BETA

Activities of Marco DREOSTO related to 2020/0097(COD)

Plenary speeches (2)

Amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (debate)
2020/09/14
Dossiers: 2020/0097(COD)
Union Civil Protection Mechanism (debate)
2021/04/26
Dossiers: 2020/0097(COD)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism
2020/09/07
Committee: ENVI
Dossiers: 2020/0097(COD)
Documents: PDF(373 KB) DOC(169 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Nikos ANDROULAKIS', 'mepid': 125110}]

Amendments (6)

Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
(8) As a 24/7 operational centre at Union level with capacity to follow and support operations in various types of emergencies, within and outside the Union, in real-time, the Emergency Response Coordination Centre (‘ERCC’) should be further strengthened. This should include enhanced coordination of the ERCC with Member States’ national crisis systems and civil protection authorities, as well as with other relevant Union bodies. The work of the ERCC is supported by scientific expertise, including that provided by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.
2020/07/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The ERCC should always act in coordination with national civil protection departments, the strategic importance of which has already been widely recognised. Indeed, national civil protection departments are an asset to be exploited, given that they are organised in a functional and efficient way, as already demonstrated during the COVID-19 emergency, and should be key partners in order to avoid wasting information and resources.
2020/07/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 17
(17) In order to increase flexibility as well as achieve optimal budget execution, indirect management should be included as a method of budget implementation only where justified by the nature and content of the action in question. In all other cases, direct management should always be the preferred option.
2020/07/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 25
(25) Annex I to Decision No 1313/2013/EU is not flexible enough to allow the Union to properly adjust investments in prevention, preparedness and response and thus it is deleted. Investment levels to be allocated to the different phases of the disaster risk management cycle need to be determined in advance. This absence of flexibility prevents the Union from being able to react to the unpredictable nature of disasters.deleted
2020/07/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
rescEU capacities shall be hosted by the Member States that acquire, rent, lease or otherwise contract those capacities. As a way to enhance Union resilience, rescEU capacities acquired, rented, leased or otherwise contracted by the Commission are to be strategically pre-positioned inside the Union. In consultation with Member States, rescEU capacities acquired, rented, leased or otherwise contracted by the Commission could also be located in third countries via trusted networks managed by relevant international organisations.;
2020/07/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Decision No 1313/2013/EU
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall implement the Union's financial support in accordance with the Financial Regulation in direct management or, in exceptional cases, in indirect management with bodies referred to in Article 62(1)(c) of the Financial Regulation. When choosing the implementation method for financial support, priority shall be given to direct management. Only where justified by the nature and content of the action concerned may the Commission use indirect management.
2020/07/08
Committee: ENVI