BETA

Activities of Clare DALY related to 2020/2013(INI)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice
2020/11/23
Committee: LIBE
Dossiers: 2020/2013(INI)
Documents: PDF(139 KB) DOC(66 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Patryk JAKI', 'mepid': 197516}]

Amendments (6)

Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the UN and the wider international community to undertake all necessary efforts to ensure thatban the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in military affairs and that the use of AI-enabled systems by the military stay within the strict limits set by international law and international humanitarian law (IHL);
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that the European Parliament already called twice (2014and 2018) for a ban on (lethal) autonomous weapons;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that states, parties to a conflict and individuals, when employing AI-enabled systems in warfare, must at all times adhere to their obligations under the applicable international law and remain accountable for actions resulting from the use of such systems; recalls that AI machines can under no circumstances be held accountable for intended, unintended or undesirable effects caused by AI- enabled systems on the battlefield;
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights that any AI-enabled system used in the military domain must, as a minimum set of requirements, be able to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants on the battlefield, not have indiscriminate effects, not cause unnecessary suffering to persons, not be biased or be trained on biased data, and be in compliance with the IHL principles of military necessity, proportionality in the use of force and precaution prior to engagement;deleted
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on states to carry out an assessment of how autonomous military devices have contributed to their national security and what their national security can gain from AI-enabled weapon systems, in particular as regards the potential of such technologies to reduce human error, thus enhancing the implementation of IHL principles;deleted
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the HR/VP, in the framework of the ongoing discussions on the international regulation of lethal autonomous weapon systems by states parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), to help streamline the global debate on core issues and definitions where consensus has not been reached, in particular as regards concepts and characteristics of AI-enabled lethal autonomous weapons and their functions in the identification, selecsupport a total ban on all autonomous weapons systems, regardless of the degree of automation within the CCW or in a newly drafted convention band engagement of a target, application of ning these weapons; further concept of human responsibility in the use of AI-enabled systems in defence, and the degree of human/machine interaction, including the concept of human control and judgment, during the different stages of the lifecycle of an AI-enabled weaponalls for an end to all research into the gradual automation of weapons systems.
2020/06/04
Committee: AFET