BETA

2 Amendments of Robert STURDY related to 2010/2080(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes the fact that where the interests of people across Europe are affected, for example in such issues as the fight against dangerous, or potentially dangerous counterfeit products and the illicit trade in firearms, the process of harmonisation of legislation across Europe can be very beneficial; stresses that the process of harmonisationmight be beneficial; in addition to the exchange of best practice by Member States; stresses that the process of harmonisation, if ultimately conducted after a careful assessment of the existing national legislations in force, must be carried out in a fully democratic and transparent manner; notes that the harmonisation of legislations and of the respective scope of civil law and criminal law on several related matters has become an integral part of discussions in international trade negotiations, and that customs enforcement measures also raise a number of legal issues;
2010/07/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that, when it comes to imposing criminal sanctions against counterfeiters and perpetrators of intellectual piracy, a quantitative criterion should be taken into account when defining what a "commercial scale" means; stresses that the extent of the damage caused by counterfeiting new high added value technologies is greater than counterfeiting of older technology that might no longer be of great relevance in the post-industrial world, even if the latter might be covered by patents;
2010/07/20
Committee: INTA