7 Amendments of Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA related to 2020/0289(COD)
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In its Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 December 2019, entitled ‘The European Green Deal’ the Commission committed itself to consider revising Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 to improve access to administrative and judicial review at Union level for citizens and environmental non- governmental organisations who have concerns about the compatibility with environmental law of decisions with effects on the environment. The Commission also committed to take action to improve their access to justice before national courts in all Member States; to this end, it issued a Communication on ‘Improving access to justice in environmental matters in the EU and its Member States’.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) When assessing whether an administrative act contains provisions which may, because of their effects, contravene environmental law, it is necessary to consider whether such provisions may have an adverse effect on the attainment of the objectives of Union policy on the environment set out in Article 191 TFEU. As a result, the internal review mechanism should also cover acts that have been adopted in the implementation of polici and/or whether such provisions strictly fall within the competences of ther than Union policy on the environmentand do not breach the principle of subsidiarity.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) According to the case law of the CJEU63, environmental non-governmental organisationsthose requesting an internal review of an administrative act are required to put forward facts or legal arguments of sufficient substance to give rise to serious doubts when stating the grounds for their request of review. _________________ 63Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 September 2019 in Case C-82/17 P, TestBioTech v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2019:719, at para 69.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2