16 Amendments of Delara BURKHARDT related to 2022/2053(INI)
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas sustainable carbon cycles must be considered in a holistic manner, as increasing carbon sinks and replacing fossil carbon as much as possible will require more biomass production, thuswill affecting the land sector; whereas carbon farming schemes can be part of an incentivising market- based toolbox for delivering on climate objectives;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas every tonne of fossil CO2 that is not emitted or is or will be sustainably stored in cycles is the best contribution tovery important in achieving climate targets; whereas storing CO2 from the atmosphere or other cycles should be used as one among many methods for achieving climate targets;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas carbon sequestration practices such as carbon farming can contribute to the availability of new local job opportunities, rural development and to improved social inclusion of rural areas;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that carbon removal practices and efforts should not infringe on the right of people to live in healthy environments, which includes preserving healthy soils; calls on the Commission to devise clear safeguarding policies with the aim to protect this right;
Amendment 231 #
8b. Recognises the value of industrial solutions in carbon sequestration as well as their contribution in reducing carbon emissions; emphasizes that nature-based solutions such as diverse old-growth forests, rewetting of drained wetlands and peatlands, agroforestry and reforestation should be prioritised and incentivised as carbon farming initiatives should not only favour industrial farming models;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Stresses that the impact of nature- based and industrial carbon removal solutions on balancing greenhouse gas emissions is limited, and should not come at the expense of ambitious climate mitigation goals, which require substantial reduction in emissions and not only offsetting;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Welcomes the plan set out by the Commission on how carbon removals can contribute to achieving net negative emissions; calls on the Commission to define a list of practices with the highest absorption potential as an important input for farmers and to further invest in development of accessible and affordable carbon removing technologies;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 e (new)
Paragraph 8 e (new)
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that carbon farming can be a new green business model which should be additional and voluntary, and whichrewards sustainable land management practices that aims to upscale climate mitigation by paying, and which incentivises farmers to implement climate-friendly farm or forest management practices, by tapping into the potential of blue carbon ecosystems and by streamlining the industrial use of carbon sequestered for different purposes;
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that carbon farming must be regulated in line with the current CAP and be seen as a complementary and additional topping-up option; underlines, however, that in the longer term carbon farming should be market-basedto support the achievement of the objectives of the EU Soil Health Law and the EU Nature Restoration Law;
Amendment 365 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Emphasizes the importance of encouraging and funding research aimed at technologies that neutralize carbon captured in geological natural resources, depleted oil and gas reservoirs and saline aquifers;
Amendment 385 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that the new certification framework for carbon farming should be as simple as possible in its design and not result in disproportionataim not to create undue administrative burdens for land and forestry managers and owners; emphasises that the future Union certification framework will need to take into account already existing national initiatives with the same objective;
Amendment 417 #
16a. Welcomes the Commission’s efforts to develop a transparent, bulletproof and scientifically backed EU framework for the certification of carbon removals, based on robust accounting rules; stresses that such framework should not undermine the policies that call for emissions reductions;
Amendment 454 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that carbon farming should be market-based and financed by public and/or private funds; calls on the Commission to create a genuinely new business model for farmers and foresters; notes that financing from the value chain or through the creation of a voluntary carbon market is possiblecould be explored; stresses that the CAP is not a viableshould be a major source of funding, as the CAP is not a business model to ensure that these public resources contribute to climate action;
Amendment 495 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Welcomes the proposal to setup an expert group and proposes to tap into the potential of digital solutions and to set up a knowledge sharing digital platform, which would enable easier stakeholder engagement, sharing knowledge, providing technical advice to the land managers, providing feedback to the Member States' authorities and facilitating establishing and sharing of best practices;