4 Amendments of Sabrina PIGNEDOLI related to 2021/2111(DEC)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Understands the impact that the pandemic had on the activity of the Union institutions, including the tight deadlines for adopting new legislation and thus, for the consultative committees to deliver their opinions; recalls that the Committee adopted, prior to the approval of its amended procedure, 13 position papers in response to referrals to ensure an effective and timely contribution to the Union response; is aware that the Committee monitors its compliance with the institutional deadlines set for its opinions and that ad hoc measures have been adopted following an internal audit report from 2019; askurges the Committee to report on these measures and other possible actions in this regard; recalls its recommendations made in previous discharge resolutions to enhance the interinstitutional cooperation and consequently the impact of the Committee’s work;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes the conclusion of the settlement agreements with the two victims of moral harassment in December 2020 and March 2021 respectively; takes note that the last pending point for the full implementation of both settlement agreements depends on an upcoming change to the organisation chart in agreement with the Committee of the Regions and planned for implementation on 1 October 2022; calls onurges the Committee to promptly report to the budgetary authority on the eventual effective enforcement of this point;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Notes the Committee’s monthly updates and the follow-up to Parliament’s observations in the 2020 discharge resolution; recalls that the OLAF report on case OC/2018/0666/A.1 only concerns the behaviour of the perpetrator towards the victims and that the judgement delivered by the Court of Justice in case T-377/20 simply examines the validity of the Bureau decision of 9 June 2020; points out that the long handling of the case by the Committee’s administration and particularly the shortcomings in the implementation of internal procedures have therefore in no way been examined or validated; believes that the cases occurred require a more in-depth analysis and strongly reiterates, therefore, its call for an external investigation specifically on the action, or lack thereof, of the administrative hierarchy of the Committee over the extent of the case which led to the flagrant breach of its duty of care towards the staff; urges, further, the Committee to resolve to apply uniform procedures for dealing with cases of harassment so that there are no differences between victims, and with a view to ensuring equal treatment of the accused, independently of factors unrelated to the case;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Objects to the rejection by the Committee of the use of the Transparency Register on the grounds that the Committee is a consultative body; urges the Committee to join the transparency register with a view to improving the transparency of its interactions with external interest representatives;