BETA

13 Amendments of Lídia PEREIRA related to 2015/0270(COD)

Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The recent crisis hascrisis of the last two decades have shown that the functioning of the internal market may be under threat and that there is an increasing risk of financial fragmentation. The failure of a bank that is relatively large compared to the national banking sector or the concurrent failure of a part of the national banking sector may cause national DGSs to be vulnerable to large local shocks, even with the additional funding mechanisms provided by Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council12. This vulnerability of national DGSs to large local shocks can contribute to adverse feedback between banks and their national sovereign undermining the homogeneity of protection for deposits and contributing to a lack of confidence among depositors and resulting in market instability. __________________ 12 Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 149).
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The absence of a homogenous level of depositor protection can distort competition, hinder competitiveness and create an effective barrier for the freedoms of establishment and free provision of services by credit institutions within the internal market. A common deposit insurance scheme is therefore urgent and essential for the completion of the internal market in financial services.
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) EDIS should progressively evolve from a reinsurance scheme into a fully mutualised co-insurance scheme over a number of years. In the context of efforts to deepen the EMU, together with the work on the establishment of bridge-financing arrangements for the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) and on developing a common fiscal backstop, this step is necessary to reduce the bank/sovereign links in individual Member States by means of steps towards risk sharing among all the Member States in the Banking Union, and thereby to reinforce the Banking Union in achieving its key objective. However, such risk sharing implied by steps to reinforce Banking Union must proceed in parallel with risk reducing measures designed to break the bank-sovereign link more directly.
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) As the Deposit Insurance Fund, in the re-insurance stage, would only provide an additional source of funding and would only weaken the link between banks and their national sovereign, without however ensuring that all depositors in the Banking Union enjoy an equal level of protection, the reinsurance stage should, after three years, gradually progress into a co- insurance scheme and ultimately into a fully mutualised deposit insurance scheme.
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) While the reinsurance and coinsurance stages would share many common features, ensuring a smooth gradual evolution, pay-outs under the co- insurance stage would be shared between national DGS and the Deposit Insurance Fund as of the first euro of loss. The relative contribution from the Deposit Insurance Fund would gradually increase to 100 percent, resulting in the full mutualisation of depositor risk across the Banking Union after four years.
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41a – paragraph 2
2. In case a participating DGS encounters a payout event or is used in resolution in accordance with Article 79 of this Regulation, it may claim funding from the DIF of up to 205%of its liquidity shortfall as set out in Article 41b.
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41 a – paragraph 3
3. The DIF shall also cover 205%of the excess loss of the participating DGS as set out in Article 41c. The participating DGS shall repay the amount of funding it obtained under paragraph 2 of this Article, less the amount of excess loss cover, in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 41o.
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41 a – paragraph 4
4. Neither the funding nor the excess loss cover shall exceed the lower of 205%of the initial target level of the DIF as set out in Article 74b(1) of this Regulation and 10 times the target level of the participating DGS as defined in the first subparagraph of Article 10(2) of Directive 2014/49/EU.
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41 d – paragraph 1
1. As from the end of the re-insurance period, the participating DGS shall be co- insured by EDIS in accordance with this Chapter for a period of fourthree years (‘co- insurance period’).
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41 e – paragraph 1 –indent 1
– in the first year of the co-insurance period it shall be 205%;
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41 e – paragraph 1 –indent 2
– in the second year of the co- insurance period it shall 450%;
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41 e – paragraph 1 –indent 3
– in the third year of the co-insurance period it shall be 6075%;
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 806/2014
Article 41 e – paragraph 1 –indent 4
– in the fourth year of the co- insurance period it shall be 80%.deleted
2024/03/13
Committee: ECON