BETA

11 Amendments of Mario BORGHEZIO related to 2010/2311(INI)

Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas terrorism is not a recent phenomenon; whereas counter-terrorism has always been part of regular law enforcement action; whereas 9/11 led to a fundamental change in the methods and instruments used to fight terrorism; whereas terrorism became a matter of national security, with a very different legal framework,
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the aim of counter-terrorism policies should be to undermine the objectives of terrorism, which are to destroy the fabric of our free, open and democratic society; whereas the aim of counter-terrorism must be to protect and strengthen that fabric of democratic society and the effectiveness of counter-terrorism policies must be measured against this aim; whereas in this logic, strengthening civil liberties and democratic scrutiny is not an obstacle to such policies, but their prime objective,
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly welcomes the Commission Communication; regrets, however, that the scope is rather narrow, limited to the implementation of agreed policy measures, and not national counter- terrorism policies or national measures that transpose policies agreed at European or international level;
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that a proper evaluation of ten years of counter-terrorism policies must provide the basis for an evidence-based, needs-driven, coherent and comprehensive EU counter-terrorism strategy by means of an in-depth and complete appraisal to be carried out by a panel of independent experts;
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point c
c. include a full overview of the accumulated impact of counter-terrorism measures on civil liberties, including Member State policies and measures by third countries with a direct impact in the EU;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point e
e. identify where further law enforcement powers are needed or, inversely, where the powers granted are excessive and go beyond what is necessary;
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to map out which measures have objectives other than counter-terrorism, or where further objectives were added to the initial purpose of counter-terrorism (mission creep and function creep), such as law enforcement, immigration policies, public health, or public order;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to invite the ‘High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens’ (chaired by Mr Stoiber) to assess the administrative burden created by counter- terrorism measures since 2001;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – point c
c. provide an overview of the classification of documents, trends in the use of classification, and numbers and trends in access granted or denied to documents relating to counter-terrorism policies; documents made available to Parliament must also be consulted in a secure room;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to investigate and rectify any unlawful action and violations of international law and human rights;
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Urges the Commission to conduct a compulsory proportionality test and a full impact assessment for each proposal involving the large-scale collection of personal data, detection and identification technologies, tracking and tracing, data mining and profiling, risk assessment and behavioural analysis or similar techniques;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: LIBE