BETA

16 Amendments of Eero HEINÄLUOMA related to 2021/0376(COD)

Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31 b (new)
(31 b) Member States should require UCITS management companies and AIFMs to act in such a way as to prevent undue costs from being charged to unit- holders. UCITS management companies and AIFMs should also be required to regularly carry out an annual assessment to demonstrate that they have not charged undue costs to their unit-holders. At the moment, divergent market and supervisory practices exist as what industry and supervisors may consider as ‘due’ or ‘undue’ costs. The lack of a consistent definition of the concept of ‘undue cost’ leaves room for regulatory arbitrage and risks of hampering competition between investment funds in the Union market. Furthermore, it may lead to different levels of investor protection depending on where an investment fund is domiciled. To ensure that UCITS management companies and AIFMs do not charge undue costs to investors, the European Securities and Markets Authority should be required to develop draft regulatory technical standards prescribing a definition of undue costs, including rules for AIFs and UCITS to assess on annual basis whether they have charged undue costs to their unit-holders.
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 7 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 4 – point d c (new)
(d c) the amount of fees generated by the AIFM and the amount of fees paid to the delegate;
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 c (new)
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 13 – paragraph 1
(4 c) the first subparagraph of Article 13(1) is replaced by the following: '1. Member States shall require AIFMs to have remuneration policies and practices for those categories of staff, including senior management, risk takers, control functions, and any employees receiving total remuneration that takes them into the same remuneration bracket as senior management and risk takers, whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profiles of the AIFMs or of the AIFs they manage, that are consistent with and promote sound and effective risk management, including ESG risks, and do not encourage risk-taking which is inconsistent with the risk profiles, rules or instruments of incorporation of the AIFs they manage'.
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 d (new)
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 14a
(4 d) The following Article 14a is inserted: 'Article 14c Fees and undue costs 1. Member States shall prohibit AIFMs from charging performance fees to its unit-holders, except where these performance fees are symmetric 2. Member States shall require AIFMs to act in such a way as to prevent undue costs being charged to the AIFs that they manage. 3. Member States shall require AIFMs to carry out an annual assessment to demonstrate that they have not charged undue costs to the AIF and its unit- holders, including by having regard to at least the following elements: (a) the range and quality of services provided to unit-holders, including where these are provided by third parties; (b) the performance of the AIF, including with reference to other comparable AIF investment funds with similar risk profiles and investment strategies available on the market; (c) the level of charges and cost borne by unitholders, including with reference to other comparable AIF investment funds with similar risk profiles and investment strategies available on the market; (d) whether the AIF management company is able to achieve savings and benefits from economies of scale; 4. In order to ensure a consistent harmonisation and implementation of this Article by Member States, ESMA should be required to develop by ... [12 months after the entry into force of this Directive] draft regulatory technical standards to specify the scope of the ban on performance-related fees, a definition for undue costs and the procedures for the purpose of carrying out the assessment on undue costs in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 b (new)
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(10 b) In Article 30, the following paragraph is added: '3a. The Commission shall adopt benchmarks for long-term financial solvency of target companies that are subject to leveraged buy-out operations by AIF. The benchmarks shall contain a combination of four indicators, which consist of: (a) debt service cover (the ratio of cash flow to total debt service); (b) total leverage “dynamic gearing 1” (the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to net cash interest); (c) dynamic gearing 2 (the ratio of net debt to free cash flow); (d) equity ratio (the ratio of equity to total capital). Target companies shall comply with all four indicators and shall conduct regular solvency tests. Dividend payouts shall be limited to one disbursement per year and shall not exceed earnings. In the event of negative solvency there shall be no dividend payout. '
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 35 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the third country where the non-EU AIF is established has signed an agreement with the home Member State of the authorised AIFM and with each other Member State in which the units or shares of the non-EU AIF are intended to be marketed, which fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters, including any multilateral tax agreements, and the third country is not mentioned in Annex I or Annex II to the Council conclusions of 2020 on the revised EU list on non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes54 .; __________________ 54 OJ C 64, 27.2.2020, p. 8.
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the third country where the non-EU AIF is established has signed an agreement with the home Member State of the authorised AIFM and with each other Member State in which the units or shares of the non-EU AIF are intended to be marketed, which fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters, including any multilateral tax agreements, and that third country is not mentioned in Annex I or Annex II to the Council conclusions of 2020 on the revised EU list on non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.;
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 37 – paragraph 7 – point f
(f) the third country where the non-EU AIFM is established has signed an agreement with the Member State of reference, which fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters, including any multilateral tax agreements and the third country is not mentioned in Annex I or Annex II to the Council conclusions of 2020 on the revised EU list on non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.;
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 40 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the third country where the non-EU AIF is established has signed an agreement with the Member State of reference and with each other Member State in which the units or shares of the non-EU AIF are intended to be marketed which fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters including any multilateral tax agreements, and the third country is not mentioned in Annex I or Annex II to the Council conclusions of 2020 on the revised EU list on non- cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.;
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16 – point b
Directive 2011/61/EU
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the third country where the non-EU AIF or non-EU AIFM is established has signed an agreement with the Member State in which the units or shares of the non-EU AIF are intended to be marketed, which fully complies with the standards laid down in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and ensures an effective exchange of information in tax matters, including any multilateral tax agreements, and that third country is not mentioned in Annex I or Annex II to the Council conclusions of 2020 on the revised EU list on non- cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.;
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Directive 2009/65/EC
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point d c (new)
(d c) The amount of fees generated by the management company and the amount of fees paid to the delegate
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new)
Directive 2009/65/EC
Article 14a – paragraph 1
(3 b) Article 14a(1) is replaced by '1. Member States shall require management companies to establish and apply remuneration policies and practices that are consistent with, and promote, sound and effective risk management, including ESG risks, and that neither encourage risk taking which is inconsistent with the risk profiles, rules or instruments of incorporation of the UCITS that they manage nor impair compliance with the management company’s duty to act in the best interest of the UCITS.
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 c (new)
Directive 2009/65/EC
Article 14b – paragraph 1
(3 c) Article 14b(1) is amended as follows: (a) point (a) is replaced by the following: '(a) the remuneration policy is consistent with and promotes sound and effective risk management, including ESG risks, and does not encourage risk taking which is inconsistent with the risk profiles, rules or instruments of incorporation of the UCITS that the management company manages; ' (b) point (b) is replaced by the following: '(b) the remuneration policy is in line with the business and sustainability strategy, objectives, values and interests of the management company and the UCITS that it manages and of the investors in such UCITS, and includes measures to avoid conflicts of interest; ' (c) point (g) is replaced by the following: '(g) where remuneration is performance- related, the total amount of remuneration is based on a combination of the assessment as to the performance of the individual and of the business unit or UCITS concerned and as to their risks and of the overall results of the management company when assessing individual performance, taking into account financial and non-financial criteria; in equal measure;' (d) point (l) is replaced by the following: '(l) the measurement of performance used to calculate variable remuneration components or pools of variable remuneration components includes a comprehensive adjustment mechanism to integrate all relevant types of current and future risks; , including climate and transition risks;' (e) point (r) is replaced by the following: '(r) variable remuneration is not paid through vehicles or methods that facilitate the avoidance of the requirements laid down in this Directive. or have the effect of reducing the tax liability of the employee'
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
Directive 2009/65/EC
Article 89a (new)
(8 a) The following Article 89a is inserted: ‘Article 89a Undue Costs 1. Member States shall require management companies to act in such a way as to prevent undue costs being charged to the UCITS and its unit- holders. 2. Member States shall require management companies to carry out an annual assessment to demonstrate that they have not charged undue costs to the UCITS and its unit-holders, including by having regard to at least the following elements: (a) the range and quality of services provided to unitholders, including where these are provided by third parties; (b) the performance of the UCITS investment fund, including with reference to other comparable UCITS investment funds with similar risk profiles and investment strategies available on the market; (c) the level of charges and cost borne by unitholders, including with reference to other comparable UCITS investment funds with similar risk profiles and investment strategies available on the market; (d) whether the UCITS management company is able to achieve savings and benefits from economies of scale; 3. In order to ensure a consistent harmonisation and implementation of this Article by Member States, ESMA should be required to develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify a definition for undue costs and the procedures for the purpose of carrying out the assessment on undue costs in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. Power is delegated to the Commission to adopt the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No1095/2010.’
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Directive 2009/65/EC
Article 90a (new)
(8 b) The following article 90a is inserted: 'Article 90a Member States shall prohibit UCITS management companies from charging performance fees to its unit-holders, except where these performance fees are symmetric.'
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex I a (new)
Direcitve 2011/61/EU
Annex II – paragraph 1
Annex Ia Paragraph 1 of Annex II is amended as follows: (a) point (a) is replaced by: '(a) the remuneration policy is consistent with and promotes sound and effective risk management , including ESG risks, and does not encourage risk- taking which is inconsistent with the risk profiles, rules or instruments of incorporation of the AIFs they manage;. (b) point (b) is replaced by: '(b) the remuneration policy is in line with the business and sustainability strategy, objectives, values, and interests of the AIFM and the AIFs it manages or the investors of such AIFs, and includes measures to avoid conflicts of interest; ' (c) point (g) is replaced by: '(g) where remuneration is performance related, the total amount of remuneration is based on a combination of the assessment of the performance of the individual and of the business unit or AIF concerned and of the overall results of the AIFM, and when assessing individual performance, financial as well asnd non-financial criteria are taken into account; in equal measure;' (d) point (l) is replaced by: '(l) the measurement of performance used to calculate variable remuneration components or pools of variable remuneration components includes a comprehensive adjustment mechanism to integrate all relevant types of current and future risks; , including climate and transition risks' (e) point (r) is replaced by: '(r) variable remuneration is not paid through vehicles or methods that facilitate the avoidance of the requirements of this Directive. or that have the effect of reducing the tax liability of the employee.'
2022/07/04
Committee: ECON