BETA

615 Amendments of Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI

Amendment 10 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
– having regard to the US's European Deterrence Initiative, which helps boost the military readiness of European allies and deter Russian aggression;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 b (new)
– having regard to U.S. having invested over $35 billion USD since 2015 through the European Deterrence Initiative in supporting American troop deployments in Europe and assist capability development and military readiness in Europe;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 c (new)
– having regard to the Transatlantic Defence Investment Cooperation (TADIC) formally commissioned in 2000 to address fragmentation of the security and defence industry within Europe and resolve the large differences of investment in defence capability, technology, export controls and technology transfer regimes among Member States;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 d (new)
– having regard to China's increase in economic and military presence in the Mediterranean and African countries;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 e (new)
– having regard to the threat of domestic and foreign terrorism, primarily from groups such as ISIS and its affiliates;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 f (new)
– having regard to new technologies such as artificial intelligence, space capabilities and quantum computing which present new opportunities for mankind, but also create new challenges in defence and foreign policy that require a clear strategy and consensus between Member States and US;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas standing together against the brutality of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine will be even more crucial in the months to come and all efforts should be made to utilize EDIRPA, ASAP and the European Peace Facility to ensure that a provision of supplies in support to Ukraine is maintained;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the multiple issues we cooperate on would benefit immensely from an even stronger parliamentary dimension between the US Congress and Senate and the European Parliament, which would enhance public awareness, democratic legitimacy, oversight and the ability to deliver on our joint endeavours;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. Acknowledges that close cooperation should also take place with third countries and through the command and planning structures of NATO; such cooperation will provide vital capabilities, such as strategic lift, essential to operations in the European periphery;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 83 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) Considers that future strategic cooperation between EU and US must include Member States providing the development, financing and operationalisation of a minimum of 50% of the capabilities required to ensure deterrence on the European continent;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) foster the EU’s open strategic autonomrational capability as a means to pursue the EU’s own legitimate interests while strengthening the transatlantic bond and increasing the joint leverage of the EU and the US on the world scene;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 118 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) reinforce the accountability and resilience of our democratic systems in the run-up to the elections next year on both sides, as well as enhance transatlantic dialogue and cooperation on policies supporting democracy, human rights and the rule of law and combating disinformation and foreign interference from authoritarian regimes; encourage further cooperation and exchanges between like-minded partners, in particular those who stand on the frontline defending democracy and freedom against authoritarian expansion.
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 156 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) pursue transatlantic cooperation in areas of shared interest, the EU should prioritize technological sophistication, streamline procurement practices and ensure interoperability while initiating a renewed call for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership that ensures stronger economic relations;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 161 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h b (new)
(hb) ensure a renewed effort to secure a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership that ensures market access and overcomes challenges to regulatory cooperation;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(ja) Encourages EU-US cooperation to cooperate with ASEAN countries in all aspects already agreed upon, further stresses the need to cooperate on economic manners and combatting terrorism;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 200 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l
(l) explore ways to create synergies and possibilities of EU-US engagement with China in multilateral frameworks on common and global challenges, such as climate change, health-related risks, respect for human rights, cyberspaceincluding religious freedom, foreign information manipulation and interference cyberspace, freedom of navigation in the Taiwan Strait, arms control, non- proliferation and emerging disruptive technologies;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 210 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(ma) Underlines the importance of achieving quantum computing capabilities and stresses the need to enhance EU-US cooperation in this area to ensure that quantum computing is first realized among partners sharing warm relations and supporting objectives;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 211 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m b (new)
(mb) Urges EU-US cooperation in regulating 5G implementation to comply with strict security standards that secures national and international information networks capable of encrypting communications;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 227 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) foster closer partnership with the US and other like-minded partners in the Indo-Pacific region; including Japan, the Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and Taiwan, in order to counter challenges that affect our shared values, interests, security and prosperity, in particular, any unilateral attempt to alter the status quo; note that China’s continued military provocations pose a threat not just to Taiwan, but to the wider Indo-Pacific, and ultimately, the established global order.
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 259 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point s a (new)
(sa) Recognizes the growing political, economic, environmental, security and strategic value of the Arctic Circle, urges EU-US cooperation to explore cooperation with the Arctic Council on all issues of common interest and to form a comprehensive strategy for the region;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 262 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point s b (new)
(sb) Takes into consideration that EU & US should enhance its situational awareness across the High North and the Arctic and create a new strategy focusing on broader deterrence and defence plans; the strategy should include plans for ensuring freedom of navigation in the High North and adjacent bodies of water, including the North Atlantic, as well as provisions for addressing aggressive moves by state actors;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 271 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point u
(u) ensure that the US remains an important partner for the EU’s energy security and welcomes US input to reduce EU’s dependency on Russian energy sources and strengthen the EU’s diversification of energy sources;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 275 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point v a (new)
(va) Urges the stepping up of joint EU- US efforts on advanced technology development, specifically AI, machine learning, nano and bio-technologies to ensure a coordinated effort in addressing climate change, green technology, carbon adjustment, sustainable finance and biodiversity;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 294 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x a (new)
(xa) Recognises the emerging threat of Hyper war and the unique requirements this will place on defence architectures and the need for a high-tech industrial base that the EU-US relationship is well placed to address;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 295 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x b (new)
(xb) Recognises that Russia’s illegal and unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine remains the most pressing security challenge requiring unified EU-US support to resolve, considers short term continued provision of weapons, munitions, fuel, medicine and other essential supplies as fundamental to the security of Member States while long term support, in collaboration with the US, for Ukraine’s EU membership as fundamental to lasting stability in Eastern Europe;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 296 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x c (new)
(xc) Considers security and peace in the Eastern neighbourhood presupposes the respect for and upholding of international law, territorial integrity and fundamental rights and freedoms; thus the EU-US partnership should do its utmost to help the associated EaP countries to regain their full sovereignty and control over their territories; whereas the EU’s clear commitment to the European perspective of the associated Eastern Partnership countries is crucial for pro-democratic reforms and societies' security, stability, and prosperity;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 297 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x d (new)
(xd) Stresses the importance of intensive consultations and strengthened cooperation between the EU and NATO with regard to escalating situations like the current Russian war of aggression against Ukraine; underlines that this cooperation should respect the security arrangements of all Member States and be based on unity and solidarity among member states and on adherence to principles related to the existing European security architecture and international law including the sovereignty and territorial integrity of neighbouring countries; calls for the transatlantic community to leverage and expand current and future efforts to counter Russia’s direct and indirect aggressions and activities directed against Ukraine, Georgia and the Republic of Moldova;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 298 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x e (new)
(xe) Notes that the EU-US Security Dialogue represents an important opportunity to maximize the added value of transatlantic relations in security and defence and should dedicate ample time and resources to improving the security environment in the EaP region; notes that a democratic, stable and pro-European Eastern Partnership is considered a threat by the Kremlin regime and is therefore under political and military pressure, especially Ukraine; recalls that the European security order cannot be discussed without the European countries; underlines that the stability of the EaP region is essential to the security of the whole European continent;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 304 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point y a (new)
(ya) Encourages further progress in the common set of proposals, particularly the ongoing interaction with the new EU Hybrid Fusion Cell and NATO’s Hybrid Analysis Cell in sharing situational awareness and analysis, tactical and operational cooperation between Operation Sea Guardian and EUNAVFOR MED Sophia and ongoing cooperation between EU’s Computer Emergency Response Team and the NATO Computer Incident Response Capability;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 311 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z a (new)
(za) Recognises the role that NATO’s Capacity Building Initiatives (CBI) play in contributing to Middle East stabilization via training missions to local security forces and the support the EU has provided by assuming civilian responsibilities in certain CBI initiatives;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 312 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z b (new)
(zb) Expresses concern that in recent years, China has substantially stepped up the development of its conventional and nuclear capabilities, creating thousands of precision warheads tied to sophisticated command and control systems, whereas China has shown reluctance to engage in talks on its potential participation in multilateral arms control instruments; Considers China’s stockpiling of an enormous and technologically advanced arsenal of ballistic missiles such as the Dong Feng-26 have advanced unhindered by the absence of any international Treaty;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 313 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z c (new)
(zc) Recognises that Member States and likeminded partners should coordinate on issues where China’s actions are contrary to Euro-Atlantic security interests; prioritization should be given to challenges in the cyber, hybrid, EDT, space, arms control and non- proliferation areas;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 314 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z d (new)
(zd) Recognises that the DPRK's ever closer alignment with Russia, proliferation of small and medium range missile technology along with their trafficking in nuclear know to likeminded rogue regimes while their nuclear weapons program is frequently used to extort political and economic concessions from the international community, requires a renewed effort from the EU-US partnership to prevent further expansion of the DPRK’s hostile behaviour;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z e (new)
(ze) Considers the Islamic Republic of Iran’s continued state sponsorship of terrorism, missile proliferation, ongoing support to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and intervention in various conflicts throughout the Middle East mandate that the EU recognise Iran as a clear and present threat to Euro- Atlantic security and support the efforts of the US and other allies to counter Iranian hostility;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 316 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z f (new)
(zf) Underlines that the growing significance of Artificial intelligence and machine learning requires enhanced EU- US cooperation and that measures should be taken to advance cooperation among US and European tech companies in order to ensure partnering on development and application;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 321 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point aa a (new)
(aaa) Underlines that EU & US must synergize their efforts to combat terrorism and radicalization and ensure that efforts made are supported by necessary resources and commensurate with the threat that it poses; Both partners should strive to improve current practices of intelligence-sharing among Member States with particular emphasis on achieving better, common situational awareness in key areas including emerging safe havens and terrorists’ use of EDTs, as well as hybrid tactics;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 322 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point aa b (new)
(aab) Encourages great EU-US collaboration in de-radicalization and counter-terrorism efforts that include establishing joint training activities, shared counter-terrorism courses, exchange programs for officers, tactical drills and education initiatives;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 323 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point aa c (new)
(aac) Encourages EU-US collaboration in establishing a specialised team of lawyers trained to prosecute terrorism cases, while judges selected to hear terrorism cases should have the background and training to preside over them;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 324 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point aa d (new)
(aad) Calls on the EU and US to collaboratively address the consistent and growing threats to the protection and preservation of cultural heritage and cultural smuggling, especially in conflict zones. Urges the embracing of a strategy that includes: robust public awareness campaigns, universal condemnation of trafficking in unprovenanced antiquities; establishment of a single code of conduct in protection of cultural sites; fostering of greater cooperation among different law- enforcement agencies that includes immediate information-sharing among national intelligence agencies; increase cooperation between law enforcement and the art and archaeological communities;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 329 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ab a (new)
(aba) Stresses the significance of military mobility and the EU’s roles in providing the legislative and infrastructural reforms required to ensure speedy movement of Member State forces across Europe; urges resolution to the border crossing &VAT laws authorizing foreign militaries unhindered country access, along with infrastructural redevelopment of bridges, roads and runways;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 334 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ac a (new)
(aca) Notes the growing importance of space security and satellites, stresses the importance of the European Union Satellite Centre and requests the agency to analyse and provide a report regarding the safety and/or vulnerabilities of the EU and Member State satellites to space debris, cyber attack and direct missile attack and to determine areas where EU- US collaboration in space security would be ideal;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 342 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ad a (new)
(ada) Further calls upon the EU & US to jointly provide economic, political and operational support with existing regional forces based in Africa such as the African Union, G5 Sahel Force and Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS);
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 343 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ad b (new)
(adb) Recognises that China’s acquisitions of intellectual property and technological advances by leading research centres are often used to propel its military aims and therefore the EU should work to develop a long-term strategy to counter China’s military-civil fusion (MCF) strategy in Europe;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 344 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ad c (new)
(adc) Recognises that EU & US should coordinate on issue’s where China’s actions are contrary to Euro-Atlantic security interests; prioritization should be given to challenges in the cyber, hybrid, EDT, space, arms control, and non- proliferation areas;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 345 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ad d (new)
(add) Is concerned with the close ties between the CCP and industry in China, particularly security companies; recommends that Member States undertake an internal audit of procurement practices to ensure that products integrated into their national networks and defence institutions are free of technologies coming from companies in China;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 346 #

2023/2126(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ad e (new)
(ade) Consider jointly establishing a C4ISRnetwork with a state of the art command and control systems in the Asia Pacific, in cooperation with Allies throughout Asia, to ensure rapid response capability in addressing security crises in the Asia-Pacific;
2023/10/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2023/2119(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the People’s Republic of China has for many years promoted an alternative narrative, challenging democratic values, open markets, and the rules-based international order; whereas China’s increasing influence in international organisations has impeded positive progress and further excluded Taiwan from rightful participation;
2023/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 362 #

2023/2119(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls for heightened attention to China’s escalating hybrid warfare tactics in the Indo-Pacific, particularly pertaining to Taiwan, which faces five million cyberattacks every day, primarily from China; acknowledges that the potential repercussions of destabilisation in the region would resonate far beyond the Taiwan Strait and directly impact the security of the EU; stresses the importance of developing regular dialogue, cooperation, and capacity building with Taiwan, which possesses substantive expertise and employs scientific methods to counter Chinese cyberattacks and FIMI based on its extensive experience, technological advantages, and linguistic proximity to China;
2023/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 456 #

2023/2119(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Expresses deep concern about China’s increasingly aggressive behaviour in the Taiwan Strait, including its 1,727 fighter jet incursions into Taiwan’s Air Defense Identification Zone in 2022, which is undermining the status quo in the Taiwan Strait; encourages Member States to increase the frequency of freedom of navigation operations in the Taiwan Strait and deepen security dialogues with Taiwan to deter Chinese aggression against the democratic country; condemns China’s disruptive activities in the South China Sea, including island-building, harassment, and dangerous manoeuvres conducted by its navy, coast guard, and maritime militia; believes these actions have raised tensions with neighbouring countries and threatened maritime security in one of the most important global trade routes; calls for greater Coordinated Maritime Presences (CMP) and capacity building with the EU’s partners in the region; stresses the need to cooperate with a broader set of actors in the Indo-Pacific, including Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Taiwan, in terms of information exchange, burden-sharing, and strategic alignment, in order to optimise the use of the EU’s limited resources;
2023/10/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) The Union should also foster close consultation and association of local authorities, which embrace a large variety of sub-national levels and branches of government, including regions, municipalities, rayons and hromadas and their associations, as well as their participation in the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of Ukraine, based on sustainable development and through the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals at local level. Funding should place a special emphasis towards locally based small and medium enterprises and operating in good standing within regions across Ukraine to ensure that sustainable development is directly interlinked with local businesses and entrepreneurs; the introduction of private equity firms that invest in SMEs to assist their growth and incubation should be considered as ideal partners for targeted regional investment. The Union should recognise the multiple roles played by the local authorities as promoters of a territorial approach to local development, including decentralisation processes, participation and accountability, and further enhance its support for local authorities’ capacity building.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 126 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) Reconstruction from the damage caused by the war of Russian aggression cannot be limited to rebuilding what was destroyed as it was before the war. The reconstruction offers an opportunity to support Ukraine in its process of integration into the Single Market and in accelerating its sustainable green and digital transitions, in line with Union policies. The Facility should promote reconstruction in a way that modernises and improves Ukraine’s economy and society, building on Union rules and standards, by investing in the transition of Ukraine towards a green, digital and inclusive economy and in the recovery, reconstruction and modernisation of its critical infrastructure, productive capacity and human capital in a resilient way. It should also take into account the need to create habitable spaces resistant to the likely future aggressive actions of Russia using the best modern practices of urban planning.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 131 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31 a (new)
(31a) The Facility should also include provisions that would allow using frozen and confiscated Russian funds and assets as additional sources of financing, should an appropriate legal framework of doing so be established;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 133 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) The Facility should contribute to alleviating and repairing enormous environmental damage caused by Russian aggressors, including the floods caused by blowing up the Kakhovka hydroelectric dam and bombing and mining of a large territory of Ukraine. It should also contribute to the adherence to the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification and should not contribute to environmental degradation or cause harm to the environment or climate. In particular, funding allocated in the context of the Facility should be coherent with the long-term goal of holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre- industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1,5°C. It should also be coherent with the objective to increase the ability to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change and foster climate resilience, and with the support of biodiversity conservation, circular economy and zero-pollution. Particular attention should be given to actions that create co-benefits and meet multiple objectives, including for climate, biodiversity and the environment.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 138 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) The implementation of this Regulation should be guided by the principles of equality and non- discrimination, as elaborated in the Union of Equality strategies. It should promote gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls, and seek to protect and promote women’s and girls’ rights in line with the EU Gender Action Plans and relevant Council conclusions and international conventions. The implementation of the Facility should be in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in its investments and technical assistance. It should also support and promote the implementation of a child care system reform strategy in Ukraine.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 142 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) Strengthening the rule of law, including the independence of the judiciary, the fight against corruption, money laundering and organised crime, as well as transparency, good governance at all levels, through guaranteeing the legal personality of municipalities and maintaining support for NATO standardisation and integration to ensure that stabilisation efforts are long-lasting and thus generate encouraging conditions for investment while safeguarding the free and pluralistic media and fighting disinformation, strengthening public administration reform, including in the fields of public procurement, competition and State aid, remain key challenges and are essential for Ukraine to come closer to the Union and to prepare to fully assume the obligations of Union membership. In view of the longer-term nature of the reforms pursued in those areas and the need to build up track records, support under the Ukraine Facility should address those issues as early as possible.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 148 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) Actions under the Ukraine Facility should also support, where appropriate, confidence-building measures and processes that promote justice, truth- seeking, reparations and guarantees of non- recurrence as well as collection of evidence of crimes committed during the war. for the purpose of creating an international tribunal to consider crime of war on aggression and crimes committed by Russia during the full-scale war in Ukraine.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 155 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) The support under the Facility should be made available under the precondition that Ukraine continues to respect effective democratic mechanisms and institutions, including a multi-party parliamentary system, and the rule of law, and to guarantee respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities., as well as continued advances in fighting corruption;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 210 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 78
(78) It is important to guarantee both flexibility and programmability as well as stability in providing Union support to Ukraine. For that purpose, payments under the Facility should occur according to a fixed quarterly schedule, subject to availability of funding, based on a payment request submitted by Ukraine and following verification by the Commission of the satisfactory fulfilment of the relevant conditions. In case a condition is not fulfilled in accordance with the indicative timeline set in the decision approving the Plan, the Commission should deduct from the payment an amount corresponding to those conditions. The disbursement of the corresponding withheld funds could take place during the next payment window and up to twelve months after the original deadline set out in the indicative timeline, provided the conditions have been fulfilled.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 233 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 90
(90) The reinforcement of internal control systems, the fight against corruption, the promotion of transparency, good administration, and efficient public financial management and strengthening the civil society are important reform priorities for Ukraine and should be supported by the Facility.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 283 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) foster the transition to a sustainable and inclusive economy and a stable investment environment; support the integration of Ukraine into the Single Market; repair, rebuild and improve social infrastructure, such as housing, healthcare facilities, schools and higher education institutions, and research infrastructure; strengthen economic and social development, with particular attention to women and youth, including through quality education, training, reskilling and upskilling, specific exchange programmes for students, researchers and public servants, and employment policies, including for researchers; support culture and cultural heritage; strengthen strategic economic sectors and support investment and private sector development, with a focus on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and innovation, as well as on agriculture and rural development, aquaculture and fisheries; restructure Ukraine’s financial markets, including banking sector and capital markets; increase domestic revenue mobilisation; strengthen Ukraine’s ability to trade;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 292 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) further strengthen the rule of law, democracy, the respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including through promoting an independent judiciary, reinforced security, the fight against fraud, corruption, organised crime and money laundering, tax evasion and tax fraud; compliance with international law; strengthen freedom of media and academic freedom and an enabling environment for civil society; foster social dialogue; promote the rights of children, as well as non-discrimination and tolerance, to ensure and strengthen respect for the rights of persons belonging to minorities and the promotion of gender equality; reinforce the effectiveness of public administration and support transparency, structural reforms and good governance at all levels, including in the areas of public financial management and public procurement and State aid; support initiatives and bodies involved in supporting and enforcing international justice in Ukraine;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 299 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) support decentralisation and local development. in accordance with plans put forward by Ukraine;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 311 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. The Facility shall not support activities or measures which are incompatible with Ukraine’s National Energy and Climate Plan, if available, with Ukraine’s Nationally Determined Contribution under the Paris Agreement, or that promote investments in fossil fuels, or that cause significant adverse effects on the environment or the climate, unless such activities or measures are strictly necessary to achieve the objectives of the Facility, taking into account the need to rebuild and modernise infrastructure damaged by the war in a resilient way, and they are accompanied, where relevant, by appropriate measures to avoid, prevent or reduce and, if possible, offset these effects.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 321 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. A precondition for the support to Ukraine under the Facility shall be that Ukraine continues to uphold and respect effective democratic mechanisms, including a multi-party parliamentary system, and the rule of law, and to guarantee respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. , and to continue to fight corruption and build adequate safeguards and institutions for countering it;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 339 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States, third countries, international organisations, international financial institutions or other sources may provide additional financial contributions to the Facility. Such contributions shall constitute external assigned revenue within the meaning of Article 21(2), points (a)(ii), (d), and (e) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046. Moreover, the Facility shall be open for additional financial contributions coming from the Russian frozen and / or confiscated assets and funds should the relevant legal framework to do so be put in place;
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 364 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Member States, Ukraine, contracting parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area and countries covered by Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2021/947 and Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2021/1529 of the European Parliament and of the Council22 , as well as United Kingdom; _________________ 22 Regulation (EU) 2021/1529 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 September 2021 establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession assistance (IPA III) (OJ L 330, 20.9.2021, p. 1).
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 451 #

2023/0200(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. Payments of the non-repayable financial support and of the loan to Ukraine under this Article shall be made in accordance with the budget appropriations and subject to the available funding. Payments shall be made in instalments. An instalment may be disbursed in one or more tranches.
2023/09/07
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 152 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Regrets that the side-lining of Türkiye by the EU has resulted in Ankara's transactional relationship with Russia; warns that further alienation of Türkiye by the EU may push it towards even closer cooperation with hostile powers such as Russia and China;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 166 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates that Türkiye, being a NATO member, is an indispensable partner for the EU in terms of regional stability; stresses that the EU should engage more with Türkiye on issues such as migration and tackling Russian imperialism;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 239 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Acknowledges Türkiye 's efforts and contributions with regard to migration, including hosting a large refugee population of over 3.5 million Syrians under temporary protection and 330,000 applicants and beneficiaries of international protection; welcomes Türkiye 's efforts in dismantling migrant smuggling networks as during 2022 over 285,000 irregular migrants were apprehended together with 9,149 migrant smugglers;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Acknowledges the importance of Türkiye's counterterrorism efforts and contribution to EU security and defence;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 353 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers, in view of all the above, that in the absence of a drastic change of course by the Turkish Government, Türkiye’s EU accession process has lost its purpose and will not endure much longer in the current circumstances; recommends, in that case, starting a reflection process to find an alternative and realistic framework for EU-Türkiye relations in substitution for the accession process; calls on the Commission, therefore, to explore possible formats for a mutually appealing framework through a comprehensive and inclusive process;deleted
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 368 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Is of the opinion that the EU accession process is still relevant for Türkiye's future policy orientation and is a strategic objective; stresses that that strengthened accession perspective will serve mutual interests and encourage Türkiye to implement further reforms; believes that accession negotiations are the only valid platform to enhance longstanding engagement between the EU and Türkiye;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2022/2195(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that Uzbekistan also plays a crucial role in regional security and economic stability, especially in terms of the fight against illegal immigration, organized crime, terrorism and corruption ;
2023/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 28 #

2022/2195(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that Uzbekistan can play an important role and be a reliable partner in the region in exporting precious metals to Europe, which are needed for the EU’s green transition;
2023/05/02
Committee: INTA
Amendment 401 #

2022/2050(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Expresses grave concern over China’s continued military belligerence, pressure, assault exercises, airspace violations and other grey-zone military actions including cyber and disinformation campaigns against Taiwan; urges China to stop all these actions, restore the full respect of the Taiwan Strait’s median line; reiterates any change to cross-strait relations must be neither unilateral nor against the will of the Taiwanese people; stresses that peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait has a direct impact on European security and prosperity;
2022/10/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 308 #

2022/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. expresses grave concern at Chinese government’s position indicated at the CCP’s 20th Party Congress that China will never renounce the right to use force over Taiwan; reiterates that the status quo of the Taiwan Strait should not be unilaterally altered against the will of the Taiwanese people; is of the view that the dispute between Taiwan and China should be solved through peaceful dialogues without any preconditions;
2022/10/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 324 #

2022/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines that Taiwan is a key EU partner and democratic ally in the Indo-Pacific region, one that contributes to maintaining a rules-based international order and upholds fundamental values; strongly urges the EU and its Member States to intensify cooperation and pursue a comprehensive enhanced partnership with Taiwan, notably essential cooperation on critical supply chain resilience, and countering disinformation and foreign interference.
2022/10/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 326 #

2022/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Strongly advocate Taiwan’s meaningful participation as an observer in the meetings, mechanism and activities of the World Health Organization, UNFCCC, International Civil Aviation Organization and Interpol;
2022/10/24
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Reinforcing the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) throughout the Union should therefore be at the core of those efforts. Indeed difficulties and gaps still exist and the European defence industrial base remains highlycapabilities remain fragmented, lacking sufficient collaborative action and inter- operability of products.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 79 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The current geopolitical situation in the Eastern neighbourhood of the Union has shown that, whereas the duplication of efforts should be avoided, a diversified defence market can contribute to the variety of products immediately available on the market and can therefore be beneficial to an adequate satisfaction of Member States’ urgent needs.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 80 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) FurthermoreNevertheless, efforts should be made so that the increased spending results in a much stronger European Defence Technological and Industrial Base. Indeed, without coordination andDTIB throughout the Union. Closer cooperation, together withe increased national investments, are likely to deepen the fragmentation of the European defence industrystrengthen the European defence capabilities as well as increase global competitiveness and efficiency of the defence industry across the Union.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 87 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In the light of the above challenges and the related structural changes in the EU Defence industry, it appears necessary to speed up the adjustment of the European Defence Technological and Industrial BaseDTIB, enhance its competitiveness and efficiency, and thereby contribute to strengthening and reforming Member States’ defence industrial capabilities. Addressing industrial shortfalls throughout the Union should include promptly tackling the most urgent gaps.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 91 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) Common investment and defence procurement should in particular be incentivised, as such collaborative actions would ensure that the necessary changes in the EU industrial base takes place in a collaborative manner, avoiding further fragmentation of the industry.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 186 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to foster cooperation in defence procurement process between participating Member States in order to contributinge to solidarity, interoperability, and prevention of crowding- out effects, avoiding fragmentation and increasings well as to reduce fragmentation, when it is not beneficial for the competition and diversity of products available on the European defence market, and to increase the effectiveness of public spending.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 39 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
— having regard to its resolution of 15 April 2015 on the centenary of the Armenian Genocide,
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes, however,Welcomes that there has been a slight improvement over the past year in overall EU-Turkey relations, which have on average remained stable, as enhanced cooperation and dialogue on a number of issues have coexisted with regular conflicts; expresses its hope that this pattern of ‘conflictual cooperation’ can be overcome and replaced with a more positive dynamic;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 204 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its strong condemnation of Turkey’s withdrawal, by presidential decree,Calls on Turkey to address the increasing prevalence of domestic violence and discrimination against women, despite Turkey’s withdrawal from the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (the Istanbul Convention);
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 342 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Expresses its concerns at the extradition treaty signed between Turkey and the People's Republic of China in 2017; encourages the Turkish parliament not to ratify the extradition treaty as this would pose great risks to the Uyghur community in the country;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 390 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Commends Turkey's decision to invoke the 1936 Montreux Convention, by blocking Russian warships from passage through the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits, following the Russian invasion in Ukraine; welcomes the delivery of Bayraktar drones by Turkey to the Ukrainian army; encourages Turkey to close its airspace to Russian aircrafts;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 417 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. ANotes the importance for both the EU and its Member States and Turkey of maintaining close dialogue and cooperation on foreign policy and security issues; acknowledges that Turkey can pursue its own foreign policy in line with its interests and goals, but expects this policy to be defended through diplomacy and dialogue based on international law and, as a candidate country, to be increasingly aligned with that of the EU;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 425 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Recalls that Turkey is a longstanding member of the NATO alliance and sits at a key geostrategic location for maintaining regional and European security; notes that the EU and Turkey continue to cooperate on issues of (military) strategic importance within the NATO framework; recalls further that the EU and NATO remain the most reliable long-term partners for Turkey in international security cooperation and calls on Turkey to maintain political coherence in the fields of foreign and security policies in view of its role as member of NATO and EU candidate country and to recommit fully to NATO as its sole security anchor;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes the protests against possible minority government organised by the Democratic Front and; strongly condemns the support expressed for the Russian Federation on the day of the start of Russian aggression against Ukraine, but notes relatively small scale of these demonstrations; recalls Russia’s persistent interest in destabilising the country;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets that key positions in negotiating structures have remained vacant for a long time; urges the authorities to re-establish a fully functional negotiating structure as soon as possible and welcomes recent positive developments and appointments of new negotiators and heads of working groups for 33 chapters of the Acquis;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes Montenegro’s continued and full alignment with EU Common Foreign and Security Policy, including its announcement of support for the latest EU sanctions against Russia, and itlignment with the latest EU sanctions against Russia, including the ban on overflight of their airspace by Russian flights and access to airports, prohibition of transactions with Russia's Central Bank and suspension of broadcasting Russian state-owned media; notes Russian response and adding Montenegro to the list of "enemy states"; welcomes Montenegro's active participation in EU Common Security and Defence Policy missions and operations;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Is deeply concerned by the continuing political tensions between and within the executive and legislative powers, and by the boycottcurrent blocking of organising plenary sessions of the parliament, which continues to slow down the reform process;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 79 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates its strong recommendation that Montenegro shouldWelcomes the adoption on 4 February 2022 of amendments to the Law on Local Self Government, which foresees holding local elections simultaneously across the countryin all 14 municipalities at the same date;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Expresses concern about the high degree of polarisation in the media landscape, in particular the growing volume of disinformation spreading ethno- nationalist narratives that negatively impact democratic processes in the country; is also concerned with Russian propaganda in the country, targeting especially NATO, the EU and the US;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Condemns all violent acts during the demonstrations in Cetinje linked to the inauguration of the head of the Metropolitanate of Montenegro and the Littoral of the Serbian Orthodox Church; condemns Serbian interference in this regard;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes progress on the protection and promotion of LGBTIQ rights and the first same-sex marriage in July 2021;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2021/2247(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls on the Montenegrin authorities to take concrete steps to build resilience and cybersecurity as it faces increasing pressure from third country interference; invites Montenegro to fully participate in and utilise NATO programmes and initiatives in this regards;
2022/03/23
Committee: AFET
Amendment 46 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas all BiH citizens should enjoy equal rights and obligations throughout BiH territory; whereas the country has committed to international obligations to end systematic ethnicity and residence-based discrimination and ensure citizens’ equality before the law; whereas the nature of the state of BiH should reflect that it is shared by three constituent peoples;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas it is crucial to ensure legitimate representation of the constituent peoples;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 76 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates its clear support for BiH’s democratic transformation through European integration, based on sovereignty and territorial integrity, grounded in the principles of equality and non- discrimination of all citizens and constituent peoples as enshrined in the constitution; recalls that according to Article 4 TEU the European Union shall respect the national identities of Member States, inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self- government;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the impasse in negotiations on electoral law reform in BiH, that should allow the Croats to elect the Croation representative in the Presidency, and the lack of political will to overcome it; calls on all actors to promptly reach a balanced agreement, to fulfil the constitutional duty of democratic governance and to ensure the transparency and integrity of the electoral process;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 106 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Strongly denounces the disregard for international and national norms and obligations, all hate rhetoric and disruptive action, including withdrawal from institutions, particularly by the leadership of the Republika Srpska entity, which destabilises the country, undermines its statehood in violation of the Dayton Peace Agreement and systematically hampers decisions on key laws and reforms; rejects all attempts to form parallel parastatal institutions, which undermine state institutions, legal order, judicial independence and sovereignty; calls for a full, non-selective and unconditional return to all state institutions; also denounces the unitarian concept of the state promoted by the Bosniak leadership which is not in accordance with the fact that Bosnia and Herzegovina is composed of three equal constituent peoples and others and with the constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the European legal acquis;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 177 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Supports transparent and inclusive constitutional and electoral reforms to ensure equality and non-discrimination of all citizens, enhance and constituent peoples; insists on the implementation of the decision of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina on finding mechanisms so that none of the constituent peoples can elect political representatives of other constituent peoples, especially in the House of Peoples; supports enhancing accountability and transforming BiH into a fully functional and inclusive state by immediately implementing rulings, opinions and recommendations of competent courts and international bodies; supports transatlantic facilitation efforts to this end;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 224 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for urgent action to tackle widespread selective justice, state capture, nepotism, cronyism, high-level corruption and criminal infiltration; reiterates the urgent need for judicial reform across BiH to improve the professionalism and integrity of the judiciary and for administrative reform to eradicate corruption;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 249 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Deplores threats from the authorities against civil society; condemns growing restrictions on freedom of expression in the Republika Srpska entity; also points out the lack of freedom of press and political influence on media in the entity of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 295 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Reiterates its call to urgently end segregation and discrimination in education, including by implementing court rulings to end the discriminatory illegal practice of ‘two schools under one roof’; recalls that according to Article 165 (1) TFEU the European Union shall fully respect the responsibility of the Member States for the content of teaching and the organisation of the education systems and their cultural and linguistic diversity; reiterates that according to Article 165 (4) TFEU any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States is excluded from the EU incentive measures in the field of education;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 327 #

2021/2245(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls for the EU to take concrete steps to integrate the Western Balkans and BiH within a broader strategic and security context, also in view of the Russian aggression against Ukraine, and its attempts to disrupt the European path of the Western Balkans, by means of disinformation and malign interference destabilising the country and region;
2022/05/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 37
— having regard to the joint statement of the EU and the UN of 25 September4 January 201822 on reinforcing the UN-EU Strategic Partnership on Peace Operations and Crisis Management: Priorities 201922-20214,
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 37 a (new)
— having regard to the Council conclusions (5591/22) on the European security situation, as approved by the Council at its meeting held on 24 January 2022,
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 9 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 37 b (new)
— having regard to the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE),
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 38
— having regard to the Minsk Protocol of 5 September 2014, the Minsky Memorandum of 19 September 2014, the package of measures for the implementation of the Minsk Agreements, adopted and signed in Minsk on 12 February 2015, and endorsed as a whole by the UN Security Council in Resolution 2202 (2015) of 17 February 2015,
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 49 a (new)
— having regard to the creation of the Associated Trio that has come into being on May 17th 2021 as a platform of cooperation among the three most advanced countries of EaP (Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine),
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 49 b (new)
— having regard to the common declaration of the Parliamentary Commissions of Foreign Affairs of the Associated Trio as well as the ones of Poland and Lithuania adopted on December 13th 2021 on strengthening the cooperation within the scope of human rights monitoring in the territories of the EaP states occupied by Russia,
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 50
— having regard to its previous resolutions on Russia, especially those related to Russia’s actions in the territories of the EaP countries, violations of the rights of the Crimean Tatars, the occupation of parts of the territory of Georgia and Ukraine and related borderisation activities, ands well as hostile propaganda and disinformation against the EU and the EaP countries,
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 56 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the EU-US Security Dialogue represents an important opportunity to maximize the added value of transatlantic relations in security and defence and should dedicate ample time and resources to improving the security environment in the EaP region;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas The Three Seas Initiative (3SI) involving twelve countries on the EU’s Eastern and South flanks and some 112 million citizens co-operating to develop infrastructure, energy, transport and digital networks, is a critical development that can be expanded to include EaP countries in an effort to further strengthen ties with the EU;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas President Putin’s Russia has engaged in continuous hybrid warfare against EaP countries, backed by the ever- present threat of force across the region, armed aggression, illegal occupation and attempted annexation against Ukraine, to keep states politically off-balance and tied to Moscow’s self-declared sphere of influence, effectively removing the right of EaP countries to choose their own alliances in contravention of the relevant OSCE principles enshrined in the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 the Paris Charter of 1990 as well as the Istanbul (1999) and Astana (2010) documents;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas in September 2021, Russia’s joint ZAPAD military exercise with Belarus and several other countries in the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) comprised as many as 200 000 troops training in counterinsurgency, urban warfare and cyber-attacks in a non-transparent display of force, while the upcoming joint Russia- Belarus 'Allied Resolve' military exercises, demonstrated that Russia’s gap in military capabilities is rapidly closing while its aim of deepening its political and military relations with CSTO countries is rising;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the Normandy Format and Minsk I & II Agreements have failed to end hostilities between Ukraine and Russian-backed separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk; whereas theillegal armed formations in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine; whereas the international armed conflict in the Donbas region has killed more than 14 000 people;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas Russia, against the backdrop of a crisis on the EU-Belarusian border, has amassed over 10027 000 troops on the border of Ukraine in an offensive formation while increasing its hybrid warfare tactics targeting the elected government in Kyiv, creating widespread concern about a potential second invasion of Ukraine;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 119 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas following the electoral unrest, Belarus has largely abandoned its aim of fostering better relations with the EU, having reversed trends towards democratisation and taken to weaponising refugeemigrants in an attempt to uproot domestic aspirations towards liberalisation and destabilise EU Member States;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
J a. whereas Member States, Ukraine and other international partners established the International Crimea Platform – a consultation and coordination format aimed at increasing the effectiveness of the international response to the ongoing illegal occupation of Crimea, Ukraine, reaffirming the non- recognition of its annexation and achieving de-occupation of Crimea and its peaceful return under Ukraine’s control;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas hybrid threats in the years to come will see the systematic combination of information warfare, agile force manoeuvre, mass cyber warfare and emerging and disruptive technologies from sea-bed to space with both advanced air- breathing and space–based surveillance and strike systems deployed, all of which will be enabled by advanced artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, increasingly ‘intelligent’ drone swarm technologies, offensive cyber capabilities, hypersonic missile systems, and Nano- tech and bio-warfare;;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 156 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
O a. whereas if CSDP missions are to achieve mission objectives, they must begin advisory and training in coping with emerging and disruptive technologies that are rapidly entering the ‘frozen conflict’ environment;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 158 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas the EU’s Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC) will havehas to consider how to protect a deployed EU force-led missions against such increasing threats;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
P a. whereas CSDP missions in EaP countries must remain in place as long as they are deemed necessary by recipient countries and Member States to ensure the accomplishment of mission objectives;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 170 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital R
R. whereas the CSDP will also require close coordination with NATO’s defence and deterrence posture and the Open Door Policy in addition to close EU-NATO coordination being needed to ensure coherence between the EU’s Strategic Compass and the next NATO Strategic Concept;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital T a (new)
T a. whereas the mission has a further five priorities: national and state security, organised and cross-border crime, criminal justice, community safety and police management, and digital transformation and innovation;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 174 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital t b (new)
T b. whereas EUAM is conducting its activities in partnership with the National Security Council and the Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 175 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital T c (new)
T c. whereas EUAM works with Ukraine’s court system via its prosecutors to ensure independence and efficiency of the prosecution via digitisation, e-case management and human resources management with a key emphasis on attestation to ensure prosecutors prove the existence of claims via evidence;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 176 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital T d (new)
T d. whereas EUAM collaborates with Europol’s Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA) in assisting Ukrainian authorities in capacity building measures and integrated border management to support its criminal investigation capabilities and counter organised crime;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 177 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital T e (new)
T e. whereas EUAM trains and equips Ukrainian police forces via its regional field offices and collaboration with neighbouring provinces to ensure the integrity of local law enforcement and safety of local communities;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 178 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital T f (new)
T f. whereas EUAM concentrates its police training initiatives via the provision of strategic advice and a ‘Community Safety Dialogue’ and trains local police in key areas such as: defensive driving, interview techniques, gender mainstreaming, de-escalation techniques and digitisation;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 179 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U
U. whereas the EUAM’s work in assisting the reform of the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU), including under draft bill 3196, remains its highest priority and it must concentrate its efforts on implementingsupport to the implementation of the reform to ensure the SSU relephases any extrinsic functionsout pre-trial investigative powers, demilitarises the service, has a clear division of competences with other security agencies, effective oversight and fewer pre-trial and detention powers, and that it downsizes itself in accordance with democratic developments, and that it downsizes itself;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U a (new)
U a. whereas if properly implemented, Bill 3196 sets the SSU to concentrate its efforts on counterintelligence, counteraction to threats to state security, counterterrorism, cyber security, protection of national statehood and territorial integrity and protection of state secrets;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U b (new)
U b. whereas the necessary reforms to ensure democratic development call for the SSU to undergo: a clear separation of functions, removal from the investigation of economic and corruption crimes (except in exceptional cases when authorised by the Attorney General), political independence, demilitarisation and further optimisation, greater transparency and accountability and added focus on the protection of critical infrastructure;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 182 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U c (new)
U c. whereas the EUAM’s assistance in establishing the Bureau of Economic Security (BES), targeting financial crime throughout Ukraine is a key reform effort in Ukraine’s investigation and law enforcement on economic crime;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 183 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U d (new)
U d. whereas the transparent selection of BES personnel and the disbandment of the State Fiscal Service and Tax Militia are critical to the gradual reduction of oligarch influence over Ukraine’s economy;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 184 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U e (new)
U e. whereas BES is set to inherit pre- trial investigative powers from SSU in the sphere of economic security and must support Ukraine’s efforts to resist pressure from law-enforcement institutions while effectively transferring the powers currently held by the Tax Militia;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 185 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital V
V. whereas in 2020, the EUAM established its fourth field office in Mariupol, close to the lineto support the implementation of coentact, torally-led reforms at regional and local levels such as the training and adviseing of local law enforcement, reflecting the growing role of the EUAM in strengthening Ukraine’s resilience across the country and the desire of various oblasts to assist in their alignment with CSDP objectives;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 189 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital W
W. whereas in its 13 years of existence, the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM) has represented the strong political commitment of the EU in the region by providing stability and security to conflict-affected communitiescontributing to confidence building and providing stability on the ground and in the wider region;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 191 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital X
X. whereas the EUMM currently hosts 325 Mission members, including over 200 civilian monitors with an allocated budget of EUR 44.8 million and a mandate up for renewal in December 2022;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 194 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Y
Y. whereas the original mandate from 2008 remains unchanged as regards monitoring the implementation of the six- point agreement, which calls for: no recourse to use violence, cessation of hostilities, granting access to humanitarian aid, return of Georgian armed forces to their usual quarters, withdrawal of Russian armed forces to pre-hostility positions and the opening of international discussion on security and stability of South Ossetia and Abkhazia;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 196 #

2021/2199(INI)

Z. whereas Russia does not comply with the sSix-point aAgreement as it maintains a presence of armed forces and Federal Security Service (FSB) agents in the Abkhazia and Tskhinvali regions, who prevent the EUMM from entering the territories that are beyond the control of the Government of Georgia, a critical obstruction to the accomplishment of mission objectivesand Russian Federation Border Guards in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 197 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Z a (new)
Z a. whereas the EUMM continues to be denied physical access to the breakaway regions despite its mandate being valid throughout all of Georgia, a critical obstruction to the accomplishment of mission objectives;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 199 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AA
AA. whereas flagrant violations of the sSix-point aAgreement and ceasefire by occupying forces arethe Russian Federation continues and is often met with limited responses or calls to action by Member States, or no response at all, which risks emboldening the occupying forcesRussian Federation to carry out more such actions;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 201 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AA a (new)
AA a. whereas the mandate allows focusing on hybrid threats, human rights, radicalization, terrorism, minorities, and environmental aspects of security;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 202 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AA b (new)
AA b. whereas EUMM is not a typical civilian mission due to its mandate and focus on monitoring activities, civilian competency building and leads confidence-building activities via small grants and targeted projects between the two sides;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 203 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AA c (new)
AA c. whereas EUMM has created an Advisory Committee on Hybrid Warfare and participates in Joint Training Courses for Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) analysis;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 204 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AA d (new)
AA d. whereas EUMM has regular contacts with the NATO Liaison Office and the team that implements the Substantial NATO-Georgia Package;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 205 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AA e (new)
AA e. whereas EUMM facilitates Incident Prevention and Response Mechanism meetings in Ergneti and ensures the regularity of these meetings which address the security situation on the ground, which include the Government of Georgia, breakaway regions, and the Russian Federation; unfortunately a similar mechanism in Gali, Abkhazia is on hold;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 207 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AB
AB. whereas the EUMM has a constant need to adapt its technical capabilities to address the growing threat of hybrid warfareexpand its analytical focus and capabilities to address the persistent hybrid threats;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 211 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AD
AD. whereas the EUMM has created a newbeen managing the “Hotline”, a confidence- building mechanism – a ‘hotline’ – which is the onlywhich serves as a channel of communication between the Government of Georgia and the de facto authorities in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, including Russia’s FSBn Federation border guards deployed in both territorieregions; whereas this hHotline was activated 3 0over 2100 times in 20201;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 213 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AE
AE. whereas on 24 October 2019, for the first time in over 10 years, FSB border guards crossed the occupation line, detaining EUMM border guards on territory clearly within the borders of Georgia and forcing the EUMM to negotiate their release;deleted
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 215 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AF
AF. whereas the EUMM’s role in securingfacilitating effective exchanges of information, for example in connection with medical crossings or the release of persons detained border guards, as well as its efforts to assist sick people from the territories in getting treatment in Georgiaat the Administrative Boundary Lines (ABLs), as well as in co- facilitating in-person discussions at the Incident Prevention and Response Mechanism (IPRM) meetings in Ergneti, adds tremendous value to the important role the EUMM plays in both conflict management and confidence building;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 218 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AF a (new)
AF a. whereas Georgia is one of the biggest contributors per capita to CSDP missions in Africa;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 221 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG a (new)
AG a. whereas EUBAM is designed to bolster border and customs capabilities of Moldova and Ukraine and is tasked with: combating customs fraud, drug smuggling, irregular migration and trafficking in human beings, supporting trade facilitation, integrated border management and assisting a peaceful settlement of the Transnistrian conflict through the ‘5+2’ process;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 222 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG b (new)
AG b. whereas EUBAM assists Moldova and Ukraine to fulfil the obligations of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) as part of their Association Agreements with the EU;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 223 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG c (new)
AG c. whereas tobacco smuggling, including counterfeit products, is presently assessed as one of the most serious risks to border security at the Moldova-Ukraine border, causing an estimated loss of €10 billion per year to the state budgets of Moldova, Ukraine and Member States;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 224 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG d (new)
AG d. whereas EUBAM Task Force Drugs seeks to engage Mission’s partner services with other drug enforcement authorities in the region and to establish an intelligence-led approach in fighting drug smuggling;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 225 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG e (new)
AG e. whereas EUBAM is assisting the border services of Moldova and Ukraine in the development of general common indicators used for the identification of victims of trafficking, the enhancement of risk analysis and selectivity during border checks, advising in the development of new relevant working methodologies and data collection methods;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 226 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG f (new)
AG f. whereas EUBAM has been a consistent advocate for the re-opening of the international transport corridors that cross Transnistria and develops and advocates for technical confidence- building measures between Chisinau and Tiraspol on transport, customs, veterinary and phytosanitary, and law enforcement issues;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 227 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG g (new)
AG g. whereas despite Transnistria serving as a safe haven for human smugglers and organized crime, EUBAM played an important role in helping to re- open rail freight through Transnistria that had been suspended for six years and in 2020 aided in launching a direct dialogue between Tiraspol and Chisinau;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 228 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG h (new)
AG h. whereas from 2020-2021 EUBAM thwarted multiple smuggling operations, seizing copious amounts of ammunition, tobacco, alcohol, ethanol and heroin;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 229 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG i (new)
AG i. whereas EUBAM collaborates with multiple international organisations including Europol, FRONTEX and OSCE via its Arms Working Group, ORIO II Joint Operations and ‘EU 4 Border Security’ initiatives;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AH a (new)
AH a. whereas the Russian Federation maintains a peacekeeping mission in Transnistria of approx, 500 soldiers and the Operative Group of Russian Troops (OGRT) of approx. 1 500 soldiers, exercises control over the separatist armed groups of Transnistria and hosts over 100 joint military exercises annually with Transnistria;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 235 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AK a (new)
AK a. whereas the Defence Reform Advisory Board, comprised of high-level experts from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Poland, Germany and Lithuania, is the highest-level international advisory body in Ukraine, reporting directly to the Ukrainian Minister of Defence and Chief of the General Staff;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 238 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AK b (new)
AK b. whereas the role of China in competing in the region for political, social and economic influence is growing in EaP countries where Chinese investment combines cheap loans that drive up debt-GDP ratios with the projected outcome being a default in EaP countries, leading to aggressive recompense, often in the form of ownership of strategic infrastructure and policy alignment;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 240 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AK c (new)
AK c. whereas the influence of third countries in EaP countries, notably Iran, is largely concentrated in the South Caucasus where its longstanding cultural, religious, political and economic influence continues to grow, which risks undermining the security and stability of some EaP countries due to assassination attempts linked to Iranian IRGC operatives in Georgia and Azerbaijan, creating further concern for the EU’s efforts to promote security, stability and good neighbourliness among EaP countries;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 245 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AL a (new)
AL a. whereas Nord Stream II represents an important tool for Russia to increase its political and economic leverage over Member States and EaP countries, likely to lead to further subversion and aggression towards EU’s EaP and CSDP policies;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 246 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AL b (new)
AL b. whereas there is a high biofuel potential in EaP countries which can better utilize domestic biofuel resources such as ethanol, silage and others as a means to reduce energy dependency;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 247 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AL c (new)
AL c. whereas the threats posed to the EU’s East not only concern friction with Russia but also terrorism, organised crime, human trafficking, corruption, mass irregular migration, and a host of other threats to the cohesion of societies both within and outside the EU;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 264 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the decision of the European Council of 2 December 2021 to utilise the European Peace Facility (EPF) in providing Ukraine with a package of EUR 31 million, Georgia with a package of EUR 12.75 million and Moldova with a package of EUR 7 million to assist in strengthening their resilience and defence capabilities, particularly cybersecurity, medical, engineering, mobile and logistics capabilities; encourages further utilisation of the EPF to increase the ability of EaP countries, particularly those hosting CSDP missions, in further addressing their security needs in key areas such as the equipment necessary to exchange intelligence via secure communication lines, particularly those EaP countries hosting CSDP mission and technical tools needed to counter hybrid threats;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 277 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Reaffirms its unwavering support to the EaP countries, and in particular for their independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within their internationally recognised borders;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 280 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AL d (new)
AL d. whereas CSDP’s access to both planning, resources and logistics gives it the potential to become the primary enabler of civilian crisis management during emergencies and should be used as a practice hub of societal resilience and recovery in the face of both man-made and natural disasters;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 288 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages Member States to ensure that any provision of equipment support via the EPF to EaP countries is in line with the needs of the EaP country and is carried out in collaborordination with NATOrespective NATO capacity building initiatives for partner countries and strategic planning in order to avoid unnecessary duplication;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 292 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Considers involving some EaP partners in the early stage of CSDP mission/operations planning, especially those missions/operations that the EaP partners host or will be hosting;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 294 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Encourages Member States to extend participation of EaP countries to the European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats (Hybrid COE);
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the CPCCivilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC), Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC), EU Military Committee (EUMC) and EU military staff (EUMS) to develop a model for generating and sharing best practices with regard to campaign or mission planning concepts, at the earliest possible stage, with partners vital to campaign success;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 320 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the CPCC and the EU Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC) to emphasise the importance of professional civil-military education for all staff in CSDP missions through mechanisms such as the Professional Development Program (PDP);
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 322 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Welcomes the roll out of Military Advisors to EU Missions and Delegations and encourages efforts to further strengthen security and defence expertise inside EU Delegations;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 323 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS), particularly the CPCC, and the EUMC to better adapt to building interagency working groups with exercising and training;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 347 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Invites Member States to reinforce cooperation with NATO, also through the upcoming EU-NATO joint declaJoint Declaration on EU-NATO cooperation, in supporting the defence and security capacity of our neighboubuilding of our partners toin the eEastern neighbourhood;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 358 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Encourages Member States to ensure that the digital transition undertaken in EaP countries is safeguarded from malign activities and thus encourages further utilization of the EU’s existing flagship cyber capacity- building initiatives in the region – CyberEast and EU4Digitalto include the establishment of legal and administrative structures to certify software and hardware, coordinate national CERT teams and cyber forensic and investigative bodies across Europe;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 375 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Encourages Member States to use the third-country PESCO agreement over military mobility as a template for EaP country participation, with an emphasis onPESCO participating Member States to tailoring PESCO projects to the needs of EU CSDP missions and onperations, e.g. developing highly encrypted secure civilian communication systems, and in accordance with the general conditions for third-State participation in PESCO projects, to consider inviting EaP countries that meet these general conditions;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 387 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission, the EEAS and particularly the CPCC to ensure that the EUAM maintains as its priority the reform of Ukraine’s national security servicethe Security Service of Ukraine and to extend the scope of the cooperation with the SSU on cybersecurity, countering terrorism and hybrid threats;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 394 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Encourages Member States to extend EUAM cooperation to all anti- corruption structures involved in the reform of the Civilian Security Sector and to include, either in the form of training and instruction or on the basis of sharing best practices and jointly setting future priorities, both Ukraine’s National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NAZK) and its Highthe anti-corruption apparatus of the Ukrainian state, NAPC, and the Supreme Anti- Corruption Court;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 397 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Encourages Member states to recommend the inclusion in ongoing training courses for representatives of the Ukrainian services and administration, the studies of corruption cases and analyses of the reasons for the failure of investigations and the failure to enforce accountability for the perpetrators in order to assist personnel in anti- corruption roles to avoid repeating past mistakes;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 399 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Encourages Member States to expand their support to the EUAM’s digitalisation efforts related to the reform of Ukraine’s Civilian Security Sector via training and the provision of technologies that support data registry, human resource management and court filing procedures to assist in transparency, community trust building and countering corruption;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 401 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Encourages Member States to expand their support to EUAM digitisation efforts via trainings and provision of technologies that support data registry, human resource management and court filing procedures to assist in transparency, community trust building and countering corruption;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 408 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Calls on the Commission, the EEAS and the CPCC to ensure EUAM maintains prioritization on the reform of Ukraine’s National Security Service (SSU) to ensure greater oversight, less pre-trial investigative powers and detention centres, downsizing and demilitarisation of the SSU with a quarterly assessment on implementation once Bill 3196 is passed in the Verkhovna Rada;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 412 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Encourages Member States to implement more efficient intelligence sharing capabilities within and between CSDP missions and to give particular emphasis to enhanced collaboration and secondment of personnel from Europol and Interpol to CSDP mission headquarters to facilitate seamless intelligence sharing;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 413 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Implores Member States to advocate for EUMM physical access to the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia and strengthen their public reactions to provocations against the EUMM, especially detentions of EUMM border guards and ceasefire violations;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 421 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS and encourages Member States to contribute to the cooperation within the International Crimea Platform to address hybrid threats to the wider Black Sea region security posed by or related to Russia’s illegal occupation in Crimea and militarization of the Black and Azov Seas;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 423 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23 b. Encourages Member States to consider the establishment of a climate- specific EaP fund that includes cross- border and regional cooperation, protection of biodiversity, sustainable use of natural resources, research and education and a particular focus on capacity building in green technologies based on best practices in Member states;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 439 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Calls on the Commission to establish a structural dialogue with the Associated Trio (A3) countries of EaP;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 440 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25 b. Declares the will of the European Parliament Committees on Foreign Affairs and its Subcommittee on Human Rights to participate in the A3’s and willing EU Member States’ parliamentary activity on monitoring the situation in the territories of the A3 illegally occupied by Russia (Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria, Crimea and Donbas);
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 442 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 c (new)
25 c. Calls on the EEAS, MPCC, CPCC and CSDP HQ’s to foster a new culture of understanding between civilian and military partners based on enhanced institutional relationships and shared awareness and assessment in an effort to develop a comprehensive planning framework and culture;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 445 #

2021/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 d (new)
25 d. Encourages Member States to further strengthen military resilience of Ukraine through provision of defence weapons to Ukraine, including anti-ship, anti-aircraft and anti-tank weapons;
2022/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 26 a (new)
— having regard to Russia's illegal invasion and annexation of Crimea,
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 26 b (new)
— having regard to Russia's violation of airspace and maritime borders of member states,
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 26 c (new)
— having regard to China's increase in economic and military presence in the Mediterranean and African countries,
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 26 d (new)
— having regard to the threat of domestic and foreign terrorism, primarily from groups such as ISIS,
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 26 e (new)
— having regard to new technologies such as artificial intelligence, space capabilities and quantum computing which present new opportunities for mankind, but also create new challenges in defence and foreign policy that require a clear strategy and consensus among allies,
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 47 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the EU is facing new threats, including hybrid threats at the borders of EU Member States; new variants of the COVID-19 virus and the potential for renewed pandemics; fragile states on the European continent and in its vicinity, provoking migratory pressures and human rights abuses; Cyber-attacks and information manipulation. Corrosive capital flows; Weakening of disarmament efforts and international arms control regimes; Increasing threats to natural resources, energy insecurity, climate change, increased militarisation around the world and a still unstable neighbourhood, both in the East and in the South;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that NATO remains the cornerstone of collective defence for those Member States that are also members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation as explicitly recognised in the TFEU; believes that EU-NATO cooperation should be complementary and take full account of each of the two institution’s specific features and roles, and should not unnecessarily replicate or replace structures;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Considers that instability and unpredictability on the Union’s borders and in its immediate neighbourhood (North Africa, the Middle East, the Caucasus, the Balkans, Eastern Mediterranean, Russian aggression against Ukraine and Georgia, etc.), as well as in its extended neighbourhood(Sahel, Horn of Africa, etc.), pose both a direct and indirect threat to the security of the continent; stresses the inextricable link between internal and external security; acknowledges that active engagement in the neighbourhood is in the interests of the European Union;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that 2020 was dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which exposed our dependencies vis-à-vis the rest of the world; stresses that the EU must learn lessons from this with a view, in particular, to increasing its resilience and strategic autonomy, operational capabilities and capacity to act autonomously if need be, but preferably in cooperation with our partners;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the launch of the work on the Strategic Compass, which should be completed in March 2022; with a strong effort to coordinate with NATO’s new Strategic Concept; stresses that it is a beginning, not an end, and that it constitutes a major step towards a European Defence Unionincreasing defensive capacities of the Member States and making the EU a more prominent player within the Transatlantic security architecture;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the Strategic Compass must make it possible to strengthen the Union’s capacity to act as an increasingly credible strategic partner; stresses that this exercise must be regularly updated, must set out an ambitious and operational course – with a timetable for the implementation of decisions and monitoring mechanisms – and must enable the Union to have a coherent defence policy, a common strategic culture, a capacity to anticipate threats and provide a rapid and coordinated reaction and a capacity for autonomous resilience, to be able to mobilise resources on the basis of solidarity when a Member State is threatened and requests them, and ultimately to play a part in the protection of European citizens; also against terrorist threats; underlines the need to closely coordinate EU sanctions in this respect with NATO;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 138 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that the Union is currently deploying 11 civilian missions and six military missions and operations; recognises that these missions do not yet realize their full potential in security sector reform and require a revised mandate to ensure that effective training and operational capabilities are required to keep pace with the evolving threat environment to Europe’s East and South; recalls that only three of the military missions are executive missions; notes that these missions and operations are suffering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has limited their effectiveness;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Further calls upon the EU to keep its commitments in the Fourth EU- African Summit to support economic and political stability and to further support the capabilities of the African Standby Force; acknowledges that closer cooperation with existing regional forces such as the African Union, G5 Sahel Force and Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) as well as the US, are essential to successful operations in Africa;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 200 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes with satisfaction the results of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia); approves its extension for a perstresses the need for further prolongatiodn of two years; stresses the need for further reflection on CSDP commitments in the area; is concerned about the deterihe CSDP commitments in the area, as a strong presence is important to remain relevant as a regional actor; in the light of the current situation, a longer mandate extension would ensure stability and predictability, effectiveness of the mission; stresses that the situation is not evolving in a good direction for the EU; recognises that this mission can be enhanced by secure informating security situation in the region; on and communication channels to Member State capitals, improvement of open source intelligence gathering and analysis capabilities;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 218 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the launch of the CSDP operation in the Mediterranean, EUNAVFOR MED IRINI; stresses its key role in the implementation of the arms embargo; deplores the fact that, in 2020, it encountered many refusals to allow inspections; calls for a transparent communication from the European External Action Service (EEAS) on this issue; laments the fact that NATO, which is active in the area through Operation Sea Guardian, is unwilling to cooperate; encourages greater burden sharing and cooperation with NATO’s Operation Sea Guardian;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 248 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Is deeply concerned about the low force generation for operations and missions, and urges the Member States to address this matter as soon as possible; considers that third-country participation in CSDP operations and missions must always be in line with European interests and values; calls on the EU to provide staff in missions and operations with appropriate equipment and training to become more alert and more resilient under less permissive conditions; considers that third-country participation should be expanded when and where appropriate; special consideration should be given to including participation from recipient countries that hosted former CSDP operations;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 261 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Is concerned about the increasing information manipulation, disinformation and hybrid threats affecting several theatres, stemming mostly from Russia, China, but also other actors; calls for a structured response to these threats by CSDP missions;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 267 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for a strengthening of the Union’s command structures, in particular the Military Staff (EUMS) and the Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC), which must be provided with the requisite personnel, equipment and resources as soon as possible, and be able to exchange classified information safely, including with Member States and missions/operations; reiterates its calls for the creation of a European HQ for conduct of operationsclose coordination with NATO in order to avoid duplication and ensure greatest possible added value;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 303 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Supports the ambition of creating a ‘rapid entry force’; recalls the existence of battlegroups and the need to make them credible by conducting regular field exercises; deploresis concerned with the Member States’ lack of commitment to the battlegroups; criticises the fact that only one, led by Italy, is operational in 2021; lamentsis concerned with the weakness of the planning for 2022 and 2023;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 319 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the establishment of the European Peace Facility (EPF) in 2020 and calls for it to be made operational swiftly; stresses that the requisite equipment and training must be delivered in the relevant theatres of operation; undertakes to ensure coherence and complementarity between CSDP missions and operations, the Union’s financial instruments (NDICI) and the EPF; underline that the EPF should be used to effectively support EU’s partners in the Eastern Partnership that are facing threats from Russia, most notably Ukraine and Georgia;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 326 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Reaffirms its unwavering support to the Eastern Partnership countries, and in particular as regards their independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within their internationally recognised borders; condemns Russia’s direct and indirect involvement in armed conflicts, its illegal occupation of the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali region/South Ossetia, violent annexation of Crimea and occupation of certain parts of the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, as well as Russia’s military build-ups inside the EaP region or on its borders with the region; urges the EU to keep demanding Russia to engage constructively in the Geneva International Discussions and the Normandy Process, and to implement its obligations under the EU-mediated 12 August 2008 Ceasefire Agreement and the Minsk Agreements; encourages the EU to strengthen its engagement in peaceful conflict resolution throughout the EaP region;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 331 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Notes with concern the increasing militarisation of the Crimean peninsula and the attempts by the Russian Federation to destabilise the Black Sea region, with this situation having led to the recognition, at the NATO Summit in Wales in 2014, of the vulnerability of the eastern flank of the Alliance; calls for the EU to recognise the vulnerability of eastern European Member States as a means of strengthening European defence, and to develop, together with NATO, a comprehensive strategy for securing and defending the eastern flank;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 332 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. Welcomes in this regard Operation Atlantic Resolve and NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence on the European continent and recognises the importance of NATO troops in the effort to deter further Russian aggression and provide crucial support in the event of a conflict;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 333 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 d (new)
22d. underlines the need to closely monitor actions of private security and military companies (PSMC’s), notably the Russian Wagner Group which is increasing its global footprint in vulnerable areas including Africa, Latin America and Eastern Europe;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 377 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Recognizes the growing importance of cyber and automated intelligence capabilities, stresses that these provide threats to all the Member States and EU institutions, urges all EU institutions and Member States to continue to improve upon their cyber and automated technologies, further encourages cooperation on these technological advances;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 385 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Recognizes the growing importance of cyber and automated intelligence capabilities, stresses that these provide threats to all the Member States and EU institutions, urges all EU institutions and Member States to continue to improve upon their cyber and automated technologies, further encourages cooperation on these technological advances;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 388 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27b. Underlines the importance of achieving quantum computing capabilities and stresses the need to enhance EU-US cooperation in this area to ensure that quantum computing is first realized among partners sharing warm relations and supporting objectives;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 401 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Union to develop a space defence strategy, which is essential for its strategic autonomy in space; encourages the Union to improve its situational awareness and geo-intelligence support; stresses the importance of the Union having its own launchers; insists that the Union should lead the way in strengthening the increasingly contested area of international space law;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 405 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Notes the growing importance of space security and satellites, stresses the importance of the European Union Satellite Centre and commissions the agency to analyse and provide a report regarding the safety and/or vulnerabilities of the EU and Member State satellites to space debris, cyber-attack and direct missile attack;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 420 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Calls for the EU to address the consistent and growing threats to the protection and preservation of cultural heritage and clamp down on the smuggling of cultural artefacts, especially in conflict zones; notes that depriving societies of their cultural heritage and historical roots makes them more vulnerable to radicalisation and more susceptible to global jihadist ideologies; calls for the EU to develop abroad strategy to counteract such threats;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 444 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. LamentsIs concerned with the reduction in the amount of the EDF under the MFF, which makes coherence between Union defence initiatives even more necessary; stresses, in this regard, the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA); Considers that EDF should collaborate actively with NATO in order to facilitate transatlantic technological and industrial development in a manner that removes barriers and protectionism and ensures export licensing processes/technological transfer policies are harmonized among Member States; special consideration should be given to the development of a task force between EDA and NSPA/NCIA for developing a roadmap on identifying ideal equipment for procurement and to generate the best value on defence expenditure as well as the formulation of a ‘transatlantic DARPA’;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 547 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40a. Recognizes the growing political, economic, environmental, security and strategic value of the Arctic Circle, urges the Member States to continue cooperation with the Arctic Council on all issues of EU interest and to form a comprehensive strategy for the region;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 549 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 b (new)
40b. Condemns the recent use of Chemical Weapons by Syria, North Korea, Russia and terrorist organizations and maintains the view that the lack of accountability for such incidents undermine the international norm against chemical weapons and requires Member States to consider how best to respond to the use of chemical weapons, including how future use could be deterred, and whether Member States are adequately protected and how to strengthen the OPCW to ensure speedy and accurate attribution and effective response mechanisms;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 550 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 c (new)
40c. Reiterates its grave concern at the attempted assassination of Alexei Navalny as well as of Sergei and Yulia Skripal, by using a banned nerve agent Novichok, considered as use of a chemical weapons under the CWC (AM186); welcomes the sanctions imposed on Russian officials on 14 October 2020 in response to this blatant violation of international norms and of Russia’s international commitments;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 619 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Notes with serious concern the recent display of force and escalating tensions in the regional hotspots such as South and East China Sea and Taiwan Strait; underlines that the peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific regions is of great importance for the EU and its Member States; expresses grave concern over China’s continued military manoeuvers in the Taiwan Strait, including those aimed at Taiwan or taking place in Taiwan’s Air Defence Identification Zone; calls on the PRC to stop such military sabre-rattling that pose serious threats to the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and the Indo- Pacific region; reiterates that the relationship between China and Taiwan should be developed constructively through dialogues, without coercion or destabilizing tactics by either side; stresses the opposition to any unilateral action that may undermine the status quo of the Taiwan Strait and that any change to cross-strait relations must not be made against the will of Taiwan’s citizens;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 623 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Encourages Member States to continue to work with ASEAN countries in all aspects already agreed upon, further stresses the need to cooperate on economic manners and combatting terrorism;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 625 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 b (new)
45b. Recalls that China, together with other non-democratic countries, also remains a major threat to democracies in Europe through disinformation campaigns, in which they exploit the openness and freedom of expression to propose an authoritarian alternative to the democratic system; note that cooperation in the fight against disinformation is therefore in the interest of both the EU and Taiwan;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 627 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 c (new)
45c. Encourages the EU and the Member States to deepen cooperation with Taiwan in confronting disinformation from malign third countries, including the sharing of best practices, joint approaches to fostering media freedom and journalism, deepening cooperation on cybersecurity and cyber-threats, raising citizens’ awareness and improving overall digital literacy among the population in order to strengthen the resilience of our democratic systems; support intensified cooperation between relevant European and Taiwanese government agencies, NGOs and think tanks in this field;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 649 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
47a. Expresses grave concern at the continued escalations of tensions in the East and South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, including China’s increasingly provocative military manoeuvres aimed at Taiwan; calls for all parties concerned to resolve their differences through peaceful means to de- escalate the tensions and to refrain from taking unilateral action to change the status quo; underlines the importance of the peaceful development across the Taiwan Strait to maintain peace, stability and prosperity for China and Taiwan, and in the Asia-Pacific region, which remains of critical importance to the interests of the EU;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 670 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
50. Stresses that Parliament should be regularly informed and consulted on the implementation of PESCO, given its essential linkage with the various financial instruments of the CSDP, in particular the EDF, over which Parliament exercises scrutiny; calls for the closest possible access to PESCO for third countries who are also NATO Members, acknowledging that such countries' defence industries have expertise, related instruments and capabilities that EU Member's industries could benefit from;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 672 #

2021/2183(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50 a (new)
50a. Encourages that initiatives such as EDIDP, PESCO and EDF facilitate SME engagement by advancing efforts that support incubation and capital investment;
2021/10/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 468 #

2021/2182(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32 a. Notes with serious concern the recent display of force and escalating tensions in the regional hotspots such as South and East China Sea and Taiwan Strait; underlines that the peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific regions is of great importance for the EU and its Member States; expresses grave concern over China’s continued military manoeuvers in the Taiwan Strait, including those aimed at Taiwan or taking place in Taiwan’s Air Defence Identification Zone; calls on the PRC to stop such military sabre-rattling that pose serious threats to the peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and the Indo- Pacific region; reiterates that the relationship between China and Taiwan should be developed constructively through dialogues, without coercion or destabilizing tactics by either side; stresses the opposition to any unilateral action that may undermine the status quo of the Taiwan Strait and that any change to cross-strait relations must not be made against the will of Taiwan’s citizens;
2021/10/28
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the US remains the EU’s closest strategic partner and both parties must maintain the political will to strengthen the partnership when possible;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU and the US share a fundamental interest in shaping the international environment, and thus have the biggest potential to support one another in shaping the international environment in a manner consistent with democratic values;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 47 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the election of Joe Biden as President of the United States and Kamala Harris as Vice-President has created new opportunities to resetfurther the transatlantic relationship;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the Biden administration has declared its intention to re-establish close relations with the EU and other democratic allies; providing a renewed opportunity for both parties to fulfil their standing obligations to the international organizations to which they both belong and to ensure greater coordination and burden sharing across a wide spectrum of geopolitical issues moving forward;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the Biden administration has revaltersed some of the most damaging unilateral actions of the Trump administratithe US approach to multilateral institutions, enhancing the opportunity for the EU to synergize its efforts in strengthening the transatlantic bond;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas constructive dialogue is needed to address the transatlantic divergences giving the EU the opportunity to prioritize a transatlantic approach to addressing the growing challenges faced by Russia, China, Iran and North Korea;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas, while pursuing transatlantic cooperation in areas of shared interest, the EU should also foster its strategic autonomy in defence andto prioritize technological sophistication, streamline procurement practices and ensure interoperability while initiating a renewed call for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership that ensures stronger economic relations;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 77 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas the EU and the US have the largest bilateral trade and investment relationship and enjoy the most integrated economic relationship in the world creating a need for renewed efforts to secure a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership that ensures market access and overcomes challenges to regulatory cooperation;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for a new transatlantic agenda that privileges multilateral cooperation for a healthier world, the fight against climate change, promotion of peaceful resolution of conflicts and reform of economic governance, by putting the fight against inequalitiesour shared strategic goals such as bolstering our supply chain for medicines and reforming the WHO, lowering our dependency on external energy reserves, increasing investment in advanced technologies, fighting inequalities and collaborating where appropriate in the training and outfitting of local forces in the Southern neighbourhood and African continent at its centre;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 121 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recognizes the significant improvement of air quality within the US over the past few decades, largely driven by technological improvement and innovation in the energy sector;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Welcomes US input to reduce EU’s dependency on foreign energy sources and strengthening the EU’s diversification of energy sources;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #

2021/2038(INI)

3c. Expresses concern over the recent US decision to waive sanctions against Nord Stream AG and its CEO
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 138 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for strengthened interparliamentary cooperation between Members of the European Parliament and Members of Congress in different thematic areas that could enable the exchange of best practices on global, but also on shared, domestic challenges, such as addressing economic and social inequality, protection of human rights and democratic standards, universal health coverage, legislative convergence on AI and quantum computing, responsibility of online platforms and a just transition towards climate neutrality;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the stepping up of joint EU- US efforts on advanced technology development, specifically AI, machine learning, nano and bio-technologies to ensure a coordinated effort in addressing climate change, green technology, carbon adjustment, sustainable finance and biodiversity;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2021/2038(INI)

9. Calls for transatlantic leadership on health diplomacy, notably the reform of the World Health Organization and joint transatlantic effort to deliver equitable global access and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines, tests and treatments, in particular in lower-income countries, while safeguarding the vaccines as a global public good; insists on fostering cooperation to establish better procedures for preparing for future pandemics, including through a coherent and consistent clinical and regulatory approach complementary to global supply chains to ensure flexibility and resilience;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 182 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recognizes the US’s Operation Warp Speed that delivered vaccines in record time and encourages an exchange of best practices between the US and EU on vaccine rollout to ensure better preparedness and resilience in the face of a future pandemic;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 186 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for coordinated efforts to achieve ambitious commitments at the UN summits on pressing issues such as non- proliferation, conflict resolution, countering radicalization and terrorism and coping with climate change and safeguarding biodiversity in 2021;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 216 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the Biden administration’s announced commitment to re-engage with the UN Human Rights Council in an effort to implement the much needed reform of the HRC, signalling the US’s renewed intention to promote human rights globally;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Encourages the US to move towards the abolition of the death penalty, the reform of the criminal justice system, including through addressing systemic racism, and the end of all discrimination against LGBTQI persons; urges dialogue and exchange of best practices between the EU and US on promoting racial and gender equalitycontinue its internal dialogue between its respective administrations and civil societies regarding human rights issues such as the move towards the abolition of the death penalty or the reform of the criminal justice system;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 282 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines that the growing significance of Artificial intelligence and machine learning requires enhanced EU- US cooperation and that measures should be taken to advance cooperation among US and European tech companies in order to ensure partnering on development and application
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 283 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Encourages developing a set of common EU AI capabilities matched to a Member State’s operating concepts to bridge technical gaps to ensure that Member States lacking the relevant technology–industry expertise or the ability to implement AI systems in their ministries are not left behind;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 284 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Underlines the importance of achieving quantum computing capabilities and stresses the need to enhance EU-US cooperation in this area to ensure that quantum computing is first realized among partners sharing warm relations and supporting objectives;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 285 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 d (new)
18d. Urges EU-US cooperation in regulating 5G implementation to comply with strict security standards that secures national and international information networks capable of encrypting communications;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 286 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 e (new)
18e. Recognises the emerging threat of Hyper war and the unique requirements this will place on defence architectures and the need for a high-tech industrial base that the EU-US relationship is well placed to address;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 301 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the common need to defend global democracy against rising authoritarianism and neo-Marxism, also within the transatlantic community, by, inter alia, fostering inclusive social and economic policies that address the root causes of inequalities and fighting extreme nationalist views that provide a fertile ground for far-right and far-left movements to thrive;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 308 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Further calls upon the EU & US to jointly provide economic, political and operational support with existing regional forces based in Africa such as the African Union, G5 Sahel Force and Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 310 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Underlines that EU & US must synergize their efforts to combat terrorism and radicalization and ensure that efforts made are supported by necessary resources and commensurate with the threat that it poses; Both partners should strive to improve current practices of intelligence-sharing among Member States with particular emphasis on achieving better, common situational awareness in key areas including emerging safe havens and terrorists’ use of EDTs, as well as hybrid tactics;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 311 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Encourages great EU-US collaboration in de-radicalization and counter-terrorism efforts that include establishing joint training activities, shared counter-terrorism courses, exchange programs for officers, tactical drills and education initiatives;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 312 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Encourages EU-US information sharing to mandate that high value data collected by any national security agency is transmitted within 24 hours of recording to a central system and that it is permitted to cover non-EU nationals;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 313 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 e (new)
20e. Encourages EU and US to create a publicly accessible ‘No Visit List” that identifies organizations whose charitable status has been removed due to links with terrorism as well as ideological radicals who pose a threat to the security of a country and who will be prohibited from entering the EU or US;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 314 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 f (new)
20f. Encourages EU-US collaboration in establishing a specialised team of lawyers trained to prosecute terrorism cases, while judges selected to hear terrorism cases should have the background and training to preside over them;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 345 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the EU and US to collaboratively address the consistent and growing threats to the protection and preservation of cultural heritage and cultural smuggling, especially in conflict zones. Urges the embracing of a strategy that includes: robust public awareness campaigns, universal condemnation of trafficking in unprovenanced antiquities; establishment of a single code of conduct in protection of cultural sites; fostering of greater cooperation among different law- enforcement agencies that includes immediate information-sharing among national intelligence agencies; increase cooperation between law enforcement and the art and archaeological communities.
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 357 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for a comprehensive EU-US dialogue on China that should address the areas of divergence, such as the Comprehensive Agreement on Investments, and explore possibilities for EU-US cooperation with China in multilateral frameworks on common challenges, such as climate change, cyberspace, arms control, non- proliferation and emerging disruptive technologies;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 369 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Recognises that China’s acquisitions of intellectual property and technological advances by leading research centres are often used to propel its military aims and therefore the EU should work to develop a long-term strategy to counter China’s military-civil fusion (MCF) strategy in Europe;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 370 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Recognises that EU & US should coordinate on issue’s where China’s actions are contrary to Euro-Atlantic security interests; prioritization should be given to challenges in the cyber, hybrid, EDT, space, arms control, and non- proliferation areas;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 372 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 c (new)
24c. Is concerned by China’s economic coercion against Member States and third countries; supports the idea of collective economic defence via collaboration with likeminded democracies against China’s economic coercion;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 373 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 d (new)
24d. Is concerned with the close ties between the CCP and industry in China, particularly security companies; recommends that Member States undertake an internal audit of procurement practices to ensure that products integrated into their national networks and defence institutions are free of technologies coming from companies in China;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 396 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Considers that the EU and US must coordinate their dual-track approach of deterrence and dialogue with Russia within parameters agreed at the Wales and Warsaw Summits
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 397 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Considers that unity between EU and US is the best policy to deter Russia’s destabilising and subversive actions in Europe; calls upon Member States to coordinate their positions and actions vis- à-vis Russia and to speak with one unified voice, considers that the EU & US should seek to use all means available at the international level to effectively counter Russia’s continued interferences, ever more aggressive disinformation campaigns and gross violations of international law that threaten security and stability in Europe;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 398 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 c (new)
25c. Calls on the EU and US to act timely and with resolve against disruptive actions of Russian intelligence services on the territory of the EU; recommends that Member States enhance counter intelligence services cooperation and information sharing;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 399 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 d (new)
25d. Calls on the VP/HR and the Council to devise a new strategic approach for the EU’s relations with Russia, which must better support civil society, strengthen people-to-people contacts with the citizens of Russia, draw clear red lines for cooperation with Russian state actors, use technological standards and the open internet to support free spaces and restrict oppressive technologies, and demonstrate solidarity with the EU’s Eastern Partners, including on security issues and peaceful conflict resolution; underlines that any dialogue between the EU and US with Russia must be based on the respect of international law and human rights;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 415 #

2021/2038(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. WelcomNotes the recent engagement of the US in the negotiations on a revival of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) as a cornerstone of a global non- proliferation regime and a foundation for de-escalation in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf region; calls for renewedurges that a revised JCPOA be an improved version that resolves key concerns such as sunset clauses, inspection/verification obstructions and caps further enrichment capabilities; believes that growing concerns of Iran’s missile development, violations of human rights and sponsorship of radical groups throughout the region cannot be ignored in a revived JCPOA; supports a transatlantic efforts to meaningfully revive the Middle East Peace Process, leadingthrough direct negotiations that leads to a viable two-state solution;
2021/05/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
— having regard to the report of the Reflection Group Appointed by the NATO Secretary General of 25 November 2020 entitled ‘NATO 2030: United for a New Era’,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
— having regard to the G7 Foreign and Development Ministers’ Meeting Communiqué of London, May 5, 2021;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
— having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and other UN human rights treaties and instruments,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 c (new)
— having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China and EU-China relations, in particular those of 21January 2021 on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong and of 17 December 2020 on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR), and having regard to its previous recommendations relating to Hong Kong, in particular that of 13 December 2017 to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) on Hong Kong, 20 years after handover;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
— having regard to the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
— having regard to the Protocol of 2014 to the International Labour Organization (ILO)Forced Labour Convention of 1930, which has not been signed by China,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 d (new)
— having regard to the Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy of June 2016,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 e (new)
— having regard to the European Union Maritime Security Strategy,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 f (new)
— having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) concluded on 10 December 1982 and in force since 16 November 1994,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. Whereas the Peoples Republic of China is a unitary, one-party communist state, governed by the Communist Party of China (CPC), committed to Marxism– Leninism; whereas as such it does not share democratic values such as individual freedom, freedom of speech and freedom of religion;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. Whereas in the recent years the Communist Party of China has taken an increasingly aggressive approach to exerting influence in democracies around the world, efforts recently expanded under the cover of COVID-19 responses, by utilizing economic leverage and technological superiority, state-direction of the economy, and export of authoritarianist information operations, and an expanding digital toolkit, in an aim to bolster autocrats and contributing to the erosion of democracy worldwide,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Supports greater dialogue and cooperation with China on peace and security, sustainable development, science, technology and innovation, environmental issues, space and aerospace;contribution to humanitarian assistance and disaster relief and environmental issues, including ocean protection, overfishing, pollution, unchecked resource extraction, animal trafficking,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Points out that some fields of cooperation such as ITC, space and aerospace, can have a dual use application and can be used against Chinese citizens and against the West;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Regrets that the open dialogue with China and trust necessary for building a transparent relationship will be difficult bearing in mind the PRC's growing espionage activities, malign influence activities and cyber attacks targeting the EU and EU Member States;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 155 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. emphasises the universal and unified character of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and reaffirms UNCLOS’s important role in setting out the legal framework that governs all activities in the ocean and the seas. In this regards calls on China to refrain from any unilateral actions that could escalate tensions and undermine regional stability and the international rules-based order and express serious concerns about reports of militarisation, coercion, and intimidation in the region,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 179 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Stresses that the promotion of and respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law has to remain at the centre of the relationship between the EU and China, in line with the EU’s commitment to upholding these values in its external action and China’s expressed interest in adhering to them in its own development and international cooperation;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 235 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. States its support for UN to carry out legal investigations into alleged genocide and crimes against humanity taking place China, in particular in the Xinjiang region and Tibet;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 253 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Stresses that the PRC, as a permanent member of the Security Council of the UN, but also as a signatory of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, is a State part of the international human rights system, within and beyond the UN; while having this in mind, condemns in the strongest possible terms the scale and scope of the human rights violations by the PRC, in particular on the Uighur minority in the Xinjian region, which fulfil the definition of genocide as defined in the 1948 Genocide Convention, and stresses that other State Parties of the 1948 Genocide Convention have the legal obligation to take measures to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide, including by enacting relevant legislation and punishing perpetrators;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 280 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. expresses its serious concerns about China's belligerent attempt to change the status quo in the East and South China Seas by force, unilaterally by repeatedly intruding into the territorial seas, conducting “confrontation exercises”, also jointly with Russian Federation, building and militarizing artificial islands, flouting the international law of the sea with excessive maritime claims, attempting to restrict the freedom of navigation and overflight and using civilian vessels to expand China’s presence in disputed areas,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 299 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point c – point i (new)
i) to take into account Beijing’s new strategic intent and capabilities and directly address areas where Beijing’s current objectives—and the levers Beijing deploys to pursue them—either complement or conflict with EU's interests,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 300 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point c a (new)
(c a) Limit Beijing’s ability to exploit EU's openness for China’s gain,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 302 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point d
(d) ensuring that the President of the Commission is present at the BRI annual forum to ensure that the decisions taken by EU Member States involved in the BRI initiative are in line with EU policies and interests;deleted
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 309 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point d a (new)
(d a) cooperate closely with like-minded partners to set high standards that promote sustainable finance, environmental preservation, fair business conditions, transparency and high labour standards especially in regions of strategic importance,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 313 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point e – point i (new)
i) to review EU's regional strategic, in particular for Africa and Indo-Pacific region, to bolster the rule of law and human rights in regional countries facing growing influence from China,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 314 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point e a (new)
(e a) to work collectively to foster global economic resilience in the face of arbitrary, coercive economic policies and practices and to review how the PRC fulfils obligations and responsibilities commensurate with its global economic role and membership in international organizations such as the WTO,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 316 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Is deeply concerned at the situation in the East China Sea, where Beijing has escalated tensions by declaring its own air defence identification zone (ADIZ), conducted military exercises in an attempt to intimidate Taipei, and pursue an aggressive and sustained campaign to undermine Taiwan’s democratic process and popular support for the current Taiwanese government through disinformation campaigns and other influence operations and that continuation of such practices makes Beijing an unreliable actor which actions need to be halted in order to save the international rule based order, stability and peace in Indo-Pacific region,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 346 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Is concerned by the assertive and, at times,unacceptable and aggressive diplomatic pressure from the Chinese authorities; underlines that EU institutions can in no way bow to pressure or censorship from Chinese channels; is concerned by the activities of the Confucius Institutes in the EU;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 355 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Expresses its solidarity with the Czech Republic after Chinese Foreign Minister's threats to the Czech Senat Speaker; is of the opinion that threats to Member States or any other country are unacceptable;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 366 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Expresses grave concern over China’s expansionist policies in the South China Sea, East China Sea and Taiwan Strait, especially China’s continued military provocation aimed at Taiwan, with Chinese military aircraft intruding Taiwan’s Air Defence Identification Zone on regular basis; underlines that the status quo across Taiwan Strait, freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region are of critical importance to the EU and its Member States; reiterates strong opposition to any unilateral actions that could escalate tensions and undermine the status quo; encourages that cross- strait relations should be developed constructively, without destabilising initiatives or coercion by either side, and that any change to cross-strait relations must not be made against the will of Taiwan’s citizens;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 369 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Urges the Commission to come up with concrete proposals and action to facilitate Taiwan’s full participation as an observer in the meetings, mechanism and activities of the World Health Organization, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC);
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 383 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines the importance of the EU remaining vigilant about China’s changing role and growing global influence in multilateral organisations and to ensure better coordination among the Member States and towards combining the strength of global liberal democracies in order to respond to this development; like-minded partners in order to respond to this development aimed at replace global governance with a system based on authoritarian governance principles and eroding U.N. mechanisms for human rights accountability; notices that the Chinese government’s greater engagement with international and multilateral institutions, such as the United Nations, World Trade Organization, World Health Organization, Interpol, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Telecommunication Union or International Civil Aviation Organization aims to reshape norms, standard and practices globally in order to foster China's long-term geopolitical strategy and economic interests; regrets that Chinese domestic censorship, exercised now, among others, at the United Nations forum, aims at manipulating procedures to minimize scrutiny of China's conduct, in particular in the case of the situation of ethnic Uyghur Muslims and other Turkic Muslim minorities,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 389 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. reviews China's actions aimed at undermining the global trading system by violating the rules and norms of that system, and then using its market size to evade or undermine international enforcement efforts; calls for addressing China's unfair trade practices through better use of the WTO rules and procedures,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 391 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21 b. Regrets Chinese support to the most oppressive regimes worldwide, in particular in Syria, Iran and North Korea, but also in Venezuela and Cuba,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 401 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. calls for a stronger cooperation and establishing a system which will end decades long China's pracitces of aggressive and irresponsible acts in cyber space, including refraining from conducting or supporting cyberattacks, forced technology transfers, cyber- espionage and cyber-enabled intellectual property theft,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 409 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Fostering open strategic autonomyresilience and reducing dependence
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 412 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines that investment and trade conditionality by itself is not enough to counter Chinese assertiveness; finds that the EU should increase strategic autonomy, predatory technology acquisitions and technonationalist industrial policies; finds that the EU should foster resilience by addressing other dimensions of the EU- China relationship, notably digital and technological sovereignty and supply chain security; in this regard calls to take into account enhanced rules requiring Chinese firms to undergo security screening before investing in certain strategic sectors, including IT, telecommunication, energy, transport, in order to expose the CCP and government ties—such as Huawei and ZTE, which refused to provide similar information in the past and are not willing to abide high transparency standards,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 436 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Considers it necessary to conclude a Bilateral Investment Agreement with Taiwan in parallel with the CAI and in line with the EU's One China policy, which would ensure that stability is safeguarded in the region and the right to Taiwan’s democratic existence is reaffirmed;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 439 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30 a. urges the Commission to move forward with the Bilateral Investment Agreement with Taiwan and start the impact assessment, public consultation and scoping exercise with Taiwan before the end of 2021;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 482 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35 a. calls on the EU to gather a coalition of states and non-state actors to counter Beijing's attempts to limit a free and open global internet,
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 483 #

2021/2037(INI)

35 b. points out the need to introduce independent from CPC's influence programmes to study Chinese culture, language and politics, for example by closer contacts with Taiwanese academia and society;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 484 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 c (new)
35 c. supports NGOs and institutions, including regional infrastructure investment transparency platforms, which asses and control transparency and accountability of the PRC's sponsored projects and investments, especially under its flagship Belt and Road Initiative;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 489 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Calls for defence cooperation among the Member States to be strengthened and for the Member States to invest in stronger cooperation with other democratic players such as the US, the UK, Canada, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 493 #

2021/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Calls for defence cooperation among the Member States to be strengthened and for the Member States to invest in stronger cooperation with other democratic players such as Japan, India, South Korea, Australia and, New Zealand and Taiwan;
2021/05/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 240 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) Contracting Parties to the Treaty establishing the Energy Community45 or Parties to Association Agreements including Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas are committed to decarbonisation processes that should eventually result in the adoption of carbon pricing mechanisms similar or equivalent to the EU ETS or in their participation in the EU ETS. to the EU ETS should benefit from CBAM exemption with regard to the goods originating in those countries provided that certain conditions are satisfied. Those third countries should develop a roadmap and commit to implement an effective system of monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions, a carbon pricing mechanism similar to the EU ETS, and should commit to achieving carbon neutrality. That exemption should be withdrawn if there are reasons to believe that the country in question does not fulfil its commitments. The Union is committed to providing those third countries with financial support for the adoption of carbon pricing mechanisms similar to the EU ETS, the deployment of decarbonisation technologies, and the implementation of other measures aimed at achieving climate neutrality. __________________ 45 Council Decision 2006/500/EC of 29 May 2006 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty (OJ L 198, 20.7.2006, p. 15).
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 343 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11
11. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to amend the lists in Annex II, Sections A or B, depending on whether the conditions in paragraphs 5, 7 or 9 are satisfied.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 345 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11
11. The CommissiIf a third country is committed to decarbon is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to amend the lists in Annex II, Sections A or B, depending on whether the conditions in paragraphs 5, 7 or 9ation processes that should result in the adoption of emission trading system similar to the EU ETS, the importation of goods originating in that country shall be exempt from the application of the CBAM, provided all of the following conditions are satisfied.:
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 346 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11
11. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to amend the lists in Annex II, Sections A or B, depending on whether the conditions in paragraphs 5, 7 or 9 are satisfied.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 347 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11
11. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to amend the lists in Annex II, Sections A or B, depending on whether the conditions in paragraphs 5, 7 or 9 are satisfied.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 348 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11
11. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to amend the lists in Annex II, Sections A or B, depending on whether the conditions in paragraphs 5, 7 or 9 are satisfied.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 349 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. (a) the third country is a party to the Treaty establishing the Energy Community and/or a party to Association Agreement, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area with the Union;
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 350 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. the third country has put in place an effective system of monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions;
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 351 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. the third country has submitted a roadmap to the Commission, containing a timetable for the adoption of measures to implement the conditions set out in points (d), (e), and (f);
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 352 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 d (new)
11d. third country is committed to adopt an emission trading system similar to the EU ETS;
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 353 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 e (new)
11e. the third country has committed to climate neutrality and has accordingly formally formulated and communicated, where applicable, to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change a long-term low greenhouse gas emissions development strategy aligned with that objective, and has implemented that obligation in its domestic legislation;
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 354 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 11 f (new)
11f. the third country has, when implementing the roadmap pursuant to point (c), demonstrated substantial progress towards the alignment of domestic legislation with Union law in the field of climate action on the basis of that roadmap. The implementation of an emission trading system by 1 January 2030 is conditional upon third country’s receipt of the financial, institutional, and expert support from the Union.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 355 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12
12. The Union, may conclude agreements with third countries with a view to take account of carbon pricing mechanisms in these countries in the application of Article 9. A third country satisfying the conditions set out in paragraph 11, points (a) to (f), shall be listed in Annex II, Section C, of this Regulation, and shall submit two reports on the fulfilment of the conditions pursuant to paragraph 7, points (a) to (f), one before 1 July 2025 and another before 1 July 2029. By 31 December2025 and by 31 December 2029, the Commission shall assess, notably on the basis of the roadmap pursuant to paragraph 11, point (c), and the reports received from the third country, whether that third country continues to respect the conditions set out in paragraph 11.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 359 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. A third country listed in Annex II, Section C of this Regulation, shall be removed from that list if the Commission has reasons to consider that the country has not shown sufficient progress to comply with one of the requirements listed in paragraph 11, points (a) to (f), or if the country has taken action incompatible with the objectives set out in the Union climate and environmental legislation.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 360 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 28 to amend the lists in Annex II, Sections A, B or C, depending on whether the conditions in paragraphs 5, 7, 9, 11 or 13 are satisfied.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 361 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 12 c (new)
12 c. The Union, may conclude agreements with third countries with a view to take account of carbon pricing mechanisms in these countries.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 636 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 2(10), 2(114), 18(3) and 27(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 639 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 2(10), 2(114), 18(3) and 27(5) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 641 #

2021/0214(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 7
7. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 2(10), 2(114), 18(3) and 27(5) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and to the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
2022/02/08
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 11 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that a new model of EU trade policy has a major role to play in the transition towards more sustainable agri- food systems, in line with the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the need to fully revise the EU trade policy in order to be consistent with the European ambition on the farm to fork and biodiversity strategies; Highlights that the farm to fork strategy will not be credible if trade policies on agriculture products are not modified in depth.
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the EU internal market is the world’s biggest importer and exporter of agri-food products; is convinced that the EU should use this position to set the benchmark in terms of standards for sustainable food systems, based on the precautionary principlscience, environmental protection and animal welfare;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 39 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls the Commission to ensure consistency and coherence between the measures envisaged by the Farm to Fork Strategy and the Common Agriculture and Fisheries Policies, the Trade Policy, the EU’s Biodiversity Strategy for 2030,as well as other related EU Policies and Strategies in accordance with the principle of better regulation;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Stresses that an EU Promotion Policy including all EU agricultural products and different models of farming, can actively contribute to this benchmark setting on the sustainability of agricultural products;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 46 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Highlights that it is essential to give substance to the objective of the Farm to Fork Strategy to put European food security and independence at the centre of the future EU trade policy and of any bilateral trade agreements."
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2020/2260(INI)

3. Believes that sustainable production should become further promoted as a key characteristic of EU agri-food products, expanding the concept of quality to social and environmental aspects;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 77 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to pursue in a realistic and pragmatic way the objectives of the Farm to Fork Strategy through the development of Green Alliances in all relevant forums, including the UN Food Systems Summit 2021;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 80 #

2020/2260(INI)

4a. Underlines that the Commission should base legislative proposals on scientifically-sound ex-ante impact assessments describing the methods of calculation of the targets and the baselines and reference periods of each individual target, after consultation with the Member States; the cumulative effects of the legislative proposals should be taken into account;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 83 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. In light of the Farm to Fork Strategy ambitious objectives, calls on the European Commission to review the fundamental principles of the MERCOSUR agreement as far as agriculture and environment protection are concerned; highlights the imbalance in the agriculture and sustainability chapters and stresses that safeguard measures are insufficient to prevent market distortions or environment degradation.
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 94 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises the importance of enforceable Trade and Sustainable Development chapters in trade agreements to promote biodiversity, foster more sustainable agri-food production and stop EU-driven global deforestation; urges support for developing countries to promote food security and alignment with European standards for sustainability; urges to engage in a constructive dialogue with governments and stakeholders globally;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 105 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises that European production standards must be respected when it comes to trade and imports from third countries. Imported food that does not comply with relevant EU environmental standards should not be allowed on EU markets in order to maintain a level playing field;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 108 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Stresses that access to new and innovative technologies are a key factor in keeping European agriculture competitive on a global market and in maintaining food security at global level;
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 135 #

2020/2260(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for a reinforcement in European ports border controls in order to prevent new animal and plant pests and diseases; Stresses the need for a better control and accountability of customs rights and import taxes from Morocco agriculture products.
2021/02/09
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 a (new)
— having regard to the European Deterrence Initiative which has deployed an additional 4000 - 5 000US troops to Europe and represents one of the largest financial and material contributions to European security in decades, beginning with a budget of $4.8 Billion USD, the US recently requested $6.5 Billion USD for FY 2019,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 b (new)
— having regard to NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence (EfP) in the Eastern flank of the Alliance with four multinational battlegroups in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, led by the U.S., United Kingdom, Canada and Germany respectively,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 c (new)
— having regard to the EfP's South- East European component ‘Tailored Forward Presence’ which includes both land forces and aerial support as a multinational brigade that coordinates training in Romania and Bulgaria,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 d (new)
— having regard to the Transatlantic Defence Investment Cooperation (TADIC) formally commissioned in 2000 to address fragmentation of the security and defence industry within Europe and resolve the large differences of investment in defence capability, technology, export controls and technology transfer regimes among Member States,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 e (new)
— having regard to the studies published by NATO’s Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence which outline the increasingly capable social media bots, AI-created fake images, video and even automated weapons platforms Russia utilises,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 f (new)
— having regard to the enormous impact on potential EU defence capabilities of the departure of the UK, one of the most effective European military powers from the EU,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 g (new)
— having regard to Russia's illegal invasion and annexation of Crimea,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 h (new)
— having regard to Russia's violation of airspace and maritime borders of member states,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 i (new)
— having regard to the Intermediate Range Nuclear Force (INF) Treaty, Russia's repeated violations including the development and deployment of 9M729 ground-launched cruise missile systems and the resulting US withdrawal from the Treaty,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 j (new)
— having regard to China's increase in economic and military presence in the Mediterranean and African countries,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 k (new)
— having regard to the threat of domestic and foreign terrorism, primarily from groups such as ISIS,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 27 l (new)
— having regard to new technologies such as artificial intelligence, space capabilities and quantum computing which present new opportunities for mankind, but also create new challenges in defence and foreign policy that require a clear strategy and consensus between EU & NATO,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 35 a (new)
— having regard to NATO’s role in Rapid Air Movement during the COVID- 19 crisis,
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the COVID-19 pandemicaftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid pace of technological change is having a significant impact on international relations and has further exacerbated existing global tensions and security challenges with profound implications on the global balance of military power;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reaffirms its previous commitment to the EU’s ambitions in the field of security and defence, and reiterates the EU’s ambition to be a global actor for peace and security; underlines the fact that NATO remains indispensable and must remain the primary actor for the security and collective defence of its members and the transatlantic community as a whole;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the significance of and exceptional contributions made by NATO’s various Partner countries to Euro-Atlantic security; urges stronger coordination and effective division of labour between the EU and NATO in cooperating with third countries with a particular emphasis on NATO’s Enhanced Opportunities Partner (EoP) countries;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Acknowledges that close cooperation should also take place with third countries and through the command and planning structures of NATO; such cooperation will provide vital capabilities, such as strategic lift, essential to operations in the European periphery;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the importance of achieving quantum computing capabilities and stresses the need to enhance EU-NATO cooperation in this area to ensure that quantum computing is first realized among partners sharing warm relations and supporting objectives;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 134 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Notes the growing importance of space security and satellites, stresses the importance of the European Union Satellite Centre and requests the agency to analyse and provide a report regarding the safety and/or vulnerabilities of the EU and Member State satellites to space debris, cyber attack and direct missile attack;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 213 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recognises the important cooperation between the EU and NATO in the Western Balkans, notably through the EUFOR Althea mission and the important role that NATO integration has played in the region by stabilising and preparing these countries for eventual EU integration;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 247 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Consider that the EU and NATO must coordinate their dual-track approach of deterrence and dialogue with Russia within parameters agreed at the Wales and Warsaw Summits; recognises that NATO should maintain regular contact with Russia in areas of immediate threat to the security of the Euro-Atlantic, including in arms control, military transparency, and maintaining channels of communication to avoid misunderstandings that could escalate into major crises;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Expresses that EU & NATO need to respond to Russian’s threats in a clear, strong and coherent way without a return to “business as usual”;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 253 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Consider that EU & NATO should coordinate their positions in developing an agenda for international arms control in key areas of EDT with military application;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 255 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 d (new)
13d. Considers that EU & NATO should work together to ensure Russia’s return to compliance with existing arms control agreements;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 269 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Recognises that EU & NATO should coordinate on issue’s where China’s actions are contrary to Euro- Atlantic security interests; prioritization should be given to challenges in the cyber, hybrid, EDT, space, arms control, and non-proliferation areas;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 270 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Recognises that China’s acquisitions of intellectual property and technological advances by leading research centres are often used to propel its military aims and therefore EU & NATO should work together to develop a long-term game plan to counter China’s military-civil fusion (MCF) strategy in Europe;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 271 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 c (new)
14c. Urges EU-NATO cooperation in regulating 5G implementation to comply with strict national security standards that secures national and international information networks capable of encrypting communications;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 272 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 d (new)
14d. Consider jointly establishing a C4ISRnetwork with a state of the art command and control systems in the Asia Pacific, in cooperation with Allies throughout Asia, to ensure rapid response capability in addressing security crises in the Asia-Pacific;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 273 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 e (new)
14e. Recognises that China has thousands of precision warheads tied to a sophisticated command and control system; Considers China’s stockpiling of an enormous and technologically advanced arsenal of ballistic missiles such as the Dong Feng-26have advanced unhindered by the absence of any international Treaty;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 296 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recognises the role that NATO’s Capacity Building Initiatives (CBI) play in contributing to Middle East stabilization via training missions to local security forces and the support the EU has provided by assuming civilian responsibilities in certain CBI initiatives;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 300 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Considers the important role the EU can play in supporting NATO’s Open Door Policy by maintaining close political and operational synergy with its applicant countries, namely Ukraine and Georgia;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 303 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Joint Training & Exercises - Summit looks to enhance training, exercises and strategic communications to counter hybrid threats while supporting continued EU & NATO cooperation in maritime operations;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 304 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 d (new)
16d. Encourages further progress in the common set of proposals, particularly the ongoing interaction with the new EU Hybrid Fusion Cell and NATO’s Hybrid Analysis Cell in sharing situational awareness and analysis, tactical and operational cooperation between Operation Sea Guardian and EUNAVFOR MED Sophia and ongoing cooperation between EU’s Computer Emergency Response Team and the NATO Computer Incident Response Capability;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 305 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 e (new)
16e. Stresses the significance of military mobility and the EU’s roles in providing the legislative and infrastructural reforms required to ensure speedy movement of Member State forces across Europe; urges resolution to the border crossing &VAT laws authorizing foreign militaries unhindered country access, along with infrastructural redevelopment of bridges, roads and runways;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 306 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 f (new)
16f. Supports further modernization of NATO’s Command Structure and commends the new Joint Force Command for the Atlantic, Enabling Command Centre and Cyber Operations Centre;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 307 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 g (new)
16g. Encourages joint EU-NATO synergy in supporting Joint Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (JISR) via training and education, doctrine and procedures and network environment;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 320 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Further calls upon the EU & NATO to jointly provide economic, political and operational support with existing regional forces based in Africa such as the African Union, G5 Sahel Force and Economic Community of West African States(ECOWAS);
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 321 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Encourages EU-NATO cooperation to cooperate with ASEAN countries in all aspects already agreed upon, further stresses the need to cooperate on economic manners and combatting terrorism;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 322 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Recognises the growing political, economic, environmental, security and strategic value of the Arctic Circle, urges EU-NATO cooperation to explore cooperation with the Arctic Council on all issues of common interest and to form a comprehensive strategy for the region;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 323 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 d (new)
17d. Takes into consideration that EU & NATO should enhance its situational awareness across the High North and the Arctic and create a new strategy focusing on broader deterrence and defence plans; the strategy should include plans for ensuring freedom of navigation in the High North and adjacent bodies of water, including the North Atlantic, as well as provisions for addressing aggressive moves by state actors;
2021/04/27
Committee: AFET
Amendment 348 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Highlights the role AI can play in providing advanced training and pre- deployment unit-level preparation for EU or NATO-led forces during peacetime to ensure a rapid yet smooth transition into conducting operations.
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 349 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Urges EDA, CDP, CARD and NDPP to utilize autonomous software to assist with maintenance, logistics management, and targeting of offensive and defensive systems to ensure that a CSDP force is successfully integrated with autonomous, unmanned ground, air and sea vehicles to provide a standardised, and ever increasing, level of operational competence and consistency of execution;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 350 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19c. Recognises that machine-learning systems can use sensor data, entire technical libraries and advanced models to accurately predict and prevent equipment failure and should thus be integrated into our procurement plans;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 351 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 d (new)
19d. Recognises the emerging threat of Hyper war and the unique requirements this will place on defence architectures and the need for a high-tech industrial base if the EU and NATO are to preserve an adequate deterrence and defence posture or simply maintain a comparative advantage against adversarial actors;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 352 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 e (new)
19e. Encourages developing a set of common EU AI capabilities matched to a Member State’s operating concepts to bridge technical gaps to ensure that Member States lacking the relevant technology–industry expertise or the ability to implement AI systems in their defence ministries are not left behind;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 353 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 f (new)
19f. Stresses the concern posed by Russia’s harmonisation of highly disruptive propaganda and kinetic operations while committing to investments in military-relevant AI;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 354 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 g (new)
19g. Encourages that initiatives such as EDIDP, PESCO and EDF facilitate SME engagement by advancing efforts that support incubation and capital investment;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 355 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 h (new)
19h. Considers that EDF should collaborate actively with NATO in order to facilitate transatlantic technological and industrial development in a manner that removes barriers and protectionism and ensures export licensing processes/technological transfer policies are harmonized among Member States; special consideration should be given to the development of a task force between EDA and NSPA/NCIA for developing a roadmap on identifying ideal equipment for procurement and to generate the best value on defence expenditure as well as the formulation of a ‘transatlantic DARPA’;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 367 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Considers that Member States should isolate part of their 2%-20% contribution goals to include a dedicated minimum expenditure towards research and development within their defence budgets;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 369 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Strongly encourages the foundation of an Advisory Group for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) to the NATO Industrial Advisory Group (NIAG)to advise EU & NATO on how to keep pace with technological change; A key objective for these efforts should be to encourage the development of an AI- focused agenda for R&D within the Alliance;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 387 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on Member States and the Commission to ensure the EDA provides a specific framework to pragmatically and practically drive forward requirement and specification, promote more effective and efficient project management and ensure rigorous delivery regimes and timetables
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 389 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Calls on EDA to ensure that any efforts it takes to enhance Member States operational capabilities take place in close conjunction with NATO’s Defence Investment Division and the NATO support and Procurement Agency;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 390 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. Recommends Member States incorporate new technology thinking in defence planning and do it constantly and consistently while placing a strong emphasis on systematic, independent and robust ‘red-teaming’;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 391 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 d (new)
22d. Urges the EU’s PESCO and promotion of pooling and sharing, as well as NATO’s Smart Defence, Connected Forces Initiative and Defence Investment Pledge be reinforced by an EU-NATO Capability Action Plan that seeks to better forge synergies, harmonisation and efficiencies into the relationship between suppliers and end-users;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 392 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 e (new)
22e. Recommends Member States and EU’s various defence agencies implement, as a matter of urgency the prioritization of developments in new technologies, specifically AI, machine learning, military application of nano and bio-technologies and developing counter weights to the threats posed by CBRN weapons and new missile technologies;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 393 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 f (new)
22f. Urges future defence plans to meet strategic rather than satisfy political needs;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 394 #

2020/2257(INI)

22g. Recommends an audit be taken by both the EU and NATO to better understand what European forces need, where the key shortfalls are found and the level of resource-waste caused by redundant fixed assets and duplication of effort;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 395 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 h (new)
22h. Recommends the establishment of a Current Assets Framework be established that would purposively focus on the more efficient use of existing assets and capabilities;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 396 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 i (new)
22i. Establish a Future Requirements Framework that identified the operational capabilities that Member States need and how best to obtain them by 2030;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 397 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 j (new)
22j. Recommends Member State forces establish regular joint exercises and training campaigns to ensure that forces participating in CSDP or NATO Crisis Management operations are properly trained, equipped and rapidly deployable;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 414 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls for regular special summits with the participation of all NATO and EU Heads of State and Government to maintain trust and understanding at the highest levels, and expresses its long-term vision for an EU- NATO Partnership Council; underlines the principle of inclusiveness;
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 430 #

2020/2257(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Underlines that EU& NATO must synergize their efforts to combat terrorism and radicalization and ensure that efforts made are supported by necessary resources and commensurate with the threat that it poses; Both organizations should strive to improve current practices of intelligence-sharing among Member States with particular emphasis on achieving better, common situational awareness in key areas including emerging safe havens and terrorists’ use of EDTs, as well as hybrid tactics.
2021/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 84 #

2020/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Warns that the crisis has highlighted EU vulnerabilities including in the field of security and defence and in particular in preparedness and responsiveness to CBRN, cyberattacks and disinformation;
2020/10/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 377 #

2020/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that only a more united EU, backed up by sufficient and credible military capacities, will be able to conduct a strong foreign policy, and; calls for heightened vigilance that any economic downturn as a result of COVID-19 does not expose critical defence industrial and research capacities to opportunistic foreign investment and thereby threatening the security of supply in strategic sectors; believes that the VP/HR should receive a stronger mandate in speaking on behalf of the EU;
2020/10/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 424 #

2020/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines the important role of the armed forces during the COVID-19 pandemic and believes that a more in-depth joint operation and coordination of member states’ armed forces within existing frameworks - such as the European Medical Command - or within new frameworks - such as military hospital trains - could lead to greater efficiency and contribute to the EU’s preparedness to fight pandemics; recognises the need to review the EU’s security and defence strategies to develop strategic autonomy, to become better prepared and more resilient to the new and hybrid threats and technologies that have made the nature of warfare less conventional and challenge the traditional role of the military, as well as for a future in which Russia and China are becoming more assertive; stresses that the future Strategic Compass on security and defence should reflect these developments and take account of the broader geopolitical implications of COVID-19; stresses that the future Strategic Compass on security and defence should reflect these developments and take account of the broader geopolitical implications of COVID-19; believes that, given the new political balance and a potential worsening of the international security environment following COVID-19, the EU defence budgets must not be cut;
2020/10/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 433 #

2020/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that the emerging Strategic Compass on European Defence needs to take account of the broader geopolitical implications of COVID-19 and to address the full spectrum of threats such as a new pandemic, CBRN, foreign interference, including disinformation or cyber-attacks that are not deterred by borders; urges the EEAS to work on the resilience and sustainability of CSDP missions and operations during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic; insists on the importance of maintaining the continuity of CSDP missions and operations in such context; Calls for a full review of the impact of COVID-19 on the preparedness, readiness, force generation, safety of personnel and continuity of CSDP Operations and Missions, in order to ensure the EU’s operational presence and effectiveness is not affected by the crisis or future similar scenarios;
2020/10/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 559 #

2020/2111(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Highlights that the EU’s partners in the Sahel-Saharan and Horn of Africa regions are facing the unprecedented consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to their ongoing struggle against armed terrorist groups, including jihadists;
2020/10/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
— having regard to a joint statement on Belarus of EPP, S&D, Renew Europe, Greens/EFA and ECR groups in the European Parliament of 17 August 2020,
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas despite the fundamental restrictions on basic freedoms and human rights that remain in Belarus, the EU policy of critical engagement with Belarus has produced some results in the form of signed agreements and increased cooperation; whereas future relations between the EU and Belarus will be defined in the Partnership Priorities to be agreed by both sideEU and new legitimate, democratically elected authorities in Belarus;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the people of Belarus share common European heritage and culture, while directly neighbouring three EU Member States; whereas situation in Belarus may have direct impact on the EU;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the OSCE ODIHR International Election Observation Mission noted an overallnone of either the parliamentary or presidential elections held in Belarus from 1994 to date have been free and fair, but despite these harsh undemocratic conditions the people of Belarus clearly voted for a change, after more than two decades of oppression; whereas recent presidential elections were neither free nor fair and even more than the previous ones were marred with disregard for the fundamental freedoms of assembly, association and expression during the 2019 parliamentary elections, whichand took place after a limited amount of campaigning and within an extremely restrictive environment that did not provide for a meaningful or competitive political contest overall;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the 2020 presidential elections have thus far followed the same pattern as the parliamentary electionssimilar pattern as previous elections; whereas after publication of falsified results, Belarusian people immediately organised peaceful protests, which were suppressed by brutal force, which resulted in thousands of protestors being arrested, tortured, wounded, and some even killed; whereas the United Nations human rights investigators alarmed on 01/09 that they had received reports of hundreds of cases of torture, beatings and mistreatment of anti-government protesters by police in Belarus and urged the authorities to stop any such abuse;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas human rights and democracy in Belarus have been deliberately and brutally restricted by the Belarusian authorities over the past decades, while representatives of the opposition, civil society and media in the country have been regularly arrested or otherwise persecuted;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas the Belarusian regime seeks to intimidate and to disperse the Coordination Council of Belarus by targeting its members and launching a criminal case against them;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E d (new)
Ed. whereas Belsat TV channel, which is officially registered in Poland, so far has not been registered in Belarus, while its activities are under constant pressure and attacks, including brutal detentions of its journalists and fines imposed to its contributors amounting to USD 101,791 as of 18 June 2020;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas 26 years in power or Lukashenka had been marked by policies of undermining sovereignty and independence of the country and weakening of Belarusian identity, heritage and culture;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 162 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) acknowledge territorial integrity of Belarus and support the sovereignty of Belarus against pressure from the Russian Federation for deeper integration and remind Belarus that the European Union is open to further development of relations with the country both bilaterally and within the Eastern Partnership framework if Belarus meets conditions linked to democracy, the rule of law, international law, human rights and fundamental freedoms;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) deplore the involvement and support of the Russian Federation in aiding the Lukashenko regime to legitimize fraudulent elections and to brutally crush peaceful demonstrations; condemns the Kremlin’s hybrid war against the Belarusian people; support the will of the Belarusian nation by restraining the Kremlin’s interference, including by blocking Russia’s access to SWIFT system and introducing targeted sanctions, which could prevent likely scenario of full annexation of Belarus by the Russian Federation; take a brave decision to stop the North Stream 2, which otherwise would serve as an instrument reinforcing the authoritarian regime in Russia and would finance Russia’s hybrid war in Belarus and elsewhere;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 221 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) pay close attention to the presidential election campaign and insist that a lack of progress in conducting elections according to international standards and further crackdowns against the opposition will have direct adverse effects on relations wicall for holding new and transparent Presidential and Parliamentary elections in Belarus that would meet the democratic standards and call on the EU, OSCE, CoE to engage in dialogue with the Belarusian civil society with a view to launch a new electoral process, under the supervision of a new Electoral Commission, a body that can be trusted by all the parties including international observers, under the the EUight international scrutiny;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 226 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) deny recognition of the results of the elections held in Belarus on 9 August 2020 and Alexander Lukashenko as a legitimate leader President of Belarus; accordingly, call on him to respect the decision of the people of Belarus and peacefully step down;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 231 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(eb) applaud the Belarusian people for their courage and determination and to strongly support their desire for democratic change and freedom and basing their country’s future on principles of democracy, rule of law and human rights, so as to ensure freedom, independence, sovereignty and prosperity of the Republic of Belarus;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 233 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
(ec) warn the regime against any attempts to use national, religious, ethnic and other minorities as a proxy target diverting attention of the society from the election fraud and subsequent massive protests and repressions; to condemn denying the return to the country of the head of the Catholic Church of Belarus, archbishop Tadeusz Kondrusiewicz; likewise, to warn against creating false narratives about the external threats to Belarus and its territorial integrity, allegedly emanating from the EU and its Member States; express deepest concern about using such narratives as justification for military activities, including the movement of Belarusian forces in Grodno region towards the border with Poland and Lithuania;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 236 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e d (new)
(ed) deplore persecution of the members of the opposition Coordination Council and call the authorities to enter into the dialogue with the protestors in order to end the violence and repressions and prepare a new elections;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 248 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) condemn efforts of the Belarusian regime to deny entrance to the country for Belarusians critical towards it, as well as independent journalists, human rights workers, as well as representatives of international community, including Members of the European Parliament;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 254 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) urge to halt the use of violence against peaceful protesters, immediately release all the political prisoners and all members of civil society arbitrarily detained before, during and after electoral campaign; ensure full restoration and respect for human rights and freedoms, including the freedom of press, freedom of assembly and other political and civil freedoms in Belarus and deplore the appalling acts of violence, cruel repressions and torture against peaceful protesters and detainees, and call for full international investigation of these crimes;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 264 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g b (new)
(gb) uphold the decision of EU’s foreign affairs ministers and the European Council to blacklist those responsible for violence and fake presidential elections and impose individual sanctions against Belarusian officials who are liable for or have contributed to the falsification of the results of the presidential elections in Belarus and are responsible or have contributed to violations of civil and human rights; this list should be constantly updated and extended according to the level of crimes committed by Lukashenko regime;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 270 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g c (new)
(gc) note that China's president was the first to congratulate Lukashenka after the elections; to express concerns over increasing Chinese investments in strategic infrastructure and warn about the effect of dependency it might create for Belarus;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 289 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i
(i) condemn the ongoing intimidation and persecution of opposition figures, including presidential hopefuls, civil society activists and independent journalists; strongly condemn the suppression of internet and media, road blockades, and intimidation of journalists in order to stop the flow of information about the situation in the country as well as denial of access to Belarus for international media, members of parliament or government of democratic community;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 297 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) commend actions taken by workers of numerous factories and institutions throughout the country that joined the protests in various ways, including strikes and provide necessary support for those of them who were punished by the regime for exercising their democratic rights;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 300 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i b (new)
(ib) welcome numerous acts of solidarity with the people of Belarus, including fundraising, charity and humanitarian assistance; in this regard condemn stopping of humanitarian aid transport organised by "NSZZ Solidarnosc";
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 304 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(ja) approve the European universal human rights sanctions (European Magnitsky Act) as a regime providing, at the EU level, for restrictive measures, including entry bans and freezing of funds, against individuals liable for violations of human rights and freedoms and responsible for other crimes;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
(la) propose to immediately establish an impartial, international mediation mission for Belarus aimed at helping to resolve the political crisis and regulate the conflict situation in the country; in this regard welcomes the initiatives of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya to establish national council to lead the negotiations on further peaceful transition of Belarus to democracy, including free and fair elections, and warns against any attempts at criminalizing the body and persecuting its members;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 361 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
(oa) offer the alternative of strengthened and much closer cooperation with Belarus in case democratic changes, including new elections, become reality;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 362 #

2020/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o b (new)
(ob) work together with the European Commission in order to develop a comprehensive programme for Belarus after the new presidential elections are held, which would allow Belarus to transition towards a free market economy and an open democratic state;
2020/09/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 1 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to the NATO Treaty, and the Defence Investment Pledge made by the Heads of State at the NATO Summit in Wales 2014,
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 b (new)
- having regard to the existing commitments of 21 Member States to spend 2% of their GDP on defence and 20% of their defence budget on procurement of new technologies in order to maintain a qualitative edge in Allied military hardware,
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 c (new)
- having regard to the NATO Industrial Advisory Group (NIAG) and the Transatlantic Defence Technological and Industrial Cooperation (TADIC),
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas PESCO’s long-term vision is to achieve a coherent full-spectrum force package available to the Member States; whereas PESCO should enhance the EU’s capacity to act as an international security provider by enhancing interoperability in order to protect EU citizens and maximise the effectiveness of defence spending; whereas the cost of non-Europe in security and defence is estimated to be more than EUR 100 billion per year;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the COVID-19 pandemic has shown the consequences of the EU not having enough competence when it comes to health care; whereas, by the same analogy, it would make sense to establish an EU common defence strategy in order to be able to respond to an attack on the EU’s borders and territories; whereas PESCO constitutes an important step towards achieving the objective of a common much needed investment in offsetting the capability shortfalls that are essential to credible deterrence and defence;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas according to Council decision 2017/2315, establishing PESCO enhanced defence capabilities of the Member States will also benefit NATO provided that duplication is avoided and interoperability is prioritized, while strengthening the European pillar within the alliance and responding to repeated calls for stronger transatlantic burden- sharing;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas PESCO creates a binding framework between the pMS, which committed themselves to jointly investing, planning, developing and operating defence capabilities within Union framework in a permanent and structured manner by subscribing to 20 binding commitments in five areas set by the TEU; whereas these commitments should constitute a move from mere defence cooperation towards thefull integrationroperability of Member States’ defence forces; whereas despite these binding commitments, no effective compliance mechanism for PESCO is in place; and PESCO projects have not been implemented in a manner reflective of industrial capacity, duplication concerns or budgetary constraints of pMS;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the pMS do not pay enough attention to the 20 binding commitments to which they have subscribed, and not enough progress has been achieved with regard to significantly embedding PESCO into national defence planning processes casting serious doubt over the capacity of pMS to finalize PESCO projects;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas PESCO was originally conceived as an avant-garde, comprising the Member States willing and able to upgrade their cooperation in defence to a new level of ambition; whereas the fact that there are 25 pMS means that PESCO is at risk of being constrained by the ‘lowest common denominator’ approach amplifying the widespread free rider problem in European defence spending;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas work on the first three waves of PESCO projects has led to the pMS proposing 47 projects; whereas the current list of projects lacks coherence, strategic ambition and does not adequately address priority shortfalls as identified by the pMS; whereas one of these projects has been stopped in order to avoid unnecessary duplication; whereas other projects did not make sufficient progress or are at risk of being stopped, and around 30 projects are still in the ideation and preparatory phase casting serious doubt on the efficacy of this initiative;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital W
W. whereas the participation of third countries in individual PESCO projects might be in the strategic interest of the European Union, particularly in the cases of the United Kingdom, United States and Canada;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Y
Y. whereas the governance of PESCO is led by pMS, and therefore eventually leads to the insufficient coordination and overall consistency of the projects; whereas this should constitute grounds for the extension of the mandate of the PESCO secretariatmaking further access to financial support conditional upon the level of progress achieved;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 196 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) define the Union’s strategic vision, by, inter alia, implementing the level of ambition defined by the 2016 EU Global Strategy in the ongoing work of the Strategic Compass and, strengthen PESCO’s operational dimension to ensure that its outputs are functional and add value to ongoing or future operational readiness;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 236 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ensure that PESCO is effectively used as an instrument to reach EU defence integration as a common goal, in line with the ambition for greater EU Strategic Autonomy-NATO cooperation;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 243 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ensure that PESCO is treated as a Union institutions sui generis, as is the case with the European External Action Service (EEAS), which would require amending the Financial Regulation8 in order to include PESCO, with a specific section in the Union budget; recognise that Parliament, jointly with the Council, exercises legislative and budgetary functions, as well as functions of political control and consultation as laid down in the Treaties; _________________ 8deleted OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 253 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i
(i) incorporate directly into the PESCO project cycle the link between PESCO and EDIDP/EDF; imposea commitment to dedicate ample resources during the research and development phase that ensures that duplication concerns and operational shortfalls are offset and that the link between PESCO and EDIDP/EDF reflects the emphasis on the research and development stage by imposing the documentation of each project, before selection on the budgetary side;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 265 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k
(k) ensure that future key land, sea, air and other platforms for the armed forces of the Member States are brought under PESCO or are at least closely connected to itutilized to ensure PESCO efforts are complementary to existing capabilities and used in a manner that resolves existing shortfalls and offsets overhead expenses;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 277 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l
(l) consider, as part of the reform of the EU Battlegroup system, to bring it under PESCO in order to increase its operational capacity, modularity and agility;deleted
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 300 #

2020/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) consider giving CDP a more binding character;deleted
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 317 #

2020/2080(INI)

(t) establish an EU Council on Defence based on the existing EDA ministerial Steering Board and the PESCO format of EU Defence Ministers, in order to guarantee the prioritisation of resources, and the effective cooperation and integration among the Member States;deleted
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 150 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that until 31 December 2020, the United Kingdom is obliged to contribute to the financing of the European Defence Agency, the European Union Institute for Security Studies, and the European Union Satellite Centre, and to the costs of Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) operations in which it participates;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 288 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. RegretNotes the fact that the UK negotiating objectives published on 27 February stated that foreign policy will be determined only within a framework of broader friendly dialogue and cooperation between the UK and the EU; that the UK is showing no ambition for relations with the EU in the field of foreign policy, security and defence as these were explicitly not covered by the UK mandate and therefore do not form part of the negotiations on future relations;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 292 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Highlights the fact that the COVID 19 pandemic has illustrated the importance of military capacities and assets, with European armed forces playing a crucial role in support of civilian efforts in tackling the pandemic, while fulfilling their core missions; emphasises that this pandemic has demonstrated the importance of strategic autonomy of the EU and European defence cooperation to protect European populations in times of emergency and to foster the resilience of Member States; considers that mechanisms should be put in place to enable prompt cooperation between the Union and the United Kingdom in the face of future crises of a similar nature and scale; is of the view that drawing the lessons of the COVID19 pandemic, European military medical services should form an information exchange and support network to foster broad European resilience in times of emergency and crisis; considers that the participation of the UK in any such future European military medical network would be mutually beneficial;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 323 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Underlines the fact that the EU is an important partner for the UK in foreign and security policy, as the need for common responses to address foreign, security and defence policy challenges is crucial toare necessary for both sides; encourages the exchange of information and intelligence as well as close cooperation in the areas of counter- terrorism, space policy, cyberwarfare and chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) defence; recalls that exchanges of classified information must be organized within a specific framework;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 359 #

2020/2023(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29a. Calls on the Commission and the External Action Service to regularly inform the European Parliament on the process of political dialogue with the UK and on the main aspects of the information exchanges on CSDP and crisis management between the EU and the UK;
2020/05/28
Committee: AFETINTA
Amendment 7 #

2020/2013(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the UN and the wider international community to undertake all necessary efforts to ensure that the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in military affairs and the use of AI-enabled systems by the military stay within the strict limits set by international law and international humanitarian law (IHL); recognizes that the primary guarantor of the Euro-Atlantic security is NATO and that an international consensus related to AI regulations must be made in close cooperation with Member States, the North Atlantic Council and like-minded partners as the US, UK, Canada or Japan;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2020/2013(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that states, parties to a conflict and individuals, when employing AI-enabled systems in warfare, must at all times adhere to their obligations under the applicable international law and remain accountable for actions resulting from the use of such systems; recalls that AI machines can under no circumstances be held accountable for intended, unintended or undesirable effects caused by AI- enabled systems on the battlefield and therefore human oversight in the application of AI-enabled systems in combat must be maintained;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2020/2013(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that not all members of the international community will follow the regulatory human-centric approach devised by the union and that authoritarian states will devise a counter framework that will pursue, at the expense of Member States, to deliver military advantages and superiority within the AI domain;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2020/2013(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Urges the Member States to track and assess the development of AI technologies, particularly military and surveillance, within authoritarian states that avoid compliance with EU led regulations, to avoid a scenario in which our societies, militaries and institutions fall vulnerable to hybrid warfare;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #

2020/2013(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on Member States to serve as the deciding force for the basis of any agreement, using the international legal precedents in practice for CDSP, NATO and individual command structures to ascertain how best to develop any regulations for AI-enabled systems in the battlefield;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2020/2013(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that any international legal framework for AI must take into consideration the more pressing developments taking place in quantum computing which represents the most revolutionary change in operational capability in conflict since the advent of atomic weaponry and thus urges that the advancement of quantum computing technologies and a viable legal framework for them should be apriority for the Union and Member States;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2020/2013(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that in tactical scenarios, AI techniques such as reinforcement learning, which allows machines to share their experiences and optimal solutions among themselves have proven to be a critical asset in military campaigns, leading to the evolution of a highly optimized, robust mission intelligence that is effective at fulfilling objectives set by military command and are in compliance with existing IHL principles;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
(3 a) The Union understands hybrid campaigns to be ‘multidimensional, combining coercive and subversive measures, using both conventional and unconventional tools and tactics (diplomatic, military, economic, and technological) to destabilise the adversary. They are designed to be difficult to detect or attribute, and can be used by state and non-state actors’. The internet and online networks allow State and non-State actors to conduct aggressive action in new ways. They can be used to hack critical infrastructure and democratic processes, launch persuasive disinformation and propaganda campaigns, steal information and unload sensitive data into the public domain. In the worst cases, cyber-attacks allow an adversary to take control of assets such as military systems and command structures. Such large-scale cybersecurity incidents and crises at Union level must be adequately prepared for and protected against via joint training exercises as they have the potential to invoke Article 222 TFEU (the 'solidarity clause').
2021/06/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
(14 a) In view of the development of a secure connectivity system, building on the European quantum communication infrastructure (EuroQCI) and the European Union Governmental Satellite Communication (GOVSATCOM), in particular the implementation of GALILEO GNSS for defence users, any future possible development should take into account the advent of ‘hyperwar’ which merges the speed and sophistication of quantum computing with highly autonomous military systems that have the capacity to devastate society and thus Member States must ensure that the protection of entire electronic communications infrastructure such as space, land and submarine network systems are prioritized.
2021/06/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #

2020/0359(COD)

(40 a) Member States should consider an active cyber defence programme to be part of their national cybersecurity strategy that incorporates regular joint training exercises between Member States and across international organisations. Such a programme should provide a synchronised, real-time capability to discover, detect, analyse, and mitigate threats. Active cyber defence operates at network speed using sensors, software and intelligence to detect and stop malicious activity ideally before it can affect networks and systems.
2021/06/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 40 b (new)
(40 b) Member states should consider the recently released ten-point plan of the Russian Ministry of Defence that places artificial intelligence (AI) at the core of Russian military modernization, driven by AI consortia across government, industry and academia that includes an active wargaming AI military application.
2021/06/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 46 #

2020/0359(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 43 a (new)
(43 a) Since the exploitation of vulnerabilities in defence sector may cause significant disruption and harm, cybersecurity of defence industry require special measures to ensure the security of the supply chains, particularly entities lower in supply chains, which do not require access to classified information, but that could carry serious risks to the entire sector. Special consideration should be given to the impact any breach could have and the threat of any potential manipulation of network data that could render critical defence assets useless or even override their operating systems making them vulnerable to hijacking.
2021/06/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas in its previous annual report, Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to formally suspend accession negotiations with Turkey;deleted
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 99 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern that Turkey’s continuous and growing distancing from European values and standardWelcomes the European Council conclusions thas brought EU-Turkey relations to a historical low point, having deteriorated to such an extent that it requires both parties to profoundly reassess the current framework of relations;t offer Turkey a renewed and broad positive agenda
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 126 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned that, over the years, the lack of progress in Turkey’s convergence has now transformed into a full withdrawal, marked by a stark regression in three main areas: backsliding on the rule of law and fundamental rights, adopting regressive institutional reforms and pursuing a confrontational foreign policy; is further concerned by the fact that this regression has increasingly been accompanied by an explicit anti-EU narrative; calls, in this context, on Turkey to reassess the sincerity of its commitment to the EU path, as an indispensable component of the viability of the entire accession process;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that, since Parliament’s last report, the situation, far from improving, has deteriorated even further; firmly insists,Firmly insists that the accession negotiations with Turkey form the most effective way to pursue the refore, on the formal suspension of accession negotiations with Turkey, in order forquired reforms in Turkey and calls on both sides to review in a realistic manner the appropriateness of the current framework and its ability to function, or, if necessary, to explore possible new models for future relations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 187 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the current lack of understanding between the EU and Turkey, but reaffirms its firm conviction that Turkey is a strategic neighbour and a NATO ally with which the EU wishes to have the best possible relations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 208 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses its will to strengthen and deepen mutual knowledge and understanding between Turkish and European societies, combating all manifestations of social, religious or cultural prejudice; expresses its full commitment to continue supporting Turkey’s independent civil society in whatever circumstances and framework of relations that the future may bring; believes, nevertheless, that the accession process would still beremains the most powerful tool to exercise normative pressure on the Turkish government and the best framework to sustain the democratic and pro-European aspirations of Turkish society; stresses that a purely transactional relationship will hardly contribute to the advancement of Turkey towards a more democratic model;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 355 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Condemns Turkey's decision of 10 July 2020 to convert Hagia Sophia in Istanbul into a mosque; fears that the decision would fuel mistrust, promote renewed divisions between religious communities and undermine efforts at dialogue and cooperation; calls on the Turkish government to reverse its decision;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 385 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Urges Turkey to protect the rights of all minorities and vulnerable groups, including women, LGBTI people and ethnic and religious minorities, including Christians;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 496 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Notes the importance for both the EU and its Member States and Turkey of maintaining close dialogue and cooperation on foreign policy and security issues; encourages cooperation and further alignment on foreign policy, defence and security issues, including counter-terrorism cooperation;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 523 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Recalls that Turkey is a longstanding member of the NATO alliance and sits at a key geostrategic location for maintaining regional and European security; notes that the EU and Turkey continue to cooperate on issues of (military) strategic importance within the NATO framework;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 541 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the Eastern Mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns Turkey’s illegal activities in Greek and Cypriot waters, which violate both the sovereign rights of EU Member States and international law; expresses its full solidarity with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threatStresses that the door should be left open for the modernisation of the Customs Union, which would be beneficial for both parties and would keep Turkey economically and normatively anchored to the EU;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 574 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Reiterates the importance of good neighbourly relations; calls on Turkey, in this connection, to step up efforts to resolve outstanding bilateral issues, including unresolved legal obligations and unsettled disputes with its immediate neighbours over land and maritime borders and airspace, in accordance with the provisions of the UN Charter and with international law;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 658 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Believes that it is high time to review the EU’s relations with Turkey and to define a comprehensive, unified and coherent strategy for the medium to long term, among all EU institutions and Member States, in order to revitalise the accession process and the effective implementation of the needed reforms;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D j (new)
Dj. whereas joining NATO in 2020 marks a clear step towards greater stability, interoperability and defence integration into the Euro-Atlantic community, advancing their potential for eventual EU accession;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D l (new)
Dl. whereas the Conference on the Future of Europe and the participation of all Member States can assist the EU accession aspirations of the Western Balkans countries;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Urges the authoriall political parties to sustain consensual efforts to strengthen democratic consolidation and the transformation process, fight against corruption, and restore the rule of law, while improving the climate for media and civil society;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 e (new)
9e. Takes into consideration the further actions North Macedonia has adopted relating to security as stated in the Commission report on North Macedonia 2020; stresses that one of the most important problems the EU faces is the fight against terrorism; stresses the importance of continue to take measures against terrorism;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 e (new)
9e. Urges North Macedonia to continue its efforts in addressing the concern of returning foreign fighters along with the concern of foreign direct investment from third countries promoting radicalisation in various communities throughout North Macedonia;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the country’s efforts in improving cooperation on managing migration and addressing the needs of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants; recalls the need to establish a viable mechanism for managing irregular migratory flows, as migration is one of the main problems in the EU and North Macedonia is one of the main transit routes for irregular movements, ensuring international protection and combating people smuggling networks;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 171 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Welcomes North Macedonia’s political, operational and logistical support to Frontex and the Border and Coast Guard services of Member States, urges North Macedonia to fully implement its bilateral treaties so it can further its joint exercises in this area of cooperation;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Welcomes the investigations taken against prolific smuggling rings; stresses that there is a considerable need for further action by local officials and intelligence sharing with EU law enforcement agencies;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 174 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. Welcomes the advance in investigations since 2018 taken against organised crime, especially regarding smuggling and human trafficking;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 233 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 b (new)
37b. Welcomes the recent announcement of North Macedonia in joining the Alexandroupolis Energy Project and encourages greater cooperation with Member States in improving energy security across the region;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 263 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 c(new)
39c. Welcomes North Macedonia’s commitment to the ‘Clean Network’ initiative alongside Bulgaria and Kosovo in eliminating long term threats to data privacy and security by using only ‘trusted vendors’ in the development of its 5G technology and urges its neighbours to follow this example;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 270 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. ICommends the continued and standing contributions of North Macedonia to ongoing CSDP operations and Euro-Atlantic security. Recognises the professional conduct of the Army of North Macedonia and invites North Macedonia to continue contributing to the EU crisis management operations and increasing its alignment with the Common Foreign and Security Policy;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 275 #

2019/2174(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 a (new)
42a. Commends the continued and standing contributions of North Macedonia to ongoing CSDP operations and Euro-Atlantic security. Recognises the professional conduct of the Army of North Macedonia and welcomes continued cooperation in this field;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 22
— having regard to the EU-Western Balkans summits in the framework of the Berlin Process of 5 July 2019 in Poznań and of 10 November 2020 in Sofia,
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas each enlargement country is judged individually on its own merits, and it is the speed and quality of reforms that determine the timetable for accession; whereas pursuant to Article 49 TEU, any European country may apply to become a member of the Union provided that it adheres to all of the Copenhagen criteria and the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms, human and minority rights, and upholds the rule of law;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas Montenegro has continued to build a good track record in implementing the obligations of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA);
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the EU mobilised EUR 38 million in immediate support for the Western Balkans to tackle the health emergency caused by coronavirus; whereas up to EUR 3 million from that sum was allocated to Montenegro to support its supply of medical devices and personal equipment, such as ventilators, laboratory kits, masks, goggles, gowns, and safety suits;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the EU agreed on the reallocation of EUR 374 million from the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance to help mitigate the socio-economic impact of COVID-19 in the region; whereas EUR 50 million from that sum was allocated to Montenegro;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the Commission adopted a package of EUR 70 million under the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA II) to help fund the access of Western Balkans countries toCOVID-19 vaccines procured by EU Member States;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the active engagement and appropriate inclusion of the Western Balkans countries in the Conference on the Future of Europe; is of the opinion that their contribution should be taken into account as they are committed to become Member States of the Union in the future;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Expresses deep concern over the Judicial Council’s interpretation of the Constitution, which condones the unlawful reappointment of court presidents for more than two terms;deleted
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 69 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. WAlthough welcomes the fact that some progress has been made in the fight against organised crime, in particular as regards stronger capacity and professionalism of the police, encourages Montenegro to continue its efforts in this area, in particular through combating mafia, involved notably in cigarette smuggling, drug and arms trafficking as well as illegal gambling, and tracking its links to local politicians and police officers; underlines that systemic deficiencies in the criminal justice system remain and need to be addressed as a matter of priority;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines that media literacy and media freedom are key to combating disinformation; calls for the strengthening of European cooperation with Montenegro on addressing disinformation, and cyber and hybrid threats; underlines that Montenegro is under strong and unwavering hostile propaganda pressure exerted by Russia, aiming - among other goals - to reduce the support of the population for the NATO Membership;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 111 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes progress on the protection of LGBTI rights and the adoption of the law on same-sex partnershipsMontenegro’s efforts to strengthen minorities’ rights protection;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. CommendWelcomes Montenegro for it's commitment to inclusive regional cooperation, and the constructive role it plays in the Western Balkans region, and welcomes its active participation in numerous regional initiatives;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 128 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Underlines the strategic importance of Montenegro's NATO Membership and calls on the government to work towards strengthening cooperation with the Alliance and increasing support for it among the population;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 137 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. CommendWelcomes Montenegro’s full alignment with the EU’s common foreign and security policy and its active participation in civilian missions under the common security and defence policy (CSDP); in particular, welcomes its ability to overcome foreign provocations, including disinformation campaigns orchestrated by Russia and China; encourages it to cooperate in the field of resilience to foreign interference and cybersecurity with both the EU and NATO;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 144 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. CommendWelcomes Montenegro’s progress on and renewed commitment to international police cooperation, and encourages it to continue its efforts to cope with the migratory pressure, by further developing its international cooperation on readmission and raising its capacity to prosecute migrant-smuggling networks;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Calls on the Commission to support Montenegro’s efforts to reduce unemployment, seriously impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular in the tourism sector, that accounts, directly and indirectly, for more than 20% of Montenegro’s GDP; notes with concern that in the first eight months of 2020, the number of tourist arrivals to Montenegro decreased by almost 80% year-to-year due to travel restrictions and virus-related concerns;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 177 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls onWelcomes the Commission and the Council's decision to include Montenegro in joint EU procurement for vaccinations, and to allocate a sufficient amount of COVID-19 vaccines to the citizens of all Western Balkan countrie; calls on the Commission for a fair distribution of COVID-19 vaccines among the Western Balkan countries, taking into consideration each country’s pandemic situation and its individual needs;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 205 #

2019/2173(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 c (new)
36c. Encourages Montenegro to precede its much needed investments in infrastructural projects by robust feasibility studies so that they can be economically viable; warns Montenegro of a clear risk that the realisation of road and energy infrastructure projects in cooperation with unreliable foreign investment partners may represent to the country’s sovereignty and strategic interests;
2021/03/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the EU's enlargement policy contributes to strengthening the security and stability of the Western Balkan region of which Albania is part;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that progress in accession under the revised enlargement methodology depends on lasting, in-depth and irreversible reforms across fundamental areas, in particular the rule of lawjustice and the fight against corruption and organized crime;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 116 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the creation of anti- corruption bodies and the fact that sustained investigakes notes of the progress achieved in anti-corruption legislations; are being carried outcknowledges that in-depth investigations by the newly established Special Anti-Structure Against Corruption and Organiszed Crime Structure (SPAK), and indictments(SPAK) are beongoing handed down by the Anti- that the Corruption and Organiszed Crime Courts, and underlinre issuing indictments, and stresses the need to maintain their independence and effectiveness in the fighting against impunity; at the same time he points out that all this requires a commitment in terms of financial, technical and human resources for its complete implementation;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 149 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Reminds Albania of its calls for further improvements to be made in the education and health, and the employment rates and living conditions of Roma and other ethnic minorities;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the EU’s security environment is vulnerable to external pressure that prevents the EU from exercising its sovereigntywhich already is taking place in the form of hybrid warfare, including hostile propaganda from Russia and other actors, as well as increasing threat from radical terrorist groups;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #

2019/2136(INI)

Ga. whereas interference from external forces pose a great threat to the stability and security of the Europe Union;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that at a moment when competing powers are increasingly challenging the rules-based global order, we, as Europeans,the EU and its Member States must defend multilateralism, international law, democracy and human rights;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that multilateralism is at the centre of the EU’s and Member States' efforts to prevent and solve conflicts;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the European Union, in full cooperation with Member States, needs to take on a global leadership role and unlock its political potential to think and act like a geopolitical power while defending and promoting its common values and interests in the world; reaffirms the need to secure ‘EU strategic autonomy’; fully supports the Commission President’s decision to transform the EU’s executive branch into a ‘geopolitical commission’;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 121 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the European Union needs to take on a global leadership role and unlock its political potential to think and act like a geopolitical powera more prominent role in international sphere and unlock its political potential to act while defending and promoting its common values and interests in the world; reaffirms the need to secure ‘EU strategic autonomy’; fully supportnotes the Commission President’s decision to transform the EU’s executive branch into a ‘geopolitical commission’, underlining however the leading role of the Council and Member States in defining foreign policy of the EU;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the European Union has to switch from a responsive to an anticipatory approach and team up with like-minded partners, especially NATO, in order to defend the global rule-based order founded on international law; recalls that the EU’s CFSP is based on partnership and multilateralism, which help to unite the relevant regional and global powers; underlines the urgent need to explore new forms of alliances and find innovative mechanisms for cooperation;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 151 #

2019/2136(INI)

8. Promotes an EU foreign policy that will unite the EU institutions and all foreign ministries behind a common and strong EU-level foreign policy that should be based on consensus among the Member States; emphasises the need to build where necessary ad hoc coalitions to strengthen EU cohesion and democratic legitimacy;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses its commitment to enlargement, which remains a key policy of the EU and for the European perspective of the Western Balkans; reiterates that pursuant to Article 49 TEU, any state in Europe may apply to become a member of the European Union provided that it adheres to the Copenhagen criteria and the principles of democracy, respects fundamental freedoms and human and minority rights, and upholds the rule of law;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 175 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the European Union can only deliver its full potential when speaking with one voice and when decision-making is shifted step by step from the national to the supranational level, taking full advantage of the possibilities offered by the EU institutions and their procedures; stresses that the European Union should use all available means to achieve this goal, including those offered by parliamentary diplomacy;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 176 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the European Union can only deliver its full potential when speaking with one voice and when decision-making is shifted step by step from the national to the supranational level, taking full advantage of the possibilities offered by the EU institutions and their procedures, especially the Council; stresses that the European Union should use all available means to achieve this goal, including those offered by parliamentary diplomacy;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 261 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines the unconditional EU support for sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of all Eastern Partnership countries within their internationally recognized borders and strongly underlines the importance of the proactive stance based on international law against protracted conflicts in the Eastern Neighbourhood;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 262 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Reaffirms its strong support for Ukraine's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders and remains fully committed to the policy of non-recognition of the illegal annexation of Crimea;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 263 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Reiterates its support for the Eastern Partnership, which celebrated its 10-year anniversary in 2019; stresses however that in order to be more successful it needs new initiatives and commitments from both sides, the EU and our partners;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 270 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 d (new)
17d. Underlines, that more than a decade after the end of the Russian aggression in Georgia and subsequent ceasefire brokered by the EU, the Russians are still in blatant violation of some of its provisions and the borderisation process is ongoing; in light of recent unlawful detention of monitors of EUMM (European Union Monitoring Mission) by armed South Ossetian de facto security forces, calls for strengthening of EUMM mandate and visibility and urges Russian Federation as the occupying power to honour its international obligations and grant EUMM unhindered access to the occupied regions;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 274 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the strengthening of the EU’s capacity to act autonomously in the area of security and defence; stresses that , however, the leading role of NATO as a guarantor of European security and underlines the need of maintaining closest possible cooperation with the Alliance on all defence-related matters, as well as efficient cooperation with other partner organisations such as the UN or NATO is more vital than ever;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 284 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for the strengthening of the EU’s capacity to act autonomouslyEU and Member States' cooperation in the area of security and defence; stresses that efficient cooperation with partnerpartnerships with organisations such as the UN or NATO is moare vital than ever;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 291 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that qualified majority voting (QMV) could make the EU’s foreign and security policy more effective and would speed up the decision-making process; calls on the Council to make regular use of QMV in the cases envisaged in Article 31(2) of the TEU and calls on the European Council to take up this initiative by making use of the ‘passerelle clause’ contained in Article 31(3) of the TEU; encourages the Council to consider extending QMV to other areas of the CFSP;deleted
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 293 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that qualified majority voting (QMV) could make the EU’s foreign and security policy more effective and would speed up theRejects the proposals to move beyond unanimity in Council decision- making process; calls on the Council to make regular use of QMV in the cases envisaged in Article 31(2) of the TEU and calls on the European Council to take up this initiative by making use of the ‘passerelle clause’ contained in Article 31(3) of the TEU; encourages the Council to consider extending QMV to other areas of the CFSPin foreign affairs and to consider adopting qualified majority voting (QMV); encourages Member States to examine ways in which they can act more effectively;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 306 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its call to explore the establishment of a European Security Council, in full dialogue and cooperation with Member States, that would improve the decision- making process and lead to more effective intergovernmental cooperation in this field;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 313 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. WelcomeRejects the decision of the President of the Commission to build, within five years, a genuine European Defence Union; stresses that NATO remains and should remain the bedrock of European security cooperation;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. WelcomNotes the decision of the President of the Commission to build, within five years, a genuine European Defence Union;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 323 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that Article 20(2) of the TEU, which lays down provisions for enhanced cooperation, provides additional possibilities for Member States to move forward with the CFSP and should therefore be usmay be used if desired;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 343 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Stresses that strengthening substantial relations with East and Southeast Asia is essential to the EU's rules-based, comprehensive and sustainable Connectivity Strategy; takes note of the military build-up in the region and calls for all parties involved to respect the freedom of navigation, to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China Seas and the Taiwan Strait; expresses concern that foreign interferences from autocratic regimes through disinformation and cyber-attacks on the upcoming general elections threaten Asian democracies and regional stability; reiterates its support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organisations, mechanisms and activities;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 355 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the VP/HR, the Commission and the Member States to continue and step up their efforts to increase their ability to confront hybrid threats by strengthening the EU’s cyber defences and resilience against hybrid threats; calls, in this regard, for the development of comprehensive joint capacities and methods to analyse risk and vulnerability;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 365 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Promotes the boosting of the European Union’s strategic communication capabilities; calls, in that connection, for further support for the EEAS Strategic Communications Division by turning it into a fully-fledged unit within the EEAS, responsible for the Eastern and Southern neighbourhoods, with proper staffing and adequate budgetary resources, possibly by means of an additional dedicated budget line;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 366 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. PromoteStresses that foreign interference into European affairs pose a great risk to Europe's security and stability; strongly supports the boosting of the European Union’s strategic communication capabilities; calls, in that connection, for further support for the EEAS Strategic Communications Division as it plays a vital role;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 387 #

2019/2136(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Recognises the important role of the civil and military missions that form part of the CSDP in maintaining peace, avoiding conflicts and strengthening international security; underlines, however, the leading role of NATO as important pillar of European security and welcomes the ongoing process of NATO enlargement which contributes to the stability and well-being of Europe;
2019/11/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to Russia's illegal invasion and annexation of Crimea,
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 b (new)
- having regard to the Intermediate Range Nuclear Force (INF) Treaty, Russia's repeated violations including the development and deployment of 9M729 ground-launched cruise missile systems and the US and Russian withdrawal from the Treaty,
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 c (new)
- having regard to Russia's violation of airspace and maritime borders of member states,
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the lasting deterioration in the Union’s strategic environment in the face of multiple challenges directly or indirectly affecting the security of its Member States and citizens: armed conflicts immediately to the east and south of the European continent, jihadist terrorism, cyber attacks, foreign interference, uncontrolled migration, increasing threats to natural resources, climate change, etc.;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that global actors (the US, China, Russia) and an increasing number of regional actors (Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.) are seeking to assert power through a combination of unilateral diplomatic posturing and increasing military military build-ups;deleted
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 58 #

2019/2135(INI)

4 a. Stresses that strengthening substantial relations with East and Southeast Asia is essential to the EU's rules-based, comprehensive and sustainable Connectivity Strategy; takes note of the military build-up in the region and calls for all parties involved to respect the freedom of navigation, to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China Seas and the Taiwan Strait; expresses concern that foreign interferences from autocratic regimes through disinformation and cyber-attacks on the upcoming general elections threaten Asian democracies and regional stability; reiterates its support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organisations, mechanisms and activities;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 68 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the Union has been slow to react and adapt – politically, diplomatically and militarily – to new crises and to this new international context; considers that, in the specific area of defence, there has been insufficient investment, differences in capabilities and a lack of interoperability, but also, and above all, a political reluctance to implement the robust provisions provided for in the European treaties and the numerous cooperation arrangements between Member States have weakened the Union’s ability to play a decisive role in external crises; recognises, further, that no country is able by itself to address the security challenges on the European continent and in its immediate environment;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes, in this adverse and volatile context, the belated but real recognition of shared security interests and the growing political will on the part of European countries and the European institutions to act collectively for their security by endowing themselves with greater means to act autonomouslydecisively; welcomes also the great increase in US commitment to European security, not least through its enhanced $6 billion European Deterrence Initiative and the increase in its Forward Military Presence in Europe;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Is convinced that the response to the Union’s security challengesdefence and security of the Union lies primarily in strengthening its strategic autonomythe Atlantic Alliance;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 97 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Welcomes and supports Operation Atlantic Resolve and NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence on the European continent and recognises the importance of NATO troops in the effort to deter further Russian aggression and provide crucial support in the event of a conflict;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 99 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Acknowledges that close cooperation should also take place with third countries and through the command and planning structure of NATO; such cooperation will provide vital capabilities, such as strategic lift, essential to operations in the European periphery;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 108 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the principle of European strategic autonomy is based on the ability of the Union to strengmistaken idea that the EU is better able thean its freedomNATO or our nations to assess, take decisions and take action where circumstances so require in order to defend its interests and valuesto defend the interests and values of our citizens while some European countries might well embark on low intensity military operations, it is difficult to imagine circumstances where European countries would engage in major combat operations without the support of NATO Allies and therefore urges renewed commitment to the revitalisation of the Alliance;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 134 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the affirmation of European strategic autonomy depends on the establishment of European defence cooperation in the technological, capability, industrial and operational fields; considers that only practical and flexible cooperation based on pragmatic initiatives will make it possible to gradually overcome the difficulties, forge a genuine common strategic culture and shape common responses tailored to the continent’s main security and defence issues;deleted
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that strategic autonomy can only be genuinely achieved if Member States demonstrate solidarity, which is reflected in particular in the need to prioritise the procurement of European capabilities where equipment is available and competitive with the primary objective being to ensure interoperability with major Allies and avoid duplication among European forces to facilitate rapid deployment in as seamless a manner as possible;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that the principle of European strategic autonomy is a legitimate and necessary ambition and that it must remain a priority objective of European defence policy; stresses that its practical and operational implementation is a common responsibility of European states;deleted
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 162 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Maintains that European strategic autonomy must take practical form in the areas of industry, capability (joint programmes, investment in defence technologies) and operations (financing of operations, capacity building for partners, capacity to plan and conduct missions) and can be based upon the successes of the NATO Industrial Advisory group and be complementary to the existing commitments of Member States who are part of the Transatlantic Defence Technological and Industrial Cooperation (TADIC);
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers that Europe’s defence is based largely on the Union’s capacity to intervAcknowledges that CSDP activities are small-scale operations within the European periphery and have limited manpower and objectives recognizes that the EU cannot replicate or replace the command and defence militarily, in a credible manner, in external theatres of operationsplanning structures of NATO and its role as the cornerstone of European defence;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 225 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Deplores the lengthy decision- making and implementation processes; points out that very few recent military operations have been given an executive mandate because of the different speeds at which commitment decisions are made, and calls, in this connection, for changes to CSDP structures and procedures so that missions can be deployed in a more rapid, flexible and coherent manner; notes the use of a new crisis management tool – the launching of mini-missions under Article 28 TEU – with a view to responding to crises more quickly and flexibly; calls for mission construction to be complementary to NATO's Readiness Action Plan (RAP) and Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VTJF) to avoid duplication and better support joint mission objectives;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses the need to assess missions and operations on a regular basis in order to make them more effective; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to draw up mandates and budgets which are appropriate to the operations concerned and to provide for an exit strategy; calls, in that connection, for more regular consultations with the relevant parliamentary committees, and calls on the latter to focus their missions and delegations on areas where CSDP missions and operations are deployed; calls for the European Court of Auditors to conduct a review of all ongoing CSDP missions to ensure that their budgets and forces are being deployed in the most effective way; further calls for all ongoing CSDP missions to have a formal end date, which is subject to a full and comprehensive review before consideration of any extension is given;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 238 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Recalls the importance of organising joint training and exercises between European and US armed forces, thereby promoting interoperability, with a view to maximising mission preparedness and addressing a broad range of threats, both conventional and non-conventional;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Notes the decision of 26 September 2019 to extend the EU maritime operation in the Mediterranean (EUNAVFORMED Sophia) by six months to 31 March 2020; deeply deplornotes the decision to temporarily to suspend the naval presence; stresses the urgent need to reach agreement among the Member States and calls for the redeployment of naval assets and full implementation of the mandate;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 289 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Expects the Union to make effective use of all existing CSDP policy instruments in the areas of diplomacy, cooperation, development, conflict management and peacekeeping; stresses that CSDP military and civilian instruments cannot, under any circumstances, be the only solution to security issues and that a ‘comprehensive approach’ should always be adopted; considers that only the use of all these instruments on the basis of a ‘comprehensive approach’ will provide the flexibility needed to effectively achieve the most ambitious security objectives;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 310 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Welcomes the significant reversal of the trend of cutting defence budgets as a result of the Defence Investment Pledge made at the NATO Summit in Wales in 2014; is of the opinion that this should be supported and encouraged at Union level;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 335 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. WelcomNotes the Commission’s proposal of June 2017 to create a European Defence Fund (EDF), which would foster cooperation between Member States and support the European defence industry; stresses that the EDF should not in any way undermine the position of NATO as the foundation of European defence; notes that this proposal is the first initiative for which Community funds are to be used in direct support of defence projects; recognises that this is a major step forward for European defence, from both a political and an industrial perspective; notes that the EDF could finance structural projects such as the future European aircraft or tank or a European anti-missile defence capability; notes that the 2019 work programme for the preparatory action will focus on electromagnetic spectrum dominance and future disruptive defence technologies, two key areas for maintaining Europe’s technological independence in the long term; welcomes, also, the adoption by the Commission in March 2019 of the first European Defence Industrial Development Programme (EDIDP) and the publication of nine calls for proposals for 2019, including for the Eurodrone, which is a key capability for Europe’s strategic autonomy; points out that 12 further calls for proposals will follow in 2020, covering priority areas in all domains (air, land, sea, cyber and space); notes the link between the procurement decisions taken today by the Member States and the prospects for industrial and technological cooperation under the EDF;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 344 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Welcomes the effective implementation of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) as an important step towards closer cooperation in security and defence among Member States; stresses that this provision, introduced in the 2009 Lisbon Treaty (Article 46 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), is legally binding and includes a set of ambitious commitments to enable European countries wishing to do so to move ahead faster on common defence projects; recognises the role that PESCO can play in structuring European demand; notes that a significant number of EDIDP- eligible projects are being developed within the PESCO framework and may also benefit from higher rates of subsidy; supports full consistency between PESCO projects and the EDF; calls for the closest possible access to PESCO for third countries, acknowledging that such countries' defence industries have expertise, related instruments and capabilities that EU Member's industries could benefit from;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 345 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Welcomes the effectivNotes the implementation of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) as an important step towards closer cooperation in security and defence among Member States; stresses that thisPESCO should not in any way undermine the position of NATO as the foundation of European defence; stresses that the provision, introduced in the 2009 Lisbon Treaty (Article 46 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), is legally binding and includes a set of ambitious commitments to enable European countries wishing to do so to move ahead faster on common defence projects; recognises the role that PESCO can play in structuring European demand; notes that a significant number of EDIDP- eligible projects are being developed within the PESCO framework and may also benefit from higher rates of subsidy; supports full consistency between PESCO projects and the EDF;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 364 #

2019/2135(INI)

45. Questions the slow start-up of the 34 projects and the delays to the launch of a third wave of 13 projects, given that none are as yet up and running; notes that only four projects will reach their initial operational capacity in 2019; highlights the lack of ambition and scale of some projects, which do not address the most obvious capability gaps, particularly those in the first wave, which are primarily capability projects involving as many Member States as possible; notes that the desired inclusion of participation in PESCO projects should not jeopardise a high level of ambition on the part of the participating Member States; considers that third countries’ involvement should be subject to stringent conditions and based on established and effective reciprocity; calls on the Member States to submit projects with a strategic European dimension, thereby strengthening the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB), which is an essential part of the strategic autonomisation process and relates more to the operational side in order to respond directly to the operational needs of European armed forces while avoiding any duplication of existing capability initiatives;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 368 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Stresses the still virtual nature of the European Defence Fund; points out that that this instrument has not yet been finally approved, with only partial and political agreement having been given in April 2019; stresses the importance of maintaining Parliament’s position concerning the amount of the EDF, the involvement of third countries and the establishment of an appropriate intellectual property policy in relation to security and defence in order to protect research results; draws attention, in that connection, to the highly sensitive and strategic nature of defence research, both for industrial competitiveness and for the strategic autonomy of the Union; calls for the initial lessons learned from the implementation of the EDIDP (in particular concerning the application of derogations for eligible entities), the pilot project and the preparatory action on defence research to be properly taken into account; calls on the Member States to be fully involved in the decision-making process in order to avoid bureaucratic excesses and to ensure that the programmes included address the strategic needs of the CSDP and the Member States; considers that the success of the EDF will depend on its ability to cater for the specific defence needs of the participating states and to guarantee the availability of sufficient budgetary resources, whilst ensuring that industrial know-how is not duplicated, national defence investment is not crowded out and cooperation does not become over-complicated; considers that developing the European defence industry by regulating access for entities controlled by non-EU third parties to projects financed by the Fund is fully consistent with the European ambition of strategic autonomy; , SME engagement is supported by incubation and capital investment and cooperation does not become over-complicated; considers that 22 Member States are committed under their NATO membership to commit 20% of their defence expenditure on investment in new capabilities and therefore should isolate part of this budget specifically towards research and development to guarantee a minimum expenditure in R+D; EDF should collaborate actively with NATO in order to facilitate transatlantic technological and industrial development in a manner that removes barriers and protectionism and ensures export licensing processes/technological transfer policies are harmonized among Member States; special consideration should be given to the development of a task force between EDA and NSPA/NCIA for developing a roadmap on identifying ideal equipment for procurement and to generate the best value on defence expenditure;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 378 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Hopes that decisions on the participation of third parties in PESCO projects will under no circumstances undermine the conditions agreed in the negotiations on the EDF and the EDIDP, given the purely European and that cooperation with a post-Brexit UK and our transatlantic partners is encouraged regardless of the nature of the financing of these programmes;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 393 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
49. Is convinced that the Union has a vital interest in creating a safe and open maritime environment which makes for the free passage of goods and people; stresses that the freedom of navigation is tantamount and may not be undermined; notes that most of the strategic assets, critical infrastructure and capabilities are under the control of Member States and that their willingness to enhance cooperation is paramount for European security; reaffirms the Union’s role as a global maritime security provider, and stresses the importance of developing relevant military and civilian capabilities; welcomes in that connection the adoption of the revised EU Maritime Security Strategy Action Plan in June 2018;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 398 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
50. Believes that the Union and its Member States face an unprecedented threat in the form of cyber attacks as well as cyber crime and terrorism; believes that the nature of cyber attacks makes them a threat that requires a Union-level response; supports NATO's decision to include cyber attacks under Art. 5; encourages the Member States to mimic this by provideing mutual assistance in the event of a cyber attack against any one of them as 22 Member States are likewise committed for their fellow NATO Allies;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 403 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
50. Believes that the Union and its Member States face an unprecedented threat in the form of cyber attacks as well as cyber crime and terrorism by both state and non-state actors; believes that the nature of cyber attacks makes them a threat that requires a Union-level response; encourages the Member States to provide mutual assistance in the event of a cyber attack against any one of them;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 410 #

2019/2135(INI)

51a. Recognizes the growing importance of cyber and automated intelligence capabilities, stresses that these provide threats to all the Member States and EU institutions, urges all EU institutions and Member States to continue to improve upon their cyber and automated technologies, further encourages cooperation on these technological advances;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 413 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
52. Recognises the increasingly prominent role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in European defence; notes, in particular, the many military applications stemming from AI for managing and simulating operational environments, assisting the decision- making process, detecting threats and processing intelligence; stresses that the development of reliable AI in the field of defence is essential for ensuring European strategic autonomy in capability and operational areasoperational objectives are accomplished; calls on the Union to keep up its investment in this area and in particular in disruptive technologies through existing instruments (European Defence Fund, European Innovation Council, future Horizon Europe, Digital Europe programme); encourages transatlantic cooperation in this space to ensure partnering on development and application are used to maximize added value to joint operations and commitments;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 421 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52 a (new)
52a. Underlines the importance of achieving quantum computing capabilities and stresses the need to enhance EU-US cooperation in this area to ensure that quantum computing is first realized among partners sharing warm relations and supporting objectives;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 425 #

2019/2135(INI)

54. Stresses that the ambition of European strategic autonomy is based on the ability of Europeans to take action to defend their interests, either independently or within an institutional cooperation framework (NATO, UN)recognising that this must ensure complementarity to NATO and UN missions and operations;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 436 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
55. Considers that European strategic autonomyactions must be based on sustainable cooperation and strategic partnerships with countries and organisations sharing the Union’s values; welcomes, further, the contributions made by CSDP partners to Union missions and operations;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 438 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55 a (new)
55a. Acknowledges and welcomes the continued US military presence in Europe and welcomes the $1.75 billion increase in the budget for the European Deterrence Initiative, rising to $6.531 billion for 2019;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 440 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
56. Considers it essential to maintain strong, close and special defence and security cooperation between the Union and the United Kingdom after Brexit; stresses that working in cooperation with the United Kingdom will enable the Union to maximise its capabilities and operational capacitiesthe UK is Europe's most capable and committed military power; considers that defence cooperation which systematically excludes the United Kingdom should be ruled out; proposes the conclusion of a defence and security treatyarrangement with the United Kingdom which enables that country to participate, as far as possible, in Union instrument in Union missions on a case-by-case basis, guaranteeing command of its own forces in any CSDP operation and ensuring an ambitious relationship with the EDA beyond that of other third countries;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 462 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
60. Supports, in parallel with institutional cooperation and partnerships, the combining of different forms of flexible, multifaceted, open and, at the same time, operational, ambitious and demanding cooperation, both within and outside EU, NATO and UN structures, which could facilitate joint commitments in operations, thereby strengthening the Union’s operational strategic autonomyobjectives; stresses, in this connection, that examples of cooperation such as the European Intervention Initiative, the Nordic Defence Cooperation (NORDEFCO), Visegrad 4 Group and the increasing integration of the German and Dutch armed forces refelect this drive for closer military cooperation between Member States;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 467 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 b (new)
60b. Recognizes and supports the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) to Libya, that has been assisting with the transition to democracy and works to train, advise, and develop Libyan border security in land, air and sea;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 468 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 c (new)
60c. Further calls upon the EU to keep its commitments in the Fourth EU- African Summit to support economic and political stability and to further support the capabilities of the African Standby Force;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 469 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 d (new)
60d. Recommends that Member States adopt weapon systems and munitions in accordance with NATO standards in order to maintain interoperability among allies;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 470 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 e (new)
60e. Encourages the Member States to continue cooperation with the AU and continue to fulfil commitments already made;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 472 #

2019/2135(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60 g (new)
60g. Recognizes the growing political, economic, environmental, security and strategic value of the Arctic Circle, urges the Member States to continue cooperation with the Arctic Council on all issues of EU interest and to form a comprehensive strategy for the region;
2019/11/12
Committee: AFET