Activities of Klára DOBREV related to 2020/2013(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice
Amendments (8)
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 1
paragraph 1
1. Sees the great potential offered by the use and development of artificial intelligence as an opportunity for more rapid economic development in the EU; stresses however that in order to harness these opportunities the EU should adopt an appropriate legal framework to mitigate the risks, ensure its ethical use, and prevent its use for malicious purposes; such a framework should clearly determine appropriate liability, accountability, security and traceability regimes;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 2
paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the use, creation and management of artificial intelligence must respect the fundamental rights, values and freedoms expressed in the EU Treaties, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and in the ideaprinciples underpinning the creation of the European Union; welcomestakes note of the publication of the Commission's White Paper on Artificial Intelligence and encourages deeper research into the use of Artificial Intelligence by state authorities; stresses that the European Union must contribute tobe in the forefront of the creation of an international legal and ethical framework for the use of AI, especially in the context of building the strategic advantage that AI can offer rooted in the principles of human rights, especially in the context of military use; calls for confidence-building and risk- reduction measures with global actors regarding the development and use of military AI;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 2 a (new)
paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses that a comprehensive AI regulatory and strategic framework is needed at EU level in the field of security and defence, that is based on responsibility, protecting our citizens, preserving peace, preventing conflicts and strengthening international security which could be a basis for international norms and standards;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 3
paragraph 3
3. NotStresses that artificial intelligence has great potential in the fight against crime, online terrorist content and cybercrime; considers that, in each of these cathe design and operation of artificial intelligence should respect human dignity, rights, freedoms and cultural diversity, stresses, there must be certainty that its usat AI systems should be does not lead to the unjustified deletion or blocking of content and thus to the censorship of or discrimination against views expressed onliigned and operated in a non-biased and non-discriminatory manner;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 3 b (new)
paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Stresses that persons should have the right to access, manage and control their data in AI-enabled systems and information should be available to them on what type of information the system is allowed to record. for how long the data is stored and who can have access to that information;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 4
paragraph 4
4. Stresses that all operations undertaken by artificial intelligence must always remain under human supervision; stresses that artificial intelligence in the justice system sh throughout their entire life-cycle, and legal responsibility for any decision must be born by easily identifiable humans, in particular with regards to lethal automatic weapons; recalls in this respect its position on a ban on the development, production and use of fully autonomous weapons systems to avoid any destabilising AI arms race; regrets that no explicit conventions exist on a global scale on the use of such weapons; stresses that artificial intelligence in civil justice could be used to improve the analysis and collection of data and the protection of victims, but that it is no substitute for human beings in terms of sentencing or decision-making;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 4 b (new)
paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Is deeply concerned about the deep fake technologies that allow increasingly realistic photo, audio and video forgeries that could be used for blackmailing, to generate false news reports, erode public trust and influence public discourse; underlines that AI also enables comprehensive behavioral profiling using digital footprint of a person which can also be used for targeted influence operations or blackmailing; both practices have the potential of destabilizing countries, spreading disinformation and influence elections; calls for adequate research in this regard to ensure that countering technologies keep pace with the malicious use of AI;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion
paragraph 5
paragraph 5
5. Notes that the situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic means that governments are facing considerable pressure from their citizens to protect their health effectively; considers however that the use of artificial intelligence can greatly help in the fight against the global pandemic.ny tracing applications should remain voluntary and the data collected should be anonymous;