16 Amendments of Marc ANGEL related to 2022/0379(COD)
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) To set up cross-border interoperable public services, it is important to focus on the interoperability aspect as early as possible in the policymaking process. Therefore, the public organisation that intends to set up a new or to modify an existing network and information system that is likely to result in high impacts on the cross-border interoperability, should carry out an interoperability assessment. This assessment is necessary to understand the magnitude of impact of the planned action and to propose measures to reap up the benefits and address potential costs. The interoperability assessment should be mandatory in three cases, which are in scope for cross-border interoperability. In other situations, the public organisations may decide to carry out the interoperability assessment on a voluntary basis. Where an equivalent interoperability assessment has already been carried out, for instance in the context of proposing Union or national law, a new one does not need to be carried out in relation to those same requirements.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The interoperability assessment should evaluate the impacts of the planned action on cross-border interoperability of network and information system, for example, having regard to the origin, nature, particularity and scale of those impacts. The assessment may also consider cybersecurity risks and the implementation of appropriate risk- management measures. The outcome of that assessment should be taken into account when determining the appropriate measures that need to be taken in order to set up or modify the network and information system.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Information should be collected in order to assess the performance of this Regulation against the objectives it pursues, and in order give feedback for an evaluation of this Regulation in accordance with paragraph 22 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making37. Therefore, the Commission should carry out a monitoring and evaluation of this Regulation. The evaluation should be based on the five criteria of efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, coherence and EU value added. The evaluation should also be the basis for impact assessments of possible further measures. The monitoring mechanismshould integrate existing data sources and monitoring processes in order to minimise the burden on authorities. _________________ 37 OJ L 123, 12.5. 2016, p 1.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
(9a) ‘regulatory sandbox’ means a controlled environment set up by a public sector body or an institution, body or agency of the Union for the development, training, testing and validation of innovative interoperability solutions, where appropriate in real world conditions, supporting the cross-border interoperability of network and information systems which are used to provide or manage public services to be delivered or managed electronically for a limited period of time under regulatory supervision.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
(ca) a description of the risk assessments and the implementation of cybersecurity risk-management measures on the cross-border interoperability of one or several network and information systems concerned.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. The Interoperable Europe Board shall adopt guidelines on the content offor the interoperability assessment by ... at the latest [one year after the entry into force of this Regulation], including practical check lists, and monitor the compliance with the guidelines.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) not be subject to third party rights or contain personal data or confidential informationthat prevent their distribution and use;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) not contain personal data or confidential information;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Regulatory sandboxes shall be operated under the responsibility of the participating public sector bodies or institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union and, where the sandbox entails the processing of personal data by public sector bodies, under the supervision of other relevant national authorities, or where the sandbox entails the processing of personal data by institutions, bodies, and agencies of the Union, under the responsibility of the European Data Protection Supervisor.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) contribute to evidence-based regulatory learning;
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point d b (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point d b (new)
(db) improve legal certainty and contribute to the sharing of best practices through cooperation with the authorities involved in the regulatory sandbox with a view to ensuring compliance with this Regulation and, where appropriate, with other Union and Member States legislation;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The participating public sector bodies, institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union shall ensure that, to the extent the innovative interoperability solution involves the processing of personal data or otherwise falls under the supervisory remit of other national authorities providing or supporting access to data, the national data protection authorities and those other national authorities are associated to the operation of the regulatory sandbox. As appropriate, the participating public sector bodies, institutions, bodies or agencies of the Union may allow for the involvement in the regulatory sandbox of other actors within the GovTech ecosystem such as national or European standardisation organisations, notified bodies, research and experimentation labs, innovation hubs, and companies wishing to test innovative interoperability solutions. Cooperation may also be envisaged with third countries establishing mechanisms to support innovative interoperability solutions for the public sector.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 7
Article 12 – paragraph 7
7. The participating public sector bodies, institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union shall submit periodic reports and a final report to the Interoperable Europe Board and the Commission on the results from the regulatory sandboxes, including good practices, lessons learnt and recommendations on their setup and, where relevant, on the development of this Regulation and other Union legislation supervised within the regulatory sandbox. The Interoperable Europe Board shall issue an opinion to the Commission on the outcome of the regulatory sandbox, specifying, where applicable, the actions needed to implement new interoperability solutions to promote the cross-border interoperability of network and information systems which are used to provide or manage public services to be delivered or managed electronically.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall build a Union-wide recognised certification programme with different skill levels, to promote best practices, human resources qualifications and a culture of excellence.
Amendment 89 #
(a) short- and long-term needs for the development of interoperability solutions;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall monitor the progress of the development of cross- border interoperable public services to be delivered or managed electronically in the Union. The monitoring shall give priority to the reuse of existing international, Union and national monitoring data and to automated data collection. The Commission shall consult the Interoperable Europe Board on the methodology and process of the monitoring.