BETA

17 Amendments of Jan MULDER related to 2008/0216(CNS)

Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point 7 a (new)
(7a) ‘recreational fisheries’ means all fishing activities where the catch shall be neither sold nor marketed except for philanthropic purposes;
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1
1. Recreational fisheries on a vessel in Community waters on a stock subject to a multiannual plan shall be subject to an authorisation for that vessel issued by the flag Member State.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2
2. Catches in recreational fisheries on stocks subject to a multiannual plan shall be registered by the flag Member State.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3
3. Catches of species subject to a multiannual plan by recreational fisheries shall be counted against the relevant quotas of the flag Member State. The Member States concerned shall establish a share from such quotas to be used exclusively for the purpose of recreational fisheries.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 4
4. The marketing of catches from a recreational fishery shall be prohibited except for philanthropic purposes.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 2
2. The proceedings initiated pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be capabin principle, in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, of effectively deprivinge those responsible of the economic benefit of the infringements and of producing results proportionate to the seriousness of such infringements, thereby effectively discouraging further offences of the same kind.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that a natural person having committed or a legal person held liable for a serious infringement is in principle punishabled by effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative sanctions, in accordance with the range of sanctions and measures provided for in Chapter IX of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 2
2. In addition, for all serious infringements which level cannot be linked to the value of the fishery products obtained by committing the serious infringement, Member States shall ensure that a natural person having committed or a legal person held liable for a serious infringement is punishable by an administrative fine of a minimum of at least 5.000 EUR and a maximum of at least 300.000 EUR for each serious infringement. The flag Member State shall be immediately notified of the sanction imposed.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 3
3. In case of a repeated serious infringement within a 5 year period, a Member State shall impose an administrative fine of a minimum of at least 10.000 EUR and a maximum of at least 600.000 EUR.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 4
4. In fixing the amount of the fines the Member States shall also take into account the value of the prejudice to the fishing resources and the marine environment concerned.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall apply a penalty point system on the basis of which the holder of a fishing authorisation receives appropriate penalty points as a result of an infringement against the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 2
2. When a natural person has committed or a legal person is held liable for an infringement of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy, the appropriate number of points shall be assigned to the holder of the fishing authorisation as a result of the infringement. The holder of the fishing authorisation shall be entitled to review proceedings in accordance with national law.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 3
3. When the total number of penalty points equals or exceeds a specified number of points, the fishing authorisation shall be automatically suspended for a period of at least six months. That period shall be one year if the fishing authorisation is suspended a second time as a consequence of a permit holder being assigned the specified number of points. In case of the holder being assigned the specified number of points for a third time, the fishing authorisation shall be permanently withdrawn.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 4
4. In the event of a serious infringement, the penalty points assigned shall be at least, equal to half of the points referred to in paragraph 3.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 5
5. If the holder of a suspended fishing authorisation does not commit, within three years from the date of the last infringement, another infringement, all points on the fishing authorisation shall be deleted.
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 6
6. Provisions for the application of this Article may be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 111.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall also establish a penalty point system under which the master and the officers of a vessel receive appropriate penalty points as a result of an infringement against the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy committed by them.deleted
2009/03/10
Committee: PECH