Activities of Martin HLAVÁČEK
Plenary speeches (32)
The 30th Anniversary of the Velvet revolution: importance of the fight for freedom and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe for the historical unification of Europe (debate)
The European Green Deal (debate)
EU Pollinators Initiative (debate)
Farm to Fork Strategy - the key role of farmers and rural areas (debate)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other Regulations (debate)
General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 – all sections (debate)
Digital taxation: OECD negotiations, tax residency of digital companies and a possible European Digital Tax (debate)
European Citizens’ Initiative ‘End the cage age’’ (debate)
Implementation of EU requirements for exchange of tax information (debate)
Pandora Papers: implications on the efforts to combat money laundering, tax evasion and avoidance (debate)
Farm to Fork Strategy (debate)
Common agricultural policy - support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD - Common agricultural policy: financing, management and monitoring - Common agricultural policy – amendment of the CMO and other regulations (debate)
Implementation report on on-farm animal welfare (debate)
Fair and simple taxation supporting the recovery strategy (continuation of debate)
Need for an urgent EU action plan to ensure food security inside and outside the EU in light of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (debate)
Minimum level of taxation for multinational groups (debate)
Striving for a sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture: the way forward (debate)
Impact of new technologies on taxation: crypto and blockchain (debate)
Global food security as follow-up to the G20 Agriculture Ministers meeting (debate)
REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans (debate)
Question Time (Commission) - Food price inflation in Europe
Availability of fertilisers in the EU (debate)
European Citizens’ Initiative "Save bees and farmers! Towards a bee-friendly agriculture for a healthy environment" (debate)
Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCa) - Information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets (recast) (debate)
Ukrainian cereals on the European market (debate)
Ensuring food security and the long-term resilience of EU agriculture (debate)
Need to adopt the “Unshell” Directive on rules to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes (continuation of debate)
Ukrainian grain exports after Russia’s exit from the Black Sea Grain Initiative (debate)
European green bonds (debate)
Establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (‘STEP’) (debate)
Union certification framework for carbon removals
Role of tax policy in times of crisis (debate)
Reports (2)
REPORT on digital taxation: OECD negotiations, tax residency of digital companies and a possible European Digital Tax
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific rules relating to the entry into Northern Ireland from other parts of the United Kingdom of certain consignments of retail goods, plants for planting, seed potatoes, machinery and certain vehicles operated for agricultural or forestry purposes, as well as non-commercial movements of certain pet animals into Northern Ireland
Shadow reports (8)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 as regards the Union contribution for the integrated farm statistics under the 2021-2027 financial framework
REPORT on the impact of new technologies on taxation: crypto and blockchain
REPORT on striving for a sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture: the way forward
REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation
REPORT Role of tax policy in times of crisis
REPORT on further reform of corporate taxation rules
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics
Opinions (4)
OPINION on the proposal for a Council directive restructuring the Union framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (recast)
OPINION on Sustainable Carbon Cycles
OPINION on the implementation report on the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals
Shadow opinions (6)
OPINION on the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan - how to finance the Green Deal
OPINION on the EU-India future trade and investment cooperation
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/842 on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 contributing to climate action to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement
OPINION on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/241 as regards REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060, Regulation (EU) 2021/2115, Directive 2003/87/EC and Decision (EU) 2015/1814
OPINION European protein strategy
Institutional motions (1)
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards sustainability reporting standards
Major interpellations (1)
The surge in commodity and input prices in the agricultural sector
Written questions (2)
Intensive pig farming in certain EU countries
Euro 7/VII regulations
Amendments (1635)
Amendment 25 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Subject to an assessment by the Commission carried out in the context of the regular monitoring of the impact of this Regulation and launched either following a duly substantiated request from a Member State or on the Commission’s own initiative, it is necessary to provide for the possibility to take any necessary measures for imports of any products falling under the scope of this Regulation which are adversely affecting the Union market or the market of one or several Member States for like or directly competing products. There is a particularly precarious situation in the markets for cereals, oil seeds, honey, poultry, eggs, and sugar that may harm Union agricultural producers if imports from Ukraine were to increase. It is appropriate to introduce an automatic safeguard for cereals, oil seeds, honey, eggs, poultry, and sugar products that is activated if quantities imported pursuant to this Regulation exceed the arithmetic mean of quantities in 20221 and 20232.
Amendment 35 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13 a) The Commission should propose a comprehensive system of import and export licences with Ukraine, to allow detailed monitoring of agricultural products from their entry into an EU Member State to their destination into the EU and to third countries.
Amendment 38 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, where a three-month period EU average price of a product covered by that paragraph originating in Ukraine declines below 15% of the average price for last seven years, excluding the best and the worst years, the customs duties to imports of that product shall apply in the amount of 80% of the difference between the market price and that three-month period EU average price as of the first day of the month following that three-month period. Where an economic operator sufficiently proves the export of that product outside the EU within three months following its import, the customs duties imposed to that import shall be reimbursed.
Amendment 39 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) compliance with the applicable EU standards for products intended for the EU market,
Amendment 48 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall monitor the entry of products referred to in Article 1.1 of this Regulation as well as oilseed products when entering any EU Member States. In order to have as comprehensive monitoring as possible, systems, including licencing systems, should be used.
Amendment 69 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
If, during the period 6 June to 31 December 2024, cumulative import volumes of either cereals, oil seeds, honey, eggs, poultry or sugar since 1 January 2024 reach the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 20221 and 20232, the Commission shall, within 21 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards established by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/478:
Amendment 71 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
If, during the period 6 June to 31 December 2024, cumulative import volumes of either wheat, eggs, poultry, honey or sugar since 1 January 2024 reach the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded in 20221 and 20232, the Commission shall, within 21 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards established by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/478:
Amendment 97 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
If, during the period 1 January to 5 June 2025, cumulative import volumes of either eggscereals, oil seeds, eggs, honey, poultry or sugar for the period since 1 January 2025 reach five twelfths of the respective arithmetic mean of import volumes recorded 20221 and 20232,the Commission shall, within 21 days and after informing the Committee on Safeguards, reintroduce for that product the corresponding tariff- rate quota suspended by Article 1(1), point b.
Amendment 113 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
For the purposes of this paragraph, the terms eggscereals, oil seeds, eggs, honey, poultry and sugar refer to all products covered by the tariff-rate quotas in the Appendix to Annex I-A of the Association Agreement for, respectively, eggs and albumins, poultry meat and poultry meat preparations, and sugars, and the arithmetic mean shall be calculated by dividing the sum of import volumes in 20221 and 20232 by two.
Amendment 115 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
For the purposes of this paragraph, the terms wheat, eggs, poultry, honey and sugar refer to all products covered by the tariff-rate quotas in the Appendix to Annex I-A of the Association Agreement for, respectively, eggs and albumins, poultry meat and poultry meat preparations, and sugars, and the arithmetic mean shall be calculated by dividing the sum of import volumes in 20221 and 20232 by two.
Amendment 130 #
2024/0028(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Reports The European Commission shall present by 31 May 2024 a report to the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers on the monthly flows of imports into the European Union of Ukrainian agricultural products, such as cereals and oilseeds, not covered by Article 4 of this Regulation, comparing these volumes with the imports recorded in the years 2021 and 2022. The report shall also describe the evolution of market prices in the European Union. It shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal for the application of safeguard measures to those products.
Amendment 30 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the ECB is politically independent, which means that neither EU institutions and agencies nor Member State governments should seek to influence it; stresses that this independence must remain untouched at all times; emphasises that this independence requires the ECB to refrain from taking political decisions;
Amendment 47 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the role of the ECB in safeguarding euroRecalls that the ECB is the institution responsible for maintaining price stability; underlines that the statutory independence of the ECB, as laid down in the Treaties, is a prerequisite for it to fulfil its mandate of maintaining price stability;
Amendment 105 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Echoes President Lagarde’s warning that fiscal support should be targeted and limited and should not hinder the task of monetary policy; recalls that the Economic and Monetary Union requires solid fiscal policies in Member States in order to be able to respond to external shocks; points out that governments, as well as the Commission, can support citizens and industries not only through fiscal measures, but also by focusing on growth-enhancing reforms;
Amendment 136 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Underlines the pivotal role of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the EU's economy and economic and social convergence and employment; is especially concerned about the effect that the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine have on SMEs;
Amendment 139 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Fully supports President Lagarde’s statement on fighting inflation for as long as necessaryStresses that further measures must be taken to respond to the rising inflation; applauds President Lagarde’s plea for humility and to regularly update the ECB’s models; invites the ECB, however, to fundamentally review its models and their role in its policymaking;
Amendment 149 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. TrustNotes that the ECB will deliver on its mandate to safeguard price stability; notes that real interest rates are still negativereal interest rates are still negative; reminds that price stability is far from being reached;
Amendment 163 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Supports the ECB’s decision to scale back its asset-purchasing programmes, in view of the excess liquidity in the market; noteregrets the ECB’s announcement to decarbonise its corporate bond holdings by ‘tilting’ its portfolio, which violates the principle of market neutrality; stresses the importance of the quality of the collateral;
Amendment 203 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Takes note of the ECB’s progress on the digital euro project and welcomes its dialogue with Parliament in this regard; reiterates that a digital euro must respect competition in the banking landscape, must not endanger the existence or use of cashinsists that the digital Euro must not replace cash as means of payment and must respect the privacy of citizens and businesses;
Amendment 210 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Reminds the ECB that Cash Payments are still a very important form of payments, and that it should not further reduce the amount of denominations in circulation;
Amendment 213 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Welcomes the Basel III framework, as it will strengthen the resilience of the banking sector; warns about the risk of non-complianceunderlines the importance of taking European specificities into account, ensuring the competitiveness of European banks and an international level playing field;
Amendment 237 #
2023/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Invites the ECB to engage in a dialogue with national parliaments, while strictly respecting its political independence; believes that this would strengthen the legitimacy and policies of the ECB;
Amendment 1 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to Protocol No 12 to the TEU and TFEU on the excessive deficit procedure,
Amendment 13 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 30 a (new)
Citation 30 a (new)
– having regard to the Departmental Paper DP/2022/014 of the International Monetary Fund of September 2022 entitled ‘Reforming the EU Fiscal Framework: Strengthening the Fiscal Rules and Institutions’,
Amendment 32 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to decrease to 83.1 % in the EU (90.4 % in the euro area); whereas the debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to marginally decline in the EU to around 82.7 % in 2024 and 82.5 % in 2025; whereas there is a high variation in the debt levels of different Member States;
Amendment 36 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas according to the Commission’s autumn forecast, government deficit is expected to decline to 3.2% of GDP in 2023 and to further decrease to 2.8% of GDP in 2024 and 2.7% in 2025;
Amendment 49 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas EU funding has proven to be an essential tool to providecontributed to macroeconomic stabilisation at EU level and to increase of its internal and external resilience in times of crisis while supporting Member States in financing necessary investments in EU priorities to tackle current and future challenges;
Amendment 60 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Expresses concern about the weak growth in the EU; notes the continuous impact of energy prices and inflation on the purchasing power of households and on the ability to perform of EU companies; calls on the Member States to take further steps to overcome those difficulties while not distorting competition on the single market;
Amendment 86 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that a lack of public and private investments in certain Member States is hindering the potential of sustainable growth; highlights that these investments are crucial formay increase the EU’s ability to cope with existing challenges and increase the EU’s resilience and competitiveness during upcoming challenges;
Amendment 108 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the European Semester is the established framework for coordinating the budgetary, economic, social and employment policies across the Union in accordance with the Treaties, including the European Pillar of Social Rights, thereby safeguarding its macroeconomic stability and its social cohesion;
Amendment 118 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. ICalls concerned about the deterioration of the social dimension of the European Semester resulting from the self-limitation of country-specific recommendations (CSRs) to the implementation of national recovery and resilience plans (RRPs) and about the declining number of social CSRs based on the Social Scoreboard; calls on the Commission to link the CSRs more closely to the respective country the Commission to link the CSRs more closely to the respective country reports and to efficiently monitor the implementation of the CSRs and the relevant repfortms;
Amendment 123 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Shares the view that the 2024 CSRs need to be focused on a limited set of challenges; underlines that CSRs must equally serve to enhance competitiveness, promote the green and digital transitions and ensure social fairness; stresses that CSRs nee and macroeconomic stability and to take account of social vulnerabilities;
Amendment 137 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Is concerned that the performance-based financing and verification system of the RRF delivers in practice too little in terms of results and creates too much bureaucracy; cCalls for more flexibility to adjust milestones and targets to take account of lessons learned during the implementation process;
Amendment 150 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Supports streamlining EU cohesion policy programmes with investment needs identified under the RRF and in CSRs; recalls that cohesion policy serves a broader set of objectives than the RRF; calls for a comparable incorporation of stakeholder participation in the drafting and implementation of national RRPs as it is for cohesion policy programmes;
Amendment 157 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers it necessary to reform the EU fiscal rules and welcomes the proposals put forward by the CommissionHighlights the need to reform the current EU‘s economic governance framework in the wake of the deactivation of the escape clause; takes note of the proposals put forward by the Commission in order to ensure sufficient debt reduction and compliance with the EU Treaties; calls on the adoption of the review as soon as possible;
Amendment 170 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the reform must lead to a simplification of the framework, be more country-specific and strengthen its enforceability, and and to an increase of its enforceability; highlights that the new framework should be more country-specific and increase national ownership in order to ensure debt sustainability; notes that the review shall also enable Member States to meet the public investment needs for the green and digital transitions of among otheir economkey priorities without undermining the sustainability of government debt;
Amendment 184 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes that lessons have been learned fromTakes note of the design choices of the RRF in linking national fiscal, reform and investment commitments with EU financial incentives such as grants and loans; greatly regrets that, unlike the RRF,notes that the reform of the economic governance framework lacks the incentive mechanisms to support and promote necessaryincentivises national policy reforms and investments; is concerned that some Member States will not have the financial capacity to finance the just green and digital transition on their ownn key strategic areas through additional flexibility in the trajectories;
Amendment 187 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls for granting Independent Fiscal Institutions the powers and the means to monitor the proposals for adjustment trajectories, medium-term fiscal plans and implementation reports submitted by Member States as part of the new framework; calls for the adoption of the European Fiscal Board that gives the body enough means and autonomy to develop its functions;
Amendment 191 #
2023/2063(INI)
12. DeploreHighlights that the interplay between macroeconomic imbalances and fiscal rules is not sufficiently addressed by the reform proposalnew fiscal rules should not undermine the necessary reforms of Member States´ public finances; underlines that the financial stability of the EU depends on the macroeconomic balance between Member States’ economies and that restoring such a balance may require public spending;
Amendment 201 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Acknowledges the need to avoid enduring excessive deficits and calls for common rules based on objective criteria as a way to achieve this goal; stresses that, in return, those rules should not preclude temporary deviations from the net expenditure path due to dedicated, exceptional, justifiable and strategically significant investments realising EU objectives;
Amendment 207 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Acknowledges the differences between individual Member States regarding the sustainability of their debt and their capacity to reduce debt while still being able to invest; emphasises therefore the need to allow Member States to have different debt reduction paths;
Amendment 218 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the fact that the Commission negotiates with the Member States individual fiscal-structural plans; underlines that such an increase in discretionary power for the Commission must be accompanied by increased accountability toasks the Commission to take into account as much as possible the plans that Member States put forwards the European Parliamentmselves;
Amendment 229 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Considers the stronger involvement of national parliaments, taking into account the national legal framework, in determining the content and voting on fiscal structural plans to be a meaningful way to increase national ownership of fiscal structural plans;
Amendment 240 #
2023/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Recognises that the Economic Dialogue as part of the European Semester lays a useful foundation of accountability, but considers that proper accountability can only be achieved if the European Parliament has accountability instruments that allow it to apply consequences based on its assessment of the performance of the European Semester such as veto rights or holding Commissioners personally responsible;
Amendment 9 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the economic recovery and the climate crisis increase the need to mobilise more resources and re-evaluate current taxation policies in the Member Statesto improve tax collection;
Amendment 21 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas some analysis show that rising corporate profits account for almost half of the increase in inflation in the EU over the past two years, as companies increased prices by more than the spiking costs of imported energy;
Amendment 27 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the growing trend of cross- border teleworkers, including digital nomads, has created difficultinew challenges for the taxation of labour income;
Amendment 29 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas over the years, in cases of some Member States, the tax incidence has shifted from wealth to income, from capital income to labour income and consumption, from multinational enterprises (MNEs) to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and from the financial sector to the real economy; nevertheless a number of measures have been already introduced to overcome such a trend;
Amendment 36 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas thsome EU Member States rely disproportionately on labouron income taxes, social contributions and indirect taxes, such as the value added tax (VAT) or excise duties;
Amendment 48 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas concerns have been raised about the potential double taxation of Ukrainian refugees who continue to perform their duties for their Ukrainian employer while working remotely from their host countries, and about the lack of a common EU approach onthere is a common understanding to find a solution for this matter;
Amendment 75 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that tax systems and fiscal capacities in the Member States are facing severe shockchallenges, an ageing population and challenges related to the green transition, the digital transformation of their labour markets and the existing tax gap9 , all of which emphasise the need for large public investments in order to achieve a sustainable economic recovery, mobilise private capital and attract entrepreneurship; _________________ 9 European Commission, ‘Tax policies in the European Union – 2020 survey’, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020.
Amendment 79 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with concern that the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the subsequent energy-price shock and inflation are highly regressive, with the poorest households being hit the hardest; observes that effective tax rates rose significantly for families with children, particularly at lower income levels10 ; notes with concern that gender inequality worsened during the pandemic; and regrets that the recent crises have also significantly affected the EU SMEs; _________________ 10 OECD, ‘Double blow for workers as inflation drives real wages down and labour taxes up’, 25 April 2023.
Amendment 84 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Observes that COVID-19 financial aid in the form of tax deductions and tax credits helped many companies to overcome the negative consequences of the COVID-19 crisis, however, had a limited impact on those in the greatest need, such as the unemployed, students, pensioners, unreported workers and part- time workers;
Amendment 90 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Observes with concern that inflation has been partially driven by some companies increasing their profit margins, with, for example, Maersk’s annual pre-tax income soaring from USD 967 million in 2019 to USD 30.2 billion in 2022; and at the same time notes with concern that a number of the EU companies, namely SMEs, as well as households, have been suffering from high inflation;
Amendment 98 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the fact thatIs of the view that MNEs that realise excess profits in times of crisis and wealthy individuals who realise significant capital gains through speculation are often undertaxed; notes that a number of EU companies, namely SMEs, have had to cease their operation as a consequence of crisis;
Amendment 104 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned that the impact of temporary VAT reductions for end consumers was limited in some cases and was more pronounced for companies that increased their profit margins because of these reductions;
Amendment 110 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Respects that each Member State is entitled to set its tax mix according to its needs, especially in the social and economic area, however, regrets that, in the overall tax mix, environmental taxation remains underutilised in thsome EU Member States; regrets that fossil fuel subsidies remain high; observes that, overall, the tax systems in thsome Member States are not responding to the climate and biodiversity crises and are contributing insufficiently to reaching the EU’s climate goals;
Amendment 119 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to consider the ‘COVID-19 precedent’ for the taxation of cross-border workers as regards the tax treatment of Ukrainian refugees, which would entail disregarding the additional days spent in the host country for the calculation of the 183-day rule; recommends that the Member States’ national tax authorities offer tax guidance to refugees andin order to reduce administrative complications;
Amendment 125 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that, in light of the many crises faced by the Member States, the EU should seize the opportunity to carry out a full-scale and holistic analysis of its tax systemsestablish a robust legal framework with clear rules so that Member States can quickly introduce necessary tax measures and subsequently abolish once not necessary, in order to respond more effectively to future crises and to avoid a lengthy approval procedure;
Amendment 132 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive evaluation followed by an action plan on important areas for reform in order to strengthening the Member States’ tax systems, where appropriate, by making them future and crisis proof, including through the simplification of their national tax systems; calls for the Commission to come forward with a tax proposal under Article 116 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to solve specific tax distortions in the Member States;
Amendment 139 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to assess the effectiveness of the temporary tax incentives, including VAT reductions, applied in Member States and their impact on the EU Single Market and competitiveness, and to take measures if deemed necessary;
Amendment 147 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights that environmental taxes and well-designed incentives have the potential to both cover the need for additional revenues and support a carbon- free economy; calls on the Member States to finally agree on the proposed revision of the Energy Taxation Directive,11 taking into account the needs of individual Member States; _________________ 11 Commission proposal of 14 July 2021 for a Council directive restructuring the Union framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (COM(2021)0563).
Amendment 150 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Notes that in current challenging economic climate, the sustainable tax revenue is crucial; highlights the need to focus on reduction of tax frauds and evasion, especially in the area of indirect taxation; calls on the Member States to use the current tools more effectively or to introduce the new ones in order to eliminate fraudulent practices as much as possible;
Amendment 160 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes with concern that income inequality has increased in the last 30 years, with wealth being even more concentrated than income and capital gains being mostly realised by the top decile of the population; considers that the Member States should more effectively redistribute income and wealth throughalls on the Commission to analyse if the taxation of capital gains, property and wealth could bring the expected results; supports calls to start international-level negotiations to establish a progressive wealth tax, in the same vein as the OECD/G20 global tax deal for corporationsdiscussions to assess advantages and disadvantages of possible introduction of a progressive wealth tax;
Amendment 164 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Takes the view that, as the recent crisis have clearly shown that not all companies or citizens are harmed in the same way, the targeted tax policy can deliver better results than a more general approach, and that tax measures taken by Member States should in future be targeted at those who really need them;
Amendment 177 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the adopted solidarity contribution in the EU; regrets, however, its limited scope and short time span; calls on the Commission to considanalyse whether a permanent excess profit tax on all sectors, in light of the growing evidence that inflation is partly profit driven; believes that such taxes wouldcould contribute to curbing the oligopolistic power of certain companies and boost competitiveness, while fighting inflation and raising revenue;
Amendment 185 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. RegretNotes that the shipping industry is under-taxed and even excluded from the OECD/G20 Pillar Two agreement; supports the call for a multilateral initiative to tax international shipping activities from a profit and carbon perspective;
Amendment 191 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for a multilateral initiative at the UN or G20OECD Inclusive Forum to introduce minimum carbon tax standards, including a minimum rate;
Amendment 197 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Observes with concern that private jet flights have exponentially increased in the EU in the past few crisis years; calls for an EU-wide prohibitive tax ontax on aircrafts, including private jets;
Amendment 208 #
2023/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Observes that eliminating tax- related disincentives for female employment and unequal distribution of paid and unpaid work is one of the most critical objectives of tax policy from a gender- equality perspective; calls on the Commission to provide guidance on taking gender equality into account in tax policy design and tax administration; notes the need to improve the collection of gender- disaggregated data;
Amendment 3 #
2023/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas rural areas face the urgent challenges of demographic decline and ageing, especially affecting EU farming populations, along with rural abandonment, lack of or poor access to public and private infrastructure and services, including particularly digital infrastructure, mobility, healthcare and social services, education and training, as well as low incomes and fewer job opportunities;
Amendment 7 #
2023/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas SME play a particularly important role in rural areas as employers, as facilitators of a diversification of farm income and as sponsors of social and cultural life and thus help to make rural areas more attractive to young people;
Amendment 9 #
2023/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the digital and green transitions offer opportunities for stronger, connected, resilient, innovative and prosperous rural areas in the long term; whereas an up-to-date digital infrastructure is a precondition for digital and smart farming solutions and hence the success of the green transition, as well as a key enabler for competitive SME in rural areas;
Amendment 22 #
2023/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that small and family farms and SME are the backbone of EU rural areas, providing food security and ecosystem services for European citizens;
Amendment 27 #
2023/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of improving the policy coherence and rural proofing of future EU initiatives to effectively prevent rural depopulation and to facilitate generational renewal, broadband access and job creation in rural areas; Stresses the importance of implementing a rural proofing mechanism for all EU initiatives so as to assess the coherence and complementarity of EU policies and their potential impact on rural areas to ensure that they are fit for purpose; underlines the importance of involving local and regional authorities in the definition and implementation of rural proofing mechanisms;
Amendment 43 #
2023/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the potential of the LEADER community-led local development method (CLLD)1 to engage rural communities in local action groups for the preparation and implementation of targeted local development strategies; stresses nonetheless that the Commission should continuously evaluate the costs and benefits of LEADER to ensure that the risk associated of potential misuse of distributed funds is reduced to a minimum, while ensuring that the programme effectively facilitates local engagement and that administrative requirements must match the size and structure and of local community to ensure that they do not create avoidable obstacles for new initiatives; _________________ 1 https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/leader- clld/leader-toolkit/leaderclld- explained_en.html.
Amendment 54 #
2023/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States to make effective use of the various funding opportunities also with a view to improving the prospects of SMEs, given their major role in generating employment in rural areas, and calls on the Commission to monitor and assess whether its support reaches rural areas and benefits their communities;
Amendment 6 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas only the Netherlands has submitted updated EMPs for approval, namely in 2011 and again in 2018Member States are taking action and are implementing their EMPs in different ways based on their national administrative tradition; whereas more action is needed in terms of implementing measures and, where necessary, updating their EMPs;
Amendment 13 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make full use of the Eel Regulation as the core policy for eel protection once againmanagement, ensuring a holistic and coherent approach; reiterate which also includes fully implementing measures in other relevant areas outside of fisheries; recalls that the Eel Regulation was found to be fit for purpose by the Commission evaluation of 2020; is of the opinion that better implementation of the Eel Regulation and additional actions by Member States are needed;
Amendment 21 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that some data shows that the decline in stocks in some areas has halted since the adoption of the Eel Regulation, indicating that the Eel Regulation is showing some positive preliminary results, but thathowever to a large extent the decrees in the stocks are still persisting and thus consequently recovery will be a long- term process over several decades;
Amendment 26 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that managing the eel stock is too complex for a one-sided marine- oriented approach; highlights the fact that focusing on annual fishing opportunities does notis a very ill-suited measure to properly take into account important factors such as migration barriers, habitat quality and illegal catches and trade; underlines that the Eel Regulation is holistic and comprehensive, captures both the marine and freshwater life stages of the eel and addresses both fisheries and non- fisheries impacts; points out, in addition, that non- fisheries impacts may be bigger than the fisheries impacts anshould be fully taken into account, based on an ecosystem based approach; is concerned that far too little attention has been given thus far to non-fishery anthropogenic mortalities; is of the opinion that measures taken outside of the context of the Eel Regulation undermine the coherence of adopted policy; deplores, therefore, the non- holistic approach taken in, Council Regulation (EU) 2023/194 of 30 January 2023 fixing for 2023 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, as well as fixing for 2023 and 2024 such fishing opportunities for certain deep- sea fish stocks, restricting eel fisheries with a 6-month closing period, without a full package of measures ensuring proper management measures as well as the appropriate support to the affected fisheries;
Amendment 36 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls, therefore, for the creation of an eel-specific advisory counciltransboundary group with representatives from the Member States and the fishing sector, recreational fishers, water managers, hydro-power companies, conservationists and other relevant parties; suggests that this advisory councilgroup should be tasked with advising the Commission on the implementation of the Eel Regulation, providing feedback to Member States on their EMPs, exchanging information between the different parties and evaluating the progress on implementation at national and European level;
Amendment 42 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets the fact that only one Member State has submitted an updated EMP for approval since the adoption of the Eel Regulation; urges the Member States to regularly update their EMPs, based on the best available knowledge and advice; encouragescalls on the Member States to put concrete targets and intermediate deadlines in their updated EMPs; stresses that the recovery of the eel is a long-term process that requires continuous effort and that a one- time management plan will not be sufficient;
Amendment 44 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Regrets the fact that the number of Member States adhering to the reporting requirement under Article 9(1) of the Eel Regulation has declined over the years; reminds the Member States of their obligations under Article 9(1) importance of fulfilling their obligations in this regard; highlights the fact that it is vital to gather as much information and data as possible in order to be able to take appropriate measures;
Amendment 48 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the important role that eel fisheries play in societywithin their local communities, with eel fishing being both a socio-economic activity and a cultural, centuries-old tradition; considernotes that eel fishing has reduced significantly in the past decade; calls on the Commission and the Member States to refrain as much as possible from placing further restrictions on fisheries; underlines that fishers have an important role to play as guardians and ‘eyes and ears’, while and when needed to ensure that appropriate compensation and support are provided; underlines that fishers have an important role to play in gathering data and being ‘eyes and ears’ in relation the daily activities at Sea; points out the risk that a full closure of fisheries could lead to more illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing; points out that eel fisheries carry out a small-scale, artisanal activity and are often located in rural and remote areas, where fishers play an important economic, environmental and social role;
Amendment 53 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses its hope that where further restrictions on fisheries might be necessary, this is done in a holistic way, preferably in the context of the national EMPs and not in the form of ad hoc Council decisions, and based on prior socio-economic impact assessments; regardless they must all be based on the best scientific advice and on a prior socio-economic impact assessments; urges therefore the Member States to more actively use and update the EMPs in order to avoid ad hoc Council decisions;
Amendment 59 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Reaffirms that restocking is one of the recovery measures listed under Article 2(8) of the Eel Regulation; is of the view that restocking is a necessary measure until the problem of migration barriers is solved adequately; calls on the Member States to continue the practice of restocking, including with EMFAF support; highlights the fact that, although the contribution of restocking to stock recovery at an international level cannot be ascertained, it can have positive effects at local level, mainly on the fish biodiversity; is of the opinion that restocking is a way of spreading and limiting risks for the recovery of the stock, considering the increasing drought that is causing problems in rivers throughout Europe; points out, furthermore, that catches for restocking are relatively low (2-3 % of all glass eels); stresses that glass eel catches are crucial for the European aquaculture sector and recognises the important role of aquaculture in restocking;
Amendment 61 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Reaffirms that restocking is one of the recovery measures listed under Article 2(8) of the Eel Regulation; is of the view that restocking is a necessary measure until the problem of migration barriers is solved adequately; calls, in this regard, on the Member States to continue the practice of restocking; highlights the fact that, although the contribution of restocking to stock recovery at an international level cannot be ascertained, it can have positive effects at local level; is of the opinion that restocking is a way of spreading and limiting risks for the recovery of the stock, considering the increasing drought that is causing problems in rivers throughout Europe; points out, furthermore, that catches for restocking are relatively low (2- 3 % of all glass eels); stresses that glass eel catches are crucial for the European aquaculture sector and recognises the important role of aquaculture in restocking;
Amendment 72 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States, within the extent possible, to give flexibility to fishers in determining the most suitable periods to fish, which can differ per country; encourages the Member States, in this regard, to consider, in consultation with fishers, the use of quota systems, in order to keep fishing at responsible levels; highlights that one of the advantages of a quota system would be that it enables fishers to choose to fish at times when it is commercially interesting to do so, while limiting catches to a responsible level; adds that this could contribute to preventing overfishing;
Amendment 75 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that there are fish- friendly alternatives on the market to make water pumps and hydro-power stations passable for fish; calls on the Member States to make fish safety a mandatory requirement for new installations and for old ones when they are replaced; calls for considering this requirement to be mandatory at the EU level by revising the Eel regulation; points out that a common methodology might be needed in order to determine and certify when pumps can be considered fish friendly; highlights that the existing Royal Netherlands Standardisation Institute (NEN) standard 87759 in the Netherlands could serve as an example; the appropriate measures and possible motivation incentives for energy plant owners could be further discussed and explored within the eel-specific group. _________________ 9 NEN 8775:2020+C1:2022 nl.
Amendment 77 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines that there are fish- friendly alternatives on the market to make water pumps and hydro-power stations passable for fish; calls on the Member States to make fish safety a mandatory requirement for new installations and for old ones when they are replaced; points out that a common methodology might be needed in order to determine and certify when pumps can be considered fish friendly; highlights that the existing Royal Netherlands Standardisation Institute (NEN) standard 87759 in the Netherlands could serve as an example; _________________ 9 NEN 8775:2020+C1:2022 nl.could facilitate the deployment of infrastructure that will certify when pumps can be considered fish friendly;
Amendment 83 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. ENotes that eel fisheries in marine waters in some parts of the EU only accounts for around 3% of eel mortality; encourages the Member States also to take measures against other anthropogenic mortality factors, such as pollution and parasitewhich some reports say accounts for up to 49% of mortality rate; highlights in this regard the need for proper management of other species affecting the eel population, such as cormorants and another fish predators;
Amendment 84 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Encourages the Member States also to take measures against other anthropogenic mortality factors, such as pollution and parasiteNotes that eel fisheries in marine waters in some parts of the EU only accounts for around 3% of eel mortality; encourages the Member States also to take measures against other anthropogenic mortality factors, which some reports say accounts for up to 49% of mortality rate; highlights in this regard the need for proper management of other species affecting the eel population, such as cormorants;
Amendment 87 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Recognises the importance of civil society organisations and for individuals engaging in recreational fisheries activities, including conservation projects; notes that these activities plays an important part in the social cohesion of local and rural communities;
Amendment 88 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Underlines that IUU fishing and illegal trade continue to present a significant problem; commends the current successes of law enforcement and stresses the importance of preventing further trafficking, including by customs authorities; stresses that more checks on and monitoring of the Eel Regulation are needed;
Amendment 90 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for better coordination of customs, police and environmental authorities in and between the Member States as well as further cooperation with third countries, as well as exchange of data; calls on the Member States to continue to invest in the expertise and capacity of law enforcement;
Amendment 91 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for better coordination of customs, police and, environmental and scientific authorities in and between the Member States, as well as exchange of data; calls on the Member States to continue to invest in the expertise and capacity of law enforcement;
Amendment 102 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses that data collection, monitoring and reporting should be harmonised and standardised so that data can be compared; recommends that commercial and recreational fishersfishers, where appropriate, should be involved in the collection and analysis of data;
Amendment 103 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Encourages the Member States to put in place more transboundary EMPs, where appropriate; highlights the importance of the Commission to support and facilitate such work by the Member States;
Amendment 106 #
2023/2030(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on the Commission and the relevant Member States to haveto work for an ambitious and realistic General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean management plan for eel; believes that it is highly desirable for this plan to be aligned with the Eel Regulation;
Amendment 5 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to recognise, in theensure that the upcoming European pProtein sStrategy, recognises the strategic role of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors as suppliers of marine-derivedaquatic protein of the highest quality with one of the lowest carbon footprints;
Amendment 8 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that the good health of marine resources such as fish stocks, and by extension the supply of marine proteins, depends on the good condition of marine ecosystems;
Amendment 9 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Notes that EU consumption of fish and shellfish in 2021 amounted to 10,41 million tonnes while EU export amounted to 2,56 million tonnes and EU imports to 6,15 million tonnes; notes that in 2021 consumption of fish and seafood products at home increased by 7% compared to 2020;
Amendment 9 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to the JRC study of July 2020 on Future of the EU livestock: how to contribute to a sustainable agricultural sector? (ISBN: 978-92-76- 20624-8 doi: 10.2762/3440 KF-02-20-525- EN-N)
Amendment 10 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Highlights that fisheries and aquaculture products have a low carbon footprint; believes that the fisheries and aquaculture sectors can represent real assets to tackle the climate crisis and to provide healthy food for a growing global population; indicates the strategic value of aquatic foods to reach the objectives of the European Green Deal and to contribute to several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) such as SDG 2 “Zero hunger”, SDG 3 "Good health and well-being", SDG 12 "Responsible consumption and production", SDG 13 "Climate action" and SDG 14 “Life below water”;
Amendment 11 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Notes that WHO considers that fish with unsaturated fats constitute a good source of protein and fat in a healthy diet; considers that consumers are more conscious of the food that they consume and how it has been produced;
Amendment 14 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to the UN FAO report of 2022 on Thinking about the future of food safety (ISBN 978-92-5- 135783-5) on food allergies to certain types of novel foods and protein sources,
Amendment 16 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the central role of fisheries and fisheryaquaculture and their products in ensuring food security and in any nutritional strategy based on healthy and high-quality protein; considers it therefore necessary to strengthen the competitiveness of the European fisheries and aquaculture sectors as suppliers of the highest quality food with the best sustainability standards worldwide in order to reduce the EU’s growing dependence on imports;
Amendment 18 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
– having regard to the Dublin Declaration of 2022 on Societal role of meat (The Dublin Declaration),
Amendment 20 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates its concerns in relation to unsustainable fishmeal and fish oil as expressed in its resolution on Striving for a sustainable and competitive EU Aquaculture; underlines that some feed production practices like producing fish meal can have a severe impact on stocks and ultimately jeopardize food security, notably in some countries in Africa ; recalls that fish meal production must be sustainable and shall primarily come from fisheries products that is not primarily used for human consumption;
Amendment 23 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Amendment 25 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Stresses that 3.3 billion people in the world rely up to 20% on fisheries and aquaculture products for their animal protein intake and that in some coastal states and small island developing States these products contribute to half or more of total animal protein intake; insists that the implementation of sustainable fisheries partnership agreements (SFPAs) must be in line with the best scientific advice available to ensure sustainable fishing operations that only utilise the surplus allowable catch in the partner country and that sectoral support should contribute to the sustainable development of the fisheries sector, notably via support for small-scale fisheries, while also strengthening local food security and local communities;
Amendment 28 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the efforts ofalready made by the European fishing sector to improve the state of stocks at EU level; emphasises, in this regard, the need for continueds efforts as this sector plays an essential role in ensuring European food sovereigntecurity; underlines that such efforts shall be accompanied, as the fishing sector shall not bear alone the cost of the transition towards a more sustainable fishery;
Amendment 32 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Points out the potential that innovation and new business can bring in terms of new feeds with lower carbon footprint and lower impact on biodiversity such as insects and algae; calls on the Commission to come forward with legislative proposals that will help to address the increasing food price crisis in the EU whiles stimulating development of new innovative production techniques
Amendment 39 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase the role of local fishery and aquaculture products in their nutritional policies and programmes, in particular by promoting their consumption among specific groups, such as young people, or in programmes aimed at tackling specific nutritional deficiencies;
Amendment 43 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Reiterates its demands in its resolution on a Striving for a sustainable and competitive EU aquaculture: the way forward in relation to creating a business friendly regulatory environment including simplified permitting procedures and a regulatory framework that supports the development of sustainable aquaculture;
Amendment 49 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Reiterates its calls made in its opinion on a Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly food system in relation to making more information available to the consumer on the environmental impact of different food products, including proteins as well as information on its production;
Amendment 59 #
2023/2015(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. WBelcomeieves that the Commission should build the upcoming European Protein Strategy on initiatives such as the Commission communication of 15 November 2022 entitled ‘“Towards a Strong and Sustainable EU Algae Sector’”2; points out that algae and microalgae can represent an important complementary source of protein in sustainable food production and global food security and calls on the Commission to include this untapped potential in the European protein strategy. _________________ 2 COM(2022)0592.
Amendment 67 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas plant-based proteins are crucial fora circular economy and sustainable production of all available types of protein is key to enabling the transition towards moretruly sustainable food systems with a reduced climate impact;
Amendment 109 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the market for sustainanly produced animal, plant-based and alternative sources of protein food is steadily increasing due to consumer demand;
Amendment 124 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas production of aquatic and aquaculture protein has a crucial role in global food security and nutrition and healthy balance diet;
Amendment 136 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas cell-based agriculture and seafood farming are promising and under specific circumstances could be innovative solutions;
Amendment 155 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas interest in insects for human and animal consumpthe potential of insects’ based protein for human and especially animal nutrition is growing; and could significantly reduce EU’s protein import dependency
Amendment 171 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas research and innovation on plantsustainable production of all sources of proteins needs to be scaled up;
Amendment 187 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas it is important to adopt a value chain approach in order to create added value for plant-based protein sources;to create added value for sustainably produced proteins it is important to have a value chain approach
Amendment 198 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a comprehensive EU protein strategy covering the sustainable production of all types of proteins (animal, plant-alternative) in the EU and introducing effective measures tohat enable the increase of the EU’s production of proteiuropean autonomy in protein production in the short, medium and long term;
Amendment 228 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 2
Paragraph 2 – point 2
2. Better conditions for more sustainable protein production in the EU;
Amendment 241 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 3
Paragraph 2 – point 3
3. TWhere needed a development of plant-based and alternative protein sources for food and feed;
Amendment 263 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 5 a (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 5 a (new)
5a. Principles of circular economy
Amendment 298 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that the protein strategy should acknowledge the sustainable development of all possible protein sources; and their role in circular economy
Amendment 363 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights that a competitive agriculture sector is dependent on sustainable and affordable inputs such as feed additivesenergy feed, good plant material, fertilisers and healthy soilssoils of good quality and conditions ;
Amendment 393 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to propose medium- and long-term policy measures to close the nutrient loop, such as enabling the use of recovered nitrogen from manure (RENURE) products and food industry waste;
Amendment 409 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses that, in order to boost investments in healthier soils and new crop rotation practices, long-term goals need to be compatible with strong ownership rightsand evaluation based on societal services need to go hand in hand ;
Amendment 417 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Subheading 4
Developing proper complementarity of plant-based and alternative proteins for the current food and feed systems
Amendment 433 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the big potential of sustainably produced plant-based protein and the fact that the development of the sector willanimal-based protein and their indispensable role with regard to an added benefit to European farmers, circular economy, soil quality, biodiversity, the climate and human health;
Amendment 503 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that insects should be considered as promising alternative and circular sources of protein, particularly for animal nutrition;
Amendment 519 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Is of the opinion that authorisations made solely through novel food legislation should be based on the safety of the producthighest food safety assurances of the product for human consumption;
Amendment 539 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for more research and development into plant-based and alternative proteins sustainable production of all types of proteins in the EU;
Amendment 678 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point ix
Paragraph 32 – point ix
ix. A front- of- packing label regulation that compares the carbon footprint of food and feed, and that truthfully informs about the nutritional composition of foods, in particular with regard to the content, quality and availability of the proteins contained;
Amendment 700 #
2023/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 – point xiii
Paragraph 32 – point xiii
xiii. A clear research and development funding strategy to promote and stimulate the market uptake of plant-basedall types of alternative proteins for food and feed in the EU;
Amendment 49 #
2023/0378(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)Regulation (EU) 2016/2031
Article 94 – paragraph 1
(12 a) in Article 94, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: 1. By way of derogation from Article 87, where a plant, plant product or other object, introduced into the Union territory from a third country which, for movement within the Union territory, requires a plant passport pursuant to Article 79(1) and Article 80(1), the passport shall be issued if the checks by means of official controls concerning its introduction have been completed satisfactorily and have led to the conclusion that the plant, plant product or other object concerned fulfils the substantive requirements for issuance of a plant passport according to Article 85 and, where appropriate, Article 86. The plant passport shall be issued no later than when the plant, plant product or other object concerned is moved for the first time by the importer within the Union to another operator. The importer of the plant, plant product or other object concerned shall be able to provide on request of the competent authority the result of the relevant official control using the Information Management System for Official Controls (IMSOC/TRACES) by the time the plant passport is issued.
Amendment 56 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) This Directive lays down rules to ensure a common application of the arm’s length principle across the Union with the aim of increasing tax certainty and, reducing occurrences of double taxation as well as double non taxation, reducing tax compliance costs especially for taxpayers that operate cross-border within the Union and avoiding tax abuse.
Amendment 64 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) To ensure the mitigation of double taxation, Member States should have adequate mechanisms in place to enable them, when a primary adjustment is made in another Member State or third country jurisdiction, to make a corresponding adjustment. In particular, Member States should have the possibility to perform corresponding adjustments and should not limit the granting of such an adjustment in the context of mutual agreement procedures (MAPs) but also as a result of: (i) a “fast-track” procedure to be concluded in 180 days without the need to open a MAP when there is no doubt that the primary adjustment is well founded; or (ii) joint audits or other forms of international cooperation such as multilateral risk assessment programs like the European Trust and Cooperation Approach (ETACA) and the International Compliance Assurance Programme (ICAP). To this aim, Member States should use all the procedures and arrangements provided by the Directive on administrative cooperation (DAC), especially DAC 3 and 6 that cover the exchange of information related to Advance Price Agreements and the exchange of information on reportable cross-border arrangements which have been reported by intermediaries or by the relevant taxpayer.
Amendment 93 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) In order to evaluate the effectiveness and the impact of the new rules set out in this Directive, especially its articulation with the latest OECD guidelines, the Commission should prepare an evaluation on the basis of the information provided by Member States and other available data., and if appropriate, accompanied by a legislative proposal
Amendment 103 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘arm’s length principle’ means the international standard pursuant to Article 9 of the OECD Model Tax Convention that prescribes that associated enterprises must transact with each other as if they were independent third parties. In other words, the transactions between two associated enterprises should reflect the outcome that would have been achieved if the parties were not related i.e. if the parties were independent of each other and the outcome (price or margins) was determined by (open) market forces.
Amendment 106 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘permanent establishment’ means a fixed place of business, as defined under the relevant bilateral convention on the avoidance of double taxation or, in absence thereof, in national law in line with Article 5 of the OECD Model Tax Convention;
Amendment 114 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, where an enterprise engages in one or more commercial or financial cross-border transacrelations with an associated enterprise, such enterprise determines the amount of its taxable profits in a manner that is consistent with the arm’s length principle.
Amendment 131 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) Member States shall declare the request admissible within 340 days by virtue of a notification to the taxpayer if all the information provided in paragraph 3, point (a), has been submitted. In the same timeframe, Member States shall notify the taxpayer of the lack of any necessary information and grant at least 340 days to provide it. If the taxpayer does not provide the requested information within the assigned deadline, the request may be rejected as inadmissible.
Amendment 135 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) Member States shall ensure that when the double taxation arises from a primary adjustment made in another Member State, the procedure is concluded within 18200 days from the receipt of the taxpayer’s request with a reasoned act of acceptance or rejection.
Amendment 137 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. For the purpose of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Member States should use all the available procedures and arrangements provided by the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC).
Amendment 153 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) none of the differences (if any) between the transactions being compared or between the enterprises undertaking those transactions could materially affect the price or margin in the open market;
Amendment 186 #
2023/0322(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. TEvery 5 years, the Commission shall examine and evaluate the application of this Directive every 5 years and submit a report on its evaluation to the European Parliament and to the Council, the impact as well as the interplay of this Directive with the latest OECD guidelines and submit a report on its evaluation to the European Parliament and to the Council, and if appropriate, accompanied by a legislative proposal from the European Commission. The first report shall be submitted by 31 December 2031.
Amendment 84 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Albeit different in their design, the fundamental features of corporate income tax systems are similar as they lay down rules aiming towards the same objective, i.e., to arrive at a taxable base for businesses. In this vein, to support the proper functioning of the internal market, the corporate tax environment in the Union should be shaped in accordance with the principle that companies pay their fair share of tax in the jurisdiction(s) where their profits are generated. Therefore, it would be important for businesses which operate on the internal market that Member States introduce a common legal framework to harmonise the fundamental features of corporate income tax systems with a view to simplifying tax rules and ensuring a fair competition.
Amendment 121 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) To achieve the key objective of creating a simplified corporate tax framework, the preliminary tax results for each group member should be aggregated into one single common tax base, in order to subsequently allocate this base to eligible group members. The tax adjustments to the financial statements would produce preliminary tax results for each group member. These results would then be aggregated, which would allow for cross-border loss relief between BEFIT group members, and subsequently, the aggregated tax base would be allocated to group members based on a transition allocation rule until Pillar One of the OECD agreement on corporate taxation enters into force in all Member States; this wshould pave the way towards a permanent mechanism. That permanent mechanism could be bas in accordance with profit allocation rules defined oin a formulary apportionmentthe OECD Pillar One Multilateral Convention and would render the need for intra-BEFIT group transactions to be consistent with the arm’s length principle redundant. It wshould have the advantage of usinguse morest recent country-by-country reporting (‘CbCR’) data and the information gathered during the transition period. This will also allow for a more thorough assessment of the impact that the implementation of theconsistent approach between BEFIT and the OECD two- pillar approach is expected to have on national tax bases and the BEFIT group tax basand therefore reduce tax compliance costs for companies. In this way, it would still become possible to materialise the key objective of tax neutrality in the internal market, which would reduce instances of double and over-taxation and enhance tax certainty with the aim of reducing the number of tax disputes.
Amendment 146 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) To optimise the benefits of having a common legal framework for computing the corporate tax base in the internal market, the application of the rules should be optional for groups, including SME groups, who earn annual combined revenues of less than EUR 750 000 000 as long as they prepare consolidated financial statements and have a taxable presence in the Union. By keeping the application of the rules open to groups of a smaller size, more groups with cross-border structures and activities may benefit from the simplification that the common framework offers. Companies choosing to be covered by this Directive should easily benefit from Member States' and the European Commission's technical assistance to comply with the new rules and therefore foster their cross-border activities.
Amendment 157 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Directive appliesA Member State may decide to apply this Directive to companies resident for tax purposes in athat Member State, including their permanent establishments located in other Member States, and to permanent establishments located in Member States of entities resident for tax purposes in a third country (‘third-country entities’), which comply with the following criteria:
Amendment 192 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Amendment 273 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
For each fiscal year between 1 July 2028 and 30 June 2035 at the luntil the Multilateral Convention to implement amount A of Pillar One of the OECD agreement enters into force in all EU Member Statest (the ‘transition period’), the BEFIT tax base shall be allocated to the BEFIT group members in accordance with the baseline allocation percentage.
Amendment 291 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point 1 (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 – point 1 (new)
(1) Once the Multilateral Convention implementing amount A of Pillar One of the OECD agreement enters into force in all EU Member States, the BEFIT tax base should be allocated to the BEFIT group members in each tax year in accordance with the profit allocation rules defined in the Multilateral Convention on Pillar one.
Amendment 351 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 57 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 57 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. BEFIT teams should use all the existing procedures and arrangements offered by the Directive on Administration Cooperation (DAC) to ensure an efficient cooperation and exchange of information between national tax administrations.
Amendment 374 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 77 – paragraph 1
Article 77 – paragraph 1
1. Five years after this Directive starts to apply, the Commission shall examine and evaluate its functioning and report to the European Parliament and the Council to that effect. The report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal to amend this Directive and to propose its mandatory application for the Member States.
Amendment 376 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 77 – paragraph 2
Article 77 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission relevant information for the evaluation of the Directive in accordance with paragraph 3, including aggregated data on BEFIT group members which are resident for tax purposes in their jurisdiction and permanent establishments thereof operating in their jurisdiction, in order to properly assess - the impact of the transition allocation rule and of; - linkage with other legislative acts in the area of corporate taxation, namely Directive (EU) 2022/2523 as well as assessing the situation regarding Pillar One of the Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy agreed by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on 8 October 2021; - the impact on double tax treaties; - co-existence of two tax systems, at the national and EU level; - administrative burden for entrepreneurs and tax administrations resulting from application of Section 5 of Chapter II; - the impact of the allocation of the tax base on the Member States revenues.
Amendment 378 #
2023/0321(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 77 – paragraph 2
Article 77 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission relevant information for the evaluation of the Directive in accordance with paragraph 3, including aggregated data on BEFIT group members which are resident for tax purposes in their jurisdiction and permanent establishments thereof operating in their jurisdiction, in order to properly assess the impact of the transition allocation rule and of Directive (EU) 2022/2523 as well as assessing the situation regardingarticulation with Pillar One of the Statement on a Two- Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy agreed by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on 8 October 2021.
Amendment 66 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) they qualify as micro, small and medium-sized (SMEs), as defined in Directive 2013/34/EU16 ;. For the purpose of this directive and notwithtanding to the Directive 2013/34/EU, the micro- undertakings shall be defined as undertakings which do not have more than 25 employees as average number during the financial year, the small undertakings shall be defined as undertakings which do not have more than 100 employees as average number during the financial year, and the medium-sized undertakings shall be defined as undertakings which do not have more than 350 employees as average number during the financial year. _________________ 16 Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC
Amendment 69 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 16 to amend Annexes I to IV, in order to take account of changes to the laws of the Member States and based on the information provided by the relevant Member State concerning:
Amendment 76 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘taxable result of the permanent establishment’ means the taxable income or loss attributed to the permanent establishment and computed in accordance with the Head Office Taxation rules;
Amendment 79 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the joint turnover of its permanent establishments did not exceed, for the last two fiscal years, an amount equal to double the turnover generated by the head office; for the last year the joint turnover of its permanent establishments is calculated based on the date available until the 30th September of that year;
Amendment 80 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the joint turnover of its permanent establishments did not exceed, for the last two fiscal years, an amount equal to double the turnover generated by the head office in the head office Member State;
Amendment 82 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last two fiscal years; for newly created SMEs the minimum lenght of tax residency is not taken into account;
Amendment 83 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) it has been resident for tax purposes in the head office Member State during the last two fiscal years or, if more recently, since the establishment of the head office;
Amendment 86 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) it has met the conditions laid down in Article 2(1), point d) for the last two fiscal years or, if more recently, since the establishment of the head office.
Amendment 89 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. If the head office opts to apply the head office taxation rules in accordance with paragraph 1, it shall apply those rules to all its permanent establishments in other Member States. If it creates a new permanent establishment in another Member State, it shall apply head office taxation rules to such permanent establishment from the moment of its establishment. In that case the head office should inform the host Member State that it has opted to apply the head office taxation rules in accordance with paragraph 1;
Amendment 98 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The host Member State may challenge the decision of the filing authority regarding the fulfilment of the eligibility requirements in accordance with the provisions set out in Article 13. In that case, the national rules of the head office Member State are applied. Notwithstanding such proceedings, the SMEs may start applying the head office taxation rules.
Amendment 99 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
If the filing authority concludes that the eligibility requirements are not met, it shall inform the head office within two months of the notification referred to in paragraph 1 and the head office may appeal against it in accordance with the national law. The decision of the filing authority shall only have legal effects as of the following fiscal year.
Amendment 115 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) for the last two fiscal years, the joint turnover of its permanent establishments exceeded an amount which is equal to triple the turnover of the head office in the head office Member State.
Amendment 117 #
2023/0320(CNS)
(b a) the SMEs referred to in Article 2(1) set up one or more subsidiaries;
Amendment 118 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(b b) the undertaking does not anymore qualify as micro, small and medium-sized undertakings pursuant to Article 2(1)(b).
Amendment 126 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. If the head office wishes to renew its option, it shall notify the filing authority thereof at least sixthree months before the end of the period referred to in Article 7(1) and shall list the names of the host Member States. The filing authority shall verify whether the SME continues to meet the eligibility requirements set out in Article 4.
Amendment 127 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The filing authority shall confirm the renewal of the option within twoone months of the receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 1 after it has verified that the eligibility requirements set out in Article 4 are met. It shall communicate its decision to the head office, together with the information that the grounds for exclusion laid down in Article 10 do not apply. The filing authority shall also inform the tax authorities of the host Member States of the renewal within four months of the receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 140 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where one or more permanent establishment of the SME are not required to prepare separate financial accounting statements under the law of the host Member State, the HOTead Office Taxation tax return shall include the following information:
Amendment 153 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The filing authority shall collect the tax corresponding to the tax liability of each permanent establishment of the head office in the Union, apply the tax rate the respective host Member State and transfer the relevant amount to the competent authority of the respective host Member State without any delay.
Amendment 156 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Unless specified otherwise, the rules of this Directive shall not affect the national rules of Member States that govern local tax audits, legal remedies and proceedings, or the dispute resolution mechanisms available at the level of the Union or provided for in the applicable bilateral tax conventions on the avoidance of double taxation. The commercial, accounting and fiscal obligations of a permanent establishment pursuant to the national rules of the host Member State shall not be affected by this Directive.
Amendment 160 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The tax authority of the host Member State may request that an audit be carried out jointly with the filing authority covering the computation of the taxable result of the permanent establishment in accordance with the head office taxation rules, the attribution of profits to the permanent establishment and/or the applicable tax rate. Joint audits shall be conducted in accordance with Council Directive 2011/16/EU18 . Notwithstanding the provisions in the aforementioned Directive, the requested competent authority shall accept such request byThe request for a joint audit may be also raised by the tax authority of the head office Member State towards the tax authoritiesy of the host Member State of each permanent establishment. _________________ 18 Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC (OJ L 64, 11.3.2011, p. 1)
Amendment 167 #
2023/0320(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. Five years after this Directive starts to apply, the Commission shall examine and evaluate its functioning and report to the European Parliament and the Council to that effect. In the evaluation report, the Commission shall, among others., examine whether the head office taxation rules should be also applied to one or more subsidiaries of the SMEs. The report shall, where appropriate, be accompanied by a proposal to amend this Directive.
Amendment 38 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) It is necessary to ensure that national public bodies in charge of administrative data sources relevant for development, production and dissemination of European statistics allow national statistical authorities to access, reuse and integrate this data free of charge in time and with sufficient frequency for the purposes of developing, producing and transmitting statistics to the Commission (Eurostat)disseminating European statistics within the deadlines and in accordance with quality requirements defined in Union statistical legislation.
Amendment 41 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 3 – point 5 b
Article 3 – point 5 b
5b. ‘data access’ means processing by a national statistical institute or the Commission (Eurostat) of data that has been provided by a private data holder, in accordance with specific technical, legal or organisational requirements, without necessarily requiring the transmission or downloading of such data;
Amendment 42 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 3 – point 7 a (new)
Article 3 – point 7 a (new)
(ba) the following point is inserted: "7a. ‘privately held data’ means data held by private entities, the main aim of which is not the provision of statistics; "
Amendment 43 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 3 – point 8
Article 3 – point 8
8. ‘use for statistical purposes’ means the exclusive use for the development and, production and dissemination of statistical results and analyses, including for related research and scientific activities or the establishment of sampling frames;;
Amendment 49 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
3. When assessing the need for temporary statistical actions, the Commission (Eurostat) shall promptly inform and shall consult the ESS Committee and take into account its opinion and professional guidance.
Amendment 50 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 16 a – paragraph 4
Article 16 a – paragraph 4
4. The NSIs may decide, separately and on a voluntary basis, to participate in these temporary statistical actions, but shall, together with the Commission (Eurostat), ensure the relevance and sufficient coverage of those actions at Union level. When participating in temporary statistical actions, the NSIs shall comply with the common timespan, frequency and quality requirements for the national data to be provided to the Commission (Eurostat).
Amendment 51 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 16 a – paragraph 5
Article 16 a – paragraph 5
Amendment 52 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 16 a – paragraph 6
Article 16 a – paragraph 6
Amendment 54 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 17 a – paragraph 1
Article 17 a – paragraph 1
1. National public bodies in charge of administrative data sources relevant for development, production and dissemination of European statistics shall allow the NSIs and other national authorities (hereafter ‘ONA’) referred to in Article 4, to access, reuse and integrate, free of charge, this data and the relevant metadata, in timely manner and with sufficient frequency for the purpose of development, producingtion and transmitting statistics to the Commission (Eurostat)dissemination of European statistics within the deadlines and in accordance with quality requirements laid down in Union statistical legislation.;
Amendment 55 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 17 b – paragraph 1
Article 17 b – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to reporting obligations laid down in sectoral statistical legislation of the Union, national legislation nor to the obligation for data holders to make data available based on exceptional need in accordance with the Data Act, an NSI or the Commission (Eurostat) may request a private data holder to make data and the relevant metadata available for the development and production of European statistics if the annual work programme has established the following conditions:
Amendment 61 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 17 c – paragraph 5
Article 17 c – paragraph 5
5. Without prejudice to reporting obligations laid down in sectoral statistical legislation of the Union or national legislation, a data holder shall make the relevant data available to the NSI or the Commission (Eurostat) within the period specified in the decision pursuant to paragraph 1 and 4 of this Article.
Amendment 62 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 17 c – paragraph 6
Article 17 c – paragraph 6
6. The Member States and the Commission shallmay take appropriate measures to ensure the effective enforcement of the decisions adopted in accordance with paragraph 4. Those measures may include the adoption of fines where the private data holder intentionally or negligently fails to supply the data requested by decision within the set period or supplies incorrect, incomplete or misleading data. In fixing the amount of the fines, the Member State and the Commission shall have regard to the nature, gravity, duration and recurrence of the infringement.
Amendment 63 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 17 e – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 17 e – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The NSIs and the Commission (Eurostat) shall use data made available in accordance with Article 17b for the development and, production and dissemination of European statistics:
Amendment 69 #
2023/0237(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009
Article 17 f – paragraph 1
Article 17 f – paragraph 1
1. DNon-confidential data shall be shared between NSIs and between NSIs and the Commission (Eurostat) exclusively for statistical purposes and for improving the quality of European statistics.
Amendment 280 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Member States shall inform the Commission on designate oned competent authorityies for each soil districts established in accordance with Article 4.
Amendment 294 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shallmay, subject to agreement from Member States concerned followed by negotiations to determine appropriate location, carry out regular soil measurements on soil samples taken in- situ, based on the relevant descriptors and methodologies referred to in Articles 7 and 8, to support Member States’ monitoring of soil health. Where a Member State provides agreement in accordance with this paragraph, it shall ensure that the Commission can carry out such in-situ soil sampling in the cooperation with the land owners and land managers.
Amendment 299 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. The Commission and the EEA shall, on the basis of existing data and within two years of the entry into force of this Directive, establish a digital soil health data portal that shall provide access in anonymized georeferenced spatial format to at leastwithout disclosing the identity of the owner of the site, on the available soil health data resulting from:
Amendment 327 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States may apply other equivalent methodologies than the ones listed in the first subparagraph, points (a) and (b), provided that validated transfer functions are available, as required in Annex II, part B, fourth column.
Amendment 415 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) defining sustainable soil management practices respecting the indicative list of sustainable soil management principles listed in Annex III to be gradually implemented on all managed soils and based on the local needs, on the basis of the outcome of the soil assessments carried out in accordance with Article 9, regeneration practices to be gradually implemented on the unhealthy soils in the Member States;
Amendment 422 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) defining soil management practices and other practices affecting negativesignificantly the soil health negatively to be avoided by soil managers, taking account the difference on different soil types.
Amendment 472 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) avoid or reduce as much as technically and economically possible the loss of the capacity of the soil to provide multiple ecosystem services, including food production, by:
Amendment 476 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) reducing the area affected by the land take to the extentas much as possible and
Amendment 481 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) selecting areas where the loss of ecosystem services would be minimizedal and
Amendment 487 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new)
(iiia) performing the land take in a way that minimizes the negative impact on soil management by soil managers and
Amendment 491 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) avoid land take and soil sealing as much as possible and preferably use land with sealed soil;
Amendment 492 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(ab) preferring time-limited land take and performing land rehabilitation upon the termination of the land take so that the soil would regain its capacity to provide ecosystem services;
Amendment 610 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23
Article 23
Amendment 632 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
For the purposes of this Annex, the following definitions shall apply Since I was not able to amend specific part I will just make note here: Part A: soil descriptors with criteria for healthy soil condition established at Union level should be in Part B: soil descriptors with criteria for healthy soil condition established at Member States level.
Amendment 659 #
2023/0232(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex III – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The following principles shallmay apply:
Amendment 98 #
2023/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16
(16) ‘unit of notification’ means the entire area of basic material for the production of FRM intended for the purpose of the conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources that has been notified to the competent authorities´own reproductive material´ means the forest owner may use reproductive material derived from forest stands owned by him for artificial forest restoration and afforestation;
Amendment 231 #
Amendment 258 #
2023/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18
Article 18
Amendment 262 #
2023/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19
Article 19
Amendment 141 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
The delegated act referred to in the first subparagraph shall add genera or species to the list in Annex I if they fulfil at least twoone of the following elements:
Amendment 148 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The delegated act referred to in the first subparagraph shall remove genera or species from the list in Annex I if they no longer fulfil at least twoone of the elements set out in the second subparagraph.
Amendment 153 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) PRM for which plant variety rights have not been granted sold or transferred in any way, whether free of charge or not, between final users for their own private use and outside their commercial activities and outside the scope of ensuring their production activities;
Amendment 201 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) import;
Amendment 202 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e b (new)
(e b) breeding of varieties;
Amendment 208 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘marketing’ means the following actions conducted by a professional operator for commercial use: sale, holding, transfer for free, or offering for sale or any other way of transferring or distribution within, or import into, the Union,
Amendment 222 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 17
(17) ‘standard seed’ means seed, other than pre-basic, basic or certified seed, that is not intended for further multiplication, andhas been produced from pre-basic, basic, certified or standard seed, that that satisfies the respective conditions laid down in Part A of Annex III;
Amendment 233 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 21
(21) ‘standard material’ means PRM other than seed, and other than pre-basic, basic or certified material, that is not intended for further multiplication, andhas been produced from pre- basic, basic, certified or standard material, that satisfies the respective conditions laid down in Part B of Annex III;
Amendment 237 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 27 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 27 – introductory part
(27) ‘organic heterogeneous material’ means a plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank which:organic heterogeneous material as defined in Article 3(18) of Regulation (EU) 2018/848, produced in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/848; intended only for further use in organic production;
Amendment 260 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 31
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 31
(31) ‘practically free from pests’ means completely free from pests, or a situation where the presence of quality pests on the respective PRM is so low that those pests do not affect adversely the qualitythat the extent to which pests are present on the PRM is sufficiently low to ensure acceptable quality and usefulness of thate PRM;
Amendment 265 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 34
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 34
(34) ‘off-type’ means, in relation with seed or other plants, a seed or other PRM of the crop species not corresponding to the description of the variety or species to which it is supposed to belong pursuant to this Regulation
Amendment 267 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 35
(35) ‘hybrid variety’ means a variety produced as a result from the crossbreeding of two or more othercomponents, namely inbred lines, single cross hybrids, double cross hybrids, top cross hybrids or individual varieties.
Amendment 284 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) as organic heterogeneous material in accordance with Article 27.
Amendment 289 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) marketing of PRM of organic heterogeneous material in accordance with Article 27;
Amendment 297 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) sowprevious cropping and pisolanting, and production in the fieldon distances, of pre-basic, basic and certified seed;
Amendment 298 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 300 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission may adopt implementing acts specifying the production and marketing requirements referred to in Part A and Part Bto E of Annex II for certain genera, species or categories of PRM, and, where appropriate, for certain grades, classes, generations or other sub-divisions of the category concerned. Those requirements shall concern one or more of the following elements
Amendment 302 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) conditprevionus for sowing or planting;cropping and isolation distances
Amendment 303 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Amendment 304 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Amendment 307 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point g
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point g
(g) internationally recognised certification methods of PRM, certification methods of PRM, including the application of bio-molecular or other technical methods, as well as their approval and use, and the listing of approved methods in the Union;
Amendment 314 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Amendment 315 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) requirements for sowprevious cropping and pisolanting, and production in the fieldon distances, of standard seeds;
Amendment 316 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point b
Amendment 323 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission may adopt implementing acts specifying the production and marketing requirements referred to in Part A and Part Bto E of Annex III for certain genera or species of standard seed or material. Those requirements shall concern one or more of the following elements:
Amendment 325 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) conditprevionus for sowing or plantingcropping and isolation distances;
Amendment 326 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Amendment 327 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Amendment 328 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point g
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point g
(g) the application of internationally recognised bio-molecular or other technical methods, as well as their approval and use, and the listing of approved methods in the Union;
Amendment 341 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A professional operator may, upon application, be authorised by the competent authority to perform all or certain activities required for certification of PRM under official supervision of the competent authority for pre-basic, basic and certified material or seeds, and to issueprint an official label for them.
Amendment 342 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) employ qualified personnel for carrying out the sampling referred to in Annex II, or conclude contracts with companiesother professional operators, involved in the production of PRM employing qualified personnel for those activities;
Amendment 344 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) employ specialised personnel and equipment to carry out the testing referred to in Annex II, or use seed testing laboratories employing qualified personnel for those activities;
Amendment 359 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. PRM shall be marketed in lots. The content of the varieties and species of each lot shall be sufficiently homogeneous regarding and identifiable by its users as distinctcertified in sufficiently homogeneous lots. Each lot shall be distinguishable from all other lots of PRMby at least a lot reference number.
Amendment 363 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
During processing, packaging, storage, or at delivery, lots of PRM may be merged into a new lot only if they belong to the same variety and harvest year.
Amendment 364 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where lots consisting of different certification categories are merged, the new lot shall belong to the category of the component of the lowest category. The merging operation may only be undertaken in a facility and by persons authorised by the competent authority for this specific purposeEach lot resulting from merging operation shall undergo a new certification procedure and the professional operator shall notify the competent authority of the identity and quantity of the PRM used for merging.
Amendment 367 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, seeds potatoes with completed certification procedure , may be marketed from a professional operator directly to a farmer in bulk.
Amendment 370 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
That professional operator shall be authorized for that purpose by the competent authority. It shall inform the competent authority in advance of such activity and of the lot from which such seed potatoes comes.
Amendment 371 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Where seed ispotatoes are loaded directly into the farmer’s machinery or trailer, the professional operator and the farmer concerned shall ensure traceability of that seed potatoes by issuing and retaining documents indicating the species and variety, quantity, the time of transfer and lot identification.
Amendment 375 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the competent authority, if so requested by the professional operator, or if the professional operator is not authorised to carry out certificationprint official labels under official supervision, by the competent authority in accordance with Article 10; or
Amendment 376 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) the professional operator, under the official supervision of the competent authority, where the professional operator is authorised to carry out certification underprint official labels official supervision in accordance with Article 10.
Amendment 377 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) the third party acting under the responsibility of the professional operator according to (b).
Amendment 381 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
The operator’s label shall be issued, printed and affixed by the professional operator, or by a person acting under the responsibility of the professional opeartor, on the outside of a plant bundle, package or container.
Amendment 383 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. The official label and the operator’s label shall be legible, indelible, not modifiable if tampered with, printed on one side, made of untearable material unless it is an adhesive label, not having been used previously, and easily visible.
Amendment 393 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point n a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point n a (new)
(n a) The label for PRM of organic heterogeneous material referred to in Article 27.
Amendment 394 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Amendment 402 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Mixtures of certified seed or mixtures of standard seed of various genera or species listed in Part A of Annex I and complying with the requirements of Articles 5 to 8, as well as of different varieties of those genera or speciestogether with seed of genera or species not listed in that Annex as well as of different varieties of those genera or species and mixtures of different varieties of standard seed of vegetables listed in Part B of Annex I , may be produced and marketed in the Union, if they fullfill the requirements of this Article.
Amendment 407 #
2023/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) an operator’s label, in the case where the mixture consists only of standard seed, or of certified and standard seed all other cases.
Amendment 273 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Amendment 276 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) Plant varieties that may arise and occur naturally or may be produced by conventional breeding or are considered to be conventional plants (such NGT plants) shall not be subject to Patent legislation but to Plant Variety Rights legislation, which allows the use of the so- called Plant breeders ‘exemption and Farm saved Seeds exemption‘.
Amendment 282 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 303 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – title
Article 6 – title
Verification procedure of category 1 NGT plant status prior to the deliberate release for any other purpose than placing on the market(merged Articles 6 and 7)
Amendment 309 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. If the verification request is not deemed inadmissible in accordance with paragraph 5, the competent authority shall verify whether the NGT plant fulfils the criteria set out in Annex I and prepare a verification report within 30 working days from the date of receipt of a verification request. The competent authority shall make available the verification reportasks the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) for scientific opinion on the verification report and shall make it available to the other Member States and to the Commission without undue delay.
Amendment 317 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Article 6 – paragraph 7
7. The other Member States and the Commission may make commentsreasoned comments together with a scientific justification as regards the fulfilment of the criteria set out in Annex 1, to the verification report within 20 days from the date of receipt of that report.
Amendment 318 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Article 6 – paragraph 7
7. The other Member States and the Commission may make scientifically justified comments to the verification report, with regard to the compliance with criteria set out in Annex I, within 20 days from the date of receipt of that report.
Amendment 327 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 8
Article 6 – paragraph 8
Amendment 339 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 9
Article 6 – paragraph 9
Amendment 353 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 10
Article 6 – paragraph 10
10. The Ccommission, after having consulted the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’), shall prepare a draft decision declaring whether the NGT plant is a category 1 NGT plantpetent authority shall adopt its decision based on the EFSA´s opinion within 4520 working days from the date of receipt of the comment(s), taking the latter iEFSA´s opinion. The competento account. The decision shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 28(2)uthority shall transmit the decision without undue delay to the requester, the other Member States and to the Commission.
Amendment 363 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 10
Article 6 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission, after having consulted the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’), shall prepare a draft decision declaring whether the NGT plant is a category 1 NGT plant within 4520 working days from the date of receipt of the comment(s), taking the latter into account. The decision shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 28(2).
Amendment 491 #
2023/0226(COD)
5 a. No later than 2026, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the role and impact of patents on breeders' and farmers' access to varied plant reproductive material, as well as on innovation and particularly on the opportunities for SME. Where appropriate to ensure breeders' and farmers' access to plant reproductive material, seed diversity and affordable prices, as well as the ongoing promotion of innovation, particularly with a view to opportunities for SME, the report shall be accompanied by a roadmap to address necessary adjustments in the intellectial property framework.
Amendment 504 #
2023/0226(COD)
A NGT plant prepared by new genomic techniques is considered equivalent to a conventional plants when if it differs from the recipient/parental plant by no more than 20only by genetic modifications of the types referred to in points 1 to 5, in any DNA sequence sharing sequence similarity with the targeted site that can be predicted by bioinformatic tools4 which can be combined with each other.
Amendment 510 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
(1) Criteria specific for the use of targeted mutagenesis on the condition that the number of modifications per any gene cannot exceed 3:
Amendment 511 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 (new)
(2) Criteria specific for the use of cisgenesis on the condition that only one modification can occur per one genome site:
Amendment 528 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – introductory part
Annex I – point 3 – introductory part
(3) on the condition that the genetic modification does not interrupt an endogenous gene or that the resulting DNA sequences context in the recipient plant already occurs in a species from the breeders’ gene pool:
Amendment 536 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point a
Annex I – point 3 – point a
(a) targeted insertion of a contiguous DNA sequence existing in the breeder’s gene pool;
Amendment 542 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point b
Annex I – point 3 – point b
(b) targeted substitution of an endogenous DNA sequence with a contiguous DNA sequence existing in the breeder’s gene pool;
Amendment 544 #
2023/0226(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point b – point i (new)
Annex I – point 3 – point b – point i (new)
i) translocation of a continuous endogenous DNA sequence existing in the breeders’ gene pool;
Amendment 551 #
2023/0226(COD)
Amendment 314 #
2023/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) natural and legal persons of the Union who: (i) reside or are established in a Member State whose currency is not the euro, and (ii) exercise their free movement rights in a Member State whose currency is the euro.
Amendment 156 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) A responsible data economy, which is driven by the generation and use of data, is an integral part of the Union internal market that can bring benefits to both Union citizens and the economy. Digital technologies relying on data are increasingly driving change in financial markets by innovating, producing new business models, products and ways for firms to engage with customers.
Amendment 162 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Ensuring customer control and trust is imperative to build a well-functioning and effective data sharing framework in the financial sector. Ensuring effective customers’ control over data sharing contributes to innovation as well as customer confidence and trust in data sharing. As a result, effective control may helps overcome customer reluctance to share their data. Under the current Union framework, the data portability right of a data subject in accordance with the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 is limited to personal data and can be relied upon only where it is technically feasible to port the data. Customer data and technical interfaces in the financial sector beyond payment accounts are not standardised, rendering data sharing more costly for businesses. Further, the financial institutions are only legally obliged to make the payment data of their customers available. _________________ 9 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 166 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) A dedicated and harmonised framework for access to financial data is therefore necessarydesireable at Union level to respond to the needs of the digital economy and to remove barriers to a well- functioning internal market for data. Specific rules are required to address these barriers to promote better access to customer data and hence make it possible for consumers and firms to realise the gains stemming from better financial products and services. Data-driven finance wcould facilitate industry transition from the traditional supply of standardised products to tailored solutions that are better suited to the customers’ specific needs, including improved customer facing interfaces that enhance competition, improve user experience and ensure financial services that are focused on the customer as the end user.
Amendment 174 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The sharing of the customer data in the scope of this Regulation should be based on the permission of the customer. The legal obligation on data holders to share customer data should be triggered once the customer has requested their data to be shared with a data user. This request can be submitted by a data user acting on behalf of the customer where permission has explicitly been granted. Where the processing of personal data is involved, a data user should have a valid lawful basis for processing under Regulation (EU) 2016/679. The customers data can be processed for the agreed purposes in the context of the service provided. The processing of personal data must respect the principles of personal data protection, including lawfulness, fairness and transparency, purpose limitation and data minimisation. A customer has the right to withdraw the permission given to a data user at any time. When data processing is necessary for the performance of a contract, a customer should be able to withdraw permissions according to the contractual obligations to which the data subject is party. When personal data processing is based on consent, a data subject has the right to withdraw his or her consent at any time, as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 182 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) The customer data included in the scope of this Regulation should include sustainability-related information, where applicable, that should enable customers to more easily access financial services that are aligned with their sustainability preferences and sustainable finance needs, in line with the Commission’s strategy for financing the transition to a sustainable economy12 . Access to data relating to sustainability which may be contained in balance or transaction details related to a mortgage, credit, loan and savings account, as well as access to customer data relating to sustainability held by investment firms, can contribute to facilitating access to data needed to access sustainable finance or make investments into the green transition. Moreover, customer data in the scope of this Regulation should include data which forms part of a creditworthiness assessment related to firms, including small and medium sized enterprises, and which can provide greater insight into the sustainability objectives of small firms. The inclusion of data used for the creditworthiness assessment related to firms should improve access to financing and streamline the application for loans. Such data should be limited to data on firms and should not infringe intellectual property rights. _________________ 12 Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic And Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy, COM/2021/390 final
Amendment 195 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The permission dashboard should display the permissions given by a customer, including when personal data are shared based on consent or are necessary for the performance of a contract. The permission dashboard should warn a customer in a standard way of the risk of possible contractual consequences of the withdrawal of a permission, but the customer should remain responsible for managing such risk. The permission dashboard should be used to manage existing permissions. Data holders should inform data users in real-due time of any withdrawal of a permission. The permission dashboard should include a record of permissions that have been withdrawn or have expired for a period of up to two years to allow the customer to keep track of their permissions in an informed and impartial manner. Data users should inform data holders in real-time of new and re-established permissions granted by customers, including the duration of validity of the permission and a short summary of the purpose of the permission. The information provided on the permission dashboard is without prejudice to the information requirements under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 206 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
Amendment 258 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) payment institutions, including account information service providers and payment institutions exempted pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/2366;
Amendment 260 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) electronic money institutions, including electronic money institutions exempted pursuant to Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council35 ; _________________ 35 Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (OJ L 267, 10.10.2009, p. 7).;
Amendment 277 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. This regulation shall not apply to SMEs, but there shall be an option for SMEs to opt-in to the provisions of the regulation;
Amendment 341 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 29 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 29 a (new)
(29 a) 'Small and Medium sized Enterprises' or SMEs, means an SME as defined in point (13) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU;
Amendment 346 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The data holder shall, upon request from a customer submitted by electronic means, make the data listed in Article 2(1) available to the customer without undue delay, free of charge, continuously and in real-due time.
Amendment 446 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Within 1836 months from the entry into force of this Regulation, data holders and data users shall become members of a financial data sharing scheme governing access to the customer data in compliance with Article 10.
Amendment 502 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 515 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) a business plan including. where applicable, a forecast budget calculation for the first 3 financial years which demonstrates that the applicant is able to employ the appropriate and proportionate systems, resources and procedures to operate soundly;
Amendment 561 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Amendment 562 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Amendment 565 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 6
Article 30 – paragraph 6
Amendment 583 #
2023/0205(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
Article 36 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from [OP please insert the date = 242 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. However, Articles 9 to 13 shall apply from [OP please insert the date = 1836 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 29 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) To ensure that all EU taxpayers have access to a common, appropriate and effective proof of their residence for tax purposes, Member States should use automated procedures for the issuance of tax residence certificates in the same recognisable and acceptable digital form and with the same content. To allow for greater efficiency, the certificate should be valid at least for the whole year during which it has been issued and recognised by other Member States for that period. The eTRC should also contain a reference to applicable double taxation agreements. Member States can rescind an eTRC issued where the tax administration has proof to the contrary of the tax residence for that year. In order to allow for an efficient identification of EU companies, the certificate should include information on the European Unique Identifier (EUID).
Amendment 32 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) As the financial intermediaries most often engaged in the securities’ payment chains are large institutions as defined in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)29 as well as central securities depositories providing withholding tax agent services, these entities should be obliged to request registration on the national registers of Member States established as above. Other financial intermediaries should be allowed to request registration at their discretion. Registration should be requested by the financial intermediary itself by submitting an application to the competent authority designated by the Member State, including evidence that the financial intermediary meets certain requirements. The purpose of the requirements is to verify that the requesting intermediary meets the requirements of relevant EU regulation and supervised for compliance therewith. Where the financial intermediary is established outside the EU, it is required to be subject to legislation in the third country of its residence that is comparable for the purposes of this Directive and the third country of residence is neither on Annex I of the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions nor on the EU list of high-risk third countries (anti-money laundering list). Compliance of a third country financial intermediary with the relevant EU requirements relates solely for the purposes set out in this Directive and has no impact on the exercising or application of any other rights and obligations under other EU legislation. Once registered, financial intermediaries should be considered “certified financial intermediaries” in the respective Member State and be subject to the relevant reporting and notification obligations under this Directive while granted the right to request application of the relief procedures set out in this Directive. The Member States that maintain a national register should also take action to remove therefrom any certified financial intermediary that so requests or no longer meets the respective requirements. Furthermore, these Member States can decide to provide for the removal from their national register of certified financial intermediaries or to deny them access to relief system if they are found to have violated their obligations a number of times. Where a Member State takes such action of removal or denial, it should inform other Member States that maintain a national register accordingly in order to allow them to assess the removal of the same certified financial intermediary from their own national register. National legislation of the Member States concerned applies to the rights and obligations of parties concerned, including for appeal, in relation to any decision taken by a Member State in connection with registration and removal from their national register. _________________ 29 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 Text with EEA relevance (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1–337)
Amendment 35 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to render the Capital Markets Union more effective and competitive, procedures for relief of excess withholding taxes on securities’ income should be facilitated and accelerated, where adequate information has been provided by relevant certified financial intermediaries, including on the identity of the investor. The relevant certified financial intermediaries consist of all the certified financial intermediaries in the payment chain between the investor and the issuer of the securities, which might be required to also provide information on payments effected by non-certified financial intermediaries in the chain, as per the policy choice of each Member State. Taking into account the different approaches in Member States, two types of procedures are envisaged: (i) relief at source by direct application of the appropriate tax rate at the time of withholding and (ii) quick refund within a maximum of 50 days of the date of payment of the dividend or, as the case may be, of the date when the bond issuer must pay interest to the bond holder (coupon date)defined deadline. Member States should be free to introduce any of the two or a combination of both procedures, as they deem appropriate while ensuring that at least one is available for all investors, where the requirements of this Directive have been met. To ensure the proper and timely implementation of these procedures by the Member States concerned, it is appropriate to apply interest on late refunds of excess withholding taxes that are covered by this Directive and meet the conditions to benefit from these procedures assuming that the Member States responsible for issuing refunds already includes provisions for paying interest on late refunds in their domestic legislation. Where relevant requirements are not met, or the investor concerned so desires, Member States should apply their existing standard refund procedures to relieve excess withholding taxes. In any case, registered owners, in particular retail investors, and their authorized representatives, should preserve the right to reclaim excess withholding tax paid in a Member State where they provide proof of meeting the conditions set out in national law.
Amendment 37 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to render the Capital Markets Union more effective and competitive, procedures for relief of excess withholding taxes on securities’ income should be facilitated and accelerated, where adequate information has been provided by relevant certified financial intermediaries, including on the identity of the investor. The relevant certified financial intermediaries consist of all the certified financial intermediaries in the payment chain between the investor and the issuer of the securities, which might be required to also provide information on payments effected by non-certified financial intermediaries in the chain, as per the policy choice of each Member State. Taking into account the different approaches in Member States, two types of procedures are envisaged: (i) relief at source by direct application of the appropriate tax rate at the time of withholding and (ii) quick refund within a maximum of 50 days of the date of payment of the dividend or, as the case may be, of the date when the bond issuer must pay interest to the bond holder (coupon date). Member States should be free to introduce any of the two or a combination of both procedures, as they deem appropriate while ensuring that at least one is available for all investors, where the requirements of this Directive have been met. To ensure the proper and timely implementation of these procedures by the Member States concerned, it is appropriate to apply interest on late refunds of excess withholding taxes that are covered by this Directive and meet the conditions to benefit from these procedures. Where relevant requirements are not met, or the investor concerned so desires, Member States should apply their existing standard refund procedures to relieve excess withholding taxes. In any case, registered owners, in particular retail investors, and their authorized representatives, should preserve the right to reclaim excess withholding tax paid in a Member State where they provide proof of meeting the conditions set out in national law. Member States may reject a refund request when any verification procedure or tax audit is initiated.
Amendment 40 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to safeguard the systems for relief of excess withholding taxes, Member States maintaining a national register should also require certified financial intermediaries to verify the eligibility of investors that wish to claim a relief. In particular, certified financial intermediaries should collect the tax residence certificate of the relevant investor, and a declaration that such investor is the beneficial owner of the payment according to the legislation of the source Member State. They should also verify the applicable withholding tax rate based on the investor’s specific circumstances and indicate if they are aware of any financial arrangement involving the underlying securities that has not been settled, expired or otherwise terminated at the ex-dividend date. The due diligence requirements could be applied on an annual basis. Certified financial intermediaries should be held liable for tax revenue losses that have been incurred due to the inadequate fulfilment of these obligations, to the extent that national law of the Member State where the loss incurred so provides. In order to ensure proportionality of the burden and liability imposed on certified financial intermediaries, reduced verification obligations should apply to all relief procedures, where the risk of abuse is low and in particular where the total amount of the dividend paid to the investor for a shareholding in a company is lower than EUR 1000. Should such abuse be proven otherwise, Member States can however apply consequences under national law, including denying the systems of relief provided in this Directive, but they cannot hold certified financial intermediaries liable for absence of verification.
Amendment 42 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The proper implementation and enforcement of the proposed rules in each Member State concerned is critical for the promotion of the CMU as a whole as well as for the protection of the tax base of Member States and should therefore be monitored by the Commission. Member States should therefore communicate to the Commission on a regular basis, statistical information as specified by means of implementing act, on the implementation and enforcement in their territory of national measures adopted pursuant to this Directive. The Commission should prepare an evaluation on the basis of the information provided by Member States and other available data to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed new rules. In this context the Commission should consider the need to update the rules introduced by virtue of this Directive.
Amendment 49 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Amendment 51 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19
(19) ‘double tax treaty’ means an agreement or convention that provides for the elimination of double taxation of income, and where applicable, capital, in force between two (or more) countriejurisdictions.
Amendment 52 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall issue the eTRC based on the available information within oneseven working day from submission of a request, subject to paragraph 4. The eTRC shall comply with the technical requirements of Annex I and shall include the following information:
Amendment 53 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the first and last name of the taxpayer and the date and place of birth, if the taxpayer is an individual, or its name and its European Unique Identifier number (EUID), if the taxpayer is an entity, where available
Amendment 55 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(f a) the double tax treaty
Amendment 58 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. If more than oneseven working day is required to verify the tax residency of a specific taxpayer, the Member State shall inform the person requesting the certificate of the additional time needed and the reasons for the delay.
Amendment 61 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall recognise an eTRC issued by another Member State as adequate proof of residence of a taxpayer in that other Member State in accordance with paragraph 3. In any case, Member States may prove the residence for tax purposes in their jurisdictions.
Amendment 66 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States that levy a withholding tax on dividends from publicly traded shares paid to registered owners resident for tax purposes outside that Member State and that provide relief of excess withholding tax shallmay establish a national register of certified financial intermediaries. Member States may opt to use this national register also in relation to relief of excess withholding tax on interest from publicly traded bonds, if applicable.
Amendment 78 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall inform all other Member States about rejections of registration as soon as possible, according to Council Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation.
Amendment 80 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The Member State that removes a certified financial intermediary from its national register shall inform, according to Council Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, without delay all other Member States that maintain a national register according to Article 5.
Amendment 84 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to require certified financial intermediaries in their national register to report to the competent authority the information referred to in Annex II as soon as possiblewithin a maximum of 20 calendar days after the record date, unless a settlement instruction in respect of any part of a transaction is pending on the record date, in which case the reporting for that transaction shall take place as soon as possible after the settlement. If 20 days after the record date, settlement is still pending for any part of the transaction, certified financial intermediaries shall report within the next 5 calendar days indicating the part for which settlement is pending.
Amendment 89 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 5
Article 9 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall require certified financial intermediaries in their national register to keep the documentation supporting the information reported for fiveeight years and to provide access to any other information, as well as access to their premises for the purpose of audit and shall require certified financial intermediaries to delete or anonymise any personal data included in such documentation as soon as the audit has been completed and at the latest fiveeight years after reporting.
Amendment 94 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States shallmay not provide relief under the systems as provided for under Articles 12 and 13 for a request, where:
Amendment 95 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the dividend has been paid on a publicly traded share that the registered owner acquired within a period of twofive days before the ex-dividend date;
Amendment 96 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) the amount of the relief requested deriving from each payment exceeds EUR 5000.
Amendment 98 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) an exemption or a reduced rate of the withholding tax is claimed.
Amendment 99 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. The control powers of Member States, pursuant to their national legislation, on the taxable income to which the relief was applied, shall not be limited.
Amendment 100 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the certified financial intermediary requesting relief under Article 12 and/or 13 on behalf of a registered owner obtains from such registered owner a declaration that the registered owner:
Amendment 101 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) is the beneficial owner of the dividend or interest as defined under the national legislation of the source Member State or a double tax treaty; and
Amendment 102 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure certified financial intermediaries requesting relief under Article 12 and/or 13 on behalf of a registered owner to verify:
Amendment 107 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States may allow to obtain the declaration according to paragraph 1 and to carry out the verifications according to paragraph 2 on an annual basis.
Amendment 110 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may allow certified financial intermediaries maintaining a registered owner’s investment account to request a quick refund of the excess withholding tax, on behalf of such registered owner in accordance with Article 10 if the information referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article is provided as soon as possible after the payment date and at the latest within 25 calendar days from the date of payment of the dividend or interest.
Amendment 113 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall process a refund request made in accordance with paragraph 1 within 2540 calendar days from the date of such request or from the date reporting obligations under this Directive have been met by all relevant certified financial intermediaries, whichever is the latest. Member States shall apply interest in accordance with Article 14 on the amount of such refund for each day of delay after the 2540th day.
Amendment 118 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States may reject a refund request if any verification procedure or tax audit, based on risk assessment criteria and according to the national legislation, is iniatiated.
Amendment 119 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Member States shall, where national legislation includes such provisions, apply interest in accordance with Article 13(2) at a rate equal to the interest or equivalent charge applied by the Member State to late payments of income tax by registered owners, or, if the national legislation of the Member States does not include such provision, at the Euro short-term rate plus 50 basis points or the equivalent interest rate used by their Central Bank plus 50 basis points, if they are not part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism.
Amendment 133 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. In the evaluation report, the Commission shall: (a) examine whether Chapter III should be mandatory applied to all Member States; (b) examine whether the relief at source system should be applied in all Member States, and introduce further measures to facilite such a system for SMEs.
Amendment 142 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission relevant statistical information for the evaluation of the Directive in improving withholding tax relief procedures to reduce double taxation as well as combat tax abuse, in accordance with paragraph 3.
Amendment 144 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, specify the statistical information to be provided by Member States for the purposes of evaluation and the format and the conditions of communication of that information.
Amendment 148 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 – paragraph 3
Article 20 – paragraph 3
3. Information, including personal data, processed in accordance with this Directive shall be retained only as long afor no longer than is necessary to achieve the purposes of this Directive, and in any case in accordance with each data controller’s domestic rules on statute of limitations, but in any case no longer than 10 years.
Amendment 150 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 20267 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
Amendment 152 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 20278.
Amendment 154 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 6
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 6
Tax identification number, if available, and email address
Amendment 155 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 9
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 9
Name, TIN, if available, date of birth, address
Amendment 156 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 10
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 10
Name, LEI, TIN, address, EUIDif available, address, EUID, where applicable
Amendment 157 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Name, TIN, if available, date of birth, address
Amendment 158 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 15
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 15
Name, LEI, TIN, address, EUIDif available, address, EUID, where applicable
Amendment 159 #
2023/0187(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 18
Annex II – table 1 – column 2 – row 18
Name, LEI or TIN or EUID, if available, or EUID, where applicable, official address
Amendment 195 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) National medium-term fiscal- structural plans should bring together the fiscal, structural reforms and investment commitments of each Member State and these plans should be the cornerstone of the economic governance framework of the Union. Each Member State should present a medium-term plan that sets out its fiscal trajectory as well as priority strategic public investment and reform commitments that together ensureshould contribute to sustained and gradual debt reduction and sustainable and inclusive growth and resilience, avoiding a pro- cyclical fiscal policy, as well as broader reform and investment commitments, including in relation to the green and digital transitions, social and economic resilience and the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights. During the lifetime of the Recovery and Resilience Facility25 , commitments undertaken in the national Recovery and Resilience Plans should be duly taken into account. _________________ 25 Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (OJ L 57, 18.2.2021, p. 17).
Amendment 202 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10 a) Investments have proven to be an essential part of the economic and social recovery after the pandemic, and in response to inflation and the rise of the energy prices. In addition to investments in infrastructure, multiannual social investment in human capital, in particular in education, health and labour market integration, could harness the opportunities for societal and individual growth.
Amendment 211 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to simplify the Union fiscal framework and increase transparency, a single operational indicator anchored in debt sustainability should serve as a basis for setting the fiscal path and carrying out annual fiscal surveillance for each Member State. That single operational indicator should be based on nationally financed net primary expenditure, that is to say expenditure net of discretionary revenue measures and excluding interest expenditure as well as cyclical unemployment expenditure, costs related to the borrowing of funds for the loans related to the national plans in accordance with the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and expenditure on Union programmes fully matched by revenue from Union funds. This indicator allows for macro-economic stabilisation as it is not affected by the operation of automatic stabilisers, including revenue and expenditure fluctuations outside the direct control of the government.
Amendment 337 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘net expenditure path’ means the multi-annual trajectory for net expenditure of a Member State as set by the Council; a detailed description of such a trajectory is included in Annex II;
Amendment 342 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘national medium-term fiscal- structural plan’ means the document containing the medium term fiscal, reform and investment commitments of a Member State;
Amendment 347 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘annual progress report’ means the document of a Member State reporting on the implementation of the national medium-term fiscal-structural plan, including the net expenditure path, and of the reforms and investment commitments included in its national medium-term fiscal-structural plan;
Amendment 354 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
(7 a) ‘planning horizon’ means adjustment period;
Amendment 391 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(d a) the surveillance to detect, prevent and correct challenges identified in the social convergence reports under the Social Convergence Framework;
Amendment 481 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the public debt ratio at the end of the planning horizon is well below the public debt ratio in the year before the start of the technical trajectory; and
Amendment 497 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) national net expenditure growth remains below medium-term output growth, on average, as a rule over the horizon of the plan. The growth of net expenditure in relation to medium-term output growth will be commensurate to public debt challenges;
Amendment 583 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 627 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – title
Article 12 – title
Requirements of the national medium- term fiscal-structural plans
Amendment 654 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 699 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The set of reform and investment commitments underpinning an extension of the adjustment period, shall be commensurate with the degree of public debt challenges and challenges to medium- term growth in the Member State concerned, including demographic challenges.
Amendment 737 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point v
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point v
(v) ensure that the overall level of nationally financed public investment over the lifetime of the national medium-term fiscal-structural plan is higher than the medium-term level before the period of that plan; such elevated level of public investment has to be commensurate to the fulfilment of criteria laid down in points (i) to (iv) of this subparagraph.
Amendment 775 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. A revised national medium-term fiscal-structural plan submitted by a new government shall only reverse or remove investments present in the original plan if their removal does not result in unjustified additional costs for the Member State.
Amendment 797 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall assess each national medium-term fiscal-structural plan within 2one months of its submission. The Member State concerned and the Commission may agree to extend the period of assessment by a reasonable period if necessary.
Amendment 858 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) whether the public debt ratio at the end of the planning horizon is well below the public debt ratio in the year before the start of the technical trajectory.
Amendment 921 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall submit to the Commission an annual progress report on the implementation of its national medium-term fiscal-structural plan, by 15 April each year at the latesteach year in April, preferably by mid-April and not later than 30 April.
Amendment 922 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall submit to the Commission an annual progress report on the implementation of its national medium-term fiscal-structural plan, by 15efore end of April each year at the latest .
Amendment 950 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Each national independent fiscal institution referred to in Article 8 of Council Directive […]32 [on the national budgetary frameworks] shall provide an assessment of compliance of the budgetary outturns data reported in the progress report referred to in Article 20 with the net expenditure path. Where applicable, each national independent fiscal institution shall also analyse the factors underlying a deviation from the net expenditure path. The assessment of compliance with the net expenditure path referred to in this Article shall complement the assessment made by the Commission and the Council. _________________ 32 Council Directive […] of […] [amending Council Directive 2011/85/EU on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States] (OJ …., …, p,…)
Amendment 969 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. In the event of a significant risk of deviation from the net expenditure path due to which the public debt ratio of the Member State may fail to be on a downward path (or may fail to remain at a prudent level) or a risk that the government deficit may exceed the 3% of GDP reference value, the Commission may address a warning to the Member State concerned in accordance with Article 121(4) TFEU.
Amendment 981 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1
On a recommendation from the Commission, complemented by an independent assessment carried out by the European Fiscal Board, the Council may adopt a recommendation allowing Member States to deviate from their net expenditure path, in the event of a severe economic downturn in the euro area or the Union as a whole, provided it does not endanger fiscal sustainability in the medium term. The Council shall specify a time-limit for such deviation.
Amendment 985 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
As long as the severe economic downturn in the euro area or the Union as a whole persists, the Commission shall continue to monitor debt sustainability and ensure policy coordination and a consistent policy mix that takes into account the euro area and the Union dimension. The existence of the severe economic downturn referred to in this article will be subject to regular reviews carried out at least once a year.
Amendment 988 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3
Article 24 – paragraph 3
The Council, on a recommendation from the Commission, complemented by an assessment carried out by the European Fiscal Board, may extend the period during which Member States may deviate from the net expenditure paths, provided that the severe economic downturn in the euro area or the Union as a whole persists. An extension may be granted more than once. However, each extension shall be for an additional period of one year at most.
Amendment 1001 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
On a recommendation from the Commission, complemented by an assessment carried out by an independent fiscal institution, the Council may adopt a recommendation allowing a Member State to deviate from its net expenditure path where exceptional circumstances outside the control of the Member State lead to a major impact on the public finances of the Member State concerned, provided it does not endanger fiscal sustainability in the medium term. The Council shall specify a time-limit for such a deviation.
Amendment 1006 #
2023/0138(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 2
The Council, on a recommendation from the Commission, complemented by an assessment carried out by an independent fiscal institution, may extend the period during which the Member State may deviate from the net expenditure path, provided that the exceptional circumstances persist. The existence of the exceptional circumstances referred to in this Article will be subject to regular reviews carried out at least once a year. An extension may be granted more than once. However, each extension shall be for an additional period of one year at most.
Amendment 23 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In order to simplify the Union fiscal framework and increase transparency, a single operational indicator anchored in debt sustainability should serve as a basis for setting the fiscal path and carrying out annual fiscal surveillance for each Member State. That single indicator should be based on nationally financed net primary expenditure, that is to say expenditure net of discretionary revenue measures and excluding interest expenditure as well as cyclical unemployment expenditure and expenditure on Union programmes fully matched by revenue from Union funds, including the costs related to the borrowing of funds for the loans related to Union programmes. This indicator allows for macro-economic stabilisation as it is not affected by the operation of automatic stabilisers, including revenue and expenditure fluctuations outside the direct control of the government.
Amendment 69 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) ‘net expenditure’ means government expenditure net of interest expenditure, discretionary revenue measures, costs related to the borrowing of funds for the loans related to the national plans in accordance with the Recovery and Resilience Facility in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2021/241 , cyclical elements of unemployment benefit expenditure and other budgetary variables outside the control of the government, as defined in Annex II, point (a) of Regulation (EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council [on the preventive arm]*;
Amendment 114 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission, when preparing a report under Article 126(3) TFEU, shall take into account as a key relevant factor the degree of debt challenges as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) [on the preventive arm], in the Member State concerned. In particular, where the Member State faces substantial public debt challenges according to the most recent Debt Sustainability Monitor, it shall be considered a key factor leading to the opening of an excessive deficit procedure as a rule.
Amendment 153 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
The Commission shall, in its report under Article 126(3) TFEU, take into account the independent assessment of the Commission latest macroeconomic and budgetary forecast, compliance with the deficit and debt criterion together with relevant factors affecting the budgetary development in the Member State. Such assessment shall be carried out by the European Fiscal Board. The Commission shall explain in its report any differences from the European Fiscal Board's assessment.
Amendment 159 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The Council and the Commission shall make a balanced overall assessment of all the relevant factors, specifically, the extent to which they affect the assessment of compliance with the deficit and/or the debt criteria as aggravating or mitigating factors. Both the Council and the Commission shall explain in their overall assessment any differences from the European Fiscal Board's assessment.
Amendment 187 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The Council recommendation made in accordance with Article 126(7) TFEU shall establish a maximum deadline of six months for effective action to be taken by the Member State concerned. When warranted by the seriousness of the situation, the deadline for effective action may be three months. The Council recommendation shall also establish a deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit. In its recommendation, the Council shall also request that the Member State implements a corrective net expenditure path, which ensures that the general government deficit remains or is brought and maintained below the reference value within the deadline set in the recommendation. For the years when the general government deficit is expected to exceed the reference value, the corrective net expenditure path shall be consistent with a minimum annual adjustment of at least 0,5% of GDP as a benchmark, in terms of the net expenditure path defined in Article 2 of the Regulation (EU) [on the preventive arm].
Amendment 197 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The corrective net expenditure path shall also put the debt ratio on a plausibly downward path or keep it at a prudent level having regard toconsistent with the criteria established in Article 6 and Annex I of Regulation (EU) [on the preventive arm]. The corrective net expenditure path shall ensure that the average annual fiscal adjustment effort in the first three years is at least as high as the average annual fiscal effort of the total adjustment period.
Amendment 208 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EC) Np 1467/97
Article 3 – paragraph 6
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. Where effective action has been taken in compliance with a recommendation under Article 126(7) TFEU orand where exceptional circumstances outside the control of the government with a major impact on the public finances of the Member State concerned, including on the respect of the corrective net expenditure path recommended by the Council pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Article, occur after the adoption of that recommendation, the Council may decide, on a recommendation from the Commission, to adopt a revised recommendation under Article 126(7) TFEU. The revised recommendation, taking into account the relevant factors referred to in Article 2(3) of this Regulation may, in particular, extend the deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit by one year as a rule. In case the Council has established the existence of a severe economic downturn in the euro area or in the Union as a whole in accordance with Article 24 of Regulation (EU) [on the preventive arm], the Council may also decide, on a recommendation from the Commission, to adopt a revised recommendation under Article 126(7) TFEU provided that this does not endanger fiscal sustainability in the medium term. The revised recommendation may, in particular, extend the deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit by one year as a rule.;
Amendment 220 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Any Council decision to give notice to the participating Member State concerned to take measures for the deficit reduction in accordance with Article 126(9) TFEU shall be taken within two months of the Council decision under Article 126(8) TFEU establishing that no effective action has been taken. In the notice, the Council shall request that the Member State implements a corrective net expenditure path which ensures that the general government deficit remains or is brought and maintained below the reference value within the deadline set in the notice. For the years where the general government deficit is expected to exceed the reference value, the corrective net expenditure path shall be consistent with a minimum annual adjustment of at least 0,5% of GDP as a benchmark. , in terms of the net expenditure path defined in Article 2 of the Regulation (EU) [on the preventive arm].
Amendment 226 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The corrective net expenditure path shall also put the debt ratio on a plausibly downward path or keep it at a prudent level having regard toconsistent with the criteria established in Article 6 and Annex I of Regulation (EU) [on the preventive arm]. The corrective net expenditure path shall ensure that the average annual fiscal adjustment effort in the first three years is at least as high as the average annual fiscal effort of the total adjustment period. The Council shall also indicate measures conducive to the achievement of the corrective net expenditure path.;
Amendment 235 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Regulation No 1467/97
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Where effective action has been taken in compliance with a notice under Article 126(9) TFEU orand where exceptional circumstances outside the control of the government with major impact on the public finances of the Member State concerned, including on the respect of the corrective net expenditure path referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, occur after the adoption of that notice, the Council may decide, on a recommendation from the Commission, to adopt a revised notice under Article 126(9) TFEU. The revised notice, taking into account the relevant factors referred to in Article 2(3) of this Regulation may, in particular, extend the deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit by one year as a rule. In case the Council has established the existence of a severe economic downturn in the euro area or in the Union as a whole in accordance with Article 24 of Regulation (EU) [on the preventive arm], the Council may also decide, on a recommendation from the Commission, to adopt a revised notice under Article 126(9) TFEU, on condition that it does not endanger fiscal sustainability in the medium term. The revised notice may, in particular, extend the deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit by one year as a rule.;
Amendment 274 #
2023/0137(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97
Article 17a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 17a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) the effectiveness of this Regulation, in particular in reducing excessive deficits;
Amendment 142 #
2023/0115(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20
(20) ‘client funds deposits’ means funds that account holders that are financial institutions as defined in Article 4(1), point (26), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 or credit servicer as defined in Article 3, point 8, of Directive (EU) 2021/2167 deposit in the course of their business with a credit institution for the account of their clients;
Amendment 163 #
2023/0115(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – -a (new)Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – -a (new)Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraphs 3a and 3b (new)
(-a) the following subparagraphs 3a and 3b are added t: “Member States shall ensure that for specific deposits laid down in national law the coverage level referred to in Article 6(1) applies to each of the absolutely entitled persons referred to in the first subparagraph. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, when determining the repayable amount for an individual absolutely entitled person, the DGS shall not take into account the aggregate fund deposits placed by that person with the same credit institution. Member States shall ensure that DGSs repay covered deposits either to the depositor for the benefit of each absolutely entitled person, or to the absolutely entitled person directly.”
Amendment 168 #
2023/0115(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 8b – paragraph 1a (new)
Article 8b – paragraph 1a (new)
1a. In addition to paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that the client fund deposits in accounts held by crypto- asset service providers authorized in accordance with Article 63 Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, crowdfunding service providers and credit servicers that meet the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, point (a) and (c) of this Article are covered by the DGSs.
Amendment 17 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In light of the close link between the quality of honey and its origin and the need for the consumer not to be misled regarding the quality of the product, Directive 2001/110/EC lays down rules on the labelling of the origin where the honey has been harvested. In particular, Article 2(4) of that Directive requires the country or countries of origin where the honey has been harvested to be indicated on the label and provides that, if honey originates in more than one Member State or third country, the mandatory indication of the countries of origin may be replaced by one of the following, as appropriate: ‘blend of EU honeys’, ‘blend of non-EU honeys’, ‘blend of EU and non-EU honeys’. The different rules adopted on this basis by Member States may have misled consumers and may have hindered the functioning of the internal market. In the light of the Farm to Fork Strategy’s objective of strengthening consumers in making informed choices, including on the origin of their food, andlso in the interest to preserve the efficient functioning of the internal market throughout the Union through a harmonisation of the labelling rules, it is appropriate to revise the rules for honey origin labelling and provide that the country or countries of origin should be mentioned on the packaging in descending order of their share in weight. In light of the reduced size of the packs containing only a single portion of honey (breakfast packs) and the resulting technical difficulties, it is therefore appropriate to exempt those packspacks the largest surface of which have an area of less than 10 cm from the obligation of listing all individual countries of origin, where the honey originates in more than one country.
Amendment 27 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) Following the "From the Hive" action carried out by the European Commission's Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE), together with the national authorities of 18 countries belonging to the European Food Fraud Network, the European Anti- Fraud Office (OLAF) and the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC), a very high percentage of imported honeys were found to be adulterated with cheap ingredients, such as sugar syrups and water, to artificially increase the product's volume. Directive 2001/110, amended by Directive 2014/63, empowers the European Commission to establish the most appropriate methods of analysis to ensure that honey marketed in the European Union complies with the requirements of the legislation. These methods are now obsolete, and there is an urgent need to update them regularly in the light of the latest scientific developments, in collaboration with the Commission's Joint Research Centre, in order to prevent fraudulent practices.
Amendment 38 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) It is also essential to improve traceability from the beekeeper to the consumer, with a minimum of compulsory, harmonized rules. At present, traceability rules do not make it possible to link the various operators in contact with the product, which encourages fraud. Given the difficulties involved in tracing the origin of honey, a specific traceability system needs to be set up for this sector.
Amendment 42 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 c (new)
Recital 3 c (new)
(3c) In order to avoid any ambiguity for the consumer and guarantee the traceability of honey, ultrafiltered honey, referred to in the Directive 2001/110 as "filtered honey", should no longer be allowed to be marketed under the name of honey. While beekeepers commonly use wide-mesh honey sieves to remove any plant debris or pieces of wax, ultrafiltration removes much, if not almost all, of the pollen from honey. Pollen is the most important element present in honey on which analyses are based to verify its floral and geographical origin. The absence of pollen in honey by ultrafiltration therefore removes one of the essential components and prevents verification of the country or countries of origin.
Amendment 46 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 d (new)
Recital 3 d (new)
(3d) Heat treatment above 40-50°C degrades the sensitive components of honey. However, HMF (Hydroxymethylfurfural) content and the diastase index can only be used to assess the gross degradation of honeys. A minimum threshold should be defined for the presence of invertase, a much more sensitive enzyme, which degrades rapidly once high temperatures are reached. To ensure that consumers are properly informed, the term "virgin honey" referring to the absence of significant heat treatment may be included on the label on the front of the commercial packaging of the honey if no heat treatment has degraded highly sensitive enzymes such as invertase, from harvesting to potting.
Amendment 48 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 e (new)
Recital 3 e (new)
(3e) The commercialisation of honeys that are not naturally matured by bees, most of which are imported from third countries, distorts competition in the EU market. In most cases, this involves vacuum evaporation of the water contained in the honey, which results in a depletion of the aromas naturally present. The rapid and artificial evaporation of water from honey competes with the slow dehumidification process carried out naturally by bees in the hive. Artificial evaporation must therefore be prohibited.
Amendment 77 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) The country of origin where the honey hwas been harvested ishall be indicated on the label. If the honey originates infrom more than one country, the countries of origin where the honey hwas been harvested shallmust be indicated on the label of packsages whose largest surface area is greater than 10 cm2. The countaining more than 25 g;ries of origin must be indicated in descending order, with their respective percentages in the blend and on the front of the pack, close to the product's trade name. Countries of origin should indicated in full on the label.
Amendment 93 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a a (new)
(aa) A traceability system for honey should be set up, complementing the horizontal rules already applicable to the agri-food sector in Article 18 of Regulation No. (EC) 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European commission is empowered to elaborate no later than 12 months after the entry into force of this Directive, a delegated act introducing a harmonised traceability system enabling competent authorities to trace the entire history of the honey produced and imported into the EU back to the harvesting beekeepers or operators in the case of imported honeys.
Amendment 97 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a b (new)
(ab) Except for honeys intended for industrial use, the term "virgin honey" may be included on the label on the front of the commercial packaging of the honey if no heat treatment has degraded highly sensitive enzymes such as invertase, from harvesting to potting, while complying with the conditions referred to in Annex II, points 6 (diastase index and hydroxymethylfurfural content) and 7 (invertase index).
Amendment 104 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) For the purpoexcept in the cases of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 and in particular Articles 12 to 15 thereof, the particulars to be indicated according to point (a) of this paragraph shall be considered as mandatory particulars in accordance with Article 9 of that Regulation.honey intended for industry, these names may be supplemented by indications relating to: floral or vegetable origin, if the product comes entirely or essentially from the origin indicated and has the organoleptic, physicochemical and microscopic characteristics thereof, regional, territorial or topographical origin, if the product comes entirely from the origin indicated, specific quality criteria.
Amendment 107 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110/EC
Annex I – paragraph 2 – point b – point viii
Annex I – paragraph 2 – point b – point viii
(ba) Annex I is amended as follows: Paragraph 2, point (b)(viii) is replaced by the following: (viii) virgin honey: the honey obtained which has been extracted from the combs, decanted and then, if necessary, sieved. Honey so designated has not been heated to the extent that its enzymes and other thermally sensitive elements are degraded to such an extent that they no longer comply with the criteria laid down in points 6 and 7 of Annex II.
Amendment 110 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110 /EC
Annex II – paragraph 2
Annex II – paragraph 2
Amendment 112 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110/EC
Annex II – paragraph 3
Annex II – paragraph 3
(bc) Annex II, third sentence is replaced by the following: No significant change in the pollen count or pollen spectrum of pollen smaller than 100 µm is permitted. No constituents of honey smaller than 100 µm may be removed.
Amendment 113 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2001/110/EC
Annex II – paragraph 4 – point 6 a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 4 – point 6 a (new)
(bd) A paragraph 7 is added in Annex II as follows: 7 (new). invertase index (Gontarski unit) for "virgin honeys". Determined after processing and blending. - generally, not less than 50 U/kg - honeys with a low natural enzyme content, not less than 25 U/kg
Amendment 130 #
2023/0105(COD)
(b) As an alternative to the product names referred to in subparagraph (a), Annex III provides a list of particular designations. The designations listed in Annex III, Part I, may be used in the language and unAnnex I, points 2 and 3, shall apply only to the products defined therein and shall be used in trader the conditions laid down therein. The designations listed in Annex III, Part II,o designate them. These names may be usreplaced inby the official language of the Union of the Member State where simple product name ‘honey’, except in the case of "comb honey", "honey withe product is plaieceds on the market.;f comb" and "industrial honey".
Amendment 149 #
2023/0105(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Directive 2001/113/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a (new)
In the case of honey intended for industry, bulk containers, packaging and sales documentation shall clearly indicate the full product name as set out in point 3 of Annex I.
Amendment 68 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point k
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point k
(k) Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council105 ; __________________ 105 Directive 94/62/ECRegulation [EU]…/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10)., amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2019/904, and repealing Directive 94/62/EC;
Amendment 73 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Large cross border businesses Traders falling within the scope of the proposal for a Council Directive on Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)1 placing products of the same category on the market in more than one EU Member States or in both EU and non-EU countries and use environmental claim for any of those products shall comply with the same requirements in all markets.
Amendment 75 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘explicit environmental claim’ means an environmental claim that is in textual form or contained in an environmental label or in a form of their digital alternatives;
Amendment 84 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2 a (new)
Article2a Rules on the use of carbon farming units Carbon farming sequestration units and carbon farming emission reduction units certified under Regulation (EU) .../2023 [of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals] may be used for making claims and claims based on offsets under this Directive, without prejudice to the provisions set out in Annex I to the Directive 2005/29/EC as amended by Directive (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council [Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition] and provisions to be set out in the Regulation (EU) .../2023 [of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals].
Amendment 85 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that traders carry out an assessment to substantiate explicit environmental claims. This assessment shall be strictly relevant to the substantiation of the respective claim and shall include:
Amendment 88 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) rely on widely recognised peer- reviewed scientific evidence, use accurate information and take into account relevant international standards;
Amendment 92 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) demonstrate that environmental impacts, environmental aspects or environmental performance that are subject to the claim are significant from a life- cycle perspective as defined in ISO 14040:2006;
Amendment 96 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) demonstrate that the claim is not equivalent to requirements imposed by law on products within the product group, or traders within the sector, provided that they go further than basic standards applied to imported products or common practices related to those products. When it comes to agriculture related claims, they should demonstrate that they go beyond standards for good agricultural and environmental condition of land (GAECs) and Statutory management requirement (SMR) as defined in Regulation (EU) 2115/2021, applicable at the level of operator. Agricultural practices committed under schemes for the climate, the environment and animal welfare (‘eco-schemes’) under the conditions set out in Regulation (EU) 2115/2021 represent eligible and verifiable claims as set out in this Regulation;
Amendment 106 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) include relevant secondary information for environmental impacts, environmental aspects, or environmental performance which is representative of the specific value chain of the product or the trader on which a claim is made, in cases where no primary information is available. For product categories and sectors which have developed a PEFCR and/or OEFSR, these may be used when assessing the life cycle;
Amendment 107 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(ja) ensure that the evidence is independently audited and verified and the audit report is made available;
Amendment 108 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point j b (new)
(jb) include information on which methodology the trader used to calculate the claim;
Amendment 109 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Where it is demonstrated that significant environmental impacts that are not subject to the claim exist but there is no widely recognised scientific evidence to perform the assessment referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1, the trader making the claim on another aspect shall take account of available information and, if necessary, update the assessment in accordance with paragraph 1 once widely recognised scientific evidence is available. To support traders in making the assessment referred to in point (c), the European Commission shall, within 12 months from the entry into force of the Directive, publish and regularly update the list of methodologies which are compliant with Article 3. This shall include also methodologies verified in line with Article 10, paragraph 2, point b.
Amendment 114 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. When specifying further the requirements for substantiation of explicit environmental claims in accordance with previous paragraph, the Commission shall take into account scientific or other available technical information, including relevant international standards, EU standards included in EU regulations that are higher than international standards, and where relevant consider the following:
Amendment 128 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that a trader is required to communicate an explicit environmental claim in accordance with the requirements set out in this Article. Member States shall ensure that the disclosure of the required data and information does not interfere with a company’s intellectual property or reveal confidential or sensitive business information.
Amendment 130 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Explicit environmental claim made by traders about a single product does not apply to any other product, business-to- consumer commercial practice and communication, or practices and communication of a trader overall and vice versa, without substantiating each of those individual claims at product or trader level independently.
Amendment 134 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
That information shall include at least the following:
Amendment 135 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) the underlying studies or calculations used to assess, measure and monitor the environmental impacts, environmental aspects or environmental performance covered by the claim, without omitting the results of such studies or calculations and, explanations of their scope, assumptions and limitations, unless the information is a trade secret in line with Article 2 paragraph 1 of Directive (EU) 2016/943112 ; __________________ 112 Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure (OJ L 157, 15.6.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 141 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Only environmental labels awarded under environmental labelling schemes established under Union law may present a rating or score of a product or trader based on an aggregated indicator of environmental impacts of a product or trader. This paragraph shall apply to all environmental labels presenting a rating or score of a product or trader, including those run by economic and non-economic operators.
Amendment 149 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
From [OP: Please insert the date = the date of transposition of this Directive] no new national or regional environmental labelling schemes shall be established by public authorities of the Member States. However, national or regional environmental labelling schemes established prior to that date may continue to award the environmental labels on the Union market, provided they meet the requirements of this Directive. Furthermore, national schemes may be established provided they conform with the standards set under this Directive.
Amendment 152 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
–
Private environmental labelling schemes established prior to that date may continue to award the environmental labels on the Union market, provided they meet the requirements of this Directive. Carbon certification schemes established under Regulation (EU) .../2023 [of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a Union certification framework for carbon removals] may also be approved as environmental labelling schemes, provided that they comply with the requirements set under this Directive.
Amendment 154 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
In order to ensure a uniform application across the Union, the Commission shall adopt within 12 months after the adoption of this Directive implementing acts to:
Amendment 161 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Upon the request of the operator of the environmental labelling scheme, the verifier shall assess the compliance of the scheme with Articles 7 and 8, within 60 days upon reception of all relevant documents defined in implementing acts referred to in paragraph 10. Once verified, traders can display the label issued by the scheme without additional verifications steps.
Amendment 163 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 9
Article 10 – paragraph 9
9. TWithin 12 months after the publication of this Directive the Commission shall adopt implementing acts to set out details regarding the form of the certificate of conformity referred to in paragraph 5 and the technical means for issuing such certificate of conformity. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.
Amendment 164 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 9 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Within 12 months after the official publication of this Directive, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts to set out details regarding the documents to be provided for the verification of substantiation methods.
Amendment 165 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 9 b (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. To support traders in carrying out the verification and certification procedure referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall publish within 24 months from the entry into force of the Directive and keep up-to-date a list of the accredited verifiers.
Amendment 167 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point e
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) the verifier shall have a sufficient number of suitably qualified and experienced personnel responsible for carrying out the verification tasks; including experience in life-cycle assessments and sufficient knowledge of the traders’ respective activities;
Amendment 176 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The powers conferred on competent authorities under paragraph 1 shall include at least the following:
Amendment 179 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Where, further to the evaluation referred to in the first subparagraph, the competent authorities find that the substantiation and communication of the explicit environmental claim or the environmental labelling scheme does not comply with the requirements laid down in this Directive, they shall notify the trader making the claim about the non- compliance prior to publishing the report mentioned in article 15(1) and require that trader to take all appropriate corrective action within 30 days to bring the explicit environmental claim or the environmental labelling scheme into compliance with this Directive or to cease the use of and references to the non-compliant explicit environmental claim. Such action shall be as effective and rapid as possible, while complying with the principle of proportionality and the right to be heard.
Amendment 182 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of the first subparagraph, non-governmental entities or organisations promoting human health, environmental or consumer protection and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed to have sufficient interest.
Amendment 191 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) fines for natural or legal person who falsely claims that environmental claims made by a trader that comply with this Directive can be deemed as ‘greenwashing’
Amendment 199 #
2023/0085(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) As part of the evaluation and review referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, and to ensure a level playing field among traders, the European Commission shall undertake an impact assessment of the measures established for micro, small and medium sized enterprises in Articles 4, 5, 10 and 12, and consider their review after the Directive is implemented.
Amendment 27 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Where Member States decide to support publicly financed new investments (“direct price support schemes”), in particular, in low carbon, non-fossil fuel electricity generation to achieve the Union’s decarbonisation objectives, those schemes should be structured by way of two-way contracts for difference such as to include, in addition to a revenue guarantee, an upward limitation of the market revenues of the generation assets concerned. New investments for the generation of electricity should include investments in new power generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime.
Amendment 28 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) However, to the extent that the limitation to set out direct price support schemes in the form of two-way contracts for difference narrows down the types of direct price support schemes that Member States can adopt as regards renewable energy sources, it should be primarily limited to low carbon, non-fossil fuel technologies, with low and stable operational costs and to technologies which typically do not provide flexibility to the electricity system, while excluding technologies that are at early stages of their market deployment. This is necessary to ensure that the economic viability of generation technologies with high marginal costs is not jeopardised and to maintain the incentives of the technologies which can offer flexibility to the electricity system to bid in the electricity market based on their opportunity costs. In addition, the limitation to set out direct price support schemes in the form of two-way contracts for difference should not apply to emerging technologies for which other types of direct price support schemes may be better placed to incentivise their uptake. The limitation should be without prejudice to the possible exemption for small-scale installations and demonstration projects pursuant to Article 4 (3) of (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and consider the specificities of renewable energy communities in accordance with Article 22 (7) of that Directive.
Amendment 29 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) In view of the need to provide regulatory certainty of producers, the obligation for Member States to apply direct price support schemes for the production of electricity in the form of two-way contracts for difference should apply onlyin particular to new investments for the generation of electricity from the sources specified in the recital above.
Amendment 63 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation 2019/943/EU
Article 19a – paragraph 3
Article 19a – paragraph 3
3. Guarantee schemes for PPAs backed by the Member States shall include provisions to avoid lowering the liquidity in electricity markets and shall not provide support to the purchase of generation from fossil fuels. as of 1 January 2030 unless needed to achieve the Member States climate neutrality objectives. (Article 19a)
Amendment 77 #
2023/0077(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation 2019/943/EU
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – point ea (new)
Article 19b – paragraph 2 – point ea (new)
(ea) fossil fuels until 31 December 2029 unless needed to achieve the Member States climate neutrality objectives. (Article 19b)
Amendment 13 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the full impact of Brexit is not yet fully known, not least because the full implementation of the TCA in relation to fisheries is still ongoing and will only be completed after the transition period ends on 30 June 2026; highlights the importance of a faithful implementation of the Agreement considering that issues are still emerging;
Amendment 16 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its deep concern at the uncertainty created by the review clause (Article 510) under Heading Five (Fisheries) of Part Two of the TCA, which will be applied four years after the end of the adjustment period; calls on the Commission to swiftly and steadfastly engage in negotiations for a multiannual post-2026 agreement while keeping in mind the stability and economic viability of the sector; highlights that this agreement must be linked to the overall review of the TCA and must not allow further losses in shared quotas for the EU, stresses in this regard the importance of keeping all aspects of the TCA interlinked and especially access to the single market for the UK connected to the aspects of fisheries;
Amendment 25 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates the fact that decisions on equivalence are not reciprocal and do not form part of the TCA; notes also the UK’s decisions on equivalence in respect of the EU and also in respect of other non-EU countries such as Switzerland, where mutual recognition status has been agreed; recalls that decisions on equivalence could benefit EU firms in terms of greater access to the UK market, including for banking, payment services, investment services, and insurance; notes that the EU has only granted the UK equivalence status in one area – central counterparties – on a time- limited basis, recently extended until 2025; calls for further equivalence decisions to be considered, notes in this regard that the Commission has previously indicated that equivalence assessments for the UK could resume once the Memorandum of Understanding is agreed3a; notes that as of October 2021, the EU had granted 22 equivalence decisions to the United States compared to one in the case of the UK4 ; recognises that while equivalence assessments are predominantly technical, broader political factors are relevant, and supports the Commission’s position that decisions on equivalence should be made when they are in the EU’s interests; encourages the Commission to discuss further equivalence decisions in order to provide greater market access benefits to both EU and UK firms; _________________ 3a https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/ britain-eu-edge-forward-with-financial- services-forum-plan-2021-02-23/ 4 European Affairs Committee of the House of Lords, ‘1st Report of Session 2022–23: The UK-EUrelationship in financial services’, 23 June 2022.
Amendment 32 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the desire of the British Government to adopt divergent regulation from the EU in respect of financial services, including by way of the Financial Services and Markets Bill5 , which proposes to repeal, replace, or amend retained EU law in the area of financial services and to delegate greater responsibility to UK regulators; welcomes the EU’s recent progress on legislation in respect of financial services, even where this may result in regulatory divergence from the UK, including with respect to cryptocurrencies, taxonomy, listing and anti-money laundering; acknowledges that the UK and the EU may adopt different regulatory approaches in the area of financial services and may not necessarily maintain a harmonised regulatory regime; supports the EU’s legislative progress in this area, even where this may result in regulatory divergence from the UK; stresses, however, the benefits of future regulatory cooperation, and of engaging in the development and integration of international standards; _________________ 5 UK Parliament, ‘Financial Services and Markets Bill’, 11 May 2023.
Amendment 33 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that Brexit has destabilised relations among North Atlantic countries; believes that Brexit should not be misused to manipulate the distribution of quotas in the Northern Agreements; insist that the historically evolved distribution of fishing opportunities, always based on the best available scientific data and advice should be respected; calls on the Commission to take initiatives to find new arrangements with States in the North-East Atlantic in order to find more stable and long term arrangedments in the area of fisheries management;
Amendment 40 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the TCA offers the EU an opportunity to develop and strengthen its own financial services infrastructure and expertise; strongly supports the completion of the capital markets union and the banking union, based on an approach that is outward-looking, innovative and competitive; recalls that the City of London remains a major centre for financial services with a global reach that EU businesses could benefit from accessing 6 ; recognises the importance of a strong financial services sector for both the EU and the UK and supports efforts to enhance the EU’s financial services infrastructure and expertise; _________________ 6 Reuters, ‘London is top global finance centre but lags in key areas, says study’, 27 January 2022.
Amendment 43 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reiterate that the Trade and Cooperation Agreement provides that technical measures should be proportionate, should be based on the best scientific advice, should not be discriminatory, should apply equally to vessels from both parties and must be notified in advance; calls for better cooperation and coordination in relation to the introduction of technical, management and control measures including developing clear and non- discriminatory criteria for these measures to ensure that they cannot be used to indirectly restrict access to fishing fleets where they have fishing rights; highlights especially that the designation of marine protected areas must be non- discriminatory, science-based and proportionate; emphasises that marine protected areas should be established with well-defined conservation objectives and should not be used as a tool to restrict foreign access to waters; regrets, in this regard, the unilateral approach that the UK has taken in relation to the designation of new areas around the Dogger Bank and the fact that they are planned to be used for other economic activities;
Amendment 45 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Reiterate its call that the Commission embrace its role as the EU’s representative in dealings with third countries in order to propose enhanced participatory management models and co- management in cross-border situations with third countries;
Amendment 51 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Supports continued cooperation between the EU and the UK in areas related to economic and monetary affairs that are of mutual interest, including tackling money laundering, terrorist financing and customs fraud, countering harmful tax regimes, implementing sanctions and promoting global financial stability; invites the Council and the Commission to launch an assessment of the UK's tax regimes on the basis of objective criteria laid down in the Code of Conduct for Business Taxation1a; _________________ 1a https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/docu ment/ST-14452-2022-INIT/en/pdf
Amendment 59 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises that the close economic links between Ireland and Northern Ireland will continue despite the latter being part of a designated third country; supports an acknowledgement of these economic links, including with respect to the supervision of transactions between both jurisdictions; calls for measures to ensure that such links are not disrupted by any changes in regulatory or legal frameworks, particularly in respect of services provided to consumers and SMEs who cannot take advantage of being mobile; emphasises the importance of maintaining close economic ties and minimising disruption in the aftermath of Brexit, particularly with respect to this relationship;
Amendment 74 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses that such a forum must operate in a transparent manner with stakeholder engagement as appropriate; notes that, after several years of turmoil, institutions and investors in the EU and UK need clarity and legal certainty in order to make business decisions and investments;
Amendment 76 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls on the parties to use the forum to identify and address mutual threats to financial stability and consumer protections, as well as new developments and innovations in the markets, to promote a consistent approach where possible;
Amendment 78 #
2022/2188(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Stresses that the parties to the forum should engage in the spirit of sincere cooperation to ensure that the relationship is constructive and underpinned by the common objectives of safeguarding financial stability and consumer protection;
Amendment 42 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas on 24 February 2022 the Russian Federation illegally in, the Russian's full scale invasion of Ukraine has seriously aggravadted Ukraine and, as a result, severely disruptedan already difficult and challenging situation in the agri-food sector, which is still recovering from the consequences of the COVID pandemic and is suffering from the on-going climate crisis, leading to an increase in global food insecurity;
Amendment 46 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the effects of the crisis caused by Russian aggression against Ukraine have put food security and the resilience of the global food system at the center of the political agenda; whereas food security, in terms of political importance and urgency of response, is now placed on an equal footing with energy security, defence and the fight against climate change, both at the EU and international levels;
Amendment 58 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the war against Ukraine has brought about an increase in food, energy and input prices and has a severe impact on consumers and the most vulnerable strata of society;
Amendment 66 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas, as a result of the war against Ukraine, bottlenecks in critical agricultural infrastructure, in particular transport and storage infrastructure, is hampering the movement of food, feed and other agricultural products;
Amendment 69 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas food security goes beyond agriculture and food production and has impacts on several areas, not only on primary producers and consumers, but also on the wider economy, trade, development and humanitarian efforts and on social and regional cohesion;
Amendment 72 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas food security is a complex and multifaceted subject and it requires a cohesive and integrated approach. Considering and dealing with these challenges from different perspectives: economic, trade, environmental, regional and the prism of international development;
Amendment 89 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas, as a result of the global supply crisis, the FAO estimates that international food and feed prices have continued to rise significantly above their already high levels; whereas, in order to identify and prevent food speculation, operators need to become more transparent with regard to their share of value added throughout the food supply chain; whereas it would also be necessary to assess the reasons why the prices of agricultural inputs have increased and what effect they have on the increase in food prices;
Amendment 147 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas generational renewal is one of the biggest challenges for a resilient agricultural sector in the EU; whereas young farmers in particular are innovative and, if properly remunerated, motivated and empowered, are willing to make investments that may increase the sustainability of agriculture and the same time maintain EU’s production capacity and competitiveness;
Amendment 169 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the sharp rise in global fertiliser prices, together with the sharp rise in other input costs for farmers, threatens food security; whereas in September 2022 the prices of nitrogen fertilisers increased by 149% on the EU fertilizers market compared to the previous year;
Amendment 178 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. Considering that an estimated 20% of all food produced is lost or wasted, and that more than 36 million people cannot afford a quality meal every other day, and considering that the neediest population is increasing as a result of the current economic crisis.
Amendment 185 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Recital I b (new)
I b. whereas food security is a key element for ensuring the strategic autonomy and prosperity of the European Union;
Amendment 206 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic and the illegal Russian invasion of Ukraine have once again demonstratedexposed structural problems faced by the European agricultural sector, namely the need for the EU to strengthen its food security and, reduce its dependence on imports from outside the EU; welcomes the adoption, due to the exceptional current circumstances, of temporary meaith regard to critical production inputs and raw materials, and ensures to increase EU production during the 2022/23 harvest season, which will contribute to food securithe smooth functioning of the internal market, therefore increasing the EU's strategic autonomy;
Amendment 216 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines the need for flexibility in order to increase the adaptation capacity in the short-term for the agricultural sector; welcomes the adoption, due to the exceptional current circumstances, of temporary measures to increase EU production during the 2022/23 harvest season, which will contribute to food security;
Amendment 222 #
2022/2183(INI)
1 b. Is in favour of establishing a priority package of legislative actions within the framework of the Farm to Fork strategy, in order to accelerate the most urgent measures aimed at ensuring food security in view of the risks of hardship resulting from the current war in Ukraine; considers it essential to compensate any action that could lead to a reduction in the European production with the parallel introduction of other actions that would provide viable alternatives;
Amendment 232 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Subheading 2
Green Deal andAgenda for a Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture
Amendment 255 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Calls on the Commission, Member States and economic actors to think strategically about the place of sustainable livestock farming in all European territories, taking into account, in particular, its role in the nitrogen cycle and the supply of organic amendments to crops, the valorisation of all types of agricultural soils and the search for a diversified and balanced diet
Amendment 301 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 d (new)
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3 d. Stresses the importance to make efficient and well-targeted investments in mitigation, as well as adaptation measures in order to reduce risks and avoid significant costs in the long-term, at the same time taking advantage of opportunities; while underlines that the increase of the climate resilience of the European agriculture industry will allow agricultural sector to remain competitive in global markets, providing employment and economic growth;
Amendment 320 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Considers that the Commission should assess the potential of maximising the synergies with EU renewable energy production to increase the availability of high-protein content feed;
Amendment 340 #
Amendment 346 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the EU to speed up the adoption of legislation on the use of new cultivation techniques in order to increase yields and make crops more resilient to climate change and new pathogens, particularly in view of the droughts and water shortages that are afflicting an increasing number of EU Member States; points out that new cultivation targetechniques can promote sustainable agriculture, which is not possible without innovation; reminds of the importance of research and that the research results are brought into farming practices;
Amendment 352 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the EU to speed up the adoption of legislation on the use of new cultivationgenomic techniques in order to increase yields and make crops more resilient to climate change and new pathogens, particularly in view of the droughts and water shortages that are afflicting an increasing number of EU Member States; points out that new cultivation targetgenomic techniques can promote sustainable agriculture, which is not possible without innovation;
Amendment 377 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that digital technologies and precision crop management can provide forward-looking solutions to the challenges arising when it comes to monitoring deforestation, the use of pesticides and fertilisers or water consumption for agriculture and increase the yield; calls on the Commission to step up and accelerate the use of digital innovation to modernise EU agriculture, with solutions which can be taken into use at reasonable investment costs, enabling farmers to realise their full production potential and safeguard their incomes in the context of green transition;
Amendment 386 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that, while that space data and AI technologies can be a source of much valuable information for agriculture and for the whole food chain, i.e. technology enables the movement of information from the producer to the consumer and vice versa, improves the operation of the entire value chain, reduces wastage, lowers logistics costs, just to name a few, it can still only be put to very limited use, as in most cases it is not freely available or is too complex to be processed by farms or local authorities; calls for increased use of such data and technologies to help farmers through the green and digital transitions, while ensuring the resilience of EU agriculture;
Amendment 428 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Notes that the war in Ukraine has further exposed that food production in the EU is dependent on inputs from outside the Union; Emphasises in that regard that to ensure food production in the long term, resources that are readily available and produced within the EU should be utilised and developed to the fullest, such as organic fertilisers and low-risk or organic plant protection products.
Amendment 459 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Amendment 461 #
Amendment 462 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Amendment 473 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 8 a (new)
Subheading 8 a (new)
Notes that, while an estimated 20% of the total food produced is lost or wasted, 36.2million people cannot afford a quality meal every second day[1].Reducing food waste is a shared responsibility and food producers, processors, distributors, retailers and consumers must contribute to it.[1] 1(Eurostat, 2020).
Amendment 516 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. h) Stresses the need to continue to support supply management through support for producer organizations and interbranch organisations.
Amendment 522 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 15 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Farmers and the future of the Common Agricultural Policy
Amendment 523 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point a (new)
Paragraph 15 – point a (new)
(a) Calls on the Commission to set up a policy that will integrate in a coherent way food production and food safety, while at the same time ensuring the coherence with trade policy, environmental policy, humanitarian and international development policies;
Amendment 524 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point b (new)
Paragraph 15 – point b (new)
(b) Calls on the Commission to review the CAP budget in the MFF to secure both food security and green transitions providing the necessary leverage for investments;
Amendment 525 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point c (new)
Paragraph 15 – point c (new)
(c) Highlights the importance of ensuring that farmers have a predictable source of income and can make a living from their activity;
Amendment 526 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point d (new)
Paragraph 15 – point d (new)
(d) Stresses the importance of active training of farmers and support regarding new mitigation and adaptation agriculture practices;
Amendment 529 #
2022/2183(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – point g (new)
Paragraph 15 – point g (new)
(g) Emphasizes that the Commission must take additional measures to introduce a more sustainable, transparent and fairer food chain in order to strengthen producer’s position to enhance EU’s current security of supply and food security;
Amendment 26 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas Member States are free to decide on their own economic policies, in particular their own tax policies within the boundaries of the EU Treaties; whereas a well-functioning tax system is in the interest of Member States in order to ensure proper tax collection; whereas, although tax policy largely remains a responsibility of the Member States, the single market requires coordination in setting tax policy in order to further single market integration;
Amendment 38 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas a number of European companies are battling strong headwinds as a result of the current adverse economic and social situations;
Amendment 51 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the BEPS action plan managed to establish a global consensus on many issues regarding the fight against tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning;
Amendment 56 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the EU led by example in transposing international agreements into a high number of tax directives improving coordination and the EU’s fight against tax fraud, tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning;
Amendment 62 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas as of 16 December 2022, 138 statejurisdictions, including all EU Member States, had agreed on the reform of the international tax system through a two- pillar solution;
Amendment 67 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas tax policy fragmentation createsontributes to creation of various obstacles for citizens and companies in the single market, particularly small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs); whereas these obstacles discourage cross-border economic activity and can distort the single market;
Amendment 69 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas tax policy fragmentation creates various obstacles for citizens and companies in the single market, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); whereas these obstacles discourage cross-border economic activity and can distort the single market; whereas Member States continue to lose tax revenue due to harmful tax practices enabled by loopholes between Member States’ legislation, or between Member States and third countries, and estimates of revenue lost as a result of harmful tax practices range from EUR 36-37 billion to EUR 160-190 billion per year; whereas policy fragmentations might increase the cost of enforcement for tax authorities;
Amendment 110 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that EU Member States have a full responsibility for proper tax collection and they are entitled to decide on their own tax systems;
Amendment 111 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Highlights that well-functioning tax systems and national tax administrations play a key role in tax collection and that sustainable tax revenue in the Member States´ public budgets is important in the current challenging economic climate;
Amendment 128 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes note of the numerousWelcomes different tax directives since 2011 that have led to fairer, simpler and more effective corporate taxation in the EU, andbut also to a high number of tax compliance obligations on companies within the EU21 ; _________________ 21 See notably the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directives (ATAD I and ATAD II), the amendments of the Directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (DAC 1 to DAC 7), the revision of the Parent Subsidiary Directive, the EU Dispute Settlement Directive, the Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive, or the Pillar Two Directive.
Amendment 135 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Deplores the fact that in certain cases the Member States have implemented and applied tax directives in a divergent manner, which may undermininge the proper functioning of the single market and leading to misalignment in tax bases, more red tape and higher compliance costs;
Amendment 159 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to present an overall evaluation of actions taken on corporate taxation since 2011 and to immediatelywith the aim to ease the burden on businesses by invoking a regulatory moratorium and to delaying those tax acts that would unnecessarily increase costs for businesses already under strain; calls on the Commission to carry out competitiveness checks for new legislative tax proposals, as requested by the European Council for all new proposals on 22 March 2023;
Amendment 162 #
2022/2146(INI)
7. Calls on the Commission to present an overall evaluation of actions taken on corporate taxation since 2011 and to immediately ease the burden on businesses by invoking a regulatory moratorium and delaying those tax acts that would unnecessarily increase costs for businesses already under strain; calls on the Commission to carry out competitiveness checks for new legislative tax proposals, as requested by the European Council for all new proposals on 22 March 2023, and to ensure that the submission of any new proposal, if necessary, is essential for the smooth functioning of the single market ;
Amendment 173 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Takes note of the renewed debate on tax incentives following the US Inflation Reduction Act; calls on the Commission to allow fornalyse experimentation with tax credits; insists, nevertheless, that all decisions should be taken in a coordinated manner to preserve the functioning of the single market;
Amendment 180 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Member States to consider engageing in policies of full expensing for capital investments and to make capital allowance provisions permanent in order to improve real investments and to assist Europe’s competitiveness;
Amendment 195 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Takes note ofWelcomes the two-pillar solution reached at the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on the allocation of taxing rights and the application of a minimum effective tax rate of 15 % on the global profits of MNEs; welcomes the adoption of the Pillar Two Directive implementing the international agreement in the EU law;
Amendment 208 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Observes that, in addition to coping with a volatile business environment and an increasing number of EU tax directives, companies are focusing their financial and human resources on applying the Pillar Two rules; calls on the Commissioninvites the Commission to assess effectiveness and impact of the Pillar Two rules, namely in the context of expected aims, cost-benefits analysis, fight against tax evasion and avoidance, fair tax competition and higher tax revenue, and thus to give companies breathing space and enough time to prepare for the possible new BEFIT rules;
Amendment 227 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to guidesuggest measures for all the Member States towards a simplified tax system to reduce the administrative burden for companies, especially SMEs; acknowledges that simplifying refund procedures, deductions and litigation are other solutions to reduce the administrative burden, especially for SMEs;
Amendment 231 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Welcomes that the EU has developed peer review procedures within the Code of Conduct Group for business taxation; underlines that in this framework Member States re-examine, amend or abolish their existing tax measures that constitute harmful tax competition, as well as refrain from introducing new ones in the future; welcomes in this regard the 2022 Council agreement to broaden the scope of the tax measures under scrutiny when examining harmful tax practices within the EU;
Amendment 239 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. WelcomNotes the Commission’s plan to work on a BEFIT proposal, expected in the third quarter of 2023, with a view to designing a new and single EU corporate tax rulebook, based on a fair, comprehensive and effective formulary apportionment and a common tax base of income taxation for businesses, which will provide clarity and predictability for companies and the intention to provide clarity and predictability for companies, especially those operating cross-border; stresses that any such proposal must not over-step or undermine agreements reached or discussions ongoing at the global level; reiterates that agreements on corporate tax frameworks are most effective when reached at a global level;
Amendment 241 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to work on a BEFIT proposal, expected in the third quarter of 2023, with a view to designing a new and single EU corporate tax rulebook, based on a fair, comprehensive and effective formulary apportionment and a common tax base of income taxation for businesses, which wil. In this context, calls on the Commission to ensure that the new proposal provides clarity and predictability for companies;
Amendment 249 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Reiterates its consideration that the BEFIT initiative should be supported by the political process in building political support for change, including consideration of next steps in the absence of such political support, and that the initiative shouldmust be accompanied by a thorough impact assessment;
Amendment 256 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Takes note of the intended BEFIT objectives, as addressed in the Commission’s call for evidence for an impact assessment, to increase businesses’ resilience by reducing the complexity of tax rules and the compliance costs faced by EU businesses with cross-border operations, to remove obstacles to cross- border investment and make the single market a more attractive location for international investment, to create an environment conducive to fair and sustainable growth by paving the way for administrative simplification, and to provide sustainable tax revenue for the national budgets of the EU Member States, which is particularly important in the current challenging economic climate;
Amendment 274 #
2022/2146(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Takes note of the Commission proposal of 11 May 2022 addressing the debt-equity bias; deplores and the Council decision of 6 December 2022 to suspend the examination of the proposal; calls on the Council to relaunchassess negotiations on this proposal; within a broader context after other proposals in the area of corporate income taxation announced by the Commission have been put forward ;
Amendment 6 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that taxation is one of the few areas that remain subject to unanimity voting in Council; stresses that it has become increasingly evident over recent years that stronger coordination in the field of taxation is needed at EU and global levels in the light of economic developments and the new challenges created by digitalisation and globalisation; regrets, in this regard, Hungary’s misuse of its veto right to block the Council negotiations on the Commission proposal of 22 December 2021 for a Council directive on ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational groups in the Union (COM(2021)0823);
Amendment 17 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets the fact that the current situation oftencould in some cases leads to delays and a lack of progress in the harmonisation and coordination of tax rules across the Union, even though such harmonisation and coordination wcould benefit everyone; notes that some legislative proposals, such as the debt-equity bias reduction allowance (DEBRA) or the Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT), will be key to supporting the competitiveness of European companies;
Amendment 30 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Article 48(7) of the Treaty on European Union provides for two general passerelle clauses that allow the decision-making procedures to be changed in order to adopt measures in Council through qualified majority voting (QMV) in areas that are currently subject to unanimity; regretnotes the fact that these passerelle clauses have never been used; recalls that activating the passerelle clauses would in any case require unanimity in the European Council and Parliament’s consent;
Amendment 41 #
2022/2142(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. RecommendsSuggests further analysis of using the two general passerelle clauses for selected Treaty articles concerning the EU’s competences in the area of taxation; recalls that the Commission communication of 15 January 2019 entitled ‘Towards a more efficient and democratic decision making in EU tax policy’ (COM(2019)0008) and the conclusions of the Conference on the Future of Europe both recommended moving from unanimity voting to QMV on tax matters.
Amendment 3 #
2022/2104(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Highlights that the swift authorisation of sustainable feed additives and sustainable alternatives to pesticides plays an important role in reaching the ambitions of the Farm-to-Fork strategy; Stresses in that regard that sufficient capacity in terms of staff and their respective expertise is essential in order to prevent delays in application and assessment procedures for the approval of sustainable feed additives and sustainable alternatives to pesticides;
Amendment 166 #
2022/2080(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Is deeply disappointed by the failure of finance ministers to adopt the much-needed reform of the Code of Conduct for Business Taxation on 7 December 2021, after several unsuccessful attempts; condemns Hungary and Estonia, in particular, for blocking the reformalls in particular on the member states who continue, blocking the reform to lift their reservations;
Amendment 5 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Whereas to reach climate neutrality requires to attain neutrality in the land sector as well as to reduce GHG emissions of the agriculture sector; Welcomes the launch of the carbon farming initiative as announced in the Farm to Fork strategy and the new EU forest strategy, with the aim of achieving climate neutrality by 2050 as enshrined in the European Climate Law, and by 2035 in the entire land sector;
Amendment 14 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses that the agricultural and forestry sectors can play a significant role in this process, given that they have the capacity to remove and store carbon through carbon reservoir use and management; underlines that the agricultural and forestry sector contribute to the overall EU goal to be the first climate-neutral continent;
Amendment 21 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the importance of carbon farming as a new business model for EU agriculture with a view to allowing the sector’s active contribution to the green transition to provide new sources of market based income and business development opportunities;, especially for rural and remote areas, for land managers active in crops and livestock productions as well as forests; stresses that carbon farming must be market based in the long run and not rely solely on public funding
Amendment 23 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the importance of carbon farming as a new business model for EU agriculture which should be additional and voluntary, and which aims to upscale climate mitigation by paying farmers to implement climate-friendly farm or forest management practices, with a view to allowing the sector’s active contribution to the green transition toby provideing new sources of income and business development opportunities;
Amendment 39 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses the need for a broader understanding of carbon farming entailing farm practices such as manure management and innovative feed additives as enshrined in the Farm to Fork Strategy and the Methane Strategy.
Amendment 44 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Considers that carbon farming should be developed on the basis of a credible, fair, efficient and simple policy framework and sees this as a precondition for its success
Amendment 45 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. stresses the importance, in this context, of public money only being used for research, knowledge transfer and training for farmers;
Amendment 47 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need for Member States and private certifications to establish incentives at the level of land managers, especially farmers and, foresters and cooperatives, to accelerate the uptake of carbon farming by setting up ecosystem services payments under public funding as well as allowing the various benefits of the carbon removal certification for private funding;
Amendment 53 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need for Member States to establish new incentives at the level of land managers, especially farmers and foresters, to accelerate the uptake of carbon farming;
Amendment 56 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that carbon-farming incentives can take different forms, action-based, result-based or a combination of both; acknowledges the challenges, and limitations of the different schemes and believes in the complementarity of the different systems based on holdings and territorial specificities;
Amendment 58 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Underlines the requirement to take into account preliminary work on this issue, Member States’ different starting points and conditions, and the effects of climate change on carbon when evaluating climate change mitigation practices;
Amendment 60 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Believes that the planned revision of State aid guidelines should reflect the policy objectives of the European Green Deal and aim at reinforcing and simplifying investment in sustainable solutions;
Amendment 66 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the fact that carbon farming practices provide additional environmental co-benefits, such as improved biodiversity, enhanced ecosystem services and the increased resilience of EU agriculture; these practices include mixed farming, catch and cover crops, conversion back to permanent grassland and restoration of peatlands as well as sustainable forest management and agroforestry;
Amendment 68 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls the fact that carbon farming practices provide additional environmental co-benefits, such as reducing GHG emissions through land use and farm practices that can sequester carbon in natural sinks, improved biodiversity, enhanced ecosystem services and the increased resilience of EU agriculture;
Amendment 80 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of maintaining consistency in all measures within EU policies, notably the common agriculture policy (CAP), to ensure that enabling conditions are created for the upscaling of carbon farming and to allow equal access for all farmers and foresters across Member states; this notably includes the integration of carbon farming into CAP National Strategic Plans (NSP) in line with Member states assessment and needs to ensure that local natural conditions are adequately reflected, including innovative practices in crop and livestock production such as in animal nutrition and animal welfare;
Amendment 87 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that carbon farming must be regulated in line with the current CAP and be seen as a complementary and additional topping-up option; underlines, however, that in the longer term carbon farming should be market-based;
Amendment 89 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. stresses the importance of additional funds outside the CAP for a successful carbon farming initiative;
Amendment 91 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of creating new financial incentives in addition to CAP funds into stimulatinge action on emissions reductions by providing funding to improve knowledge and cooperation among land managers in terms of carbon removals by natural sinks and technological solutions;
Amendment 93 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the importance of CAP funds in stimulating action on emissions reductions by providing funding to improve knowledge and cooperation among land managers and to support the upscaling of carbon farming by covering additional costs to monitor, reporting and verification (MRV) aspects;
Amendment 101 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Stresses that financial incentives should come primarily from private sources, and reward land managers for their management practice or the actual amount of carbon sequestered, or for increasing the storage of atmospheric carbon; underlines that public funding under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other Union programs, such as the LIFE programme, the Cohesion Fund, the Horizon Europe programme, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, the Just Transition Fund, can already support carbon sequestering and biodiversity-friendly approaches in forests and agricultural lands and should be increased and coherent with the EU CAP's food security;
Amendment 104 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Is of the opinion that the success of carbon farming will be the result of both appropriate supports by various EU funds dedicated to agriculture and climate and private remuneration.
Amendment 106 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Amendment 112 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the commitment to ensure transparency and accountability by establishing a robust science-based EU regulatory framework for the accounting and certification of additional carbon removals as a key condition to ensure market-based uptake of carbon removal solutions also in the agriculture sector while safeguarding EU public funds;
Amendment 116 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Underlines that the new certification framework for carbon farming should be as simple as possible in its design and not result in disproportionate administrative burdens for land and forestry managers and owners; emphasises that the future Union certification framework will need to take into account already existing national and private initiatives with the same objective provided that they qualify in line with the required criteria;
Amendment 121 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. stresses the need for a credible certification system for the quantification and certification of carbon removals that can be applied at farm level and that avoids greenwashing and carbon leakage; underlines the need to promote high- quality carbon certificates that can ensure the achievement of the criteria of additionality, permanence, no double counting, sustainability and authenticity to ensure credibility and prevent fraudulent payments and to incentivise improved land management practices, thus resulting in enhanced carbon capture;
Amendment 129 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the establishment of a robust methodology allowing the objective measurement and certification of additional carbon removals compared to common practice among sectors in order to create harmonised bases for the calculation, capture, use and storage of carbon dioxide; by standardising methodologies and rules for monitoring, reporting and verifying (MRV) in relation to gains, or losses, in carbon sequestering; stresses private certifications schemes need to be able to adapt to local conditions and take in to account the different nature types and common practice over EU;
Amendment 130 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the establishment of a robust methodology allowingthat ensures that the resources invested in carbon farming reaches farmers and foresters, includes also their emissions reduction, does not allow for speculative trading and allows the objective measurement and certification of carbon removals among sectors in order to create harmonised bases for the calculation, capture, use and storage of carbon dioxide;
Amendment 132 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the establishment of a robust methodology allowing the objective measurement and globally compatible certification of carbon removals among sectors in order to create harmonised bases for the calculation, capture, use and storage of carbon dioxide; highlights the importance of increased funding on the innovations and research from that light in EU programs;
Amendment 143 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Believes that emissions reductions from agricultural activity should also benefit from objective measurement and certification;
Amendment 145 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Underlines the importance of creating a robust governance structure that instils trust by defining harmonised rules across EU Member States and preferably beyond, accredits validators and verifiers of carbon removals and emission reductions, operates a removal registry to avoid double counting, and ensures transparency.
Amendment 149 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers, that addressing the knowledge gap, especially among farmers and foresters, is essential for creating an efficient certification framework for carbon removals via carbon farming; calls on the Member States to boost knowledge transfers through targeted training and education programmes and access to dedicated advisory and extension services to increase the uptake of carbon farming by land managers, farmers and foresters; in this regard, calls on Member States to ring-fence appropriate amounts of resources for Advisory and Technical assistance in their Rural Development Plans 2023-2027 accordingly.
Amendment 153 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Believes that collective and cooperative approaches, shared training on-farm, soil sampling and analysis, transaction costs, investment on new machinery, measurements, and verifications costs of MRV tools that would upscale carbon farming among land managers particularly in result- based carbon farming schemes;
Amendment 157 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. welcomes all actions undertaken by the Member States that enhances knowledge through science and on-field- research activities;
Amendment 158 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Amendment 159 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Emphasises the importance of establishing a results-based carbon farming policy that is inclusive to all farmers, allows them access to the necessary climate smart tools and practices, enables them to implement the integrated cropping systems and delivers the desired climate mitigation performance together with other co- benefits;
Amendment 160 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Asks the Commission to engage with private actors, in particular retail and food processing industries, to make sure that the certification scheme triggers a price premium on the market, which would reward front runners and newcomers on an equal footing;
Amendment 164 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the role of Bio-Energy Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) through the combustion or fermentation of biogenic carbon, with the aim of providing funding under the CAP tools as an additional means of removing carbon from the atmosphere; stresses also the role of BECCS when it comes to additional removal of carbon from bioenergy, creating truly negative emissions;
Amendment 166 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the role of Bio-Energy Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) through the combustion or fermentation of biogenic carbon, with the aim of providing funding under the CAP tools as an additional means of removing carbon from the atmosphere; notes that the functional carbon market will create need for better technology and innovations in BECCS practices;
Amendment 170 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for the use of innovative bio- based products to be incentivised, including, if relevant, through appropriately amending the relevant EU legislative framework; The European carbon farming model should cover relevant bio-based products and innovative products, also made from by- products and residues, where there is a scientifically proven, genuine and verifiable carbon sequestration effect.
Amendment 178 #
2022/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls for advisory services in agriculture, such as the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS), to make a decisive contribution in supporting sustainable carbon practices and to ensure easy access for farmers to this information;
Amendment 260 #
2022/2053(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Considers that carbon farming should be developed on the basis of a credible, fair, efficient and simple policy framework and sees this as a precondition for its success;
Amendment 308 #
2022/2053(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that carbon farming must be regulated in line with the current CAP and be seen as a complementary and additional topping-up option; underlines, however, that in the longer term carbon farming should be market-basede importance of maintaining consistency in all measures within EU policies, notably the CAP, to ensure that enabling conditions are created for the upscaling of carbon farming and to allow equal access for all farmers and foresters across Member states; calls for the integration of carbon farming into CAP National Strategic Plans (NSP) in line with Member States assessment and needs, to ensure that local natural conditions are adequately reflected, including innovative practices in crop and livestock production such as in animal nutrition and animal welfare;
Amendment 322 #
2022/2053(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers that addressing the knowledge gap, especially among farmers and foresters, is essential for creating an efficient certification framework for carbon removals via carbon farming; calls on the Member States to boost knowledge transfers through targeted training and education programmes, and access to dedicated advisory and extension services to increase the uptake of carbon farming by land managers, farmers and foresters; in this regard, recalls on Member States to ring-fence appropriate amount of resources for Advisory and Technical assistance in their Rural Development Plans 2023-2027 accordingly;
Amendment 424 #
2022/2053(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that emissions reductions from agricultural activity should also benefit from objective measurement and certification;
Amendment 432 #
2022/2053(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Asks the Commission to engage with private actors, in particular retails and food processing industries, to make sure that the certification scheme triggers a price premium on the market, which would reward front runners and newcomers on an equal footing;
Amendment 76 #
2022/2051(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the numerousNotes the impediments to essentialsome EU tax initiatives over the past decades; calls for gradual change that would allow QMV infurther analysis of certain tax questions;
Amendment 15 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out the importance of information and awareness campaigns for the reduction of unintentional errors; calls on the Member States to organise such campaigns timely and involve all relevant stakeholders.
Amendment 16 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Welcomes in this regard the provision established in the Regulation (EU) No 2021/2116 that give the CAP beneficiaries possibility to retroactively correct errors in their aid application that were done in good faith and similarly welcomes the early awareness mechanism that points out to CAP beneficiaries minor non-compliance without deducting any payments at first.
Amendment 18 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Stresses the simplifications and streamlining on the penalties for non- compliance that make a clear distinction between cases of intentional and non- intentional non-compliance and sets the penalties at lower level for the latter.
Amendment 26 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that the Commission plays a supervisory role, ensuring that the arrangements governing the management and control system are compliant by, among others, verifying the effective functioning of this system and making financial corrections, where necessary.
Amendment 41 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Member States to do their utmost to guarantee sound financial management, further reduction of errors and to avoid any delays in the implementation of CAP;
Amendment 46 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Acknowledges that the strategies of fraudsters are constantly evolving to evade detection; underlines, therefore, the importance of regular analysis of the effectiveness of measures taken to combat fraud in order to ensure consistently high standards and effectiveness;
Amendment 47 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Encourages Member States to evaluate regularly their audit practices and internal control systems for EU funds under shared management to ensure that they are reliable and function effectively in preventing, detecting and correcting irregularities, including new forms of irregular practises;
Amendment 49 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that digitalisation and the adoption of more sophisticated IT tools could improve the efficiency of the assurance process; supports the extension of the use of the risk-scoring tool Arachne.; recalls that ARACHNE is not yet fully fit for purpose for all CAP interventions and that the Commission will present in 2025 a report assessing its use and interoperability with the different national systems with a view to potentially broadening its use by the Member States;
Amendment 54 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Underlines that the digitalization offers various opportunities when it comes to the management and control of Union’s policies and programmes and in particular in conducting audits; calls on the Member States, the Commission and all relevant authorities to take advantage of new IT tools and techniques to increase the reliability of audits and controls.
Amendment 61 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Invites the EPPO, OLAF, the Commission, ECA and the Member States to strengthen their cooperation, including by, for example, creating more training programmes on the use of e-tools and audit practices, as well as on how to improve them.
Amendment 64 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Welcomes the Commission’s “EU Budget Focused on Results” strategy aimed at to improve efficiency of spending and achieve more with the available resources.
Amendment 65 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 e (new)
Paragraph 8 e (new)
8e. Calls on the Commission to continue its efforts in the field of simplification of EU funding, especially with regard to reducing the burden of implementation and management of EU- funded projects;
Amendment 66 #
2022/2020(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 f (new)
Paragraph 8 f (new)
8f. Reiterates that the creation of an integrated, interoperable and harmonised system to collect, monitor and analyse information about final beneficiaries in all Member States can help to further enhance the protection of Union finances and enable even closer scrutiny;
Amendment 15 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
Citation 12 a (new)
Amendment 18 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
Citation 21 a (new)
— having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 08/12/2021 on the report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘New EU Forest Strategy for 2030"’,
Amendment 20 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 b (new)
Citation 21 b (new)
— having regard to the number of projects and practices to coordinate forest information in Europe (European National Forest Inventory Network (ENFIN), FUTMON project, DIABOLO project, European Atlas of Forest Tree Species Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) programme),
Amendment 50 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the TFEU makes no reference to a common EU forest policy; whereas Article 4 TFEU provides for a shared competence on environmental policy; whereas due to the specific diversity of the EU’s forests with regard to bio-geography, structure, size, biodiversity and ownership patterns, where environmental, climate and other relevant policy touches upon forests, it is necessary to duly apply the principle of subsidiarity and proportionality in the development and implementation of the new EU forest strategy (the strategy) and relevant EU legislation;
Amendment 58 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas forests provide a wide array of ecosystem services, such as the provision of wood, non-wood products and food, carbon sequestration, shelter for biodiversity, clean air and water, benefits for local climate, protection against natural hazards like avalanches, flooding or rockfall, as well as recreational, cultural and historic value; whereas sustainable forest management seeks a balanced provision of the various ecosystem services and to support climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts;
Amendment 61 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas the INTEGRATE network is a platform of representatives of different European countries, accompanied by scientific advice, initiated by several Member State governments and supported by the Commission’s Standing Forestry Committee and has served to- date as an important driver of identifying means to integrate nature conservation in sustainable forest management; whereas the platform’s work has played an important role in the exchange of experiences and best practices;
Amendment 63 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
C c. whereas the Horizon 2020 funded ALTERFOR project considered the potential to optimise forest management methods currently in use and presented alternative forest management models with opportunities and challenges listed for each alternative;
Amendment 64 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C d (new)
Recital C d (new)
Amendment 65 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C e (new)
Recital C e (new)
C e. whereas wood-based products contribute to climate change mitigation by storing carbon and substituting products with a large carbon footprint, including building- and packaging materials, textiles, chemicals and fuels; whereas wood-based products are renewable and to a large extend recyclable and as such have a huge potential to support a circular bioeconomy; whereas this makes the forestry sector and the forest-based industries key actors in a green economy;
Amendment 66 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C f (new)
Recital C f (new)
C f. whereas the provision of the various forest ecosystem services through the forestry sector and the forest-based industries is an important pillar of income and employment particularly in rural areas, but also in urban areas through downstream uses; whereas the implementation of the strategy should pay due attention to the development of income and employment, but also to attractiveness of employment in the sector, safety of work and the continuous development of adequate training opportunities for managers and workers;
Amendment 67 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C g (new)
Recital C g (new)
C g. whereas forest ownership across Europe is diverse in terms of size and ownership structure, including various forms of private and public ownership, leading to a great diversity of management models; whereas it is important that measures under the strategy take due account of the specific conditions and needs, as well as the protection of property rights and free enterprise in order to be effective;
Amendment 74 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas about 60 % of the EU’s forests are owned by 16 million private forest owners1a, of whom a significant share are small-holders1b; whereas involving and motivating these owners through a comprehensive policy and legislative framework, based on the recognition of their property rights, experience as managers and specific challenges, will be key to achieving the strategy’s targets, including the provision of climate and other ecosystem services; _________________ 1a Commission communication of 16 July 2021 on the “New EU Forest Strategy for 2030” (COM(2021) 572). 1b Europe: a majority of private holdings are up to 10 ha, FOREST EUROPE report on the “State of Europe’s Forests 2020” of 2020; DE: 50% of privately owned forest smaller than 20 ha, https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downlo ads/DE/Broschueren/bundeswaldinventur 3.pdf;jsessionid=972A5297B9463D98948 E787D1AA78F19.live921?__blob=public ationFile&v=3; FR: about 2/3 of private owners have less than 1 ha, https://franceboisforet.fr/wp- content/uploads/2021/04/Brochure_chiffr esClesForetPrivee_2021_PageApage_BD. pdf; FI: about 45% of owners have less than 10 ha, https://www.luke.fi/en/natural- resources/forest/forest-resources-and- forest-planning/forest-ownership/; LV: 50 % of owners have less than 5 ha, https://www.zm.gov.lv/public/ck/files/MA F_parskats_Silava_privat_meza_apsaimn _monitorings.pdf
Amendment 97 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas in order to deliver on the multiple forest functions including various benefits provided by products of the forest-based industries in an increasingly complex environment, the collection and maintenance of transparent and reliable high-quality data, the exchange of knowledge and best practices, as well as adequately funded and well-coordinated research are of central importance to meet the challenges and yield opportunities;
Amendment 110 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E d (new)
Recital E d (new)
E d. whereas on international level, the FAO is the main forum for the development of internationally agreed definitions on forests and forestry; whereas the FAO collects and provides data on forests and forestry; whereas the European Commission and Member States contribute to the work of the FAO;
Amendment 119 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E f (new)
Recital E f (new)
E f. whereas the legitimate sanctions imposed on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine raise the question of the EU’s dependency on timber imports from Russia; whereas while the EU sources about 80 % of its demand for timber domestically, imports from Russia only account for about 2 % of total consumption; whereas Finland and Sweden are the EU’s major importers of unprocessed roundwood and will be affected by trade bans1a; _________________ 1a https://www.wur.nl/en/research- results/research-institutes/environmental- research/show-wenr/does-the-eu-depend- on-russia-for-its-wood.htm.
Amendment 131 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the new EU forest strategy and its ambition to increase the balanced contribution of multi-functional forests to the targets of the Green Deal and of achieving a circular economy and climate neutrality by 2050; highlight the importance of an balanced and solid scientific based strategy and vision for the forest-based sector, considering all three dimensions of sustainability in an integrated and balanced way;
Amendment 138 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Regrets that the new EU Forest Strategy was not properly developed together with the European Parliament, Member States and stakeholders and that the positions of the co-legislators were not adequately taken into account, stresses the importance of strengthen co-operation in terms of implementing the New EU Forest Strategy for 2030;
Amendment 150 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that the maintenance and, protection and sustainable use of healthy and resilient forests is a fundamental goal of all actors in forestry and the forest-based value chain, as well a key priority for people in the EU;
Amendment 156 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recognises the vital role played by forests in contributing to the health of the environment, provision of clean air, water and soil whilst offering diverse habitats and micro-habitats to many species supporting diverse biodiversity while also supporting the human economy, recreation and culture;
Amendment 171 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the EU’s forests are characterised by diverse natural conditions, such as biogeography, size, structure and biodiversity, as well as in ownership patterns, forms of governance, challenges and opportunities, and that they have been formed by centuries of human intervention and management; stresses that in implementation all types of forests and situations require differing approaches in terms of forest management and the delivery of ecosystem services;
Amendment 178 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses that forest policy falls firmly within the national competence of Member States, and therefore details related to forest management need to be adjusted at national and regional level with a bottom up approach whereby sustainable forest management happens most effectively through the use of best knowledge of local natural conditions;
Amendment 186 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises the complexity of assessing the state of forests, as well as the uneven availability and quality of data and therefore stresses the need for continuous policy and scientific dialogue at all levels to improve data collection and harmonisation where appropriate;
Amendment 212 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recognises the key role of forests in protecting the climate and biodiversity; underlines that the multi-functional role of forests comprises multiple socioeconomic functions, such as the provision of renewable raw materials, which leads to jobs and economic growth in rural and urban areas, the provision of clean water and air, protection against natural hazards and recreational value; stresses that the implementation of the strategy must ensure a balanced provision of all services and maintain and enhance competitiveness and innovation; underlines that the successful provision of services requires sustainable active management;
Amendment 217 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Believes that the key principle of balancing multiple forest functions and of defining goals and measures towards the achievement of all ecosystem services should be to seek maximising synergies and minimising trade-offs built on evidence-based information;
Amendment 233 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights that for wood-based products to contribute optimally to climate change mitigation and a circular economy requires that they be used in the most efficient and sustainable way; believstresses that the cascading principall sustainable wood-based materials and products play an important role8 is a good guideline for efficient use, but must not use a static approach and therefore must be adjusted regularly to reflect innovative usesn the green transition, independently of their lifespans; recalls that long-and short-lived products are produced simultaneously as the whole tree is used in are source efficient way and underline that EU legislation should not define the end-use of raw materials, or set up or define a cascading principle; stresses that a well- functioning, un- distorted market incentivises the efficient use of wood- based resources; _________________ 8 As outlined in the Commission’s ‘Guidance on cascading use of biomass with selected good practice examples on woody biomass’.
Amendment 253 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the importance of a reliable supply of wood, wood-based products and forest-based biomass to achieve the EU’s sustainability goals, including the green growth and jobs goal of the Green Deal, and notes that the demand is expected to continue to grow1a; believes that the EU’s forestry sector provide some of the most sustainably sourced raw materials; calls on the Commission to consider displacement effects and effects on competitiveness of the forestry sector and the forest-based industries, as well as to monitor any effects on the availability of wood following the implementation of measures under the strategy; _________________ 1a Hetemäki, L., Palahí, M. and Nasi, R. 2020. Seeing the wood in the forests. Knowledge to Action 01, European Forest Institute. ttps://doi.org/10.36333/k2a01; also see WWF Living Forests Report, Chapter 5, https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/ forests_practice/forest_publications_news _and_reports/living_forests_report/.
Amendment 263 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Amendment 265 #
2022/2016(INI)
12. Recalls that 2.1 million people work in the forest-based sector, while the extended forest-based value chain supports 4 million jobs in the green economy1a; calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor and assess the effects of a shift in the balance of forest functions on the overall employment situation; , in rural areas as well as in down-stream parts of the wood-processing industries, and highlights the need to maintain or improve the attractiveness of employment in the sector as well as work-place safety when considering changes in management practices; _________________ 1a Commission communication of 16 July 2021 on the “New EU Forest Strategy for 2030” (COM(2021) 572).
Amendment 286 #
2022/2016(INI)
13. Takes note of the Commission’s announcement on developing additional voluntary indicators and threshold values for sustainable forest management which shall remain voluntary for Member States to implement at national and regional level; underlines the need to align the Commission’s work with that of FOREST EUROPE and the Food and Agriculture Organization, as well as to engage with the Member States to ensure that indicators and value ranges are fit-for-purpose for their application at the local level under specific bio-geographic conditions;
Amendment 295 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights that pressure on forests from natural disasters and other disturbances is being increasingly intensified by climate change and that strengthening forests’ resilience is a matter of urgency and underline that that in order to create more resilient forests, forests needs to be managed by adapting them to a changing climate and emphasis that as forests are biologically very complex, it is not possible to make general claims about, for example, even-aged forests being worse off in relation to climate change than uneven-aged ones; notes the role that restoration and afforestation can play in strengthening resilience and enhancing biodiversity; notes that sustainable forest management consists of a broad array of actions and adaptive practices, many of which can play a key role in climate mitigation; stresses that adaptive forest management is site- specific and acknowledges that varying forest conditions and forest types require different management regimes and that practices should be decided nationally, regionally or locally;
Amendment 296 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights that pressure on forests from natural disasters and other disturbances is being increasingly intensified by climate change and that strengthening forests’ resilience and adaptation is a matter of urgency; notes the role that restoration and afforestation can play in strengthening resilience and enhancing biodiversity; notes that sustainable forest management as a dynamic concept consists of a broad array of actions and adaptive practices, many of which can play a key role in the climate mitigation potential of forests as well as offering measures, such as introducing better adapted species and provenances, strengthening forests’ contributions to the water cycle, sanitary fellings to contain pests, pathogens and invasive species, forest fire prevention and maintenance of protective functions, whilst underpinning their multifaceted nature and other roles;
Amendment 309 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Emphasises that in many cases, forest protection requires sustainable active management, as unmanaged forests more likely suffer from disturbances such as forest fires, pests and other damage; underlines that this includes enhancing biodiversity;
Amendment 323 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 327 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Takes note of the ongoing work on guidance for ‘closer-to-nature’ forestry by the Working Group on Forests and Nature; believes that to ensure added value, guidance on this concept should incorporate results-oriented, scientifically and locally proven sustainable forest management practices to give managers the tools to yield connections and cooperation on better integrating biodiversity protection with improved management practices; highlights that forests do have very different characteristics within the Union and therefore there is a strong need for different policy and management approaches;
Amendment 337 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Reiterates its call for the protection of primary and old-growth forests and stresses the need to create a definition for what constitutes old-growth forests; welcomes the ongoing work of the Working Group on Forests and Nature and underlines the need to consider a diverse set of attributes and ensure flexibility to account for specific conditions in bio- geographic regions and forest types; stresses that the definitions must consider the diversity of European forests, owners, management traditions and nature types and our shifting climatic zones, as well as not setting disproportionate burden on management of forests and adjacent forest, e.g. by requiring disproportionally large buffer strips or by forbid certain management measures related to issues such as disaster prevention;
Amendment 345 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Reiterates its call for the protection of primary and old-growth forests and stresses the need to create a definitioncommon agreed understanding between Member States and all other stakeholders for what constitutes old-growth forests; welcomes the ongoing work of the Working Group on Forests and Nature and underlines the need to consider a diverse set of attributes and ensure flexibility to account for specific conditions in bio- geographic regions and forest types;
Amendment 350 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Welcomes the re- and afforestation roadmap for planting at least 3 billion additional trees in the EU by 2030; stresses that definitions of friendly re- and afforestation must consider the diversity of European forests, owners, management traditions and nature types, as well as our shifting climatic zones, and be set in close cooperation with Member States and relevant stakeholders;
Amendment 352 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Welcomes the initiative to plant 3 billion additional trees by 2030 and particularly the principle of planting the right tree in the right place for the right purpose; underlines that attention should be given to avoiding to put additional pressure on the availability of agricultural land;
Amendment 388 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that the European agricultural fund for rural development is the main source of support for forestry measures; further notes that between 2014 and 2020, Member States only spent 49 % of the available funds, and that the Commission has identified administrative burden, insufficient attractiveness of the premiums and a lack of advisory services as reasons for this low usage; underlines that support to voluntary nature conservation measurement by forest owners achieves several objectives, such as biodiversity preservation, preservation of the carbon stock and habitat conservation, while being in line with the ownerships right and subsidiarity principle;
Amendment 405 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Points out that the forestry sector unlike the agricultural sector operates primarily as a market-based sector and without a distinct dependency on subsidies; stresses that putting a stronger emphasis on other ecosystem services should not lead to an increased dependency on subsidies and encourages the Commission and Member States to further pursue the development of market-based payment for ecosystem services schemes, such as carbon farming;
Amendment 408 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Welcomes the work undertaken by the Horizon 2020 funded SINCERE project in developing new business models for the provision of enhanced ecosystem services and believes lessons learned from this and similar projects will give valuable guidance on the development of payment for ecosystem services schemes; underlines the importance of applying the principle of additionality and of designing programmes in a way that rewards front- runners; further underlines that specific requirements of programmes need to take into account the wide variety of forests and their diverse challenges and opportunities; notes that the availability of reliable data on ecosystem services is a prerequisite for any payment scheme;
Amendment 410 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 415 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Acknowledges the important role and contribution of existing certification schemes to the further uptake of sustainable forest management; takes note of the Commission’s announcement on developing a ‘closer-to-nature’ certification scheme; encourages the Commission to cooperate with existing and proven certification schemes to explore how this additional voluntary certification could enhance their portfolio and believes that to create added value, the certification must offer forest owners a sufficient price premium for the provision of ecosystem services;
Amendment 424 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights that to unlock the full potential of forests to contribute to climate and circular economy targets of the EU, further research and development in the field of bio-based alternatives to fossil-based products are required and should be incentivised;and innovation in the fields management practices and of bio-based alternatives to fossil-based products and other products with a large carbon footprint are required and should be incentivised; notes that development cycles in the sector may last 10 years or longer and underlines that a predictable and stable regulatory environment is a precondition to attracting investments; highlights that many innovations in the sector have high added value and provide high quality employment in rural areas as well as in the wood-processing industries and underlines the role of SME in the field;
Amendment 431 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Believes that to improve the coordinated provision of environmental and economic forest services, relevant EU framework programmes must be better aligned; programmes, including Horizon Europe, LIFE, EIP-AGRI, LEADER and EIT, must be better aligned; welcomes the Commission proposal to enhance EU cooperation by proposing a Research and Innovation partnership on forestry and calls on the Commission to develop comprehensive forest-focussed programmes including different functions and parts of the forest-sector value chain and including living-labs to test and demonstrate solutions for key challenges, building on existing and proven platforms such as the INTEGRATE network, the Forest-Technology Platform and including pan-European and international partners;
Amendment 436 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses thatRecalls that 60 % of EU forests are privately owned and a significant share of forest owners are small-holders; stresses that in order to achieve the Strategy’s goals, the implementation of the strategy must focus on enabling small- holders to deliver on the multiple forest functions and calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that support programmes, payment for ecosystem services schemes and research funding are attractive and easily accessible to small-holders;
Amendment 442 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Underlines that the availability of advisory services are an important driver for the dissemination of sustainable forest management practices; encourages Member States to ensure the availability of advisory services, with particular attention to small-holders;
Amendment 443 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Underlines the importance of the forestry sector and the wood-based industries as a provider of jobs in rural communities as well as in urban areas through downstream uses and notes with concern the steady decline in employment and the high number of accidents in the sector1a; calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor the effects of measures taken under the strategy on employment and work safety and highlights the importance of making this type of employment attractive, taking measures to increase the safety of work and adequately training workers; in the light of changing management practices, considering that discussed options often go hand in hand with higher (physical) labour intensity which also bears more risks for workers, which requires high quality vocational training as well as upskilling and reskilling opportunities; highlights the importance of making this type of employment attractive, taking measures to increase the safety of work and adequately training workers; calls on Member States to assess their advisory services in this respect and re-enforce where necessary; _________________ 1a FOREST EUROPE report on the “State of Europe’s Forests 2020” of 2020.
Amendment 450 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Stresses the importance of attracting young people and women in the sector and welcomes the Commission proposals to promote the establishment of a skills partnership under the Pact for Skills and make use of the European Social Fund Plus to work together to develop quality jobs and improve working conditions, as well as to increase the number of upskilling and reskilling opportunities in forestry;
Amendment 456 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Stresses that to attract young people as well as investments to the sector and throughout the value chain, a favourable environment in rural areas including digital, transport and community infrastructure is required and calls on Member States to use available funds to support the rural development in this regard;
Amendment 461 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the importance of accurate, integrated and up-to-date data on Europe’s forests and takes note of the initiative for a legislative proposal for a framework on forest observation, reporting and data collection; underlines that the broad availability, high quality and transparency of data are preconditions to meeting the goals of the strategy and believes that to deliver added value the framework must build on existing mechanisms and processes through a bottom-up approach to best use the expertise and experience present in the Member Statessuch as the national forest inventories, the Forest Information System for Europe (FISE), the ENFIN network, FOREST EUROPE and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) through a bottom-up approach to best use the expertise and experience present in the Member States and while avoiding the duplication of work and administrative burden and costs; calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure adequate funding and human resources for operative support for the framework;
Amendment 470 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 479 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Takes note of the idea to introduce strategic plans for forests under the framework on forest observation, reporting and data collection; further notes that several Member States already have national strategies for forests in place; calls on the Commission to ensure that the legislative proposal duly acknowledges work already done at Member State level, and where relevant on local level and to assess how this tool could be used to support particularly those Member States that do not yet have national strategies in place;
Amendment 488 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Believes that due to the multi- functional contribution of forests to high- level EU goals and the different administrative levels and stakeholder groups involved, the cornerstones of the strategy’s implementation must be close cooperation and the exchange of best practices with national and regional experts, stakeholders, forest owners and managers, scientists, certification schemes and civil society; underlines that governance must take EU and Member State engagement in international processes into account; such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and FOREST EUROPE into account and that the implementation of the Strategy should seek to create synergies with the contribution to international commitments and cooperation, including on the continuous development of terminology and definitions;
Amendment 489 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. BStresses that the governance of forests and the forestry regulation are responsibilities of the Member States; believes that due to the multi- functional contribution of forests to high- level EU goals and the different administrative levels and stakeholder groups involved, the cornerstones of the strategy’s implementation must be close cooperation and the exchange of best practices with national and regional experts, stakeholders, forest managers, scientists and civil society, and fully and actually comply with the principle of subsidiarity; underlines that governance must take EU and Member State engagement in international processes into account;
Amendment 503 #
2022/2016(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Underlines that the achievement of the Strategy’s goals depends on measures that are adapted to local conditions and challenges; therefore, calls on the Commission and Member States to facilitate the exchange of best practices at all levels and to strengthen stakeholder dialogue, particularly including forest managers, science and civil society groups;
Amendment 79 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) At international level, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework28 aims at introducing greater tax transparency on crypto-assets and its reporting. Union rules should take into account the framework developed by the OECD in order to increase effectiveness of information exchange and to reduce the administrative burden. Member States should use the Commentaries on the Model Competent Authority Agreement and the Crypto- Asset Reporting Framework, developed by the OECD, in order to ensure consistent implementation and application of this Directive. __________________ 28 https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of- tax-information/crypto-asset-reporting- framework-and-amendments-to-the- common-reporting-standard.pdf
Amendment 87 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Directive applies to crypto- assets service providers regulated by and authorised under Regulation XXX and to crypto-asset operators that are not. Both are referred to as reporting crypto-asset service providers as they are required to report under this Directive. The general understanding of what constitutes crypto- assets is very broad and includes those crypto-assets that have been issued in a decentralised manner, as well as stablecoins, including e-money tokens as defined in Regulation XXX, and certain non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Crypto-assets that are used for payment or investment purposes are reportable under this Directive. Therefore, reporting crypto-asset service providers should consider on a case-by-case basis whether crypto-assets can be used for payment and investment purposes, taking into account the exemptions provided in Regulation XXX, in particular in relation to a limited network and certain utility tokens..
Amendment 94 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) It is crucial to reinforce the provisions of Directive 2011/16/EU concerning the information to be reported or exchanged to adapt to new developments of different markets and consequently effectively tackle identified conducts for tax fraud, tax avoidance and tax evasion. Those provisions should reflect the developments observed in the internal market and at international level leading to an effective reporting and exchange of information. Consequently, the Directive includes among others the latest additions to the Common Reporting Standard of the OECD, the integration of e-money and central bank digital currency provisions, a clear and harmonised framework for compliance measures, and the extension of the scope of cross-border rulings to high net worth individuals. Member States should use the Commentaries on the Model Competent Authority Agreement and the Common Reporting Standard, developed by the OECD, in order to ensure consistent implementation and application of this Directive.
Amendment 100 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) The Tax Identification Number (‘TIN’) is essential for Member States to match information received with data present in national databases. It increases Member States’ capability of identifying the relevant taxpayers and correctly assessing the related taxes. Therefore, it is important that Member States require that TIN is indicated in the context of exchanges related to financial accounts, advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing agreements, country-by-country reports, reportable cross-border arrangements, and information on sellers on digital platforms and crypto-assets. However, when the TIN is not available, such an obligation may not be fulfilled by the competent authorities of Member States .
Amendment 105 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35 a (new)
Recital 35 a (new)
(35a) Information acquired through the reporting or the exchange of information under Directive 2011/16/EU should be effectively used by each Member State. Therefore, a mechanism ensuring effective use, including risk analysis of the data, should be introduced in each Member State.
Amendment 111 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) In order to ensure compliance witha proper enforcement of the rules under theis Directive 2011/16/EU, Member States should lay down the rules on penalties, and other compliance measures that should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Each Member State should apply those rules in accordance with their national laws and the provisions set forth in this Directpplicable to infringements of national provisions on mandatory exchange of information reported by crypto-asset service providers, that should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Amendment 113 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
Amendment 116 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
Recital 41
Amendment 119 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42 a (new)
Recital 42 a (new)
(42a) Following the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-694/20, Directive 2011/16/EU should be amended in such a manner that its provisions do not have the effect of requiring a lawyer acting as an intermediary, where he or she is exempt from the reporting obligation, on account of the legal professional privilege by which he or she is bound, to notify any other intermediary who is not his or her client of that intermediary’s reporting obligations while preserving the obligation of intermediaries to notify without delay his or her client of his or her reporting obligations.
Amendment 120 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 44 a (new)
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) International data exchange for tax purposes constitutes a necessary instrument to fight tax fraud in a globalized world. Given that there is an EU-wide standard for personal data protection, uniform rules regarding exchanges with third countries and ensuring data protection in international exchanges of tax information, both by the transferring Member States and by the receiving jurisdiction, should be established.
Amendment 154 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ab – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 8ab – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
(3a) in Article 8ab, paragraph 5, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following: "5. Each Member State may take the necessary measures to give intermediaries the right to a waiver from filing information on a reportable cross-border arrangement where the reporting obligation would breach the legal professional privilege under the national law of that Member State. In such circumstances, each Member State shall take the necessary measures to require any intermediaries to notify, without delay, any othery that has been granted a waiver to notify, without delay, his or her client, if such client is an intermediary or, if there is no such intermediary, if such client is the relevant taxpayer, of their reporting obligations under paragraph 6. " Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02011L0016-20230101)
Amendment 161 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 8ad – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall not have access to information referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 3 of this Article.
Amendment 164 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8ad – paragraph 6
Article 8ad – paragraph 6
Amendment 182 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 16 – paragraph 7
Article 16 – paragraph 7
7. The competent authority of each Member State shall put in place an effective mechanism to ensure the assessmentuse of data acquired through the reporting or the exchange of information under Articles 8 to 8ad within the scope of this Directive as well as to put in place procedures for the systematic risk analysis of the data.;
Amendment 185 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 21 – paragraph 5a – subparagraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 5a – subparagraph 2
The competent authorities of all Member States shall have access to the information recorded in that directory. The Commission shall alsoOn information communicated according to Article 8ad(2) and (3), the competent authority of a Member State shall, however, have access to theonly to information recorded in that directory for the purposes of complying wiconcerning persons resident in that Member State. The Commission shall also have access to the its obligations under this Dnformation recorded in that directiveory, however with the limitations set out in Article 8a(8), Article 8ab(17) and Article 8ad(8), and only for the purpose of collecting statistics. The necessary practical arrangements shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
Amendment 191 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 23 – paragraph 3
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission a yearly assessment ofassess the effectiveness of the automatic exchange of information referred to in Articles 8 to 8ad as well as the practical results achieved, including in combatting tax evasion and tax avoidance, and shall inform the Commission once a year. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the form and the conditions of communication for that yearly assessment. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2). The Commission shall also examine and evaluate the compliance cost that can result from a possible over-reporting situation.
Amendment 197 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 24 – paragraph 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 2 a (new) and 2 b (new)
(11a) In Article 24, the following paragraphs 2a and 2b are added: "Article 24 Exchange of information with third countries 2a. The processing of personal data for the purposes of the exchange of tax relevant information with third countries, based on an international agreement, shall be deemed of public interest under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2b. In case of an automatic exchange, Member States shall ensure that the level of protection of natural persons guaranteed by Regulation (EU) 2016/679 is not undermined. "
Amendment 198 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – title
Article 25a – title
Article 25a Penalties and other compliance measures
Amendment 200 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 1
Article 25a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and concerning Article 8(3a), Articles 8aa to 8ad and shall take all necessary measures to ensure that they are implemented and enforced. Penalties and compliance measures provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Amendment 203 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 25a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member states shall introduce a temporary penalty reduction regime for SMEs.
Amendment 204 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 2
Article 25a – paragraph 2
Amendment 207 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 3
Article 25a – paragraph 3
Amendment 224 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 4
Article 25a – paragraph 4
Amendment 228 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 5
Article 25a – paragraph 5
Amendment 229 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 25a – paragraph 6
Article 25a – paragraph 6
Amendment 235 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 27c – paragraph 1
Article 27c – paragraph 1
For taxable periods starting on or after 1 January 2026, Member States shall ensure that the TIN of reported individuals or entities issued by the Member State of residence, where available, is included in the communication of the information referred to in Article 8(1) and (3a), Article 8a(6), Article 8aa(3), Article 8ab(14), Article 8ac(2) and Article 8ad(3). The TIN shall be provided even when it is not specifically required by those Articles.
Amendment 243 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section I – point A – subparagraph 1
Annex VI – Section I – point A – subparagraph 1
1. an Entity authorised under Regulation XX;in accordance with Article 63 of Regulation XXX or allowed to provide Crypto-Asset Services following a notification to a Member State in accordance with Article 60 of Regulation XXX; or not an Entity authorised by a Member State in accordance with Article 63 of Regulation XXX or allowed to provide Crypto-Asset Services following a notification to a Member State in accordance with Article 60 of Regulation XXX, and it is:
Amendment 246 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section II – point B a (new)
Annex VI – Section II – point B a (new)
Ba. Notwithstanding subparagraph A(1), the place of birth is not required to be reported unless the Reporting Crypto- Asset Service Provider is otherwise required to obtain and report it under domestic law.
Amendment 247 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section II – point C
Annex VI – Section II – point C
C. The information listed in paragraph 3 shall be reported by 31 January0 September of the calendar year following the year to which the information relates. The first information shall be reported for the relevant calendar year or other appropriate reporting period as from 1 January 2026.
Amendment 249 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section IV – point A – subparagraph 5
Annex VI – Section IV – point A – subparagraph 5
5. For the purposes of this Directive, ‘Electronic Money’ or ‘E-money’ means Electronic Money or E-money as is defined in Directive 2009/110/EC. For the purposes of this Directive, tany Crypto-Asset that is: (a) a digital representation of a single Fiat Currency; (b) issued on the receipt of funds for the purpose of making payment transactions; (c) represented by a claim on the issuer denominated in the same Fiat Currency; (d) accepted in payment by a natural or legal person other than the issuer; and (e) by virtue of regulatory requirements to which the issuer is subject, redeemable at any time and at par value for the same Fiat Currency upon request of the holder of the product. The term ‘Electronic money’ or ‘E-money’ does not include a product created for the sole purpose of facilitating the transfer of funds from a customer to another person pursuant to instructions of the customer. A product is not created for the sole purpose of facilitating the transfer of funds if, in the ordinary course of business of the transferring Entity, either the funds connected with such product are held longer than 60 days after receipt of instructions to facilitate the transfer, or, if no instructions are received, the funds connected with such product are held longer than 60 days after receipt of the funds.
Amendment 250 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section IV – point A – subparagraph 6
Annex VI – Section IV – point A – subparagraph 6
Amendment 257 #
2022/0413(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Annex III
Directive 2011/16/EU
Annex VI – Section IV – point C – point 4
Annex VI – Section IV – point C – point 4
4. ‘Reportable Retail Payment Transaction’ means a Transfer of Reportable Crypto-Assets in consideration of goods or services for a value exceeding EURUSD 50 000 (or the equivalent amount in any other currency).
Amendment 54 #
2022/0409(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) To fight VAT fraud, Member States’ Eurofisc liaison officials as referred to in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 should be able to access and analyse VAT information on intra- Community transactions. To monitor the correct application of VAT laws, Member States’ officials who check whether the exemption of VAT for certain imported goods, which is laid down in Article 143(1), point (d), of Directive 2006/112/EC, applies, should also be able to access VAT identification information that is stored in the central VIES. Moreover, for the same reasons, Member States’ competent authorities should select other officials who need to have direct access to the central VIES and grant them such access where needed. Finally, duly accredited persons of the Commission should be able to access the information contained in the central VIES, but only to the extent that such access is necessary for the development and maintenance of that system. Under any circumstances, the taxpayers´ rights to confidentality should not be violated by the accredited persons of the Commission.
Amendment 83 #
2022/0409(CNS)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation 904/2010/EU
Article 24g – paragraph 1
Article 24g – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall develop, maintain, host and technically manage an electronic, central VAT information exchange system (“central VIES”) for the purposes referred to in Article 1. Under any circumstances, the Commisison shall have no access to the data of individual tax payers.
Amendment 105 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) To facilitate the automation of the reporting process for both taxable persons and tax administrations, the transactions to be reported to tax administrations should be documented electronically. The use of electronic invoicing should become the default system for issuing invoices. Nevertheless, Member States should be allowed to authorise other means for domestic supplies. The issuance of electronic invoices by the supplier and its transmission to the customer should not be conditional on a prior authorisation or verification by the tax administration.
Amendment 111 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 124 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Several Member States have put in place divergent reporting requirements for transactions within their territories, leading to significant administrative burdens for taxable persons which operate in different Member States, as they need to adapt their accounting systems to comply with those requirements. In order to avoid the costs derived from such divergence, the systems implemented in Member States to report supplies of goods and services for consideration between taxable persons within their territory should comply with the same features of the system implemented for intra-Community transactions. Member States should provide for the electronic means for the transmission of the information and, as is the case for intra- Community transactions, it should be possible for the taxable person to submit the data in accordance with the European standard laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1870, even though the relevant Member State could provide for additional means to transmit the data. The data should be allowed to be sent by the taxable person directly or by a third party on that person’s behalf.
Amendment 127 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) Member States should not be obliged to implement a digital reporting requirement for supplies of goods and services for consideration between taxable persons within their territory. However, if they are to implement such a requirement in the future, they should align it with the digital reporting requirements for intra- Community transactions. Member States which already have a reporting system for these transactions in place should adapt such systems to ensure that the data are reported in accordance with the digital reporting requirements for intra- Community transactions.
Amendment 129 #
2022/0407(CNS)
(19) In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the intra-Community digital reporting requirements, the Commission should prepare an assessment report evaluating the impact of intra- Community digital reporting requirements on the reduction of the VAT gap and in the implementation and compliance costs for taxable persons and tax administrations, in order to verify whether the system has achieved its objectives or needs further adjustments or any extension to domestic transactions.
Amendment 131 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Member States should be able to continue to implement other measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT and to prevent evasion. However, they should not be able to impose additional reporting obligations on the transactions that are covered by the digital reporting requirements.
Amendment 142 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Amongst other measures, Directive (EU) 2017/2455 extended the scope of the Mini OSS to become a broader OSS, covering all cross-border supplies of services to non-taxable persons taking place in the Union and all intra- Community distance sales of goods. Exceptionally, electronic interfaces, such as marketplaces and platforms, which become deemed suppliers for certain supplies of goods within the Union can also declare certain domestic supplies of goods in the Union OSS scheme. To support the objective of a single VAT registration in the Union, the scope of the Union OSS scheme should be further expanded to cover other supplies of goods, including domestic business-to-consumer supplies of goods in the Union by taxable persons who are not identified for VAT purposes in the Member State of consumption, ensuring that businesses do not need to register for VAT in each Member State where such supplies of goods to consumers take place. In addition, the scope of the Union OSS scheme should be expanded to also include domestic supplies of margin scheme goods to any person, when those goods are supplied by a taxable person (taxable dealer) who is not identified in the Member State were such supplies of goods take place. This amendment would allow taxable dealers to benefit from the OSS simplifications, and allow for the VAT due on those supplies to be declared and paid in one Member State of identification via the enlarged Union OSS scheme. However, any extension of the Union OSS scheme to supplies of goods and services by a taxable person to another taxable person should be avoided.
Amendment 145 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) VAT is normally charged and accounted for by the supplier of the goods or services. However, in certain circumstances Member States may provide that, under the reverse charge mechanism, the recipient of the supply, rather than the supplier, is obliged to account for the VAT due. To further support the objective of a single VAT registration in the Union, rules should be laid down for the mandatory application by Member States of the reverse charge mechanism in situations where a supplier is not established for VAT purposes in the Member State in which VAT is due. A supplier, making supplies of goods or services to a person who is identified for VAT in the Member State where the supply is taxable, should be entitled to apply the reverse charge. For control purposes, such supplies should be reported in the recapitulative statement.
Amendment 147 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 2006/112/EC, powers should be conferred on the Commission to better secure the correct use and the verification process of IOSS VAT identification numbers for the purposes of the exemption provided for in that Directive. This empowerment should allow the Commission to adopt an implementing act to introduce special measures to prevent certain forms of tax evasion or avoidance. Such special measures involve, inter alia, linking the unique consignment number with the IOSS VAT identification number. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council71 and for this purpose the committee should be the one established by Article 58 of Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council72 . The Commission´s powers should take into account the taxpayers’ rights to confidentiality. _________________ 71 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13). 72 Council Regulation (EU) No 904/2010 of 7 October 2010 on administrative cooperation and combating fraud in the field of value added tax (OJ L 268, 12.10.2010, p. 1).
Amendment 162 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 218 – paragraph 2
Article 218 – paragraph 2
Amendment 163 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 232
Article 232
(9) Article 232 is deleted;replaced by the following: 1.The use of an electronic invoice shall be subject to acceptance by the recipient. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may provide that the use of electronic invoices issued by taxable persons established within their territory shall not be subject to the acceptance of the recipient established in their territory.’
Amendment 171 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive2006/112/EC
Article 28a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 28a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Notwithstanding Article 28, a taxable person who facilitates, through the use of an electronic interface such as a platform, portal, or similar means, the supply of short-term accommodation rental, as referred to in Article 135(3), or passenger transport by road within the Union, shall be deemed to have received and supplied those services themselves where the person providing those services is one of the following:
Amendment 183 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
1. Without prejudice to Articles 195 and 196, where the taxable supply of goods or services is carried out by a taxable person who is not establishedidentified for VAT purposes in the Member State in which the VAT is due, Member States shall allow that the taxable person liable for payment of VAT ishall be the person to whom the goods or services are supplied if that person is already identified for VAT purposes in that Member State.
Amendment 186 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 242a – paragraph 1a
Article 242a – paragraph 1a
1a. Where a taxable person facilitates, through the use of an electronic interface such as a platform, portal or similar means, the supply of short-term accommodation rental or passenger transport services by road within the Union, and that person is not considered to have received and supplied those services themselves under Article 28a, the taxable person who facilitates the supply shall be obliged to keep records of those supplies.;
Amendment 203 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 218
Article 218
For the purposes of this Directive, invoices shall be issued in a structured electronic format. However, Member States may accept documents on paper or other formats as invoices for transactions not subject to the reporting obligations laid down in Title XI Chapter 6. Member States shall allow for the issuance of electronic invoices which comply with the European standard on electronic invoicing and the list of its syntaxes pursuant to Directive 2014/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The issuance of electronic invoices by taxable persons and their transmission shall not be subject to a prior mandatory authorisation or verification by the tax authorities.;
Amendment 224 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2006/122/EC
Article 271a – paragraph 1
Article 271a – paragraph 1
1. Member States may require that taxable persons identified for VAT purposes in their territory send electronically to their tax authorities data on the supplies of goods and services made for consideration to other taxable persons within their territory and on the supplies of goods and services for consideration made to them by other taxable persons.
Amendment 225 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 2006/112/EC
Article 271a – paragraph 2
Amendment 226 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 271b – paragraph 1
Article 271b – paragraph 1
Amendment 229 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 271b – paragraph 2
Article 271b – paragraph 2
Amendment 230 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 17
Article 2006/112/EC
By 31 March 2033 at the latest the Commission shall, based on the information provided by Member States, present to the Council a report on the functioning of the domesticintra-Community reporting requirements set out in this SectionChapter. In that report, the Commission shall assess the need for further harmonisation measures, namely in relation to the domestic reporting requirements, and shall if deemed necessary, make an appropriate proposal for such measures.;
Amendment 232 #
2022/0407(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 273 – paragraph 2
Article 273 – paragraph 2
Amendment 5 #
2022/0404(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2009/65/EU
Article 52 – paragraph 1 − subparagraph 2
Article 52 – paragraph 1 − subparagraph 2
The risk exposure to a counterparty of the UCITS in a derivative or repurchase agreement transaction that is not centrally cleared through a CCP authorised in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 or recognised in accordance with Article 25 of that Regulation, shall not exceed either:;
Amendment 7 #
2022/0404(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2
Article 2
Articles 74, 76, 81, 100 and 104 Directive 2013/36/EU
[...] d e [...] l e t e d
Amendment 218 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) To ensure that clients are aware of their options and can take an informed decision as where to clear their derivative contracts, clearing members and clients that provide clearing services in both Union and recognised third-country CCPs should inform their clients about the option to clear a derivative contract in a Union CCP so that clearing in those services identified as of substantial systemic importance is reduced in Tier 2 CCPs in order to ensure the financial stability of the Union. Clearing members must respect the wishes of the clients on where to clear the clients' derivatives.
Amendment 238 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) To mitigate potential risks for the financial stability of the Union, or of one or more of its Member States, CCPs and clearing houses should not be allowed to be clearing members of other CCPs nor should CCPs be able to accept to have other CCPs as clearing members or indirect clearing members. This exclusion should not affect interoperability arrangements, or other arrangements such as cross- margining and sponsored-memberships or sponsored access, between CCPs.
Amendment 243 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50 a (new)
Recital 50 a (new)
(50a) (51) To further enhance the attractiveness of CCPs established in the Union, the opening hours of TARGET2 should be extended beyond the current constraints. This will allow clearing members established in the Union to fulfil their margin obligations in EUR, lowering the current dependency on USD for margin calls occurring beyond the closing time of TARGET2.
Amendment 255 #
Amendment 446 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e – introductory part
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7
Article 25 – paragraph 7
(e) the following paragraphs 7a, 7b, 7c and 7cd are added:
Amendment 447 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
7a. Where ESMA has not yet determined the tiering of a CCP or where ESMA has determined that all or some CCPs in a relevant third country are Tier 1 CCPs, the cooperation arrangements referred to in paragraph 7 shall take into account the risk the provision of clearing services by those CCPs entails and shall specify:
Amendment 448 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
(b) exceptionally, the mechanism for the exchange of information on a quarterly basis requiring detailed information covering the aspects referred to in paragraph 2a and in particular information on significant changes to risk models and parameters, extension of CCP activities and services and changes in the client account structure, with the aim to detect if a CCP is potentially close to becoming or is potentially likely to become systemically importantmonitor and detect risks for the financial stability of the Union or one or more of its Member States.
Amendment 449 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3 – point c (new)
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3 – point c (new)
(c a) the mechanism for prompt notification to ESMA by the third-country competent authority where a third- country CCP intends to extend and reduce its activities and services;
Amendment 451 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point f
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point f
(f) the procedures for third-country authorities to assure the effective enforcement of decisions adopted by ESMA in accordance with Articles 25f, 25k(1), point i, 25j, 25k(1)(b), 25l, 25m and 25p;
Amendment 452 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e
(e) the procedures for third-country authorities to promptly inform ESMA of the following with a focus on aspects relevant for the Union or one or more of its Member Stcooperate with ESMA when drawing up recovery plans and any subsequent changes to such plans and the procedures for third-country authorities to cooperate with ESMA when recovery plans are activates:d
Amendment 454 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i
Amendment 455 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i i
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point e – point i i
(ii) if a Tier 2 CCP intends to activate its recovery plan orthe procedures for third countries to promptly inform ESMA where the third- country authorities have determined that there are indications of an emerging crisis situation that could affect the operations of that CCP, in particular, its ability to provide clearing services or where the third-country authorities envisage to take a resolution action in the near future.
Amendment 456 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – point e a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point d
Article 25 – paragraph 7 – point d
(e a) 7d. Where ESMA has determined that at least one CCP in a relevant third country is a Tier 2 CCP, ESMA shall establish effective cooperation arrangements with the relevant resolution authority of that third country. The cooperation arrangements shall specify in relation to those Tier 2 CCPs at least the following: (a) the procedures for the third-country resolution authority to consult ESMA when drawing resolution plans and any subsequent material changes to such plans; (b) the procedures for the third-country resolution authority to inform ESMA when the resolution plan is activated and when the third-country resolution authority intends to deviate from the resolution plan.’;
Amendment 457 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25a
Article 25a
(21 a) Article 25a is replaced by the following: "Article 25a Comparable compliance 1. A CCP referred to in Article 25(2b) may submit a reasoned request that ESMA assesses whether in its compliance with the applicable third-country framework, taking into account the provisions of the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 25(6), that CCP may be deemed to satisfy compliance with the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V. ESMA shall immediately transmit the request to the third-country CCP college. 2. The reasoned request referred to in paragraph 1 shall provide the factual basis for a finding of comparability and the reasons why compliance with the requirements applicable in the third country satisfies the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V. 3. The Commission, in order to ensure that the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 effectively reflects the regulatory objectives of the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V and the Union's interests as a whole, shall adopt a delegated act specifying the following: (a) the minimum elements to be assessed for the purposes of paragraph 1of this Article; (b) the modalities and conditions to carry out the assessment. The Commission shall adopt the delegated act referred to in the first subparagraphbe submitted either within the deadline set by ESMA in the notification informing the third-country CCP that it is not considered to be a Tier 1 CCP or at any moment after a third- country CCP has been recognised by ESMA as a Tier 2 CCP in accordance with Article 25(2b). 3. The reasoned request referred to in paragraph 1 shall: (a) specify the requirements for which the Tier 2 CCP requests comparable compliance; (b) provide the factual basis for a finding of comparability and the reasons why compliance with the requirements applicable in the third country satisfies the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V; (c) specify the way in which the Tier 2 CCP complies with any conditions set out in the implementing act referred to in Article 25(6). (d) a statement from its competent authority confirming that the Tier 2 CCP is of good repute and standing; and (e) where necessary, with regard to the requirements set out in Article 16 and Title V of this Regulation, a translation of the relevant applicable third-country framework into a language commonly used in finance. 4. ESMA shall assess, within 30 working days of receipt of a reasoned request submitted in accordance with paragraph 1, whether that reasoned request is complete. ESMA shall set a deadline by which the Tier 2 CCP has to provide additional information where the request is incomplete. 5. ESMA shall assess whether the Tier 2 CCP’s compliance with the applicable third-country framework, following an outcomes-based and risk-based approach, is comparable to the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V of this Regulation. ESMA shall also take into account the supervisory outcomes achieved by the relevant third-country competent authority, as well as the level and depth of cooperation by the relevant third-country competent authority with ESMA. 6. ESMA shall decide whether to grant comparable compliance for the requirements included in the reasoned request within 90 working days from the receipt of a complete reasoned request submitted in accordance with paragraph 4. 7. ESMA may postpone that decision where the reasoned request or the additional information referred to in paragraph 4 are not submitted in time and the assessment of that request could, as a result, delay ESMA’s decision on the recognition of the third-country CCP or the review of its recognition. 8. A Tier 2 CCP for which ESMA has not granted comparable compliance for one or more requirements may not submit a new reasoned request as referred to in paragraph 1 regarding those requirements, unless there has been a relevant change to the applicable third- country framework or to the way in which that CCP complies with that framework. 9. A Tier 2 CCP that has been granted comparable compliance shall notify ESMA of any change to its applicable third-country framework, to the way in which it complies with the applicable third-country framework and to its internal rules and procedures. ESMA shall inform the Commission of those notifications. 10. Where ESMA has granted comparable compliance to a Tier 2 CCP, ESMA shall review the decision on a regular basis. 11. ESMA shall withdraw comparable compliance from a Tier 2 CCP where ESMA finds that the CCP’s compliance with the applicable thirdcountry framework, following an outcomes-based and risk-based approach, is no longer comparable to the requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V of this Regulation. ESMA shall also take into accordance with Article 82 by 2 January 2021. unt the supervisory outcomes achieved by the relevant third-country competent authority, as well as the level and depth of cooperation by the relevant third-country competent authority with ESMA.’ " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 458 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25f
Article 25f
(21 b) Article 25f is replaced by the following: " Article 25f Request for information 1. ESMA may by simple request or by decision require recognised CCPs and related third parties to whom those CCPs have outsourced operational functions or activities to provide all necessary information to enable ESMA to carry out its duties under this Regulation. 2. WThen sending a simple request for information information referred to in paragraph 1 may be of a periodic or one- off nature. 3. When requiring that information is provided under paragraph 1, ESMA shall indicate all of the following: (a) the reference to this Article as the legal basis of the request; (b) the purpose of the request; (c) the information required; (d) the time limit to provide the information; (e) inform the person from whom the information is requested that there is no obligation to provide the information but that in the case of a voluntary reply to the request the information provided must not be incorrect or misleading; (f) the fine provided for in Article 25j in conjunction with point (a) of Section V of Annex III, where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading. 3. When requiring that information is provided under paragraph 1 by decision, ESMA shall indicate all of the following: (a) the reference to this Article as the legal basis of the request; (b) the purpose of the request; (c) the information required; (d) the time limit to provide the informationwhere the information is of a periodic nature, the periodicity at which the information should be provided; (ef) the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 25k where the production of the required information is incomplete; (f(g) the fine provided for in Article 25j in conjunction with point (a) of Section V of Annex III, for failing to provide the required information or where the answers to questions asked are incorrect or misleading; and (g) the right to appeal the decision before ESMA's Board of Appeal and to have the decision reviewed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘Court of Justice’) in accordance with Articles 60 and 61 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. 4. The persons referred to in paragraph 1 or their representatives and, in the case of legal persons or associations having no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their constitution shall supply the information requested. Lawyers duly authorised to act may supply the information on behalf of their clients. The latter shall remain fully responsible if the information supplied is incomplete, incorrect or misleading. 5. ESMA shall, without delay, send a copy of the simple request or of its decisionrequest to the relevant third-country competent authority where the persons referred to in paragraph 1 concerned by the request for information are domiciled or established. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 459 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25fa (new)
Article 25fa (new)
Amendment 461 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 25
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 26
Article 26
1. A CCP shall have robust governance arrangements, which include a clear organisational structure with well- defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility, effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks to which it is or might be exposed, and adequate internal control mechanisms, including sound administrative and accounting procedures. AWithout prejudice to interoperability arrangements, or other arrangements such as cross- margining and sponsored-memberships or sponsored access, between CCPs, a CCP shall not be or become a clearing member, a client, or establish indirect clearing arrangements with a clearing member with the aim to undertake clearing activities at a CCP.;
Amendment 463 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 29 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 29 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 37
Article 37
1. A CCP shall establish, where relevant per type of product cleared, the categories of admissible clearing members and the admission criteria, upon the advice of the risk committee pursuant to Article 28(3). Such criteria shall be non- discriminatory, transparent and objective so as to ensure fair and open access to the CCP and shall ensure that clearing members have sufficient financial resources and operational capacity to meet the obligations arising from participation in a CCP. Criteria that restrict access shall be permitted only to the extent that their objective is to control the risk for the CCP. TWithout prejudice to interoperability arrangements, or other arrangements such as cross- margining and sponsored- memberships or sponsored access, between CCPs, the criteria shall ensure that CCPs or clearing houses cannot be clearing members, directly or indirectly, of the CCP.;
Amendment 470 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 30 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 30 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 38 – paragraph 7
Article 38 – paragraph 7
(a a) "7. A CCP shall provide its clearing members with information on the initial margin models it uses. That information shall: (a) clearly explain the design of the initial margin models and how ithey operates; (b) clearly describe the key assumptions and limitations of the initial margin model and the circumstances under which those assumptions are no longer valid; (c) be documented. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 482 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 46 – paragraph 1
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. A CCP shall accept highly liquid collateral with minimal credit and market risk to cover its initial and ongoing exposure to its clearing members. A CCP may accept public guarantees or public bank or uncollateralised commercial bank guarantees, provided that they are unconditionally available upon request within the liquidation period referred to in Article 41. Where bank guarantees are provided to a CCP, that CCP shall take them into account when calculating its exposure to the bank that is also a clearing member. The CCP shall apply adequate haircuts to asset values and guarantees to reflect the potential for their value to decline over the interval between their last revaluation and the time by which they can reasonably be assumed to be liquidated. It shall take into account the liquidity risk following the default of a market participant and the concentration risk on certain assets that may result in establishing the acceptable collateral and the relevant haircuts. When revising the level of the haircuts it applies to the assets it accepts as collateral, the CCP shall take into account any potential procyclicality effects of such revisions.;
Amendment 487 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 48 – paragraph 6
Article 48 – paragraph 6
(33 a) Paragraph 6 is amended: "6. Where assets and positions are recorded in the records and accounts of a CCP as being held for the account of a defaulting clearing member’s client in accordance with Article 39(3), the CCP shall, at least, contractually commit itself to trigger the procedures for the transfer of the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client to another clearing member designated by the client, on the client’s request or unless the client objects before the transfer of assets and positions is concluded and without the consent of the defaulting clearing member. That other clearing member shall be obliged to accept these assets and positions only where it has previously entered into a contractual relationship with the client by which it has committed itself to do so. When designating a clearing member, the client shall contractually designate an alternative clearing member to be used in case their positions need to be transferred in the event of default. If the transfer to that other clearing member has not taken place for any reason within a predefined transfer period specified in its operating rules, the CCP may take all steps permitted by its rules to actively manage its risks in relation to those positions, including liquidating the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 488 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 48 – paragraph 6
Article 48 – paragraph 6
(33 b) A subparagraph is added to Article 48(6) "6. Where assets and positions are recorded in the records and accounts of a CCP as being held for the account of a defaulting clearing member’s client in accordance with Article 39(3), the CCP shall, at least, contractually commit itself to trigger the procedures for the transfer of the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client to another clearing member designated by the client, on the client’s request and without the consent of the defaulting clearing member. That other clearing member shall be obliged to accept these assets and positions only where it has previously entered into a contractual relationship with the client by which it has committed itself to do so. If the transfer to that other clearing member has not taken place for any reason within a predefined transfer period specified in its operating rules, the CCP may take all steps permitted by its rules to actively manage its risks in relation to those positions, including liquidating the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of the client. client. a. In the case of default of an existing clearing member and for the purposes of porting clients from the defaulting clearing members towards an alternative clearing member, such alternative clearing member, the client subject to porting and the CCP shall be temporary waived from the requirements of Directive (EU) 2015/849, Directive (EU) 2018/843 and Directive (EU) 2019/1153. The alternative clearing member shall we temporarily waived from the requirements of capital for clearing members towards clients under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 489 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 33 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 47 – paragraph 9 (new)
Article 47 – paragraph 9 (new)
Amendment 490 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 -a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 -a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 48 – paragraph 5
Article 48 – paragraph 5
(34 a) "5. Where assets and positions are recorded in the records and accounts of a CCP as being held for the account of a defaulting clearing member’s clients in accordance with Article 39(2), the CCP shall, at least, contractually commit itself to trigger the procedures for the transfer of the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of its clients to another clearing member designated by all of those clients, on their request or unless all clients object before the transfer of assets and positions is concluded and without the consent of the defaulting clearing member. That other clearing member shall be obliged to accept those assets and positions only where it has previously entered into a contractual relationship with the clients by which it has committed itself to do so. When designating a clearing member, clients shall contractually designate an alternative clearing member to be used in case their positions need to be transferred in the event of default. If the transfer to that other clearing member has not taken place for any reason within a predefined transfer period specified in its operating rules, the CCP may take all steps permitted by its rules to actively manage its risks in relation to those positions, including liquidating the assets and positions held by the defaulting clearing member for the account of its clients. " Or. en (02012R0648-20220812)
Amendment 495 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2
Article 49 – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2
Where a CCP considers that the change to the models referred to in paragraph 1 it intends to adopt is not significant as referred to paragraph 1gin the below list, the CCP shall request that the application be subject to a non-objection procedure under paragraph 1b. In that case, the CCP may start applying such change before the decision of the CCP’s competent authority and ESMA pursuant to paragraph 1b. A change shall be considered as non- significant where one of the following conditions is met: a) the change leads to a decrease or increase of the margin requirements greater than 10% and lower than 20%; b) The CCP intends to offer a new clearing member access model, or to offer clearing services with a non-materially different risk profile and characteristics than the current ones, c) The list of eligible collateral is extended to accept collateral with a materially different risk profile: a. new asset class; b. new category of issuer, such as corporate or sovereign, or level of credit risk.
Amendment 502 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point a
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point a
(a) the change leads to a decrease or increase of the total pre-funded financial resources, including margin requirements, default fund and skin-in-the-game, greater than 1520 %;
Amendment 506 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point b
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point b
Amendment 508 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point c
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point c
Amendment 511 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point d
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point d
(d) the methodology for defining and calibrating stress test scenarios for the purpose of determining default fund exposures, is changed, leading to a decrease or increase greater than 20 % of a default fund, or greater than 50 % of any individual default fund contribution;
Amendment 513 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point e
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point e
(e) the methodology applied to assess liquidity risk and monitor concentration risk, is changed, leading to a decrease or increase of the estimated liquidity needs in any currency greater than 20 % or the total liquidity needs greater than 10 %;
Amendment 515 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point f
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point f
(f) the methodology applied to value collateral, or calibrate collateral haircut or set concentration limits, is changed, such that the total value of non- cash collateral decreases or increases by more than 120 %; provided that the CCP’s proposed change does not fulfil any criteria for the extension of CCP’s authorisation specified in Article 2(1);
Amendment 517 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point g
Article 49 – paragraph 1 g – point g
Amendment 523 #
2022/0403(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point d a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 34 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 49 – paragraph 7 (new)
Article 49 – paragraph 7 (new)
(d a) the following paragraph 7 is added: Where a CCP intends to adopt a change that does not qualify as non-significant pursuant to paragraph 1a of Article 49 and does not qualify significant under paragraph 1g of Article 49, such change shall be directly implemented by the CCP and shall not be subject to the procedures referred to in paragraph 49.
Amendment 91 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Plastic packaging is the most carbon-intensive material and, in terms of fossil fuel use, recycling of plastic waste is approximately five-times better than incineration with energy recovery35. Just as the European Strategy for Plastics36states, CEAP commits to increase uptake of recycled plastics and contribute to the more sustainable use of plastics. The Union budget and the system of own resources contribute to reducing pollution from plastic packaging waste37. As of 1 January 2021, the Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the system of own resources of the European Union introduced a national contribution that is proportional to the quantity of plastic packaging waste that is not recycled in each Member State. This own resource is part of incentives to reduce the consumption of single-use plastics, foster recycling and boost the circular economy. The availability of high quality recycled plastics should be ensured through mechanical and chemical recycling of plastic waste and sustainable renewable biobased plastics. _________________ 35 Amadei A., Ardente F., Garcia-Gutierrez P., Klenert D., Nessi S., Tonini D., Tosches D., Saveyn H.(2022), Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling, Mechanical, physical and chemical recycling technologies, publication pending. 36 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy COM(2018)28 final. 37 Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the system of own resources of the European Union and repealing Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom COM (OJ L 424, 15.12.2020, p. 1).
Amendment 98 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The European Parliament’s Resolution of 10 February 2021 on the New Circular Economy Action Plan39reiterated the objective of making all packaging reusable or recyclable in an economically viable way by 2030 and called on the Commission to present a legislative proposal including waste reduction measures and targets and ambitious essential requirements in the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive to reduce excessive packaging, including in e-commerce, improve recyclability and minimise the complexity of packaging, increase recycled content, phase out hazardous and harmful substances, and promote re-use without compromising food safety or hygiene standards. _________________ 39 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc ument/TA-9-2021-0040_EN.html
Amendment 104 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In line with the waste hierarchy set out in Article 4(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC, and in line with life-cycle thinking to deliver the best overall environmental outcome, the measures provided for under this Regulation aim at reducing the amount of packaging placed on the market in terms of its volume and weight, and preventing the generation of packaging waste, especially through packaging minimisation, avoiding packaging where it is not needed, and increased re-use of packaging. In addition, the measures aim at increasing the use of recycled content in packaging, especially in plastic packaging where the uptake of recycled content is very low, as well as higher recycling rates for all packaging and high quality of the resulting secondary raw materials while reducing other forms of recovery and final disposal. In order to increase the availability and quality of recyclates, the focus should be on the raw materials ability to retain its inherent material properties after recycling, and its ability to replace primary raw materials in future applications.
Amendment 105 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In line with the waste hierarchy set out in Article 4(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC, and in line with life-cycle thinking to deliver the best overall environmental outcome, the measures provided for under this Regulation aim at reducing the amount of packaging placed on the market in terms of its volume and weight, and preventing the generation of packaging waste, especially through packaging minimisation, avoiding packaging where it is not needed, and increased re-use of packagingand recycling of packaging while delivering the best environmental outcome. Goals for reducing the amount of packaging and packaging waste must not cause or increase the risk for food waste and food safety. In addition, the measures aim at increasing the use of recycled content in packaging, especially in plastic packaging where the uptake of recycled content is very low, as well as higher recycling rates for all packaging and high quality of the resulting secondary raw materials while reducing other forms of recovery and final disposal.
Amendment 110 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Packaging should be designed, manufactured and commercialised in such a way as to allow for its re-use or high- quality recycling, and to minimise its impact on the environment during its entire life-cycle and the life cycle of products, for which it was designed. Deviations can be justified by the Waste Hierarchy according to Article 4 paragraph 2 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 117 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Designing packaging with the objective of its recycling, once it becomes packaging waste, is one the most efficient measures to improve the packaging circularity and raise packaging recycling rates and the use of recycled content in packaging while ensuring packaging performs its functions as outlined in Article 3(1). A high standard of quality and the protection of intellectual property, which are important to safeguard the reputation which the Union's products have achieved on the global market and prevent the usurpation, imitation, evocation of geographical indication names and trademarks, must also be taken into account. Packaging design for recycling criteria have been established for a number of packaging formats under voluntary industry schemes or by some Member States for the purpose of the modulation of extended producer responsibility fees. In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and provide industry with a level playing field, and with the objective to promote the sustainability of packaging, it is important to set mandatory requirements regarding the recyclability of packaging, by harmonising the criteria and the methodology for assessing packaging recyclability based on a design for recycling methodology at the Union level. In order to meet the objective set out in the CEAP that, by 2030, all packaging should be recyclable or reusable, in an economically viable manner, packaging recyclability performance grades should be established based on design for recycling criteria for packaging categories as listed in Annex II. However, packaging should comply with them only as of 1 January 2030 in order to give sufficient time to the economic operators to adapt.
Amendment 118 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Designing packaging with the objective of its recycling, once it becomes packaging waste, is one the most efficient measures to improve the packaging circularity and raise packaging recycling rates and the use of recycled content in packaging. Packaging design for recycling criteria have been established for a number of packaging formats under voluntary industry schemes or by some Member States for the purpose of the modulation of extended producer responsibility fees. In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and provide industry with a level playing field, and with the objective to promote the sustainability of packaging, it is important to set mandatory requirements regarding the recyclability of packaging, by harmonising the criteria and the methodology for assessing packaging recyclability based on a design for recycling methodology at the Union level. In order to meet the objective set out in the CEAP that, by 2030, all packaging should be recyclable or reusable, in an economically viable manner, packaging recyclability performance grades should be established based on design for recycling criteria for packaging categories as listed in Annex II and assessment of material output from recycling technology to the input of waste from packaging type ratio by weight. To assess this the best available and commercially operated recycling technology should be considered and mass balance may be used where packaging is a part of wider waste stream. However, packaging should comply with them only as of 1 January 2030 in order to give sufficient time to the economic operators to adapt.
Amendment 130 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) In order to prevent barriers to the internal market and ensure the efficient implementation of the obligations, economic operators should ensure that the plastic part of each unit of packagingpackaging where plastics is the predominant material contains a certain minimum percentage of sustainable renewable content or recycled content recovered from post- consumer plastic waste calculated as an average of the plastic packaging placed on the territory of a Member State. This shall not apply to plastic packaging in contact with food if the recycled content poses a risk to food, human or animal safety.
Amendment 137 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the rules on calculating and verifying, per unit of post-consumer plastic waste in packaging, the share of recycled content recovered from post- consumer plastic waste present and establishing the format for technical documentation, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing provisions, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council55. _________________ 55 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
Amendment 143 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) For limited packaging applications made of biodegradable plastic polymers, there is a demonstrable environmental benefit of using compostable packaging, which enters composting plants, including anaerobic digestion facilities under controlled conditions. Furthermore, where appropriate waste collection schemes and waste treatment infrastructures are available in a Member State, there should be a limited flexibility in deciding whether to mandate the use of compostable plastics for lightweight plastic carrier bags on its territory. In order to avoid consumer confusion about the correct disposal and considering the environmental benefit of circularity of the carbon, all other plastic packaging should go into material recycling and the design of such packaging should ensure that it does not affect the recyclability of other waste streams or endanger the quality or usability of compost in line with the requirements of the EN 13432.
Amendment 146 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) Packaging should be designed so as to minimise its volume and weight while maintaining its ability to perform the packaging functions, including those referred to in Article 3(1), and without compromising the need for a high standard of quality and the recognition and respect of intellectual property rights. The manufacturer of packaging should assess the packaging against the performance criteria, as listed in Annex IV of this Regulation. In view of the objective of this Regulation to reduce packaging and packaging waste generation and to improve circularity of packaging across the internal market, it is appropriate to further specify the existing criteria and to make them more stringent. The list of the packaging performance criteria, as listed in the existing harmonised standard EN 13428:200057, should therefore be modified. While marketing and consumer acceptance remain relevant for packaging design, they should not be part of performance criteria justifying on their own additional packaging weight and volume. However, as set out in Article 9,this should not compromise product or packaging specifications for craft and industrial products and food, wine, spirit drinks, other alcoholic beverages and agricultural products that are registered andor protected under the EU geographical indication protection scheme, products of a distinctive origin as part of the Union’s objective to protect intellectual property cultural heritage and traditional know-how. On the other hand, recyclability, the use of recycled content, and re-use may justify additional packaging weight or volume, and should be added to the performance criteria. Packaging with double walls, false bottoms and other characteristics only aimed to increase the perceived product volume should not be placed on the market, as it does not meet the requirement for packaging minimisation. The same rule should apply to superfluous packaging not necessary for ensuring packaging functionality. The minimisation of packaging should not limit the format of packaging of foodstuffs, which are necessary to protect them from physical shocks contamination and microbes. _________________ 57 Packaging – Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition – Prevention by source reduction.
Amendment 150 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
Recital 42
(42) In order to facilitate conformity assessment with requirements on packaging minimisation, it is necessary to provide presumption of conformity for packaging which is in conformity with harmonised standards adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 for the purpose of expressing detailed technical specifications of those requirements and specify measurable design criteria, including where appropriate, maximum weight or empty space limits for specific packaging formats as well as by-default, standardised packaging designs that comply with the packaging minimisation requirement. without compromising the requirements or safety needed for packaging materials in contact with food.
Amendment 152 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) To promote the circularity and sustainable use of packaging, reusable packaging and systems for re-use should be incentivised without posing a risk for food safety or food quality. For that purpose, it is necessary to clarify the notion of reusable packaging and to ensure that it is linked not only to the packaging design, which should enable a maximum number of trips or rotations and maintaining the safety, quality and hygiene requirements when being emptied, unloaded, refilled or reloaded, but also to the setting up of systems for re-use respecting minimum requirements as set out in this Regulation. Energy logistics and increased amount of water used should be taken into account and evaluated if the re-use system is economically feasible. Member states should be allowed to deviate from these provisions if justified from the environmental perspective or wide scale recycling systems are applied in the Member state. In order to facilitate conformity assessment with requirements on reusable packaging, it is necessary to provide for presumption of conformity for packaging which is in conformity with harmonised standards adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 for the purpose of expressing detailed technical specifications of those requirements and define reusable packaging criteria and formats, including minimum number of trips or rotations, standardised designs, as well as requirements for systems for re-use, including hygiene requirements.
Amendment 157 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
(60) The problem of excessive packaging waste generation cannot be fully addressed by setting obligations on packaging design. For certain packaging types, obligations to reduce the empty space should be set on economic operators in terms of reducing the empty space when using such packaging. In case of grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging used for supply of products to final distributors or end user, the empty space ration should not exceed 40 %. Air between or within particles of packed foodstuff or protective gases are not considered an empty space. In line with the waste hierarchy, it should be possible for economic operators using sales packaging as e-commerce packaging to be exempted from this obligation.
Amendment 162 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
Recital 61
(61) In order to ensure a high level of environmental protection in the internal market as well as a high level of food safety and hygiene, and facilitate the achievement of the packaging waste prevention targets, unnecessary or avoidable packaging should not be allowed to be placed on the market unless such packaging is necessary to protect the quality, hygiene and food safety of the product and to avoid food waste and contamination risks. The list of such packaging formats is provided in Annex V of this Regulation. In order to adapt the list to the technical and scientific progress the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to amend the list.
Amendment 168 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 63
Recital 63
(63) Reusable packaging has to be safe for its users and guarantee that food safety and hygiene requirements are not compromised as packaging plays an important role in the preservation and protection of food and product. Therefore, economic operators offering their products in reusable packaging have to ensure that, before a reusable packaging is used again, it is subject to a reconditioning process, for which requirements should be laid down.
Amendment 171 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67
Recital 67
(67) In order to reduce the increasing proportion of packaging that is single use and the growing amounts of packaging waste generated, it is necessary to establish quantitative re-use and refill targets on packaging in sectors, which have been assessed as having the greatest potential for packaging waste reduction, namely food and beverages for take-away, large-white goods and transport packaging. This was appraised based on factors such as existing systems for re-use, necessity of using packaging and the possibility of fulfilling the functional requirements in terms of containment, tidiness, health, hygiene and safety. Differences of the products and their production and distribution systems, were also taken into account. The setting of the targets is expected to support the innovation and increase the proportion of re-use and refill solutions. The use of single use packaging for food and beverages filled and consumed within the premises in the HORECA sector should not be allowed, unless the recyclable single use packaging delivers a better overall environmental outcome which is justified by life-cycle thinking and impacts for health and safety is not compromised, in line with Article 4 paragraph 2 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 174 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 68
Recital 68
(68) To increase their effectiveness and ensure the equal treatment of economic operators, the re-use and refill targets should be placed on the economic operators. In cases of targets for beverages, they should be additionally placed also on the manufacturers, as these actors are able to control the packaging formats used for the products they offer and decide based on thorough consideration of logistics, environmental, technical, industrial and consumer criteria. The targets should be calculated as a percentage of sales in reusable packaging within a system for re- use or through refill or, in case of transport packaging, as a percentage of uses. The targets should be material neutral. A detailed assessment should be carried out to ensure that reuse targets can be implemented in a safe, economically viable and environmentally sustainable way that would bring tangible benefits compared to recyclable alternatives. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of targets for re-use and refill, the power to adopt an implementing act in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty on the methodology for their calculation, should be delegated to the Commission.
Amendment 175 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 69
Recital 69
(69) Certain uses of single use transport packaging formats are not necessary, as there is a wide range of well-functioning reusable alternatives. In order to ensure that such alternatives are effectively used, it is appropriate to require economic operators, when transporting products between different sites of the same economic operator or between the economic operator and the linked or partner enterprises, to use only reusable transport packaging with respect to packaging formats such as pallets, foldable plastic boxes, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, both rigid and flexible, or drums. The same obligation should, for the same reasons, apply to economic operators transporting products within one Member State. In line with the Article 4 paragraph 2 of Directive 2008/98/EC, deviations must be possible for recyclable single use \000000EN.doc 33/80 EN packaging, if it provides a better overall environmental outcome justified by the life-cycle thinking. Member states may have regulate typical appropriate deviations reflecting local conditions.
Amendment 179 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70
Recital 70
(70) Achieving re-use and refill targets can be challenging for smaller economic operators. Therefore, certain economic operators should be exempted from the obligation to meet the packaging re-use targets if they place less than a certain volume of packaging on the market, or fulfil the definition of micro-company under Commission Recommendation 2003/36160, or have the sales area, including all storage and dispatch areas, under a certain surface limit. The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission to establish re-use and refill targets for other products, to lay down further exemptions for other economic operators or to exempt specific packaging formats covered by the reuse or refill targets in case of severe hygiene, food safety or environmental issues preventing the achievement of these targets. Delegated acts should be in line with Article 4 paragraph 2 of Directive 2008/98/EC by enabling deviations justified by the best environmental outcome and life cycle thinking. _________________ 60 Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (notified under document number C(2003) 1422) (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
Amendment 183 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 90
Recital 90
(90) Waste prevention is the most efficient way to improve resource efficiency and to reduce the environmental impact of waste. It is important therefore that economic operators take appropriate measures to reduce the waste generation by eliminating excessive packaging and restrict the uses of certain packaging formats, unless the packaging is essential in preventing food waste or ensuring consumer safety, extending the life span of packaging, re-designing products so that no packaging or less packaging can be used, including bulk sales, and by shifting where beneficial to the environment and where this does not call into question the benefits on the prevention of food waste or ensuring consumer safety, from single use packaging to reusable packaging.
Amendment 194 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 108
Recital 108
(108) As a specific packaging waste generation prevention measure, Member States should actively encourage the re-use and refill solutions, unless the use of easily and highly recyclable single-use packaging is shown to be better option according to a life cycle assessment. They should support the establishment of systems for re-use and refill and monitor their functioning and compliance with the hygiene standards. Member States are encouraged to take also other measures, such as setting up deposit and return systems covering reusable packaging formats, using economic incentives or establishing requirements for final distributors to make available a certain percentage of other products than those covered by re-use and refill targets in reusable packaging or through refill provided that such requirements will not result in fragmentation of single market and creation of trade barriers.
Amendment 198 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. This Regulation contributes to the transition to a circular economy and achieving climate neutrality by 2050, by laying down measures in line with the hierarchy of waste in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC and by taking into account the possibilities of a biobased economy in accordance with Bioeconomy Action Plan.
Amendment 200 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
(f) tea orcompostable coffee bags and system single-serve units or tea bags necessary to contain a tea or coffeecoffee or tea product and intended to be used and disposed of together with the product;
Amendment 201 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point f
(f) tea or coffeecompostable coffee and tea bags necessary to contain a tea or coffee product and intended to be used and disposed of together with the product;
Amendment 206 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22
(22) ‘re-use’ means any operation by which reusable packaging is used again for the same purpose for which it was conceived as part of a broader reuse system, with or without the support of auxiliary products, including refill- and dilute-at-home solutions;
Amendment 210 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 28
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 28
(28) ‘refill’ means an operation entailing a system for refill by which an end user fills its own a container, which fulfils the packaging function, with a product or several products offered by the final distributor in the context of a commercial transactionpurchased through a final distributor;
Amendment 225 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 41
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 41
(41) ‘compostable packaging’ means packaging capable of undergoing physical, chemical, thermal or biological decomposition such that most of the finished compost ultimately decomposes into carbon dioxide, mineral salts, biomass and water, according to Article 47(4), and does not hinder the separate collection and the composting process or activity into which it is introduced in industrially controlled conditions and has to fulfil the requirements laid down in the standards of EN 13432;
Amendment 227 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 43 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 43 a (new)
(43a) ‘plastic packaging’ means a packaging that is wholly or predominantly made of plastic;
Amendment 254 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to supplement this Regulation in order to establish design for recycling criteria and recycling performance grades based on the criteria and parameters listed in Table 2 of Annex II for packaging categories listed in Table 1 of that Annex, as well as rules concerning the modulation of financial contributions to be paid by producers to comply with their extended producer responsibility obligations set out in Article 40(1), based on the packaging recycling performance grade, and for plastic packaging, the percentage of recycled content. Design-for-recycling criteria shall consider state of the art collection, sorting and recycling processes and shallensuring that packaging is able to perform its functions as outlined in Article 3(1) and covers all packaging components.
Amendment 261 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 7 – point a
(a) the manner in which to express the result of the recyclability assessment, evaluated directly or through mass balance as material yield from waste input achieved in commercially operated and available recycling technology, in recyclability performance grades from A to E, as described in Table 3 of Annex II, based on the percentage of the packaging unit, in weight, which is recyclable according to paragraph 1;
Amendment 272 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. From 1 January 2030, the plastic part in packagingpackaging where plastics is the predominant material shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of packagingor sustainable renewable content, either mechanically or chemically recovered from post-consumer plastic waste calculated as an average of the plastic packaging placed to the market on the territory of a Member State:
Amendment 281 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 310 % for contact sensitive plastic packaging made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as the major component;
Amendment 283 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 285 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 10 % for contact sensitive plastic packaging made from plastic materials other than PET, except single use plastic beverage bottles;
Amendment 286 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) 35 % for plastic packaging other than those referred to in points (a), (b) and (c), except for contact sensitive plastic packaging made from plastic materials other than PET.
Amendment 292 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. From 1 January 2040, the plastic part in packagingpackaging where plastics is the predominant material shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of packagingor sustainable renewable content, either mechanically or chemically recovered from post-consumer plastic waste calculated as an average of the plastic packaging placed by a producer on the territory of a Member State:
Amendment 294 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. From 1 January 2040, the plastic part in packaging placed on the market, shall contain the following minimum percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of packaging:
Amendment 300 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 308 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. (da) packaging for infants, baby food, food for special medical purposes or packaging for drinks or foods typically used for young children as defined in Article 1 point (a), (b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 609/2013.
Amendment 311 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to compostable plasticor bio-based plastic packaging, as well as inks, adhesives, varnishes and coatings used on packaging.
Amendment 318 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. By 31 December 2026, the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts establishing the methodology for the calculation and verification of the percentage of recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, per unit of plastic packaging, and the format for the technical documentation referred to in Annex VII. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3).
Amendment 330 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. By [OP: please insert the date = 24 months from the entry into force of this Regulation], packaging referred to in Article 3(1), points (f) and (g), sticky labels attached to fruit and vegetables and very lightweight plastic carrier bags shall be compostable in industrially controlled conditions in bio- waste treatment facilities. in line with the standard EN 13432:2000 to not to affect the quality of compost or pose contamination risks.
Amendment 343 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Packaging shall be designed so that its weight and volume is reduced to the minimum necessary for ensuring its functionality taking account of the material that the packaging is made ofas listed in the definition of packaging set out in Article 3(1) taking account of the material that the packaging is made of, a specific shape or design protected by intellectual property rights, to help distinguish and protect a product to ensure the safety of the consumer and to protect the GIs and other products of distinctive origin protected under Union law.
Amendment 355 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of assessing the compliance with this paragraph, space filled by paper cuttings, air cushions, bubble wraps, sponge fillers, foam fillers, wood wool, polystyrene, styrofoam chips or other filling materials shall be considered as empty space. Air between or within particles of packed foodstuff or protective gases are not considered an empty space.
Amendment 377 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
For the purpose of this calculation, ’empty space’ means:
Amendment 378 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) empty spacewith respect to shall meanes packaging: the difference between the total volume of grouped packaging, transport packaging or e-commercesales packaging and the total volume of sales packaging contained thereingoods in this packaging;
Amendment 379 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) empty space ratio shall mean the ratio of the empty space as defined in point (a) of this paragraph andwith respect to grouped packaging, transport packaging and e-commerce packaging: the difference between the total volume of the grouped packaging, transport packaging or e-commerce packaging. and the volume of sales packaging contained therein;
Amendment 380 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Space filled by filling materials such as paper cuttings, air cushions, bubble wraps, sponge fillers, foam fillers, wood wool, polystyrene or Styrofoam chips, shall be considered as empty space. In addition, if the shape of the product causes a situation where minimizing the empty space would lead to an increase of the amount of packaging material, it is possible to deviate from the principle of an empty space by minimizing the amount of packaging material.
Amendment 386 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Economic operators shall not place on the market packaging in the formats and for the purposes listed in Annex V, unless such placing on the market is in line with paragraph 2 of Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 402 #
2022/0396(COD)
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 58 to amend Annex V in order to adapt it to technical and scientific progress with the objective to reducing packaging waste and improving the overall environmental outcome in line with paragraph 2 of Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC. When adopting those delegated acts, the Commission shall consider the potential of the restrictions on the use of specific packaging formats to reduce the packaging waste generated while ensuring an overall positive environmental impact, and shall take into account the availability of alternative packaging solutions that meet requirements set out in legislation applicable to contact sensitive packaging, as well as their capability to prevent microbiological contamination of the packaged product.
Amendment 411 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. From 1 January 2030, economic operators making large household appliances listed in point 21 of Annex II to Directive 2012/19/EU available on the market for the first time within the territory of a Member State shall ensure that 90 % of those products are made available in reusable transport packaging, excluding cardboard, within a system for re-use.
Amendment 412 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. From 1 January 2030, economic operators making large household appliances listed in point 21 of Annex II to Directive 2012/19/EU available on the market for the first time within the territory of a Member State shall ensure that 90 % of those products are made available in reusable transport packaging within a system for re-use.
Amendment 414 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This provision shall not apply to highly recyclable packaging collected and recycled or to well-functioning national deposit and return system defined in the Article 3(51).
Amendment 417 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Amendment 418 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Amendment 421 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 424 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 427 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Amendment 428 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. A final distributor that is conducting its business activity in the HORECA sector and that is making available on the market within the territory of a Member State in sales packaging take-away ready-prepared food, intended for immediate consumption without the need of any further preparation, and typically consumed from the receptacle, shall ensure that:deleted
Amendment 431 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 433 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 439 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Amendment 444 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point a
Amendment 446 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – point b
Amendment 447 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
This provision shall not apply to highly recyclable packaging collected and recycled in close loop or to well- functioning national deposit and return system defined in the Article 3(51).
Amendment 456 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 5
Article 26 – paragraph 5
Amendment 465 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Amendment 467 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. The manufacturer and the final distributor making available on the market within the territory of a Member State in sales packaging non-alcoholic beverages in the form of water, water with added sugar, water with other sweetening matter, flavoured water, soft drinks, soda lemonade, iced tea and similar beverages which are immediately ready to drink, pure juice, juice or must of fruits or vegetables and smoothies without milk and non- alcoholic beverages containing milk fat, shall ensure that:
Amendment 468 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. The manufacturer and the final distributor making available on the market within the territory of a Member State in sales packaging non-alcoholic beverages in the form of water, water with added sugar, water with other sweetening matter, flavoured water, soft drinks, soda lemonade, iced tea and similar beverages which are immediately ready to drink, pure juice, juice or must of fruits or vegetables and smoothies without milk and non- alcoholic beverages containing milk fatwith the exception of drinks and beverages that are highly perishable in line with Regulation (EU) 1169/2011 such as fruit juices, smoothies, milk and plant-based drinks, shall ensure that:
Amendment 471 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – point a
Amendment 473 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 6 – point b
Amendment 479 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. Economic operators using transport packaging in the form of pallets, plastic crates, foldable plastic boxes, pails and drums for the conveyance or packaging of products in conditions other than provided for under paragraphs 12 and 13, and which are not in direct contact with food shall ensure that:
Amendment 483 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 8 – point a
Article 26 – paragraph 8 – point a
(a) from 1 January 2030, 10 % of such packaging used is reusable packaging within a system for re-use or contains a minimum of 90% recycled content;
Amendment 488 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 8 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 50 % of such packaging used is reusable packaging within a system for re-use or contains a minimum of 90% recycled content;
Amendment 491 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 8 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) from 1 January 2040, 530 % of such packaging used is reusable packaging within a system for re-use;
Amendment 499 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 10 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 10 – introductory part
10. Economic operators using grouped packaging in the form of boxes, excluding cardboard, used outside of sales packaging to group a certain number of products to create a stock-keeping or distribution unit shall ensure that:
Amendment 508 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboard, trays, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, drums and canisters, of all sizes and materials, including flexible formats not in direct contact with food, including flexible formats. In addition, with accordance with Article 4 paragraph 2 of Directive 2008/98/EC, this obligation shall not apply to economic operators using fully recyclable or recycled transport packaging for which recycling is organized by the economic operator and for which reusable solutions are not economically or technically feasible and whose recycling can be demonstrated that recycling works in practice.
Amendment 513 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboard, trays, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, drums and canisters, of all sizes and materials, excluding cardboard and including flexible formats.
Amendment 516 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboard, plastic crates intermediate bulk containers, and drums, of all sizes and materials, including flexible formats. not in direct contact with food, including flexible formats. In addition, with accordance with Article 4 paragraph 2 of Directive 2008/98/EC, this obligation shall not apply to economic operators using fully recyclable or recycled transport packaging for which recycling is organized by the economic operator and for which reusable solutions are not economically or technically feasible and whose recycling can be demonstrated that recycling works in practice.
Amendment 520 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 13 – subparagraph 2
This obligation applies to pallets, boxes, excluding cardboard, plastic crates intermediate bulk containers, and drums, of all sizes and materials, excluding cardboard and including flexible formats.
Amendment 525 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 15
Article 26 – paragraph 15
15. Economic operators shall be exempted from the obligation to meet the targets in paragraphs 2 to 6 if,: (a) during a calendar year, they have a sales area of not more than 100 m2, including also all storage and dispatch areas; (b) reuse is not the option that delivers the best overall environmental outcome justified by life-cycle thinking provided for in paragraph 2 of Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 527 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 15
Article 26 – paragraph 15
15. Economic operators shall be exempted from the obligation to meet the targets in paragraphs 2 to 6 if, during a calendar year, they have a sales area of not more than 100 m2, including also all storage and dispatch areas. or if it is not technically feasible to use reusable packaging or to obtain access to the infrastructure necessary for the functioning of a reuse system.
Amendment 544 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 17 a (new)
Article 26 – paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. The targets laid down in this Article shall be met by economic operators without prejudice to requirements on health, safety and hygiene, including product safety and provided that this delivers a better overall environmental outcome and is justified by life-cycle thinking, in line with the hierarchy of waste as defined in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Amendment 551 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
By 31 December 20286, the Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing detailed calculation rules and methodology regarding the targets set out in Article 26.
Amendment 563 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 43 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. By 1 January 2029, the final distributor making available on the market food and beverages filled and consumed within the premises in the HORECA sector shall ensure that separate collection systems are set up for the different fractions of packaging waste materials, to help the consumer sort packaging waste.
Amendment 564 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 43 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. By 1 January 2029, Member states shall ensure that, in public spaces, separate collection systems are set up for the different fractions of packaging waste materials used in sales packaging in the market of food and beverages filled and consumed for take-away, to help the consumer sort packaging waste.
Amendment 576 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 44 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the rate of separate collection as required under Article 43(3) and (4) of the respective packaging format as reported to the Commission under Article 50(1) point (c) is above 90 % by weight of such packaging placed on the market on the territory of that Member State in the calendar years 2026 and 20279. Where such reporting has not yet been submitted to the Commission, the Member State shall provide a reasoned justification, based on validated national data, and description of the implemented measures, that the conditions for the exemption set out in this paragraph are fulfilled;
Amendment 579 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 5
Article 44 – paragraph 5
5. If the separate collection rate of the packaging referred to in paragraph 1 in a Member State concerned decreases and remains below 90 % by weight of a given packaging format placed on the market for three consecutive calendar years, the Commission shall notify the Member State concerned that the exemption no longer applies. The deposit and return system shall be established by 1 January in the seconthird calendar year following the year in which the Commission notified the Member State concerned that the exemption no longer applies.
Amendment 637 #
2022/0396(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – table 1 – row 2
Annex V – table 1 – row 2
Amendment 61 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The aim of this Regulation is to develop a voluntary Union certification framework for carbon removals and carbon farming, with the view to incentivise the uptake of high- quality carbon removals and, in the case of carbon farming, biogenic emissions reduction, in full respect of the biodiversity and the zero-pollution objectives. It is a tool to support the achievement of the Union objectives under the Paris Agreement, notably the goal of collective climate neutrality by 2050 laid down in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council24 . The Union also committed to generate negative emissions after 2050. An important instrument to enhance carbon removals in terrestrial ecosystems is Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council25 , which is currently under review. The objective of the review is to set out a Union net removals target of 310 Mt CO2 eq by 2030, and to allocate respective targets to each Member State. In this regard, the planned revision of the Regulation should also look how to incorporate the carbon removals achieved through carbon farming in the EU and national targets. Furthermore, in the case of biogenic emissions reduction, the Commission should consider how to include those in the ETS trading system. __________________ 24 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1). 25 Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU (OJ L 156, 19.6.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 72 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Union certification framework will support the development of carbon removal activities in the Union that result in an unambiguous net carbon removal benefit, while avoiding greenwashing. In the case of carbon farming, such certification framework should also encourage the uptake of carbon removal activities that generate co-benefits for biodiversity, therefore achievachieving biogenic emissions reduction together with carbon removals, as these two are intrinsically linked ing their nature restoration targets set out in Union law on nature restorational cycles. Biogenic emissions reduction will require their own methodology for accounting and certification, alongside carbon removals. The Union certification framework will be instrumental in meeting the Union climate change mitigation objectives set in international agreements and in the Union legislation.
Amendment 78 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) The Union voluntary certification framework builds on and contributes to the ongoing public and private work regarding the certification of carbon removals.
Amendment 80 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to support operators willing to make additional efforts to increase carbon removals in a sustainable way, the Union certification framework should take into account the different types of carbon removal and carbon farming activities, their specificities and related environmental impacts. Therefore, this Regulation should provide clear definitions of carbon removal, carbon removal activities, and other elements of the Union certification frameworkfarming, carbon farming storage, biogenic emissions reductions, carbon removal and carbon farming activities, and other elements of the Union certification framework and specify broad range of financing possibilities, either private or public.
Amendment 89 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) This Regulation should set out the requirements under which carbon removals and biogenic emission reduction should be eligible for certification under the Union certification framework. To this end, carbon removals should be quantified in an accurate and robust way; and they should be generated only by carbon removal activities that generate a net carbon removal benefit, are additional, aim to ensure long-term storage of carbon, and have a neutral impact or co-benefit on sustainability objectives. For the carbon removals and biogenic emissions reductions achieved through carbon farming, these should also be quantified in an accurate and robust way, with information provided through the LPIS database; they should also be additional and create co-benefits. Furthermore, carbon removals should be subject to independent third-party auditing in order to ensure the credibility and reliability of the certification process. Mandatory Union carbon pricing rules established through Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council26 are in place which regulate the treatment of emissions from activities covered by that Directive. This Regulation should be without prejudice to Directive 2003/87/EC, except in relation to the certification of removals of emissions from sustainable biomass which are zero-rated in accordance with Annex IV thereto. __________________ 26 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
Amendment 102 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) A carbon removal and carbon farming activity should result in a net carbon removal benefit showing that it delivers a positive climate impact. The net carbon removal benefit should be computed following two steps. First, operators should quantify the amount of additional carbon removals that a carbon removal activity has generated in comparison to a baseline. In the case of carbon farming, furthermore, operators should also quantify the biogenic emissions reductions set against the baseline. A standardised baseline reflecting the standard performance of comparable activities in similar social, economic, environmental and technological circumstances and geographical locations should be preferred because it ensures objectivity, minimises compliance and other administrative costs, and positively recognises the action of first movers who have already engaged in carbon removal activities. In the context of carbon farming, the use of available digital technologies, including electronic databases and geographic information systems, remote sensing, artificial intelligence and machine learning, and of electronic maps should be promoted to decrease the costs of establishing baselines and of monitoring carbon removal activities. However, where it is not possible to set such a standardised baseline, a project-specific baseline based on the operator’s individual performance may be used. In order to reflect the social, economic, environmental and technological developments and to encourage ambition over time in line with the Paris Agreement, baselines should be periodically updated.
Amendment 109 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The second step for quantifying the net carbon removal benefit should consist of subtracting any increase in greenhouse gas emissions related to the implementation of the carbon removal activity. Relevant greenhouse gas emissions that should be taken into consideration include direct emissions, such as those resulting from the use of more fertilisers, fuel or energy, or indirect emissions, such as those resulting from land use change, with consequent risks for food security due to displacement of agricultural production. A reduction in greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the implementation of the carbon removal activity should not be taken into account to quantify the net carbon removal benefit, but should be considered as a co-benefit towards the sustainability objective of climate change mitigation; by being reported on the certificates, decreases in greenhouse gas emissions (like the other sustainability co-benefits) can increase the value of the certified carbon removals. However, for carbon farming activities, the reduction of biogenic emissions shall be counted towards the net benefit of the activity, especially due to the interconnected nature of carbon and nitrogen cycles.
Amendment 111 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) A carbon removal activity delivers a net carbon removal benefit when the carbon removals above the baseline outweigh any increase in greenhouse gas emissions due to the implementation of the carbon removal activity. For instance, in the case of activities that deliver permanent carbon storage by injecting carbon underground, the amount of permanently stored carbon should outweigh the energy- related greenhouse gas emissions from the industrial process. In the case of carbon farming, the carbon captured by an afforestation activity or the carbon kept in the ground by a peatland re-wetting activity should outweigh the emissions from the machinery used to carry out the carbon removal activity or the indirect land use change emissions that can be caused by carbon leakage. Farmers, forest owners and managers should strive to achieve biogenic emission reductions rather, which shall be quantified and accounted for as part of the net removal benefit.
Amendment 118 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Carbon removals should be quantified in a relevant, accurate, complete, consistent and comparable manner. Uncertainties in the quantification should be duly reported and accounted in order to limit the risk of overestimating the quantity of carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere. Carbon removals and biogenic emissions reductions generated by carbon farming should be quantified with a high level of accuracy to assure the highest quality and minimise uncertainties. Moreover, in order to incentivise synergies between Union climate and biodiversity objectives, enhanced monitoring of land needs to be required, thereby helping to protect and enhance the resilience of nature-based carbon removals throughout the Union. The satellite and on-site monitoring and reporting of emissions and removals need to closely reflect those approaches, and make the best use of advanced technologies available under Union programmes, such as Copernicus, making full use of already existing tools, and ensure consistency with the national greenhouse gas inventories.
Amendment 121 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In order to ensure that the Union certification framework channels incentives toward carbon removals and biogenic emissions reductions that go beyond the standard practice, carbon removal and carbon farming activities should be additional. Therefore, these activities should go beyond statutory requirements, that is, operators should carry out activities that are not already imposed upon them by the applicable law. Moreover, carbon removal and carbon farming activities should take place due to the incentive effect provided by the certification. Such effect is present when the incentive created by the potential revenues, resulting from the certification, changes the behaviour of operators in such a way that they engage in the additional carbon removal activity to achieve additional carbon removals.
Amendment 125 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) A standardised baseline should reflect the statutory and market conditions in which the carbon removal or carbon farming activity takes place. If a carbon removal activity is imposed upon operators by the applicable law, or it does not need any incentives to take place, its performance will be reflected in the baseline. For this reason, a carbon removal activity that generates carbon removals in excess of such a baseline should be presumed to be additional. Hence, the use of a standardised baseline should simplify the demonstration of additionality for operators. Therefore, it should reduce the administrative burden of the certification process, which is particularly important in the case of small- scale land managers.
Amendment 126 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Atmospheric and biogenic carbon that is captured and stored through a carbon removal activity risks being released back into the atmosphere (e.g. reversal) due to natural or anthropogenic causes. Therefore, operators should take all relevant preventive measures to mitigate those risks and duly monitor that carbon continues to be stored over the monitoring period laid down for the relevant carbon removal activity. The validity of the certified carbon removals should depend on the expected duration of the storage and the different risks of reversal associated with the given carbon removal activity. Among other possibilities, activities that store carbon in geological formations provide enough certainties on the very long-term duration of several centuries for the stored carbon and can be considered as providing permanent storage of carbon. Carbon farming or carbon storage in products are more exposed to the risk of voluntary or involuntary release of carbon into the atmosphere. To account for this risk, the validity of the certified carbon removals generated by carbon farming and carbon storage in products should not be subject to an expiry date matching with the end of the relevant monitoring period. Thereafter, thebut should be further defined per carbon farming activity in the certification methodology. The risk of reversibility of carbon storage should be assumed to be released into the atmosphere, unless the economic operator proves the maintenance of the carbon stoccounted for in the discount rate set for the carbon farming activity. Moreover, in order not to discourage sequestration actions, which in the short term can account for significant amounts of carbon, short- term storage should be encouraged to stimulate farmers' transition and investments in sequestration practices. Various mechanisms exist to integragte through uninterrupted monitoring activitieshort-term storage into the carbon market and the associated risk which should be deployed such as reserve funds, insurance, rebate systems.
Amendment 140 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Carbon removal activities have a strong potential to deliver win-win solutions for sustainability, even if trade- offs cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is appropriate to establish minimum sustainability requirements to ensure that carbon removal activities have a neutral impact or generate co-benefits for the sustainability objectives of climate change mitigation and adaptation, the protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems, the sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, the transition to a circular economy, and pollution prevention and control. Those sustainability requirements should, as appropriate, and taking into consideration local conditions, build on the technical screening criteria for Do Not Significant Harm concerning forestry activities and underground permanent geological storage of CO2, laid down in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/213928 , and on the sustainability criteria for forest and agriculture biomass raw material laid down in Article 29 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 . Practices, such as forest monocultures, that produce harmful effects for. Carbon farming activities should contribute to at least one additional practice set out, such as prevention and improvement of water quality, protection of biodiversity shouland not be eligible for certificationhers. __________________ 28 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives (OJ L 442, 9.12.2021, p. 1). 29 Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82).
Amendment 154 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Farming practices that remove CO2 from the atmosphere contribute to the climate neutrality objective and should be rewarded, either via the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) or other public or private initiatives. Specifically, this Regulation should take into account farming practices as referenced in the Communication on Sustainable Carbon Cycles30 . __________________ 30 Communication from the Commission, Sustainable Carbon Cycles, COM (20221) 800.
Amendment 162 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Operators or groups of operators may report co-benefits that contribute to the sustainability objectives beyond the minimum sustainability requirements. To this end, their reporting should comply with the certification methodologies tailored to the different carbon removal activities, developed by the Commission. Certification methodologies should, as much as possible, incentivise the generation of co-benefits for biodiversity going beyond the minimum sustainability requirements. These additional co-benefits will give more economic value to the certified carbon removals and will result in higher revenues for the operators. In the light of these considerations, it is appropriate for the Commission to prioritise the development of tailored certification methodologies on carbon farming activities that provide significant co-benefits for biodiversity.
Amendment 168 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) It is appropriate to develop detailed certification methodologies for the different carbon removal and carbon farming activities in order to apply, in a standardised, verifiable and comparable way, the quality criteria laid down in this Regulation. Those methodologies should ensure the robust and transparent certification of the net carbon removal benefit generated by the carbon removal activity, while avoiding disproportionate administrative burden for operators or group of operators, in particular for small farmers and forest holders. To this end, the Commission should be empowered to supplement this Regulation by adopting delegated acts establishing detailed certification methodologies for the different carbon removal activities. Those methodologies should be developed in close consultation with the Expert Group on Carbon Removals and all other interested actors. They need to be based on the best available scientific evidence, build upon existing public and private schemes and methodologies for carbon removal certification, and take into account any relevant standard and rules adopted at national and Union level. The development of these methodologies should include a call for evidence supporting the drafting of the methodologies and a call for feedback on the draft methodologies, providing all interested stakeholders the possibility to contribute.
Amendment 172 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to ensure a credible and reliable certification process, carbon removal and carbon farming activities should be subject to independent third- party auditing. In particular, carbon removal and carbon farming activities should be subject to an initial certification audit before their implementation, verifying their compliance with the quality criteria set out in this Regulation, including the correct quantification of the expected net carbon removal benefit. Carbon removal and carbon farming activities should also be subject to periodic re- certification audits to verify the compliance of the generated carbon removals. To this end, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts to set out the structure, technical details, maximum price for certification audit, and the minimum information to be contained in the description of the carbon removal activity, and in the certification and re- certification audit reports.
Amendment 179 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) It is appropriate that carbon removal and carbon farming certificates underpin different end- uses, such as the compilation of national and corporate greenhouse gas inventories, including with regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council31 , the proof of climate- related and other environmental corporate claims (including on biodiversity), or the exchange of verified carbon removal units through voluntary carbon offsetting markets. To this end, the certificate should contain accurate and transparent information on the carbon removal activity, including the total removals and net carbon removal benefit and, in the case of carbon farming, biogenic emission reduction, that comply with the quality criteria set out in this Regulation. The Commission should be also empowered to adopt delegated acts to further specify or amend Annex II which lists the minimum information to be contained in the certificates. __________________ 31 Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU (OJ L 156, 19.6.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 186 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) To ensure an accurate, robust and transparent verification, certification bodies responsible for performing the certification of carbon removal activities should have the required competences and skills and should be accredited by national accreditation authorities pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 . For the purposes of the carbon farming, these national accreditation authorities should be national paying agencies. To avoid possible conflicts of interest, the certification bodies should also be completely independent from the operator carrying out the carbon removal activity that is subject to the certification. In addition, Member States should contribute towards ensuring the correct implementation of the certification process by supervising the operation of certification bodies that are accredited by national accreditation authorities, and by informing the certification schemes about relevant non-conformity findings. __________________ 32 Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30).
Amendment 188 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Certification schemes should be used by operators to demonstrate compliance with this Regulation. Therefore, certification schemes should operate on the basis of reliable and transparent rules and procedures and should ensure accuracy, reliability, integrity and non-repudiation of origin, and protection against fraud of information and of data submitted by operators. They should also ensure the correct accounting of the verified carbon removal units, notably by avoiding double counting. To this end, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts, including adequate standards of reliability, transparency, accounting and of independent auditing to be applied by certification schemes, so as to ensure the necessary legal certainty as regards the rules applicable to operators and to certification schemes. When it comes to carbon farming, for the purposes of preventing double counting, all necessary information on the carbon farming certificates should be available in the LPIS system, linked to the specific parcels benefitting from the scheme. To ensure a cost- effective certification process, those technical harmonised rules on certification should also have the objective of reducing unnecessary administrative burden for operators, or group of operators, in particular for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), including small farmers and foresters.
Amendment 193 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Certification schemes should establish and maintain interoperable public registries in order to ensure transparency and full traceability of carbon removal certificates, and to avoid the risk of fraud and double counting. Fraud may occur if more than one certificate is issued for the same carbon removal activity because the activity has been registered under two different certification schemes or has been registered twice under the same scheme. For the purposes of preventing fraud when it comes to carbon farming, parcels in the LPIS system already linked to an existing carbon farming scheme not compliant with this Regulation should not be deemed eligible for certification under this Regulation. Fraud may also occur when the same certificate is used several times to make the same claim based on a carbon removal activity or a carbon removal unit. The registries should store the documents resulting from the certification process of carbon removals, including summaries of certification audits and re-certification audit reports, the certificates and updated certificates, and make them publicly available in electronic form. The registries should also record the certified carbon removal units that meet the Union quality criteria. In order to ensure a level playing field within the single market, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing rules setting out standards and technical rules on the functioning and the inter-operability of those registries.
Amendment 203 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) To enable operators to apply the quality criteria set out in this Regulation in a standardised and cost-effective way, while taking into account the specific characteristics of different carbon removal activities, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by establishing detailed certification methodologies for different types of carbon removal activities. The Commission should also be able to amend Annex II listing the minimum information to be contained in the certificates. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate public consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and including a call for evidence and feedback, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making34 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 34 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1
Amendment 233 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘carbon removal’ means either the storage of atmospheric or biogenic carbon within geologicallitospheric carbon pools, biogenic carbon pools, long-lasting products and materials, and the marine environment, or the reduction of carbon release from a biogenic carbon pool to the atmosphere;
Amendment 253 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ‘permanent carbon storage’ means a carbon removal activity that, under normal circumstances and using appropriate management practices, stores atmospheric or biogenic carbon for several centuries, including bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, biochar carbon removal and direct air carbon capture and storage;
Amendment 266 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ‘carbon farming’ means a carbon removal activity related to landnd biogenic emission reduction activity related to land management, agriculture or forestry management that results in the increase of carbon storage in living biomass, dead organic matter and soils by enhancing carbon capture and/or reducing the release of carbon to the atmosphere;
Amendment 280 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
(o a) ‘biochar carbon removal’ means a process, where rather labile organic molecules are thermo-chemically transformed into an inert form, collectively called biochar, and safely stored in a permanent manner.
Amendment 285 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o b (new)
(o b) ‘biochar’ means a stable, porous, carbonaceous material produced through the pyrolytic treatment of organic feedstocks
Amendment 310 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. 2. In the case of carbon farming, the net carbon removal benefit shall be quantified by the following formula: Net carbon removal benefit = CRbaseline – CRtotal – GHGreduction - GHGincrease > 0where: (a) CRbaseline is the carbon removals under the baseline; (b) CRtotal is the total carbon removals of the carbon farming activity; (c) GHGincrease is the increase in direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions, other than those from biogenic carbon pools in the case of carbon farming, which are due to the implementation of the carbon farming activity; (d) GHGreduction is the emission reduction of GHG emissions accounted for in CO2 or CO2 equivalent, achieved through the implementation of the carbon farming activity. In this case, CRbaseline and CRtotal shall be understood as net greenhouse gas removals or emissions in accordance with the accounting rules laid down in Regulation (EU) 2018/841.
Amendment 374 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) they shall monitor and mitigate any risk of release of the stored carbon occurring during the monitoring period. For biochar carbon removal, they shall provide sound scientific evidence, that a reversal of a solid form (e.g. carbonates or biochar) of carbon to CO2 is prevented;
Amendment 380 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. For carbon farming and carbon storage in products, the carbon stored by a carbon removal activity shall be considered released to the atmosphere at the end of the monitoring period. For biochar carbon removal, this provision does not apply if the carbon is bound permanently in a mineral matrix (concrete) or in soil from which it cannot be separated or released For carbon farming, the carbon stored shall be considered released to the atmosphere at the end of the permanence assessment period included in the certification methodology, provided the minimum monitoring period is respected, unless the operator or the group of operators renew the period by proving the continued and uninterrupted maintenance of carbon farming activity and monitoring.
Amendment 433 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission is empowered to adopt, within the period of 6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, delegated acts in accordance with Article 16 to establish the technical certification methodologies referred to in paragraph 1 for activities related to permanent carbon storage, carbon farming and carbon storage in products. Those certification methodologies shall include at least the elements set out in Annex I. For carbon farming, the methodologies shall take into account the diversity of the soil, climate and other relevant contexts of the different Member States. Furthermore for carbon farming, any activity that sequesters carbon and achieves biogenic emission reduction on farm level can be certified. When multiple different carbon farming activities take place on farm level, a single farm certification may be done. In the delegated act, the Commission shall present carbon farming certification methodologies for at least the activities listed in Annex III. This Annex and delegated act shall be reviewed periodically to include new or innovative carbon farming activities.
Amendment 518 #
2022/0394(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I a (new)
Annex I a (new)
Amendment 47 #
2022/0390(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The pet food and prepacked pet food available on the market prior the entry into force of this Regulation and complying with the conditions referred to in Article 3(1)(a) can be sold until 6 months after entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 31 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) It would not be proportionate to impose on payment institutions and electronic money institutions an obligation to offer the service of sending and receiving instant credit transfers in euro, because those institutions cannot be admitted as participants in a payment system designated in accordance with Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council36 . Those institutions may therefore experience difficulties in accessing the infrastructure necessary to execute instant credit transfers. It is therefore appropriate to excludeallow payment institutions and electronic money institutions from the obligationto act as participants in a payment system designated in accordance with Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. A targeted amendment to Directive 98/26/EC would allow those institutions to access settlement systems and therefore be able to offer the services of sending and receiving instant credit transfers in euro. Those institutions, once in scope, would then be subject to the requirements of this Regulation. __________________ 36 Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems (OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p. 45).
Amendment 102 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
PSPs that offer to their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving credit transfers to and from accounts denominated in euro shall offer to all their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving instant credit transfers to and from accounts denominated in euro.
Amendment 104 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
PSPs in Member State whose currency is the euro that offer to their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving credit transfers shall offer to all their PSUs a payment service of sending and receiving instant credit transfers.
Amendment 107 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 5a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 115 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5a – paragraph 1a (new)
Article 5a – paragraph 1a (new)
(1a) PSPs shall be permitted to extend the execution time of instant credit transfers by the time necessary for currency-conversion with regards to instant credit transfers to and from payment accounts denominated in a currency other than euro.
Amendment 242 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 260/2012
Article 5c – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Article 5c – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 281 #
2022/0341(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2a (new)
Article 2a (new)
Directive 98/26/EC
Article 2 – point b
Article 2 – point b
Article 2a Amendment to Directive 98/26/EC In Article 2 of Directive 98/26/EC, point (b) is amended as follows: “(b) ‘institution' shall mean: i. a credit institution as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Directive 77/780/EEC (1) including the institutions set out in the list in Article 2(2) thereof, or ii. a payment institution as defined in Article 4, point (4), of Directive (EU) 2015/2366, or iii. a e-money institutions as defined in Article 2, point (1), of Directive 2009/110/EC or iv. an investment firm as defined in point 2 of Article 1 of Directive 93/22/EEC (2 ) excluding the institutions set out in the list in Article 2(2)(a) to (k) thereof, or v. public authorities and publicly guaranteed undertakings, or vi. any undertaking whose head office is outside the Community and whose functions correspond to those of the Community credit institutions, payment institutions, e-money institutions and investment firms as defined in the first, second, third and fourth indent, which participates in a system and which is responsible for discharging the financial obligations arising from transfer orders within that system. If a system is supervised in accordance with national legislation and only executes transfer orders as defined in the second indent of (i), as well as payments resulting from such orders, a Member State may decide that undertakings which participate in such a system and which have responsibility for discharging the financial obligations arising from transfer orders within this system, can be considered institutions, provided that at least three participants of this system are covered by the categories referred to in the first subparagraph and that such a decision is warranted on grounds of systemic risk;”
Amendment 246 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Use of plant protection products may have particularly negative impacts in certain areas that are frequently used by the general public or by vulnerable groups, communities in which people live and work and ecologically sensitive areas, such as Natura 2000 sites protected in accordance with Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council67and Council Directive 92/43/EEC68such as parks, urban areas and urban areas covered by watercourse or water feature. If plant protection products are used in areas used by the general public, the possibility of exposure of humans to such plant protection products is high. In order to protect human health and the environment, the use of plant protection products in sensitive areas and within 3 metres of such areas, should therefore be prohibited. Derogations from the prohibition should only be allowed under certain conditions and on a case-by-case basis. _________________ 67 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7). 68 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7).
Amendment 274 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Statistical data on plant protection products collected in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council74should be used in calculating these harmonised risk indicators and progress towards achieving binding Union and national targets based on the Farm to Fork Strategy. Given that pesticide use fluctuates between years depending, in particular, on the weather, a three year baseline period is appropriate to take account of such fluctuations. The baseline period for the calculation of harmonised risk indicators 1 and 2 is 2011–2013, as this was the first three year period for which data was received by the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 and coincides with the entry into force of Directive 2009/128/EC. The baseline period for the calculation of progress towards the Union 2030 reduction targets is 2015–1-2017, as this was the three most recent years for which data was available at the time of the announcement of the Farm to Fork Strategy3 to take into account the achievements already made by European farmers. The baseline period for the calculation of a new harmonised risk indicator 2a is 2022–2024, as this will be the first three year period for which data on the areas treated under each authorisation for an emergency situation in plant protection will be available. _________________ 74 Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides (OJ L 324, 10.12.2009, p. 1).
Amendment 291 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 recognises the need for urgent action to protect biodiversity. There is evidence of a widespread reduction of species, in particular insects and pollinators, in the Union. Biodiversity loss is, amongst other factors, driven by the inappropriate use of plant protection products, while Member States actions under current Union policy instruments have not yet been able to stop this trend of biodiversity loss. It is therefore essential to ensure that plant protection products are used in such a way as to mitigate the risk of harmful effects of such products on wildlife, through a number of measures including training, inspection of application equipment in professional use and protection of the aquatic environment and sensitive areas.
Amendment 384 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point a
(a) an area used by the general public, such as a public park or garden, recreation or sports grounds, or a public path;
Amendment 426 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point f – point iii
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point f – point iii
Amendment 465 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall contribute, through the adoption and achievement of national targets in accordance with Article 5 to achieving by 2030 a 530 % Union-wide reduction of both the use and risk of chemical plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 1’) and the use of more hazardous plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 2’), compared to the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173 (collectively referred to as ‘the Union 2030 reduction targets’), with exemption to bio- based plant protection products.
Amendment 501 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
By … [OP: please insert the date – 6 months after the date of application of this Regulation] each Member State shall adopt national targets in its national legislation to achieve by 2030 a reduction set in accordance with this Article, from the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173, of the following:
Amendment 511 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Use of plant protection products may have particularly negative impacts in certain areas that are frequently used by the general public or by vulnerable groups, communities in which people live and work and ecologically sensitive areas, such as Natura 2000 sites protected in accordance with Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council67 and Council Directive 92/43/EEC68 such as parks, urban areas and urban areas covered by watercourse or water feature. If plant protection products are used in areas used by the general public, the possibility of exposure of humans to such plant protection products is high. In order to protect human health and the environment, the use of plant protection products in sensitive areas and within 3 metres of such areas, should therefore be prohibited. Derogations from the prohibition should only be allowed under certain conditions and on a case-by-case basis. __________________ 67 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7). 68 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7).
Amendment 551 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Amendment 574 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) 35at least 10% where a Member State’s weighted intensity of use and risk of chemical plant protection products during the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173 is less than 70% of the Union average;, with exemption to bio-based plant protection products
Amendment 581 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) at least 350% where a Member State’s weighted intensity of use and risk of chemical plant protection products during the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173 is between 7100% and 140% of the Union average; , with exemption to bio-based plant protection products
Amendment 583 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) Statistical data on plant protection products collected in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council74 should be used in calculating these harmonised risk indicators and progress towards achieving binding Union and national targets based on the Farm to Fork Strategy. Given that pesticide use fluctuates between years depending, in particular, on the weather, a three year baseline period is appropriate to take account of such fluctuations. The baseline period for the calculation of harmonised risk indicators 1 and 2 is 2011–2013, as this was the first three year period for which data was received by the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 and coincides with the entry into force of Directive 2009/128/EC. The baseline period for the calculation of progress towards the Union 2030 reduction targets is 2015–1-2017, as this was the three most recent years for which data was available at the time of the announcement of the Farm to Fork Strategy3 to take into account the achievements already made by European farmers. The baseline period for the calculation of a new harmonised risk indicator 2a is 2022–2024, as this will be the first three year period for which data on the areas treated under each authorisation for an emergency situation in plant protection will be available. __________________ 74 Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides (OJ L 324, 10.12.2009, p. 1).
Amendment 590 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) 655% where a Member State’s weighted intensity of use and risk of chemical plant protection products during the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173 is more than 140% of the Union average., with exemption to bio-based plant protection products
Amendment 603 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 – point a
(a) where a Member State has achieved a greater reduction in the use and risk of chemical plant protection products than the Union average between the average of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the average of the years 20158, 20169 and 201720, a figure that is established by subtracting from 50% the difference between the reduction achieved and the Union average reduction;the levels applied according to paragraphs 5, subparagraph 2, points (b) and (c).
Amendment 604 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3 – point b
Amendment 620 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 recognises the need for urgent action to protect biodiversity. There is evidence of a widespread reduction of species, in particular insects and pollinators, in the Union. Biodiversity loss is, amongst other factors, driven by the inappropriate use of plant protection products, while Member States actions under current Union policy instruments have not yet been able to stop this trend of biodiversity loss. It is therefore essential to ensure that plant protection products are used in such a way as to mitigate the risk of harmful effects of such products on wildlife, through a number of measures including training, inspection of application equipment in professional use and protection of the aquatic environment and sensitive areas.
Amendment 621 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) 35at least 10% where a Member State’s intensity of use of the more hazardous plant protection products during the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173 is less than 70% of the Union average;, with exemption to bio-based plant protection products
Amendment 630 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) at least 350% where a Member State’s intensity of use of the more hazardous plant protection products during the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173 is between 7100% and 140% of the Union average;, with exemption to bio- based plant protection products
Amendment 640 #
2022/0196(COD)
(c) 655% where a Member State’s intensity of use of the more hazardous plant protection products during the average of the years 20151, 20162 and 20173 is more than 140% of the Union average., with exemption to bio-based plant protection products
Amendment 651 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 – point a
(a) where a Member State has achieved a greater reduction in the use of the more hazardous plant protection products than the Union average between the average of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the average of the years 20158, 20169 and 201720, a figure that is established by subtracting from 50% the difference between the reduction achieved and the Union average reductionthe levels applied in paragraph 6, subparagraph 2, points (b) and (c);
Amendment 652 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 3 – point b
Amendment 727 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. Having assessed the level of national 2030 reduction targets of all Member States set in accordance with Article 5, the Commission shall verify whether their average at least equals 50% so acorresponds to achieve the corresponding Union 2030 reduction target. and whether the achievement of this objective will not have negative impact on EU food security.
Amendment 735 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Article 6 – paragraph 7
Amendment 762 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 August of each calendar year, the Commission shall publish on a website the average trends in progress towards achieving the Union 2030 reduction targets. These trends shall be calculated as the difference between the average of the years 20151-20173 and the year ending 20 months prior to the publication. The trends shall be calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Annex I.
Amendment 950 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) all trends in progress towards achieving the national 2030 reduction targets as set out in Part 1 of Annex II, calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Annex I as the difference between the average of the years 20151-20173 and the year ending 20 months prior to the publication;
Amendment 1357 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 5
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1 shall share the data gathered under paragraph 1, points (a) and (c), of this Article with the national competent authorities in charge of the implementation of Directives 2000/60/EC and (EU) 2020/2184 for cross-linking that data, in anonymised form and in a secure way, with environmental, groundwater and water quality monitoring data, to enhance the identification, measuring and reduction of risks from the use of plant protection products.
Amendment 1900 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
This Regulation is the instrument used to achieve the pesticide reduction targets contained in the Farm to Fork Strategy by requiring each Member State to contribute to achieving by 2030 a 530 % Union-wide reduction of both the use and risk of chemical plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 1’), with exemption to bio-based plant protection products and the use of more hazardous plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 2’), with exemption to bio-based plant protection products. This Regulation also regulates the contribution of each Member State to these Union targets. Each Member State contribution, set in the form of a national target, to Union 2030 reduction target 1 is referred to as a ‘national 2030 reduction target 1’, while a Member State contribution to Union 2030 reduction target 2 is referred to as a ‘national 2030 reduction target 2’. The methodology for calculating progress towards achieving these targets is set out below:
Amendment 2177 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 18 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) if necessary for the protection of the general public and vulnerable groups, the obligation to display notices regarding use of plant protection products on the perimeter of the area to be treated, and any specific form such display is to take;
Amendment 2185 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7
Article 18 – paragraph 7
7. AIf necessary for the protection of the general public and vulnerable groups, a professional user that has been granted a permit to use a plant protection product in a sensitive area shall display notices to that regard on the perimeter of the area to be treated in the form indicated in the permit.
Amendment 2753 #
2022/0196(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex I – paragraph 1 – introductory part
This Regulation is the instrument used to achieve the pesticide reduction targets contained in the Farm to Fork Strategy by requiring each Member State to contribute to achieving by 2030 a 530 % Union-wide reduction of both the use and risk of chemical plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 1’) and the use of more hazardous plant protection products (‘Union 2030 reduction target 2’). This Regulation also regulates the contribution of each Member State to these Union targets. Each Member State contribution, set in the form of a national target, to Union 2030 reduction target 1 is referred to as a ‘national 2030 reduction target 1’, while a Member State contribution to Union 2030 reduction target 2 is referred to as a ‘national 2030 reduction target 2’. The methodology for calculating progress towards achieving these targets is set out below:
Amendment 132 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
Amendment 190 #
Amendment 265 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
Recital 49
(49) Sustainable, resilient and biodiverse agricultural ecosystems are needed to provide safe, sustainable, nutritious and affordable food. Biodiversity-rich agricultural ecosystems also increase agriculture’s resilience to climate change and environmental risks, while ensuring food safety and security and creating new jobs in rural areas, in particular jobs linked to organic farming as well as rural tourism and recreation. Therefore, the Union needs to improve the biodiversity in its agricultural lands, through a variety of existing practices beneficial to or compatible with the biodiversity enhancement, including extensive agriculture. Extensive agriculture as well invest in innovative practices to enhance productivity and avoid indirect land use change that would have adverse effects on biodiversity outside the European Union, in particular in high value tropical ecosystems. Sustainable agro-ecological intensification is vital for the maintenance of many species and habitats in biodiversity rich areas. There are many extensive agricultural practices which have multiple and significant benefits on the protection of biodiversity, ecosystem services and landscape features such as precision agriculture, organic farming, agro-ecology, agroforestry and low intensity permanent grassland.
Amendment 266 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Geo-political developments have further underlined the need to safeguard the resilience of food systems.62 Evidence shows that restoring agro-ecosystems has positive impacts on food productivity in the long-term, and that the restoration of nature acts as an insurance policy to ensure the EU’s long-term sustainability and resilience. Securing biodiversity and maintaining food production are intrinsically linked. Prime examples of such synergies are the sustainable management of fishing stocks for fisheries and the benefit of soil fertility and pollinators in agriculture. However, those synergies can only be optimised if food producers, such as farmers and fishers, are continuously involved and consulted in relation to the development of relevant measures. _________________ 62 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European, Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Safeguarding food security and reinforcing the resilience of food systems, COM (2022) 133 final.
Amendment 279 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51
Recital 51
(51) Since farmland birds are well- known and widely recognised key indicators of the health of agricultural ecosystems, it is appropriate to set targets for their recovery. The obligation to achieve such targets would apply to Member States, not to individual farmers. Member States should achieve those targets by putting in place effective restoration measures on farmland and appropriate measures also in other ecosystems used by farmland birds for nesting and feeding, working with and supporting farmers and other stakeholders for their design and implementation on the ground. Since many farmland birds are migratory birds, cooperation at Union level and with third countries should be strengthen to improve the status of these populations.
Amendment 295 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Directive 92/43/EEC aims to maintain and restore, at favourable conservation status, natural habitats and species of wild fauna and flora of Union interest. However, it does not set a deadline for achieving that goal. Similarly, Directive 2009/147/EC does not establish a deadline for theDirective 2009/147/EC aims to recovery of bird populations in the Union.
Amendment 297 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Deadlines should therefore be established for putting in place restoration measures within and beyond Natura 2000 sites, in order to gradually improve the condition of protected habitat types across the Union as well as to re-establish them until the favourable reference area needed to achieve favourable conservation status of those habitat types in the Union is reached. In order to give the necessary flexibility to Member States to put in place large scale restoration efforts, it is appropriate to group habitat types according to the ecosystem to which they belong and set the time-bound and quantified area-based targets for groups of habitat types. This will allow Member States to choose which habitats to restore first within the groupMember States should be further supported in taking measures to meet their obligations to improve the condition of protected habitat types across the Union to achieve favourable conservation status of those habitat types in the Union, as is their obligation under existing nature legislation such as Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC.
Amendment 309 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) In order to ensure that the restoration measures are efficient and that their results can be measured over time, it is essential that the areas that are subject to such restoration measures, with a view to improving the condition of habitats that fall within the scope of Annex I to Directive 92/43/EEC, to re-establish those habitats and to improve their connectivity, show a continuous improvement until good condition is reached. However, a continuous improvement should not be made legally binding, since Member States cannot always prevent there will be a year in which the conditions of habitats lowers, due to various natural circumstances.
Amendment 314 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) It is also essential that the areas that are subject to restoration measures with a view to improving the quality and quantity of the habitats of species that fall within the scope of Directive 92/43/EEC, as well as habitats of wild birds falling within the scope of Directive 2009/147/EC, show a continuous improvement to contribute to the achievement of a sufficient quantity and quality of the habitats of such species. However, a continuous improvement should not be made legally binding, since Member States cannot always prevent there will be a year in which the conditions of habitats lowers, due to various natural circumstances.
Amendment 331 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) It is important that Member States take measures with the aim to prevent that the areas covered by habitat types falling within the scope of this Regulation do not, deteriorate as compared to the current situation, considering the current restoration needs and the necessity not to further increase the restoration needs in the future. It is, however, appropriate to consider the possibility of force majeure, which may result in the deterioration of areas covered by those habitat types, as well as unavoidable habitat transformations which are directly caused by climate change, or as a result of a plan or project, or needs of overriding public interest, for which no less damaging alternative solutions are available, to be determined on a case by case basis, or of a plan or project authorised in accordance with Article 6(4) of Directive 92/43/EEC.
Amendment 370 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the continuous, long-term and sustained recovery of biodiverse and resilient nature across the Union’s land and sea areas through the restoration of damaged ecosystems;
Amendment 375 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) achieving the Union’s overarching objectives concerning climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation, food security and sustainable development;
Amendment 388 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation establishes a framework within which Member States shall put in place, without delay, effective and area-based restoration measurenational plans which together shall cover, by 2030, at least 20 % of the Union’s land and sea areas and, by 2050, all ecosystems in need of restoration.
Amendment 399 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) Restoration measures need to be put in place to enhance the biodiversity of agricultural ecosystems across the Union, including in the areas not covered by habitat types that fall within the scope of Directive 92/43/EEC. In the absence of a common method for assessing the condition of agricultural ecosystems that would allow setting specific restoration targets for agricultural ecosystems, it is appropriate to set a general obligationupport Member States in taking measures to improve biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems and measure the fulfilment of that obligationprogress on the basis of existing indicators.
Amendment 402 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1 a) „degraded ecosystem“ means an ecosystem where a persistent reduction in the capacity to provide ecosystem services occured;
Amendment 408 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘restoration’ means the process of actively or passively assisting the recovery of an ecosystem towards or to good condition, of a habitat type to the highest level of condition attainable and toin which the habitat its favourable reference area, of a habitat of a species to a sufficient quality and quantity, or of species populations to satisfactory levels, as a means of conserving or enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem resilienceable to provide ecosystem services again;
Amendment 421 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘good condition’ means a state where the key characteristics of an ecosystem, namely its physical, chemical, compositional, structural and functional state, and its landscape and seascape characteristics, reflect the high level of ecological integrity, stability and resilience necessary to ensure its long-term maintenance and production capacity;
Amendment 427 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘sufficient quality of habitat’ means the quality of a habitat of a species which allows the ecological requirements of a species to be met at any stage of its biological cycle so that it is maintaining itself on a long-term basis as a viable component of its habitat in its natural range; The sufficient quality of habitat must be realistically achievable. If the Member State has already set targets on the basis of the Habitats and Birds directive, these areas shall be understood as favourable reference areas;
Amendment 430 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘sufficient quantity of habitat’ means the quantity of a habitat of a species which allows the ecological requirements of a species to be met at any stage of its biological cycle so that it is maintaining itself on a long-term basis as a viable component of its habitat in its natural range; If the Member State has already set targets on the basis of the Habitats and Birds directive, these areas shall be understood as favourable reference areas;
Amendment 462 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessaryappropriate and reasonable restoration measures inside the Natura 2000 network to improve to good condition areas of habitat types listed in Annex I which are not in good condition. Such measures shall (following the development of a revised Union-wide methodology for the assessment of habitat types and species protected under Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC). The measures listed must be in place by 2035 on at least 30 % of the total area of each group ofAnnex I habitat types listed in Annex Iand will be implemented mainly within Natura 2000 areas that isare not in good condition, (as quantified in the national restorationcovery plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, on at least 60 % by 2040, and on at least 90 % by 2050).
Amendment 479 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall put in placeimplement the restoration measures that are necessary to re-establishstore the habitat types listed in Annex I in areas not covered by those habitat typeswhere these habitat types do not occur, provided that their restoration is possible under current climatic conditions and that suitable and sufficient areas for their restoration are available, and after making available data on the habitat types referred to in Article 2(1). Such measures shall be in placemplemented on areas representing at least 30 % of the additional overall surfacetotal area needed to reachieve the totaoverall favourable reference area of each group ofstatus of the habitat type groups listed in Annex I, as quantified in the national restorationcovery plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030. In addition, at least 60 % of that surfacearea by 204035, and 100 % of that surfacet least 60 % by 2045 and 90 % by 20505.
Amendment 483 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. the Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC . Member States shall put in place the restoration measures for the terrestrial, coastal and freshwater habitats of the species listed in Annexes II, IV and V to IV of Directive 92/43/EEC and inside Natura 2000 areas, and put in place the restoration measures for the terrestrial, coastal and freshwater habitats of the species listed in Annex II Directive 92/43/EEC and of the terrestrial, coastal and freshwater habitats of wild birds covered by Directive 2009/147/EC that are necessary to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats, including by re- establishing them, and to enhance connectivity, until sufficient quality and quantity of those habi until sufficient quality and quantity to reach favourable condition or show a strong positive trend for 30 % of the species is achieved, and in line with long-term projection of changing natural ranges. These measures act within the framework of objectives adopted by member states is achievedbased on the Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC .
Amendment 501 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article shall be based on the best available knowledge, , taking also into account socio-economic impact, professional practice and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex I, measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance including their typical species, as referred to in Article 1(e) of Directive 92/43/EEC, and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. Areas where the habitat types listed in Annex I Consideration of costs and cost-effectiveness is necessarey in unknown condition shall be considered as not being in good conditionprioritising and allocating restoration measures.
Amendment 509 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The restoration measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall consider the need for improved connectivity between the habitat types listed in Annex I and take into account the ecological requirements of the species referred to in paragraph 3 that occur in those habitat types.
Amendment 513 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall ensure that the areas that are subject to restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 show a continuous improvement in the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex I until good condition is reached, and a continuous improvement of the quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3, until the sufficient quality of those habi. For Natura 2000 sites referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 where good status is reachhas been achieved., Member States shall ensure that areas in which good condition has been reached, and in which the sufficient quality of the habitats of the species has been reached, dotheir status does not deteriorate.
Amendment 526 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
Article 4 – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall ensure that areas where the habitat types listed in Annex I occur inside Natura 2000 do not deteriorate.
Amendment 539 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the continuous, long-term and sustained recovery of biodiverse and, resilient natureand productive ecosystems across the Union’s land and sea areas through the restoration of ecosystems;
Amendment 539 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point a
(a) force majeure, including natural disasters;
Amendment 544 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) unavoidable habitat transformations or other relevant circumstances which are directly caused by climate change; or
Amendment 546 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) achieving the Union’s overarching objectives concerning climate change mitigation and, climate change adaptation, energy security and food security, and moving towards a circular bio-economy;
Amendment 550 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point c
(c) a project of overriding public interest for which no less damaging alternative solutions are available, to be determined on a case by case basis, to be defined in the national restoration plan.
Amendment 570 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation establishes a framework within which Member States shall put in place, without delay, effective and area-based restoration measures which together shall cover, by 2030, at least 20 % of habitats in bad condition of the Union’s land and sea areas and, by 2050, all ecosystems in need of restoration.
Amendment 581 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation establishes a framework within which Member States shall put in place, without delay, effective and area-based restoration measures which together shallith the aim to jointly cover, by 2030, at least 20 % of the Union’s land and sea areas and, by 2050, all ecosystemhabitats in need of restoration.
Amendment 605 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘restoration’ means the process of actively or passively assisting the recovery of an ecosys habitat by taking measures that contributem towards or to good condition, of a habitat type to the highest level of condition attainable and to its favourable reference area and to its favourable reference area to meet a favourable status as defined in article 1(e) of Directive 92/43/EEC, of a habitat of a species to a sufficient quality and quantity, or of species populations to satisfactory levels, as a means of conserving or enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem resilience;
Amendment 622 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘good condition’ means a state where the key characteristics of an ecosystem, namely its physical, chemical, compositional, structural and functional state, and its landscape and seascape characteristics, reflect the high level of ecological integrity, stability and resilience necessary to ensure its long-term maintenance and delivery of a wide range of ecosystem services;
Amendment 637 #
2022/0195(COD)
(5) ‘favourable reference area’ means the total area of a habitat type in a given biogeographical region or marine region at national level that is considered the minimum necessary to ensure the long- term viability of the habitat type and its species, and all its significant ecological variations in its natural range, notably taking into account variations due to pressures of climate change, and which is composed of the area of the habitat type and, if that area is not sufficient, the area necessary for the re-establishment of the habitat type;
Amendment 644 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘sufficient quality of habitat’ means the quality of a habitat of a species which allows the ecological requirements of a species to be met at any stage of its biological cycle so that it is maintaining itself on a long-term basis as a viable component of its habitat in its natural range, while taking into account the proportionality of means to achieve this status, as well as possible trade-offs with competing species;
Amendment 654 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) ‘sufficient quantity of habitat’ means the quantity of a habitat of a species which allows the ecological requirements of a species to be met at any stage of its biological cycle so that it is maintaining itself on a long-term basis as a viable component of its habitat in its dynamic natural range;
Amendment 690 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall, with regard to taking into account social and economic considerations, put in place the restoration measures necessaryappropriate and reasonable to enhance biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems, in addition to the areas that are subject to restoration measures under Article 4(1), (2) and (3), while taking into account climate change and ensuring economically viable agricultural production.
Amendment 704 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to improve towards good condition areas of habitat types listed in Annex I which are not in good conditionunder existing designation within the Natura 2000 network and not in good condition, taking into account possible trade-offs due to the need to achieve a balanced provision of a wide variety of ecosystem services. Such measures shall be in place on at least 30 % of the area of each group of habitat types listed in Annex I that is not in good condition, as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, on at least 60 % by 2040, and on at least 90 % by 2050.
Amendment 706 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall achieve an increasing trendthe monitoring at national level of each of the followingthe biodiversity indicators in agricultural ecosystems, as further specified in Annex IV, measured in the period from the date of entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2030, and every three years thereafter, untilset out in Annex 1 to Regulation 2021/2115, defined by the Member States in the sNatisfactory levels, identified in accordance with Article 11(3), are reached:onal Restoration Plan.
Amendment 714 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to improve to good condition areas of habitat types within the Natura 2000 areas listed in Annex I which are not in good condition. Such measures shall be in place on at least 30 % of the area of each group of habitat types within the Natura 2000 areas listed in Annex I that is not in good condition, as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, on at least 60 % by 2040, and on at least 90 % by 2050.
Amendment 714 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 717 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to improve to good condition areas of habitat types listed in Annex I which are not in good condition. Such measures shall be put in place on at least 30 % of the area of each group of habitat types listed in Annex I that is not in good condition, as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, on at least 60 % by 2040, and on at least 90 % by 2050.
Amendment 720 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 726 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 728 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Amendment 735 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to re-establish the habitat types listed in Annex I in areas not covered by those habitat types. Such measures shall be in place oin areas representing at least 30 % of the additional overall surface needed to reach the total favourable reference area of each group of habitat types listed in Annex I, as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, at least 60 % of that surface by 2040, and 100 % of that surface by 2050.necessary to ensure fulfilment of the goals laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article;
Amendment 738 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall inside the Natura 2000 areas put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to re-establish the habitat types listed in Annex I in areas not covered by those habitat types. Such measures shall be in place on areas within the Natura 2000 areas representing at least 30 % of the additional overall surface needed to reach the total favourable reference area of each group of habitat types listed in Annex I, as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, at least 60 % of that surface by 2040, and 100 % of that surface by 2050.
Amendment 743 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall, within Natura 2000 sites and other strictly protected areas, put in place the restoration measures for the terrestrial, coastal and freshwater habitats of the species listed in Annexes II, IV and V to Directive 92/43/EEC and of the terrestrial, coastal and freshwater habitats of wild birds covered by Directive 2009/147/EC that are necessary to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats, including by re-establishing them, and to enhance connectivity, until sufficient quality and quantity of those habitats is achieved. When designing the measures referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article, Member States shall, to the largest extent possible, plan the measures so as current and future economic activity in the areas can take place and spatial planning is not disproportionately hampered, in order to address current and future challenges such as climate change, food security, affordable housing and infrastructure development.
Amendment 748 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) 110 by 20305, 120 by 20405 and 130 by 20505, for Member States listed in Annex V with historically more depleted populations of farmland birds;
Amendment 749 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures for the terrestrial, coastal and freshwater habitats of the species listed in Annexes II, IV and V to Directive 92/43/EEC and of the terrestrial, coastal and freshwater habitats of wild birds covered by Directive 2009/147/EC that are necessary to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats, within Natura 2000 sites and other strictly protected areas, including by re- establishing them, and to enhance connectivity, until sufficient quality and quantity of those habitats is achieved.
Amendment 755 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) 105 by 20305, 110 by 20405 and 115 by 20505, for Member States listed in Annex IV with historically less depleted populations of farmland birds.
Amendment 758 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex I, measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance including their typical species, as referred to in Article 1(e) of Directive 92/43/EEC, and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. Areas where the habitat types listed in Annex I are in unknown condition shall be considered as not being in good conditionthe Member State concerned shall rectify that data gap in accordance with Article 11(1). When determining the most suitable areas referred to in paragraph 4, Member States shall take into account socio-economic aspects as well as ensuring that future spatial planning will not be disproportionately hampered. Member States shall also utilise the full potential of coordination and synergies of designating those areas within Natura 2000 sites and other strictly protected areas.
Amendment 760 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States shall include the indicators refered to in para 2. in the review of their National resstoration plans from the date of entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2030, and every [5] years thereafter.
Amendment 766 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 769 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. The determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex I, measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance including their typical species, as referred to in Article 1(e) of Directive 92/43/EEC, and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. AFor areas where the habitat types listed in Annex I are in unknown condition shall be considered as not being in good condition, measures shall be taken to assess their condition and to identify if restoration measures are required.
Amendment 776 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Amendment 779 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The restoration measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall consider the need for improved connectivity between the habitat types listed in Annex I and take into account the ecological requirements of the species referred to in paragraph 3 that occur in those habitat types, as well as possible trade-offs between requirements of competing species and habitat types.
Amendment 787 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6
Article 4 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall ensure that the areas that are subject to restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 show a continuous improvement in the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex I untiltowards good condition is reached, and a continuous improvement of the quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3, until the sufficient quality of those habitats is reached. Member States shall ensureput in place measures to prevent that areas in which good condition has been reached, and in which the sufficient quality of the habitats of the species has been reached, do not deteriorate, taking into account shifting climatic conditions and natural ranges due to ongoing climate change.
Amendment 788 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Amendment 799 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
Article 4 – paragraph 7
Amendment 803 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
Article 4 – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall ensure that areas where the habitat types listed in Annex I occur do not deterioratput in place measures to prevent that areas designated in the Natura 2000 network where the habitat types listed in Annex I occur do not deteriorate, taking into account shifting climatic conditions and natural ranges due to ongoing climate change.
Amendment 806 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Amendment 821 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8
Article 4 – paragraph 8
Amendment 823 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
In addition, Member States may put in place restoration measures to rewet organic soils that constitute drained peatlands under land uses other than agricultural use and peat extraction and count those rewetted areas as contributing, up to a maximum of 230%, to the achievement of the targets referred to in the first subparagraph, points (a), (b) and (c).
Amendment 828 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. Outside Natura 2000 sites, the non- fulfilment of the obligations set out in paragraphs 61, 2, 3 and 76 is justified if it is caused by:
Amendment 841 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) unavoidable habitat transformations which are directlyfor example caused by climate change, third countries, non-preventable pests and diseases, natural disasters; or
Amendment 883 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 9 – introductory part
9. For Natura 2000 sites, the non- fulfilment of the obligations set out in paragraphs 61, 2, 3 and 76, is justified if it is caused by:
Amendment 886 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare national restoration plans and carry out the preparatory monitoring and research needed to identify the restoration measures that are necessary to meet the targets and obligations set out in Articles 4 to 10, taking into account the latest scientific evidence, practice and local conditions, the efficient allocation of costs and the prioritisation of restoration measures. At the same time, appropriate stakeholder involvement at each stage of the process is necessary.
Amendment 900 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i
(i) the total habitat area and a map of its current distribution, including outside of the Member State territory;
Amendment 902 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 9 – point b
(b) unavoidable habitat transformations which are directlyfor example caused by climate change:, third countries, non-preventable pests and diseases, natural disasters; or
Amendment 904 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 9 – point b
(b) unavoidable habitat transformations which are directly caused by climate change, including measures necessary for climate change adaptation: or
Amendment 913 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
(iii) the favourable reference area taking into account the documented losses over at least the last 70 years and the projand the expected changes toin environmental conditions due to climate change;
Amendment 925 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the sufficient quality and quantity of the habitats of the species required for achieving their favourable conservation status, taking into account the areas most suitable for re-establishment of those habitats, and the connectivity needed between habitats in order for the species populations to thrive, as well as ongoing and projected changes to environmental conditions due to climate changs well as ongoing and projected changes to environmental conditions due to climate change, and the actual area available, taking into consideration the competing needs of the habitats and species as well as current land use.
Amendment 932 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 10 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 10 – point a
(a) an increase of habitat area in good condition for habitat types listed in Annex I until at least 90 % is in good condition and until the favourable reference area for each habitat type in each biogeographic region of their territory is reached, taking into account changes of natural range due to climate change;
Amendment 935 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall set, by 2030 at the latest, satisfactory levels for each of the indicators referred to in Articles 8(1), 9(2) and 10(2), through an open and effective process and assessment, based on the latest scientific evidence the progress of climate change, practice and local conditions, the economic viability of agriculture and taking into account food security issues in the European Union, as well as the participation of all relevant stakeholders, and, if available, the framework referred to in Article 17(9) considering the complexity of the financing provided to achieve these driving values.
Amendment 945 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall develop their methodology for identifying and map the agricultural and forest areas in need ofping areas in need of restoration. In particular those areas that need to enhance connectivity and landscape diversity as a result of infrastructure measures. The type/scope of measures leading to the recommended restoration, in particular the areas that, due to intthese areas and the method of compensating for restrictions on use will be determined in agreement with the owner of the area concerned. Affected landowners should be adequately informed and should be an integral part of the mapping and idenstification or other management factors, are in need of enhanced connectivity and landscape diversityf these lands. To this end, the competent authority, to be designated by the Member State, will seek contractual arrangements with landowners or other beneficial owners to ensure the implementation, restriction or omission of private law management and use of the land.
Amendment 952 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to improve to good condition areas of habitat types listed in Annex II which are not in good condition. Such measures shall be put in place on at least 30 % of the area of each group of habitat types listed in Annex II that is not in good condition, as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, on at least 60 % by 2040, and on at least 90 % by 2050.
Amendment 955 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Member States shall identify synergies with climate change mitigation,promote policy coherence and cooperation for sustainable development and enhance positive synergies and address trade-offs with other policy areas, including climate change adaptation and disaster prevention, and prioritise restorationcovery measures accordingly. Member States shall also take into account:
Amendment 974 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures that are necessary to re-establish the habitat types listed in Annex II in areas not covered by those habitat types. Such measures shall be in place oin areas representing at least 30 % of the additional overall surface needed to reach the total favourable reference area of each group of habitat types, as quantified in the national restoration plan referred to in Article 12, by 2030, at least 60 % of that surface by 2040, and 100 % of that surface by 2050.necessary to ensure fulfilment of the goals laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article;
Amendment 986 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall, within Natura 2000 sites and other strictly protected areas, put in place the restoration measures for the marine habitats of species listed in Annex III and in Annexes II, IV and V to Directive 92/43/EEC and for the marine habitats of wild birds covered under Directive 2009/147/EC, that are necessary in order to improve the quality and quantity of those habitats, including by re- establishing them, and to enhance connectivity, until sufficient quality and quantity of those habitats is achieved. When designing the measures referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article, Member States shall, to the largest extent possible, plan the measures so that current and future economic activity in the areas can take place and spatial planning is not disproportionately hampered, in order to address current and future challenges such as climate change, food security, affordable housing and infrastructure development.
Amendment 988 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 9
Article 11 – paragraph 9
9. Member States shall, when preparing the national restoration plans, aim at optimisadjusting the ecological, economic and social functions of ecosystems while respecting ownership rights, as well as their contribution to the sustainable development of the relevant regions and local communities.
Amendment 993 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4
Article 5 – paragraph 4
4. The determination of the most suitable areas for restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall be based on the best available knowledge and the latest scientific evidence of the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex II, measured by the structure and functions which are necessary for their long-term maintenance, including their typical species, referred to in Article 1(e) of Directive 92/43/EEC, and of the quality and quantity of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3. Areas where the habitat types listed in Annex II are in unknown condition shall be considered as not being in good conditionthe Member State concerned shall rectify that data gap in accordance with Article 11(1). When determining the most suitable areas referred to in paragraph 4, Member States shall take into account socio-economic aspects as well as ensure that future spatial planning will not be disproportionately hampered. Member States shall also utilise the full potential of coordination and synergies of designating those areas within Natura 2000 sites and other strictly protected areas.
Amendment 996 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 11
Article 11 – paragraph 11
11. Member States shall ensure that the preparation of the restoration plan is open, inclusive and effective, with the need for cooperation and active involvement of landowners in accordance with the principle of prior and informed consent, and that the public has early and effective opportunities to participate in its development and that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in its elaboration. Consultations shall comply with the requirements set out in Articles 4 to 10 of Directive 2001/42/EC.
Amendment 1012 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 6
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall aim to ensure that the areas that are subject to restoration measures in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 show a continuous improvement in the condition of the habitat types listed in Annex II until good condition is reached, and a continuous improvement of the quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 3 until the sufficient quality of those habitats is reached. Member States shall ensure that areas in which good condition has been reached and in which the sufficient quality of the habitats of the species has been reached do not deteriorattotal national area in good condition and the total amount of area with a sufficient quality of the habitats of the species referred to in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 do not decrease over time.
Amendment 1028 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 7
Article 5 – paragraph 7
Amendment 1050 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
8. Outside Natura 2000 sites, the non- fulfilment of the obligations set out in paragraphs 61, 2, 3 and 76 is justified if caused by:
Amendment 1062 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) unavoidable habitat transformations which are directlyfor example caused by climate change, third countries, non-preventable pests and diseases, natural disasters; or
Amendment 1071 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – point c
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – point c
(c) a project of private or public overriding public interest for which no less damaging and beneficial social efficient alternative solutions are available, to be determas defined oin a case by case basis.the national restoration plan; or
Amendment 1098 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 9 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 9 – introductory part
9. For Natura 2000 sites, the non- fulfilment of the obligation set out in paragraphs 61, 2, 3 and 76, is justified if caused by:
Amendment 1114 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 9 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 9 – point b
(b) unavoidable habitat transformations which are directlyfor example caused by climate change:, third countries, non-preventable pests and diseases, natural disasters; or
Amendment 1134 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 10
Article 5 – paragraph 10
Amendment 1168 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure, in close cooperation with regional authorities, aim to prevent that there is noa net loss of urban green space, at national level, and of urban tree canopy cover by 2030, compared to 2021, in all cities and in towns and suburbs.
Amendment 1188 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall ensure that , in close cooperation withe re is angional authorities, aim to increase in the total national area and quality of urban green space in cities and in towns and suburbs of at least 3 % of the total area ofand urban tree canopy cover in cities and ofin towns and suburbs in 2021, by 2040, and at least 5 % by 2050. In addition Member States shall ensuraim to increase:
Amendment 1193 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) a minimum of 10 %net gain of urban tree canopy cover in all cities and in towns and suburbs by 2050at national level; and
Amendment 1211 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Amendment 1218 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Amendment 1222 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1226 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
Article 19 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1235 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
Article 19 – paragraph 5
Amendment 1259 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall remove the barriers to longitudinal and lateral connectivity of surface waters identified under paragraph 1 of this Article, in accordance with the plan for their removal referred to in Article 12(2), point (f). When removing barriers, Member States shall primarily address obsolete barriers, which are those that are no longer needed for renewable energy generation, inland navigation, water supply or other uses.
Amendment 1270 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – row 4
Annex IV – row 4
Share of agricultural land with high- diversity landscape features Description: High-diversity landscape features are elements of permanent natural or semi-natural vegetation present in an agricultural context which provide ecosystem services and support for biodiversity. In order to do so, landscape features need to be subject to as little external disturbances as possible to provide safe habitats for various taxa, and therefore need to comply with the following conditions: a) they cannot be under productive agricultural use (including grazing or fodder production, except extensive grazing and/or maintenance mowing that favours biodiversity), and b) they should not receive fertilizer or pesticide treatment. Land lying fallow and semi-natural grasslands can be considered as high diversity landscape features if it complies with criteria (a) and (b) above. Productive trees part of arable land agroforestry systems and productive elements in non- productive hedges can also be considered as high diversity landscape features, if they comply with criterion (b) above, and if harvests take place only at moments where it would not compromise high biodiversity levels. Unit: Percent (share of Utilised Agricultural Area). Methodology: as developed under indicator I.21, Annex I of Regulation 2021/2115, as based on LUCAS for landscape elements, Ballin M. et al., Redesign sample for Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS), Eurostat 2018, and for land laying fallow, Farm Structure, Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure, online publication, Eurostat.
Amendment 1288 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall by 2030 have put in place measures to reverse the decline of pollinator populations by 2030 and achieve thereafter an increasing trend of pollinator populations, measured every three years after 2030implementing the measures, until satisfactory levels are achieved, as set out in accordance with Article 11(3).
Amendment 1289 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place measures to reverse the decline of pollinator populations by 2030 and to achieve thereafter an increasing trend of pollinator populations, measured every three years after 2030, until satisfactory levels are achieved, as set out in accordance with Article 11(3).
Amendment 1315 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures necessary to enhance biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems, in addition to the areas that are subject to restoration measures under Article 4(1), (2) and (3), while duly taking into account effects on and trade-offs with food production, food security and food prices.
Amendment 1322 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shallestablish measures with the aim of achieveing an increasing trend at national level of each of the following indicators in agricultural ecosystems, as further specified in Annex IV, measured in the period from the date of entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2030, and every three years thereafter, until the satisfactory levels, identified in accordance with Article 11(3), are reached:
Amendment 1323 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall put in place measures to achieve an increasing trend at national level of each of the following indicators in agricultural ecosystems, as further specified in Annex IV, measured in the period from the date of entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2030, and every three years thereafter, until the satisfactory levels, identified in accordance with Article 11(3), are reached:
Amendment 1358 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) share of agricultural landland in rural areas with high-diversity landscape features.
Amendment 1370 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States shall put in place restoration measures to ensure thatachieve a positive trend in the common farmland bird index at national level based on the species specified in Annex V, indexed on … [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] = 100, reaches the following levels:.
Amendment 1374 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States shall put in place restoration measures to ensurewith the aim that the common farmland bird index at national level based on the species specified in Annex V, indexed on … [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] = 100, reaches the following levels:
Amendment 1375 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 1381 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 1394 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
For organic soils in agricultural use constituting drained peatlands, Member States shall put in place restoration measures. Those measures shall be in place on at least:, including where appropriate rewetting. Member States shall determine relevant areas based on best scientific knowledge and on a consultation of concerned stakeholders.
Amendment 1398 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
For organic soils in agricultural use constituting drained peatlands, Member States shall put in place restoration measures, while ensuring synergies with agricultural production. Those measures shall be in place on at least:
Amendment 1406 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Amendment 1422 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Amendment 1441 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Amendment 1468 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. the non-fulfilment of the obligations set out in this article is justified if it is caused by: (a) force majeure; (b) unavoidable habitat transformations which are for example caused by climate change, third countries, non-preventable pests and diseases; or (c) a project of overriding public interest, including those of a social or economic nature, for which no less damaging alternative solutions are available.
Amendment 1479 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place the restoration measures necessary to enhance biodiversity of forestimprove the long-term resilience of forest ecosystems, their biodiversity and provision of a wide range of ecosystem services, in addition to the areas that are subject to restoration measures pursuant to Article 4(1), (2) and (3).
Amendment 1491 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States shall achieve an increasing trend at national level of each of the following indicators in forest ecosystems, as further set out in Annex VI, that are locally relevant to assess the long-term resilience and based on best available scientific knowledge, measured in the period from the date of entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2030, and every three years thereafter, until the satisfactory levels identified in accordance with Article 11(3) are reached:.
Amendment 1501 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 1507 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 1515 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 1521 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 1531 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e
Amendment 1539 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
Amendment 1588 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall prepare national restoration plans and carry out the preparatory monitoring and, research needed and due consultation of all relevant stakeholders to identify the restoration measures that are necessary and achievable by appropriate means to meet the targets and obligations set out in Articles 4 to 10, taking into account the latest scientific evidence.
Amendment 1610 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii
(iii) the favourable reference area taking into account the documented losses over at least the last 70 years and scientifically justified period of time, the projected changes to environmental conditions due to climate change;
Amendment 1622 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iv
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iv
(iv) the areas most suitable for the re- establishment of habitat types in view of ongoing and projected changes to environmental conditions due to climate change and considering the long-term balance of the provision of a locally relevant range of ecosystem services ;
Amendment 1628 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the sufficient quality and quantity of the habitats of the species required for achieving their favourable conservation status, taking into account the areas most suitable for re-establishment of those habitats, and the connectivity needed between habitats in order for the species populations to thrive, as well as ongoing and projected changes to environmental conditions due to climate change and possible trade-offs with regard to requirements of competing species and habitat types.
Amendment 1655 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall set, by 2030 at the latest, satisfactory levels for each of the indicators referred to in Articles 8(1), 9(2) and 10(2), through an open and effective process and assessment, based on the latest scientific evidence, consultation of relevant stakeholders and, if available, the framework referred to in Article 17(9).
Amendment 1669 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall put in place methodology and guidelines to identify and map the agricultural and forest areas in need of restoration, in particular the areas that, due to intensification or other management factors, are in need of enhanced connectivity and landscape diversity.
Amendment 1673 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Member States shall identify synergies and trade-offs with climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation and disaster prevention, disaster prevention and other socio-economic ecosystem services, notably food production and other productive functions contributing to the circular bio-economy, and prioritise restoration measures accordingly. Member States shall also take into account:
Amendment 1674 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Member States shall identify synergies and potential conflicts with food production and ensuring food security, as well as synergies and potential conflicts with climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation and disaster prevention and prioritise restoration measures accordingly. Member States shall also take into account:
Amendment 1684 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
(ca) bio-economy and circular economy strategies on EU and national level.
Amendment 1718 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7 – point g a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 7 – point g a (new)
(ga) national forest programmes or national forest strategies.
Amendment 1735 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 8
Article 11 – paragraph 8
8. Member States shall, when preparing the national restoration plans, make use ofconsider the different examples of restoration measures listed in Annex VII, depending on specific national and local conditions, and the latest scientific evidence.
Amendment 1742 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 9
Article 11 – paragraph 9
9. Member States shall, when preparing the national restoration plans, aim at optimising the ecological, economic and social functions of ecosystems, while fully respecting ownership rights, as well as their contribution to the sustainable development of the relevant regions and communities.
Amendment 1761 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 11
Article 11 – paragraph 11
11. Member States shall ensure that the preparation of the restoration plan is open, inclusive and effective, that affected stakeholders are consulted from an early stage throughout the process and that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in its elaboration. Consultations shall comply with the requirements set out in Articles 4 to 10 of Directive 2001/42/EC.
Amendment 1800 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an indication of the measures to ensurehat aim to prevent that the areas covered by the habitat types listed in Annexes I and II do not deteriorate in the areas in which good condition has been reached and that an indication of the measures aim to prevent that the habitats of the species referred to in Articles 4(3) and 5(3) do not deteriorate in the areas in which the sufficient quality of the habitats of the species has been reached, in accordance with Articles 4(6) and 5(6);
Amendment 1803 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an indication of the measures to ensureprevent that the areas covered by the habitat types listed in Annexes I and II do not deteriorate in the areas in which good condition has been reached and that the habitats of the species referred to in Articles 4(3) and 5(3) do not deteriorate in the areas in which the sufficient quality of the habitats of the species has been reached, in accordance with Articles 4(6) and 5(6);
Amendment 1808 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) an indication of the measures to ensureprevent that the areas covered by habitat types listed in Annexes I and II do not deteriorate, in accordance with Article 4(7) and Article 5(7);
Amendment 1809 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) an indication of the measures to ensurehat aim to prevent that the areas covered by habitat types listed in Annexes I and II do not deteriorate, in accordance with Article 4(7) and Article 5(7) on a national level;
Amendment 1828 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the estimated co-benefits for or trade-offs with climate change mitigation and relevant ecosystem services, notably food production and other ecosystem services contributing to a circular bio- economy, associated with the restoration measures over time, as well as wider socio- economic benefits or trade-offs of those measures;
Amendment 1830 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the estimated co-benefits for climate change mitigation and food production associated with the restoration measures over time, as well as wider socio- economic benefits of those measures;
Amendment 1841 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point l
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point l
(l) the estimated financing needs and identified funding outside the Common Agricultural Policy, including where applicable market-based solutions, for the implementation of the restoration measures, which shall include the description of the support to stakeholders affected by restoration measures or other new obligations arising from this Regulation, and the means of intended financing, public or private, including (co-) financing with Union funding instruments;
Amendment 1849 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point l a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point l a (new)
(la) a description of existing and possible additional programmes which contribute to the development of business models that contribute to the goals of this regulation, including for the fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture sectors;
Amendment 1862 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point n
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point n
(n) a summary of the process for preparing and establishing the national restoration plan, including information on public participation and of how the needs of local communities, landowners and stakeholders have been considered and how property rights have been respected;
Amendment 1867 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point o a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point o a (new)
(oa) the estimated financing needs for the implementation of the restoration measures, which shall include the description of the support to stakeholders and in particularly private landowners affected by restoration measures or other new obligations arising from this Regulation, and the means of intended financing, public or private, including (co-) financing with Union funding instruments as well as a description on how the national plans will respect the private property rights according to national regulation and secure full compensation for economical or property disadvantages and losses;
Amendment 1892 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Member States shall submit a draft of the national restoration plan referred to in Articles 11 and 12 to the Commission by… [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation]. The Commission may grant, upon the request of a Member State, extension of the time limit for submission of the draft national restoration plan. Such a request shall duly justify the delay and clearly outline what the additional time is needed for. The approval of such a request shall neither hamper the effectiveness of the Commission to assess the synergies between different Member States' national restoration plans nor risk the achievement of the targets set in this Regulation.
Amendment 1944 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall review their national restoration plan at least once every 10 years, in accordance with Articles 11 and 12, taking into account progress made in the implementation of the plans, the best available scientific evidence as well as available knowledge of changes or expected changes in environmental conditions, including those due to climate change. The Member States shall in particular review the favourable reference areas needed to achieve the objectives of this Regulation, taking into account the best available scientific knowledge and challenges in spatial planning.
Amendment 1982 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that members of the public, affected businesses and landowners, in accordance with national law, that have a sufficientlegitimate interest or that maintain the impairment of a right, have access to a review procedure before a court of law, or an independent and impartial body established by law, to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of the national restoration plans and any failures to act of the competent authorities, regardless of the role members of the public have played during the process for preparing and establishing the national restoration plan.
Amendment 2060 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 17 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission may adopt implementingdelegated acts to:
Amendment 2322 #
2022/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex VII – point 16
Annex VII – point 16
(16) Increase the agricultural area subject to agro-ecological management approaches such as organic agriculture or agro-forestry, regenerative farming, carbon farming, non-tillage farming, multicropping and crop rotation, integrated pest and nutrient management.
Amendment 29 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 b (new)
Recital 3 b (new)
(3 b) The Directive should take into account the challenges related to the sustainability of Member States’ public finances in the short term and therefore, avoid leading to substantial losses in Member States’ revenues.
Amendment 38 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In order to avoid a misuse of the deduction of the allowance on equity, it is necessary to lay down specific anti-tax avoidance rules. Such rules should target, in particular, schemes put in place to circumvent the conditions on which an equity increase qualifies for an allowance under this Directive, for instance, through the intra-group transfer of participations in associated enterprises. Such rules should also target schemes put in place to claim an allowance in the absence of any equity increase at group level. For example, intra- group debt financing or contributions in cash could be used for these purposes. Specific anti-tax avoidance rules should also prevent schemes from being put in place to claim that an increase in equity, and the corresponding allowance, is higher than it actually is, for example, through an increase in loan financing receivables or overvaluation of assets. Moreover, the general anti-tax abuse rule in Article 6 of Council Directive (EU) 2016/116415 applies against abusive acts which are not covered by the specific anti-tax avoidance framework of this Directive. Member States should also make sure the measures taken in the framework of this Directive are compliant with the Code of Conduct Group on Business Taxation. _________________ 15 Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (OJ L 193, 19.7.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 43 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) To effectively address the tax- related debt-equity bias in a manner sustainable for the Union’s public finances, an allowance for equity financing should be accompanied by a limitation on the deductibility of debt financing costs, except for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. An interest limitation rule should therefore limit the deductibility of exceeding borrowing costs and apply independently from the allowance. Given the different objectives between such a rule and the existing anti-tax avoidance rule on interest limitation of Article 4 of Directive (EU) 2016/1164, both rules should be maintained. Taxpayers should first calculate the deductibility of exceeding borrowing costs under this Directive and then under ATAD. In the event that the latter results in a lower amount of deductible exceeding borrowing costs, the taxpayer should deduct this lower amount and carry forward or back any difference between the two amounts in accordance with Article 4 of ATAD. This provision should be consistent with Directive 2016/1164 so that it does not hamper EU’s attractiveness to investors, or adds any complexity for companies.
Amendment 87 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. When implementing this Directive, Member States shall make sure the measures adopted are compliant with the guidance provided by the Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) on notional interest deduction regimes.
Amendment 100 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 December 2027, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report shall review and assess the impact of this Directive on SME’s access to financing and on tax revenues in Member States, and whether there is a need to amend this Directive. Where appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by a review with a view to increasing the effectiveness of this Directive and a legislative proposal amending this Directive.
Amendment 101 #
2022/0154(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 December 2027, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report shall pay special attention to the link with other company tax legislation, namely a Directive ensuring a minimum effective tax rate for the global activities of large multinational groups and a Directive on Framework for Income Taxation in Europe (BEFIT).
Amendment 25 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas it is essential to ensure that consumers and food services are in a position to make informed choices when purchasing food;
Amendment 37 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas organic farming has a potential to contribute to environmental protection and biodiversity and at the same time revitalise rural areas, creating employment, supporting the sustainability of small farms, bringing consumers and producers closer, enhancing the connections with the local economy and stimulating positive economic multipliers;
Amendment 73 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the development and growth of the organic sector must be accompanied by market-driven and accompanied by holistic supply chain developments as well as measures to stimulate further the demand for organic food and ensure consumer trust, in order to safeguard the future profitability of the organic market and organic farming in the EU;
Amendment 76 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that stimulating agricultural sustainability and resilience of the EU foodsystem should be a priority; underlines that co-existence of different farming systems is important as diversity is key to food system security and resilience and benefits sustainable development; points out that there is no single farming model that fits all countries and regions and stresses that the benefits of the different sustainable farming models should be recognised;
Amendment 88 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that for an EU action plan to succeed, it must stimulate and mobilise the Member States; expresses the view, therefore, that Member States should be encouraged to develop their own national OAPs with concrete, time-bound action objectives, incentives, actions, time-frames and budgets;
Amendment 105 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that Member States should engage all stakeholders, especially organic farmers and associations, local and regional authorities, consumer and private sector representatives and, the hospitality and food industryies, in a consultative process when adopting their national OAPs to achieve the best possible synergies;
Amendment 123 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises the importance of speeding up the development of organic aquaculture and wild organic picking areas in the EU;
Amendment 128 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Is of the opinion that legislation and OAPs must provide sufficient room for flexibility for Member States' different organic practices and prerequisites, such as climate zones and length of growing seasons;
Amendment 129 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses the need for modern and innovative methods when developing new organic seeds and agriculture practices, maintaining high level of protection of human health and the environment;
Amendment 130 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6a. Expresses its concern about misleading labels, packaging and advertising that makes it difficult for consumers to distinguish conventional products from organic products; emphasizes that the terms 'locally produced' or 'regionally produced' should only be used if the main ingredients of the food product concerned are actually from that region, and that the terms 'authentic' or 'natural' should never be allowed for industrially processed foods;
Amendment 139 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Supports the Commission in further promoting the EU organic logo among consumers, including through organic school schemese promotion of local and organic logos that exists in several Member States and are used together with the EU organic logo; emphasises that it is of paramount importance that consumer surveys on organics are followed by actions to further raise awareness of organic farmingproduction;
Amendment 145 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Supports promoting the consumption of organic food in European schools as it can be an important driver for the development of the organic sector;
Amendment 146 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Reminds that demands from professional kitchens differ from those of the households; stresses the importance to create added value for the supply chain and increase the processing level of organic products to respond for the needs of professional kitchens;
Amendment 159 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Points out that local and regional authorities play an important role in supporting the structuring of the organic sector in terms of production, logistics and trade, facilitating the creation of organised cooperation between producers, food services and consumers, as well as raising public awareness at local levelbout the differences between various sustainable farming methods and developing educational programmes for preschools and schools;
Amendment 183 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that concrete action to promote exports of EU organic products is needed; acknowledge, in this regard, the potential of the existing EU promotion policy for organic production; underlines that any promotion policy should recognise the wide range of sustainable production methods, practises and products in the EU; requests that the Commission report regularly on forthcoming negotiations with the EU’s trading partners to inform Parliament about the potential for expansion of the organic market;
Amendment 206 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that an adequate common agricultural policy (CAP) budget should be provided to create incentives for farmers to convert to and maintainfurther develop organic farming practices at national level, through rural development measures or newly introduced eco-schemes, or a combination of the two; calls on the Member States to support generational renewal in organic farming;
Amendment 257 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Recognise the potential of a common European agriculture data space to increase the consumer knowledge and trust as well as to make the organic supply chain traceable;
Amendment 264 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need for research and innovation to overcome restrictions in organic agriculture, such as the availability of organic protein feed, vitamins, plant protection products, fertilisers and genetic resources and to encourage meeting societal expectations on animal welfare and efficient resource use; reminds the importance of livestock manure as an organic fertilizer and encourages its sustainable use in the cultivation cycle; welcomes the Commission’s intention to earmark Horizon Europe funding in this respect; calls on the Commission to stimulate and foster cooperation between research communities working on organic and conventional food and farming;
Amendment 275 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines that bio-fertilizers and bio-based soil improvers are important components of organic farming practices; stresses therefore the need to incentivise innovation with regard to the production of bio-fertilizers and bio-based soil improvers from various types of biomass waste such as animal manure and food waste;
Amendment 282 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Stresses the need to support the development of safe, effective and affordable alternative to plant protection products as an important element of the development of organic production;
Amendment 289 #
2021/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Highlights the importance of sufficiently available, high-quality organic seeds, heterogeneous material and high- yielding plant varieties, also varieties that are locally adopted; points out their potential in strengthening resilience against plant diseases and the impact of climate change; encourages the Commission and the Member States to step up efforts to improve the functioning of the organic seed market and believes that transitional periods would be helpful in achieving this;
Amendment 3 #
2021/2201(INI)
— having regard to the OECD draft new tax transparency framework for crypto-assets (CARF) and amendments to the Common Reporting Standard 1a which were submitted to public consultation, _________________ 1a https://www.oecd.org/tax/exchange-of- tax-information/public-consultation- document-crypto-asset-reporting- framework-and-amendments-to-the- common-reporting-standard.pdf
Amendment 139 #
2021/2201(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that it is necessary to amend the scope of the Directive on Administrative Cooperation5 (DAC8) so that European legislators can further assess if other categories of income and assets such as crypto-assets are to be included; calls on the OECD to adopt without any further delay a new definition of a reporting standards and exchange of information which should then be included in the revised DAC 8; thereafter encourages the Commission to present the DAC8 proposal without any delay; _________________ 5 Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, OJ L 64, 11.3.2011, p. 1.
Amendment 2 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
— having regard to Articles 3, 4, 13, 38, 43 and 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 10 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
Citation 9
— having regard to the Commission communication of 11 December 2019 on the European Green Deal (COM(2019)0640) and the European Parliament resolution of 15th of January 2020 on this communication,
Amendment 11 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
— having regard to the Commission communication of 20 May 2020 entitled ‘A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system’ (COM(2020)0381) and the European Parliament resolution of 20th of October 2021 on this communication,
Amendment 12 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
Citation 11
— having regard to the Commission communication of 20 May 2020 entitled ‘EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 – Bringing nature back into our lives’ (COM(2020)0380), and the European Parliament resolution of 9th of June 2021 on this communication
Amendment 14 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
— having regard to the Special Eurobarometer 515 on EU Consumer Habits Regarding Fishery and Aquaculture Products from 2021,
Amendment 15 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 b (new)
Citation 14 b (new)
— having regard to the PECH Committee Study on “Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on EU fisheries and aquaculture” form 07 July 2021,
Amendment 29 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the European Green Deal, the Biodiversity Strategy and the Farm to Fork Strategy aim to achieve a carbon neutral Europe by 2050 and make food systems fair, healthy and environmentally friendly across the Union; whereas aquaculture can provide healthy food with a smaller climate and environmental footprint than that of non-aquatic land- based farming;
Amendment 30 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas the EU Strategic Guidelines for a More Sustainable and Competitive EU Aquaculture (2021), the FAO Shanghai Declaration: Aquaculture for food and sustainable development (2021), and the OIE Aquatic Animal Health Code (2021) establish animal welfare objectives in aquaculture to support producers and consumers;
Amendment 36 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the FAO 2020 report on the state of world fisheries and aquaculture indicates that globally, the proportion of women in the total aquaculture work force (19 %) is larger than that in fisheries (12 %) and that overall, women play a crucial role throughout the fish and aquaculture value chain and provide labour in both relating to both general commercial practices and artisanal practices;
Amendment 37 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas one in four of every seafood product consumed in Europe comes from aquaculture, and considering that 70 % of seafood consumption comes from importswhere between 2018 and 2019 per capita apparent consumption of farmed products registered a 2% increase; whereas considering that in 2019, the EU self- sufficiency for fish and seafood was 41,2%, only 10 % of EU seafood consumption comes from EU aquaculture;
Amendment 40 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas nearly two thirds of Europeans in 2021 did eat fishery or aquaculture products at home at least once a month, this is a decreasing trend compared to figures from 2018; whereas consumers in 2021 were divided regarding wild or farmed products where around a third preferred wild products and a similar proportion did not have a preference;
Amendment 42 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas some initial estimates point to a 17 % reduction in sales volume and an 18 % reduction in total income, with a particularly harsh impact on the shellfish segment;
Amendment 47 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the European Market Observatory for fisheries and aquaculture’s fishmeal and fish oil report from September 2021 indicates that most fishmeal in aquaculture feed is consumed in Asia and that in 2019, 34 % of fishmeal was used in China, 35 % in other Asian countries and 9 % of fishmeal was used in Europe; whereas 20 million tonnes of wild fish are captured for non-human feed purposes; whereas there is increasing competition for fishmeal on the global animal feed markets between aquaculture and livestock producers; whereas higher feed prices will imply that onlyenhances the need for further development of alternative feed products as well as feed- efficient andcy to ensure profitability for high-valued aquaculture products can be profitable with such inputs;
Amendment 56 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the population of cormorants has seen a massive increase; whereas this increase in the number of cormorants causes serious damage to many marine sectors, including aquaculture;
Amendment 59 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas the resolution on the adoption of a European Cormorant Management Plan to minimise the increasing impact of cormorants on fish stocks, fishing and aquaculture, adopted 13 years ago, proposed several possible actions to solve the problems that cormorants continues to posed;
Amendment 87 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Emphasizes the importance of proper and coordinated implementation of the Guidelines by member States in order to achieve their objectives; points out the importance of the role of the Commission to assist and coordinate the implementation among Member States to ensure a level playing field for EU aquaculture farmers; encourages the Commission to continuously follow the implementation of these Guidelines and other legal acts affecting Aquaculture such as the Regulation on organic production and labelling of organic products and if appropriate present amendments to this Regulation, and potentially others, addressing hurdles hampering the realisation of EU objectives on organic production, such as those set out in the Farm to Fork Strategy;
Amendment 89 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the potential of the aquaculture sector’s contributions to achieving the objectives of the European Green Deal, and highlights the need to ensure the long-term sustainability and resilience of the sector, notably in the light of the COVID-19 crisis; considers that the transition to a sustainable food system in Europe needs to include the aquaculture sector as an importantake advantage of the untapped potential in the aquaculture sector as it can play an important and even bigger part of the circular economy and as a net contributor to excess nutrient transformation in high-quality protein;
Amendment 95 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that aquaculture is expected to contribute to food supply and food security by rebalancing the fish gap, since the EU needs to import 70 % of all the aquatic food it consumes and that causes an annual EUR 21 billion trade deficit (in 2019); considers that aquaculture has sizeable growth potential that needs to be enhanced, so that it can provide sustainable and quality food products, reduce our dependence on aquatic food imports and create more jobs and other socio-economic services, especially in coastal regions but also rural areas; calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide a predictable, streamlined and business- friendly legal framework, and making full use of the available financing resources of the European Maritime Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF), as this is the only environment under which these aquaculture contributions can occur;
Amendment 100 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Points out the importance of precise data and statistics for Aquaculture products, especially in relation to consumption, imports and exports, in order to ensure that we are reaching the targets and objectives we are setting for the sector; calls for more data to be made available and accessible in this regard;
Amendment 107 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the establishment of the new EU aquaculture assistance mechanism as an innovative tool to aid the Commission, Member States, industry and other stakeholders to develop further guidance and consolidate best practices on different relevant areas; considers that all relevant stakeholders, including Parliament, should be involved in the creation of this mechanism, in particular all members of the Aquaculture Advisory Council, in accordance with Article 11 TEU that recognises participatory democracy as a fundamental democratic principle; calls for the creation of meaningful dialogue with civil society;
Amendment 113 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the growth potential of the EU aquaculture sector needs to be developed in a sustainable manner, taking all three pillars of sustainability – economic, social and environmental – into consideration; points out the need to have an attractive and market-oriented sector, also attracting new fish farmers, sector with a legal framework for attracting business investments and protecting the environment by using sustainable feed sources, improving aquatic health and biosecurity, reducing the burden of disease and encouraging the responsible and prudent use of antimicrobials;
Amendment 118 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the aquaculture sector is capable of providing a consistent contribution to ecosystem services for society, and algae and, shellfish and pond farming especially can contribute to decarbonising the EU economy and mitigating climate change; supports the proposed actions on climate change but highlights the need for a common methodology to measure the carbon footprint of individual aquaculture farms and requests an impact assessment for all the proposed measures; including their impact on individual aquaculture sectors;
Amendment 126 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to facilitate, encourage and provide adequate support for environmentally friendly aquaculture, such as organic farmsaquaculture, closed-system aquaculture, algae, shellfish, pond fish farming and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture systems;
Amendment 133 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates the need for a food traceability system in the EU that enhances the sustainability of the aquaculture sector and responds to consumer demands by providing information on where, when, how and what fish or seaaquatic food has been farmed, primarily to improve food safety but also to enable checks throughout the chain of both EU products and imports from outside the EU and to combat fraud; believes that this system should involve all actors in the value chain, so that they can collaborate with one another using digital systems, artificial intelligence and other technological innovations;
Amendment 138 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to support green business models, such as those based on carbon sequestration, in order to make supply chains more sustainable; stresses, in this regard, that certain aquaculture practices, such as mussel or oyster farming, can be successful models for the future, in the context of the Emissions Trading System emission credit systems, in the context of EU climate legislation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to support this type of green business in the light of the strategy’s objectives;
Amendment 142 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that the operations of the aquaculture sector should commit to actively applying evidence-based standards and interventions to improve fish welfare, including maintaining water quality within welfare and environmental-relevant limits, as a way of reducing the prevalence and spread of diseases, which diminishes the need for antibiotics and lowers pollution levels; highlights that the aquaculture sector shoulde importance of continueing to improve farming methods in line with the most up-to-date scientific knowledge available in order for the sector to achieve better environmental results, resilience against climate change and the optimisation of resource use;
Amendment 150 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Member States to continue encouraging the promotion of algae farming without neglecting the more conventional aquaculture farmed species; considers that restoring and better managing seaweed populations could be an effective way, in addition to farming algae, to combat eutrophicationand facilitate the use and development of algae as food and feed, including by enabling easier authorisation processes, without neglecting the more conventional aquaculture farmed species; highlights that there are untapped potential in algae farming for creating new jobs and providing ecosystem services and removre excess carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus from waternvironmentally friendly food and feed;
Amendment 155 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Considers that restoring and better managing seaweed populations could be an effective way, in addition to farming algae, to combat eutrophication and remove excess carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus from water;
Amendment 160 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that national plans for the sustainable development of aquaculture take into account the characteristics of both marine and fresh water aquaculture as well as general barriers to the development of the potential of the sector and to recognise the need to allocate space to aquaculture through appropriate spatial planning; highlights the importance of a transparent and participative mechanism, in line with Directive 2014/89/EU on maritime spatial planning, for allocating space, including to existing and new fishing grounds and aquaculture farms, to all stakeholders in an equitable manner;
Amendment 162 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Supports the aim of the Commission to initiate promotion campaigns to encourage consumption of EU-Aquaculture products and highlight EU Aquaculture and to further supports its sustainable development; highlights the need in this regard for comprehensive and easy to access consumer information including on healthy diets, environmental benefits and other sustainability parameters such as climate impact;
Amendment 167 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that the development of aquaculture requires both a solid, reliable and clear, clear and administratively simple legal framework for the use of space and licences that provides confidence and security for investment in the sector; stresses that spatial planning should result in an effective and flexible plan that considers the ever-changing marine and freshwater environments within which aquaculture functions, and that overly restrictive zoning may deter investment and development;
Amendment 176 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the importance of sustainable feed ingredients for aquaculture in the Union; considers that aquaculture can only fill the fish gap if all species farmed provide a net gain in fish protein, meaning that aquaculture does not remove more wild fish from the oceans for feed requirements than it produces; stresses the need to use ecologically sustainable marine proteins and oils, by-products and trimmings, other proteins and innovative solutions, such as insect meal and microalgae, and the partial replacement of marine proteins and oils with non-marine alternatives; calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote responsible and sustainable practices and increase the percentage of independently certified fishmeal and fish oil within feeds, with certification done by a credible and independent environmental and social certification scheme, such as the one by the Marine Stewardship Council, that uses low trophic index assessment criteria and the FAO code of conductinvest in research and innovation in order to promote a transition to sustainable and new sources of protein and asks the Commission to assess if any legislative changes are needed in this regard;
Amendment 179 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote responsible and sustainable practices and increase the percentage of independently certified fishmeal and fish oil within feeds, with certification done by a credible and independent environmental and social certification scheme, such as the one by the Marine Stewardship Council, that uses low trophic index assessment criteria and the FAO code of conduct;
Amendment 180 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Acknowledges the fact that it is not currently possible to provide enough fishmeal and fish oil to aquaculture with just discards and by-products from the fishing industry, in part because of increasing competition withidemand on the fishmeal market; calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure sustainable fishmeal and fish oil production and to jointly step up efforts on research and innovation to solve this particular problemproblem of increased demand on the fishmeal market by developing sustainable alternatives;
Amendment 188 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to acknowledge the importance of conducting EU-wide communication campaigns about the EU aquaculture sector and the importance of production with funds under direct management in line with the objectives of the strategic guidelines; calls on the Member States and the Commission to include the organisation of information and communication campaigns in all operational programmes, in line with the objectives of the strategic guidelines, on specific subsectors of the EU aquaculture sector;
Amendment 194 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Urges the Commission and the Member States to substantially increase funds for research and innovation in the aquaculture sector, specially new knowledge fields such as the study of the microbiome or the scientific monitoring of aquaculture environmental services; calls on the Commission and Member States to enhance the transfer of science-based knowledge to industry and other stakeholders and the transfer of operational knowledge from industry and stakeholders to the scientific community;
Amendment 202 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Commission to work further on levelling the playing field through the revision of internationalfor EU-Aquaculture vis-a-vis third country producers through its trade agreements, including updating rules for the better implementation of aquatic food labelling; considers that, in specific cases such as caviar labelling, the legal framework on information for consumers should be revised; calls on the Commission to analyse the inclusion of sustainable aquaculture sectors in the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in order to create incentives for European industries and EU trade partners to decarbonise their industries and therefore support both EU and global climate policies towards greenhouse-gas neutrality, and at the same time, without being discriminatory or constituting a disguised restriction on international trade;
Amendment 208 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Stresses the need to improve the availability of veterinary medicines for the aquaculture sector in order to be able to comply with the proposed actions on fish health and welfare; calls on the Commission to support scientific knowledge on fish welfare, proCalls on the Commission to support scientific knowledge on fish welfare, promote best aquaculture practices on fish wellbeing and promote the creation of EU reference centres for fish welfare; Stresses that good animal welfare is the best preventive step to reduce the need for medicines and to ensure fish health and welfare, encourages further use of technologies and innovation to address illnesses in a motre best aquaculture practices on fish wellbeing and promote the creation of EU reference centres for fish welfaretargeted fashion reducing the amount of medicine needed; stresses the need to improve the availability of veterinary medicines, when needed, for the aquaculture sector;
Amendment 214 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Supports increasing the capacity of Copernicus and the European Marine Observation and Data Network to observe, model and forecast to better anticipate the effects of extreme weather events both on land and at sea to which aquaculture facilities are especially sensitive;
Amendment 219 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to implement the measures proposed in the resolution on the adoption of a European Cormorant Management Plan and in addition to update measures based in the most recent scientific advice for the benefit of the aquaculture sector, the biodiversity and the environment; calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish effective and permanent measures to regulate the number of cormorants and other fish predators to reduce their economic, environmental and social impact on aquaculture; considers riticises the fact that only some of Parliament’s demands have been fulfilled through the actions of the Commission, such as the guidance document for applying derogations under Article 9(1) of the Birds Directive, the CorMan Project and the EU Cormorant Platform; calls onurges the Commission to include the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) in Annex II, Part A of the Birds Directive, which consists of a list of species that may be hunted under national legislation;
Amendment 223 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the actions related to aquaculture in the Commission communication on an action plan for the development of organic production and the 23 actions included in its annex; points out that market based organic aquaculture needs toshould play a key role in the planned growth of the aquaculture sector, given its ample untapped potential for development, in line with the transition to a sustainable food system in Europe, and which should be given assistance through the EMFAF;
Amendment 225 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Agrees with the objective of a significant increase in organic aquaculture by 2030 without setting any concrete percentage in this plan, given that this is a relatively new sector and its growth is not easy to predict, however encourages Member States to set targets, if appropriate, taking into account their knowledge of local- and regional specificities and market development; points out that although EU organic aquaculture has experienced an increase in the farming of certain species and in certain countries in recent years (including, salmon in Ireland and mussels in Denmark and Ireland), the demand for EU organic aquaculture is uncertain and, moreover, the economic performance of organic aquaculture is still not sufficient in some areas;
Amendment 227 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Considers that sustainable aquaculture, in general, and organic aquaculture , in particular, will play a key role in meeting the EU’s ambition for a carbon neutral Europe by 2050 by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and contributing to climate change mitigation, while supplying additional benefits to the environment and biodiversity;
Amendment 229 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Points out that sustainable aquaculture, in general, and organic aquaculture, in particular, canit can also help meet consumer demands for diversified high- quality food produced in a way that respects the environment and ensures fish welfare, thereby filling the gap between demand and supply of fishery products in the EU, and relieving pressure on wild stocks;
Amendment 232 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Calls on the Member States to include, based on an ex-ante impact assessment an increase in organic aquaculture among the objectives of their reviewed multi-annual national strategic plans for aquaculture; considers that the EMFAF should be used to promote sustainable aquaculture practices, such as organic production, and finance income lossesto provide support during the conversion period, which would level the playing field with respect to other organic farmers;
Amendment 234 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that organic aquaculture faces unique obstacles, as well as those faced by the conventional aquaculture sector, which need to be addressed accordingly; stresses the need to identify and address the specific obstacles to the development of organic aquaculture, including different approaches to fish farming, in the Union immediately;
Amendment 235 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32 a. Highlights that innovation, including different types of Aquaculture has developed since the Regulation on organic production and labelling of organic products were adopted; points out in this regard that the certain provisions, such as provisions on reproduction, are ill equipped for the new innovative and sustainable Aquaculture methods developed; asks the Commission to assess this Regulation in this regard and present necessary amendments to the legislation;
Amendment 239 #
2021/2189(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Urges the Commission to consider re-authorising the use of 30 % of the daily ration of fishmeal and fish oil from non- organic aquaculture trimmings, or trimmings of fish caught for human consumption that come from sustainable EU fishery products, for a transitional period of five years for all newcomers in the organic aquaculture sector, given its positive impact on the circular economy and as a necessary support measure in view of the lack and high prices of organic feed;
Amendment 29 #
2021/2188(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the common fisheries policy (CFP) seeks to guarantee the proper conservation and management of marine biological resources and ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities contribute to environmental, social andare environmentally sustainable in the long term and are managed in a way that is consistent with the objectives of achieving economic, sustainability;ocial and employment benefits, and of contributing to the availability of food supplies,
Amendment 253 #
2021/2188(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Believes it necessary to promote sustainable aquaculture models that could contribute to the conservation of ecosystems affording protection against the effects of climate change; underlines the importance of differentiating between production and protein-processing aquaculture, particularly when the latter involves practices that put pressure on the sustainability of marine resources in other parts of the world;considers that feedstuffs intended for fisheries and aquaculture should be produced by sustainable agriculture and fishing, and should therefore exclude any product obtained from IUU fishing or overfishing; considers that the production of microalgae can reduce the use of non- sustainable fishmeal in fisheries,
Amendment 6 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. Having regard to the Commission communication of 20 May 2020 entitled ‘A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system’ (COM(2020)0381),
Amendment 10 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
B b. Having regard to the Commission communication of 18 February entitled “ Trade Policy Review - An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy” (COM(2021) 66 final),
Amendment 13 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B c (new)
Recital B c (new)
B c. Having regard to the WTO’s condemnation of India’s sugar subsidies in its recent panel report “India – Measures Concerning Sugar and Sugarcane”,
Amendment 14 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B d (new)
Recital B d (new)
Amendment 72 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls, in accordance with the Farm to fork strategy, that any future trade agreement between India and the European Union should include a dedicated framework on sustainable agri- food systems and products;
Amendment 73 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Recalls that India continues in protectionist policies regulating exports and constantly imposing import restrictions and technical barriers to trade;
Amendment 75 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Notes that, as a result of the above circumstances, the EU-India agricultural and food trade balance last year reached a deficit of EUR 1.8 billion;
Amendment 76 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Insists that any new trade agreement must be built in a way that respects the food security of both India and the European Union;
Amendment 77 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Calls on the Commission to resume negotiations on a balanced, ambitious and comprehensive free trade agreement with the aim to secure improved market access with a significant reduction in barriers to trade taking into account sensitive EU products along with ambitious commitments under trade and sustainable development chapter; Calls for the introduction of mirror measures that would ensure that imported products from India conform with EU internal market, health, environmental and animal welfare standards and that the same protection for consumers regardless of the origin of the products is ensured;
Amendment 78 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 d (new)
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9 d. Calls on the Commission to suspend India’s CXL quota for sugar and requests that the upcoming EU-India trade negotiations make sure that WTO- incompatible sugar subsidies are removed;
Amendment 79 #
2021/2177(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 e (new)
Paragraph 9 e (new)
9 e. Calls on the Commission to ensure that in the EU-India free trade agreement the protection of the EU quality schemes for agricultural products, foodstuffs, wine, spirit drinks and aromatised wines is being upheld.
Amendment 238 #
2021/2010(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the conclusions of the European Council of 21 July 20210, which task the Commission with putting forward proposals for additional own resources including a digital levy;
Amendment 93 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) The effectiveness and fairness of the global minimum tax reform heavily relies on its worldwide implementationswift and consistent implementation worldwide and by EU Member States by the end of 2023. It will thus be vital that all major trading partners of the Union apply either a qualified IIR or an equivalent set of rules on minimum taxation. In this context, and in support of legal certainty and efficiency of the global minimum tax rules, it is important to further delineate the conditions under which the rules implemented in a third country jurisdiction which will not transpose the rules of the global agreement can be granted equivalence to a qualified IIR. To this end, this Directive should provide for an assessment, by the Commission, of the equivalence criteria based on certain parameters together with a listing of third country jurisdictions that meet the equivalence criteria. This list would be modified, through a delegated act, following any subsequent assessment of the legal framework implemented by a third country jurisdiction in its domestic law. The implementation of the Pillar II Directive will require an increased exchange of information between Member States and third country jurisdictions. To this end, the Directive on administrative cooperation(DAC) should be reviewed in accordance with the future OECD work on a competent authority agreement to be developed by the end of 2022.
Amendment 204 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 44 – paragraph 2
Article 44 – paragraph 2
Amendment 253 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 1
Article 55 – paragraph 1
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 20223.
Amendment 258 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 3
Article 55 – paragraph 3
They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 20234.
Amendment 261 #
2021/0433(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 55 – paragraph 4
Article 55 – paragraph 4
However, they shall apply the provisions necessary to comply with Articles 11, 12 and 13 from 1 January 20245.
Amendment 51 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53 a (new)
Recital 53 a (new)
(53 a) In order to facilitate the access to factual, reliable and updated information on deforestation to operators, Member States authorities, and interested third countries authorities and relevant stakeholders, the Commission should establish a System for Deforestation Information Exchange (DIES) covering the forest areas worldwide, featuring a range of tools to enable all parties to quickly move towards No-Deforestation across supply chains. DIES (Deforestation Information Exchange System) should include thematic maps, a land cover map with time series since 2015, and a range of classes allowing to determine landscape composition. The DIES should also provide an alert system, relying upon a monthly monitoring of forest cover change, and a range of analyses and user-friendly and secured outputs, depicting how supply chains are linked to deforestation. In order to foster the use of the most accurate and timely information, to develop risk assessment and risk analyses, to improve checks on declarations and countries benchmarking, whilst developping a cooperative approach, the DIES should be made available to all relevant stakeholders. The DIES should use satellite imagery, including Copernicus Sentinel, which have the capability to provide the factual, reliable and updated information required, whilst ensuring the EU strategic autonomy in the provision of data.
Amendment 69 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
(1 a) ‘restored agriculture land’ means the conversion of forest to agricultural land, if the forest previously was agricultural land, such as old grazing land or former arable land;
Amendment 82 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
(a) that the relevant commodities and products, including those used for or contained in relevant products, were produced on land that has not been subject to deforestation after December ,31, 2020, and15, or were produced on restored agriculture land that have been restored after December 31, 2015
Amendment 90 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b
(b) that the wood has been harvested from the forest without inducing forest degradation after December ,31, 202015 ;
Amendment 94 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘produced’ means grown, harvested, raised, fed from birth to slaughter or import into or export from the EU, or obtained on relevant plot of land;
Amendment 131 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) geo-localisation coordinates, latitude and longitude of all plots of land where the relevant commodities and products were produced, as well as date or time range of production; in particular with regard to cattle, operators shall collect all the necessary information linking these geo-localisation coordinates to the actual identification and traceability information of the commodities and products concerned;
Amendment 135 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) adequate and verifiable information that the relevant commodities and products are deforestation-free; including information provided by the Platform foreseen under Art. 18bis;
Amendment 148 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) prevalence of deforestation or forest degradation in the country, region and area of production of the relevant commodity or product; taking into account the information provided by the DIES foreseen under Art. 18bis ;
Amendment 193 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18 a (new)
Article 18 a The Commission shall establish a using satellite imagery, including Copernicus Sentinel, covering the forest areas worldwide, and featuring tools to enable all parties to quickly move towards No- Deforestation across supply chains. The DIES shall provide: (a) thematic maps, including a land cover map with time series since 2015 and a range of classes allowing to appreciate landscape composition, (b) an alert system, relying upon a monthly monitoring of forest cover change, (c) A range of analyses and user-friendly and secured outputs, depicting how supply chains are linked to deforestation. The DIES shall be made available to Member State authorities, interested third countries authorities, operators and traders, in order to foster the use of the most accurate and timely information, and develop a cooperative approach with all interested parties.
Amendment 216 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) rate of deforestation and forest degradation, in particular having recourse to the information provided by the foreseen under Art. 18bis,
Amendment 248 #
2021/0366(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I
Goods as classified in the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation1. The Regulation shall not apply to goods if they are produced entirely from material that has completed its lifecycle and would otherwise have been discarded as waste, as defined in Article 3(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC2. This exemption does not apply to by-products of a manufacturing process, where that process involved material that was not waste as defined in Article 3 (1) of that Directive. Cattle ex 0102 Live cattle ex 0201 Meat of cattle, fresh or chilled ex 0202 Meat of cattle, frozen ex 0206 10 Edible offal of cattle, fresh or chilled ex 0206 22 Edible cattle livers, frozen ex 0206 29 Edible cattle offal (excluding tongues and livers), frozen ex 4101 Raw hides and skins of cattle (fresh, or salted, dried, limed, pickled or otherwise preserved, but not tanned, parchment-dressed or further prepared), whether or not dehaired or split ex 4104 Tanned or crust hides and skins of cattle, without hair on, whether or not split, but not further prepared ex 4107 Leather of cattle, further prepared after tanning or crusting, including parchment-dressed leather, without hair on, whether or not split Cocoa 1801 00 00 Cocoa beans, whole or broken, raw or roasted 1802 00 00 Cocoa shells, husks, skins and other cocoa waste 1803 Cocoa paste, whether or not defatted 1804 00 00 Cocoa butter, fat and oil 1805 00 00 Cocoa powder, not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter 1806 Chocolate and other food preparations containing cocoa Coffee 0901 Coffee, whether or not roasted or decaffeinated; coffee husks and skins; coffee substitutes containing coffee in any proportion . Oil palm 1511 Palm oil and its fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified 1207 10 Palm nuts and kernels 1513 21 Crude palm kernel and babassu oil and fractions thereof 1513 29 Palm kernel and babassu oil and their fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified (excluding Crude oil) 1516 20 96 – palm oil and derivates, including Palm Fatty Acid Distillate and palm oil mil effluent 2306 60 Oilcake and other solid residues of palm nuts or kernels, whether or not ground or in the form of pellets, resulting from the extraction of palm nuts oils or kernels oils Soya 1201 Soya beans, whether or not broken 1208 10 Soya bean flour and meal 1507 Soya-bean oil and its fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified 2304 Oilcake and other solid residues, whether or not ground or in the form of pellets, resulting from the extraction of soya-bean oil Wood 4401 Fuel wood, in logs, in billets, in twigs, in faggots or in similar forms; wood in chips or particles; sawdust and wood waste and scrap, whether or not agglomerated in logs, briquettes, pellets or similar forms 4403 Wood in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared 4406 Railway or tramway sleepers (cross-ties) of wood 4407 Wood sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed, of a thickness exceeding 6 mm 4408 Sheets for veneering (including those obtained by slicing laminated wood), for plywood or for other similar laminated wood and other wood, sawn lengthwise, sliced or peeled, whether or not planed, sanded, spliced or end-jointed, of a thickness not exceeding 6 mm 4409 Wood (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rebated, chamfered, V-jointed, beaded, moulded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges, ends or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed 4410 Particle board, oriented strand board (OSB) and similar board (for example, waferboard) of wood or other ligneous materials, whether or not agglomerated with resins or other organic binding substances 4411 Fibreboard of wood or other ligneous materials, whether or not bonded with resins or other organic substances 4412 Plywood, veneered panels and similar laminated wood 4413 00 00 Densified wood, in blocks, plates, strips or profile shapes 4414 00 Wooden frames for paintings, photographs, mirrors or similar objects 4415 Packing cases, boxes, crates, drums and similar packings, of wood; cable-drums of wood; pallets, box pallets and other load boards, of wood; pallet collars of wood (Not including packing material used exclusively as packing material to support, protect or carry another product placed on the market.) 4416 00 00 Casks, barrels, vats, tubs and other coopers’ products and parts thereof, of wood, including staves 4418 Builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood, including cellular wood panels, assembled flooring panels, shingles and shakes Pulp and paper of Chapters 47 and 48 of the Combined Nomenclature, with the exception of bamboo-based and recovered (waste and scrap) products 9403 30, 9403 40, 9403 50 00, 9403 60 and 9403 90 30 Wooden furniture 9406 10 00 Prefabricated buildings of wood _____________ 1 The nomenclature codes are taken from the Combined Nomenclature as defined in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff and as set out in Annex I thereto, which are valid at the time of publication of this Regulation and mutatis mutandis as amended by subsequent legislation. 2 Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3–30
Amendment 18 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 sets a binding Union target to reach a share of at least 32 % of energy from renewable sources in the Union's gross final consumption of energy by 2030. Under the Climate Target Plan, the share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption would need to increase to 405% by 2030 in order to achieve the Union’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction target10 . Therefore, the target set out in Article 3 of that Directive needs to be increased. __________________ 9 Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82–209 10 Point 3 of the Communication from the Commission COM(2020) 562 final of 17.9.2020, Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition Investing in a climate- neutral future for the benefit of our people
Amendment 26 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The role and contribution of carbon capture and storage to the renewable energy market should be fully realised and supported. Carbon in biomass has the potential to be converted into biochar through pyrolysis, which can then be stored by land application, thereby making it a negative emissions technology;
Amendment 31 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The rapid growth and increasing cost-competitiveness of renewable electricitnergy production can be used to satisfy a growing share of energy demand, for instance using heat pumps for space heating or low- temperature industrial processes, electric vehicles and biofuels for transport, or electric furnaces in certain industries. Renewable electricity can also be used to produce synthetic fuels for consumption in hard-to-decarbonise transport sectors such as aviation and maritime transport. A framework for electrification needs to enable robust and efficient coordination and expand market mechanisms to match both supply and demand in space and time, stimulate investments in flexibility, and help integrate large shares of variable renewable generation. Member States should therefore ensure that the deployment of renewable electricitynergy sources such as biofuels continues to increase at an adequate pace to meet growing demand. For this, Member States should establish a framework that includes market-compatiblebased mechanisms to tackle remaining barriers to have secure and adequate electricity and bioenergy systems fit for a high level of renewable energy, as well as storage facilities, fully integrated into the electricity system. In particular, this framework shall tackle remaining barriers, including non-financial ones such as insufficient digital and human resources of authorities to process a growing number of permitting applications.
Amendment 43 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) With more than 30 million electric vehicles expected in the Union by 2030 it is necessary where appropriate to ensure that they can fully contribute to the system integration of renewable electricity, and thus allow reaching higher shares of renewable electricity in a cost-optimal manner. The potential of electric vehicles to absorb renewable electricity at times when it is abundant and feed it back into a grid when there is scarcity has to be fully utilised. It is therefore appropriate to introduce specific measures on electric vehicles and information about renewable energy and how and when to access it which complement those in Directive (EU) 2014/94 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 and the [proposed Regulation concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020]. __________________ 16 Directive 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure (OJ L 307, 28.10.2014, p. 1)
Amendment 46 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Recharging points where electric vehicles typically park for extended periods of time, such as where people park for reasons of residence or employment, are highly relevant to energy system integration, therefore smart charging functionalities need to be ensured. Stresses too the importance of increasing the number of recharging points in rural and sparsely populated areas so that the increased use of electric vehicles in the agricultural sector is not hindered by the lack of infrastructure. In this regard, the operation of non-publicly accessible normal charging infrastructure is particularly important for the integration of electric vehicles in the electricity system as it is located where electric vehicles are parked repeatedly for long periods of time, such as in buildings with restricted access, employee parking or parking facilities rented out to natural or legal persons.
Amendment 49 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Renewable fuels of non-biological origin can be used for energy purposes, but also for non-energy purposes as feedstock or raw material in industries such as steel or chemicals. The use of renewable fuels of non-biological origin for both purposes exploits their full potential to replace fossil fuels used as feedstock and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in industry and should therefore be includacknowledged inas a target for the use of renewable fuels of non- biological origirenewable feedstock which can contribute towards the overall target for renewable energy as well as sustainable raw materials for industrial production. National measures to support the uptake of renewable fuels of non-biological origin in industry should not result in net pollution increases due to an increased demand for electricity generation that is satisfied by the most polluting fossil fuels, such as coal, diesel, lignite, oil peat and oil shale.
Amendment 59 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) The Union’s renewable energy policy aims to contribute to achieving the climate change mitigation objectives of the European Union in terms of the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. In the pursuit of this goal, it is essential to also contribute to wider environmental objectives, and in particular the prevention of biodiversity loss, which is negatively impacted by the indirect land use change associated to the production of certain biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels. Contributing to these climate and environmental objectives constitutes a deep and longstanding intergenerational concern for Union citizens and the Union legislator. As a consequence, the changes in the way the transport target is calculated should not affect the limits established on how to account toward that target certain fuels produced from food and feed crops on the one hand and high indirect land-use change-risk fuels on the other hand. In addition, in order not to create an incentive to use biofuels and biogas produced from food and feed crops in transport, Member States should continue to be able to choose whether count them or not towards the transport target. If they do not count them, they may reduce the greenhouse gas intensity reduction target accordingly, assuming that food and feed crop-based biofuels save 50% greenhouse gas emissions, which corresponds to the typical values set out in an annex to this Directive for the greenhouse gas emission savings of the most relevant production pathways of food and feed crop-based biofuels as well as the minimum savings threshold applying to most installations producing such biofuels.
Amendment 60 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) The Union’s renewable energy policy aims to contribute to achieving the climate change mitigation objectives of the European Union in terms of the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. In the pursuit of this goal, it is essential to also contribute to wider environmental objectives, and in particular the prevention of biodiversity loss, which is negatively impacted by the indirect land use change associated to the production of certain high in direct land- use change risks biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels. Contributing to these climate and environmental objectives constitutes a deep and longstanding intergenerational concern for Union citizens and the Union legislator. As a consequence, the changes in the way the transport target is calculated should not affect the limits established on how to account toward that target certain fuels produced from food and feed crops on the one hand and high indirect land-use change-risk fuels on the other hand. In addition, in order not to create an incentive to use biofuels and biogas produced from food and feed crops in transport, Member States should continue to be able to choose whether count them or not towards the transport target. If they do not count them, they may reduce the greenhouse gas intensity reduction target accordingly, assuming that food and feed crop-based biofuels save 50% greenhouse gas emissions, which corresponds to the typical values set out in an annex to this Directive for the greenhouse gas emission savings of the most relevant production pathways of food and feed crop-based biofuels as well as the minimum savings threshold applying to most installations producing such biofuelSustainable biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels that co-generate valuable protein for animal and human consumption, and are deforestation free, should be a building block of the decarbonisation of the transport, within reasonable limit preventing unwanted negative impacts on the availability of food and feed resources.
Amendment 79 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Directive (EU) 2018/2001 strengthened the bioenergy sustainability and greenhouse gas savings framework by setting criteria for all end-use sectors. It set out specific rules for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from forest biomass, requiring the sustainability of harvesting operations and the accounting of land-use change emissions. To achieve an enhanced protection of especially biodiverse and carbon-rich habitats, such as primary forests, highly biodiverse forests, grasslands and peat lands, existing exclusions and limitations to source forest biomass from those areas should be introduced, in line with the approach for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels produced from agricultural biomassfully implemented with specific measures in all member states in accordance with directive (EU) 2018/2001. In addition, the greenhouse gas emission saving criteria should also apply to existing biomass- based installations to ensure that bioenergy production in all such installations leads to greenhouse gas emission reductions compared to energy produced from fossil fuels.
Amendment 90 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a a (new)
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 42
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 42
(aa) point (42) is replaced by the following: ‘non-food cellulosic material’ means feedstock mainly composed of cellulose and hemicellulose, and having a lower lignin content than ligno-cellulosic material, including food and feed crop residues, such as straw, stover, husks and shells; grassy energy crops with a low starch content such as ryegrass, switchgrass, miscanthus, silphium, giant cane cover crops before and after main crops, leycrops; industrial residues, including from food and feed crops after vegetal oils, sugars, starches and protein have been extracted; wild flowering plants and material from biowaste, where wild flowering plant are understood to be perennial polycultures, consisting of at least 15 wild flower-rich plant species of annual, biannual and perennial nature;
Amendment 101 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall collectively ensure that the share of energy from renewable sources in the Union’s gross final consumption of energy in 2030 is at least 405%;
Amendment 102 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall take measures to ensure that energy from biomass is produced in a way that minimises undue distortive effects on the biomass raw material market and harmful impacts on biodiversity. To that end, they shall take into account the waste hierarchy as set out in Article 4 of Directive 2008/98/EC and the cascading principle referred to in the third subparagraph.
Amendment 108 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a – point i
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a – point i
Amendment 123 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 129 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
By 2026 the Commission shall present a report on the impact of the Member States’ support schemes for biomass, including on biodiversity and possible market distortions, and will assess the possibility for further limitations regarding support schemes to forest biomass.;.
Amendment 160 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a – paragraph 1
Article 22 a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall endeavour to increase the share of renewable sources in the amount of energy sources used for final energy and non-energy purposes in the industry sector by an indicative average minimum annual increase of 1.1 percentage points by 2030.
Amendment 161 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a (new)
Article 22 a (new)
Amendment 163 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shall ensure that the contribution of renewable fuels of non- biological origin used for final energy and non-energy purposes shall be 50 % of the hydrogen used for final energy and non- energy purposes in industry by 2030. For the calculation of that percentage, the following rules shall apply:
Amendment 165 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) For the calculation of the denominator, the energy content of hydrogen for final energy and non-energy purposes shall be taken into account, excluding hydrogen used as intermediate products for the production of conventional transport fuels.
Amendment 167 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 22 a – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 188 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the amount of renewable fuels and renewable electricity supplied to the transport sector leads to a greenhouse gas intensity reduction of at least 1320 % by 2030, compared to the baseline set out in Article 27(1), point (b), in accordance with an indicative trajectory set by the Member State;
Amendment 203 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point i
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
‘For the calculation of a Member State's gross final consumption of energy from renewable sources referred to in Article 7 and of the greenhouse gas intensity reduction target referred to in Article 25(1), first subparagraph, point (a), the share of biofuels and bioliquids, as well as of biomass fuels consumed in transport, where produced from food and feed crops, shall be no more than one percentage point higher than the share of such fuels in the final consumption of energy in the transport sector in 2020 in that Member State, with a maximum of 7 % of final consumption of energy in the transport sector in that Member State.;
Amendment 212 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii – introductory part
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
(ii) the second, third and fourth subparagraph is replaced by the followingare deleted:
Amendment 215 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a – point ii
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Amendment 324 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex V – part C – point 6
Annex V – part C – point 6
6. For the purposes of the calculation referred to in point 1(a), greenhouse gas emissions savings from improved agriculture management, esca, such as shifting to reduced or zero-tillage, storing carbon in soil with biochar, improved crop/rotation, the use of cover crops, including crop residue management, and the use of organic soil improver (e.g. compost, manure fermentation digestate), shall be taken into account only if they do not risk to negatively affect biodiversity. Carbon in biomasses can be converted into biochar through pyrolysis, which can be stored by land application, thereby making it a negative emissions technology. Here, the bonus for the improved agricultural and manure management is returned to the farmer responsible for the negative emissions when sustainability/environmental certificates are issued. Further, solid and verifiable evidence shall be provided that the soil carbon has increased or that it is reasonable to expect to have increased over the period in which the raw materials concerned were cultivated while taking into account the emissions where such practices lead to increased fertiliser and herbicide use37 .; __________________ 37 Measurements of soil carbon can constitute such evidence, e.g. by a first measurement in advance of the cultivation and subsequent ones at regular intervals several years apart. In such a case, before the second measurement is available, increase in soil carbon would be estimated on the basis of representative experiments or soil models. From the second measurement onwards, the measurements would constitute the basis for determining the existence of an increase in soil carbon and its magnitude.
Amendment 345 #
2021/0218(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)Directive (EU) 2018/2001
Annex IX – part A
(a a) In part A, the following point (r) in inserted: (r) Intermediate and cover crops.
Amendment 426 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) Contracting Parties to the Treaty establishing the Energy Community45 or Parties to Association Agreements including Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas are committed to decarbonisation processes that should eventually result in the adoption of carbon pricing mechanisms similar or equivalent to the EU ETS or in their participation in the EU ETS. to the EU ETS should benefit from CBAM exemption with regard to the goods originating in those countries provided that certain conditions are satisfied. Those third countries should develop a roadmap and commit to implement an effective system of monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions, a carbon pricing mechanism similar to the EU ETS, and should commit to achieving carbon neutrality. That exemption should be withdrawn if there are reasons to believe that the country in question does not fulfil its commitments. The Union is committed to providing those third countries with financial support for the adoption of carbon pricing mechanisms similar to the EU ETS, the deployment of decarbonisation technologies, and the implementation of other measures aimed at achieving climate neutrality. __________________ 45 Council Decision 2006/500/EC of 29 May 2006 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty (OJ L 198, 20.7.2006, p. 15).
Amendment 622 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point a (new)
(a) the third country is a party to the Treaty establishing the Energy Community and/or a party to Association Agreement, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area with the Union;
Amendment 623 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point b (new)
(b) the third country has put in place an effective system of monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 624 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point c (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point c (new)
(c) the third country has submitted a roadmap to the Commission, containing a timetable for the adoption of measures to implement the conditions set out in points (d), (e), and (f);
Amendment 626 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11– point e (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 11– point e (new)
(e) the third country has committed to climate neutrality and has accordingly formally formulated and communicated, where applicable, to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change a long-term low greenhouse gas emissions development strategy aligned with that objective, and has implemented that obligation in its domestic legislation;
Amendment 627 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point f (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 11 – point f (new)
(f) the third country has, when implementing the roadmap pursuant to point (c), demonstrated substantial progress towards the alignment of domestic law with Union law in the field of climate action on the basis of that roadmap. The implementation of an emission trading system by 1 January 2030 is conditional upon third country’s receipt of the financial, institutional, and expert support from the Union.
Amendment 628 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12
Article 2 – paragraph 12
12. The Union, may conclude agreements with third countries with a view to take account of carbon pricing mechanisms in these countries in the application of Article 9A third country satisfying the conditions set out in paragraph 11, points (a) to (f), shall be listed in Annex II, Section C, of this Regulation, and shall submit two reports on the fulfilment of the conditions pursuant to paragraph 7, points (a) to (f), one before 1 July 2025 and another before 1 July 2029. By 31 December 2025 and by 31 December 2029, the Commission shall assess, notably on the basis of the roadmap pursuant to paragraph 11, point (c), and the reports received from the third country, whether that third country continues to respect the conditions set out in paragraph 11.
Amendment 633 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. A third country listed in Annex II, Section C of this Regulation, shall be removed from that list if the Commission has reasons to consider that the country has not shown sufficient progress to comply with one of the requirements listed in paragraph 11, points (a) to (f), or if the country has taken action incompatible with the objectives set out in the Union climate and environmental legislation.
Amendment 634 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to amend the lists in Annex II, Sections A, B or C, depending on whether the conditions in paragraphs 5, 7, 9, 11 or 13 are satisfied.
Amendment 635 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12 c (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. The Union may conclude agreements with third countries with a view to take account of carbon pricing mechanisms in these countries.
Amendment 1093 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 2(10), 2(114), 18(3) and 27(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time.
Amendment 1098 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 2(10), 2(114), 18(3) and 27(5) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Amendment 1103 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 7
Article 28 – paragraph 7
7. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 2(10), 2(114), 18(3) and 27(5) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Amendment 1259 #
2021/0214(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 a (new)
Annex II – Part 2 a (new)
Section C - Countries outside the scope of this Regulation who are committed to decarbonisation processes that should result in the adoption of emission trading system similar to the EU ETS [Currently empty]
Amendment 127 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
Recital 17 a (new)
(17 a) Energy taxation should only apply to final consumption, and neither energy use within the energy value chain nor any form of conversion or storage should be taxed. That principle should apply to all forms of energy-conversion processes and to energy products and electricity used for the transport and storage of energy products and electricity. In that context, conversion should be understood as the process of converting one form of energy into another, such as using natural gas to generate electricity or producing hydrogen from electricity or natural gas.
Amendment 131 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The need to pursue the objectives of the Directive requires that no distinction is made between commercial andMember States may need to differentiate between commercial and non- commercial diesel. Member States should have the option to use that possibility to reduce the gap between the taxation of non-commercial diegas oil useld as well aspropellant and petrol. It should be possible to treat business use and non-business use for heating fuels and electricity. of energy products and electricity differently for tax purposes.
Amendment 146 #
2021/0213(CNS)
(22) In order to ensure a smooth implementation of this Directive, the minimum levels of taxation for motor fuels used for intra-EU non-business and non- pleasure flights would be reached over a transitional period of ten years, whereas sustainable alternative fuels and electricity would be subject to a zero minimum rate for ten years. Energy products and electricity used for intra-EU business aviation and pleasure flights should be subject to the standard levels of taxation applicable to motor fuels and electricity in the Member States.
Amendment 171 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) In particular, highly efficient combined heat and power generation and, in order to promote the use of alternative energy sources, renewable forms of energy may qualify for preferential treatment. It is desirable to establish a Union framework to allow Member States to exempt or reduce excise duties so as to promote biofuels, thereby contributing to the better functioning of the internal market and affording Member States and economic operators a sufficient degree of legal certainty. Distortions of competition should be limited and the incentive of a reduction in the basic costs for producers and distributors of biofuels should be maintained through, inter alia, the adjustments by Member States taking into account changes in raw material prices.
Amendment 173 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Targeted exemptions or reductions in the tax level may prove necessary to incentivise the achievement of environmental protection objectives and, the improvements in energy efficiency and the international competitiveness of the Union productive sector.
Amendment 179 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) TargetedCertain exemptions or reductions in the tax level may prove necessary to tackle the social imp; notably because of the lactk of energy taxes. An exemption from taxation may temporarily prove necessary to protect vulnerable householda stronger harmonisation at the Union level, because of the risks of a loss of international competitiveness or because of social or environmental considerations.
Amendment 181 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Targeted reductions in the tax level may prove necessary to tackle the social or sectoral impact of energy taxes. An exemption from taxation may temporarily prove necessary to protect vulnerable households or strategic sectors. The agricultural sector, and particularly food production, merit specific treatment as the value of energy products used in agriculture, forestry and horticulture represents a significant share of agricultural costs.
Amendment 183 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28 a (new)
Recital 28 a (new)
(28 a) The implementation of this Directive could have socio-economic consequences as well as a diverse impact on income classes and Member States. In this regard, a Social Monitor should be established by this Directive to assess the implementation of the Directive and its impact in the different Member States, regions and income classes. The Social Monitor would assign reporting obligations to both the Commission and Member States. The Commission should provide a holistic overview regarding the evolution of energy prices as well as technological and market maturity of alternative energy carriers. Member States should describe the social measures taken to ease the potential socio-economic consequences of the implementation of this Directive. Member States might as well put a special emphasis on the state of technological and market maturity of alternative energy carriers through complementary assessment, and the Commission should take into account assessments by Member States that demonstrate that cleaner alternatives are not readily available on the market and are not expected to be available in the short term. According to the assessments of the Social Monitor, if no significant progress is made to mitigate socio- economic impacts on lower and middle income households, Member States could prolong the transition period for households recognised as lower and middle income ones by Member States.
Amendment 199 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Every five years and for the first time five years after the entry into force of this Directive, the Commission should report to the Council and to the European Parliament on the application of this Directive, examining in particular the minimum levels of taxation, the impact of innovation and technological developments, especially as regards energy efficiency, the use of electricity in transport and the justification for the exemptions, reductions and differentiations laid down in this Directive. The report should take into account the proper functioning of the internal market, environmental and social considerations, the real value of the minimum levels of taxation and the wider relevant objectives of the Treaties.
Amendment 203 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point o
Amendment 209 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
For the purposes of this Directive, sustainable biofuel is a liquid fuel produced from other feedstocks than those listed in Annex IX, Part A, to Directive 2018/2001, and complying with the sustainability and greenhouse gas emission-saving criteria of this Directive, as appropriate. For the purposes of this Directive, sustainable biogas is a gaseous fuel produced from other feedstocks than those listed in Annex IX, Part A, to Directive 2018/2001, and complying with the sustainability and GHG emission- saving criteria of this Directive, as appropriate.
Amendment 212 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 5 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 5 – point b
b) ‘low-carbon fuels’ shall mean low- carbon hydrogenfossil-based hydrogen with carbon capture and synthetic gaseous and liquid fuels the energy content of which is derived from fossil-based hydrogen with carbon capture low-carbon hydrogen, as well as any fossil-based fuels, which meet the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which a specific economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation according to Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council436 and Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) […]/[…]37 44. ‘Recycled Carbon Fuels’, as defined by Article 2(35) of Directive (EU) 2018/2001, shall be included in this category. _________________ 36 Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13) 37 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) […]/[...] supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives, C/2021/2800 final (OJ […], p.[…]).
Amendment 215 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 – paragraph 1
An energy product has a dual use when it is used both as heating fuel and for purposes other than as motor fuel and heating fuel. The use of energy products for chemical reduction and in electrolytic, mineralogical and metallurgical processes, including various hydrogen production methods, such as methane pyrolysis or carbon capture, storage and utilisation, when energy products are used directly in or to provide a direct energy input to the process, or their consumption is connected to the process, shall be regarded as dual use,
Amendment 219 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3
— electricity used principally for the purposes of chemical reduction and in electrolytic, mineralogical and metallurgical processes, when electricity is used directly in or to provide a direct energy input to the process, or its consumption is connected to the process,
Amendment 226 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that where equalProvided that they respect the minimum levels of taxation apre laid down in Annex I in relation to a given use, equal levels of taxation are fixed for products put to that use. Member States shall also replicate at any time the ranking of minimum levels of taxation as laid down in Annex I in relation to difscribed by this Directive and that they are compatible with Community law, differentiated rates of taxation may be applied by Member States, under fiscal control, in the following cases: – between business and non-business use, for energy products and electricity referrent products for each given used to in Articles 9 and 10.
Amendment 233 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. TWhe minimum levels of taxation laid down in this Directive shall be adapted every year starting from 1 January 2024 to take account of the changes in the harmonised index of consumer prices excluding energy and unprocessed food as published by Eurostat. The minimum levels shall be adapted automatically, by increasing or decreasing the base amount in euro by the percentage change in thare a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Annex I, the Commission shall assess the need to prolong the transitional period. The Commission shall therefore keep the minimum levels of taxation as laid down in this Directive under review in line with Article 31.In its assessment the Commission shall give particular consideration to the technological and market maturity of alternative energy carriers, as well as taking into account assessments from Member States that demonstrate that cleaner alternatives are not readily available on the market iandex over the pr are not expecteding calendar year to be available in the short term.
Amendment 234 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The minimum levels of taxation laid down in this Directive shall be adapted every year starting from 1 January 2024 to take account of the changes shall be adapted , on the basis of transparent and holistic assessment taking the harmonised index of consumer prices excluding energy and unprocessed food as published by Eurostat. The minimum levels shall be adapted automaticallyrisk of loss of international competitiveness fully into account, by increasing or decreasing the base amount in euro by the percentage change in that index over the preceding calendar year.
Amendment 239 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table A of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply. until 1 January 2033.
Amendment 245 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table B of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply until 1 January 2033permanently.
Amendment 250 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Without prejudice to Article 5(2), when a transitional period is applicable as provided for in Table C of Annex I, the increase in the minimum levels of taxation shall be fixed at one tenth per year until 1 January 2033. For low-carbon fuels, the minimum level of taxation set for the first year of the transitional period shall apply until 1 January 2033permanently.
Amendment 256 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Without prejudice to other Union provisions, Member States may apply under fiscal control exemptions or reductions in the level of taxation to energy products and electricity used for high-efficiency cogeneration.´
Amendment 265 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The minimum levels of taxation referred to in the first subparagraph shall start from zero and increase each year by one tenth of the final minimum rates, set out in Tables A and D of Annex I, over a transitional period of ten years. A minimum rate of zero shall apply to sustainable biofuels and biogas, low-carbon fuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin, advanced sustainable biofuels and biogas, and electricity over that transitional period of ten years.
Amendment 274 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Energy products supplied for use as fuel to aircrafts and electricity used directly for charging electric aircrafts, for the purposes of intra-EU air navigation of cargo-only flights shall be exempted for all cases when they are covered by existing aviation ETS.
Amendment 289 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 296 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. Member States mayshall apply under fiscal control total or partial exemptions to electricity directly supplied to vessels berthed in ports.
Amendment 298 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The revenues related to inland waterway transport shall be used to set up a dedicated EU inland waterway fund. The eligible projects and investments shall focus on ship retrofitting and renewal in order to improve the energy efficiency of ships and support investments in innovative and energy-saving technologies as well as port infrastructure, such as the deployment of alternative fuels, supporting the decarbonisation of the sector.
Amendment 314 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 5 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 5 a (new)
- generated from renewable gases and renewable fuels of non-biological origin;
Amendment 316 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States may also exempt energy products and electricity used for high- efficiency cogeneration.
Amendment 321 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) renewable fuels of non-biological origin, advancedlow-carbon fuels, sustainable biofuels, bioliquids, biogas and advanced- sustainable products falling within CN codes 4401 and 4402;
Amendment 322 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) renewable fuels of non-biological origin, advanced sustainable biofuels, bioliquids, biogas and advanced -sustainable products falling within CN codes 4401 and 4402;
Amendment 325 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) energy products and electricity used for agricultural, horticultural or aqua cultural works and forestry.
Amendment 326 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(e b) energy products supplied for use as fuel for commercial fishing activity and electricity produced on board a fishing vessel.
Amendment 327 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
(e c) renewable hydrogen
Amendment 340 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c – introductory part
(c) reductions in the level of taxation, which shall not go below the minima as set out in Table C and D of Annex I, to energy products used as heating fuel and electricity if used by households and/or by organisations recognised as charitable by the Member State concerned. In the case of such charitable organisations, Member States shall confine the reduction to use for the purpose of non-business activities. Where mixed use takes place, taxation shall apply in proportion to each type of use. If a use is insignificant, it may be treated as nil. For the purposes of point (c), the minimum levels of taxation as set out in Tables C and D of Annex I shall start from zero and increase over a transitional period of ten years by one tenth of the final minimum rates in each year. For the purposes of point (c), energy products and electricity used by households recognised as lower-and middle-income by Member States shall be exempt for a maximum period of ten years after the entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 366 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a Reporting obligations of the Commission - Social monitor By … [two years after the date of entry into force of this Directive] and every two years thereafter, the Commission shall adopt and make publicly available a report providing detailed assessments of the situation of energy prices in Member States and on the EU market and of the effects of this Directive thereon. That Report shall include all relevant facts and figures covering energy prices developments, as well as an assessment of the effects of the implementation of this Directive on those prices, with special emphasis on households living in the condition of energy poverty as defined in this Directive. The Commission shall in this respect take into consideration the different starting positions of Member States and assess possible extensions of the transitional period and exemptions. This shall specifically apply to justified cases related to households living in the condition of energy poverty to prevent inadequate price jumps that may occur after the end of the transitional period. The Commission in cooperation with Member States shall use the criteria set out in this Directive to identify and report on the number of households that are living in energy poverty.
Amendment 381 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Every five years and for the first time five years after 1 January 2023, the Commission shall submit to the Council and to the European Parliament a report on the application of this Directive.
Amendment 390 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table A – rows 10 and 11
Annex I – table A – rows 10 and 11
Amendment 393 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table A – row 16 a (new)
Annex I – table A – row 16 a (new)
Amendment 396 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table B – rows 10 and 11
Annex I – table B – rows 10 and 11
Amendment 399 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table B – row 16 a (new)
Annex I – table B – row 16 a (new)
Amendment 403 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table C – rows 12 and 13
Annex I – table C – rows 12 and 13
Amendment 408 #
2021/0213(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table C – row 19 a (new)
Annex I – table C – row 19 a (new)
Amendment 31 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 , the Union has enshrined the target of economy-wide climate neutrality by 2050 in legislation. That Regulation also establishes a binding Union commitment to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions (emissions after deduction of removals) by at least 55 % below 1990 levels by 2030. All sectors of the economy are expected to contribute to achieving that target, including the land use, land use change and forestry sectorwith the highest priority being the reduction of fossil emissions. The contribution of net removals to the 2030 Union climate target is limited to 225 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent. In the context of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, the Commission reaffirmed in a corresponding statement its intention to propose a revision of Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council31 , in line with the ambition to increase net carbon removals to levels above 300 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent in the land use, land use change and forestry sector by 2030. This Regulation must remain as a climate accounting framework for carbon emissions and removals in accordance with the IPCC reporting guidelines. To ensure better regulation and avoiding excessive burden and regulatory overlap, LULUCF should not be extended to encompass other policy areas such as measures in agriculture and forestry, _________________ 30 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1).’. 31 Regulation (EU) 2018/841 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry in the 2030 climate and energy framework, and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 and Decision No 529/2013/EU (OJ L 156, 19.6.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 41 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to contribute to the increased ambition to reduce greenhouse gas net emissions from at least 40 % to at least 55 % below 1990 levels, binding annual targets for net greenhouse gas removals should be set out for each Member State in the land use, land use change and forestry sector in the period from 2026 to 2030 (in analogy to the annual emission allocations set out in Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council32 ), resulting in a target of 310 millions of tonnes CO2 equivalent of net removals for the Union as a whole in 2030 and should take into account the principles of sustainable forest management as agreed by Forest Europe and FAO. The methodology used to establish the national targets for 2030 should take into account the average greenhouse gas emissions and removals from the years 2016, 2017 and 2018, reported by each Member State, and reflect the current mitigation performance of the land use, land use change and forestry sector, and each Member State’s share of the managed land area in the Union, taking into account the capacity of that Member State to improve its performance in the sector via land management practices or changes in land use that benefit the climate and biodiversity. _________________ 32 Regulation (EU) 2018/842 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 contributing to climate action to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement and amending Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 (OJ L 156, 19.6.2018, p. 26).
Amendment 65 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The land sector has the potential to become rapidlymake a shift towards climate-neutral by 2035 in a cost-effective manner, and subsequently generate more greenhouse gas removals than emissions. A collective commitmentCombining greenhouse gas removals and emissions from LULUCF and agricultural emissions under ESR to a single accounting system in accordance with the IPCC reporting guidelines would simplify the climate accounting and make it more efficient. Commitment at Member State level aiming to achieve climate-neutrality in the land sector in 2035 at EU level can provide the needed planning certainty to drive land- based mitigation action in the short term, considering that it can take many years for such action to deliver the desired mitigation outcomes. Moreover, the land sector is projected to become the largest sector in the EU greenhouse gas flux profile in 2050. It is therefore particularly important to anchor that sector to a trajectory that can effectively deliver net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. By mid-2024, the Member States should submit their updated integrated national energy and climate plans in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council34 . The plans should include relevant measures by which each Member State best contributes to the collective target of climate neutrality in the land sector at EU level in 2035. On the basis of these plans, the Commission should propose national targets, ensuring that the Union-wideeach Member State´s greenhouse gas emissions and removals in the land use, land use change and forestry sector and the emissions from the agriculture non-CO2 sectors tare at least balanced by 2035. Contrary to the EU level target of climate neutrality for the land sector by 2035, such national targets will be binding and enforceable on each Member Stateget carbon neutrality by 2035. _________________ 34 Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p.1).
Amendment 75 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) In order to enhance greenhouse gas removals, individual farmers or forest managers and owners need a direct incentive to store more carbon on their land and their forests while encouraging to implement sustainable forest management practices. Union should base the LULUCF accounting in line with Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and outcomes of the Glasgow Summit to avoid double counting and enhance the development of robust and harmonized global accounting of carbon removals. New business models based on carbon farming incentives and on the certification of carbon removals need to be increasingly deployed in the period until 2030. Carbon removals should be based on solid financial framework, accounting rules and market based design from public and private resources, whereas CAP-funding must mainly remain targeted for food production and ensuring food security in the Union. Such incentives and business models will enhance climate mitigation in the bio- economy, including through the use of durable harvested wood products and through substitution of fossil-based raw materials, in full respect of ecological principles fostering biodiversity and the circular economy. Hence, new categories of all carbon storage products should be introduced in addition to the harvested wood products all bio-based products, while ensuring new innovative solutions, taking into account the potential of side streams and residues as well as carbon capture and storage technologies. The emerging business models, farming and land management practices to enhance removals contribute to a balanced territorial development and economic growth in rural areas. They also create opportunities for new jobs and provide incentives for relevant training, reskilling and upskilling.
Amendment 83 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In order to provide the necessary financial support for farmers in the Union, Member States, when drafting their respective national Strategic Plans in line with the legal framework for the common agriculture policy (CAP) for the years 2023-2027 within which the support for Strategic Plans is to be drawn up by Member States and financed by the EAGF and by the EAFRD, should set out their specific objectives and concrete actions to ensure the achievement of climate change adaptation and mitigation. This means creating a clear link between LULUCF objectives and substantial financial objectives from the CAP in tailor-made solutions for the farmers in each Member State to select their best possible approach: within eco-schemes and rural development agri- environmental measures or investments, the European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability (EIP-AGRI), as well as support for farm advisory services. To develop and sustain financial incentives in sufficient quantity and in the long- term, additional budgetary lines need to be unlocked through financial instruments and public funds, such as the LIFE Programme and Horizon Europe.
Amendment 85 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In line with the Union objective of net zero land take by 2050, conversion of natural and agricultural land into built- up areas should be avoided. Therefore, Member States should introduce measures in their land-use plans orientated to compensate for any reduction of land resulting from urbanisation.
Amendment 86 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) There are evident benefits of sustainable forest management in increasing the carbon sink targets by enhancing carbon sinks, preventing natural disturbances and increasing biodiversity.
Amendment 87 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 b (new)
Recital 10 b (new)
(10b) It is necessary to underline that there is potential of sustainably sourced growing media constituents for seedlings in carbon sequestration.
Amendment 90 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Considering the specificities of the land use, land use change and forestry sector in each Member State caused by fluctuations in the nature, economy and society, as well as the fact that Member States need to increase their performance to achieve their national binding targets, a maximum range of flexibilities within LULUCF-sector and between LULUCF and ESR should remain at the disposal of the Member States, including trading surpluses and the extension of forest- specific flexibilities, while respecting the environmental integrity of the targets.
Amendment 103 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Due to the change to reporting- based targets, the greenhouse gas emissions and removals need to be estimated with a higher level of accuracy. Moreover, the updated EU Bioeconomy Strategy, the Communication from the Commission on EU Biodiversity Strategy for 203038 , the Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system39 , the EU Forest Strategy40 , the revised Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council41 and the Communication from the Commission on Forging a climate-resilient Europe - the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change42 will all require enhanced monitoring of land, thereby helping to protect and enhance the resilience of nature-based carbon removals throughout the Union. The monitoring and reporting of emissions and removals needs to be upgraded, using advanced technologies available under Union programmes, such as Copernicus, and digital data collected under the Common Agricultural Policy, applying the twin transition of green and digital innovation. _________________ 38 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 - Bringing nature back into our lives (COM(2020) 380 final). 39 COM/2020/381 final. 40 […] 41 Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 82). 42 COM/2021/82 final.
Amendment 123 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)
(ga) carbon storage;
Amendment 134 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The 2030 Union target for net greenhouse gas removals is 310 million tonnes CO2 equivalent as a sum of the Member States targets established in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article, and shall be based on the average of its greenhouse gas inventory data for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018. The conditions on measures for achieving those targets in land use and forestry sectors should be set in other related legislation at both Union and national level. This legislation sets the overall ambition and accounting rules.
Amendment 141 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Each Member State shall ensure that, taking into account the flexibilities provided for in Articles 12 and 13 and 13b, the annual sum of its greenhouse gas emissions and removals on its territory and in all of the land reporting categories referred to in Article 2(2), points (a) to (j), in each year in the period from 2026 to 2030 does not exceed the limit established by a linear trajectory, ending in 2030 on the target set out for that Member State in Annex IIa. The linear trajectory of a Member State shall start in 2022.
Amendment 147 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Regulation (EU) 2018/841
3. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts setting out the annual targets based on the linear trajectory for net greenhouse gas removals for each Member State, for each year in the period from 2026 to 2029 in terms of tonnes CO2 equivalent. These national trajectories shall be based on the average greenhouse gas inventory data for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023, reported by each Member State. The value of the 310 million tonnes CO2 equivalent net removals as a sum of the targets for Member States set out in Annex IIa may be subject to a technical correction due to a change of methodology by Member States. The method for determination of the technical correction to be added to the targets of the Member States, shall be set out in these implementing acts. For the purpose of those implementing acts, the Commission shall carry out a comprehensive review of the most recent national inventory data for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023 submitted by Member States pursuant to Article 26(4) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999.
Amendment 163 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall, by 31 December 2025 and on the basis of integrated national energy and climate plans submitted by each Member State pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 by 30 June 2024, make proposals for the contribution of each Member State to the net emissions reduction: (a) conduct an impact assessment of the net zero greenhouse gas emissions target for 2035 in light of the objectives laid down in Article 39 TFEU, the Union bioeconomy and the substitution of fossil fuels; (b) based on the impact assessment referred to in point (a) of this subparagraph, make recommendations for Member States to design policies which equally incentivise emission removals and reductions and ensure balance between all sectors set out in Article 2(3), points (a) to (i), in order to achieve the indicative target of net zero in 2035, while ensuring a fair distribution among Member States; (c) introduce a fair, market-based and voluntary compensation mechanism for a carbon certification trading system, which promotes high-quality carbon certificates that can ensure the achievement of the criteria of additionality, permanence, no double counting and authenticity to incentivise improved land management practices, resulting in enhanced carbon capture; (d) consider decreasing sink services that arise in connection with land use changes in the area of the expansion of settlement and transportation areas separately and make sure that they are not accounted for at the expense of the sectors set out in Article 2(3), points (a) to (i); (e) propose, in line with the objective of net zero land take by 2050 and the EU Soil Strategy, measures to protect land from soil sealing, urbanisation and urbans sprawl as a key lever in the preservation of carbon sinks and the sustaining of long-term carbon removal practices in territories.
Amendment 176 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Regulation 2018/841
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts by ... 3 months after the entry into force of this Regulation in accordance with Article 16 in order to amend paragraph 1 of this Article and Annex V by adding new categories of carbon storage products, including harvested wood products, and all relevant bio-based products that have a carbon sequestration effect, based on IPCC Guidelines as adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC or the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, and ensuring environmental integrity. The Commission shall take into account the life cycle analysis, the substitution effect, the potential of side streams and residues and the inclusion of bioenergy carbon capture, storage and utilization technologies in carbon storage products.;
Amendment 186 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 3
(a) paragraph 3 is deletedreplaced by the following: “3. To the extent that total removals exceed total emissions in a Member State in the period from 2021 to 2025, and after subtraction of any quantity taken into account under Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2018/842 or transferred to another Member State pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article, that Member State may bank the remaining quantity of removals to the period from 2026 to 2030.”;
Amendment 217 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 13c – paragraph 1
Article 13c – paragraph 1
Amendment 220 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 13c – paragraph 2
Article 13c – paragraph 2
Amendment 234 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Following the report, the Commission shall make legislative proposals where it deems it appropriate. In particular, the proposals shall set out annual targets and governance aiming towards the 2035 Member State climate-neutrality target as laid down in Article 4(4), additional Union policies and measures, and a post-2035 framework, including in the scope of the Regulation greenhouse gas emissions and removals from additional sectors, such as the marine and freshwater environment.;
Amendment 239 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Article 4 –paragraph 1 – point a – point 1 – point ii
Article 4 –paragraph 1 – point a – point 1 – point ii
the Member State’s commitments and national targets for net greenhouse gas removals pursuant to Article 4(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2018/841 and its contributions aim towards reaching the UnionMember State´s objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2035 and achieving negative emissions thereafter pursuant to Article 4(4) of that Regulation;;
Amendment 251 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III
Annex III
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Geographically explicit land-use conversion data in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national GHG inventories. TheMember States are encouraged to develop greenhouse gas inventory shall operate on the basis of electronic databases and geographic information systems, and comprise:
Amendment 254 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III
Annex III
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 1
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 1
Amendment 255 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III
Annex III
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) areas subject to compensation for natural disturbances under paragraph 5 of Article 13b of Regulation (EU) 2018/841
Amendment 256 #
2021/0201(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III
Annex III
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 4
Annex V – Part 3 – paragraph 4
Member States shall aim at from 2026 for all carbon pool emission and removal estimates falling in areas of high carbon stock land use units referred to in point (c) above, areas of land use units under protection or under restoration referred to in points (d) and (e) above, and areas of land use units under high future climate risks referred to in point (f) above, apply Tier 3 methodology, in accordance with the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national GHG inventories.’.
Amendment 114 #
2021/0200(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b – point ii
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(ii) point (a) is replaced by the following: (a) the cumulative quantity taken into account for that Member State for the years 2021 to 2025 does not exceed halfthe 95% of the maximum amount of total net removals set out in Annex III to this Regulation for that Member State;
Amendment 116 #
2021/0200(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b – point ii
Regulation (EU) 2018/842
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) the cumulative quantity taken into account for that Member State for the years 2026 to 2030 does not exceed halfthe 95% of the maximum amount of total net removals set out in Annex III to this Regulation for that Member State;.
Amendment 23 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the new reform of the common agricultural policy already aims to improve the environmental commitments of farmers and underlines the important positive impact of rotation in the protection of biodiversity;
Amendment 25 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the importance of genetic diversity, of species and of natural landscapes, and considers that agriculture makes it possible to preserve the biodiversity of many regions, such as open mountain areas, by avoiding the proliferation of invasive plant and animal species;
Amendment 27 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Requires strong support to agricultural practices, such as agroforestry and pastoralism in high value areas, which provide a wide variety of ecosystem services, including biodiversity, landscape, carbon storage, soil protection, and water cycle regulation;
Amendment 41 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the high level of ambition of the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030 in seeking to halt and reverse biodiversity loss in the EU; considers that this level of ambition encourages policy action at all levels and promotes the development of research and innovative solutions to tackle biodiversity loss; stresses that the continuous decline in farmland biodiversity is a reality and that bold action is needed to counteract this trend, carefully balancing voluntary and legislative measures;
Amendment 47 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the high level of ambition of the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030 in seeking to halt and reverse biodiversity loss in the EU; considers that this level of ambition encourages policy action at all levels and promotes the development of research and innovative solutions to tackle biodiversity loss; stresses that the continuous decline in farmland biodiversity is a reality and that bold action by society as a whole is needed to counteract this trend;
Amendment 80 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises the strong link with the Farm to Fork strategy and the need for a holistic approach to the food system; calls on the Commission to base all measures and targets included in subsequent proposals on impact assessments ex-ante and to establish an evidence-based evaluation of the implementation of the strategy’se measures and targets ex-post, in particular of the individual and cumulative impacts on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture in the EU, food security and prices, and the potential risks of displacing biodiversity losses abroad by the replacement of local agricultural production with imports;
Amendment 120 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Invites the Commission to consider the need and the possibility for re- evaluating existing protected zones, which could include, inter alia, assessment of their effectiveness; Believes that there should be a possibility for consultation with the Commission for the change of the status of these zones if the evaluation proves it necessary;
Amendment 125 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers that the creation of sub- zones or regions, in the existing protected zones, where different range of activities could be permitted, based on the specificities of these areas, would allow for more flexibility while at the same time increase the effectiveness of the protection;
Amendment 147 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates the importance of sustainable utilization and management of water resources for the protection and the restauration of the biodiversity; encourages the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their support for effective and efficient irrigation systems and sustainable water management;
Amendment 160 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights the importance of maintaining and restoring high-diversity landscape features in agricultural landscapes for their value in terms of biodiversity, pollinators and the natural biological control of pests; calls on the Member States to develop the necessary measures under their CAP Strategic Plans to promote non-productive areas and features with the aim of achieving an area of at least 10% of high diversity areas beneficial for biodiversity at national level, promoting interconnectivity between habitats and thereby maximising the potential for biodiversity; recognises that agriculture and forestry practices do not contradict the conservation objectives of high diversity areas per se and hence productive use must remain an option; stresses that specific local conditions must be taken into account with regard to admissible forms of productive use;
Amendment 167 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights the importance of maintaining and restoring high-diversity landscape features in agricultural landscapes for their value in terms of biodiversity, pollinators and the natural biological control of pests; calls on the Member States to develop the necessary measures under their CAP Strategic Plans to promote non-productive areas and features with the aim of achieving an area of at least 10% of high diversity areas beneficial for biodiversity at national level, promoting interconnectivity between habitats and thereby maximising the potential for biodiversity; considers that the setting up of non-productive areas should be assessed to avoid as much as possible a negative impact on the access of young farmers to land;
Amendment 170 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights the importance of maintaining and restoring high-diversity landscape features in agricultural landscapes for their value in terms of biodiversity, pollinators and the natural biological control of pests; calls on the Member States to develop the necessary measures under their CAP Strategic Plans to promote non-productive areas and features with the aim of achieving an area of at least 10% of high diversity areas beneficial for biodiversity at national level, promoting interconnectivity between habitats and thereby maximising the potential for, as well as agricultural practices and/or productive features which contribute to biodiversity;
Amendment 179 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. takes note of the Commission’s proposal to increase the area under protection and under strict protection; notes with concern that the Commission considers extractive activities such as fishing, hunting or forestry incompatible with strict protection, as expressed in a draft technical note on criteria and guidance for protected areas designations; insists that those activities that are compatible with protection goals or even positively contribute to biodiversity protection must remain admissible in areas under strict protection; echoes paragraph 10 of the Council Conclusions of 16 October 2020 on Biodiversity which highlights that stricter level of protection may allow for certain human activities, which are in line with the conservation objectives of the protected area;
Amendment 185 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Underlines the importance of stimulating and supporting the rearing and conservation of local autochthonous/indigenous livestock breeds and varieties of traditional seeds, along with the development of modern livestock breeds and seeds;
Amendment 188 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses that where conservation measures restrict the use of privately owned land or negatively affect its value, adequate compensation must be granted to the owner;
Amendment 189 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the recognition of organic farming as a strong component on the EU’s path towards more sustainable food systems; underlines that the development of organic food production, but stresses that besides its generally positive contribution to biodiversity there are disadvantages with regard to efficiency and yields hindering the achievement of other Green Deal and UN SDG targets and that therefore organic farming should be seen as part of the solution, but not as a silver bullet; underlines that the development of organic food production must be based on a supply and demand based approach rather than an area target and must be accompanied by research, innovation and scientific transfer, market and supply chain development, and measures stimulating demand for organic food, ensuring both theaiming to support stability of the organic products market and the fair remuneration of farmers; stresses that an area target approach threatens profitability of organic farming and hence could increase dependency on subsidies which would be in contradiction to the aim of the Farm to Fork Strategy to make sustainable farming a profitable business model for European farmers;
Amendment 241 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Highlights the importance of healthy soil for biodiversity, forest conversion and agricultural ecosystem services and takes note of existing knowledge and data gaps in the area; calls on Commission and Member State to support further research in soil ecosystem services and to adjust relevant existing funding programmes in order to facilitate such research projects;
Amendment 267 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of plant protection products and tools for the stability of agricultural production and the sustainability of farmers’ incomes; considers that, although progress has been made, a substantial reduction in the use and risks of chemicalfurther efforts to reduce and mitigate the environmental impacts of pesticides use is needed; stresses the key role of integrated pest management in reducing pesticide dependency, and urges the Member States to ensure it is applied and its implementation is assessed systematically; stresses that farmers need a bigger toolbox of crop protection solutions and methods, as well as bolstered training and advisory systems; underlines that in order to achieve substantial reductions in pesticide use and risk, not only safer alternatives must become available to ensure the availability of a functioning toolbox and more efficient use must be facilitated by tools such as digital and precision farming, but also there is a need for more resistant varieties that require less input to secure stable yields; stresses the importance of new breeding techniques for making such varieties available without undue delay;
Amendment 287 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to reduce nutrient losses; stresses that a strategy to reduce nutrient losses should focus primarily on enabling farmers to increase efficiency of nutrient management and highlights the importance of innovative technologies and solutions in this regard; further calls for the strategy to consider the climate and environmental impacts of different fertilisers;
Amendment 292 #
2020/2273(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses the role of precision agriculture in the protection of biodiversity as it contributes to reducing the use of pesticides, fertilizers and water, and therefore requires strong support for this new production model through the Common Agricultural Policy;
Amendment 1 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 May 2020 on a Farm to Fork strategy1a; _________________ 1a COM(2020) 381 final
Amendment 5 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Green Deal;
Amendment 7 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 2 b (new)
Citation 2 b (new)
- having regard to the resolution on the implementation of control measures for establishing the conformity of fisheries products with access criteria to the EU market (2017/2129(INI));
Amendment 11 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 2 c (new)
Citation 2 c (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2020 on a New Industrial Strategy for Europe (2020/2076(INI));
Amendment 13 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 2 d (new)
Citation 2 d (new)
- having regard to the Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products;
Amendment 14 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Citation 2 e (new)
Citation 2 e (new)
- having regard to the European Commission Draft Initiative2a “Contingency plan for ensuring food supply and food security”, the development of which is envisaged in the Farm to Fork and Sea to Fork Strategy, as part of the European Green Deal, that predicts Commission will draw on lessons learned from past crises, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in developing the contingency plan; _________________ 2ahttps://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better- regulation/have-your- say/initiatives/12770-EU-food-supply- and-food-security-contingency-plan;
Amendment 33 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas fisheries and aquaculture products are an important source of protein and an important component of a healthy diet; notes that consumption of fish and aquaculture produces in the EU varies greatly across Member States;
Amendment 40 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas improvements in EU fish populations and the positive results in sustainable fisheries management are owed to the work of fishers and the implementation of the CFP;
Amendment 45 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products requires that consumers are informed, through marketing and educational campaigns, of the healthy value of eating fish and the wide variety of species available, as well as of the importance of understanding the information contained on labels;
Amendment 63 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A f (new)
Recital A f (new)
Af. whereas fishers address all types of marine waste coming from passively and actively fishing for marine litter and from fishing vessels themselves, to help improve the marine environment and the sustainability of the sector;
Amendment 96 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Observes that the Common Fisheries Policy is the existing legal framework with the objective of providing healthy sea-based food based on sustainable, social, economic and environmental principles for fisheries management, ensuring sustainable exploitation of living marine biological resources, and aiming to restore and maintain populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield as well as to ensure the profitability of the fishing activity;
Amendment 102 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Highlights that the current pandemic has evidenced the need for the EU to ensure food security and food sovereignty not to have to depend on food imports from third countries; Agrees with the development of a contingency plan to ensure the EU’s food supply and food security in the event of future crises; Reminds the CFP objective to contribute to the supplying of highly nutritional food to the Union market and to reducing the Union market's dependence on food imports;
Amendment 107 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Urges the European Commission to present a proposal for the revision of the Common Market Organisation (CMO) Regulation to include the obligation to inform consumers with the labelling on the origin and traceability for all prepared or preserved fish, crustaceans, molluscs and caviar and to ensure a level playing field;
Amendment 113 #
2020/2260(INI)
3. Welcomes the Commission’s assessment of the CFP, due by 2022, with a focus on the risks triggered by climate change for the sustainability of species; highlights however that an overall approach is needed also focusing on the benefits of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors;
Amendment 124 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the announced new EU Strategic Guidelines on Aquaculture; calls for its quick adoption and completion of the specific sub-sectors guidelines for shellfish and inland aquaculture in order to give direction for their funding within the new European Maritime Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund;
Amendment 130 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines that the continued work on the Farm to Fork and Sea to Fork Strategy should draw inspiration from and build on existing practices already meeting the sustainability objectives in the strategy such as certain types of aquaculture management that also provides environmental and social services;
Amendment 169 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure implementation of current EU safety, hygiene and quality requirements on all fisheries and aquaculture products on the internal market in order to ensure a level-playing field between imported and EU fisheries and aquaculture products;
Amendment 169 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Commission communication on a Farm to Fork Strategy sets out a holistic approach of the European food system, with agriculture, as a provider of food, fibre, renewable energies and fuel, at the centre, while recognising the interconnectedness and shared responsibility of all actors throughout the whole supply chain to achieve the Strategy's objectives;
Amendment 172 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Welcomes the zero tolerance approach towards IUU, recalling the international dimension of this phenomenon and the need to adopt a consistent and coherent neighbourhood policy with regard to fisheries management while fully enforcing Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 on IUU fishing;
Amendment 182 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines the necessity to establish better consultative ways for small scale fishers commercial organizations, allowing them be part of relevant decision making processes with repercussions for their livelihoods, including their participation in the Social Dialogue Committee. It is not enough his presence on the advisory councils, in a system of interplaying forces that favour the large-scales operators, to avoid the decline of their objectives of Social Responsibility, that have transferred to the organizations involved in the co- management of local fisheries to protect the ecosystem and markets, in order to prioritizing social concern and the defence of the ecosystem, as the fundamental mean of life of its affiliates;
Amendment 199 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Europe’s food system should delivers food and nutrition security in a way that contributes to social well- being and maintains and restores ecosystem health; whereas cfurrently,ther efforts are necessary in the food system isto responsible forduce a range of impacts on human and animal health and on the environment, the climate and biodiversity; whereas the way in which we produce and consume food needs to transformevolve further in order to ensure coherence with the SDGs, the Paris Agreement, the Convention on Biological Diversity and EU policies, particularly in the areaas well as in general to achieve a coherent balance between the pillars of sustainability, including the environment, climate, public health, food affordability, animal welfare, food and economic sustainability for farmers and actors further down the food chain, as well as social aspects such as working and employment conditions and health and safety standards;
Amendment 206 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses the importance of the constructive, effective and equal consultation of fishers and aquaculture producers in any decision related to the Farm to Fork and Sea to Fork Strategy.
Amendment 208 #
2020/2260(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Urges the European Commission to set up of a “List of Goods Produced by Child or Forced Labour”, so that EU policymakers and companies can rely on this list and subsequent reports to conduct risk assessments, perform due diligence on supply chains, and develop strategies to address child labour and forced labour; Encourages the Commission to use the list as a tool to take steps against non- compliant fishing vessels and non- cooperating third countries, similar to those established in Chapter VII of the IUU Regulation, particularly to restrict or block imports from fishing vessels or fishing nations (black) listed for serious labour abuse and no respect of basic human rights on board fishing vessels.
Amendment 298 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the European model of a multifunctional agricultural sector,-food sector, consisting of various farming models and driven by family farms, continues to ensure diverse quality food production, local and transparent supply chains, good agriculture practices, high environmental standards and vibrant rural areas throughout the EU;
Amendment 372 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas it is important that consumers are informed and enabled to take responsibility for the consequences of their choice of food stuffs on the whole food system, from production to processing and distribution; whereas this requires a healthy and sound food environment which ensures that the healthy and sustainable choice is also the easy and affordable choice, andthe availability of a wide variety of products to choose from, the availability of comprehensible information on parameters including nutritional and sustainability-relevant facts, as well as well-educated consumers; whereas it is important to fosters and encourages consumption patterns that support human health while ensuring the sustainable use of natural and human resources and animal welfare;
Amendment 439 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. recognises that EU’s agriculture has reduced GHG emissions by 22% in the period 1990 -2016, while in the same period the GHG emissions from agriculture have increased by 6% in the USA, by 24% in China and India and by 47% in Brazil;
Amendment 445 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas Geographical Indications result from the immemorial EU heritage and they are the fruit of the adaptation of man to his environment and an expression of the EU identity;
Amendment 461 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. recognises that EU’s agriculture has reduced the use of antibiotic burden by 35% in the period 2011 - 2018 and that the share of the veterinary burden represents 1/3 of the AMR burden in EU, while the remaining 2/3 of AMR burden is related to human antibiotics use;
Amendment 482 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the farm to fork strategy as an important step in ensuring a sustainable, fair and resilient food system, which is central to achieving the goals set out in the European Green Deal and in the SDGs; emphasises the inextricable links between healthy people, healthy societies and a healthy planet,acknowledges and integrates the three dimensions of sustainability (economic, environmental and social); emphasises the inextricable links between healthy people, healthy societies and a healthy planet; calls on the Commission to present as soon as possible an ex-ante comprehensive impact assessment of the targets set by the strategy; insists on the need for a realistic and balanced approach in the implementation of the strategy accompanying all the actors involved and taking into account the effects on the agri-food chain at all stages of the implementation process; encourages the Commission to translate the strategy into concrete legislative and non-legislative action as soon as possible;
Amendment 529 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Regrets, nevertheless, that the new strategy proposed by the European Commission focuses only on environmental and health aspects, without paying attention to the need to ensure economic and social sustainability throughout the food chain; believes that the socioeconomic prosperity of the various sectors concerned would guarantee the success of the strategy;
Amendment 544 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Highlights that the new Common Agricultural Policy reform is in line with the new farm to fork strategy and stresses the efforts already made by many European farmers in order to be more sustainable and reduce their climate and environmental impact; welcomes the introduction of new enhanced environmental measures in the new reform while keeping interventions which have been contributing to improve the agriculture sustainability, including the support to areas with natural constraints;
Amendment 549 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Considers that the European Union alone cannot effectively combat climate change without the collaboration of third countries; therefore, action at international level is necessary to extend European environmental and health standards to the rest of the world; underlines the need to introduce reciprocity in terms of food safety and environment rules in all trade agreements and to put in place legal provisions at EU level to ban imports from deforested areas;
Amendment 611 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the importance of policy coherence with existing EU policies and especially between the measures envisaged by the farm to fork strategy and Common Agriculture and Fisheries Policies, EU Trade policies, the EU Bio- economy Strategy and the EU Biodiversity Strategy; therefore underlines that the Commission should base legislative proposals on independent scientific impact assessments taking into account the cumulative effects, and evaluate existing legislation and the efficiency of its implementation and propose action which suits Member States' natural conditions;
Amendment 670 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Insists that the assessment of the sustainability of products must be based on a life-cycle approach that considers pre- and down-chain aspects such as raw material sourcing, transport and storage requirement, as well as impacts on land use and possible displacement effects that could lead to imported pollution;
Amendment 677 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Underlines that no single farming model can fulfil the various requirements for sustainable production as all models have their specific strengths and weaknesses with regard to the different pillars of sustainability, particularly climate and environmental performance including land-use; calls for a multi- model approach that focuses on exploiting the strengths of different farming models and further improving their weaknesses;
Amendment 681 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 d (new)
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Calls on the Commission to set up a comprehensive governance framework that invites the participation of all stakeholder groups in the further development and implementation of the Strategy and its subsequent measures;
Amendment 721 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 790 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that in order to achieve substantial reductions in pesticide use and risk, not only safer alternatives must become available to ensure the availability of a functioning plant protection toolbox and more efficient use must be facilitated by innovative tools such as digital and precision farming, but also there is a need for more resistant varieties that require less input to secure stable yields; stresses the importance of new innovative breeding techniques for making available such varieties and calls on the Commission to propose a regulatory framework in this regard;
Amendment 827 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Welcomes the Commission´s proposal to reduce nutrient losses; stresses that a strategy to reduce nutrient losses should focus primarily on enabling farmers to increase efficiency of nutrient management and highlights the importance of innovative technologies and solutions such as precision and smart farming and plant nutrition advisory services and management support; further calls for the strategy to consider the climate and environmental impact of different fertilisers;
Amendment 838 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Believes that the reduction in the use of pesticides should be accompanied by the introduction of alternative solutions to control epidemics, including new science-based techniques and the development of precision agriculture and integrated pest management;
Amendment 878 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 f (new)
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Believes that an EU objective for organic farming should be set in such a way as to ensure a balance between supply and demand, in order to avoid loss of farmers' income and that the distribution of efforts between Member States should be calculated taking into account the progress already made at national level;
Amendment 913 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of recognising the significant impact of agriculture and especially some animal production practices on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and land use; stresses the need to enhance natural carbon sinks and reduce agricultural emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, in particular in the feed and livestock sectors; calls for regulatory measures and targets to ensure progressive reductions in all GHG emissions in these sectors, while not degrading the quality and nutrient value of European soils and while ensuring that imports from third countries not compliant with the Strategy conditions and objectives will be subject to the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism or similar EU adjustment mechanisms to ensure fair competition for EU producers;
Amendment 921 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of recognising the significant impact of agriculture and especially animal production on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and land use; stresses the need to enhance natural carbon sinks and reduce agricultural emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, in particular in the feed and livestock sectors; recalls that European agriculture and forestry play a crucial role in addressing climate change and mitigation, as it has significant potential to reduce the emissions, to sequester carbon and to boost economies in a sustainable manner; calls for regulatory measures and targets to ensure progressive reductions in all GHG emissions in these sectors;
Amendment 960 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes note of promising developments in the area of feed additives that help to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases and water and air pollutants from animal husbandry; welcomes the Commission’s plans to facilitate the placing on the market of sustainable and innovative feed additives in this regard and calls for relevant research programmes to support the further development;
Amendment 1079 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the notion of rewarding carbon sequestration in soils; stresses, however, that intensive and industrial agriculture and farming models with negative Highlights the enormous potential of agriculture and forestry to contribute to carbon sequestration and thus achieving climate neutrality; welcomes the notion of rewarding carbon sequestration in soils under a new carbon farming initiative; invites the Commission to present several options including carbon market approaches; stresses, that all practices that reduce the climate-impacts on biodiversity should not receive climate ff farming should be taken into account in a robust accoundting orframework and be incentivised; calls for the proposals to be in line with the environmental objectives and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the Green Deal;
Amendment 1081 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the notion of rewarding carbon sequestration in soils; stresses, however, that intensive and industrial agriculture and farming models with negative impacts on biodiversity should not receive climate funding or be incentivisedand incentivising climate mitigation, adaptation and CO2 sequestration in land use, soil and biomass; therefore, calls on the Commission to explore a framework for the certification of carbon removals; highlights that the restoration of eco- systems and the development of a carbon removals market for land-based greenhouse gas sequestration would assist in restoring, maintaining and managing natural sinks and promote the Circular Economy; calls for the proposals to be in line with the environmental objectives and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the Green Deal;
Amendment 1082 #
2020/2260(INI)
6. Welcomes the notion of rewarding carbon sequestration in soils; stresses, however, that intensive and industrial agriculture and farming models with negative impacts on biodiversity should not receive climate funding or be incentivised; underlines, as for carbon sequestration, that there are still emissions that cannot be avoided and that are part of the natural cycle, this must be taken into account when implementing the legislative instruments on climate; calls for the proposals to be in line with the environmental objectives and the ‘do no harm’ principle of the Green Deal;
Amendment 1181 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Highlights the enormous potential of new varieties to contribute to various targets of the strategy by improving crop resilience, thus reducing plant protection product input, by improving efficient nutrient intake, thus reducing fertiliser input and water consumption, as well as by facilitating mitigation of crop production to different pressures resulting from climate change; stresses the importance of access to new breeding techniques in order to accelerate breeding of new varieties; recalls that achieving any ambitious input reduction target requires access to effective tools beyond merely increasing efficiency of input application; urges the Commission to propose a forward-looking regulatory framework without delay;
Amendment 1215 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for CAP National Strategic Plans to ensure adequate financial support and incentives to promote new ecological ‘green’sustainable business models for agriculture and artisanal food production, notably through fostering short supply chains and quality food production; stresses that financial support under the CAP is crucial for farmers to be able to cope with increasing environmental standards, but will fall short of enabling farmers to meet the targets of the Strategy if not accompanied by further support measures; calls for Enhanced Eco Schemes to be implemented in National Strategic Plans;
Amendment 1278 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses the importance of food security and a resilient food supply chain in the European Union, particularly in the light of the current COVID-19 pandemic; highlights the need for crisis- preparedness in a robust food system; welcomes a fostering CMO regulation and sectorial support programmes that can be implemented via National Strategic Plans;
Amendment 1292 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the European food system delivers a sufficient and varied supply of safe, nutritious, affordable and sustainable food to people at all times and underlines that increasing the economic, environmental and social sustainability of food producers will ultimately increase their resilience; recalls that in the EU 33 million people cannot afford a quality meal every second day; stresses that food affordability must remain on the political agenda and must be considered when assessing increases in production costs through changing farming practices and the effects on food prices; encourages the Commission to consider the food supply chain and its workers as a strategic asset for the safety and well-being of all Europeans;
Amendment 1306 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the European food system delivers a sufficient and varied supply of safe, nutritious, affordable and sustainable food to people at all times and underlines that increasing the economic, environmental and social sustainability of food producers will ultimatelyshould increase their resilience if they are well accompanied and supported; encourages the Commission to consider the food supply chain and its workers as a strategic asset for the safety and well-being of all Europeans and to adapt EU policies accordingly;
Amendment 1321 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that citizens’ expectations are evolving and driving significant change in the food market, with a growing demand for locally produced food as a result; emphasises the importance of locally produced food, the opportunities it offers to our farmers and the significant positive contributions it can deliver to our environment; therefore, encourages the European Commission and the Member States to actively promote the development of local food strategies, together with short supply chain initiatives;
Amendment 1348 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Highlights the contribution of pond fishing with its traditional management practices to the achievement of the targets of the farm to fork strategy and the interlinked biodiversity strategy; underlines that cultivated pond areas provide habitats for rare species, make positive contributions to climate and to water reserves, serve as nutrient sinks and sediment retention and contribute to a sustainable production of regional food; calls on Commission and Member States to consider pond fishing in relevant measures and programmes;
Amendment 1391 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses its deep concern about the emergence of zoonoticinfectious diseases that are transferred from animals to humans (anthropozoonoses), such as Q fever, avian influenza and the new strain of influenza A (H1N1), which is exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change, the destruction of biodiversity, environmental degradation and our current food production systempose a major threat to livestock health and in many cases (zoonotic diseases) pose a threat of transmission to the human population which due to its current way of life is extremely predisposed to sharing new pathogens;
Amendment 1546 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to keep including all agricultural products in its promotion policy; Urges the review of the EU promotion programme for agricultural and food products, including the EU school scheme, with a view to enhancing its contribution to sustainable production and consumption, notably by focusing on educational messages about the importance of healthy nutrition and promoting greater consumption of fruit and vegetables with the aim of reducing obesity rates;
Amendment 1560 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the review of the EU promotion programme for agricultural and food products, including the EU school scheme, with a view to enhancing its contribution to sustainable production and consumption, notably by focusing on science-based educational messages about the importance of a balanced and healthy nutrition and promoting greater consumption of fruit and vegetables with the aim of reducing obesity rates;
Amendment 1569 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls for the EU Promotion Policy to include all agricultural products living up to criteria related to sustainability (social, economic and environmental), putting special emphasis on animal welfare, pesticides and the use of antimicrobial substances to encourage all food chain operators and ensure them that they are all supported in becoming more sustainable and can all contribute to enhance global production and consumption sustainability;
Amendment 1574 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Recalls the important role of consumer choice in reaching the Strategy’s targets and highlights the indispensability of well-educated consumers in this regard; calls on Member States and regions to put more emphasis on nutritional and environmental education in their curricula and invites the Commission to develop relevant guidance;
Amendment 1599 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls the need to promote effective Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), enabling all food chain actors to become sustainable by speeding up innovation and accelerating knowledge transfer; calls on Member States to consider AKIS in the design and implementation of their National Strategic Plans; recalls, in addition, the need for a farm sustainability data network to setfor the dual purpose of setting benchmarks for farm performance and documenting the uptake of sustainable farming practices, while allowing foras well as enabling the precise and tailored application of new production approaches at farm level by providing farmers with access to fast broadband connections; cessing collected data and providing farmers easy access to locally relevant information; highlights the importance of comprehensive access to fast broadband connections to facilitate the uptake of digital farming technologies on farm level; stresses the importance of supporting farmers in acquiring know- how to make efficient use of such innovative solutions;
Amendment 1660 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for measures to reduce the burden that highly processed foods with high salt, sugar and fat content place on public health; regrets that the introduction of nutrient profiles is greatly delayed and stresses that a robust set of nutrient profiles must be developed to restrict or prohibit the use of false nutritional claims on highly processed foods high in fats, sugars and/or salt; calls for a mandatory EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition labelling system based on independent sciencerecognises the cost burden that would arise from these requirements to small and medium-size producers and their ability to compete with large manufacturers, therefore invites the Commission to propose a simplified scheme for SMEs participation;
Amendment 1677 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for measures to reduce the burden that highly processed foods with high salt, sugar and fat content place on public health; regrets that the introduction of nutrient profiles is greatly delayed and stresses that a robust set of nutrient profiles must be developed to restrict or prohibit the use of false nutritional claims on foods high in fats, sugars and/or salt; calls for a mandatory EU-wideEU-wide, category-based front-of-pack nutrition labelling system based on independent science; calls for voluntary harmonised origin labelling;
Amendment 1721 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. In the case of imported agri-food products, calls for the labelling of origin with the mention EU or if not EU with the name of the 3rd country(ies) clearly mentioned for all processed products and in all the food services/catering;
Amendment 1766 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the fact that the strategy rightly recognises the role and influence of the food environment in shaping consumption patterns and the need to make it easier for consumers to choose healthy and sustainable diets; reiterates the importance of promoting sustainable diets by raising consumer awareness of the impacts of consumption patterns and providing information on diets that are better for human health and have a lower environmental footprintproduced food; underlines that food prices must send the right signal to consumers; welcomes, therefore, the strategy’s objective that the healthy and sustainable choice should become the most affordable one, while reflecting a fair price for primary producers;
Amendment 1774 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the fact that the strategy rightly recognises the role and influence of the food environment in shaping consumption patterns and the need to make it easier for consumers to choose healthy and sustainable diets; reiterates the importance of promoting sustainable diets by raising consumer awareness of the impacts of consumption patterns and providing information on diets that are better for human health and have a lower environmental footprint; underlines that food prices must send the right signal to consumers; welcomes, therefore, the strategy’s objective that the healthy and sustare linked to production costs and that price-sensitivity of many consumers is a barrier to the uptake of more sustainably produced foods; reiterates the importance of easily avainlable choice should become the most affordable oneand comprehensible consumer information and market development measures in this regard;
Amendment 1827 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Reaffirms its belief that policy measures that are dependent solely on consumer choice unduly shift the responsibility to purchase sustainable products to consumerscalls that consumer choice is a crucial factor for the economically sustainable uptake of sustainably produced products and healthier diets; underlines the importance of good nutritional and environmental education as well as the availability of easily comprehensible relevant information in this regard; notes that third- party certification and labelling alone are not effective re an important pillar of consumer information and of creating ensuringconomic outlets for sustainabley productioned and consumptionhealthy products;
Amendment 1890 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the recognition in the strategy that Europeans’ diets are not in line with recommendations for healthy eating, and that a population-wide shift in consumption patterns is needed towards more healthy and plant-based foods and less red and processed meat, sugars, salt, and fats, which will also benefit the environment; emphasises that EU-widenational guidelines for sustainable and healthy diets would bring clarity to consumers on what constitutes a healthy and sustainable diet and informin a specific geography and contribute to Member States’ own efforts to integrate sustainability elements in national dietary advice; calls on the Commission to develop such guidelines and specific actions to effectively promote healthy pbalant-based dietced diets respecting national dietary specifics and traditions;
Amendment 1927 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that the further development of plant protein production and alternative sources of protein in the EU is a way of effectively addressing many of the environmental and climate challenges that EU agriculture is facing, as well as preventing deforestation in countries outside the EU; calls on the European Commission and the Member States to work on a solid strategy to boost the production of protein crops, with particular emphasis on leguminous crops, taking into account the benefits they bring to the environment;
Amendment 1985 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls for a revision of public and private procurement legislation, including minimum mandatory criteria in schools and other publicpublic and private institutions to encourage organic and local food productionsourcing and to promote more healthysustainable diets by creating a food environment that enables consumers to maketch their healthy choices with availability of supply;
Amendment 2008 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Underlines that binding reduction targets for environmental footprint of food products and food waste in trade and retail are needed to comprehensively achieve objectives of this strategy;
Amendment 2048 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23b. Notes that digitalisation allows for better access to data and demand forecasts, and thereby helps developing advanced production programmes for farmers, enabling them to tailor their production to demand, better coordinate with other sectors of the food supply chain, and minimise waste; stresses that given the challenging nature of reducing food waste, effective use of food waste, including in the bio economy, should be promoted;
Amendment 2051 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 c (new)
Paragraph 23 c (new)
Amendment 2102 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the importance EU funding for research and innovation as a key driver in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable, healthy and inclusive European food system while facilitating investments needed to encourage agro- ecological practices in both social and technological innovation, and the crucial role of farm advisory services in ensuring the transfer of knowledge to the farming community, drawing on the existing specialised training systems for farmers in Member States; emphasises that safeguarding innovation in animal health is essential and should be actively supported by stimulating the development and uptake of new technology and methods to improve animal health on farms; urges the Commission and Member States to allocate the necessary funding to meet this imperative objective;
Amendment 2122 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the importance EU funding for research and innovation as a key driver in accelerating the transition to a more sustainable, healthy and inclusive European food system while facilitating investments needed to encourage agro- ecologicalsustainable practices in both social and technological innovation, and the crucial role of farm advisory services in ensuring the transfer of knowledge to the farming community, drawing on the existing specialised training systems for farmers in Member States; encourages the agri-food sector to actively use the funding earmarked for the sector in Horizon Europe in this regard;
Amendment 2141 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Stresses that innovation is the main driver of resilient growth, of efficient and resource-friendly sustainable farming and of increasing its productivity and profitability; insists that the Strategy should be built on a strong European commitment to the promotion of research and development of innovative solutions and technologies in key areas such as digitalisation, precision farming, new breeding techniques, feed additives, as well as safer effective and efficient means of plant protection, fertilisation and veterinary medicines;
Amendment 2142 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Underlines that we cannot afford to lose time by refraining from using cutting-edge technologies such as new animal and plant breeding techniques, artificial intelligence and digital technologies; in particular, new breeding techniques could improve the tolerance of plant varieties to water stress and pests, as well as the disease resistance of animals; each new breeding technique should be analysed and discussed by experts on a case-by-case basis and according to strict scientific criteria;
Amendment 2171 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Calls for the establishment and the promotion of multi-stakeholder platforms that increase collaboration and mobilise the sharing of knowledge and technology, across the entire agriculture and food chain, to help scale-up innovation, advance agricultural production systems and overcome the challenges it faces;
Amendment 2228 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the global responsibility of European food systems and their key role in setting global standards for food safety, environmental protection and animal welfare; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all food and feed products imported to the EU fully meet relevant EU regulations and standards, standards, and binding objectives arising from this Strategy and to provide development assistance to support primary producers from developing countries in meeting those standards; welcomes the Commission’s intention to take the environmental impacts of requested import tolerances into account;
Amendment 2237 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the global responsibility of European food systems and their key role in setting global standards for food safety, environmental protection and animal welfare; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all food and feed products imported to the EU fully meet relevant EU regulations and standards and to provide development assistancecreate partnerships to support primary producers from developingglobal partner countries in meeting those standards; welcomes the Commission’s intention to take the environmental impacts of requested import tolerances into account;
Amendment 2248 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. As trade has to be taken into account in a transition towards more sustainable and resilient agri-food systems, calls on the Commission to integrate the sustainability and food security objectives of the F2F in its review on going of the EU Trade Policy; in the context of this review, calls on the Commission to build a dedicated framework for agri-food products in trade relations, in order to ensure our food sovereignty and security, and protect and promote EU sustainable agri-food standards and EU quality schemes;
Amendment 2249 #
2020/2260(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Recalls that trade agreements must ensure that the parties involved participate actively in promoting sustainable development principles; international standards that are in line with European environmental and climate ambitions for sustainable growth must also be guaranteed; in addition, in order to ensure a global transition to sustainable food systems, these agreements should make the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and compliance to this as essential and binding elements;
Amendment 47 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the Commission’s decision to carry out initiatives aimed at enhancing cooperation among tax authorities and increased harmoniscoordination of procedural rules across the single market is of the highest importance; welcomes the Commission’s initiative for the ‘EU cooperative compliance programme’;
Amendment 80 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the Union decision- making process is not promoting change, as tax policy is a national prerogative and subject to unanimity; regrets that the current situation sometimes leads to an uneven or inconsistent application of tax regulations; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure more harmonised and consistent tax rules and their implementation, to protect the functioning of the single market and to assure the principle of “taxing where profit is generated”;
Amendment 88 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes note of the existing limits on decision making in the Council and calls for exploring all legal options as provided in the Treaties on taxation especially in order to ensure functionality of the single market and preserve Union competitiveness in the global market;on taxation matters in the Council.
Amendment 147 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the two-pillar agreement reached at the G7/G20 levels on the allocation of taxing rights and the application of a minimum effective tax rate of at least 15% on the global profits of MNEs; notes the need for effective implementation; calls on the Commission to make the necessary legislative proposals to implement the agreement, namely on PILLAR II, into Union law as quickly as possible after the finalisation of the technical work on the OECD approach;
Amendment 185 #
2020/2254(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – Part B – Recommendation B1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex I – Part B – Recommendation B1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The European Parliament calls on the European Commission to analyse the extent of the problem and if necessary to bring forward initiatives to ensure a more consistent determination of tax residency within the Single Market by 2022.
Amendment 19 #
2020/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
Citation 12 a (new)
— having regard to the Special Eurobarometer 505 entitled 'Making our food fit for the future - Citizens' expectations',
Amendment 265 #
2020/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. When enhancing animal welfare legislation in the EU, farmers' income and competitiveness of European livestock producers in the global agricultural market needs to be taken into account;
Amendment 288 #
2020/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Points out that practices intended to improve animal well-being usually incur higher production costs and increase farmers’ workload, and that this must be offset by corresponding remuneration; stresses, by way of example, that phasing in loose housing for pregnant sowin farrowing units would require a 30-year transition period to ensure that the additional costs incurred are recouped from the market, and that the least onerous way of introducing this is to construct new buildings, something that can only be done with the cooperation of the authorities in issuing building permits;
Amendment 293 #
2020/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that some measures believed to improve animal welfare are in fact counterproductive and may undermine other aspects of sustainability, namely welfare and health safety-related issues, as well as efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; cites, by way of example, that keeping rabbits in the open air increases stress and mortality levels, and that installing collective cages in rabbitries leads to aggressive behaviour among does, causing stress, injury and reduced performance, and that there is a linear relation between increasing pen dimensions and ammonia emissions leaving the farmers faced with conflicting legislations on animal welfare and environmental issues;
Amendment 306 #
2020/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recalls that the full implementation of the current legislation in every Member State is crucial to enhance on-farm animal welfare and to ensure fair level playing field in the internal market;
Amendment 350 #
2020/2085(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Invites the Commission to take better notice of the specificities of rabbit farming;
Amendment 5 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the agriculture, food and forestry sectors and rural areas are essential components of the circular economy; and underlines that the circular economy and bio-economy can provide solutions to the new challenges facing the agricultural sector caused and highlighted by the COVID-19 crisis by reducing the vulnerability of value chains within the EU and globally;
Amendment 15 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that the announcement of the action plan is a clarion call for profound change to reorient farm production models towards agro-ecology, given the degradation and scarcity both in natural resources and in the rest ofacceleration and realisation of the full potential of the circular economy and the bio-economy in the agriculture sector and across the food- supply chain;
Amendment 28 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the implementation of a European protein plan advocating consumption of legumes, asto become more independent of protein imports; moreover, growing new protein crops in Europe could give an opportunity to farmers; the production of crops that need no nitrogen- based fertilisers has an additional advantage;
Amendment 32 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Highlights the important role of bio-based products, including for example, the better recovery and use of bio-waste, in the transition to a circular carbon-neutral economy;
Amendment 34 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Sees the circular bio-economy as an opportunity for agriculture, enabling it generate renewable energy from biodegradable farm and municipal waste and its by-products: organic fertilisers; Considers that the circular economy and bio-economy offers great potential for farmers and their cooperatives in the transition towards a climate-neutral European economy through for example, advanced bio- refineries that produce bio-fertilisers, protein feed, bioenergy and biochemicals; highlights that farmers have the potential to produce renewable energy such as biogas from agricultural waste and residues such as manure, or from other sources of waste and residues from the food industry, sewage, wastewater and municipal waste; urges greater research, prioritisation and investment in these options;
Amendment 38 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Considers that value-added utilisation of agro-residue and agro- bioenergy are important drivers for the circular economy and bio-economy, and that in the EU, renewable energy obtained through agro-residues have significant potential and should be explored with further research, investment and a supportive policy framework.
Amendment 42 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Underlines the essential role of sustainable forest management in circular and bioeconomy, where the wood-based materials function as carbon storages and substitute fossil and other non-renewable materials in many industrial applications such as construction, fibre products, textiles, composites, bioplastics, renewable energy and chemicals while increasing forest resources serve as sinks;
Amendment 45 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Highlights that the transformation towards a circular economy and bio- economy can only be accelerated and scaled when business incentives are aligned with policy goals and a supportive policy framework;
Amendment 46 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Notes that the development of the circular economy and bio-economy will create more jobs in the primary production and stresses that the bio economy requires new skills, new knowledge and new disciplines be developed and/or integrated further in training and education in this sector in order to tackle bio economy-related societal changes, promote competitiveness, growth and job creation, meet the needs of the sector and ensure that skills and jobs are better matched;
Amendment 50 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. HopNotes that thee potential of a fully implemented circular economy willto contribute to the relodiversification of agriculture and food producincome for farmers and the contribution ait local level by strengthening regional and local food systemcan make downstream in the rural economy, bringing benefits to both agriculture and rural communities;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 66 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for prevention measures to be stepped up in the fight against food loss and waste; and stresses that food wastage has huge environmental consequences, contributes to climate change and represents a waste of limited resources such as land, energy and water; therefore, urges the Commission via the Farm to Fork Strategy to introduce swift proposals to implement the goal of halving food waste by 2030;
Amendment 73 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Stresses that, in order to reduce wastage at the production stage, innovative techniques and technologies should be used to optimise performance in the fields and convert those products that do not meet market standards into processed goods;
Amendment 74 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Notes the benefits of cooperation and digitalisation, which allows better access to data and demand forecasts, and developing advance production programmes for farmers, enabling them totailor their production to demand, better coordinate with the other sectors of the food supply chain, and minimise wastage; given the challenging nature of reducing unavoidable food waste, stresses that effective use of food waste, including in the bio economy, should be promoted;
Amendment 76 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8 c. Notes the potential within the circular economy for optimisation of use of food unavoidably lost or discarded and by-products from the food chain, in particular those of animal origin, in feed production, nutrient recycling and production of soil improvers and their importance for primary production;
Amendment 78 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8 d. Notes the potential for optimisation of former foodstuff and by- products from the food chain in feed production and its importance for primary production; calls for an multi-stakeholder approach to collect unsold, unconsumed and inedible food and redirecting it into feed manufacture and also consequently calls on the Commission to analyse legal barriers to the use of former foodstuffs in feed production and to promote research in this area, while at the same time stressing the need for increased traceability, compliance with biosecurity standards and using separation and treatment processes that bring food safety risk down to zero;
Amendment 81 #
2020/2077(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the use of bio-sourced and biodegradable materials in agricultural plastics; underlines the need for clear labelling of plastics that are biodegradable and plastics that are merely bio-sourced and non-biodegradable; welcomes the intention to develop a policy framework for sourcing, labelling and use of bio-based plastics, and highlights that non-food crops, waste products and side streams of the agro-industry should be the main source for bio-plastics;
Amendment 10 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the Commission’s amended MFF proposal of 27 and 28 May, including the communication entitled ‘Europe’s moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation’, with its provision to increase funding for the Common Agricultural Policy in comparison to the previous MFF proposal;
Amendment 12 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Stresses that this increased funding is essential for delivering on the proposed objectives and ambition of the future CAP, achieving the Green Deal objectives in agriculture to strengthen the resilience of the agri-food sectors and to ensure sustainable food production which depends not only on a well-funded CAP but also on other MFF instruments such as research, investment in innovation or digital technology and the facilitation of farmer’s and the agri-food sector’s access to them;
Amendment 14 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Welcomes the proposal to top up the Just Transition Fund (JTF), including with additional funds from Next Generation EU, and the two additional pillars of the Just Transition Mechanism, namely a dedicated scheme under InvestEU and a public sector loan facility and stresses that in order for the JTF and green transition to be successful and impactful for agriculture and rural areas, it must be undertaken in a fair, inclusive and scientifically underpinned manner together with stakeholders;
Amendment 16 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Takes note of the Commission communication on the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan (COM(2020)0021), but emphasiszes that the elements proposed within it, including the Just Transition Fund, depend entirely on an ambitious MFF agreement; expresses its deep concern that the front-loading of EU budget funds to cover new spending requirements stemming from the COVID- 19 pandemic may result in a funds shortage in later programming years which may impact on the ability of the agriculture sector to deliver on the objectives and ambition of the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies and deprive EU farmers of funding in the latter years of the MFF, which would be particularly damaging if they are expected to comply with new obligations under the Green Deal;
Amendment 19 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the proposal of the Commission to allocate 15 billion Euros to Rural Development in the context of the "Next Generation UE", but regrets that no allocation has been proposed for the first pillar of the CAP within this new instrument, taking into account the need to improve direct payments and the support to sectorial programs to help farmers overcome the Covid-19 crisis and comply with the new Green Deal objectives;
Amendment 20 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines the importance of facilitating access to public and private finance to support increased green investment, development and access to the digitalization tools, modernization and innovation that will enable farmers, the agricultural sector and rural areas to meet the challenges and opportunities of realizing the objectives and ambition of the Green Deal;
Amendment 25 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Ensure the possibility for small and medium size companies in rural areas, including farms, to make use of investments funds;
Amendment 28 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stress that the differing starting points and potential for development of different regions and Member States must be taken into consideration in the development of national plans, allocation of funding and in the longer term financial perspective;
Amendment 37 #
2020/2058(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that a significant percentage of the common agricultural policy (CAP) envelope, which represents the largest share of the EU budget, will be set aside to support climate-related objectives; recalls that the reform of the CAP is still ongoing and that no decision has yet been made on the exact contribution to environmental and climate- related objectives and requirements;
Amendment 103 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the Commission’s amended MFF proposal of 27 and 28 May, including the communication entitled ‘Europe’s moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation’, with its provision to increase funding for the Common Agricultural Policy in comparison to the previous MFF proposal;
Amendment 106 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 233 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the proposal to top up the Just Transition Fund (JTF), including with additional funds from Next Generation EU, and the two additional pillars of the Just Transition Mechanism, namely a dedicated scheme under InvestEU and a public sector loan facility, which will contribute to allevi and stresses that ing the economic effects of the transition to climate neutrality on the order for the JTF and green transition to be successful and impactful for agriculture and rural areas, it moust vulnerable regions in the EU; be undertaken in a fair, inclusive and scientifically underpinned manner together with stakeholders;
Amendment 241 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Takes note of the Commission communication on the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan(COM(2020)0021), but emphasizes that the elements proposed within it, including the Just Transition Fund, depend entirely on an ambitious MFF agreement; expresses its deep concern that the front-loading of EU budget funds to cover new spending requirements stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic may result in a funds shortage in later programming years which may impact on the ability of the agriculture sector to deliver on the objectives and ambition of the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies and deprive EU farmers of funding in the latter years of the MFF, which would be particularly damaging if they are expected to comply with new obligations under the Green Deal;
Amendment 296 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reaffirms its previous position regarding candidates for new own resources, and calls oninvites the Commission to propose new own resources which correspond to essential EU objectives including the fight against climate change and the protection of the environment; asks, therefore, for the introduction of new own resources based on the auction revenues of the Emissions Trading System, a contribution on non-recycled plastic packaging waste, the future Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base or a precursor based on operations of large enterprises, a tax on digital companies, and a financial transaction taxexplore avenues for introduction of such potential new own resources which correspond to essential EU objectives;
Amendment 365 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Amendment 368 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Stress that the differing starting points and potential for development of different regions and Member States must be taken into consideration in the development of national plans, allocation of funding and in the longer term financial perspective;
Amendment 383 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Recalls that a significant percentage of the common agricultural policy (CAP) envelope will be used to support environmental and climate- related objectives and requirements; recalls that the reform of the CAP is still ongoing and discussions are underway concerning these environmental and climate-related objectives and requirements;
Amendment 543 #
2020/2058(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Invites the Commission to revise the Energy Tax Directive and coordinate a kerosene tax that could also feed into the EU budgetdiscussion on other possible types of measures regarding the energy and transport sectors;
Amendment 4 #
2020/2039(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas agricultural workers inrural areas, particularly those living in remote areas, suffering from demographic disadvantages, face anexceptional higher risk of poverty and social exclusion;
Amendment 5 #
2020/2039(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas rural areas that are faced with depopulation may experience land abandonment and increased risk of forest fires and face difficulties in their economic recovery 1a; _________________ 1aForest fires — Sparking fire smart policies in the EU, European Commission (2018).
Amendment 11 #
2020/2039(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas, EU Cohesion Policy makes a key contribution to delivering Digital Single Market objectives on the ground, in particular through significant financial allocations from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF);
Amendment 24 #
2020/2039(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the ongoing depopulation of rural areas, which leads to difficulties in accessing public services or inadequate health coverage, is not only having serious economic and social consequences but also hampering our chances of achieving the Green Deal’s ambitious objectives;
Amendment 32 #
2020/2039(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission, in developing the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies, to take practical steps to maintain the rural population, to develop local economies that would create job opportunities;
Amendment 57 #
2020/2039(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Supports innovation and digitisation with a view to promoting a vibrant, dynamic rural environment; calls on the Commission to draw on the smart cities and towns initiatives to develop a new instrument to support start-ups in rural areas, thereby also boosting their economic and productive fabric;, in order to pave the way a digital economy in rural areas; Calls on the Commission to support the financing of renewable resources as part of the Green deal/ Bioeconomy which can generate jobs and can help with the economic renewal of many rural areas2a; _________________ 2a Bioeconomy : investments in wool,which is a quintessentially natural fiber, resistant and durable can create new opportunities and reduce pollution by reducing the use of plastic, and bring innovative solutions for eco farming and keeping water and carbon into soils . The wool processing industry was delocalised from Europe.
Amendment 18 #
2020/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Highlights that the COVID-19 crisis has strongly hit tourism activities in rural areas, and this has had a significant negative impact on revenues coming from agri-tourism. Therefore calls the European Commission and Member States to strengthen agri-tourism initiatives as part of the recovery plan and to ring-fence a specific allocation.
Amendment 25 #
2020/2038(INI)
2b. Stresses the benefits of rural tourism and calls on the Commission and the Member States to further promote and support initiatives, which would generate additional income sources for rural areas, job opportunities and prevent depopulation.
Amendment 55 #
2020/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that rural tourism provides between 10 and 20% of rural income and employment, twice tourism’s income and employment levels averaged across Europe, and offers two-fold benefits: income diversification for farmers and a wide opportunity to connect consumers with the origins of food, biodiversity and nature, which contributes to the transmission of a high quality image of EU agriculture.
Amendment 2 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication of 9 July 2020 entitled 'Getting ready for changes. Communication on readiness at the end of the transition period between the European Union and the United Kingdom' (COM(2020) 324),
Amendment 11 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas all actions taken to create a Capital Markets Union (CMU) should have as their core objectives improving the range of financing options offered to companies and citizens, as well as fostering the availability of a greater range of more attractive investment offers, as their objectiveto incentivise financial participation and to turn savers into investors; whereas access to equity financing for SMEs, entrepreneurs and the social economy has become even more crucial for the COVID-19 recovery;
Amendment 29 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the actions taken so far to achieve the CMU are moving in the right direction; whereas much work nevertheless remains to be done in terms of the precision, effectiveness and simplification of the measures adopted; whereas an ambitious vision for the CMU project is essential to overcome national sensitivities and build the momentum to complete the CMU;
Amendment 42 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the social and economic crisis resulting from COVID-19 will have a particularly negative impact on SMEs and retail savers; whereas the EU’s response to COVID-19 through the European Recovery Plan should provide a large injection of capital in order to increase European enterprises’ access to finance; whereas capital market financing is needed to increase the overall financing capacity and to reduce the reliance on bank lending in the EU;
Amendment 47 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the market movements resulting from COVID-19 have acted as a real-life “stress test” on the robustness of the whole financial ecosystem, and should be followed up with a detailed assessment of the benefits and shortcomings of the existing EU rulebook on financial stability and financial supervision;
Amendment 53 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the Capital Markets Union should be a key contributor to the transition towards a sustainable and resilient economy to complement public investment, in line with the EU Green Deal; whereas the EU should aim to consolidate its position as a global leader in sustainable finance with an ambitious model and rulebook for sustainable investments which should be promoted as part of the EU values and as the gold- standard on the international level;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas recent announcements from the UK authorities on future regulatory divergence confirm the need for a careful assessment, in each area on a forward-looking and on-going basis, of the risks for the EU in terms of financial stability, market transparency, market integrity, investor protection and level- playing field when granting and maintaining equivalence, due to the current interconnectedness between the EU and the United Kingdom markets;
Amendment 60 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C d (new)
Recital C d (new)
Cd. whereas financial stability and the integrity of the single market can only be preserved with a robust approach to third- countries access to the EU’s market and a dynamic monitoring system on equivalence regimes; whereas it is recalled that equivalence can only be granted if the regulatory and supervisory regime and standards of the relevant third-country are deemed fully equivalent by the Commission to those of the EU in order to ensure a level playing field;
Amendment 64 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C e (new)
Recital C e (new)
Amendment 69 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the removal of barriers, including the simplification of legislation where relevant and conducive to financial stability, to diversify funding sources for SMEstart-ups, SMEs and mid-caps, in order to promote SMEs’their ability to access equity markets, and to reduce the existing debt bias; points out that the current situation makes SMEs more fragile and vulnerablnotes that necessary measures include facilitating investment research, streamlining the definition of SMEs across relevant EU legislation, and easing issuance requirements to ensure that start-ups, SMEs and mid-caps find their way to public markets; calls on the Member States to rebalance debt-equity bias in taxation; points out that the current situation makes SMEs more fragile and vulnerable; calls on the introduction of an ‘SME test’ for impact assessments on each CMU initiative;
Amendment 113 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for a review of the ELTIF Regulation and of related prudential calibrations in the banking and insurance regulatory frameworks to enhance the take-up and attractiveness of this innovative European label; notes that creating of a new additional ELTIF regime, based on an open-ended fund structure with the possibility to redeem at set intervals, could offer a new opportunity for retail investors to benefit from a diversified portfolio of long-term investments;
Amendment 122 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Requests the Commission to assess how targeted amendments to the Securitisation Regulation could free up financing capacity; such targeted amendments could include the realignment of the treatment of cash and synthetic securitisations, of the treatment of regulatory capital and liquidity with that of covered bonds and loans, as well as with the disclosure and due diligence requirements for covered bonds and simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisation;
Amendment 127 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for targeted measures within securities market legislation tohat could help expedite the recovery after the COVID-19 crisis; supports as part of a broad package of measures to increase public and private financing; welcomes targeted changes in the Prospectus Regulation, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID), and the Securitisation Regulation and the Market Abuse Regulations long as they aim to preserve market liquidity and transparency, and to facilitate investments in the real economy, in particular in SMEs, and tomid-caps; notes that, allowing newcomers and new products to enter the markets, preserving consumer protection and market integrity; incumbent market players to offer new innovative products while preserving consumer protection and market integrity, is one of the strongest assets of the EU single market;
Amendment 188 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that the Solvency 2 Directive requires a review by the end of 2020 and that the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) will provide technical advice to the Commission after consultations with different stakeholders; requests the Commission and EIOPA to consider adjusting the capital requirements for investments in equity and private debt, in particular of SMEs and mid-caps, to ensure that incentives for insurers and pension funds do not penalise equity investments; strongly calls on insurers and re-insurers to draw conclusions from the COVID-19 crisis, including on the coverage of pandemic-related risks; encourages the rapid phasing out of national exemptions and to the reduction of ‘gold-plating’ in national implementation of Solvency II, to foster harmonisation and integration of the EU insurance and re-insurance market;
Amendment 200 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the need for European and national ssupervisory convergence to promote a common European model, highlights the crucial role of the European Supervisory aAuthorities to overcome their differences; calls for supervisory convergence to promote a common European model, guided by the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA),(ESAs) in facilitating this; recalls the additional competences given and structural changes made to the ESAs by the recently adopted Regulation (EU) 2019/2175; calls on the ESAs, together with the national supervisory authorities, to implement and exercise these changes as soon as possible to allow the ESAs to act swiftly to preserve financial stability and the orderly functioning and integrity of the market, and to reduce the existing obstacles to cross-border financial operations;
Amendment 214 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Observes that financial services regulation is a very complex undertaking, with regulation at international, European and national level; encourages all relevant actors to address this complexity to ensure the proportionality of financial regulation and to remove unnecessary administrative burdens; also notes that proportionality of financial regulation can sometimes lead to increased complexity, and calls on the Commission and Member States to commit to significant efforts to streamline and harmonise existing and future rules, by phasing out national exemptions as appropriate, and by preventing ‘gold- plating’ of EU law at national level; highlights that Regulations with clear timelines for transition and phasing out of existing regimes can build a smooth and steady path to regulatory convergence;
Amendment 219 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to present a detailed road map to strengthen the robustness of the financial ecosystem, drawing lessons from the benefits and the shortcomings of the existing EU rulebook on financial stability and financial supervision, identified during the COVID- 19 crisis; takes note of the recent recommendations from the ESRB, notably on liquidity risks arising from margin calls and liquidity risks in investment funds;
Amendment 226 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned that retail investors’ engagement with financial markets remains low; calls for measures to promote retail investments in view of the demographic challenges faced by the EU by increasing the participation of retail investors in capital markets through more attractive and appropriate personal pension products; calls on the Commission to put forward initiatives specifically targeting retail investors, including facilitating the development of independent web-based EU comparison tools, to help retail investors determine the most appropriate products in terms of risk, return on investment and value for their particular needs, and promoting incentives for ESG products and products typically associated with better value for money;
Amendment 236 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises that access to financial markets should be possible for all enterprises under the ‘same business, same rules’ principle; notes that this principle is particularly relevant in the FinTech and financial innovation spaces, and that reciprocal access to financial data should be balanced with the need to have a level playing field across all providers and product types;
Amendment 241 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls the existence of different shortcomings in the legislation on packaged retail investment and insurance products (PRIIPs) that should be addressed in the next reviewas soon as possible, ahead of the application of the PRIIPs rules to UCITS products; expects that Level 2 PRIIPs legislation on the Key Investor Document to respect lwill be aligned with the Level 1 text, in particular in relation to the performance scenarproviding accurate, fair, clear and non-misleading pre- contractual informatiosn; regrets the delays in the adoption of Level 2 PRIIPs legislation that will overlap with the first review of PRIIPs, and which increases legal uncertainty and costs for stakeholdermarket participants, and could reduce understanding and confidence from retail investors; calls for a more fundamental review of rules applicable to the distribution of financial products across the entirety of the retail investment space, in particular under MiFID, IDD and PRIIPs, aiming to harmonise and streamline the EU rulebook as appropriate; notes that EU rules on consumer protection should be adapted to the green and the digital transformations and put the interest of the retail investor at the forefront, regardless of the different types of providers and products;
Amendment 316 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Highlights that ‘sandboxes’ may be an adequate tool to enhance the innovation and competitiveness of the financial services sector; requests that the Commission create a pan-European ‘sandbox’ for financial servic provided that sufficient safeguards are in place to prevent potential threats to the integrity, transparency, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, and to the stability of the financial system; requests that the Commission draws upon the experience gained from the European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF) to assess whether a pan-European ‘sandbox’ for financial services would provide additional benefits for financial innovation; asserts that such a pan- European ‘sandbox’ should be established within the direct supervisory remit of the joint ESAs committee, in cooperation with relevant national supervisory authorities;
Amendment 327 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Reiterates that EU legislation provides for the possibility of considering third-country rules as equivalent based on a technical, proportional and risk-based analysis, and that such decisions should be taken through a delegated act; recalls that the EU can unilaterally withdraw any equivalence decision; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the ESAs, and where relevant with National Competent Authorities, to establish a dynamic monitoring system on equivalence regimes, in the case of third country regulatory and supervisory divergences which could entail potential risks for the EU in terms of financial stability, market transparency, market integrity, investor and consumer protection and level-playing field; highlights that the Commission should have emergency procedures in place to withdraw equivalence decisions in case of the need to swiftly act, bearing in mind the potential consequences of an emergency withdrawal of an equivalence decision;
Amendment 334 #
2020/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Reiterates the need for a more streamlined and codified representation of the EU in multilateral organisations/bodies, following the European Parliament resolution of 12 April 2016 on the EU role in the framework of international financial, monetary and regulatory institutions and bodies; notes that promoting EU values and global competitiveness of the EU’s financial sector when making policy at European and international level is ever more crucial as the multilateral world order further polarises;
Amendment 42 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas stablecoins have the potential to become a widely used means of payment;
Amendment 44 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the People’s Bank of China is trialling a central bank digital currency (the DCEP); highlights that the potential global use of the DCEP could have implications for international trade and consumer protection;
Amendment 119 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that FinTech will be integral to the success of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) and encourages the Commission to consider how to harness the benefits of FinTech in driving forward capital market integration in the Union, in particular, the participation of retail investors;
Amendment 125 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises the increased importance of monitoring and reviewing measures relating to the regulation of digital finance, particularly bearing in mind the increasing relevance of this sector as the world deals with the COVID- 19 pandemic;
Amendment 126 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Encourages the relevant authorities in the Union to assess the impact of the risks and benefits of the potential global use of the DCEP and its interdependency with China's national blockchain platform;
Amendment 137 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commissionommends the Commission’s initiative to establish a European Forum for Innovation Facilitators (EFIF) in April 2019; Calls on the Commission to draw upon the knowledge and experience derived from the EFIF and to act as first mover in order to create a favourable environment for European FinTech hubs and firms to scale up;
Amendment 146 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Stresses that lawmeasures taken should ensure that market players, from small to large, have the regulatory space to innovate and that regulation and supervision in the area of FinTech should be based on the following principles:
Amendment 171 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that Union level measuresmeasures adopted at EU level should not stifle opportunities for businesses to grow and develop within the Union and beyond;
Amendment 173 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes the continually evolving methods used for money laundering and terrorist financing; emphasises, therefore, the need for the Commission’s approach to digital finance to be cognisant of this and sufficiently robust to combating ML/TF;
Amendment 202 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that developing a pan- European taxonomy for crypto-assets is desirable as a step towards fostering a common understanding, facilitating collaboration across jurisdictions and providing greater regulatory certainty for market participants engaged in cross border activity; recommends taking into account the importance of international cooperation and global initiatives as regards frameworks for crypto-assets, bearing in mind in particular their borderless nature; cautionproposes, however, that developing an open-ended taxonomy template may be more appropriate for this evolving market segment;
Amendment 204 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Emphasises that such an open taxonomy must be based on common understandings of the various crypto- assets involved; requests, therefore that the definitions of crypto-assets and their subclasses be harmonised across EU and member states;
Amendment 206 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Stresses that any definition of crypto-assets must take into account future evolution of the crypto-asset market;
Amendment 207 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Points out that, at this stage, the use of stablecoins is not yet prominent within the Union; highlights the need for any future stablecoin-specific framework to be born out of the coming crypto-asset framework, representing an evolution of the legislation with the aim of offering the similar level of security as existing means of payments; believes that before any framework for stablecoins is developed, the architecture of this form of crypto- asset must be examined thoroughly;
Amendment 272 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to propose legislative changes in the area of ICT and cyber security requirements for the Union financial sector in order to address any inconsistencies, gaps and loopholes that are found to exist in relevant law; in this regard, calls on the Commission to consider the need to have a supervisory overview of the ICT providers, noting the concentration and contagions risks that can be posed by a heavy reliance by the financial services sector on a small number of ICT and cloud computing providers;
Amendment 280 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 – point a
Paragraph 16 – point a
a. modernisation of ICT governance and risk management;
Amendment 288 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to enhance cooperation at international fora in order to facilitate the development of international standards as regards cloud computing and out-sourcing; points out that international standards developed in these areas could then be adopted into an EU-specific framework in order to bring oversight of cloud computing and outsourcing into line with the level of oversight of legacy systems;
Amendment 297 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls that the collection and analysis of data play a central role for FinTech, and therefore highlights the need for consistent, technology-neutral application of existing data laws; highlights that Artificial Intelligence is one of the key technologies as regards enhancing the Union's competitiveness on a global level;
Amendment 301 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Stresses that the free flow of data within the EU is needed to scale up innovative finance; points out that cross- border data flows, including to and from third countries, must be monitored and governed by EU legislative principles on data privacy and data protection;
Amendment 306 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Requests, in this regard, that the Commission examines how to ensure that digital finance entities can access on an equitable basis relevant and useful data, to help ensure thatfoster the potential of digital finance and to provide the opportunities for innovative FinTech businesses canto grow within the Union and beyond;
Amendment 309 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Amendment 316 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Requests that the Commission consider a framework, based on the existing EU standard eIDAS, an infrastructure for digital onboarding and the use of digital financial identities, which would aim to harmonise these measures across the Union insofar as necessary;
Amendment 318 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Points out that for KYC processes legal requirements for retail onboarding by financial institutions are different in every member state and therefore cross border onboarding with existing data sets are often not possible, which is also valid for onboarding of corporate clients and its related KYC/KYB (know your business) process; calls on the Commission to address this issue and foster the harmonisation of the KYC data required by member states;
Amendment 324 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Considers that a self-sovereign identity (SSI) based on distributed ledger technologies (DLT) can be a key element in developing a range of new services and platforms for the digital single market, independent from data aggregators and avoiding intermediaries, while at the same time providing high security and data protection standards for individual EU citizens;
Amendment 361 #
2020/2034(INL)
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – point 2
Annex I – part B – point 2
2. To make a legislative proposal on cyber resilience, which ensures consistent standards of ICT security across the Union financial sector. Such a framework should be future-oriented and focus on modernising the current rules applicable concerning cyber resilience, while also closing any regulatory loopholes and gaps, which may put businesses, investors and consumers at risk. Such a proposal should take due account of the risk of concentration and contagion stemming from the over reliance on a small number of ICT service providers, particularly cloud computing providers;
Amendment 2 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the demographic old-age dependency ratio (people aged 65 or above relative to those aged 15-64) is projected to increase significantly in the EU as a whole in the coming decades; whereas it has risen to 29.631.4 % oin 2016 figures91a, and is projected to rise further, notably up to 52 % in 20501b and reaching 51.2 % in 2070; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/ view/tps00198/default/table?lang=en 1b https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/ view/tps00200/default/table?lang=en
Amendment 6 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas Europe's ageing population is a demographic phenomenon which sees a decrease both in fertility and in mortality rate and a higher life expectancy among European population;
Amendment 9 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas the demographic situation severely impacts the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the EU; whereas it is important for the EU to mainstream demographic issues into all its policies;
Amendment 30 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 50 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that an ageing workforce and the lack of generational renewal constitute a more serious issue in the agricultureal sector than in other sectors; believes that addressing market uncertainty and lack of profitability in farming enterprisesfacilitating access to finance for the farming enterprises, particularly for young farmers, are key to reversing this trend;
Amendment 56 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Acknowledges that only 11% of all farm holdings in the European Union are run by farmers under the age of 40 years old2a; calls on the Member States to remove all barriers preventing young farmers from entering the agricultural sector, including the difficult access to land; calls furthermore on the Member States to promote new ways of collaboration between generations such as partnerships, share-farming, long-term leasing and other arrangements which could address the lack of land and stimulate young farmers; _________________ 2ahttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/Farmers_and_the_a gricultural_labour_force_-_statistics
Amendment 81 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recognises the prominent role that the cohesion policy and the CAP could play in encouraging and boosting the employability and inclusion of women in rural and remote areas affronted with demographic-related issues and calls on the Member States to better use the relevant funds for that purpose;
Amendment 84 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Notes that improving the connectivity and the accessibility of services in the rural and remote areas is crucial to address the depopulation of these regions and the social and digital exclusion of the older population living there; therefore, calls on the Member States to recognise the significance of rural and remote areas, in their diversity, and develop their potential through stimulating investments in the local economy, fostering entrepreneurship and improving their infrastructure;
Amendment 89 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Considers the possibilities created by lifelong learning, in combination with digitalisation, essential to provide the ageing population in the rural and remote areas with various opportunities, including supplementary income; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to support educational and training programs, that will help the ageing population to develop skills and gain expertise in areas such as eCommerce, online marketing and ICT;
Amendment 92 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Highlights that due to the evolution, digitalization and specialization of agriculture, both people within the sector and those first entering in it, require an appropriate level of digital, technical and economic training and calls for the promotion of exchange schemes, discussions, online trainings and e- learning;
Amendment 94 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5 e. Reminds that the outermost regions are especially predisposed to depopulation and require a special set of measures to mitigate negative demographic changes they often face; calls on the Member States to use proactively the available structural and investment funds in order to address the challenges these regions face;
Amendment 96 #
2020/2008(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 f (new)
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5 f. Underlines the essential impact the constantly evolving digital technologies have on people’s daily life, thus stresses the need for high-speed broadband and vital and up-to-date technological equipment in schools, hospitals and all other relevant public services facilities, including developing effective e- Governance, in order to ensure there are enough opportunities for the people living in rural and remote areas.
Amendment 4 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for binding Union law to be adopted that ensures that allthe supply chains of products imported into the Union and also of those products and services supplied within the Union do not involvedo not lead to deforestation and, ecosystem degradation or conversion, or, human rights violations, and that protects or the violation of rights of indigenous peoples and local communities;
Amendment 21 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that forest policy is a national competence and that, on the Union level, the Standing Forestry Committee steers the preparation of forest-related views regarding policy initiatives;
Amendment 26 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that although voluntary measures alone will not stop deforestation, binding legislation should be combined with non-legislative initiatives, such as cooperation with third countries, in order to fight against global deforestation;
Amendment 32 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Supports the setting up of “green alliances” with third countries in order to help them put in place sustainable forest value chains and bio-economy activities prioritising the support to small producers, as well as sound policies aiming at avoiding deforestation, such as integrated land planning, land tenure transparency, and prevention of illegal conversion of forest areas into agricultural land;
Amendment 33 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Supports regular information exchanges with third countries to promote the consumption and trade of wood and wood derived products coming from forest managed in a sustainable way;
Amendment 35 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Regrets that the Union embodied deforestation reaches 10 % of the global deforestation consumption as a result of its dependency on imports of products such as palm oil, meat, soy, cocoa, maize, timber and rubber;
Amendment 37 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 e (new)
Paragraph 2 e (new)
2e. Calls for the establishment of an objective of Union zero deforestation consumption in the framework of the Green Deal by 2030, at the latest;
Amendment 41 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 g (new)
Paragraph 2 g (new)
2g. Considers it essential to put in place a deforestation-free certification system that would increase the supply chain transparency in the Union and allow the promotion of products not issued from deforestation;
Amendment 81 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the Union to cutreduce its dependency on imports of forest and ecosystem-risk commodities by implementing the Union protein plan, and for Union livestock production to match available Union land resources;
Amendment 90 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Strongly supports the promotion of nitrogen fixing crops under the new CAP strategic plans through eco-schemes, rural development agro-environmental measures, new sectorial interventions and coupled support, in order to increase the protein self-sufficiency of the Union, and, at the same time, contribute to reach the objectives of the biodiversity and the farm to fork strategies;
Amendment 93 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Supports the elimination by 2030 of the use of raw materials contributing to the deforestation in the production of biofuels;
Amendment 106 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the unsustainable level of consumption in the EU, and that, for example, the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) coStresses that the sustainability of raw material use in the Union could be considerably improved by implementains insufficient sustainability criteria, which both causes and intensifies land-use changeg measures to boost the circular bio- economy, consequently reducing the dependency on deforestation-risk imports;
Amendment 121 #
2020/2006(INL)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Asks the Commission to monitor and take action on the causes of wildfires, forest damage and ecosystem conversion and related human rights and tenure violations, by creating early alert mechanisms.and to assist in tackling these issues by intensifying dialogue and data sharing with respective third countries;
Amendment 225 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In full respect of Article 153(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, this Directive neither aims to harmonise the level of minimum wages across the Union nor to establish an uniform mechanism for setting minimum wages. It does not interfere with the freedom of Member States to set statutory minimum wages or promote access to minimum wage protection provided by collective agreements, according to the traditions and specificities of each country and in full respect of national competences and social partners’ contractual freedom. This Directive does not impose an obligation on the Member States where minimum wage protection is ensured exclusively via collective agreements to introduce a statutory minimum wage nor to make the collective agreements universally applicable. Also, this Directive does not establish the level of pay, which falls within the contractual freedom of the social partners at national level and within the relevant competence of Member States. The purpose of this Directive is not to impose any obligation for Member States to take measures demanding the introduction of statutory minimum wages or measures implying that the social partners have an equivalent obligation. This Directive does not oblige Member States to grant access to minimum wage protection to all workers. Such an obligation would directly interfere with Article 153(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Nothing in this Directive should be construed as creating rights for individuals.
Amendment 372 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) This Directive lays down minimum requirements, thus leaving untouched Member States' prerogative to introduce and maintain more favourable provisions. Rights acquired under the existing national legal framework in Sweden and Denmark should continue to apply, unless more favourable provisions are introduced by in accordance to the derogation in Article 1(3) and Article 16(2) of this Directive. The implementation of this Directive cannot be used to reduce existing rights for workers, nor can it constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection afforded to workers in the field covered by this Directive.
Amendment 389 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. With a view to improving working and living conditions in the Union, this Directive establishes a framework for the promotion of:
Amendment 409 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) access of workers to minimum wage protection, in the form of wages set out byby promoting access to collective agreementsbargaining or in the form of a statutory minimum wage in Member States where it exists.
Amendment 421 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Nothing in this Directive shall be construed as imposing an obligation on the Member States where wage setting is ensured exclusivemainly via collective agreements to introduce a statutory minimum wage nor to make the collective agreements universally applicable or affect the contractual freedom of the social partners to negotiate, monitor and set wages through collective agreements. This Directive does not oblige Member States to grant access to minimum wage protection to all workers, nor shall it create any obligation on the Member States as regards the level or conditions for the setting of wages.
Amendment 573 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The national criteria referred to in paragraph 1 shall include at least the following elementwhose relevance and relative weight shall be decided by Member States in accordance with their prevailing national socio-economic conditions:
Amendment 863 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that, without prejudice to specific forms of redress and dispute resolution provided for, where applicable, in collective agreements, workers, including those whose employment relationship has ended, have access to effective and impartial dispute resolution and a right to redress, including adequate compensation, in the case of infringements of their rightsexisting national law or collective agreements provide for relating to statutory minimum wages or minimum wage protection provided by collective agreements and such rights have been infringed.
Amendment 880 #
2020/0310(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the measures necessary to protect workers, including those who are workers’ representatives, from any adverse treatment by the employer and from any adverse consequences resulting from a complaint lodged with the employer or resulting from any proceedings initiated with the aim of enforcing compliance with the rights relating to statutory minimum wages or minimum wage protection provided by collective agreements.provided for in existing national law or collective agreements relating to minimum wage protection
Amendment 17 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) In practice, DLT refers to the protocols and supporting infrastructure that enable nodes in a network to propose, validate, and record state changes(or updates) consistently across the network’s nodes – without the need to rely on a central trusted party to obtain reliable data. DLT is built upon public-key cryptography, a cryptographic system that uses pairs of keys: public keys, which are publicly known and essential for identification, and private keys, which are kept secret and are used for authentication and encryption.
Amendment 22 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) A crypto-asset can be seen as an asset that depends primarily on cryptography and DLT or similar technology as part of its perceived or inherent value, that is neither issued nor guaranteed by a central bank or public authority, and that can be used as a means of exchange and/or for investment purposes.
Amendment 71 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) In order to ensure consumer protection, prospective purchasers of crypto-assets should be informed about the characteristics, functions and risks of crypto-assets they intend to purchase. When making a public offer of crypto- assets in the Union or when seeking admission of crypto-assets to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets, issuers of crypto-assets should produce, notify to their competent authority and publish an information document (‘a crypto-asset white paper’) containing mandatory disclosures. Such crypto-asset white paper should contain general information on the issuer and offeror, when different, on the project to be carried out with the capital raised, on the public offer of crypto-assets or on their admission to trading on a trading platform for crypto- assets, on the rights and obligations attached to the crypto-assets, on the underlying technology used for such assets and on the related risks. To ensure fair and non- discriminatory treatment of holders of crypto-assets, the information in the crypto-asset white paper, and where applicable in any marketing communications related to the public offer, shall be fair, clear and not misleading.
Amendment 115 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
Recital 41
(41) To ensure that asset-referenced tokens are mainly used as a means of exchange and not as a store of value, issuers of asset-referenced tokens, and any crypto-asset service providers, should not grant interests to users of asset- referenced tokens for time such users are holding those asset-referenced tokens. Some asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens should be considered significant due to the potential large customer base of their promoters and shareholders, their potential high market capitalisation, the potential size of the reserve of assets backing the value of such asset-referenced tokens or e- money tokens, the potential high number of transactions, the potential interconnectedness with the financial system or the potential cross- border use of such crypto-assets. Significant asset- referenced tokens or significant e-money tokens, that could be used by a large number of holders and which could raise specific challenges in terms of financial stability, monetary policy transmission or monetary sovereignty, should be subject to more stringent requirements than other asset- referenced tokens or e-money tokens.
Amendment 118 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
Recital 46
Amendment 119 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) The crypto-asset white paper produced by an issuer or offeror of e- money tokens should contain all the relevant information concerning that issuer, when known, the offeror and the offer of e- money tokens or their admission to trading on a trading platform for crypto- assets that is necessary to enable potential buyers to make an informed purchase decision and understand the risks relating to the offer of e-money tokens. The crypto- asset white paper should also explicitly indicate that holders of e-money tokens are provided with a claim in the form of a right to redeem their e-money tokens against fiat currency at par value and at any moment.
Amendment 151 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point a
Article 1 – point a
(a) transparency and disclosure requirements for the issuance, offering and admission to trading on a trading platform of crypto-assets;
Amendment 152 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point b
Article 1 – point b
(b) the authorisation and supervision of crypto-asset service providers and issuers ofand offerors of both asset-referenced tokens and issuers of electronic money tokens;
Amendment 155 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 –point c
Article 1 –point c
(c) the operation, organisation and governance of issuers and offerors of asset-referenced tokens, issuers and offerors of electronic money tokens and crypto-asset service providers;
Amendment 158 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation applies to persons that are engaged in the issuance or offering of crypto- assets for the purpose of trading or provideing services related to crypto- assets trading in the Union.
Amendment 163 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) 'hybrid tokens', which combine elements of financial instruments as defined in paragraph 2(a) of this article, with elements of crypto-assets, thereby creating a hybrid 'financial crypto-asset';
Amendment 164 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Amendment 165 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b b (new)
(bb) funds, other than e-money tokens, included in a payments account as defined in Article 4 (12) of Directive 2015/2366/EU;
Amendment 179 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the provisions of chapter I of Title III, except Articles 21 and 22 and the information specified in Article 16(2)(c)- (o).;
Amendment 183 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5
Article 2 – paragraph 5
5. Where providing one or more crypto-asset services, credit institutions authorised under Directive 2013/36/EU shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter I of Title V, except the information specified in Article 54.2(d-r), Articles 57 and 58.
Amendment 184 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 187 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Investment firms authorised under Directive 2014/65/EU shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter I of Title V, except the information specified in Article 54.2(d-r), Articles 57, 58, 60 and 61, where they only provide one or several crypto- asset services equivalent to the investment services and activities for which they are authorised under Directive 2014/65/EU. For that purpose:
Amendment 192 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘distributed ledger technology’ or ‘DLT’ means a type of technology that support the distributed recording of encrypted data;
Amendment 195 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘crypto-asset’ means a digital representation of value or rights for direct investment or finance purposes that use cryptography for security and are coins or tokens of distributed ledgers, and which may be transferred and stored electronically, using distributed ledger technology or similar technology;
Amendment 204 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘electronic money token’ or ‘e- money token’ means a type of crypto-asset the main purpose of which is to be used as a means of exchange and that purports to maintain a stable value by referring to the value of a fiat currency that is legal tendermaintaining a portfolio which ensures that the token maintains the value of a fiat currency that is legal tender; e-money tokens which maintain the value of a fiat currency of the Union shall be deemed to be electronic money as defined in Article 2 (2) of Directive 2009/110/EC;
Amendment 210 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘utility token’ means a type of crypto-asset that is used for purposes other than as a means of payment or exchange for external goods or services and which is intended to provide digital access to a good or service, available on DLT, and is only accepted by the issuer of that token;
Amendment 212 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5a) 'financial market infrastructures' (FMIs) means payment systems, central securities depositories, securities settlement systems, central counterparties and trade repositories;
Amendment 216 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘issuer of crypto-assets’ means a legal personnatural person , a legal person or other entity being subject of rights and obligations, who offers to the public any type of crypto-assets or seeks the admission of such crypto-assets to a trading platform for crypto-assets;
Amendment 221 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) an 'offeror of crypto-assets' means a legal entity which offers any type of crypto-assets or asks for admission to trading of crypto-assets on a trading platform for crypto-assets;
Amendment 232 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
(7a) "funds" means funds as defined in Article 4, point (25), of Directive (EU) 2015/2366;
Amendment 268 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. No issuer or offeror of crypto- assets, other than asset-referenced tokens or e-money tokens, shall, in the Union, offer such crypto-assets to the public, or seek an admission of such crypto-assets to trading on a trading platform for crypto- assets, unless that issuer or offeror:
Amendment 269 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) is a legal entity, a natural person having its residence in the Union, or other entity established or having seat in the Union and subject to the rights and obligations of the Union;
Amendment 284 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the crypto-assets are offered to fewer than 1500 natural or legal persons per Member State where such persons are acting on their own account;
Amendment 287 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) over a period of 12 months, the total consideration of an offer to the public of crypto-assets in the Union does not exceed EUR 18 000 000, or the equivalent amount in another currency or in crypto- assets;
Amendment 295 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of point (a), crypto-assets shall not be considered to be offered for free where purchasers are required to provide or to undertake to provide personal data to the issuer or offeror in exchange for those crypto-assets, or where the issuer or offeror of those crypto-assets receives from the prospective holders of those crypto-assets any third party fees, commissions, monetary benefits or non- monetary benefits in exchange for those crypto-assets.
Amendment 296 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Where utility tokens in operation are offered to third parties for the sole purpose of ensuring access to the relevant good or service, they may be offered directly by issuers or offerors to third parties.
Amendment 309 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) a detailed description of the issuer and offeror, when different, and a presentation of the main participants involved in the project's design and development;
Amendment 321 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) a detailed description of the rights and obligations attached to the crypto- assets and the procedures and conditions forby which the issuer, offeror and the consumer may exercisinge those rights;
Amendment 492 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) EUR 35200 000;
Amendment 601 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36
Article 36
Amendment 672 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
An e-money token offered to the public in the Union or admitted to trading on a trading platform of crypto-assets may reference a fiat currency of legal tender other than a currency of the Union.
Amendment 676 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) if the average outstanding amount of e-money tokens does not exceed EUR 5 000 000, or the corresponding equivalent in another fiat currency, over a period of 12 months, calculated at the end of each calendar day.
Amendment 677 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 702 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45
Article 45
Amendment 706 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) a description of the issuer(s) of e- money tokens, when known;
Amendment 708 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) a description of the offeror of e- money tokens;
Amendment 709 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a detailed description of the issuer’s project, and a presentation of the main participants involved in the project's design and development, when known;
Amendment 712 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) the risks relating to the issuer of(s) of the e- money issuertokens, the offeror of the e- money tokens, the e-money tokens and the implementation of the project, including the technology;
Amendment 734 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 2
Article 50 – paragraph 2
2. Competent authorities of the issuer’ or offeror's home Member State shall provide the EBA with information on the criteria referred to in Article 39(1) of this Article and specified in accordance with Article 39(6) on at least a yearly basis.
Amendment 737 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 3
Article 50 – paragraph 3
3. Where the EBA is of the opinion that e-money tokens meet the criteria referred to in Article 39(1), as specified in accordance with Article 39(6), the EBA shall prepare a draft decision to that effect and notify that draft decision to the issuers or offerors of those e-money tokens and the competent authority of the issuer’ or offeror's home Member State. The EBA shall give issuers or offerors of such e- money tokens and their competent authorities the opportunity to provide observations and comments in writing prior the adoption of its final decision. The EBA shall duly consider those observations and comments.
Amendment 741 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 4
Article 50 – paragraph 4
4. The EBA shall take its final decision on whether an e-money token is a significant e-money token within three months after the notification referred to in paragraph 3 and immediately notify the issuers or offerors of such e-money tokens and their competent authorities thereof.
Amendment 924 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 8
Article 68 – paragraph 8
8. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised for the operation of a trading platform for crypto-assets shall complete the final settlement of a crypto-asset transaction on the DLT on the same date aswithin 72hrs of the transactions has been being executed on the trading platform.
Amendment 933 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 10 a (new)
Article 68 – paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised as offerors for the operation of a trading platform and of certain crypto-assets, shall ensure compliance with publication and audit requirements as laid down in this Regulation by having a dedicated page on their website and/or app on the crypto- assets that they offer.
Amendment 934 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 69 – paragraph 3
Article 69 – paragraph 3
3. Crypto-asset service providers that are authorised for exchanging crypto-assets against fiat currency or other crypto-assets shall, if no fixed price has been agreed, execute the clients' orders at the average prices displayed atbetween the time of their receipt and the time of the execution of the order.
Amendment 971 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1
Article 77 – paragraph 1
1. Issuers and offerors of crypto- assets shall inform the public as soon as possible of inside information which concerns them, in a manner that enables the public to access that information in an easy manner and to assess that information in a complete, correct and timely manner.
Amendment 978 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Issuers and offerors of crypto- assets may, on their own responsibility, delay disclosure to the public of inside information provided that all of the following conditions are met:
Amendment 981 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) immediate disclosure is likely to prejudice the legitimate interests of the issuers or offerors;
Amendment 989 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 77 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the issuers or offerors are able to ensure the confidentiality of that information.
Amendment 1127 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 122 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 122 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) an assessment of whether the scope of crypto-asset services covered by this Regulation is appropriate and whether any adjustment to the definitions set out in this Regulation is needed, and whether any additional innovative crypto-asset forms would need to be added to this regulation;
Amendment 1144 #
2020/0265(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 123 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 123 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. By way of derogation from this Regulation, crypto-assets that are issued or made available and/or traded in the EU or admitted to trading on a trading platform for crypto-assets on or after [please insert the date of entry into application of this Regulation] in accordance with the laws applicable to such crypto assets prior to the date of application of this Regulation, may continue to do so until [please insert date 18 months after the date of application of this Regulation].
Amendment 134 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The transition to climate neutrality requires changes across the entire policy spectrum and a collective effort of all sectors of the economy and society, as illustrated by the Commission in its Communication ‘The European Green Deal’. The European Council, in its Conclusions of 12 December 2019, stated that all relevant Union legislation and policies need to be consistent with, and contribute to, the fulfilment of the climate- neutrality objective while respecting a level playing field, and invited the Commission to examine whether this requires an adjustment of the existing rules. Union policies should be designed to minimise the risk of carbon leakage across all sectors.
Amendment 273 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) the benefits of active and sustainable forest management and afforestation;
Amendment 312 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new)
(fa) the prevention of possible carbon leakage;
Amendment 350 #
2020/0036(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall develop a set of indicators to assess the resilience of society, environment and economy to climate change. The European Environment Agency shall assist the Commission in development of these indicators in accordance with its annual work plan.
Amendment 69 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy constitutes one of the most important policy objectives for the Union. On 12 December 2019, the European Council endorsed the objective of achieving a climate-neutral Union by 2050, in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. While fighting climate change and environmental degradation will benefit all in the long term and provides opportunities and challenges for all in the medium term, not all regions and Member States start their transition from the same point or have the same capacity to respond. Some are more advanced than others, whereas the transition entails a wider social and economic impact for those regions that rely heavily on fossil fuels -, especially coal, lignite, peat and oil shale - or, greenhouse gas intensive industries or industries whose products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. Such a situation not only creates the risk of a variable speed transition in the Union as regards climate action, but also of growing disparities between regions, detrimental to the objectives of social, economic and territorial cohesion.
Amendment 76 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In order to be successful, the transition has to be fair and socially acceptable for all. Therefore, both the Union and the Member States must take into account its economic and social implications from the outset, and deploy all possible instruments to mitigate adverse consequences. The aim of the controlled and just transition is avoiding economic downturns in the most exposed regions while not undermining the prospects for economic development in these regions. The Union budget has an important role in that regard.
Amendment 101 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In view of the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement, the commitment regarding the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the increased ambition of the Union as proposed in the European Green Deal, the JTF should provide a key contribution to mainstream climate actions. Resources from the JTF own envelope are additional and come on top of the investments needed to achieve the overall target of 25% of the Union budget expenditure contributing to climate objectives. Resources transferredVoluntary transfers of resources decided by each Member State from the ERDF and ESF+ will contribute fully tomplement the achievement of this target.
Amendment 113 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The resources from the JTF should complement the resources available under cohesion policy instruments and all other relevant EU and national funding instruments targeting vulnerable sectors, and should not lead to cuts or compulsory transfers from EU funds covered by Regulation.../…[new CPR].
Amendment 126 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) This Regulation identifies types of investments for which expenditure may be supported by the JTF. All supported activities should be pursued in full respect of the climate and environmental priorities of the Union. The list of investments should include those that support local economies and are sustainable in the long- term, taking into account all the objectives of the Green Deal. The projects financed should contribute to a transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy, above all, mitigate negative economic and societal impacts of environmental transition and contribute to a transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy. Investments in transitional energy sources such as natural gas shall be eligible for support if such investments lead to a substantial reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and allow for the use of renewable gas as a sustainable alternative. For declining sectors, such as energy production based on coal, lignite, peat and oil shale or extraction activities for these solid fossil fuels, support should be linked to the phasing out of the activity and the corresponding reduction in the employment level. As regards transforming sectors with high greenhouse gas emission levels, support should promote new activities through the deployment of new technologies, new processes or products, leading to significant emission reduction, in line with the EU 2030 climate objectives and EU climate neutrality by 205013 while maintaining and enhancing employment and avoiding environmental degradation. Particular attention should also be given to activities enhancing innovation and research in advanced and sustainable technologies, as well as in the fields of digitalisation and connectivity, provided that such measures help mitigate the negative side effects of a transition towards, and contribute to, a climate- neutral and circular economy. It is also necessary to provide support for industrial factories and industrial parks in their efforts to adapt their spaces to new sustainable activities. __________________ 13 As set out in “A Clean Planet for all European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy”, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank - COM(2018) 773 final.
Amendment 146 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to enhance the economic diversification of territories impacted by the transition, the JTF should provide support to productive investment in SMEs in order to help them re-orient their business activities and create new opportunities. Productive investment should be understood as investment in fixed capital or immaterial assets of enterprises in view of producing goods and services thereby contributing to gross- capital formation, scaling up and employment. For enterprises other than SMEs, productive investments should only be supported if they are necessary for mitigating job losses resulting from the transition, by creating or protecting a significant number of jobs and they do not lead to or result from relocation. Investments in existing industrial facilities, including those covered by the Union Emissions Trading System, should be allowed if they contribute to the transition to a climate-neutral economy by 2050 and go substantially below the relevant benchmarks established for free allocation under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council14 and if they result in the protection of a significant number of jobs. Any such investment should be justified accordingly in the relevant territorial just transition plan. In order to protect the integrity of the internal market and cohesion policy, support to undertakings should comply with Union State aid rules as set out in Articles 107 and 108 TFEU and, in particular, support to productive investments by enterprises other than SMEs should be limited to enterprises located in areas designated as assisted areas for the purposes of points (a) and (c) of Article 107(3) TFEU. __________________ 14Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ L 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32).
Amendment 158 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to provide flexibility for the programming of the JTF resources under the Investment for jobs and growth goal, it should be possible to prepare a self- standing JTF programme or to programme JTF resources in one or more dedicated priorities within a programme supported by the European Regional Development Fund (‘ERDF’), the European Social Fund Plus (‘ESF+’) or the Cohesion Fund. In accordance with Article 21a of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], JTF resources shcould be reinforced with complementarythe voluntary transfer of funding from the ERDF and the ESF+. The respective amounts transferred from the ERDF and the ESF+ should be consistent with the type of operations set out in the territorial just transition plans.
Amendment 165 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The JTF support should be conditional on the effective implementation of a transition process in a specific territory in order to achieve a climate-neutral economy. In that regard, Member States should prepare, in cooperation with the relevant stakeholders as defined by the partnership principle in Article 6 of EU Regulation.../…[new CPR] and supported by the Commission, territorial just transition plans, detailing the transition process, consistently with their National Energy and Climate Plans. To this end, the Commission should set up a Just Transition Platform, which would build on the existing platform for coal regions in transition to enable bilateral and multilateral exchanges of experience on lessons learnt and best practices across all affected sectors.
Amendment 171 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) The territorial just transition plans should identify the territories most negatively affected, where JTF support should be concentrated and describe specific actions to be undertaken to reach a climate-neutral economy by 2050, notably as regards the modernisation, conversion or closure of facilities involving fossil fuel production or other greenhouse gas intensive activities or activities where the products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality. Those territories should be precisely defined and correspond to NUTS level 3 regions or should be parts thereof. The plans should detail the challenges and needs of those territories and identify the type of operations needed in a manner that ensures the coherent development of climate-resilient economic activities that are also consistent with the transition to climate-neutrality and the objectives of the Green Deal. Only investments in accordance with the transition plans should receive financial support from the JTF. The territorial just transition plans should be part of the programmes (supported by the ERDF, the ESF+, the Cohesion Fund or the JTF, as the case may be) which are approved by the Commission.
Amendment 189 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the Just Transition Fund (‘JTF’) to provide support to territories or economic activities facing serious socio-economic challenges deriving from the transition process towards a climate-neutral economy of the Union by 2050.
Amendment 198 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article [4(1)] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR], the JTF shall contribute to the single specific objective ‘enabling regions, economic operators and people to address the social, economic and environmental impacts of the transition towards a climate- neutral economy’.
Amendment 212 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The resources for the JTF under the Investment for jobs and growth goal available for budgetary commitment for the period 2021-2027 shall be EUR 7.540 billion in 2018 prices, whichand shall not result from the transfer of resources from other EU funds covered by EU Regulation.../…[new CPR]. It may be increased, as the case may be, by additional resources allocated in the Union budget, and by other resources in accordance with the applicable basic act.
Amendment 242 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) productive investments in SMEs, including micro-enterprises and start-ups, leading to economic diversification and, reconversion and scale up;
Amendment 270 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) investment in district heating;
Amendment 272 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) ensuring the security of energy supply;
Amendment 273 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d c (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d c (new)
(dc) investments related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of gas, provided that it is used as a bridging technology replacing coal, lignite, peat, oil shale and demonstrates it delivers significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions; these investments should allow for the use of renewable gas at a later stage;
Amendment 277 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) investments in the deployment of technology and infrastructure for affordable clean and smart mobility contributing to greenhouse gas emission reduction and to the diversification of mobility solutions;
Amendment 281 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) investments in regeneration and decontamination of sites and brown fields, land restoration and repurposing projects including investments in the preparation of their support and background documentation and analysis;
Amendment 343 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) investment related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels with the exception of investments as defined by Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph1, point dc (new);
Amendment 359 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The JTF resources shall be programmed for the categories of regions where the territories or economic activities concerned are located, on the basis of the territorial just transition plans established in accordance with Article 7 and approved by the Commission as part of a programme or a programme amendment. The resources programmed shall take the form of one or more specific programmes or of one or more priorities within a programme.
Amendment 363 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall only approve a programme where the identification of the territories or economic activities most negatively affected by the transition process, contained within the relevant territorial just transition plan, is duly justified and the relevant territorial just transition plan is consistent with the National Energy and Climate Plan of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 372 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The JTF priority or priorities shall comprise the JTF resources consisting of all or part of the JTF allocation for the Member States and the resources voluntarily transferred in accordance with Article [21a] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR]. The total of the ERDF and ESF+ resources transferred to the JTF priority shall be at least equal to one and a halfup to three times the amount of support from the JTF to that priority but shall not exceed three times that amount.
Amendment 388 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) a justification for identifying the territories or economic activities as most negatively affected by the transition process referred to in point (a) and to be supported by the JTF, in accordance with paragraph 1;
Amendment 390 #
2020/0006(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) an assessment of the transition challenges faced by the most negatively affected territories or economic activities, including the social, economic, and environmental impact of the transition to a climate-neutral economy, identifying the potential number of affected jobs and job losses, the development needs and objectives, to be reached by 2030 linked to the transformation or closure of greenhouse gas-intensive activities or activities where their products are impacted by the transition to EU climate neutrality in those territories;
Amendment 56 #
2019/2157(INI)
Ca. whereas climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in forests are interlinked where aspects must be balanced and synergies between them encouraged especially within Member States Adaptation Strategies and Plans;
Amendment 127 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes afforestation and reforestation as suitable tools in enhancing forest cover especially in abandoned lands, close to urban and peri- urban areas as well as in mountainous areas; highlights the importance of protective functions of forests as well as active and sustainable forest management in these areas to enhance health and resilience of the ecosystems; stresses the importance of adapting the species composition to regional and climatic conditions;
Amendment 130 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Concludes that the differences between Member States, including the differences between regions within Member States has been an important factor when considering measures on an EU-level;
Amendment 131 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Commends the forest-related research and innovation already undertaken, especially under the Horizon 2020 and LIFE+ programmes; applauds those cases where the results contribute to the development of the sustainable bioeconomy, seeking a balance between different aspects of sustainable forest management and underlining multifunctional role of forests;
Amendment 145 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the EU’s forests are multifunctional and characterised by great diversity, including differences in ownership patterns, size, structure, biodiversity, resilience and challenges; points out, in addition, that forests offer society a wide variety of ecosystem services including raw materials, improved air quality, clean water, erosion control, and protection from droughts, floods and avalanches and recreational and cultural benefits;
Amendment 162 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Amendment 177 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses the need to reconsider ambitious goals of the European Green Deal for 2030, especially to increase the EU’s GHG emission reduction target, and thoroughly assess its economic impacts on the competitiveness of forestry sector and foresters in the EU, in the context of current global pandemic of COVID-19;
Amendment 205 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Highlights the suitability and viability of the two-step approach to verify sustainability of forest biomass, as agreed in the recast of Renewable Energy Directive; notes that this should be achieved by continuing the halted development of non-end use specific sustainability criteria by the Standing Forestry Committee and the Commission;
Amendment 214 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Subheading 3
The future – the crucial role played by the post-2020 EU Forest Strategy and the European Green Deal in meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement and the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
Amendment 229 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Commission’s 2020 Work Programme and especially the acknowledgment of the new EU Forest Strategy’s contribution to the 26th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP26) of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change; stresses, in this regard, that in future, forests should not be considered as the only type of CO2 sink as that would give other sectors less of an incentive to minimise their emissions; highlights, in addition, the need to promote adaptation of forest to climate change and the importance of transitioning from a fossil-based society;
Amendment 238 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises the crucial role of forests, the forest-based sector and the bioeconomy in achieving the goals of the European Green Deal; stresses that achieving the EU’s environmental and climate goals will never be possible without multifunctional, healthy and sustainably managed forests applying a long-term perspective and viable industries; encourages, in addition, actions to increase forest cover; encourages the Commission to explore different options both within current measures or new ones in order to encourage incentivising forest owners to apply, within the concept of SFM, management methods ensuring long term climate benefits;
Amendment 256 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Recalls that about 60% of EU forests are privately owned and that about two-thirds of private forest owners own less than 3 ha of forest; stresses that all measures must duly take this into account and hence must be designed in a way that are accessible to and can be practically implemented by small-scale forest owners; recalls that the Commission has identified administrative burden and forest ownership structure as limiting factors for the uptake of certain measures1a; _________________ 1a COM(2018) 811 final, p.3
Amendment 260 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12c. Stresses that acknowledging and safeguarding property rights is key to achieve a long-term commitment to sustainable forest management;
Amendment 267 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that an ambitious, independent and self-standing EU Forest Strategy is needed for the post-2020 period which is not subordinate to any other sectoral strategy; calls for a new EU Forest Strategy that builds on the holistic approach to SFM, taking into account all of the economic, social and environmental aspects of the forest-based value chain; stresses that a coordinated and coherent approach to forests, the forest-based sector, including the people directly or indirectly work and live in the forest and the forestry sector, and the multiple services they provide needs to be developed, given the growing number of national and EU policies directly or indirectly affecting forests and their management in the EU;
Amendment 278 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Takes the view that the EU Forest Strategy should act as a bridge between national forest policies and EU objectives relating to forests, recognising both the need to respect national competence and the need to contribute to wider EU objectives; calls to strengthen the role of the Standing Forestry Committee (SFC) in order to ensure the coordination among relevant stakeholders and policies at the EU level;
Amendment 280 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Takes the view that the EU Forest Strategy should act as a bridge between national forest policies and EU objectives relating to forests, recognising both the need to respect national competence and, the need to contribute to wider EU objectives and to ensure long term stability and predictability for sustainable forest management, the forestry sector and the whole bioeconomy;
Amendment 298 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the importance of evidence-based decision-making with regard to EU policies relating to forests, the forest-based sector and its value-chain; calls for all forest-related aspects of European Green Deal measures to be consistent with the post-2020 EU Forest Strategy, particularly with a view to ensuring that SFM has a positive impact on society, including ensuring long term and stable benefit for the climate and the environment;
Amendment 304 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the need to take into consideration the links between the forest- based sector and other sectors as well as the importance of digitalisation and investing in research and innovation; stresses the crucial role of wood-based materials in substituting fossil-based alternatives in industries such as the construction industry, the textile industry, the chemical industry and the packaging industry; encourages European Commission to explore different market- based mechanisms to incentivise a substitution from fossil to renewable raw materials such as wood in constructions, which offer climate benefits;
Amendment 307 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Highlights the need to take into consideration the links between the forest- based sector and other sectors as well as the importance of digitalisation and investing in research and innovation; stresses the crucial role of wood-based materials in substituting fossil-based alternatives in industries such as the construction industry, the textile industry, the chemical industry and the packaging industry and the need to fully take into account the climate and environmental benefits of this material substitution;
Amendment 315 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Reiterates the need of fostering environmental, economic and social aspects of forests and forest management in a balanced manner while strengthening the overall climate benefits stemming from forests and the forest-based value chain, namely fostered CO2- sequestration, carbon storage and substitution of fossil-based raw materials and energy; highlights the urgent need to strengthen research efforts as regards especially substitution effects;
Amendment 321 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses the importance of developing and ensure a market based bioeconomy in the EU incentivising innovations and development of new bio based products with an effective supply chain making effective use of the biomass materials;
Amendment 325 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that due to climate change, natural disturbances such as droughts, floods, storms, pest infestations, erosion and fires will occur more frequently and intensely, causing damage to forests in the EU; emphasises, in this context, the need to better prevent such events by making forests more resilient, for example, by strengthening the implementation of sustainable and active forest management, through research and innovation and by offering better support mechanisms for affected areas and properties so they can be restored; highlighting the need for concrete and effective actions in climate adaptation strategies and plans, incorporating the synergies between mitigation and adaptation;
Amendment 335 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that due to climate change, natural disturbances such as droughts, floods, storms, pest infestations, erosion and fires will occur more frequently, causing damage to forests in the EU; emphasises, in this context, the need to betterdevelop risk management tools to prepare for and prevent such events by making forests more resilient, for example through research and innovation and by offering better support mechanisms for affected areas and properties so they can be restored;
Amendment 350 #
2019/2157(INI)
18. Recognises the role of biodiversity in ensuring that forest ecosystems remain healthy and resilient; highlights the importance of the Natura 2000 sites; notes, however, that sufficient financial resources are needed to manage such areas; highlights the importance of pragmatic integration of nature conservation into sustainable forest management without enlargement of protected areas and additional administrative and financial burden, supports the establishment of networks created on the basis of Member States driven initiatives to this end.
Amendment 357 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recognises the role of biodiversity in ensuring that forest ecosystems remain healthy and resilient; highlights the importance of the Natura 2000 sites; notes, however, that sufficient financial resources are needed to manage such areas; stresses that economic losses caused by protection measures should be fairly compensated;
Amendment 368 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to support the negotiations conducted by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and supported by the Food and Agriculture Organisation, with a view to reaching a legally binding pan-European agreement on forests without Russian Federation, which withdrew from the negotiating process;
Amendment 370 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. EHighlights that a growing number of EU policies address forests from different directions; encourages the completion of the ongoing process to develop a non-end-use- driven sustainability approach with the close involvement of the Standing Forestry Committee and the Member States, building on the two-step approach of the recast Renewable Energy Directive; believes that the two-step approach could be used in other policies aiming to improvensure the sustainability of forestry-biomass and the cross-sectorial coherence of EU policies;
Amendment 380 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the crucial importance of the CAP and forestry measures in implementing the EU Forest Strategy; encourages the continuity of forestry measures under the 2021-2027 CAP; highlights the need for other easily accessible, well-coordinated and relevant EU funding mechanisms; emphasises the need for reduction of administrative burden in the EU forestry measures and in state aid generally, for example by allowing block exemptions in order to react promptly to challenges for forests;
Amendment 400 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Highlights the importance of strengthened cooperation between Member States in order to enhance the benefits of the new forest strategy;
Amendment 422 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Stresses the need for improved communication regarding the importance of the sustainable management of forest areas, together with the possibility of extending, implementing and coordinating information campaigns on the multifunctional nature of forests and the many economic, social and environmental benefits provided by forest management at all relevant levels of the EU;
Amendment 424 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Takes note of the Commission’s recommendation that a strong capitalisation of innovation along the value chain would help to support the forest-based sector’s competitiveness1a; welcomes in this regard the EIB’s commitment to allocate 50 % of its funding to climate related projects and underlines the opportunities for the forest-based sector, which plays an important role in the substitution of fossil- based materials and energies; _________________ 1a COM(2018) 811 final, p.7
Amendment 430 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Highlights the fact that global deforestation and forest degradation are serious problems; points out that policy initiatives should be developed to tackle issues outside the EU, with a focus on the tropics and the drivers of unsustainable practices in forests from outside the sector; stresses the need to foster the implementation of the EU Timber Regulation and the FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade) action plan in order to prevent the entry of illegally sourced wood into the EU market; highlights the need for the EUFS to comprehensively include EU’s external objectives and action on promoting SFM worldwide, both bilaterally and through multilateral forest-related processes;
Amendment 457 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to continue the development an EU- wide Forest Information System for Europe under the shared responsibility of all of the relevant Commission Directorates-General and under the framework of the EU Forest Strategy; stresses the importance of science-based, balanced information with socio-economic indicators for the development of any forest-related EU policy;
Amendment 468 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission’s Standing Forestry Committee to giveUnderlines the Member States acompetence for and central role in the preparation and implementation of the post-2020 EU Forest Strategy and calls on the Commission’s Standing Forestry Committee to support Member States in this task; stresses the importance of the parallel involvement of relevant stakeholders in the Civil Dialogue Group on Forestry and Cork; urges the Commission to involve Parliament in the implementation of the EU Forest Strategy on an annual basis;
Amendment 472 #
2019/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission’s Standing Forestry Committee to give the Member States a central role in the preparation and implementation of the post-2020 EU Forest Strategy; stresses the importance of the parallel involvement of relevant stakeholders in the Civil Dialogue Group on Forestry and Cork; urges the Commission to involve Parliament in the implementation of the EU Forest Strategy and at least on an annual basis;
Amendment 8 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the Regulation establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products contains certain derogations from the application of Article 101(1) TFEU either generally for all sectors or specifically for certain agricultural sectors;
Amendment 15 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas EU farmers continue to suffer from a lack of integration into producers’ organizations making their position within the food supply chain highly vulnerable and decreasing their bargaining power;
Amendment 18 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
Recital A c (new)
A c. whereas the future CAP should focus on supporting small and family farms whilst ensuring that sustainable farming practices are being implemented; whereas such goals can only be achieved by a coherent approach across all EU policies, including competition policy;
Amendment 21 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A d (new)
Recital A d (new)
A d. whereas unforeseeable natural disasters and events are likely to make the market for agricultural products even more volatile and subject to crisis; notes, in this regard, the importance of access to exceptional measures which aim to preserve the market stability;
Amendment 23 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A e (new)
Recital A e (new)
A e. whereas the competitiveness of EU farmers highly depends on proper and fair functioning of internal market as well as clear interpretation and enforcement of state aids and competition policy rules over all agri-food chain operators;
Amendment 25 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the study on producer organisations and their activities in the olive oil, beef and veal, and arable crops sectors, which reaffirms the importance of these organisations and their associations in strengthening the position of primary producers in the food chain; notes that the study highlighted that in these sectors there are overall five times more unrecognised producer organisations/associations of producer organisations than those formally recognised; calls, in this regard, on the Commission to raise awareness of the benefits of having producers' organizations recognized under the CMO Regulation;
Amendment 60 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the adoption of the Directive on unfair trade practices4 in the agricultural and food supply chain and calls on the Commission to monitor closely progress on transposition thereofand functioning thereof; notes that this Directive constitutes a first step towards the protection of farmers and towards addressing the imbalance of power in the EU food supply chain and as such needs to be further enhanced to keep pace with future development of unfair trading practices; _________________ 4Directive (EU) 2019/633 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain (OJ L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 59.
Amendment 92 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the public demand for more sustainable food systems needs to be addressed, and calls on the Commission to clarify the conditions under which sustainable agreements can be exempted from competition law, namely in the framework of the current review of the Horizontal Block Exemption Regulations and related guidelines; Reaffirms its view that the Commission should issue general guidelines to clarify under which conditions the private sector can come together to agree on collectively increasing sustainability in a sector without breaching competition law; considers that such guidelines are particularly relevant to the agricultural sector due to the environmental challenges it must face and the sustainability requirements it must meet;
Amendment 129 #
2019/2131(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 k (new)
Paragraph 6 k (new)
6 k. Calls on the Commission to provide transparent analysis summarizing the impact of all different forms of EU an national support in agri-food sector on the proper and fair functioning of the internal market;
Amendment 358 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013
Article 59 – paragraph 5
Article 59 – paragraph 5
(6a) in Article 59, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following: “5. At least 5 %, and in the case of Croatia 2,5 %, of the total EAFRD contribution to the rural development programme shallmay be reserved for LEADER. ” Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02013R1305-20190301)
Amendment 401 #
2019/0254(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 15 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council46 , it is important that the obligation on a payment service provider, to retain and provide information in relation to a cross-border payment transaction, should be proportionate and should only be what is necessary for Member States to fight e-commerce VAT fraud. Furthermore, the only information relating to the payer that should be retained is where the payer is located. With regard to information relating to the payee and the payment transaction itself, payment service providers should only be required to retain and transmit to tax authorities information which is necessary for tax authorities to detect possible fraudsters and to carry out VAT controls. Therefore, payment service providers should only be required to retain records on cross-border payment transactions which are likely to indicate economic activities. The introduction of a ceiling based on the number of payments received by a payee over the course of a calendar quarter would give a reliable indication that those payments were received as part of an economic activity, thereby excluding payments for non- commercial reasons. Where such a ceiling is reached, the accounting obligation of the payment service provider would be triggered. In order to ensure proportionality, and, furthermore, to ensure adherence with data protection provisions, payment service providers should be permitted to report transactions on an aggregated basis where appropriate. _________________ 46Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L119, 04.05.2016, p.1).
Amendment 19 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) Several payment service providers may be involved in one single payment from a payer to a payee. That single payment may give rise to several transfers of funds between the different payment service providers. It is necessary that all payment service providers involved in a given payment, unless a specific exclusion is applicable, have a record keeping and reporting obligation. Those records and reports should be proportionate and contain information on the payment from the initial payer to the final payee and not on the intermediate transfers of funds between the payment service providers.
Amendment 20 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 b (new)
Recital 8 b (new)
(8 b) The record keeping and reporting obligation should also arise in cases where a payment service provider receives funds or acquires payment transactions on behalf of the payee and not only where a payment service provider transfers funds or issues payments instruments for the payer.
Amendment 21 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 c (new)
Recital 8 c (new)
(8 c) Obligations stipulated in this Directive should not apply to payment service providers falling outside the scope of Directive (EU) 2015/2366. Therefore, when the payment service providers of the payee are not located in a Member State, the payer’s payment service providers should keep records and report the information on the cross-border payment. Conversely, in order for the record keeping and reporting obligation to be proportionate, when both the payer’s and the payee’s payment service providers are located in a Member State, only the payee’s payment service providers should keep records of that information. For the purposes of the record keeping and reporting obligation, a payment service provider should be considered to be located in a Member State when his BIC or unique business identifier refers to that Member State.
Amendment 26 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – introductory phrase
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – introductory phrase
2. The requirement referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply in circumstances where both of the following conditions are met:to which payment service providers are subject to under paragraph 1 shall apply where, in the course of a calendar quarter, a payment service provider provides payment services corresponding to more than 25 cross- border payments to the same payee. The cross-border payments referred to in subparagraph 1 shall be calculated by reference to the payment services provided by the payment service provider per Member State and per identifiers referred to in Article 243c(2). Where the payment service provider has information that the payee has several identifiers the calculation shall be made per payee.
Amendment 27 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 28 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 243b – paragraph 2 – point b
Amendment 31 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
3. The records referred to in paragraph 1 shall:quirement referred to in paragraph 1 shall not apply to payment services provided by the payment service providers of the payer as regards each payment where at least one of the payment service providers of the payee is located in a Member State according to the BIC or any other business identifier code that unambiguously identifies the payment service provider and its location. A payment service provider of the payer shall in any case include these payment services in the calculation referred to in paragraph 2.
Amendment 32 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 35 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 243b – paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 36 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243b – paragraph 3a (new)
Article 243b – paragraph 3a (new)
Amendment 37 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the IBAN of the payer’s payment account or any other identifier which unambiguously identifies the payer and his location;
Amendment 39 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 243c – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where none of the identifiers referred to in subparagraph (a) is applicable, the BIC or any other business identifier code that unambiguously identifies the payment service provider acting on behalf of the payer, as well as the location of that payment service provider.
Amendment 41 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – introductory phrase
1. The records kept by the payment service providers, in accordance with Article 243b, with regards to cross border payments, shall contain the following information:
Amendment 42 #
2018/0412(CNS)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2006/112/EC
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 243d – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) any executed payment refunds for payment transactions referred to in point (g), if available;