BETA

14 Amendments of Liesje SCHREINEMACHER related to 2020/2076(INI)

Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the COVID-19 crisis has had a profound impact on global production and has prompted the European Union to consider its future industrial strategyommission’s proposal on a future EU industrial strategy was published at the very beginning of the COVID-19 crisis and has since been complemented by a further package of recovery measures for Europe’s industry and SMEs; notes that the Strategy focuses on business recovery in a first phase, reconstruction and transformation in a second phase.;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that this crisis has demonstrated the need for the EU to adjust its industrial strategy by strengthening the defence of its strategic interests without abandoning international trade; believes that the EU must strike the right balance between protection and openness of its markets, while defending fair competition rules at global level;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that the Competitiveness Council on 15 May 2020 referred to 14 industrial ecosystemsCommission having identified 14 coherent industrial ecosystems, representing more than 50 % of EU added value, whose strategic independence shouldmust be ensured;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that the EU labour market must be at the heart of the EU’s future industrial strategy; points out that any industrial transformation, besides economic aspects, should focus on the preservation of existing and the creation of new employment;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasizes that strong and sustained investment into higher professional education, in particular in STEM fields, will be a key element to stimulate digital innovation, to generate skilled work force and to reduce skill mismatches between job opportunities and job seekers;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Is of the opinion that the “Important Projects of Common European Interest” should emphasise projects linked to the Digital Single market, designed to bring together public and private sectors to undertake large- scale projects contributing to the Union’s objectives, thereby encouraging the development of important collaborative projects which promote common European interests, such as the digital transformation; welcomes a reform of the Commission’s guidelines in this regard;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Is of the opinion that the creation of a European data economy will be essential in shaping the industrial strategy for Europe; stresses that a European data economy should be human-centric, respect fundamental rights, and be in compliance with privacy rules, data protection, and intellectual property rights;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Stresses the importance of a European single market for data, addressing the challenges which result from a significant increase in legally available data; stresses that individuals, employees and companies in Europe should retain control over their data, based on secure data infrastructures and trusted value chains; considers it vital that the industrial strategy includes measures to build sovereign digital infrastructures and to encourage companies to store and process their data on European soil;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Considers it essential to promote data sharing among public administrations, businesses, research institutions and the public, while respecting data protection and privacy rules, trade secrets and intellectual property rights;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 g (new)
3g. Welcomes the Commission’s announcement to propose an Intellectual Property Action Plan, which assesses the need to upgrade the legal framework, to ensure a smart use of IPR for AI and to address counterfeited products; stresses that the purpose of such an Action plan should furthermore be to uphold Europe’s sovereignty and to promote a global level playing field of IPR protection;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 h (new)
3h. Stresses that the digital transformation will be a key driver for Europe to regain its technological and digital sovereignty and shall therefore be at the heart of any future industrial strategy for Europe;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need for a trade policy capable of diversifying the EU’s sources of supply, and for European companies to be encouraged to be flexible and capable, when needed, of urgently reorienting their production towards vital productsdependence on third country technology and raw materials; urges the Union to increase investment in sectors that are strategic for the EU’s autonomy and the Union’s sovereignty to tackle EU’s dependency;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that it is also prudent to encourage Member States to build up sufficient stocks of certain emergency equipment, such as FFP2 masks and surgical masks;deleted
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to help tack the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic by pursuinge an ambitious industrial policy ofwhich stimulatinges innovation in prosperous technologies of the future, in particular those using artificial intelligence.such as artificial intelligence, robotics, quantum and high performance computing;
2020/06/24
Committee: JURI