30 Amendments of Sara CERDAS related to 2023/0271(COD)
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Urban and regional train passenger services use the European railway network in a mixed mode with other transports as rail freight and international passenger transport services. Regional and urban railway services are crucial for the European network and for achieving the goals of the Green Deal too. The overwhelming majority of train passengers are travelling on these services.
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Urban and regional train passenger services use the European railway network in a mixed mode with other transports as rail freight and international passenger transport services. Regional and urban railway services are crucial for the European network and for achieving the goals of the Green Deal too. The overwhelming majority of train passengers are travelling on these services.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) enable the linking of international transport services with urban and regional transport services;
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) enable the linking of international transport services with urban and regional transport services;
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 a (new)
(17a) Systematic capacity bandwidths and systematic train paths are based on Article 11 and Article 20 of this Regulation. Embedded in the strategic capacity planning process as defined by Article 11, they take the form of capacity bandwidths which are to be concretized along the different stages of the strategic capacity planning while reaching the form of systematic train paths at the stage of the capacity supply. They are pre- constructed for freight and/or passenger traffic and offered by the infrastructure manager based on different sources such as past timetables, needs submitted by customers, market forecasts and politically driven capacity concepts. They are allocated to market segments and occur in a patterned manner, in a regular schedule.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point 17 a (new)
(17a) Systematic capacity bandwidths and systematic train paths are based on Article 11 and Article 20 of this Regulation. Embedded in the strategic capacity planning process as defined by Article 11, they take the form of capacity bandwidths which are to be concretized along the different stages of the strategic capacity planning while reaching the form of systematic train paths at the stage of the capacity supply. They are pre- constructed for freight and/or passenger traffic and offered by the infrastructure manager based on different sources such as past timetables, needs submitted by customers, market forecasts and politically driven capacity concepts. They are allocated to market segments and occur in a patterned manner, in a regular schedule.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Those procedures shall assess alternative options for the use of infrastructure capacity, based on the following socioeconomic and environmental criteria, subject to the availability of data to be provided by different sources to the infrastructure manager:
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Those procedures shall assess alternative options for the use of infrastructure capacity, based on the following socioeconomic and environmental criteria, subject to the availability of data to be provided by different sources to the infrastructure manager:
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) appropriate consideration of the capacity needs for multi-network rail services while also taking into account the capacity needs for urban and regional rail services in the capacity strategy, capacity model and capacity supply plan;
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) appropriate consideration of the capacity needs for multi-network rail services while also taking into account the capacity needs for urban and regional rail services in the capacity strategy, capacity model and capacity supply plan;
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) Infrastructure managers may declare without delay an element of infrastructure either to be highly utilised or to be congested if the following condition is met: infrastructure works resulting in capacity restrictions scheduled in accordance with Article 10 result in capacity becoming scarce.
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) Infrastructure managers may declare without delay an element of infrastructure either to be highly utilised or to be congested if the following condition is met: infrastructure works resulting in capacity restrictions scheduled in accordance with Article 10 result in capacity becoming scarce.
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Infrastructure managers shall take into account the results of any capacity analysis carried out in neighbouring and potentially affected countries pursuant to this Article in strategic capacity planning, in particular in the capacity strategy, in the capacity model and in the capacity supply plan.
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Infrastructure managers shall take into account the results of any capacity analysis carried out in neighbouring and potentially affected countries pursuant to this Article in strategic capacity planning, in particular in the capacity strategy, in the capacity model and in the capacity supply plan.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Within six months of the completion of a capacity analysis in accordance with Article 22, the infrastructure manager shall establish a capacity-enhancement plan for parts of the infrastructure which have been declared congested.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Within six months of the completion of a capacity analysis in accordance with Article 22, the infrastructure manager shall establish a capacity-enhancement plan for parts of the infrastructure which have been declared congested.
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. The Infrastructure Manager shall be allowed to use, where relevant, specific timetabling approaches including systematic capacity bandwidths and systematic train paths. However, if this approach is used in a Member State, systematic capacity bandwidths and systematic train paths with cross-border relevance shall be aligned with neighbouring Infrastructure Managers across borders.
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. The Infrastructure Manager shall be allowed to use, where relevant, specific timetabling approaches including systematic capacity bandwidths and systematic train paths. However, if this approach is used in a Member State, systematic capacity bandwidths and systematic train paths with cross-border relevance shall be aligned with neighbouring Infrastructure Managers across borders.
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 29 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Infrastructure managers shall inform the regulatory body of all capacity requests received that did not fit the parameters of the available capacity as defined in the capacity supply plan, regardless of whether they were accepted or refused. On the basis of this information the regulatory body shall issue an opinion at least every two years, which may recommend to the infrastructure manager to amend the capacity model.
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 29 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Infrastructure managers shall inform the regulatory body of all capacity requests received that did not fit the parameters of the available capacity as defined in the capacity supply plan, regardless of whether they were accepted or refused. On the basis of this information the regulatory body shall issue an opinion at least every two years, which may recommend to the infrastructure manager to amend the capacity model.
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. In accordance with the rules and procedures set out in Article 20, infrastructure managers may refuse to allocate capacity for rolling planning requests if requests are inconsistent with the capacity supply plan adopted in accordance with Article 18. A refusal shall be communicated to the applicant without delay and the Infrastructure Manager shall if capacity is available provide an alternative solution which complies as much as possible with the applicants’ requirements. The applicant shall have the right to lodge a complaint with the regulatory body.
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. In accordance with the rules and procedures set out in Article 20, infrastructure managers may refuse to allocate capacity for rolling planning requests if requests are inconsistent with the capacity supply plan adopted in accordance with Article 18. A refusal shall be communicated to the applicant without delay and the Infrastructure Manager shall if capacity is available provide an alternative solution which complies as much as possible with the applicants’ requirements. The applicant shall have the right to lodge a complaint with the regulatory body.
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 5
Article 33 – paragraph 5
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 5
Article 33 – paragraph 5
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) provide existing and new shared B2B-services to Infrastructure Mangers and Railway Undertakings to improve rail services and boost trans-European rail traffic.
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 59 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) provide existing and new shared B2B-services to Infrastructure Mangers and Railway Undertakings to improve rail services and boost trans-European rail traffic.
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point 1
Annex I – point 3 – point 1
1. As regards temporary restrictions of the capacity of railway lines, for reasons such as infrastructure works, including associated speed restrictions, axle load, train length, traction, or structure gauge (‘capacity restrictions’), of a duration of more than 7 consecutive days and for which more than 30 % of the estimated traffic volume on a railway line per day is cancelled, re-routed or replaced by other modes of transport, the infrastructure managers concerned shall publish all capacity restrictions, as far as they are known, and the preliminary results of a consultation with the applicants for a first time at least 24 months and, in an updated form, for a second time at least 12 months before the change of the working timetable concerned. These infrastructure restrictions shall be included in the capacity supply plan referred to in Article 18.
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point 1
Annex I – point 3 – point 1
1. As regards temporary restrictions of the capacity of railway lines, for reasons such as infrastructure works, including associated speed restrictions, axle load, train length, traction, or structure gauge (‘capacity restrictions’), of a duration of more than 7 consecutive days and for which more than 30 % of the estimated traffic volume on a railway line per day is cancelled, re-routed or replaced by other modes of transport, the infrastructure managers concerned shall publish all capacity restrictions, as far as they are known, and the preliminary results of a consultation with the applicants for a first time at least 24 months and, in an updated form, for a second time at least 12 months before the change of the working timetable concerned. These infrastructure restrictions shall be included in the capacity supply plan referred to in Article 18.
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point 7
Annex I – point 3 – point 7
7. Without prejudice to Article 40, the infrastructure manager may decide not to apply the periods laid down in points (1) to (5), if the capacity restriction is necessary to re-establish safe train operations, the timing of the restrictions is beyond the control of the infrastructure manager, the application of those periods would be cost ineffective or unnecessarily damaging in respect of asset life or condition, or if all concerned applicants agree. In those cases and in case of any other capacity restrictions that are not subject to consultation in accordance with other provisions of this Annex, the infrastructure manager shall consult the applicants and the main operators of service facilities concerned forthwith.
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – point 3 – point 7
Annex I – point 3 – point 7
7. Without prejudice to Article 40, the infrastructure manager may decide not to apply the periods laid down in points (1) to (5), if the capacity restriction is necessary to re-establish safe train operations, the timing of the restrictions is beyond the control of the infrastructure manager, the application of those periods would be cost ineffective or unnecessarily damaging in respect of asset life or condition, or if all concerned applicants agree. In those cases and in case of any other capacity restrictions that are not subject to consultation in accordance with other provisions of this Annex, the infrastructure manager shall consult the applicants and the main operators of service facilities concerned forthwith.