BETA

20 Amendments of Raffaele STANCANELLI related to 2022/0051(COD)

Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) The valuesupply chain should cover activities related to the production of a good or provision of services by a company, including the development of the product or the service and the use and disposal of the product as well as the related activities of established business relationships of the company. It should encompass upstream established direct and indirect businessdirect relationships that design, extract, manufacture, transport, store and supply raw material, products, parts of products, or provide services to the company that are necessary to carry out the company’s activities, and also downstream relationships, including established direct and indirect business relationships, that use or receive products, parts of products or services from the company up to the end of life of the product, including inter alia the distribution of the product to retailers, the transport and storage of the product, dismantling of the product, its recycling, composting or landfilling.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29 a (new)
(29a) Where the company is not in a position to identify, prevent and mitigate as well as bring to an end or minimise all adverse impacts to full extent, it should be allowed to prioritise them based on their severity and likelihood to occur, as well as with the company’s ability to address them effectively, and the company’s direct contribution to the cause of the adverse impact.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
(43) Companies should monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their due diligence measures. They should carry out periodic assessments of their own operations, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the value chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, minimisation, bringing to an end and mitigation of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments should verify that adverse impacts are properly identified, due diligence measures are implemented and adverse impacts have actually been prevented or brought to an end. In order to ensure that such assessments are up-to- date, they should be carried out at least every 12 months and be revised in-between if there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of adverse impact could have arisen. The assessment should not create excessive financial burdens for SMEs, for which a system of checks based on self-declarations or pre-set forms could be foreseen.
2022/12/06
Committee: JURI
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the company had more than 500 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 150 million in the Union in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) the company did not reach the thresholds under point (a), but had more than 250 employees on average and had a net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 40 million in the Union in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been prepared, provided that at least 50% of this net turnover was generated in one or more of the following sectors:
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the number of part-time employees shall be calculated on a full-time equivalent basis. Temporary agency workers shall be included in the calculation of the number of employees in the same way as if they were workers employed directly for the same period of time by the company.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. In case of a group of companies: (a) the parent company, whether or not it meets the thresholds mentioned in paragraphs 1 or 2, may perform the obligations laid down in Article 4 as well as in Article 15 and 16 on behalf of any or all its subsidiaries which meet the said thresholds; (b) any subsidiary shall be deemed in compliance with the obligations laid down in Article 4 where their parent company includes those subsidiaries in its due diligence corporate policy.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 714 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ‘establisheddirect business relationship’ means a business relationship, whether direct or indirect, which is, or which is expected to be lasting, in view of its intensity or duration and which does not represent a negligible or merely ancillary part of the value chain;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 768 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘stakeholders’ means the company’s employees, the employees of its subsidiaries, and other individuals, groups, communities or entities whose rights or interests are or could be individually and directly affected by the products, services and operations of that company, its subsidiaries and its business relationships;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 769 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) ‘stakeholders’ means the company’s employees, the employees of its subsidiaries, and other relevant individuals, groups, communities or entities whose rights or interests are or could be affected by the products, services and operations of that company, its subsidiaries and its business relationships;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 827 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States shall ensure that companies which are subject to temporary emergency obligations under Article 122 of TFEU can benefit from a targeted and proportionate derogation from the obligations mentioned in paragraph 1. The derogation shall end when the emergency measures are repealed.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 847 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a description of the processes put in place to implement due diligence, including the measures taken to verify compliance with the code of conduct and to extend its application to established business relationships;
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that companies take appropriate measures to identify actual and potential severe adverse human rights impacts and adverse environmental impacts arising from their own operations or those of their subsidiaries and, where related to their value chains, from their established business relationships, in accordance with paragraph 2, 3 and 4.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 913 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that, for the purposes of identifying the adverse impacts referred to in paragraph 1 based on, where appropriate, quantitative and qualitative information, companies are entitled to make use of appropriate resources, including independent reports and information gathered through the complaints procedure provided for in Article 9. Companies shall, where relevant, also carry out consultations with potentially affected groups including workers and other relevant stakeholders, identified as relevant by the company, to gather information on actual or potential adverse impacts.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) seek contractual assurances from a business partner with whom it has a direct business relationship that it will ensure compliance with the company’s code of conduct and, as necessary, a prevention action plan, including by seeking corresponding contractual assurances from its partners, to the extent that their activities are part of the company’s value chain (contractual cascading). When such contractual assurances are obtained, paragraph 4 shall apply in order to avoid the harmful fallout described in Article 3(b) and (c);
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
When contractual assurances are obtained from, or a contract is entered into, with an SME, the terms used shall be fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory. Where measures to verify compliance are carried out in relation to SMEs, the company shall bear the cost of the independent third-party verification. The company may use a verification system based on self- declarations or standard forms.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1009 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall ensure that, where a company is not in a position to prevent all identified potential adverse human rights or potential environmental impacts, the company shall pursue a prioritisation strategy based on the level of severity and likelihood of an adverse impact, the company’s ability to address the adverse impact, and the company’s direct contribution to the cause of the adverse impact.
2022/12/07
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1218 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that companies carry out periodic assessments of their own operations and measures, those of their subsidiaries and, where related to the value chains of the company, those of their established business relationships, to monitor the effectiveness of the identification, prevention, mitigation, bringing to an end and minimisation of the extent of human rights and environmental adverse impacts. Such assessments shall be based, where appropriate, on qualitative and quantitative indicators and be carried out at least every 124 months and whenever there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant new risks of the occurrence of those adverse impacts may arise. The due diligence policy shall be updated in accordance with the outcome of those assessments.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1267 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
In order to provide support to companies or to Member State authorities on how companies should fulfil their due diligence obligations, the Commission, in consultation with Member States, organisations representing SMEs’ interests, employers’ organisations and stakeholders, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, the European Environment Agency, and where appropriate with international bodies having expertise in due diligence, may issue guidelines, including for specific sectors or specific adverse impacts.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI
Amendment 1612 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
da. (e) assess the impact of the Directive on SMEs; (f) assess the availability of support instruments; (g) adopt guidelines; (h) modify model contractual clauses (i) approve other flanking measures.
2022/12/08
Committee: JURI