[ParlTrack]

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15

(15) To ensure that the impacts of the output floor on low-risk residential mortgage lending by institutions using IRB approaches are spread over a sufficiently long period and thus avoid disruptions to that type of lending that could be caused by sudden increases in own funds requirements, it is necessary to provide for a specific transitional arrangement. For the duration of the arrangement, when calculating the output floor, IRB institutions should be able to apply a lower risk weight to the part of their residential mortgage exposures that is considered secured by residential property under the revised SA-CR. To ensure that the transitional arrangement is available only to low-risk mortgage exposures, appropriate eligibility criteria, based on established concepts used under the SA-CR, should be set. The compliance with those criteria should be verified by competent authorities. Because residential real estate markets may differ from one Member States to another, the decision on whether to activate the transitional arrangement should be left to individual Member States. The use of the transitional arrangement should be monitored by EBA.deleted

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point a

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 92 – paragraph 3 – point a – introductory part

(a) a stand-alone institution in the EU and, for the purposes of complying with the obligations of this Regulation on the basis of its consolidated situation in accordance with Part One, Title II, Chapter 2, an EU parent institution, an EU parent financial holding company and an EU parent mixed financial holding companyinstitutions shall calculate the total risk exposure amount as follows:

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point a

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 92 – paragraph 3 – point b

(b) for the purposes set out in points (i) and (ii), the total risk exposure amount shall be calculated in accordance with paragraph 6: (i) institution in a Member State, for the purposes of complying with obligations of this Regulation on its individual basis; (ii) Member State, a parent financial holding company in a Member Statdeleted in case of a stand-alone subsidiary in case orf a parent ~~mixed financial holding company in a Member State, for the purposes of complying with obligations of this Regulation on the basis of its consolidated situation;~~institution in a

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point a

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 92 – paragraph 3 – point c

(c) for the purposes of complying with the obligations of this Regulation on an individual basis, the total risk exposure amount of an institution which is neither a stand-alone institution in the EU nor a stand-alone subsidiary institution in a Member State shall be the un-floored total risk exposure amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 4.deleted

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23 – point b

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 92 – paragraph 6

6. The total risk exposure amount of an entity ‘i’ for the purposes set out in paragraph 3, point (b), shall be calculated as follows: null where: i = the index that denotes the entity; TREAi = the total risk exposure amount of entity i; U-TREAi = the un-floored total risk exposure amount of entity i calculated in accordance with paragraph 4; DIconso = any positive difference between the total risk exposure amount and the un-floored total risk exposure amount for the consolidated situation of the EU parent institution, EU parent financial holding company or EU parent mixed financial holding company of the group that entity i is part of, calculated as follows: null where: U-TREA = the un-floored total risk exposure amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 4 for that EU parent institution, EU parent financial holding company or EU parent mixed financial holding company on the basis of its consolidated situation; TREA = the total risk exposure amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 3, point (a), for that EU parent institution, EU parent financial holding company or EU parent mixed financial holding company on the basis of its consolidated situation. Contribconsoi = the contribution of entity i, calculated as follows: null where: j = the index that denotes all entities that are part of the same group as entity i for the consolidated situation of the EU parent institution, EU parent financial holding company or EU parent mixed financial holding company; U-TREAj = the un-floored total risk exposure amount calculated by entity j in accordance with paragraph 4 on the basis of its consolidated situation or, in case entity j is a stand-alone subsidiary institution in a Member State, on its individual basis; F-TREAj = the floored total risk exposure amount of entity j calculated on the basis of its consolidated situation as follows: null where: F-TREAj = the floored total risk exposure amount calculated by entity j on the basis of its consolidated situation or, in case entity j is a stand-alone subsidiary institution in a Member State, for its individual basis; S-TREAj = the standardised total risk exposure amount calculated in accordance with paragraph 5 by entity j on the basis of its consolidated situation or, in case entity j is a stand-alone subsidiary institution in a Member State, for its individual basis; x = 72,5 %.deleted

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 40 – point b

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 122 – paragraph 2

Exposures for which such a credit assessment is not available shall be assigned a risk weight of 100 %., except for exposures to SMEs as defined in Article 5 point (8) which shall be assigned a risk weight of 85%;

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 41

Regulation (EU) No
Article 122a – paragraph 3 – point a – introductory part

(a) where the purpose of a specialised lending exposure is to finance the acquisition of physical assets, including ships, aircraft, satellites, railcars, and fleets, and the income to be generated by those assets comes in the form of cash flows generated by the specific physical assets that have been financed and pledged or assigned to the lender by one or several third parties (‘object finance exposures’), institutions shall apply ~~the following~~a risk weights: of 100%.

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 41

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 122a – paragraph 3 – point a – point i

(i) 80 % where the exposure is deemed to be high quality when taking into account all of the following criteria: — obligations even under severely stressed conditions due to the presence of all of the following features: — adequate exposure-to-value of the exposure; — conservative repayment profile of the exposure; — of the assets upon full pay-out of the exposure or alternatively recourse to a protection provider with high creditworthiness; — exposure by the obligor or that risk is adequately mitigated by a commensurate residual asset value or recourse to a protection provider with high creditworthiness; — restrictions over its activity and funding structure; — for risk-mitigation purposes; — material operating risks are properly managed; — the contractual arrangements on the assets provide lenders with a high degree of protection including the following features: — enforceable first-ranking right over the assets financed, and, where applicable, over the income that they generate; — there are contractual restrictions on the ability of the obligor to change anything to the asset which would have a negative impact on its value; — construction, the lenders have a legally enforceable first-ranking right ovdeleted the obligor can meet its financial commensurate remaining lifetime low refinancing risk of the the obligor has contractual the obligor uses derivatives only the lenders have a legally where the assets and the underlying construction contracts; — of the following standards to operate in a sound and effective manner: — asset are tested; — authorisations for the operation of the assets have been obtained; — construction, the obligor has adequate safeguards on the agreed specifications, budget and completion date of the asset, including strong completion guarantees or the involvement of an experienced constructor and adequate contract provisions for liquidated damages; is under the assets being financed meet all the technology and design of the all necessary permits and where the asset is under

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 41

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 122a – paragraph 3 – point a – point ii

~~(ii) 100 % where the exposure is not deemed to be high quality as referred to in point (i);~~deleted

2022/08/11
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 166 – point b – introductory part

Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
Article 382

(b) ~~the following~~ paragraphs 4a and 4b are inserted: 4a. paragraph 4, an institution may choose to calculate an own funds requirements for CVA risk, using any of the applicable approaches referred to in Article 382a, for those transactions that are excluded in accordance with paragraph 4, where the institution uses eligible hedges determined in accordance with Article 386 to mitigate the CVA risk of those transactions. Institutions shall establish policies to specify where they choose to satisfy their own funds requirements for CVA risk for such transactions. 4b. competent authorities the results of the calculations of the own funds requirements for CVA risk for all the transactions referred to in paragraph 4. For the purposes of that reporting requirement, institutions shall calculate the own funds requirements for CVA risk using the relevant approaches set out in Article 382a(1), that they would have used to satisfy an own funds requirement for CVA risk if those transactions were not excluded from the scope in accordance with paragraph 4. is deleted: By way of derogation from Institutions shall report to their

2022/08/18
Committee: ECON

Johan VAN OVERTVELDT, Michiel HOOGEVEEN, Eugen JURZYCA