BETA

Activities of Irène TOLLERET related to 2019/2055(DEC)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018, Section III – Commission and executive agencies
2020/01/22
Committee: FEMM
Dossiers: 2019/2055(DEC)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(67 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Frances FITZGERALD', 'mepid': 197720}]

Amendments (5)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas the European Parliament has repeatedly asked the Commission to promote and implement the use of gender mainstreaming, gender budgeting and gender impact assessment in the relevantall Union policy areas and the Court of Auditors to incorporate a gender perspective, including gender- disaggregated data, into its reports on the implementation of the Union budget;
2019/11/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls onfor the integration of a women’s rights and gender equality perspective into all policy areas; reiterates therefore its call for the implementation of gender budgeting inat all stages of the budgetary process, including the implementation of the budget and assessment of its implementation; reiterates its demand to include in the common set of result indicators for the implementation of the EU budget also gender-specific indicators;
2019/11/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Calls for increased transparency, targeted actions and specific budget lines in order to meeting the goals of gender equality and women’s rights in EU external action, including sexual and reproductive health and rights;
2019/11/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission to employ gender budgeting through the entire budgetary procedure, the implementation of the budget and the assessment of its execution in order to promote equal access to EU funded programmes and to encourage women’s participation;
2019/11/12
Committee: FEMM
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Reminds the Commission that there is a significant difference in types of errors, for example between unintentional omissions and cases of fraud; recalls that most of the beneficiaries are small and medium-sized farms and complex regulation increases the risk of unintentional omissions, which should also be taken into account while estimating the actual error rate;
2019/12/10
Committee: AGRI