BETA

Activities of Bogdan RZOŃCA related to 2021/0240(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) 1094/2010, (EU) 1095/2010
2022/05/17
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2021/0240(COD)
Documents: PDF(224 KB) DOC(177 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Niclas HERBST', 'mepid': 197412}]

Amendments (6)

Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Support and coordinate the exchange of information between Member States and EU institutions on financial assets and transactions subject to sanctions;
2022/03/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) carry out periodic reviews to ensure that all financial supervisors have adequate resources and powers necessary for the performance of their tasks in the area of AML/CFT;deleted
2022/03/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) perform assessments of the strategies, capacities and resources of financial supervisors in the area of AML/CFT and make the results of such assessments available to all financial supervisors;deleted
2022/03/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) carry out periodic reviews to ensure that all financial supervisors have adequate resources and powers necessary for the performance of their tasks in the area of AML/CFT;deleted
2022/03/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Where an authorisation as referred to in paragraph 1 is applied for, the national judicial authority shall control that the decision of the Authority is authentic and compliant with both Union and national law, and that the coercive measures envisaged are neither arbitrary nor excessive having regard to the subject matter of the inspection. In its control of the proportionality of the coercive measures, the national judicial authority may ask the Authority for detailed explanations, in particular relating to the grounds the Authority has for suspecting that an infringement of the acts referred to in Article 1(2), first subparagraph has taken place, the seriousness of the suspected infringement and the nature of the involvement of the person subject to the coercive measures. However, the national judicial authority shall not review the necessity for the inspection or demand to be provided with the information on the Authority’s file. The lawfulness of the Authority’s decision shall be subject to review only by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
2022/03/09
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 a (new)
Article 37a The hosting and the entire network infrastructure of the system should be located within the European Union.
2022/03/09
Committee: BUDG