BETA

Activities of Angelika WINZIG related to 2023/2173(DEC)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2022
2024/03/12
Committee: CONT
Dossiers: 2023/2173(DEC)
Documents: PDF(198 KB) DOC(64 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Michal WIEZIK', 'mepid': 197769}]

Amendments (3)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Commends the launch of the Clean Aviation (‘CA’) program in 2022 and the role of the JU in developing innovative technologies to reduce aircraft emissions and noise;
2024/01/31
Committee: CONT
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that in its 2022 annual accounts, the amounts of contributions recognised per member category (EU and private members) differ significantly from each other; notes that this is because EU cash contributions are validated and recognised when paid to the JU at the beginning of the project implementation, but members’ in-kind contributions are only recognised after validation of the costs incurred and declared for project implementation; notes that the Court considers thatcalls on the JU to address the gap between the recognised amount of cash contributions on the one hand and in- kind contributions on the other hand, was addressed in a suboptimal way in the JU’s 2022 annual accounts by not providing information on the JU members’ legal commitments at year end by providing information on the JU members’ legal commitments at year end; welcomes the commitment of the JU to address the issue fully in the next year's annual accounts;
2024/01/31
Committee: CONT
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. NotWelcomes that, at the end of 2022, the Joint Undertaking had developed and implemented a complete risk-based approach to ex-ante controls in line with the CIC7 guidance, considering the JU- specific risk circumstances; notes, to this end, that the JU identified the most relevant risk criteria and designed, based on them, a risk-based monitoring approach; notes that such an approach allowed the JU to assess the risk level of each project and beneficiary during the main phases of project implementation, such as grant agreement preparation, grant agreement amendment, reporting, and payment; notes, in this regard, that the JU also drew up internal guidelines on their risk-based approach and trained and guided its staff on applying it properly and consistently; _________________ 7 Common Implementation Centre of the Commission’s DG RTD.
2024/01/31
Committee: CONT