Activities of Angelika WINZIG related to 2023/2180(DEC)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking (now the Chips Joint Undertaking) for the financial year 2022
Amendments (4)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Welcomes the JU's contribution to reinforcing EU's strategic autonomy in the electronic components and systems sector;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes with concern that, in its 2022 annual accounts, the JU did not disclose important information regarding members’ contributions at programme level, relevant for the complete communication of the JU’s achievements at the year-end; notes, in particular, that the JU did not compare the contributions received from each member category up to the year-end under each programme with the legal contribution targets set for the respective programme; notes, moreover, that in these accounts, the JU did not disclose the Participating States’ contributions to the JU5 ; calls on the JU to address these issues and welcomes its commitment to provide information, in particular regarding the comparison of the legal targets of the respective programmes; _________________ 5 European Court of Auditors Annual report on EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2022.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. NotWelcomes that, while KDT implemented a risk-based monitoring of projects in line with the Commission’s baseline, as well as a risk assessment of SMEs and newcomers, it; notes, however, that the JU has not yet developed internal guidelines to consolidate the processes; notes that for KDT, the risk of errors in grant payments was mitigated by the fact that the Participating States performed detailed ex- ante controls on the eligibility of project costs reported for national co-financing, for the beneficiaries operating in their national territory;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Notes that the Court considered that the JU showedCalls on the JU to address weaknesses in the use of the reinforced monitoring tool;