Activities of Joachim KUHS related to 2022/2062(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2022
Amendments (7)
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates itStresses that if the Parliament's call to work only with clients and financial intermediaries that have credible decarbonisation plans; opposes the exemptions granted under the Paris Alignment for Counterparties (PATH) framework in support of REPowerEU; calls for a halt to fossil fuel financing deemed credible is accepted, there will inevitably be additional costs for European citizens, at a time in which they are already facing the consequences of an unprecedented increase in energy prices;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is concerned that the EIB has, at least once, failed to conduct a full inquiry into allegations of bribery and misuse of funds involving a financial intermediary outside the EU; calls on the EIB to reopen all such cases and to disclose annually the rate of recovery of funds lent in the event of proven fraud;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is concerned that the EIB has, at least once, failed to conduct a full inquiry into allegations of bribery and misuse of funds involving a financial intermediary outside the EU; calls on the EIB to reopen all such cases and to freeze projects where credible suspicions of lawbreaking are raised;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Notes with concern the continued increase in administrative overheads, which is mainly due to the rise in staff related costs; calls on the EIB to exercise cost discipline and to preserve the flexibility and efficiency of its management structure;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Calls on the EIB to reopen the fraud case against ECP Africa, to explain how it botched the initial investigation and to look into significant new evidence supporting this, which was not reviewed as part of the initial investigation;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9