BETA

13 Amendments of Pervenche BERÈS related to 2017/0063(COD)

Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure a truly common competition enforcement area in Europe that provides a more even level playing field for undertakings operating in the internal market and reduces unequal conditions for consumers there is a need to put in place minimum guarantees of independence and, adequate financial, human and technological resources and core enforcement and fining powers when applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and national competition law provisions in parallel to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU so that NCAs can be fully effective.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
(17) NCAs should be able to prioritise their proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU to make effective use of their resources, and to allow them to focus on preventing and bringing to an end anti-competitive behaviour that distorts competition in the internal market. To this end, they should be able to reject complaints on the grounds that they are not a priority. This should be without prejudice to the power of NCAs to reject complaints on other grounds, such as lack of competence or to decide there are no grounds for action on their part. In case of rejection, the NCA should inform the complainant in due time with a justification. The power of NCAs to prioritise their enforcement proceedings is without prejudice to the right of a government of a Member State to issue general policy or priority guidelines to national competition authorities that are not related to specific proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) NCAs should have the necessary resources, in terms of staff, expertise, financial means and technical and technological equipment, to ensure they can effectively perform their tasks when applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. In case their duties and powers under national law are extended, the resources that are necessary to perform those tasks should still be sufficient.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) National administrative competition authorities have the power to set their priorities for carrying out tasks for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU as defined in Article 5(2). To the extent that national administrative competition authorities are obliged to consider complaints which are formally filed, this shall include the power of those authorities to reject such complaints, excluding complaints emanating from other public authorities, on the grounds that they do not consider them to be a priority. This is without prejudice to the power of national competition authorities to reject complaints on other grounds defined by national law.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that national competition authorities have the human, financial, technical and technological resources that are necessary for the effective performance of their duties, including their consultative role, and exercise of their powers when applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU as defined in paragraph 2.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that if a reasonable suspicion exists that books or other records related to the business and to the subject matter of the inspection which may be relevant to prove a serious violation of Article 101 or Article 102 TFEU are being kept in any premises other than those referred to in Article 6, land or means or transport, including the homes of directors, managers, and other members of staff of undertakings and associations of undertakings, national administrative competition authorities may conduct unannounced inspections in such premises, land and means of transport.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that national administrative competition authorities may by decision require undertakings and associations of undertakings to provide all necessary information for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU within a specified time limit. This obligation shall cover information which is accessible to the undertaking and association of undertakings.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that where national competition authorities find that there is an infringement of Article 101 or 102 TFEU, they may by decision require the undertakings and associations of undertakings concerned to bring such infringement to an end. For that purpose, they may impose any behavioural or structural remedies which are proportionate to the infringement committed and necessary to bring the infringement effectively to an end. Structural remedies can only be imposed either where there is no equally effective behavioural remedy or where any equally effective behavioural remedy would be more burdensome for the undertaking concerned than the structural remedy.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that national administrative competition authorities acting on their own initiative may by decision order the imposition of interim measures on undertakings at least in cases where there is urgency due to the risk of serious and irreparable harm to competition and on the basis of a prima facie finding of an infringement of Article 101 or Article 102 TFEU. Such a decision shall apply either for a specific period of time and may be renewed in so far that is necessary and appropriate, with the possibility to be renewed, or until the final decision is taken.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Without prejudice to national laws of the Member States which provide for the imposition of sanctions in criminal judicial proceedings, Member States shall ensure that national administrative competition authorities may either impose by decision in administrative proceedings, or, request in non-criminal judicial proceedings the imposition of effective, proportionate and deterrent pecuniary fines on undertakings or associations of undertakings which are determined in proportion to their total worldwide turnover, where intentionally or negligently:
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) they supply incorrect, incomplete or misleading information in response to a request made by a decision referred to byin Article 8 or do not supply information within the specified time-limit;
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Where necessary to ensure the full payment of the fine, Member States shall ensure that national competition authorities are entitled to require the payment of the outstanding amount of the fine by any of the undertakings whose representatives were members of the decision-making bodies of the association. To the extent that it is still necessary, national competition authorities shall also be entitled to require the payment of the outstanding amount of the fine by any of the members of the association which were active on the market on which the infringement occurred. However, payment shall not be required from those members of the association that did not implement the infringement and either were not aware of it or have actively distanced themselves from it before the investigation started.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1
The costs incurred by the Commission in connection with the maintenance and the development of the European Competition Network System and cooperation within the European Competition Network shall be borne by the general budget of the Union within the limit of the available appropriations.
2017/11/06
Committee: ECON