BETA

45 Amendments of Matteo ADINOLFI related to 2022/0344(COD)

Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Chemical pollution of surface and groundwater poses a threat to the aquatic environment, with effects such as acute and chronic toxicity in aquatic organisms, accumulation of pollutants in the ecosystem and loss of habitats and biodiversity, as well as to human health. Setting environmental quality standards may helps to implement the zero pollution ambition for a toxic-free environment, provided that they are accompanied by gradual and concerted mitigation measures.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) A combination of source-control and end-of-pipe measures is required to effectively deal with most pollutants across their life cycle, including, as relevant, chemical design, authorisation or approval, control of emissions during manufacturing and use or other processes, and waste handling. The setting of new or stricter quality standards in water bodies therefore complements and is coherent with other Union legislation that addresses or could address the pollution problem at one or more of those stages, including Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council49,Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council50, Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council51, Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council52, Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council53, Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council54, Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council55and Council Directive 91/271/EEC56, and specific measures should be provided for end users, who are likely to shoulder the heaviest burden as a result of the application of the directive. _________________ 49 Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1). 50 Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1). 51 Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1). 52 Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on veterinary medicinal products and repealing Directive 2001/82/EC (OJ L 4, 7.1.2019, p. 43). 53 Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67). 54 Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides, (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 71). 55 Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17). 56 Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment (OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p. 40).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) The new scientific knowledge points to a significant risk from several other pollutants found in water bodies, in addition to those already regulated. In groundwater, a particular problem has been identified through voluntary monitoring for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and pharmaceuticals. PFAS have been detected at more than 70% of the groundwater measuring points in the Union and existing national thresholds are clearly exceeded at a considerable number of locations, and pharmaceutical substances are also widely found. In surface waters, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and its derivatives are already listed as priority substances, but other PFAS are now also recognised to pose a risk. Watch-list monitoring under Article 8b of Directive 2008/105/EC has confirmed a risk in surface waters from a number of pharmaceutical substances which should therefore be added to the priority substances list. These substances should be monitored whenever the risk assessment and the river basin risk management pertaining to the abstraction points, carried out in accordance with Article 8 of Directive (EU) 2020/2184, find that these substances are likely to be present in a specific water supply. Furthermore, the values should be applied only once technical guidelines for monitoring this parameter have been drawn up in accordance with Article 13(7) of Directive (EU) 2020/2184.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Considering the growing awareness of the relevance of mixtures and therefore of effect-based monitoring for determining chemical status, and considering that sufficiently robust effect-based monitoring methods already exist for estrogenic substances, Member States should apply such methods to assess the cumulative effects of estrogenic substances in surface waters over a period of at least two years. This will allow the comparison of effect- based results with the results obtained using the conventional methods for monitoring the three estrogenic substances listed in Annex I to Directive 2008/105/EC. That comparison will be used to assess whether effect-based monitoring methods may be used as reliable screening methods. Using suchThe assessments will employ only screening methods wouldhich have the advantage ofproven within the scientific community to be very reliable at delivering accurate data. This would allowing the effects of all estrogenic substances having similar effects to be covered, and not only those listed in Annex I to Directive 2008/105/EC. The definition of EQS in Directive 2000/60/EC should be modified to ensure that it may, in the future, also cover trigger values that might be set for assessing the results of effect- based monitoring. In order for the screening methods to prove their high degree of reliability in the scientific community, the methods must be put forward for and subjected to a public notice and consultation in line with the existing procedure for proposing amendments to EU directives.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) To ensure effective and coherent decision-making and develop synergies with the work carried out in the framework of other Union legislation on chemicals, the European Chemicals Agency (‘ECHA’), should be given a permanent and clearly circumscribed role in the prioritisation of substances to be included in the watch lists and in the lists of substances in Annexes I and II to Directive 2008/105/EC and Annexes I and II to Directive 2006/118/EC, and in the derivation of appropriate science-based quality standards. The Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) and the Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) of ECHA, should facilitate the carrying out of certain tasks conferred on ECHA by providing opinions. ECHA should also ensure better coordination between various pieces of environmental law through increased transparency as regards pollutants on a watch list or the development of Union wide or national EQS or thresholds, by making relevant scientific reports publicly available. To this end, the ECHA should determine the appropriate, proportionate and cost- effective level and combination of product and process checks for both point and diffuse sources. The substances should also be classified as priorities for action on the basis of the risk identified by means of a simplified assessment procedure anchored in scientific principles.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 a (new)
(34a) This directive introduces new and more demanding technical and technological services for both analytics and sampling. For these services to be sustainable, the Commission will carry out an in-depth economic feasibility assessment, in order to quantify the economic, bureaucratic and administrative costs that will fall to the authorities responsible for monitoring, and to examine other possibilities offering better procurement and alternatives for recruitment and staff training.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 b (new)
(34b) Given the cross-border nature of many river basins, an expert scientific study will be required to consider setting common EQS at the European level for river basin-specific pollutants.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 c (new)
(34c) In view of the changes proposed in this directive, the surface water chemical status assessment will change with respect to the current classification and determine the need for a review of the implementation of the common agricultural policy to weigh up any changes thereto.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34 d (new)
(34d) Given the significance of the reference analytical methods and effect- based methods referred to in this directive, common reference guidelines will need to be issued in this regard.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 1 – point e) – fourth indent
-— achieving the objectives of relevant international agreements, including those which aim to prevent and eliminate pollution of the marine environment, by Union action to cease or phase out discharges, emissions and losses of priority hazardous substances, with the exception of those no longer used or produced in Europe, with the ultimate aim of achieving concentrations in the marine environment near background values for naturally occurring substances and close to zero for man-made synthetic substances.; priority hazardous substances that are no longer used or produced in Europe should be monitored and a more in-depth assessment carried out of the related trend, discharges, emissions and losses;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 2 – point 24)
(24) ‘Good surface water chemical status’ means the chemical status required to meet the environmental objectives for surface waters set out in Article 4(1), point (a), of this Directive, that is the chemical status achieved by a body of surface water in which concentrations of pollutants do not exceed the environmental quality standards for priority substances listed in Part A of Annex I to Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council* and the environmental quality standards for river basin specific pollutants set in accordance with Article 8(2), point (c), and Article 8d(1) of that Directive.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 2 – point 30)
(30) ‘Priority substances’ means substances listed in Part A of Annex I to Directive 2008/105/EC, that is substances which present a significant risk to or via the aquatic environment in a high proportion of Member States.’the qualified majority of Member States, as established by the Commission following a public notice, a debate and observations;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 2 – point 30 a)
(30b) ‘River basin specific pollutants’ means pollutants that are not or no longer identified as priority substances but which Member States have identified, on the basis of the assessment of pressures and impacts on surface water bodies carried out in accordance with Annex II to this Directive, as posing a significant risk to or via the aquatic environment within their territory.;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
‘Environmental quality standard’ means the concentration of a particular pollutant or group of pollutants in water, sediment or biota not to be exceeded in order to protect human health and the environment or a trigger value for the adverse effect on human health or the environment of such a pollutant or group of pollutants measured using an appropriate effect-based method.’;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a) – point iv)
(iv) Member States shall implement the necessary measures to progressively reduce pollution from priority substances and river basin specific pollutants, and to cease or phase out emissions, discharges and losses of priority hazardous substances., with the exception of those no longer used or produced in Europe;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 137 #
4. Member States shall ensure that the available individual monitoring data collected in accordance with point 1.3.4 of Annex V and the resulting status in accordance with Annex V are made available to the public and to the European Environment Agency (EEA) at least once a year electronically in a machine-readable format in accordance with Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council*, Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council** and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council***. For those purposes, Member States shall use the formats established in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article.deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point a
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a)
(a) emission controls based on best available techniques;, to be established by the Commission in a specific delegated regulation
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 20 a – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 20(1) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from [OP please insert the date = the date of entry into force of this Directive]36 months following the issue of the reference guidelines on effect-based methods.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15
Directive 2000/60/EC
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee on which the Member States shall be represented by experts in areas including the construction and management of flood defences and infrastructure, storage facilities and the use of water intended mainly for irrigation and environmental upkeep. It shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council*.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 19
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex VIII
(19) Annex VIII is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Directive;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a Directive 2006/118/EC
(c) threshold values established at Union level in accordance with Article 8(3) and listed in Part D of Annex II to this Directive.environmental quality standards set at European level for consistency among the Member States to prevent disparities in chemical classification;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. Threshold values referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), may be established at the national level, at the level of the river basin district or the part of the international river basin district falling within the territory of a Member State, or at the level of a body or a group of bodies of groundwater.;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point d
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall amend the list of threshold values applied in their territories whenever new information on pollutants, groups of pollutants, or indicators of pollution indicates that a threshold value needs to be set for an additional substance, that an existing threshold value needs to be modified, or that a threshold value previously removed from the list needs to be re-inserted. If relevant threshold values are established or amended at Union level, Member States shall adapt the list of threshold values applied in their territories to those values. ;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the values for the groundwater quality standards listed in Annex I and the threshold values referred to in Article 3(1), points (b) and (c), are not exceeded at any monitoring point in that body or group of bodies of groundwater; or;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts to establish, having regard to scientific reports prepared by ECHA, a watch list of substances for which Union-wide monitoring data are to be gathered by the Member States and to lay down the formats to be used by the Member States for reporting the results of that monitoring and related information to the Commission. The same analytical techniques and methods shall be set for all Member States for the sake of data comparability. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 9(2).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
ECHA shall prepare scientific reports to assist the Commission in selecting the substances for the watch list, taking into account key scientific knowledge and the following information:
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall review, for 1. the first time by … [OP: please insert the date = six years after the date of entry into force of this Directive] and every six years thereafter, the list of pollutants set out in Annex I aand indicators set out in Part B of Annex II. To this end, the quality standards for those pollutants set out in that Annex, as well asCommission should determine the appropriate, proportionate and cost-effective level and combination of product and process checks for both point and diffuse sources. The substances should also be classified as priorities for action on the lbasist of pollutthe risk identified by meants and indicators set out in Part B of Annex IIof a simplified assessment procedure anchored in scientific principles.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 8a, to amend Annex I to adapt it to technical and scientific progress by adding or removing groundwater pollutants and quality standards for those pollutants set out in that Annex and to amend Part B in orderPart B to adapt it to technical and scientific progress by adding pollutants or indicators for which Member States have to consider establishing national thresholds.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive 2006/118/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Ccommittee. That committee on which the Member States shall be represented by experts in areas including the construction and management of flood defences and infrastructure, storage facilities and the use of water intended mainly for irrigation, for environmental upkeep. It shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council*.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive 2006/118/EC
Annex I
(11) Annex I is replaced by the text in Annex III to this Directive;deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a Directive 2008/105/EC
(iii) the substances numbered 5, 9, 13, 15, 17, 21, 23, 24, 28, 30, 34, 37, 41, 44 in Part A of Annex I, for which revised EQS are set, and the newly identified substances numbered 46 to 70 in Part A of Annex I, with effect from … [OP please insert the date = the first day of the36 months following 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive]the issue of the guidelines on the reference analytical methods, with the aim of preventing deterioration in the chemical status of surface water bodies and of achieving good surface water chemical status in relation to those substances.;
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall review, for the first time by … [OP: Please insert the date = six years after the date of entry into force of this Directive] and every six years thereafter, the list of priority substances and the corresponding EQS for those substances set out in Part A of Annex I and the list of pollutants set out in Part A of Annex II. To this end, the Commission should determine the appropriate, proportionate and cost-effective level and combination of product and process checks for both point and diffuse sources. The substances should also be classified as priorities for action on the basis of the risk identified by means of a simplified assessment procedure anchored in scientific principles.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8a – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall, from … [OP please insert the date = the first day of the36 months following 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], for a period of two yearthe issue of the guidelines on the reference analytical methods, monitor the presence of estrogenic substances in water bodies, using effect-based monitoring methods. They shall conduct the monitoring at least four times during each of the two years at locations where the three estrogenic hormones 7-Beta estradiol (E2), Estrone (E1) and Alpha-Ethinyl estradiol (EE2) listed in Part A to Annex I to this Directive, are being monitored using conventional analytical methods in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC and Annex V to that Directive. Member States may use the network of monitoring sites identified for the surveillance monitoring of representative surface water bodies in accordance with point 1.3.1 of Annex V to Directive 2000/60/EC. To this end, the resources required to perform these activities need to be duly incorporated, and specific guidelines and reference analytical methods are essential. In addition, a training period should be factored in for staff at the national environmental agencies.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts to establish, having regard to scientific reports prepared by ECHA, a watch list of substances for which it is necessary to gather Union wide monitoring data from the Member States and to lay down the formats to be used by the Member States for reporting the results of that monitoring and related information to the Commission. The monitoring activities are not expected to entail costs for farms. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 9(2).
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Directive 2008/105/EC
The watch list shall contain a maximum of 10 substances or groups of substances at any one time, and shall indicate the monitoring matrices and the possible methods of analysis for each substance. Those monitoring matrices and methods shall not entail excessive costs for the competent authorities. For these investigations, an in-depth assessment will nevertheless be required to estimate the costs associated with monitoring, the analytical methods, equipment upgrades and dedicated staff. The substances to be included in the watch list shall be selected from amongst the substances for which the information available indicates that they may pose a significant risk at Union level to, or via, the aquatic environment and for which monitoring data are insufficient. The watch list shall include substances of emerging concern.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
As soon as suitable monitoring, precise and EU-wide analytical methods for monitoring micro- plastics (including the types that will need to be sought) and selected antimicrobial resistance genes have been identified, those substances shall be included in the watch list.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – introductory part
ECHA shall prepare scientific reports to assist the Commission in selecting the substances for the watch list, taking into account key scientific knowledge and the following information:
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8b – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 – point e
(e) research projects and scientific publications, including information on trends and predictions based on modelling or other predictive assessments and data and information from remote sensing technologies, earth observation (Copernicus services), in-situ sensors and devices, or citizen science data, leveraging the opportunities offeprovided that the models or other predictive assessments, sensors and devices ared by artificial intelligence, advanced data analysis and processingroadly accepted by the scientific community as approaches with sound scientific foundations.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8d
(8) the following Article 8d is inserted: ‘Article 8d River Basin Specific Pollutants 1. Member States shall set and apply EQS for the river basin specific pollutants covered by the categories listed in Part A of Annex II to this Directive, where those pollutants pose a risk to water bodies in one or more of their river basin districts based on the analyses and reviews under Article 5 of Directive 2000/60/EU, in accordance with the procedure set out in Part B of Annex II to this Directive. Member States shall, by [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 18 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], inform ECHA of the EQS referred to in the first subparagraph. ECHA shall make that information publicly available. 2. Where EQS for river basin specific pollutants have been set at Union level and listed in Part C of Annex II, in accordance with Article 8, those EQS shall take precedence over EQS for river basin specific pollutants established at national level in accordance with paragraph 1. Those EQS set at Union level shall also be applied by the Member States to establish whether the river basin specific pollutants listed in Part C of Annex II pose a risk. Compliance with the applicable national EQS or EQS set at Union level, where relevant, is required for a water body to be in good chemical status, in accordance with the definition set out in Article 2(24) of Directive 2000/60/EC.;’deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [OP please insert the date = the first day of the month following 18 months aftermonth once 36 months have elapsed since the datissue of entry into forcethe guidelines ofn this Directivee reference analytical methods].
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex VIII – point 13
(2) point 13 is added: ’13. Microorganisms, genes or genetic material reflecting the presence of microorganisms resistant to antimicrobial agents, in particular microorganisms pathogenic to humans or livestock..’deleted
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Directive 2006/118/EC
Annex I – Footnote 12 a (new)
(12a) All references to the PFAS shall include their salts and the linear and branched structural isomers.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Directive 2006/118/EC
Annex I – Footnote 12 b (new)
(12b) Given the different criteria for identifying metabolites in the Member States, provision will need to be made, before this directive enters into force, for a list of active substances together with the relevant and non-relevant metabolites and information on the associated risk.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I Part A – Table – Row 2 – Footnote 3
(3) This parameter is the EQS expressed as an annual average value (AA- EQS). Unless otherwise specified, it applies to the total concentration of all substances anisomers, including branched isomers.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex V – paragraph 1 – point 2
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – Part A – Table – Row 9 – Footnote 10
(10) No indicative parameter is provided for this group of substances. The indicative parameter(s) must be dey therefore need to be clearly identifined through the analytical methodand standardised at Member State level.
2023/04/05
Committee: ENVI