7 Amendments of Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI related to 2020/2013(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the UN and the wider international community to undertake all necessary efforts to ensure that the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in military affairs and the use of AI-enabled systems by the military stay within the strict limits set by international law and international humanitarian law (IHL); recognizes that the primary guarantor of the Euro-Atlantic security is NATO and that an international consensus related to AI regulations must be made in close cooperation with Member States, the North Atlantic Council and like-minded partners as the US, UK, Canada or Japan;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that states, parties to a conflict and individuals, when employing AI-enabled systems in warfare, must at all times adhere to their obligations under the applicable international law and remain accountable for actions resulting from the use of such systems; recalls that AI machines can under no circumstances be held accountable for intended, unintended or undesirable effects caused by AI- enabled systems on the battlefield and therefore human oversight in the application of AI-enabled systems in combat must be maintained;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that not all members of the international community will follow the regulatory human-centric approach devised by the union and that authoritarian states will devise a counter framework that will pursue, at the expense of Member States, to deliver military advantages and superiority within the AI domain;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Urges the Member States to track and assess the development of AI technologies, particularly military and surveillance, within authoritarian states that avoid compliance with EU led regulations, to avoid a scenario in which our societies, militaries and institutions fall vulnerable to hybrid warfare;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on Member States to serve as the deciding force for the basis of any agreement, using the international legal precedents in practice for CDSP, NATO and individual command structures to ascertain how best to develop any regulations for AI-enabled systems in the battlefield;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that any international legal framework for AI must take into consideration the more pressing developments taking place in quantum computing which represents the most revolutionary change in operational capability in conflict since the advent of atomic weaponry and thus urges that the advancement of quantum computing technologies and a viable legal framework for them should be apriority for the Union and Member States;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that in tactical scenarios, AI techniques such as reinforcement learning, which allows machines to share their experiences and optimal solutions among themselves have proven to be a critical asset in military campaigns, leading to the evolution of a highly optimized, robust mission intelligence that is effective at fulfilling objectives set by military command and are in compliance with existing IHL principles;