15 Amendments of Karen MELCHIOR related to 2021/2046(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a Calls on the Commission to further support the development of trustworthy AI systems in order to render transport safer, more efficient, accessible, affordable and inclusive;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 b (new)
Paragraph -1 b (new)
-1b Calls on the Commission to work closely with Member States on the design, implementation and enforcement of trustworthy AI standards in the Union; notes that the Union has the potential to become a global leader in promoting a socially responsible and sustainable approach to AI technology and its use;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 c (new)
Paragraph -1 c (new)
-1c Highlights that the European approach to AI technology should secure people’s trust, serve the public interest, and strengthen shared social responsibility; considers the development of trustworthy, ethically responsible and technically robust AI to be an important enabler for sustainable and smart mobility that is safe and accessible; in this regard, calls on the Commission to continue to promote the uptake of AI in the transport sector and to ensure that Union fundamental rights are respected, notably taking into account a human-centred approach to AI technologies;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 d (new)
Paragraph -1 d (new)
-1d Recommends the development of Union-wide trustworthy AI standards for all modes of transport, notably with regard to interoperability and sharing of data acquired through smart applications, while respecting data protection rules
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 e (new)
Paragraph -1 e (new)
-1e Calls on the Commission to develop civil liability rules for the use of AI technologies, which would create trust in the use of AI systems, also in the mobility sector, whereby the establishment of guidelines for a harmonised risk classification scheme of AI-enabled technologies in all modes of transport, notably intelligent transport systems, should be a key priority;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the role and incentive potential of intellectual property rights for smart mobility, which is a fast-growing and innovative sector with – among others – a major social impact;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that in a sector, such as the mobility sector, exclusivity over data rights can produce a barrier to market entry, increased transaction costs, and a barrier to innovation that is harmful to operators, SMEs, and the publice rights on data, can hamper new market entries, and become a barrier to innovation, notably harmful for SMEs and start-ups; calls in this respect on the Commission to establish rules on the interoperability and portability of data for operators and users and to address the risk of monopolies in this sector;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Supports the use of artificial intelligence for the transport of the future, with features such as predictive maintenance, while continuing to pay attention to the centrality of the human factortresses that the EU sustainable and smart mobility would benefit from a new regulatory framework, which addresses emerging technologies and their use in the transport sector, such as AI technologies; recalls in this regard the need for a clear ethical framework for achieving trustworthy AI, including safety, security, the respect of human autonomy, oversight and liability aspects, which will increase benefits that are shared by all and will be key to boosting investment in research and innovation, development of skills and the uptake of AI by public services;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Supports the use of artificial intelligence for the transport of the future, with features such as predictive maintenance, while continuing to pay attention to the centrality of the human factor; Vehicles that have high levels of advanced driving systems should continue to put the driver at the centre of the driving task and fully autonomous vehicles should have their bahaviour regulated to negate any aggressive manoeuvres towards other road users;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b Reiterates the need for a balance between, on the one hand, the green mobility and, on the other hand, the goal of leaving no one behind; in this regard, emphasizes the need for mobility to be available at affordable prices for all, to be better connected for rural and remote areas and to offer proper social conditions according to The European Pillar of Social Rights;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3c (new)
Paragraph 3c (new)
3c Recalls the potential of blockchain technology in the transport sector in order to trace corporate environmental and social sustainability commitments, including for the import of raw and processed materials; calls on the Commission to make full use of blockchain technologies to monitor value chains, while equally monitoring and avoiding indirect adverse effects, such as exponential growth of energy consumption;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. The strategy recognises that to achieve systemic change, sustinable alternatives must be widely available (10 (2)). This can be condidered as “right to active mobility” and that every EU citizen who wishes to travel to work or school by walking or cycling should be able to do so and not be prevented by barriers such as unsafe road nerworks;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Stresses that cycling and bike- sharing is an intergral part of the European multi-modal transport system, inclusding in MaaS and MMTIS service schemes into all relevant policies, schemes, project funding and research projects; Indeed active mobility should be prioritised over individual motorised transport through these measures. As part of this integration, cycling and Public Bike Sharing data and services must be interoperable and easily available for public authorities; Hence to include cycling data and system processes in any work on EU wide ticketing standardisation;