BETA

31 Amendments of Tudor CIUHODARU related to 2022/0047(COD)

Amendment 108 #
(5) This Regulation ensures that users of a product or related service in the Union can access, in a timely manner, the data generated by the use of that product or related service and that those users can use the data, including by sharing them with third parties of their choice. It imposes the obligation on the data holder to make data available to users and third parties nominated by the users in certain circumstances and ensure the protection of that data. It also ensures that data holders make data available to data recipients in the Union under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and in a transparent manner. Private law rules are key in the overall framework of data sharing. Therefore, this Regulation adapts rules of contract law and prevents the exploitation of contractual imbalances that hinder fair data access and use for micro, small or medium-sized enterprises within the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC. This Regulation also ensures that data holders make available to public sector bodies of the Member States and to Union institutions, agencies or bodies, where there is an exceptional need, the data that are necessary for the performance of tasks carried out in the public interest. In addition, this Regulation seeks to facilitate switching between data processing services and to enhance the interoperability of data and data sharing mechanisms and services in the Union. This Regulation should not be interpreted as recognising or creating any legal basis for the data holder to hold, have access to or process data, or as conferring any new right on the data holder to use data generated by the use of a product or related service. Instead, it takes as its starting point the control that the data holder effectively enjoys, de facto or de jure, over data generated by products or related services.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) Physical products that obtain, generate or collect, by means of their components, data concerning their performance, use or environment and that are able to communicate that data via a publicly available electronic communications service (often referred to as the Internet of Things) should be covered by this Regulation. Electronic communications services include land- based telephone networks, television cable networks, satellite-based networks and near-field communication networks. Such products may include vehicles, home equipment and consumer goods, medical and health devices or agricultural and industrial machinery. The data represent the digitalisation of user actions and events and should accordingly be accessible to the user, while information derived or inferred from this data, where lawfully held, should not be considered within scope of this Regulation. Such data are potentially valuable to the user and support innovation and the development of digital and other services protecting the environment, health and the circular economy, in particular though facilitating the maintenance and repair of the products in question, in order to prolong their life and avoid the need to use raw materials for the manufacture of new products.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The user of a product should be understood as the legal or natural person, such as a business or consumer, which has purchased, rented or leased the product. Depending on the legal title under which he uses it, such a user bears the risks and enjoys the benefits of using the connected product and should enjoy also the access to the data it generates. The user should therefore be entitled to derive benefit from data generated by that product and any related service, subject to protection of that data.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In case several persons or entities own a product or are party to a lease or rent agreement and benefit from access to a related service, reasonable efforts should be made in the design of the product or related service or the relevant interface so that all persons can have access to data they generate. Users of products that generate data typically require a user account to be set up. This allows for identification of the user by the manufacturer as well as a means to communicate to exercise and process data access requests. Manufacturers or designers of a product that is typically used by several persons should put in place the necessary mechanism that allow separate user accounts for individual persons, where relevant, or the possibility for several persons to use the same user account and ensure appropriate safeguards when accessing that account during its existence. Access should be granted to the user upon simple request mechanisms granting automatic execution, not requiring examination or clearance by the manufacturer or data holder. This means that data should only be made available when the user actually wants this. Where automated execution of the data access request is not possible, for instance, via a user account or accompanying mobile application provided with the product or service, the manufacturer should inform the user how the data may be accessed.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) In sectors characterised by the concentration of a small number of manufacturers supplying end users, there are only limited options available to users with regard to sharing data with those manufacturers. In such circumstances, contractual agreements may be insufficient to achieve the objective of user empowerment. The data tends to remain under the control of the manufacturers, making it difficult for users to obtain value from the data generated by the equipment they purchase or lease. Consequently, there is limited potential for innovative smaller businesses to offer data-based solutions in a competitive manner and for a diverse data economy in Europe. This Regulation should therefore build on recent developments in specific sectors, such as the Code of Conduct on agricultural data sharing by contractual agreement. Sectoral legislation may be brought forward to address sector-specific needs and objectives and develop new applications and services. Furthermore, the data holder should not use any data generated by the use of the product or related service in order to derive insights about the economic situation of the user or its assets or production methods or the use in any other way that could undermine the commercial position of the user on the markets it is active on. This would, for instance, involve using knowledge about the overall performance of a business or a farm in contractual negotiations with the user on potential acquisition of the user’s products or agricultural produce to the user’s detriment, or for instance, using such information to feed in larger databases on certain markets in the aggregate (,e.g. databases on crop yields for the upcoming harvesting season) as such use could affect the user negatively in an indirect manner. The user should be given the necessary technical interface to manage permissions, preferably with granular permission options (such as “allow once” or “allow while using this app or service”), including the option to withdraw permission.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) The user should be free to use the data for any lawful purpose. This includes providing the data the user has received exercising the right under this Regulation to a third party offering an aftermarket service that may be in competition with a service provided by the data holder, or to instruct the data holder to do so. The data holder should ensure that the data made available to the third party is as accurate, complete, reliable, relevant and up-to-date as the data the data holder itself may be able or entitled to access from the use of the product or related service. Any trade secrets or intellectual property rights should be respected in handling the data. It is important to preserve incentives to invest in products with functionalities based on the use of data from sensors built into that product. The aim of this Regulation should accordingly be understood as to foster the development of new, innovative products or related services tailored to the development of society and user needs, stimulate innovation on aftermarkets, but also stimulate the development of entirely novel services making use of the data, including based on data from a variety of products or related services. At the same time, it aims to avoid undermining the investment incentives for the type of product from which the data are obtained, for instance, by the use of data to develop a competing product.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) In order to prevent the exploitation of users, third parties to whom data has been made available upon request of the user should only process the data for the purposes agreed with the user and share it with another third party only if this is necessary to provide the service requested by the user, subject to the protection of that data .
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) In order to ensure that the conditions for mandatory data access are fair for both parties, the general rules on data access rights should refer to the rule on avoiding unfair contract terms, so as to avoid possible prejudice to one party in favour of the other.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
(44) To protect micro, small or medium- sized enterprises from excessive economic burdens which would make it commercially too difficult for them to develop and run innovative business models, the compensation for making data available to be paid by them should not exceed the direct cost of making the data available and be non-discriminatory. A possible means of supporting these businesses in such situations would be to offer affordable subscriptions.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
(48) Ensuring access to alternative ways of resolving domestic and cross-border disputes that arise in connection with making data available should benefit data holders and data recipients and therefore strengthen trust in data sharing. In cases where parties cannot agree on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms of making data available, dispute settlement bodies should offer a simple, fast and low- cost solution to the parties within a reasonable period.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) To avoid that two or more dispute settlement bodies are seized for the same dispute, particularly in a cross-border setting, and prevent excessively lengthy proceedings, a dispute settlement body should be able to reject a request to resolve a dispute that has already been brought before another dispute settlement body or before a court or a tribunal of a Member State.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 57
(57) In case of public emergencies, such as public health emergencies, emergencies resulting from environmental degradation and major natural disasters including those aggravated by climate change, as well as human-induced major disasters, such as major cybersecurity incidents, the public interest resulting from the use of the data will outweigh the interests of the data holders to dispose freely of the data they hold, especially if such an emergency also has cross-border implications. In such a case, data holders should be placed under an obligation to make the data available to public sector bodies or to Union institutions, agencies or bodies upon their request and for a fixed period, so as to identify the best solutions to resolve the emergency in question. The existence of a public emergency is determined according to the respective procedures in the Member States or of relevant international organisations.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 58
(58) An exceptional need may also arise when a public sector body can demonstrate that the data are necessary either to prevent a public emergency, or to assist recovery from a public emergency, in circumstances that are reasonably proximate to the public emergency in question. Where the exceptional need is not justified by the need to respond to, prevent or assist recovery from a public emergency, the public sector body or the Union institution, agency or body should demonstrate that the lack of timely access to and the use of the data requested for a specified period prevents it from effectively fulfilling a specific task in the public interest that has been explicitly provided in law. Such exceptional need may also occur in other situations, for example in relation to the timely compilation of official statistics when data is not otherwise available or when the burden on statistical respondents will be considerably reduced. At the same time, the public sector body or the Union institution, agency or body should, outside the case of responding to, preventing or assisting recovery from a public emergency, demonstrate that no alternative means for obtaining the data requested exists and that the data cannot be obtained in a timely manner through the laying down of the necessary data provision obligations in new legislation.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 61
(61) A proportionate, limited and predictable framework at Union level is necessary for the making available of data by data holders, in cases of exceptional needs, to public sector bodies and to Union institution, agencies or bodies both to ensure legal certainty and to minimise the administrative burdens placed on businesses. To this end, data requests by public sector bodies and by Union institution, agencies and bodies to data holders should be transparent and proportionate in terms of their scope of content and their granularity. The purpose of the request and the intended use of the data requested for a clearly specified period should be specific and clearly explained, while allowing appropriate flexibility for the requesting entity to perform its tasks in the public interest. The request should also respect the legitimate interests of the businesses to whom the request is made. The burden on data holders should be minimised by obliging requesting entities to respect the once-only principle, which prevents the same data from being requested more than once by more than one public sector body or Union institution, agency or body where those data are needed to respond to a public emergency. To ensure transparency, data requests made by public sector bodies and by Union institutions, agencies or bodies should be made public without undue delay by the entity requesting the data and online public availability of all requests justified by a public emergency should be ensured.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 62
(62) The objective of the obligation to provide the data is to ensure that public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies have the necessary knowledge and information to respond to, prevent or recover from public emergencies or to maintain the capacity to fulfil specific tasks explicitly provided by law. The data obtained by those entities may be commercially sensitive. Therefore, Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council65 should not apply to data made available under this Regulation and should not be considered as open data available for reuse by third parties. This however should not affect the applicability of Directive (EU) 2019/1024 to the reuse of official statistics for the production of which data obtained pursuant to this Regulation was used, provided the reuse does not include the underlying data. In addition, it should not affect the possibility of sharing the data for conducting research or for the compilation of official statistics, provided the conditions laid down in this Regulation are met. Public sector bodies should also be allowed to exchange data obtained pursuant to this Regulation with other public sector bodies to address the exceptional needs for which the data has been requested, subject to adequate protection of that data. _________________ 65 Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information (OJ L 172, 26.6.2019, p. 56).
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 74
(74) Data processing service providers should be required to offer all assistance and support that is required to make the switching process successful and effective without requiring those data processing service providers to develop new categories of services within or on the basis of the IT-infrastructure of different data processing service providers to guarantee functional equivalence in an environment other than their own systems. Nevertheless, service providers are required to offer all assistance and support that is required to make the switching process effective at no extra cost to the recipient. Existing rights relating to the termination of contracts, including those introduced by Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council67 should not be affected. _________________ 67 Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services (OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 1).
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 85
(85) In order to take account of the rapid development of new technologies in this area and the technical aspects of data processing services, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of supplementing this Regulation to introduce a monitoring mechanism on switching charges imposed by data processing service providers on the market, to further specify the essential requirements for operators of data spaces and data processing service providers on interoperability and to publish the reference of open interoperability specifications and European standards for the interoperability of data processing services. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201670. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 70 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 86
(86) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of supplementing this Regulation to adopt common specifications to ensure the periodic updating and interoperability of common European data spaces and data sharing, the switching between data processing services, the interoperability of smart contracts as well as for technical means, such as application programming interfaces, for enabling transmission of data between parties including continuous or real-time and for core vocabularies of semantic interoperability, and to adopt common specifications for smart contracts. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council71 . _________________ 71 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p.13).
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) whether the manufacturer supplying the product or the service provider providing the related service intends to use the data itself or allow a third party to use the data and, if so, the purposes for which those data will be used and the period for which they can be accessed;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) how the user may request that the data are shared with a third-party, the period during which the third party has access to this data and the necessary safeguards after the data access has ended;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The user or third party shall not be required to provide any information beyond what is necessary to verify the quality as user or as third party pursuant to paragraph 1. The data holder shall not keep any information on the third party’s access to the data requested beyond the period for which it has been granted and beyond what is necessary for the sound execution of the third party’s access request and for the security and the maintenance of the data infrastructure.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. A third party shall process the data made available to it pursuant to Article 5 only for the purposes and under the conditions agreed with the user, including the period of access, and subject to the rights of the data subject insofar as personal data are concerned, and shall delete the data when they are no longer necessary for the agreed purpose.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Data holders and data recipients shall have access to cross-border and other dispute settlement bodies, certified in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, to settle disputes in relation to the determination of fair, reasonable and non- discriminatory terms for and the transparent manner of making data available in accordance with Articles 8 and 9.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) destroy the data made available by the data holder and any copies thereof after expiry of the period for which access has been granted;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) specify what data are required and the period of access thereto;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) explain the purpose of the request, the intended use of the data requested, and the duration of that use as well as the procedure to be followed after expiry of the access period;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. A data holder receiving a request for access to data under this Chapter shall make the data available to the requesting public sector body or a Union institution, agency or body without undue delay during the agreed period of access.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) not use the data in a manner incompatible with the purpose for which they were requested and beyond the agreed period of access;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the national competent authority responsible for the application and enforcement of Chapter VI of this Regulation shall have the necessary expertise and experience in the field of data and electronic communications services.
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) promoting information and awareness among users and entities falling within scope of this Regulation of the rights and obligations under this Regulation;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3 – point f
(f) cooperating with competent authorities of other Member States to ensure the consistent application of this Regulation, particularly regarding issues with cross-border implications, including the exchange of all relevant information by electronic means, without undue delay;
2022/11/17
Committee: LIBE