10 Amendments of Ivan DAVID related to 2017/0035(COD)
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The procedure for adopting implementing acts is subject to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. The implementing acts complement the legal acts and should be communicated by the Council to the Member States for the purposes of monitoring compliance with these principles.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The system established by Regulation (EC) No 182/2011 has, overall, proven to work well in practice and struck an appropriateshould, in principle, strike an institutional balance as regards the roles of the Commission and the other actors involved. That system should therefore continue to function unchanged except for certabe changed, in tpargeted amendments concerningticular as regards specific aspects of procedure at the level of the appeal committee. These amendments are intended to ensure wider political accountability and ownership of politically sensitive implementing acts without, however, modifying the legal and institutional responsibilities for implementing acts aincrease the involvement of the Council in politically sensitive implementing acts, in specific cases where no opinion has been delivered at the end of the ordinary scrutiny procedures forganised by Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 these acts.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) While the Commission is empowered to decide in such cases, due to the particular sensitivity of the issues at stake, Member States should also fully assume their responsibility in the decision- making process. This, however, is not the case when Member States are not able to reach a qualified majority, due to, amongst others, a significant number of abstentions or intentional non-appearances at the moment of the vote. Therefore, by virtue of the politically sensitive nature of the act which led to the blocking, the matter should be referred back to the Council for a final decision.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The Commission should have the possibility, in specific cases, to ask the CouncilWhere no opinion could be delivered at the level of the appeal committee, the Commission should be required to refer the matter to the Council for a final decision. Having regard to the right of scrutiny provided for in Article 11 of Regulation EU No 182/2011, Parliament may be asked to indicate its views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of an opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implications. The Commissiondecision taken by the Council should be binding on the Commission. The Council should also take account of anythe position expressed by the CouncilParliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadlinefor reasons of urgency, a shorter deadline should be provided for in the referral.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) TA transparency on the votes of Member State representatives at the appeal committee levelt process for appointing the Member State representatives should be increasestablished and the individual Member State representatives' votesir work should be made public.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
(1a) The first subparagraph of paragraph 4 is amended as follows: "4. ‘Where no opinion is delivered, the Commission may adopt the draft implementing act, except in the cases provided for in the second subparagraph. Where the Commission does not adopt the draft implementshall refer the matter to the appeal committee ing act, the chair may submit to the committee an amended version thereof. ((https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011R0182&from=fr))cordance with the procedures laid down in Article 6 of this Regulation.’ Or. fr
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a
3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the appeal committee, the Commission mayshould refer the matter to the Council for an opinion indicating final decision. In accordance with its right of scrutiny as provided for in Article 11 of this Regulation, Parliament may also be asked to give its views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of an opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implications. The Commissionuncil shall take account of any position expressed by the CouncilParliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral."; ((https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011R0182&from=fr))for reasons of urgency, a shorter deadline may be provided for in the referral. Or. fr