11 Amendments of Nicola BEER related to 2021/2184(INI)
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the role of the banking sector is crucial to the recovery, especially to SME's, and transition to a low-carbon economy;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the BU should be built in a friendlytransparent and attractive way, including for Member States outside the euro area;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. StressNotes that the relatively good performance of banks during the COVID- 19 crisis is related to the policies implemented by the Member States during the pandemic, as well as to temporary measures under Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation);
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the key role of the EU banking sector in financing the recovery of the European economy, including sufficient funding for SME's;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Supports ongoing work on the implementation of the Basel III rules, that follows the proportionality principles given the specifications and diversity of the EU banking sector;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes that the Basel III implementation needs to provide the banking sector which sufficient margin of manoeuvring their core activities;
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 12 – point 1 (new)
(1) Calls for a timely scrutiny of the development of SME financing by banks and investors against the background that Green Asset Ratio under the Taxonomy Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2020/852, § 8) can consider the loans to SME's only in the division with the consequence of a bad Green Asset Ratio for all banks financing SME's;
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Supports the specification of the public interest assessment criteria so that the SRM is applied in a more consistent and predictable manner; proposes that an alternative liquidation regime for small and medium-sized banks be considered; asks for a more proportionate setting of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) level;
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Notes the ongoing discussion of various concepts for the EDIS and calls for an exemption for banks that have already a well established institutional protection scheme;
Amendment 376 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that the main obstacles for EDIS are concerns about risks in some banking systems; stresses that the implementation of credible and effective risk reduction measures could enable an agreement on EDIS, exempting those institutions which already have a stringent risk sharing scheme in place;
Amendment 388 #
24 a. Recalls that comparable and low NPL rates are a necessary precondition to the implementation of EDIS;