5 Amendments of Sven SIMON related to 2020/2272(ACI)
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that, in line with the political statement, the institutions commit to a coordinated approach on reinforcing the common transparency culture with the view to improving and further strengthening ethical interest representation; highlights their obligation under the Agreement, and in accordance with Article 13(2) TEU, to practise mutual sincere cooperation when developing the scheme and that the institutions should therefore aim for the highest level of commitment; insistreminds that the measures referred to in the Aagreement represent athe minimum for which should be expanded further; there is political support given the existing constitutional and legal limitations;
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the commitments made by Parliament in the negotiation process on conditionality and complementary transparency measures; considers that the modification of Rules 11 and 35 of its Rules of Procedure have provided a strong impetuscommitment in that regard; welcomes the fact that the Agreement preserves the constitutional right of the Members to exercise their mandate freely;
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is of the opinion that the implementation of the conditionality measures and other complementary transparency measures through individual decisions is not only a way to respect the respective internal organisational powers of the three signatory institutions but that it offers also an opportunity to increase the level of commitment of the respective institutions with regard to the scheme throughout the implementation period; welcomes in that regard the fact that the annual report has been expanded to cover the implementation of such measures adopted by the signatory institutions;
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Insists on the need to ensure that, within Parliament, there is a high degree of political ownership of the implementation and review process; proposes therefore that a monitoring group is established within the Committee on Constitutional Affairs; suggests that the review process provided for in Article 14 of the Agreement should be informed and shaped in close cooperation with EP Vice- President responsible for Transparency;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to consider, Underlines the importance of political ownership guaranteeing the pbrocess of revision of the EP Rules of Procedure, further transparency measures which should be introduced in order to enhance Parliaad consensus necessary to go beyond the current proposals, especially in view of the formal requirement’s commitment to the joint schemthat apply to any revision of the Rules of Procedure;