BETA

47 Amendments of Peter SKINNER related to 2009/0142(COD)

Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) There is a need to introduce an effective instrument to establish harmonised technical standards in financial services to ensure, also through a single rulebook, a level playing field and an adequate protection of depositors, investors and consumers across Europe. As a body with highly specialised expertise, it is efficient and appropriate to entrust the Authority, in areas defined by Community law, with the elaboration of draft technical standards, which do not involve policy choices. The Commission should endorse those draft technical standards in accordance with Community law in order to give them binding legal effect. The draft technical standards have to be adopted by the Commission. They would be subject to amendmentIt can choose to reject them in part or in whole if, for example, the draft technical standards were incompatible with Community Law, wouldEuropean Union law, do not respect the principle of proportionality or would run counter to the fundamental principles of the internal market for financial services as reflected in the acquis of CommunityEuropean Union financial services legislation. To ensure a smooth and expeditedious adoption process for those standards, the Commission should be subject to a time limit for its decision on the endorsementwhen deciding when to endorse, partially endorse or reject them. The process for the development of technical standards in this regulation is without prejudice to the Commission’s powers to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty. The matters concerned by the technical standards do not involve policy decisions, and their content is framed by the Union acts adopted at Level 1. Development of the draft standards by the Authority ensures that they fully benefit from the specialised expertise of national supervisory authorities.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Serious threats to the orderly functioning and integrity of financial markets or the stability of the financial system in the Community require a swift and concerted response at Community level. The Authority should therefore be able to require national supervisory authorities to take specific actions to remedy an emergency situation. As the deThe European Systermination of an emergency situation involves a significant degree of discretion, this power should be conferred on the Commissionc Risk Board should establish when there is an emergency situation. The Commission should declare an emergency on a recommendation from the European Systemic Risk Board. To ensure an effective response to the emergency situation, in the event of inaction by the competent national supervisory authorities, the Authority should be empowered to adopt, as a last resort, decisions directly addressed to financial institutions in areas of Community law directly applicable to them aimed at mitigating the effects of the crisis and restoring confidence in the markets.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In order to safeguard financial stability it is necessary to identify, at an early stage, trends, potential risks and vulnerabilities stemming from the micro- prudential level, across borders and across sectors. The Authority should monitor and assess such developments in the area of its competence and, where necessary, inform the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission, the other European Supervisory Authorities and the European Systemic Risk Board on a regular and, as necessary, ad hoc basis. The Authority should also initiate and coordinate Community-wide stress tests to assess the resilience of financial institutions to adverse market developments, ensuring an as consistent as possible methodology is applied at the national level to such tests. In order to inform the discharge of its functions, the Authority should undertake economic analysis of markets and the impact of potential market developments on them.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) Where appropriate, tThe Authority should consult interested parties on technical standards, guidelines and recommendations and provide them with a reasonable opportunity to comment on proposed measures. For reasons of efficieBefore adopting draft technical standards, guidelines and recommendations the Authority should carry out an impact assessment with a view to ensuring that the best practices for high-quality regulation are met. To provide effective external assistancye, a Banking Stakeholder Group should be established for that purpose, representing in balancedappropriate proportions Community credit and investment institutions (including as appropriate institutional investors and other financial institutions which themselves use financial services), their employeerade unions, academics, and consumers and other retail users of banking services, including SMEs. The Banking Stakeholder Group should actively work as an interface with other user groups in the financial services area established by the Commission or CommunityEU legislation.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
(38) A full time Chairperson, selected by the Board of Supervisors through an open competition,European Parliament from a short list drawn up by the Board of Supervisors should represent the Authority. The management of the Authority should be entrusted to an Executive Director, who should have the right to participate in meetings of the Board of Supervisors and the Management Board without the right to vote.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
(39) In order to ensure cross-sectoral consistency in the activities of the European Supervisory Authorities, those authorities should coordinate closely in a Joint Committee ofthrough the European Supervisory Authorities and reach common positions where appropriate. The Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities should assume all of the functions of the Joint Committee on F(Joint Consultative Committee) (“the Joint Consultative Committee”) and reach common positions where appropriate. The Joint Consultative Committee should coordinate the functions of the three European Supervisory Authorities in relation to financial Cconglomerates. Where relevant, acts also falling within the area of competence of the European Supervisory Authority (Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority or the European Securities and Markets Authority should be adopted in parallel by the European Supervisory Authorities concerned. ) or the European Supervisory Authority (Securities and Markets) should be adopted in parallel by the European Supervisory Authorities concerned. The Joint Consultative Committee will be chaired on a yearly revolving basis by the Chairpersons of the three European Supervisory Authorities. The Chairperson of the Joint Consultative Committee should be a Vice-Chair of the European Systemic Risk Board. The Joint Consultative Committee will have a permanent secretariat, staffed on secondment from the three European Supervisory Authorities, to allow for informal information sharing and the development of a common cultural approach across the three European Supervisory Authorities.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting depositors and investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination whilst taking account of the need to enhance competition and innovation within the internal market and to ensure global competitiveness. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the Community law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting depositors and investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination, and (vi) preventing regulatory arbitrage and contributing to a level playing field. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the Community law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The objective of the Authority shall be to contribute to: (i) improving the functioning of the internal market, including in particular a high, effective and consistent level of regulation and supervision, (ii) protecting depositors and investors, (iii) ensuring the integrity, efficiency and orderly functioning of financial markets, (iv) safeguarding the stability of the financial system, and (v) strengthening international supervisory coordination. For this purpose, the Authority shall contribute to ensuring the consistent, efficient and effective application of the Community law referred to in Article 1(2) above, fostering supervisory convergence and providing opinions to the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission, and undertaking economic analyses of markets to promote the achievement of the Authority’s objectives.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Within three months of receipt of the draft standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse, partially endorse or reject the draft standards. The Commission may extend that period by one month. The Commission may endorse the draft standards only in part or with amendments where the Community interest so requireshall inform the European Parliament and the Council of its decision, stating the reasons.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Decisions adopted under paragraph 6 shall apply to all relevant financial institutions which are active in the non- compliant jurisdiction.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. In the case of adverse developments which may seriously jeopardise the orderly functioning and integrity of financial markets or the stability of the whole or part of the financial system in the CommunityUnion, the Commission, upon its own initiative or following a request by the Authority, the Council, orfollowing a recommendation from the ESRB, may adopt a decision addressed to the Authority, determining the existence of an emergency situation for the purposes of this regulation.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The conclusion drawn by the ESRB shall be subject to an exchange of views ex-post between the ESRB Chairman, the European Parliament and the competent Commissioner and shall be effective as soon as possible.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission may revoke its decision pursuant to paragraph 1 on a recommendation from the European Systemic Risk Board, or at the request of the European Parliament or the Council.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to the powers laid down in Article 9, where a competentnational supervisory authority disagrees on the procedure or content of an action or inaction by another competentnational supervisory authority in areas where the legislation referred to in Article 1(2) requires cooperation, coordination or joint decision making by competentnational supervisory authorities from more than one Member State, the Authority,and does not assign the ultimate responsibility to the group supervisor, the Authority, on its own initiative or at the request of one or more of the competentnational supervisory authorities concerned, may take the lead in assisting the authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraph 2.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 a (new)
Article 12 a Evolution of the Authority The Authority shall evolve according to the best practices recognised at European and international level. One such approach could be the establishment of a new level of direct supervision by the Authority. To avoid international distortions and to strengthen the European System of Financial Supervision, the introduction of direct supervision should be carefully evaluated and considered in order to add value to the supervision of large financial institutions, many of which are global in nature and operate in the EU. This applies above all to those large financial institutions with wholesale banking or other activities that could pose systemic risk to the internal market, and those systemic financial institutions defined and identified at an international level. This issue shall be further studied in the first revision of the present Regulation, as set out in Article 66, which should take place not later than three years from its entry into force.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The delegation of responsibilities shall result in the reallocation of the competencies laid down in the legislation referred to in Article 1(2). The law of the delegate authority shall govern the procedure, enforcement and administrative and judicial review relating to the delegated responsibilities.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) contribute to developingadvice to the appropriate European and international bodies to help facilitate the development of high quality and uniform supervisory standards, including reporting and accounting standards;
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. On the basis of the peer review the Authority may issue guidelines and recommendations to the competentnational supervisory authorities concerned.
2010/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
The Authority shall include in its analysis an economic analysis of the markets for insurance and occupational pensions, and the impact of potential market developments on them. In particular, the Authority shall, in cooperation with the ESRB, initiate and coordinate Community- wide assessments of the resilience of financial institutions to adverse market developments. To that end, it shall develop the following, for application by the competent authorities:
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. The Authority shall ensure an adequate coverage of cross-sectoral developments, risks and vulnerabilities by closely cooperating with the European Supervisory Authority (Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Securities and Markets Authorityupervisory Authority (Securities and Markets) through the European Supervisory Authority (Joint Consultative Committee).
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. On a request from a national supervisory authority of a Member State the Authority shall provide any such information that is necessary to enable the national authority to carry out its duties, provided the national authority in question has appropriate confidentiality arrangements in place.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The Banking Stakeholder Group shall be composed of 30 members, representing in balanced proportions Community credit and investment institutions, their employees as well as consumers and users of banking service. Not more than 15 of the members will be representatives of credit and investment institutions. Not less than five of the members shall be representatives of SMEs, employees (such as trade unions) and consumers and users of banking services. Not less than five of the members shall be independent top- ranking academics.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
A budget shall be allocated to members of the Banking Stakeholder Group that represent non-profit organisations. This budget shall be agreed by the Board of Supervisors and shall be sufficient to cover expenses related to the organisation and attendance of preparatory meetings and the commissioning of external research and opinions.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. The Banking Stakeholder Group may submit opinions and advice to the Authority on any issue related to the tasks of the Authority specified, including in relation to reaching joint positions with the European Supervisory Authority (Insurance and Occupational Pensions) and the European Supervisory Authority (Securities and Markets) as set out in Article 42, with particular focus on the tasks set out in Articles 7 and 8.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The Banking Stakeholder Group shall decide on the issues relevant for consultation as well as have the possibility to influence the agenda for the meetings. All group representatives shall have the opportunity to give inputs. The final decision on the proposed agenda items shall be taken by the Banking Stakeholder Group, with the right for each stakeholder sub-group to have their proposed items on the agenda. Each stakeholder sub-group shall have the freedom to submit its opinions and advice to the Authority which will not necessarily be the opinions of the majority of the stakeholder group.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 6
6. The Banking Stakeholder Group shall adopt its rules of procedure on the basis of the agreement of a two-thirds majority of members.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Before taking the decisions provided for in Article 9(6), Article 10(2) and(3) and Article 11(3) and (4)this Regulation, the Authority shall inform the addressee of its intention to adopt the decision, setting a time limit within which the addressee may express its views on the matter, taking full account of the urgency, complexity and potential consequences of the matter.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the Head of the national public authority competent for the supervision of credit institutions in each Member State. Where there is more than one competent authority in the territory for which the Member State is responsible for the application of EU law, the Heads of those organisations shall be joint representatives on the Board of Supervisors and shall decide between themselves how to exercise their representation, including any votes under Article 29, which shall be shared;
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. For the purposes of Article 11, the Board of Supervisors shall convoke an independent panel to facilitate the impartial settlement of the disagreement, consisting of the Chairperson and two of its members, who are not representatives of the competent authorities which arefour members of the Board of Supervisors. The Chairperson shall select the members of the panel drawn from the Board of Supervisors. No member of the panel from the Board of Supervisors shall be drawn from a national supervisory authority partiesy to the disagreement, nor shall they have any interest in the conflict.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. The Board of Supervisors shall act on the basis of qualified majority of its members, as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty16(4) of the EU Treaty and in Article 3 of the Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions annexed to the Treaty of European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, for acts specified in Articles 7, 8 to 11 and all measures and decisions adopted under Chapter VI.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In addition to the information referred to in Articles 7a, 8, 9, 10, 11a and 18, the report shall include information detailing the scope of the interaction between the Authority and the European Systemic Risk Board and a response where relevant to opinions and reviews issued by the Banking Stakeholder Group. It shall also include any relevant information requested by the European Parliament on an ad-hoc basis.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 718 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter IV – Section 2 – title
JOINT COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIESY (JOINT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE) (This amendment applies throughout the text.)
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1
1. A Joint Committee of tThe European Supervisory Authorities is hereby establishedy (Joint Consultative Committee) ("the Joint Consultative Committee") is hereby established and shall have its headquarters in Brussels.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 2
2. The Joint Committee shall serve as a forum in which the Authority shall cooperate regularly and closely and ensure cross-sectoral consistency and learning with the European Supervisory Authority (Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets) and the European Supervisory Authority (Securities and Markets), in particular on: – financial conglomerates; – accounting and auditing; – micro-prudential analyses for financial stability; – retail investment products; – anti-money laundering measures; and – information exchange with the European Systemic Risk Board and developing the relationship between the European Systemic Risk Board and the European Supervisory Authorityies.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. The Authority shall contribute adequate resources to the administrative support of the Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities. This includes staff,Joint Committee shall have a permanent secretariat, staffed on secondment from the three European Supervisory Authorities. The Authority shall contribute adequate resources to administrative, infrastructure, and operational expenses.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. The Joint Committee shall behave a board composed of the Chairperson and the Chairpersons of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority,s of the European Supervisory Authorities and, where applicable, the Chairperson of a Sub-Committee established under Article 43.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 2
2. The Executive Director, a representative of the Commission and the ESRB shall be invited to the meetings of the Board of the Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities as well as the Sub-Committees mentioned in Article 43 as observers.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 3
3. The chair of the Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities shall be appointed on an annual rotational basis from among the Chairpersons of the European Banking Authority, the European Supervisory Authority (Banking), the European Supervisory Authority (Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Securities and Markets Authorityupervisory Authority (Securities and Markets). The Chairperson of the Joint Committee shall be a Vice-Chair of the European Systemic Risk Board.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Board of the Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities shall meet at least once every two months.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. The Board of Appeal shall be composed of six members and six alternates, who. It shall bcomprise individuals withof high repute with a proven record of relevant knowledge and professional experienctise, exincluding current staff of the competent authorities or other national or Community institutions involved in the activitiessupervisory experience at a sufficiently high level in the fields of banking, insurance and occupational pensions, securities markets or other financial services, and at least two members with sufficient legal expertise to provide expert legal advice ofn the Authority's exercise of its powers.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 759 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 6
6. The Authority, the European Supervisory Authority (Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (Securities and Markets Authority) shall ensure adequate operational and secretarial support for the Board of Appeal through the Joint Committee.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 774 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1
1. In the case of non-contractual liability, the Authority shall, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States, make good any unjustifiable damage caused by it or by its staff in the performance of their duties. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in any dispute over the remedying of such damage.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 781 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. The Commission, in close cooperation with the Committee of European Banking Supervisors established by Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (Level 3 Committee), shall be responsible for the administrative establishment and initial administrative operation of the Authority until the Authority has the operational capacity to implement its own budget.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 790 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall produce its report having taken into account proposals on developing the Authority and ESFS submitted by the Banking Stakeholder Group, established under Article 22, the Board of Supervisors, established under Article 26, and the Joint Committee, established under Article 40. Those proposals will form an annex to the report to be published by the Commission. The Commission shall also consider the views of other stakeholder groups.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 791 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 1 - subparagraph 1 b (new)
The report shall, inter alia, review the performance of the Authorities as pertains to Article 6, the application of the safeguard clause under Article 23 and the functioning of the ESFS as pertains to Article 39. It shall contain proposals on how to further develop the role of the Authority and the ESFS, with a view to creating an integrated European supervisory architecture, including, if necessary, proposals on changes to the Treaty and sectoral legislation.
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 1 - subparagraph 2
That report shall also evaluate progress achieved towards regulatory and supervisory convergence in the fields of crisis management and resolution in the Community. The evaluation shall be based on extensive consultation, including with the Banking Stakeholder Group.deleted
2010/03/26
Committee: ECON