7 Amendments of Ewa KOPACZ related to 2021/2060(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
Citation 12 a (new)
— having regard to EU Justice Scoreboard,
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that such guidelines or similar non-legislative tool must clearly state that a child involved in civil, administrative or family law proceedings should be informed at anevery stage of the processdure and that the decision given by the authority should be explained to the child in a manner befitting of their age and maturity by a specially trained professional;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to provide a guide to good practice on the recast of Brussels IIa Regulation;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Calls on the Member States to ensure that financial costs of proceedings and additional costs inherent to cross- border cases are not a barrier to accessing justice in cross-border civil, administrative and family cases involving children; calls on the Member States to make the information on the possible legal aid in such cases available and accessible;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission to continue to expand the research and collection of data on the child-friendly justice and best practices in the field in Member States under the EU Justice Scoreboard;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to collect data on the cross-border civil disputes involving children like custody, access and parental child abduction cases; calls on the Commission to include those data into the EU Justice Scoreboard;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines that mediation can be an effective tool used to protect the best interest of the child in cases of cross- border parental child abductions; points out in this regard to the existing good practices and the use of “Mediators in Court Model” in some Member States for resolving cross-border family disputes in amicable, out-of-court way;