Activities of Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA related to 2020/2016(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on artificial intelligence in criminal law and its use by the police and judicial authorities in criminal matters
Amendments (9)
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas digital technologies in general and artificial intelligence (AI) in particular bring with them extraordinary promise; whereas AI is one of the strategic technologies of the 21st century, generating substantial benefits in efficiency, accuracy, and convenience, and thus bringing positive change to the European economy and improving the security and safety of European citizens; whereas AI should not be seen as an end in itself, but as a tool for serving people, with the ultimate aim of increasing human well- being;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas trustworthy AI systems need to be accountable, designed for all (including consideration of vulnerable, marginalised populations in their design), be non-discriminatory, safe and transparent, and respect human autonomy and fundamental rights;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the Union together with the Member States bear a critical responsibility for ensuring that policy choices surrounding the development, deployment and use of AI applications in the field of the judiciary and law enforcement are made in a transparent manner, respect the principles of necessity and proportionality, and guarantee that the policies and measures adopted will fully safeguard fundamental rights within the Union;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas AI tools and applications are also used by the judiciary worldwide, in some countries, including in sentencing, calculating probabilities for reoffending and in determining probation;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that, as processing large quantities of data is at the heart of AI, the right to the protection of private life and the right to the protection of personal data apply to all areas of AI, and that the Union legal framework for data protection and privacy in both the Union and Member States must be fully complied with;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the fact that many algorithmically driven identificafacial recognition technologies disproportionately misidentify non-white people, children, the elderly, as well ashave become much more accurate in recent years; expresses concern that these systems make more mistakes when identifying dark-skinned people and women;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for algorithmic explainability and transparenctransparency in the design of this type of technology in order to ensure that the development, deployment and use of AI systems for judiciary and law enforcement comply with fundamental rights, and are trusted by citizens, as well as in order to ensure that results generated by AI algorithms can be rendered intelligible to users and to those subject to these systems, and that there is transparency on the source data and how the system arrived at a certain conclusion;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. CRecalls for a moratorium on the deployment ofthat all facial recognition systems for law enforcement, untiland their technical standards can be considered fully fundamental rights compliant, results derived are non-discriminatory, and there is public trust in the necessity and proportionality for the deployment of such technologiesmust fully comply with fundamental rights and the principles of necessity and proportionality;