises the importance of cross-border data flows for growth and jobs, and repeats that any future trade policy provisions on cross-border transfers of data must be subject to the consent of the Parliament and safeguard EU citizens’ fundamental rights;
Amendment 111 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Encourages the Commission to collaborate with and contribute to the work of international organisations and feed into current projects on producing a set of standards and principles to underpin regulation aimed at facilitating the use of blockchain;
Amendment 113 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Commission to play an active role in the process of standardisation and security of blockchain, and to work with the industrieMembers States, public sectors, industries, trade unions, civil society and other stakeholders to develop blockchain standards, including terminology, development, and deployment of the technology;
Amendment 116 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to work with relevant stakeholders in order to review and develop a framework for addressing challenges to interoperability and compatibility between blockchain systems;
Amendment 117 #
2018/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Reminds the Commission that the European Union has an opportunity to become a leading actor in the field of blockchain and international trade, and should be an influential actor in shaping its development globally together with international partners;
Amendment 7 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU Trade Agreement with Colombia and Peru (the Agreement) is a rules-based relationship, anchored on common values and international standards for sustainable development, that has the potential of having a strong positive impact on the socio-economic development of the parties to the Agreement, on economic integration, on sustainable development, human rights and on bringing the countries and their citizens closer together;
Amendment 14 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls the importance of strengthening cooperation to preserve and to reinforce the multilateral trade system, as an essential pillar to achieve the SDG and to ensure an economic governance based on rules, ensuring a more fair, inclusive and sustainable trade; in particular, recalls its support for the WTO, stressing its role in creating economic stability and supporting growth and development, and calls on the Parties to make use of the dialogue fostered by the Agreement to identify and to develop joint strategies towards the necessary modernization of the WTO;
Amendment 15 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the opportunity that the Agreement offers to reinforce cooperation andnot only interregional, but also interaregional cooperation and trade between Colombia, Peru and Ecuador;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the integration of Ecuador into the Agreement and stresses the constructive role played in this process by Colombia and Peru, as an additional element to help strengthening regional integration, and stresses the constructive role played all parties to make of this process a success; recalls that the Agreement is still open to further accessions;
Amendment 18 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is of the opinion that the Agreement is an opportunity to foster the peace agreement in ColombiaRecalls the potential benefits and the need to make the best possible use of the Agreement to help implementing the peace agreement and reconciliation process in Colombia, including specific challenges such as the diversification of the economy, productive development or the implementation of the land-use planning; Recalls that continuous and structured support to, and dialogue with, civil society is also key for the sustainability of peace from the ground up, particularly in rural areas;
Amendment 41 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that the Agreement has contributed to the modernisation and diversification of exports from Colombia and Peru and that it has had a positive impact on Colombian and Peruvian SMEs; Calls on the Parties to provide with regular and accurate data on the sectors and the degree of consolidation of the SMEs' activities to this regard;
Amendment 47 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Takes the view that many SMEs in the EU, Colombia and Peru are not aware of the opportunities that the Agreement brings; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member StatParties to study the preference utilisation rate of SMEs in particular, and to take effective steps to better communicate the opportunities and benefits offered by the Agreement, including through the setting up of contact points and the establishment of a specialised website for SMEs; considers that a future revision of the trade agreement should consider the inclusion of a dedicated chapter on SMEs;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the fact that EU exports of agricultural products to both countries have increased significantly since the provisional application of the Agreement; Recalls the importance of making trade more inclusive and facilitating an appropriate integration of small-scale farmers into value chains;
Amendment 66 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that both countries have raised specific concerns about their ability to meet certain food safety standards required for the EU market, in particular as regards recent EU legislative proposals on cadmium levels in cacao, endocrine disruptors, novel foods, and palm oil, which risk having a social impact in some of the countries’ poorestmost vulnerable areas, where such production tends to be concentrated; Calls on the EU, Colombia and Peru to strengthen and to make the best use of financial and technical cooperation in order to help meeting the given challenges;
Amendment 72 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Insists on the effectiveneed to implementation of, effectively and through concrete action plans, the specific provisions related to the road map on human, environmental and labour rights, as called for in its resolution of 13 June 2012 on the EU trade agreement with Colombia and Peru, such as enforcing and implementing legislation and policy measures that guarantee; In particular, recalls the commitment by the Parties to implement and to enforce standards on freedom of association, the right to bargain collectively and, strict and effective labour inspections, violence against social and ethnic leaders and the protection of the environment through the appropriate prevention, control and enforcement mechanisms;
Amendment 74 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Welcomes the efforts made by Colombia to fight impunity in cases of criminal offences including through improved investigations; Condemns, however, the persisting violence against human rights defenders, environmental activists, trade unionists, ethnic and community leaders, with an increased rate of offences against women;
Amendment 77 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Likewise, condemns the violence against human rights defenders, social and ethnic community leaders, and particularly violence against women in Peru and calls for increased efforts to solve this persisting scourge;
Amendment 78 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Recalls the obligation of the EU, as enshrined in Art. 8 of the TFUE, to mainstream a gender perspective in all its policies, including Trade; Welcomes the fact that all the EU, Peru and Colombia have signed the Joint Declaration on Trade and Women’s Economic Empowerment issued on the Occasion of the WTO Ministerial Conference in Buenos Aires, in December 2017; Calls on the Parties to visibly reinforce the gender focus of the Agreement and, particularly, stresses the need to carry out evaluations on the basis of gender- disaggregated data; Call on the Parties to include, in a future revision of the Agreement, a specific chapter on gender and trade;
Amendment 89 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Welcomes the latest measures taken in Peru to improve labour inspections and encourages the country to keep on reinforcing efforts, following the ILO recommendations;
Amendment 94 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that the TSD chapter of the Trade Agreement envisages that each Party shall establish Domestic Advisory Groups or committees relevant for matters related to labour, the environment and sustainable development, comprising independent representative civil society organisations, with balanced representation of economic, social and environmental stakeholders; Welcomes the decision of Colombia to create a consultation group independent of the government; calls on Peru to establish a similarly independent domestic advisory group, as an indispensable and essential element for the full implementation of the Agreement;
Amendment 98 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Welcomes the decision by the representatives of the EU and Andean Domestic Advisory Groups to hold annual joint meetings, that will allow for an improved exchange of information and best practices and the preparation of joint recommendations to be presented to the Parties; Considers that this practice should be included in the institutional setting all EU Trade Agreements;
Amendment 99 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls onNotes the Commission to continue to implement fully the 15-point plan to make TSD chapters more effective and recalls the need to continue its dialogue with the different actors involved, including the European Parliament in order to design and ensure an effective enforcement mechanism for the human rights, labour and environmental protection commitments;
Amendment 104 #
2018/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Notes with concern the significant share of the informal economy in both Peru and Colombia, especially among women; emphasises the need to develop effective policies in order to reduce its share and considers that the Agreement could help in that regard, by helping to create more formal jobs, among others, by reinforcing measures to facilitate the economic activities SMEs;
Amendment 95 #
2018/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. NAgrees with the Commission that the preservation of the international competitiveness is a prerequisite for a successful European strategy; notes that strengthening the EU’s internal market as well as consolidating the economic union is vital, since a solid internal market is a prerequisite for the successful implementation of international strategies; points out that being internationally competitive depends strongly on shaping digitalisation successfully and in a socially and environmentally responsible manner; notes that the shift to renewable energies needs to happen as soon as possible;
Amendment 183 #
2018/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Points out that active measures aiming to enhance opportunities for women to benefit from the opportunities provided by an FTA are necessary to reach the goal of gender equality; calls for trade agreements that include a specific chapter on trade and gender equality and women's empowerment, foreseeing to provide for measures aimed at, inter alia, a better work-family life balance and access to social and health services, to pursue an enhanced participation of women enterprises (particularly micro-enterprises and SMEs) in public procurement, to support the internationalisation of women enterprises and the participation of women in Mode 4 opportunities;
Amendment 30 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) consulted elected officials and public opinion in Western Sahara; , after the agreement was negotiated, held consultations in Rabat and Brussels with elected officials and stakeholders in the part of Western Sahara that Morocco controls;
Amendment 41 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the modification of the Liberalisation Agreement, which is of a technical nature, takes place within a broader political and geopolitical context;
Amendment 50 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas the EU and its Member States do not recognise the sovereignty of Morocco over the territory of Western Sahara; whereas the United Nations and the African Union recognise the Front Polisario as representative of the people of Western Sahara, but neither the EU nor its Member States do;
Amendment 55 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the United Nations lists Western Sahara as a Non-Self-Governing Territory for the purposes of Article 73 of the Charter;
Amendment 63 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises the two conditions set in the CJEU judgment, to explicitly mention Western Sahara in the Agreement text and to obtain the consent of the people of Western Sahara, as well as the third criterion added by the Council which is theof a need to ensure that it benefits the local population; notes that the key requirement according the CJEU judgement was consent, not benefits;
Amendment 66 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that the EU and its Member States do not recognise Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara; stresses that the CJEU has confirmed the separate and distinct status of the territory of Western Sahara in relation to any state;
Amendment 69 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that any engagement with Western Sahara must be in line with the territory's status under international law;
Amendment 70 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Recalls the Parliament's position in support of the UN efforts to secure a fair and lasting settlement of the Western Sahara conflict, on the basis of the right to self-determination of the Saharawi people and in accordance with the relevant UN resolutions;
Amendment 77 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Takes note of the tensions between different interests in the territory and believes that a respected and accepted end to the ongoing conflict is required to ensure the broader participation ofreal and long-term benefits for all groups, in the territory’s economic development; is, at the same time, convinced that the local population also has the right to develop while awaiting a political solutioncluding the Saharawi people in the refugee camps in Tindouf, and for a sustainable economic development of the territory;
Amendment 78 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that products coming from the part of Western Sahara that is not under Moroccan control do not seem to benefit from any preferences under the agreement, which raises questions about the obligations of the EU and its Member States to respect the principle of territorial integrity as a part of the right to self- determination; expresses concerns of further reinforcing a division of the territory of Western Sahara in social and economic terms;
Amendment 87 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that the Commission and the EEAS kept the negotiation rounds about the agreement in Rabat and Brussels, this despite the EU and its Member States not recognising Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara and despite the separate and distinct status of Western Sahara;
Amendment 91 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the CJEU did not specify in its judgment how the people’s consent has to be expressed and; considers therefore that someat uncertainty remains as regardsconcerning if the EU has fulfilled thise criterion of consent of the people of Western Sahara;
Amendment 93 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the criticism against the consultation process carried out by the Commission and the EEAS; notes that a large share of the stakeholders that the Commission referred to as being consulted rejected taking part or were not invited; notes that close to one hundred Saharawi civil society groups have protested against the agreement and criticised the consultation process; notes that the UN recognised representative of the people of Western Sahara, the Polisario Front, has objected to the proposed agreement;
Amendment 96 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. RecognisNotes the present economic, social and environmental development observed in Dakhla and Lâayoune and the significant potentialbut stresses that this cannot be seen without the broader context; stresses that achieving a political solution and legal certainty is key for further creation of both low- and high- skilled local employment opportunities for all groups including the Saharawi people living in the refugee camps in Tindouf;
Amendment 102 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that the EU tariff preferences have had a positive impact on the agricultural and fisheries products sectors and their export levels in the non- autonomous territory of Western Sahara under Moroccan control; notes however that those preferences did not have a legal basis;
Amendment 107 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Is convinced that, notwithstanding the outcome of the peace process, the local population will profit from economic development and the spill-over effects created in terms ofUnderlines the need for results in the UN process, and stresses that this is the way to guarantee the legal certainty needed in order for the territory to profit from economic development and investment in infrastructure, health and education;
Amendment 112 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Acknowledges the existing investment in the renewables sector and the circular economy, such as in the seawater desalination plant, and encourages further work in this direcbut stresses that investments currently take place in the context of an occupation;
Amendment 118 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Endorses business initiatives by young Sahrawis, many of whom are women, and highlights their need for extended export opportunities and legal certainty in order to allow for further investment in sectors with high employment demand;
Amendment 122 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Warns of the adverse effects of a permanent withdrawal of tariff preferthat an absences on products from the non- autonomous territory of Western Sahara,f a political solution has and the message this sends to the younger generation and its potential to develop the territory; underlines the risk of activities being relocated to regions in Morocco where they would benefit from the preferences;
Amendment 130 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is convinced that an EU presence through trade and investment is preferable to withdrawal when it comes to engagement in and monitoring of human rights and individual freedoms, and demands a rigorous assessments and dialogue with Morocco part on these issues;
Amendment 155 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Emphasises that a key criterion for Parliament is to ensure that there will be a mechanism in place to technically trace products from Western Sahara so that Member States customs authorities have a clear indication of their origin; calls on the EU and Morocco to swiftly present a viable solution to this present such a mechanism prior to the vote on the agreemendt; expects the corrective measures laid down in the agreement to be used in that regard;
Amendment 167 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Stresses that this agreement does not imply any recognition of Morocco’s sovereignty over Western Sahara and underlines the EU's support for the UN efforts to secure a fair, lasting and mutually acceptable settlement of the Western Sahara conflict, on the basis of the right to self-determination of the people of Western Sahara and in accordance with the relevant UN resolutions;
Amendment 170 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21b. Suggests that the European Parliament could ask the CJEU for an opinion about the agreement and its conformity with law;
Amendment 172 #
2018/0256M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 c (new)
Paragraph 21 c (new)
21c. Believes that the European Parliament should reject the agreement as long as it does not have the free and informed consent from the people of Western Sahara;
Amendment 4 #
2018/0256(NLE)
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. GivDeclines its consent to the agreement as long as it applies to the territory of Western Sahara without the consent of the people of Western Sahara;
Amendment 78 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The CAP must take into account the principle of equality between women and men within the territory of the European Union, with a particular focus on promoting the participation of women in the socio-economic development of rural areas. This Regulation should help to ensure that the work that women do is more visible, better appreciated and taken into account within the specific objectives to be proposed by the Member States in their strategic plans.
Amendment 79 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 b (new)
Recital 10 b (new)
(10b) It is essential for the future of Europe and the planet that the EU urgently phases out agricultural support for farmers who do not pursue environmentally and climatically sustainable operations.
Amendment 88 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In order to give substance to the objectives of the CAP as established by Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as well as to ensure that the Union adequately addresses its most recent challenges and international undertakings, it is appropriate to provide for a set of general objectives reflecting the orientations given in the Communication on ‘The Future of Food and Farming’. A set of specific objectives should be further defined at Union level and applied by the Member States in their CAP Strategic Plans. WhileIn order to strikinge a balance across the dimensions of sustainable development, in line with the impact assessment, these specific objectives should translate the general objectives ofMember States should strive to achieve all of these specific objectives for the CAP intofor more concrete priorities and take into account relevant Union legislation, particularly with regard to climate, energy and environment.
Amendment 90 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The CAP has been unable to reduce the agricultural sector's dependence on pesticides. Therefore, specific policy instruments are needed to change farmers' use of pesticides, such as national tax measures, cross-compliance between integrated plant health, as defined in Directive 2009/128 / EC, and the CAP or direct subsidies. Scientific studies have established that today's intensive use of pesticides contributes to the gradual decline of biodiversity in Europe and this is extremely worrying, particularly the loss of winged insects. Therefore, the transition to a more sustainable use of pesticides, including low-risk methods and products, should be promoted in European agriculture.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 - point 1
Recital 16 - point 1
As many rural areas in the Union suffer from structural problems such as lack of attractive employment opportunities, skill shortages, underinvestment in connectivity, infrastructures and essential services, as well as youth drain, it is fundamental to strengthen the socio-economic fabric in those areas, in line with the Cork 2.0. Declaration, particularly through job creation and generational renewal, by bringing the Commission's jobs and growth to rural areas, promoting social inclusion, generational renewal, increased integration of women into the rural economy and the development of ‘Smart Villages’ across the European countryside. As indicated in the Communication on ‘The Future of Food and Farming’, new rural value chains such as renewable energy, the emerging bio- economy, the circular economy, and ecotourism can offer good growth and job potential for rural areas. In this context, financial instruments and the use of the InvestEU guarantee can play a crucial role for ensuring access to financing and for bolstering the growth capacity of farms and enterprises. There is a potential for employment opportunities in rural areas for legally staying third country nationals, promoting their social and economic integration especially in the framework of Community-led Local Development strategies.
Amendment 136 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Member States should set farm advisory services for the purpose of improving the sustainable management and overall performance of agricultural holdings and rural businesses, covering economic, environmental and social dimensions, and to identify the necessary improvements as regards all measures at farm level provided for in the CAP Strategic Plans. These farm advisory services should help farmers and other beneficiaries of CAP support to become more aware of the relationship between farm management and land management on the one hand, and certain standards, requirements and information, including environmental and climate and animal welfare ones, on the other hand. The list of the latter includes standards applying to or necessary for farmers and other CAP beneficiaries and set in the CAP Strategic Plan, as well as those stemming from the legislation on water, on the sustainable use of pesticides, as well as the initiatives to combat antimicrobial resistance and the management of risks. In order to enhance the quality and effectiveness of the advice, Member States should integrate advisors within the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), in order to be able to deliver up-to-date technological and scientific information developed by research and innovation.
Amendment 155 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) Female participation in rural areas in social, economic and environmental terms, is an important sustainable development pillar in rural areas and should be promoted, encouraged and supported by Member States in their strategic plans. In order to reduce the gender employment gap and to increase female employment, it is necessary for Member States’ Strategic Plans to promote the development of policies aimed at achieving a work-life balance.
Amendment 169 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Member States should be allowed to use part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments for coupled income support in order to improve competitiveness, sustainability, and/or quality in certain sectors and productions that are particularly important for social, economic or, environmental or reasons that affect animal welfare and undergo certain difficulties. Furthermore, Member States should also be allowed to use an additional part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments to grant coupled income support specifically for the support of protein crop production in order to reduce the Union's deficit in this regard.
Amendment 196 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43 a (new)
Recital 43 a (new)
(43a) In order to promote the principle of equality between women and men, Member States may, in their CAP Strategic Plans, set out specific conditions for financial instruments related to improving the situation of rural women and their business opportunities. They should therefore prioritise women in their CAP Strategic Plans, in order, inter alia, to ensure better access to farmland and credit, thus contributing to a greater representation of rural women among farm holders and entrepreneurs.
Amendment 208 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) EAFRDThe EJFLU should not provide support to investments that would harm the environment, harm human or animal health or which cannot comply with existing animal welfare regulations. Hence it is necessary to provide in this Regulation a number of exclusion rules, as well as the possibility to further develop these guarantees in delegated acts. Notably, the EAFRD should not finance investments in irrigation which do not contribute towards the achievement, or the preservation, of good status of the associated water body or bodies and investments in afforestation which are not consistent with climate and environmental objectives in line with sustainable forest management principles.
Amendment 333 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to strengthen the socio-economic fabric ofor both women and men in rural areas.
Amendment 339 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The achievement of the general objectives shall be pursued through simultaneously achieving the fulfilment of the following specific objectives:
Amendment 373 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) foster sustainable development and efficient management of natural resources such as water, soil and air; and greatly reduce dependence on chemical pesticides, while promoting alternative methods and low-risk products.
Amendment 390 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) contribute to the protection of biodiversity, enhancereversing the decline of biodiversity, including diversity in agriculture, strengthening ecosystem services and preserveing habitats and landscapes;.
Amendment 410 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) promote employment, growth, social inclusion, greater participation of women in economic activities, and local development in rural areas, including bio- economy and sustainable forestry;
Amendment 431 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) improve animal welfare in line with Article 13 TFEU, the best available scientific research on animal welfare and in accordance with society's requirements.
Amendment 660 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(ba) In the cases referred to in subparagraphs (a) and (b), Member States may grant priority to women in order to achieve the objective referred to in point (h) of Article 6(1).
Amendment 709 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall provide support for voluntary schemes for the climate and, the environment and animal welfare ('eco- schemes') under the conditions set out in this Article and as further specified in their CAP Strategic Plans.
Amendment 719 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall support under this type of intervention genuine farmers who make commitments to observe, on eligible hectares, agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and, the environment and the welfare of farm animals.
Amendment 740 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall establish the list of agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and, the environment. and the welfare of farm animals
Amendment 756 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 4
Article 28 – paragraph 4
4. Those practices shall be designed to meet one or more of the specific environmental- and climate-, climate and farm animal- related objectives laid down in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1).
Amendment 831 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 31 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where the linked income support concerns livestock production, only production methods that go beyond the minimum national requirements and the Union's animal welfare and animal health requirements shall be considered eligible
Amendment 855 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) integrated production., promote, develop and implement production methods that respect the environment, environmentally friendly cultivation methods and production techniques, sustainable use of natural resources, in particular the protection of water, soil and other natural resources, while reducing pesticide dependency;
Amendment 874 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall choose in their CAP Strategic Plans for each specific objective set out in Article 6(1) one or more ofutilize the following types of interventions in the apiculture sector:
Amendment 890 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) measures to improve pollination of honeybees and other wild pollinators.
Amendment 922 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 51 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) improve competitiveness of Union wine producers including contributing to improvement of sustainable production systemreduction of environmental impact of the Union wine sector; by applying production methods that respect the environment, environmentally friendly cultivation methods and reproduction of environmental impact of the Union wine sectortechniques, sustainable use of natural resources, in particular for the protection of water, soil and other natural resources, while reducing pesticide dependence; those objectives relate to the specific objectives set out in points (b) to (f) and (h) to (i) of Article 6 (1);
Amendment 975 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Member States shall pursue one or more of the following objectives in the other sectors referred to in point (f) of Article 39:
Amendment 991 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 60 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. As regards the objectives referred to in points (a) to (g) of Article 59 Member States shall choose in their CAP Strategic Plans one or more ofutilize the following types of intervention:
Amendment 1080 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 65 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) go beyond the minimum requirements for the use of fertiliser and plant protection products, animal welfare, as well as other mandatory requirements established by national and Union law;
Amendment 1081 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new)
Article 65 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new)
(ba) goes beyond the minimum animal welfare requirements and other mandatory requirements laid down in EU law,
Amendment 1172 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point h a (new)
Article 68 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) investments in infrastructure that do not comply with recommendations for good animal welfare, and principles contained in Council Directive 98/58/EC on the protection of animals in agriculture.
Amendment 1269 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
At least 350% of the total EAFRD contribution to the CAP Strategic Plan as set out in Annex IX shall be reserved for interventions addressing the specific environmental-, climate and clanimatl welfare-related objectives set out in points (d), (e), (f) and (fia) of Article 6(1) of this Regulation, excluding interventions based on Article 66.
Amendment 1314 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 7
Article 86 – paragraph 7
7. Member States may decide in their CAP Strategic Plan to use a certain share of the EAFRD allocation to leverage support and upscale integrated Strategic Nature Projects as defined under the [LIFE Regulation] and to finance actions in respect of transnational learning mobility of people in the field agricultural and rural development with a focus on young farmers, in accordance with the [Erasmus Regulation], and women in rural areas.
Amendment 1356 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – title
Article 92 – title
Increased ambitions with regard to environmental-, climate and clanimatl welfare-related objectives
Amendment 1361 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 92 – paragraph 1
Article 92 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall aim to make, through their CAP Strategic Plans and in particular through the elements of the intervention strategy referred to in point (a) of Article 97(2), a greater overall contribution to the achievement of the specific environmental-, climate and clanimatl welfare- related objectives set out in points (d), (e), (f) and (fia) of Article 6(1) in comparison to the overall contribution made to the achievement of the objective laid down in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 110(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 through support under the EAGF and the EAFRD in the period 2014 to 2020.
Amendment 1378 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 94 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Member States shall publish their CAP strategy plans and related annexes, both as drafts and after approval, in order to ensure the possibility of an informed public debate.
Amendment 1559 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – EU Specific objectives – point 5
Annex I – EU Specific objectives – point 5
Promote employment, growth, social inclusion, greater participation of women in the rural economy, and local development in rural areas, including bio- economy and sustainable forestry;
Amendment 1581 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – EU Specific objectives – point 6
Annex I – EU Specific objectives – point 6
contribute to the protection of biodiversity, enhancereversing the decline in biodiversity, including diversity of fauna and flora in agriculture, strengthening ecosystem services and preserveing habitats and landscapes;
Amendment 1586 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.20 a (new)
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.20 a (new)
1.20a Pollinators index
Amendment 1615 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.21 a (new)
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.21 a (new)
1.21a Attracting women farmers
Amendment 1619 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Result indicators – R.30 a (new)
Annex I – Result indicators – R.30 a (new)
R.30a Increasing the proportion of women who receive support under the CAP.
Amendment 1621 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Result indicators – R.30 b (new)
Annex I – Result indicators – R.30 b (new)
R.30b Young women in rural areas, increasing the proportion of young women* who receive support for the establishment of agricultural holdings or businesses under the CAP. _____________________ * The age limit must be the same as that indicated in the definition of a young farmer.
Amendment 1626 #
2018/0216(COD)
R.31a Increasing female employment in rural areas. The proportion of jobs for women in projects receiving CAP funding.
Amendment 1636 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.26 a (new)
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.26 a (new)
1.26a Sustainable use of veterinary products in livestock farming: sales/use of food producing animals
Amendment 1638 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.27
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.27
I.27 Sustainable pesticide use: Reduce risks and impactsd dependence on use of pesticides**
Amendment 1645 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.27 b (new)
Annex I – Impact indicators – I.27 b (new)
1.27b Sustainable use of biocides: reduce dependence on biocides
Amendment 1648 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I –Impact indicators – I.28 a (new)
Annex I –Impact indicators – I.28 a (new)
1.28a. Reduction of non-compliance with available animal welfare legislation (Council Regulation No 1099/2009, Council Directive 2007/43 / EC, Council Directive 1999/74 / ED) per animal in the Member State
Amendment 1649 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I –Impact indicators – I.28 b (new)
Annex I –Impact indicators – I.28 b (new)
1.28b. Measurement of animal density by species in the Member State
Amendment 1652 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Result indicators – R.36 a (new)
Annex I – Result indicators – R.36 a (new)
R.36a Sustainable use of veterinary products: proportion of livestock affected by support measures to limit the use of veterinary products (prevention/reduction) to reduce the risks and adverse effects of these products
Amendment 1655 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Result indicators – R.37
Annex I – Result indicators – R.37
R.37 Sustainable pesticide use: Share of agricultural land concerned by supported specific actions which lead to a sustainable use of pesticides in order to reduce risks and impactsreduced dependence on the use of pesticides
Amendment 1663 #
2018/0216(COD)
R.37a Sustainable use of biocides: proportion of agricultural land: proportion of agricultural land affected by specific supportive measures leading to reduction of biocide dependence
Amendment 1667 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – EU Specific objectives – point 9 a (new)
Annex I – EU Specific objectives – point 9 a (new)
Improve animal welfare in line with Article 13 of the Treaty, best available research and knowledge and community requirements.
Amendment 1790 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – SMR 16 a (new) – Requirements and standards
Annex III – SMR 16 a (new) – Requirements and standards
Council Regulation 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing
Amendment 1791 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – SMR 16 b (new) – Requirements and standards
Annex III – SMR 16 b (new) – Requirements and standards
Council Directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production
Amendment 1792 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – SMR 16 c (new) – Requirements and standards
Annex III – SMR 16 c (new) – Requirements and standards
Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens
Amendment 269 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Component 5 may include regions in: a) Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, as well as Liechtenstein, Andorra, Monaco and San Marino b) Greenland c) the Faeroe Islands d) regions of partner countries under IPA III or NDICI. e) The regions, third countries or partner countries listed in paragraph 2 shall be regions at NUTS 2 level or equivalent.
Amendment 277 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The ERDF resources for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) shall amount to EUR 8 430 000 000for components 1-5 in Article 3 shall amount to 3.3 % (i.e. a total of EUR x xxx xxx xxx) where component 5 amounts to 0.3 % of the global resources available for budgetary commitment from the ERDF, ESF+ and the Cohesion Fund for the 2021-2027 programming period and set out in Article [1023(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR].
Amendment 462 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The Member State hosting the managing authority may submit a motivated request for an amendment of an Interreg programme together with the amended programme, after consulting local and regional authorities in accordance with Article 6 on partnership and multi-level governance in the common provisions, setting out the expected impact of that amendment on the achievement of the objectives.
Amendment 515 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
(c a) Paragraph 4 shall not apply to the specific additional allocation received by the NUTS level 2 regions fulfilling the criteria laid down in Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the 1994 Act of Accession.
Amendment 8 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
Having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Copenhagen European Council of 21 and 22 June 1993 ("Copenhagen criteria")
Amendment 9 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Citation 5 b (new)
Citation 5 b (new)
Having regard to the rule of law checklist established by the European Commission for democracy through law ("Venice Commission"), CDL-AD(2016)007,
Amendment 13 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Member States should be assessed on a regular basis in order to verify that their laws and practices comply with the common values on which the Union is founded, thereby providing a sound legal and administrative framework for the implementation of Union policies. The obligations incumbent on a candidate country under the Copenhagen criteria, which include the stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights, and respect for and protection of minorities, as well as the ability to take on the obligations of Union membership, continue to apply to the Member States after joining the Union. These obligations are set out in Article 2 TEU, and the principle of sincere cooperation is established by Article 4 TEU.
Amendment 14 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The rule of law is a prerequisite for the protection of the other fundamental values on which the Union is founded, such as freedom, democracy, equality and respect for human rights. Respect for the rule of law is intrinsically linked to respect for democracy and for fundamental rights: there can be no democracy and respect for fundamental rights without respect for the rule of law and vice versa. The coherence and consistency of internal and external democracy, rule of law and respect for fundamental human rights is key to the credibility of the Union.
Amendment 16 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Generalised deficiencies in the Member States as regards the rule of law which affect in particular the proper functioning of public authorities and effective judicial review, can seriously harm the financial interests of the Union. Efficient investigations into such deficiencies, and the application of effective and proportionate measures when a generalised deficiency is established, are needed not only to secure the financial interests of the Union, including the effective collection of revenue, but also to ensure public trust in the Union and its institutions. Only an independent judiciary that upholds the rule of law and legal certainty in all Member States can ultimately guarantee that money from the EU budget is sufficiently protected.
Amendment 25 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) It is essential that the legitimate interests of final recipients and beneficiaries are properly safeguarded when measures are adopted in the event of generalised deficiencies. When considering the measures to be adopted, the Commission should take into account their potential impact on final recipients and beneficiaries. To strengthen the protection of the final recipients or beneficiaries, the Commission should actively monitor the respect of the legal obligation of government entities and Member States to continue making payments after adopting measures on basis of this regulation, and inform the final recipients or beneficiaries of their rights in case any infringements occur.
Amendment 26 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 b (new)
Recital 14 b (new)
(14b) It is essential that individual recipients of scholarships through programmes such as Erasmus, research grants and similar individual grants should not be affected if measures are adopted concerning a Member State in the event of generalised deficiencies.
Amendment 32 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Before proposing the adoption of any measure pursuant to this Regulation, the Commission should inform the Member State concerned why it considers that a generalised deficiency regarding the rule of law might exist in that Member State. The Commission should immediately inform the European Parliament and the Council about the notification and its contents. The Member State concerned should be allowed to submit its observations. The Commission and the Council should take those observations into account.
Amendment 36 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) The Councilmmission should lift measures with suspensive effect on a proposal from the Commiss, and submit a proposal to the Parliament and the Council to lift in full or in part the budgetary reserve of the measures in question, if the situation leading to the imposition of those measures has been sufficiently remedied.
Amendment 39 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'the rule of law' refers to the Union value enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union which includes amongst others the principles of legality, implying a transparent, accountable, democratic and pluralistic process for enacting laws; legal certainty; prohibition of arbitrariness of the executive powers; effective judicial protection by independent courts, including of fundamental rights; separation of powers and equality before the latolerance, solidarity and respect for human dignity, freedom, equality and human rights including the rights of persons belonging to minorities; prohibition of arbitrariness of the executive powers; effective judicial protection by independent courts, including of fundamental rights, equal treatment, absence of discrimination, freedom of opinion and expression, and fundamental labour rights; separation of powers and equality before the law, especially by effective limits on government powers by the legislature, by the judiciary and by independent audit and review;
Amendment 42 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 'generalised deficiency as regards the rule of law' means a widespread or recurrent practice or omission, or measure by public authorities which affects the rule of law as described in Article 3;
Amendment 51 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the proper functioning of investigation and public prosecution services in relation to the prosecution of fraud, corruption or other breaches of Union law and an effective criminal investigation system relating to the implementation of the Union budget;
Amendment 56 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) the freedom of opinion and expression required in order to permit the uncovering of cases of fraud, corruption or other breaches of EU law, including the freedom of the press, freedom of association and academic freedom.
Amendment 59 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) disproportionately restricting the freedom of the press, freedom of association and academic freedom;
Amendment 60 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) failing that to ensure that the government is accountable under the law, as are private actors;
Amendment 61 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c c (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c c (new)
(cc) failing to ensure that laws are publicised and just, and protect fundamental rights, including the security of persons and property and certain core human rights;
Amendment 62 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c d (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c d (new)
(cd) failing to ensure that the processes by which the laws are enacted, administered, and enforced are accessible, fair, and efficient;
Amendment 63 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c e (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c e (new)
(ce) failing to ensure that justice is delivered timely by competent, ethical, and independent representatives and neutral parties who are accessible, have adequate resources, and reflect the make-up of the communities they serve;
Amendment 64 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c f (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c f (new)
Amendment 88 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Unless the decision adopting the measures provides otherwise, tThe imposition of appropriate measures shall not affect the obligation of government entities referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 or of Member States referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 to implement the programme or fund affected by the measure, and in particular the obligation to make payments to final recipients or beneficiaries.
Amendment 93 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Where the Commission finds that it has reasonable grounds to believe that the conditions of Article 3 are fulfilled, it shall send a written notification to that Member State, setting out the grounds on which it based its finding. The Commission shall immediately inform the Parliament and the Council of the notification and its contents.
Amendment 97 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. TWhen assessing whether the conditions of Article 3 are fulfilled, the Commission may take into account all relevant information, including decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union, resolutions of the European Parliament, reports of the Court of Auditors, and conclusions and recommendations of relevant international organisations. , non-governmental organisations and networks, such as the bodies of the Council of Europe and the European networks of supreme courts and councils for the judiciary. The Commission shall also take into account the criteria used in the context of EU accession negotiations, in particular the chapters on judiciary and fundamental rights (23), justice, freedom and security (24), financial control (32) and taxation (16), as well as the guidelines used in the context of the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism to track the progress of a Member State.
Amendment 107 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Before adopting a decision on the appropriate measures, the Commission shall carry out an assessment of the potential impact of those measures on final recipients or beneficiaries of the payments related to the affected programmes or funds. The Commission shall take into due account the information and guidance referred to in paragraph 2 when assessing the proportionality of the measures.
Amendment 110 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. Where the Commission considers that the generalised deficiency as regards the rule of law is established, it shall submit a proposaladopt a decision for an implementing act on the appropriate measures to the Councilby means of an implementing act.
Amendment 112 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. At the same time as it adopts its decision, the Commission shall simultaneously submit to the European Parliament and the Council a proposal to transfer to a budgetary reserve an amount equivalent to the value of the measures adopted.
Amendment 113 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. By way of derogation from paragraphs 4 and 6 of Article 31 of the Financial Regulation, the European Parliament and the Council shall deliberate upon the transfer proposal within four weeks of its receipt by both institutions. The transfer proposal shall be considered to be approved unless, within the four-week period, the European Parliament, acting by majority of the votes cast, or the Council, acting by qualified majority, amend or reject it. If the European Parliament or the Council amend the transfer proposal, paragraph 8 of Article 31 of the Financial Regulation shall apply.
Amendment 114 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 c (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. The decision shall enter into force if neither the European Parliament nor the Council reject the transfer proposal within the period referred to in paragraph 6b.
Amendment 120 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8
Article 5 – paragraph 8
Amendment 122 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Throughout the period of application of the measures, the Commission shall actively monitor whether the legal entitlements of final recipients or beneficiaries are being respected. The Commission shall also facilitate the submission to it of complaints from final recipients or beneficiaries where they consider their legal entitlements are not being respected. Where the Commission finds that the Member State or the government entity concerned fails to fulfil its legal obligation to make payments, and the legitimate interests of final recipients or beneficiaries are not being respected, it shall take any appropriate measures to assist those final recipients or beneficiaries in enforcing their claims.
Amendment 124 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall assess the situation in the Member State concerned within an indicative time limit of one month, and in any case within a reasonable timeframe from the date of reception of the formal notification. Once the generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law which on the grounds of which the appropriate measures were adopted cease to exist in full or in part, the Commission shall submit to the Council a proposal for a decision lifting those measures in full or in part. , without delay, adopt a decision lifting those measures in full or in part. At the same time as it adopts its decision, the Commission shall simultaneously submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a proposal to lift in full or in part the budgetary reserve referred to in Article 5(6a).The procedure set out in paragraphs 2, 4, 5, 6, 6b and 76c of Article 5 shall apply.
Amendment 127 #
2018/0136(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall immediately inform the European Parliament of anyEuropean Parliament may invite the Commission for a structured dialogue on the measures proposed or adopted pursuant, having regard to Articles 4, 5 and 56, including on the issue of the protection of final beneficiaries.
Amendment 31 #
2018/0095M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the agreement will ensure a high level of investment protection while safeguarding the Parties’ right to regulate and pursue legitimate public policy objectives, such as public health and environmental protection; stresses that it must not in any way restrict the autonomy of social partners and trade union rights;
Amendment 62 #
2018/0095M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes Singapore’s commitment to the multilateral investment court, a public international court which should be empowered to hear disputes on investments between investors and states that will have accepted its jurisdiction over their bilateral investment treaties, and whose ultimate goal is to overcome the current, unbalanced, costly and fragmented investment protection regime; considers the agreement a crucial stepping stone towards that end;
Amendment 70 #
2018/0095M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights that the agreement will replace the existing bilateral investment treaties between 13 EU Member States and Singapore, which are based on outdated investment protection provisions and include the controversial ISDS; underlines that functional national courts is a first option to solve investor disputes but considers that thise agreement constitutes an important step in reforming global rules on investment dispute settlement and, it is hoped, will progressively lead to the removal of ISDS from bilateral investment treaties;
Amendment 79 #
2018/0095M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Regrets the lack of provisions on investors’ obligations, including binding corporate social responsibility standards; calls on the Commission to propose legislation laying down mandatory due diligence standards in sectors other than conflict minerals and timber, such as the garment industry; stresses the responsibilities of investors according to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 68 #
2018/0093M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the improved access under this agreement to Singapore’s public procurement market as compared to under the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA); underlines that the agreement must not restrict the political room for manoeuvre in procurements when it comes to setting requirements on what is to be procured and demands on e.g. labour and employment conditions;
Amendment 84 #
2018/0093M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that the agreement safeguards the EU’s right to apply its own standards to all goods and services sold in the EU and upholds the EU’s precautionary principle; underlines that such high standards, including in national laws, regulations and collective agreements, should never be seen as trade barriers;
Amendment 104 #
2018/0093M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that the involvement of civil society and social partners in monitoring the implementation of the agreement is crucial and calls for a swift establishment of domestic advisory groups following the entry into force of the agreement and for a balanced representation of civil society therein;
Amendment 16 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) has a strategic dimension and is the most important bilateral trade agreement ever concluded by the Union as it covers nearly a third of world GDP, almost 40 percent of world trade and more than 600 million people;
Amendment 83 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that Japan will, notably, grant non-discriminatory access for EU suppliers to the procurement markets of 48 cities54 core cities, and may enlarge the number of cities covered even further, remove the ‘operational safety clause’, which has in practise prevented EU rail suppliers to access the Japanese market, and maximise transparency in tendering for public contracts;
Amendment 103 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that both parties are committed to ensure high levels of environmental and labour protection and that those high standards should not be regarded as trade barriers; recalls Goal 5 of the Sustainable Development Goals in the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, welcomes the fact that both Japan and the EU have adhered themselves to the “Buenos Aires Declaration on Women and Trade” and calls on both parties to strongly reinforce commitments on gender and trade in this agreement; expects the EU and Japan to show their commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals in all their actions, including the implementation of this agreement;
Amendment 114 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the commitment to the effective implementation of the Paris Agreement to combat climate change and of other multilateral environmental agreements, as well as to the sustainable management of forests (including fighting illegal logging) and fisheries (combating illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing); recalls that EU legislation remains applicable to products imported into the European market; calls on both parties to cooperate closely under the sustainable development chapter to exchange best practices and to strengthen the enforcement of legislation in these matters;
Amendment 131 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the fact that the agreement includes the clear commitment to pursue the ratification of fundamental ILO conventions; regrets that Japan has not yet ratified two ILO core conventions (on discrimination and on the abolition of forced labour) and expects, in light of commitments made in the EPA, concrete progressand swift progress in a reasonable timeframe on the part of Japan towards the ratification of these conventions;
Amendment 134 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Welcomes that Japan will establish an inter-ministerial framework to deal with the implementation of sustainable development commitments, including the ratification of the ILO core conventions, and that the trade and sustainable development committee foreseen by the agreement is tasked with interacting with civil society on the implementation of the sustainable development chapter;
Amendment 205 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Takes note that negotiations continue on a separate investment agreement, which the European Parliament will monitor closely, and reiterates that it is unacceptable to return to the old, private ISDS mechanism;
Amendment 216 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that the agreement includes a rendezvous clause to assess the issue of cross-border transfer of data provisions within three years and recognises the growing importance of the digital economy for growth and jobs; calls on the Commission to fully respect the EU law on data protection and on the protection of privacy and stresses that any future outcome must be subject to the consent of Parliament and safeguard EU citizens’ fundamental rights;
Amendment 218 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation and coordination with Japan on multilateral issues, in close cooperation with other strategic partners, to defend and to develop further the global trading system based on the respect of WTO law and other international norms;
Amendment 221 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for the prompt establishment of the SME contact points and website to make sure that relevant information on market access is made available to small companies;
Amendment 227 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Urges both partners to ensure the active involvement of social partners and civil society in the monitoring and implementation of the EPA, notably through the joint dialogue with civil society and the domestic advisory group; calls on the Commission to actively establish and share best practices with Japan on the functioning of domestic advisory groups and the joint dialogue; calls on both parties to ensure a speedy set-up of well-functioning, effective and balanced domestic advisory groups with a proper code of conduct and to ensure that their views are taken into account in a transparent manner in the government to government consultations foreseen in the agreement;
Amendment 233 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Expects full transparency on the functioning of the sectorial committees to be established under the agreement both with regard to the Parliament and the general public;
Amendment 2 #
2018/0058(COD)
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Approves its statement annexed to this resolution; For information, the text of the statement is the following: "The European Parliament recalls that the Memorandum of Understanding referred to in Article 3(1) must focus on fighting corruption and on social and economic stabilization.In this regard the European Parliament underlines that Ukraine must establish an independent anti-corruption court in line with the recommendations from the Venice Commission.Furthermore, the European Parliament requests the Ukrainian Parliament to ensure that anti-corruption measures do not hinder the work of independent civil society, notably within the system of e-declarations.In addition, the structural reforms to be laid down in the Memorandum of Understanding should not lead to further impoverishment and increasing poverty for the population. The Commission is expected to present the Memorandum of Understanding to the European Parliament as soon as possible and, in any case, prior to the disbursal of the first tranche of the macro-financial assistance.”
Amendment 7 #
2018/0058(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) A pre-condition for granting the Union’s macro-financial assistance (MFA) should be that Ukraine fulfills the conditions attached to past and future MFA programmes, notably the fight against corruption and the establishment of an independent anti-corruption court in line with the recommendations from the Venice Commission, respects effective democratic mechanisms – including a multi-party parliamentary system – and the rule of law, and guarantees respect for human rights. In addition, the specific objectives of the Union’s macro-financial assistance should strengthen the efficiency, transparency and accountability of the public finance management systems in Ukraine and should promote structural reforms aimed at supporting sustainable and inclusive growth, poverty reduction of the large part of the population, employment creation, reduction of shadow economy and of illegal employment creation and fiscal consolidation. Both the fulfillment of the preconditions and the achievement of those objectives should be regularly monitored by the Commission and the European External Action Service throughout the period of the MFA programme. The Commission is expected to present the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to the European Parliament as soon as possible and, in any case, prior to the disbursal of the first tranche of the macro-financial assistance.
Amendment 4 #
2017/2283(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Recalls that Regulation (EU) 2017/1566 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the introduction of temporary autonomous trade measures for Ukraine supplementing the trade concessions available under the Association Agreement includes a legal requirement that the Commission's annual report on the implementation of the DCFTA includes a detailed assessment of the autonomous trade measures including the social impact.